Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, February 2007, p. 872-879, Vol. 189, No. 3
0021-9193/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JB.01398-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
,
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802
Received 31 August 2006/ Accepted 7 November 2006
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
U > A > C, thereby wrapping the RNA around TRAP's perimeter (1, 6, 32). Optimal spacing between triplet repeats is 2 nucleotides (nt) (5, 7), although 1-nt spacers and spacers as large as 14 nt have been observed in natural TRAP targets (Fig. 1B).
![]() View larger version (22K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Organization of B. subtilis tryptophan metabolism genes and sequence comparison of the four known TRAP binding sites. (A) The six genes of the trp operon, which is part of the aromatic amino acid supraoperon, and trpG encode the tryptophan biosynthetic enzymes. trpP encodes a putative tryptophan transporter, while the ycbK gene product is similar to known efflux proteins. mtrA and the folate operon encode proteins involved in folic acid metabolism. mtrB encodes TRAP. TRAP regulates the expression of tryptophan metabolism genes by transcription attenuation (trpEDCFBA operon) and translation control (trpG, trpP, ycbK, and trpE) mechanisms. rtpA encodes anti-TRAP (AT), a protein that binds to and inactivates tryptophan-activated TRAP (25). Filled and open lollipop structures represent antiterminator and terminator structures, respectively. The four known TRAP binding sites are represented by black boxes, and bent arrows represent promoters. (B) The triplet repeats of the four known TRAP binding sites are shown in bold and are numbered. The S-D sequences and translation start codons (Met) are shown for trpG, trpP, ycbK, and trpE (first gene in the trp operon). There is a 98-nt gap in the sequence between the last triplet repeat in the trp operon leader and the trpE S-D sequence. The positions of the two dipeptide-encoding minigenes in the ycbK translation initiation region are marked. Expression of minigene 1 has a small inhibitory effect on translation of ycbK (28). The pabB and rtpA stop codons overlap the S-D sequences of trpG and ycbK, respectively.
|
A third TRAP-dependent regulatory mechanism is responsible for controlling translation initiation of trpG, ycbK, and trpP, with bound TRAP directly blocking ribosome binding (12, 18, 22, 23, 28, 29, 31). TrpG functions as a common glutamine amidotransferase subunit in the biosynthesis of both tryptophan and folic acid. TRAP binds to nine triplet repeats that overlap the trpG S-D sequence (Fig. 1B). The TRAP binding site in the trpP transcript also contains nine triplet repeats that overlap its S-D sequence (Fig. 1B). One distinction between trpP and trpG translation control is that the TRAP binding site in trpP mRNA extends into the trpP coding sequence, whereas the TRAP binding site in trpG ends just prior to the coding sequence. TRAP also inhibits translation initiation of ycbK by a similar mechanism; however, in this case, all nine triplet repeats are downstream from the S-D sequence and extend further into the ycbK coding sequence than is the case for trpP (Fig. 1B). In addition, expression of a dipeptide-encoding minigene that utilizes the ycbK S-D sequence has a small inhibitory effect on YcbK synthesis (Fig. 1B) (28).
In the present study, we compared the extents of TRAP-mediated translation inhibition of trpG, ycbK, and trpP. Our results led to the hypothesis that the pabB and trpG gene arrangement might contribute to the low level of TRAP-dependent regulation of trpG. Our data suggest that ribosomes that translate pabB are capable of displacing bound TRAP from the trpG S-D sequence. A new trpG promoter was also identified that is not subject to translation-mediated displacement of bound TRAP.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. B. subtilis strains used in this study
|
![]() View larger version (6K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Schematic representation of translational fusions used in this study. The PpabB and PtrpG promoters are shown. The dashed line in fusion 1 represents a 1,197-nt partial in-frame deletion of the pabB coding sequence. This deletion removes PtrpG. Each fusion was engineered with and without a TAA stop codon in the pabB coding sequence (*).
|
Plasmids pYH68 and pYH69 were constructed by subcloning a DNA fragment containing nt +1040 to +1498 relative to the pabB transcription start site from pYH66 and pYH67 into ptrpBGI-PLK, respectively. In both cases, the resulting trpG'-'lacZ translational fusions were driven exclusively by the PtrpG promoter (Fig. 2, fusion 3). Plasmids pYH68 and pYH69 were linearized and subsequently integrated into the chromosomal amyE locus of strain PLBS338 as described above, giving rise to strains PLBS503 and PLBS504, respectively.
