Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, March 2007, p. 1765-1773, Vol. 189, No. 5
0021-9193/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JB.00776-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences,1 Division of Biology,2 Howard Hughes Medical Institute, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California3
Received 30 May 2006/ Accepted 12 December 2006
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
As a step toward this general goal, we have chosen to focus on the process of phototrophic Fe(II) oxidation, which can be described by the following equation: 4Fe2+ + CO2 + 11H2O + h
= [CH2O] + 4Fe(OH)3 + 8H+. This type of photosynthesis is interesting in the context of metabolic evolution for several reasons. First, phototrophic Fe(II) oxidation is phylogenetically widespread, appearing in purple and green bacteria (10, 14, 21, 22, 65, 66); phylogenic comparisons of genes from different photosynthetic organisms suggest that anoxygenic photosynthesis is more ancient than oxygenic photosynthesis (57, 72). Second, iron has an intermediate redox potential (
E0' = 0.11 V) (28) compared to other substrates used as electron donors in photosynthesis [e.g., H2 (
E0' = 0.41 V) or H2O (
E0' = 0.82 V)] (28, 44). It has been suggested, therefore, that Fe(II)-based photosynthesis may represent a transition form of metabolism from anoxygenic to oxygenic photosynthesis (57). Third, Fe(II) is thought to have been the most widespread source of reducing power in the late Archean and early Proterozoic (3.8 to 1.6 billion years ago) with an estimated concentration of about 0.1 to 1 mM in seawater (69); atmospheric oxygen seems to have appeared in significant amounts only after 2.4 billion years ago (Ga) (15, 26, 30, 60).
Banded iron formations (BIFs) are an ancient class of iron ore deposits that may record the story of the evolution of photosynthesis. Because the use of Fe(II) results in the production of ferric iron [Fe(III)] minerals, it has been suggested that Fe(II)-based phototrophy might have been responsible for catalyzing BIF deposition early in Earth history (14, 34, 71). Later occurrences of BIFs (e.g., at 1.8 Ga), however, are believed to have resulted from Fe(II) oxidation catalyzed by molecular oxygen produced by cyanobacteria. Episodic deposition of BIFs throughout the Precambrian thus may reflect a transition from anoxygenic to oxygenic photosynthesis. How did ancient phototrophs evolve from using Fe(II) as an electron donor to using H2O?
To address this question, we must understand the molecular machinery of phototrophic Fe(II) oxidation. Discovered in the early 1990s by Widdel and coworkers (71), phototrophic Fe(II)-oxidizing bacteria such as Thiodictyon, Rhodobacter, and Chlorobium species have been isolated from a wide variety of environments, including both freshwater and marine settings (14, 21, 29, 66, 71). However, very little is understood at the molecular level about the mechanism of Fe(II) oxidation in any of these organisms. In the companion paper to this article, we report the discovery of a c-type cytochrome and a putative pyrroloquinoline quinone-containing enzyme from an Fe(II)-oxidizing strainRhodobacter sp. strain SW2that stimulate Fe(II) oxidation activity in its close relative Rhodobacter capsulatus SB1003 (11). Because our ability to explore the mechanistic basis of Fe(II) oxidation in SW2 is limited because of the impracticality of direct mutational analysis (11), we established a genetic system in a different Fe(II)-oxidizing phototroph, Rhodopseudomonas palustris TIE-1 (28). In this report, we describe the identification of the pio operon, a three-gene operon essential for phototrophic growth on Fe(II) by R. palustris TIE-1.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study
|
Cell suspension assay.
All cell suspension assays were conducted at room temperature in an anaerobic chamber containing an atmosphere of 80% N2, 15% CO2, and 5% H2 (12, 28). Fe(II) cultures used for this assay contained 10 mM nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA) to prevent ferric iron precipitation. NTA alone does not support phototrophic growth of R. palustris (data not shown). Cells were pregrown in the medium indicated until mid-exponential phase to an optical density (OD) at 660 nm of
0.3 measured by 96-well plate reader (Synergy HT; Bio-Tek, Winooski, VT) with a volume of 200 µl. Cells were harvested by centrifugation (10,000 x g for 15 min) and washed in the same volume of HEPES buffer (50 mM HEPES, 20 mM NaCl, pH 7.0). To start the assay, cells were resuspended in HEPES buffer containing 20 mM NaHCO3 and either 400 µM or 1 mM (as indicated in Fig. 1) FeCl2. Cells were concentrated approximately three times compared to the original growth culture, and 100 µl of the cell suspension was aliquoted into a 96-well plate. The OD measured by the 96-well plate reader was about 0.7. The plates were incubated at room temperature in a glove box under a 40-W tungsten light with a light intensity of about 3,000 lx. Over time, 100 µl of ferrozine solution (1 g of ferrozine plus 500 g of ammonia acetate in 1 liter of double-distilled H2O) was added to the wells to monitor Fe(II) levels (64). The rate of Fe(II) oxidation was calculated on the basis of the linear portion of the curves generated.
