Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, February 2007, p. 1464-1467, Vol. 189, No. 4
0021-9193/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JB.01153-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pharmacology & Drug Discovery, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California 92093
Received 28 July 2006/ Accepted 4 October 2006
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Proteins targeted for cell surface expression in GBS are predicted to share a C-terminal sequence (L/IPXTG) for sortase recognition and anchoring to the gram-positive cell wall, and we have examined candidate genes encoding this motif for roles in the cellular pathogenesis of GBS meningitis. Serotype V GBS clinical isolate NCTC10/84 is highly virulent in the mouse model of hematogenous meningitis (2), and our PCR and sequence analysis of this strain revealed a locus encoding the transcriptional regulator RogB (5), three genes encoding proteins with C-terminal L/IPXTG anchor motifs, and two candidate sortase enzyme genes (Fig. 1A). Compared to loci present in the sequenced GBS strains NEM316 (4) and 2603V/R (15), in which the corresponding L/IPXTG-anchored proteins have been demonstrated to be components of pilus appendages (3, 10), this locus exhibited a high level of sequence identity and had a similar position in the chromosome. Comparison of our locus with the previous reports suggested that the second L/IPXTG-anchored protein (encoded by a gene designated pilB) could represent the major pilus subunit. Homologues of other pilus genes at a second pilus locus found in several other GBS strains (10) were not detected in the NCTC10/84 strain.
![]() View larger version (69K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. (A) Schematic diagram of the NCTC10/84 GBS pil locus containing pilA, pilB, and pilC compared to previously characterized pilus loci in strains NEM316 (3) and 2603R/V (10). (B) Transmission electron microscopy and negative staining of pilus-like structures (indicated by an arrow) on the cell surface of GBS strain NCTC10/84. (C) Immunogold labeling and transmission electron microscopy with mouse sera against GBS59 (PilB). NCTC10/84 was immobilized on Formvar-carbon copper grids precoated with fibronectin (1%) and stained with specific antisera and 6-nm colloidal gold-conjugated anti-mouse immunoglobulin G antibody. (D) Higher magnification of the area indicated in panel C. Scale bars = 100 nm.
|
To verify the presence of pili on the surface of GBS test strain NCTC10/84, we performed negative staining transmission electron microscopy of intact bacterial cells. Briefly, bacterial suspensions were deposited on Formvar-carbon copper grids precoated with 1% fibronectin. Adherent bacteria were subsequently fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde, washed three times for 5 min in water, and stained with 2% acidic uranyl acetate. As shown in Fig. 1B, characteristic fibrous organelles, or pili, extending from the bacterial surface were visualized. To demonstrate the association of PilB with these structures, we performed immunogold labeling essentially as described previously (10) using mouse antisera raised against recombinant GBS59 (PilB) protein (a generous gift from Guido Grandi, Immaculada Margarit, and colleagues, Novartis/Chiron Vaccines, Siena, Italy). Gold particles were localized on the GBS surface in pilus-like appendages (Fig. 1C and D). No immunogold labeling was observed using preimmune antisera (data not shown).
To probe the functional role of PilA and PilB, we generated knockout mutants of GBS strain NCTC10/84 with mutations in each gene by precise, in-frame allelic replacement with a chloramphenicol resistance cassette using our established methods (6). These mutant strains exhibited growth kinetics equivalent to those of the wild-type (WT) GBS parent strain in Todd-Hewitt broth and the RPMI-based culture medium used in our in vitro assays. Additionally, no differences were observed between the WT and mutant strains with respect to ß-hemolysin/cytolysin activity or sensitivity to the penicillin and gentamicin concentrations used in our invasion assays (data not shown). The GBS
pilA and GBS
pilB mutants were analyzed using our well-characterized in vitro model of the BBB (2, 9), consisting of hBMEC that maintains the morphological and functional characteristics of primary brain endothelial cells (7, 12). Cell maintenance and quantitative assays for GBS hBMEC adherence and invasion were performed as described previously (9). Briefly, invasion of hBMEC by GBS was quantified using a standard antibiotic protection assay in which intracellular organisms were recovered and enumerated after selective killing of extracellular bacteria by antibiotic treatment. To assess the level of surface-adherent (total cell-associated) bacteria for the mutant and WT strains, bacteria were quantified from hBMEC monolayers prior to the addition of extracellular antibiotics. The data were expressed as percentages of adherence or invasion based on the original inoculum (105 CFU; multiplicity of infection, 1 to 3 bacteria/cell) and then were normalized to levels calculated for the WT GBS strain. As shown in Fig. 2A, the GBS
pilA mutant was 60% less adherent to hBMEC than the WT strain, while for the GBS
pilB mutant there was not a significant change in adherence. Conversely, when strains were analyzed to determine their abilities to invade hBMEC, the GBS
pilB mutant exhibited a significant reduction in invasion (40%) compared to the invasion by the WT and GBS
pilA strains. Thus, it appears that the PilA protein contributes to the initial attachment of GBS to brain endothelium, while the PilB protein contributes to the process of bacterial internalization.