Transformation of B. subtilis strains PLBS442, PLBS443, PLBS486, PLBS487, PLBS503, and PLBS504 with chromosomal DNA from strain BG4233 (
mtrB TRAP) (14) resulted in strains PLBS510, PLBS511, PLBS498, PLBS499, PLBS508, and PLBS509, respectively. The null rho::neo allele from linearized plasmid pYH14 (30) was used to replace the wild-type (WT) rho gene in strains PLBS442, PLBS443, PLBS486, PLBS487, PLBS503, and PLBS504 to yield strains PLBS514, PLBS515, PLBS496, PLBS497, PLBS512, and PLBS513, respectively.
ß-Galactosidase assay. B. subtilis cultures were grown at 37°C in minimal acid casein hydrolysate (0.2%) medium containing 5 µg of chloramphenicol/ml in the absence or presence of 200 µM tryptophan. Growth medium for rho null strains also contained 10 µg of kanamycin/ml. Cells were harvested in late exponential phase and assayed for ß-galactosidase activity as described previously (11, 20).
Gel mobility shift assay.
Quantitative gel mobility shift assays used to examine TRAP-RNA interactions were performed by following published procedures (27, 29). TRAP was purified as described previously (27). trpG, trpP, ycbK, and trp operon leader RNAs were synthesized in vitro and 5' end labeled with [
-32P]ATP. Gel-purified transcripts were renatured by heating to 80°C for 1 min, followed by slow cooling. Binding reactions contained 40 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 4 mM MgCl2, 30 mM KCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 10% glycerol, 0.2 mg Escherichia coli tRNA/ml, 400 U of RNasin/ml, 5'-end-labeled RNA, 1.2 mM L-tryptophan, TRAP, and 0.1 mg of xylene cyanol/ml. The concentrations of labeled trpG, trpP, ycbK, and trp operon leader RNAs were 50 pM, 400 pM, 50 pM, and 10 pM, respectively. TRAP-RNA complexes were allowed to equilibrate at 37°C for 30 min. Samples were fractionated in native polyacrylamide gels. Radioactive bands were visualized and quantified, and Kd values were calculated as described previously (27).
Filter binding assay. Filter binding reactions were performed following a published procedure (24). Purified TRAP and labeled RNAs were identical to those described for the gel mobility shift assay. Binding reactions contained 40 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 4 mM MgCl2, 250 mM KCl, 1 mM DTT, 0.2 mg of E. coli tRNA/ml, 5'-end-labeled RNA, 1.2 mM L-tryptophan, and TRAP. TRAP-RNA complexes were allowed to equilibrate at 37°C for 30 min. Samples were filtered and washed twice with 0.5 ml of 40 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) and 250 mM KCl. Radioactive spots were visualized and quantified as described for the gel mobility shift assay.
Primer extension reaction. Total RNA was isolated from B. subtilis strain PLBS338. Twenty micrograms of RNA was hybridized to a 32P-end-labeled DNA oligonucleotide complementary to nt +1325 to +1355 relative to the pabB transcriptional start site. Reaction mixtures (10 µl) containing 3 µl of hybridization mixture, a 375 µM concentration of each deoxynucleoside triphosphate, 10 mM DTT, 100 µg/ml of bovine serum albumin, 1x Moloney murine leukemia virus (MMLV) reaction buffer, and 20 U/µl MMLV reverse transcriptase were incubated for 15 min at 42°C. Reactions were terminated by the addition of stop solution (29), and samples were fractionated through 6% sequencing gels. Sequencing reactions were performed using pYH66 as the template and the same end-labeled DNA oligonucleotide as a primer.
In vitro transcription.