![]() View larger version (20K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Fe(II) oxidation activity of R. palustris TIE-1 tested by a cell suspension assay with cells pregrown phototrophically with Fe(II), H2, or thiosulfate as the electron donor. Approximately 5 x 109 cells/ml were used in the cell suspension assay. Compared to the H2- or thiosulfate-grown cells, Fe(II)-grown cells showed a four- to fivefold higher rate of Fe(II) oxidation activity, suggesting that specific proteins were induced under Fe(II)-grown conditions.
|
Reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR.
R. palustris TIE-1 was grown photoautotrophically on Fe(II) plus NTA until exponential phase. Total RNA was extracted as described previously (56). Briefly, cells were harvested and resuspended in 1 ml TE buffer (10 mM Tris/HCl, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0). Cells were disrupted with a Mini-BeadBeater-8 (BioSpec Products, Bartlesville, OK) in 2-ml screw-cap tubes containing approximately 1 ml of 0.1-mm zirconia-silica beads (BioSpec) for 1-min periods with cooling on ice after each period for a total of 4 min. RNA extraction was then carried out with a QIAGEN RNA extraction kit. DNase digestion was performed on the Mini-column with the QIAGEN RNase-free DNase set. The RNA was eluted from the column, and a second DNase treatment was performed with Roche RNase-free DNase. The RNA was finally resuspended in 40 µl nuclease-free water. cDNA was synthesized with a Bio-Rad iScript cDNA synthesis kit. A control PCR with RNA as the template in the absence of reverse transcriptase confirmed that the isolated RNA was free of contaminating genomic DNA. The primers used for all RT-PCRs are listed in Table 2. To test if pioABC were cotranscribed, primers RT-pioA-L1 and RT-pioB-R1 were used to detect the presence of transcript pioAB and primers RT-pioB-L1 and RT-pioC-R1 were used to detect transcript pioBC. To test the transcription of pio genes in the
pioA,
pioB, or
pioC mutant background, we used RT-pioAL and RT-pioAR to detect pioA, RT-pioBL and RT-pioBR to detect pioB, and RT-pioCL and RT-pioCR to detect pioC.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Sequences of the oligonucleotides used in this study
|
Construction of deletion mutant.
All primer sequences used in construction of the mutants are listed in Table 2. For construction of pio operon deletion mutant TIE-3, a 1-kb DNA fragment upstream of pioA was produced by PCR with primers pioA1 and pioA1p with TIE-1 genomic DNA as the template. Similarly, a 1-kb PCR fragment downstream of pioC was generated with primers pioC2 and pioC2p. The PCR products were used as templates for another round of fusion PCR with primers pioA1 and pioC2. The resulting 2-kb fusion PCR product was gel purified and restriction digested with restriction enzyme SpeI and cloned into the suicide vector pJQ200sk (59) to generate pYQABC. pYQABC was mobilized into TIE-1 by conjugation from E. coli S17-1 (13). Selection of single recombinants on PM plates containing 400 µg/ml gentamicin, followed by selection of double recombinants on PM sucrose (10%) plates, were conducted as previously described (13). Individual
pioA,
pioB, and
pioC gene deletion mutants were made in a similar manner via suicide plasmids pYQA, pYQB, and pYQC, respectively. The primers used for generating pYQA were pioA1, pioA1p, pioA2, and pioA2p; those used for pYQB were pioB1, pioB1p, pioB2, and pioB2p; and those used for pYQC were pioC1, pioC1p, pioC2, and pioC2p. PCR was used to verify that the expected deletion had occurred.
Generation of complementing plasmids. The pioABC operon and the individual pio genes were amplified from genomic DNA of TIE-1 with the FailSafe PCR kit (Epicenter, WI). The PCR products were designed to have EcoRI and HindIII restriction sites and were ligated in trans into vector pBBRMCS-2 (35, 36) digested with the same enzymes. The resulting plasmids were conjugated into the R. palustris strains indicated as previously described (28). The pioABC operon was amplified with primers pioA-start and pioC-end (pYQ01), the pioA gene was amplified with primers pioA-start and pioA-end (pYQ02), the pioB gene was amplified with primers pioB-start and pioB-end (pYQ03), and the pioC gene was amplified with primers pioC-start and pioC-end (pYQ04).