![]() View larger version (25K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. GBS PilA and PilB contribute to hBMEC adherence and invasion. (A) GBS WT, mutant, and complemented strains were incubated with hBMEC at a multiplicity of infection of 1 to 3 for 30 min, after which adherent or total cell-associated bacteria were isolated and enumerated. (B) Intracellular organisms were quantified following 2 h of incubation with hBMEC and 2 h of incubation with penicillin (5 µg/ml) and gentamicin (100 µg/ml) to kill extracellular bacteria. The percentages of total cell-associated and invasive bacteria were calculated on the basis of the initial inoculum and are expressed relative to the value for the WT GBS strain. (C and D) Adherence (C) and invasion (D) assays were performed using L. lactis expressing vector alone or the cloned GBS pilA and pilB genes. All data are data from a representative experiment, and at least three experiments were performed. The error bars indicate the 95% confidence intervals of the means of three wells. The differences in the values for recovered bacteria were analyzed by Student's t test, and the data were compared to data for the parent strain or for other strains as indicated by brackets (one asterisk, P < 0.05; two asterisks, P < 0.005; three asterisks, P < 0.0005).
|
pilA and GBS
pilB mutants. Complementation of the
pilA and
pilB mutant strains with the corresponding genes on plasmid vectors reversed the observed adherence (PilA) and invasion (PilB) defects (Fig. 2A and B). The presence of the vector-only control in the
pilA and
pilB mutant strains did not affect the recovery of adherent or intracellular bacteria (data not shown). To determine if the pilA and pilB genes are sufficient for hBMEC adherence and invasion, the pDCpilA and pDCpilB constructs were used to transform the nonpathogenic, noninvasive, gram-positive bacterium Lactococcus lactis. The empty pDCerm expression vector in L. lactis served as a control. Heterologous expression of the pilA gene in L. lactis resulted in a dramatic increase (
20-fold) in adherence to hBMEC (Fig. 2C), while similar expression of pilB increased the ability of this nonpathogen to invade hBMEC
55-fold (Fig. 2D). Together, our results demonstrate that pilA is necessary and sufficient for hBMEC adherence, while pilB is necessary and sufficient for hBMEC invasion.
In summary, here we provide evidence that genes encoding surface-associated pili play a role in the ability of GBS to adhere to and invade brain endothelium. Pili and pilus assembly have been best described in gram-negative bacteria, where pili are known to mediate host-pathogen interactions important in colonization or the development of disease (11), and it is likely that they have a similar function in gram-positive pathogens (13). Our results suggest that the GBS PilA protein contributes to initial attachment to hBMEC as the GBS
pilA mutant was less adherent to host cells. These results are consistent with recent work demonstrating that the PilA homologue GBS 1478, but not the PilB homologue GBS 1477 (Fig. 1A), promoted adhesion to human pulmonary epithelial cells (3). The GBS
pilA mutant did not exhibit a decrease in invasive ability compared to the WT strain. It is possible that the absence of PilA from the pilus structure results in increased interactions between PilB and hBMEC. Our results also demonstrate that PilB, a major pilus component, mediates GBS intracellular invasion of brain endothelium, a critical step in BBB penetration during GBS meningitis. We speculate that bacterial pilus components, including PilA and potentially PilC, promote the initial contact and attachment of GBS to host cell surfaces, which is followed by PilB-mediated initiation of bacterial internalization. The mechanism by which pili and pilus proteins facilitate bacterial invasion of host cells remains to be determined. Future examinations of the role of these specialized surface appendages in the pathogenesis of central nervous system infection by GBS and other pilus-expressing meningeal pathogens (e.g., Streptococcus pneumoniae) are merited.
This work was supported by an NSF Graduate Research Fellowship to H.C.M., by an American Heart Association Established Investigator Award to V.N., and by a Burroughs Wellcome Fund Career Award and grant R01 NS051247-01A1 from the NINDS/NIH to K.S.D.
Published ahead of print on 13 October 2006. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»