Single-round in vitro transcription reactions and data analysis were performed as described previously (26). B. subtilis
A RNAP was purified as described previously (21), with an additional HiTrap Heparin HP (Amersham) chromatography step. Stable transcription elongation complexes were formed in a reaction mix containing 10 µM ATP, 10 µM UTP, 2 µM GTP, 2 µCi [
-32P]UTP, and trpG DNA templates. Transcription elongation was halted after incorporation of the 21st nt due to the absence of CTP. Elongation of halted transcription complexes was resumed by the addition of all four nucleoside triphosphates together with heparin. The final concentrations were 150 µM CTP, 150 µM GTP, 150 µM UTP, 10 µM ATP, and 100 µg/ml of heparin. Elongation reactions were stopped after 10 min by the addition of 2x loading buffer. Samples were fractionated through 6% polyacrylamide sequencing gels. DNA templates used in this analysis included a 350-bp EcoRI-HindIII fragment of pYH66 (positions 200 to +150 relative to the start of PtrpG transcription) and a 188-bp PCR product (positions 75 to +113 relative to the start of PtrpG transcription). A DNA template giving rise to a 139-nt transcript was used as a size marker.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Affinities of TRAP for trpG, trpP, ycbK, and trp leader RNA
|
mtrB (TRAP-deficient) genetic background. The observation that expression levels of all three fusions under Trp-negative conditions were lower in WT strains than in the corresponding mtrB mutant strains indicates that the level of endogenously synthesized tryptophan is sufficient to partially activate TRAP. The extent of TRAP-mediated regulation in vivo was determined by comparing expression in the
mtrB strains with that in the WT strains grown in the presence of tryptophan (
mtrB/WT ratio). TRAP-dependent inhibition was highest for trpP (>900-fold), followed by ycbK (21-fold) and trpG (12-fold). |
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. TRAP-mediated regulation of trpG, trpP, and ycbK expression
|
To determine whether translation-mediated displacement of bound TRAP influences the expression of trpG, a stop codon was introduced into the pabB coding sequence upstream from the TRAP binding site that overlaps the trpG translation initiation region. Thus, translation of pabB would terminate 36 codons upstream from the natural pabB stop codon, thereby eliminating any possibility of translation-mediated displacement of bound TRAP. To simplify integration of the trpG'-'lacZ translational fusion into the chromosomal amyE locus, the stop codon was combined with a large in-frame deletion of the pabB coding sequence (Fig. 2, fusion 1). ß-Galactosidase activity was determined for WT and TRAP-deficient (
mtrB) strains grown in the absence and presence of tryptophan. If translation-mediated displacement of bound TRAP participated in regulating the expression of trpG, then reduced expression of fusions containing the stop codon mutation would be expected for WT strains grown in the presence of tryptophan but not for
mtrB strains. To test for the possible influence of transcriptional polarity caused by the engineered stop codon, experiments were also carried out in rho::neo (Rho) strains. Expression from the trpG'-'lacZ translational fusion containing the partial in-frame deletion of pabB (fusion 1) was 8 Miller units in the absence of exogenously added tryptophan and was reduced threefold by the addition of tryptophan to the growth medium (Table 4, row 1). Expression from this fusion was not regulated in response to tryptophan in the
mtrB strain (Table 4, row 2), nor was expression influenced by the rho mutation (compare row 1 with row 3). The extent of TRAP-mediated regulation was determined by comparing expression in the
mtrB and WT strains grown in the presence of tryptophan. TRAP-dependent inhibition of fusion 1 was about fourfold (10/2.8). Importantly, when cells were grown in the presence of tryptophan, introduction of the stop codon resulted in a five- to sevenfold reduction in expression of fusion 1 in the WT (Table 4, compare row 1 with row 4) and rho mutant (compare row 3 with row 6) strains but not in the
mtrB strain (compare row 2 with row 5). These results are consistent with translation-mediated displacement of bound TRAP participating in the TRAP-dependent trpG translation control mechanism.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 4. Ribosome-mediated displacement of bound TRAP influences trpG'-'lacZ expression
|
mtrB strain (Table 4, row 8), nor was expression influenced by the rho mutation (compare row 7 with row 9). TRAP-dependent inhibition of fusion 2 was 12-fold (260/21). As previously observed for fusion 1, the stop codon did not influence expression of the
mtrB strain (Table 4, compare row 8 with row 11). Notably, fusion 2 expression was reduced only twofold by the engineered stop codon when cells were grown in the presence of excess tryptophan for the WT (Table 4, compare row 7 with row 10) and rho mutant (compare row 9 with row 12) strains. One likely explanation for these results is that the in-frame pabB deletion associated with fusion 1 removed a previously unidentified promoter that was not subject to translation-mediated displacement of bound TRAP.
Primer extension experiments were carried out using total cellular RNA to map the 5' ends of transcripts within the region delineated by the deletion endpoints from fusion 1. A single primer extension product was identified (Fig. 3A). A likely
A-dependent promoter (PtrpG) was identified just upstream that matched the 35 and 10 consensus sequences in four of six and five of six positions, respectively. The spacing between the 35 and 10 sequences matched the 17-nt consensus (Fig. 3B). In vitro transcription reactions using purified B. subtilis RNAP confirmed that this was a
A-dependent promoter (Fig. 3C).
![]() View larger version (50K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Identification of a new trpG promoter. (A) Primer extension mapping of the 5' end of the trpG transcript. Total RNA was isolated from a WT B. subtilis strain, hybridized to an end-labeled DNA primer, and subsequently extended with MMLV reverse transcriptase. Sequencing reactions were performed using the same end-labeled DNA primer. An arrow marks the single reverse transcriptase product corresponding to the 5' end of the transcript originating from PtrpG. (B) A trpG promoter sequence. The trpG promoter sequences (35 and 10) and the transcription start site (+1) are marked. (C) In vitro transcription analysis of the trpG promoter, using A-containing B. subtilis RNAP. Lane 1, no-template control; lane 2, DNA restriction fragment template giving rise to a 150-nt trpG transcript; lane 3, PCR-derived template giving rise to a 113-nt trpG transcript; lane 4, PCR-derived template giving rise to a 139-nt control transcript.
|
mtrB strain (Table 4, row 14), nor was expression influenced by the rho mutation (compare row 13 with row 15). In this case, TRAP-dependent inhibition was 50-fold (250/5). Expression from fusion 3 was not subject to translation-mediated displacement of bound TRAP; expression levels were not altered by the engineered stop codon in the WT or the
mtrB or rho mutant strain (Table 4, compare row 13 with row 16, row 14 with row 17, and row 15 with row 18). Taken together, our results establish that trpG transcription initiates from two promoters (PpabB and PtrpG), that transcription levels are considerably higher from PtrpG than from PpabB, and that only transcripts originating from PpabB are subject to translation-mediated displacement of bound TRAP.
One would expect that the expression levels of fusion 1 (PpabB) and fusion 3 (PtrpG) would add up to the expression level of fusion 2, containing both promoters. In the absence of added tryptophan (Trp), the combined expression levels of fusions 1 and 3 were similar to the expression level of fusion 2 in all strains (Table 4). However, in the presence of added tryptophan (+Trp), the combined expression levels of fusions 1 and 3 in the WT strains (with or without the stop codon) were two- to threefold lower than those from fusion 2. Note that this discrepancy was not observed for the
mtrB or rho mutant strain. While we do not have an explanation for this observation for the WT strains, we have ruled out mRNA stability as a source of this apparent discrepancy (data not shown).
|
|
|---|
Two promoters control the transcription of trpG. The PpabB promoter is located just upstream from pabB (Fig. 1A), while PtrpG is located
250 bp upstream from the trpG initiation codon within the 3' end of the pabB coding sequence (Fig. 2 and 3). Expression from PtrpG is considerably higher than expression from PpabB (Table 4). Furthermore, our results indicate that translation-mediated displacement of bound TRAP can only occur for transcripts originating from PpabB. One physiological role for this translation displacement mechanism would be to ensure a sufficient level of TrpG synthesis to maintain folic acid biosynthesis in the presence of excess tryptophan; expression from fusion 1, which is only driven by PpabB, is low when cells are grown in the presence of excess tryptophan (Table 4). However, the presence of PtrpG would appear to be sufficient to maintain folic acid biosynthesis under excess tryptophan growth conditions (Table 4, fusion 3). While our initial hypothesis was that translation-mediated displacement of bound TRAP would provide an answer for how translation of trpG can be regulated less tightly than that of trpP, despite TRAP having a higher affinity for the trpG message, it is apparent that this mechanism can only partially explain this dichotomy (Tables 2 and 3). Perhaps PtrpG evolved relatively recently and at one time PpabB was the only available promoter for trpG expression. Thus, it is possible that the translation-mediated displacement mechanism was necessary for survival at some point during the evolution of B. subtilis. It is also possible that transcription initiation from these promoters is differentially regulated. While it was previously shown that folate operon transcript levels increased markedly when stationary-phase cells were diluted in fresh medium (9), it is unclear whether PpabB, PtrpG, or both were responsible for the increased expression.
Of the various Bacillus species for which sequence information is available for the trp and folate operons, B. subtilis, Bacillus licheniformis, Bacillus halodurans, and Bacillus clausii contain TRAP. In each of these organisms, a single trpG (pabA) gene is located immediately downstream from pabB in the folate operon. It appears that the internal PtrpG promoter is conserved in all four organisms (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). Examination of the pabB-trpG intercistronic region reveals the presence of appropriately spaced triplet repeats such that TRAP would be capable of inhibiting translation of trpG. Moreover, the potential of ribosome-mediated displacement of bound TRAP from transcripts originating from PpabB is conserved as well; in each case, the majority of the triplet repeats that constitute the putative TRAP binding site lie upstream of or within the pabB stop codon (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material). Interestingly, the Bacillus species that do not contain TRAP have separate trpG and pabA genes. In these instances, trpG is the second gene of the trp operon, while pabA is immediately downstream of pabB in the folate operon. It appears that the internal PtrpG (PpabA) promoter is conserved in these species as well (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). The trp operons in the Bacillus species that do not contain TRAP are regulated by the T box antitermination mechanism, in which uncharged tryptophanyl tRNA binds to the untranslated leader and promotes transcription readthrough (15). Surprisingly, despite the absence of TRAP in these organisms, five appropriately spaced triplet repeats are present in the analogous pabB-pabA intercistronic region, like the case for the TRAP-regulated trpG (pabA) genes (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material).
We are not aware of any previous studies demonstrating the role of translation-mediated displacement of a specific RNA binding protein in regulating gene expression. However, translation-mediated displacement of RNA binding proteins has been implicated in the nonsense-mediated decay mechanism in eukaryotes. Nonsense-mediated decay rids eukaryotic cells of aberrant mRNAs containing premature termination codons. Premature stop codons are distinguished from true termination codons by downstream exon-exon junctions (17). It was shown that hUpf3 remains bound at exon-exon junctions following splicing. It was proposed that during the first round of translation, the progressing ribosome displaces hUpf3 and associated hUpf2 when bound upstream from the termination codon. If these proteins are not displaced, subsequent binding of hUpf1 triggers mRNA degradation (17). Using an in vitro system, it was shown that ribosome-mediated displacement of Y14, an RNA binding protein that is part of the exon-exon junction complex, occurs from translationally active mRNAs (10). More recently, it was suggested that movement of the ribosome along the mRNA might displace AUF1, a protein that promotes the rapid decay of AU-rich element-containing RNAs. This last mechanism would be distinct from those described above because these AU-rich elements are present in the 3'-untranslated regions of certain eukaryotic messages (16).
The precise mechanism or energy required for protein displacement has not been addressed in any of the studies just described. However, footprinting data indicate that the 5'- and 3'-most triplet repeats were least protected by bound TRAP (6, 28). A weak interaction between TRAP and the 3' triplet plays a critical role in the degradation of terminated trp operon leader RNA so that TRAP can be recycled (8). Thus, it is conceivable that a relatively weak interaction between TRAP and the 5'-most triplet repeat in the trpG transcript is important for translation-mediated displacement of bound TRAP. Disruption of the TRAP interaction with the first repeat by the ribosome would generate a new 5'-most TRAP-bound triplet (i.e., the second repeat). Sequential disruption of TRAP interaction with each repeat by the translating ribosome may ultimately lead to TRAP dissociation and, hence, translation of trpG.
Published ahead of print on 17 November 2006. ![]()
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://jb.asm.org/. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»