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers. The DNA sequences of pioA, pioB, and pioC were deposited in the GenBank database under accession numbers EF119739, EF119740, and EF119741, respectively.
|
|
|---|
40 kDa) appeared in significant quantity in the soluble fraction only when cells were grown on Fe(II). Protein identification by mass spectrometry indicated that peptide fragments of this protein match those of a putative decaheme c-type cytochrome from R. palustris CGA009 (encoded by gene RPA0746) (39).
![]() View larger version (42K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Heme staining of crude cell extract and soluble and membrane proteins of TIE-1 grown on Fe(II), H2, and thiosulfate, separated by SDS-PAGE. A c-type cytochrome ( 40 kDa), indicated by the black arrow, is highly expressed in the soluble fraction of Fe(II)-grown cells. Approximately 100 mg of protein was loaded per lane. The dark diagonal line in the "soluble-fraction thio" lane is a tear in the gel. std, standard.
|
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Organization of the pio genes on the R. palustris TIE-1 chromosome. Arrows indicate the direction of transcription. The gene numbers corresponding to these genes in R. palustris CGA009 are given. The small black arrows A, B, C, and D indicate the locations of primers used for RT-PCR experiments. PCR products were obtained for both of the regions between the pio genes, indicating that they constitute an operon. RT reactions, lanes 1 and 5; control with no reverse transcriptase added to cDNA, lanes 2 and 6; TIE-1 genomic DNA control, lanes 3 and 7; no-template control, lanes 4 and 8.
|
The second ORF, pioB, is 99 nucleotides downstream of pioA. pioB encodes a protein of 810 amino acids and contains a putative signal peptide with a predicted cleavage site between residues 25 and 26 on the basis of the SignalP program, suggesting that it is also secreted through the Sec pathway. It has a putative porin motif close to the C terminus according to InterProScan (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/InterProScan/) and is predicted to be an outer membrane ß-barrel protein according to the Transmembrane Barrel Hunt (20) and PRED-TMBB programs (3). Comparison of PioB to sequences in the databases revealed similarities to several outer membrane proteins from Shewanella and Geobacter species. In particular, it has 21% identity and 38% similarity over 536 amino acids close to the C terminus of outer membrane protein MtrB from S. oneidensis MR-1, which is involved in metal [e.g., Fe(III) and Mn(IV)] reduction (4, 51). However, approximately 120 amino acids at the N terminus show no homology to anything in the database. According to the secondary structure predicted by PRED-TMBB (3), both PioB and MtrB are outer membrane porins with 28 transmembrane beta strands, the largest number of beta strands among all known outer membrane porins (9, 33, 62). Similar to other outer membrane porins, PioB and MtrB are predicted to have long loops protruding into the extracellular space and short turns on the periplasmic side, except that PioB has longer extracellular loops than MtrB, consistent with the sequence length difference between the two proteins. The conserved regions between PioB and MtrB mainly occur in the transmembrane regions, consistent with the idea that these regions are generally more conserved than the loop regions among outer membrane porins (62).
The third ORF, pioC, is 140 nucleotides downstream of pioB. pioC encodes a putative high potential iron-sulfur protein (HiPIP) that contains an iron-sulfur binding site. The deduced amino acid sequence of pioC consists of 94 amino acids with a predicted Tat signal sequence at the N terminus, suggesting export into the periplasm through the Tat protein translocation pathway. A signal sequence cleavage site was predicted between residues 37 and 38 on the basis of the SignalP program. Because there is no transmembrane region other than the signal peptide predicted by HMMTOP (http://www.enzim.hu/hmmtop/html/submit.html), we predict that PioC resides in the periplasm. Comparison of PioC to sequences in the database reveals similarities to HiPIPs from several bacteria, with most of the similarity occurring over approximately 50 amino acid residues close to the C terminus spanning the iron-sulfur cluster binding site. PioC is 47% identical and 52% similar over 48 amino acids to a HiPIP from Rhodopila globiformis (1), is 32% identical to a hypothetical protein encoded by gene RPA3566 from R. palustris CGA009, and is 44% identical and 53% similar over 51 amino acids to a HiPIP from Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, a putative iron oxidoreductase known as the "Iro" protein (19, 37).
pioABC are specifically required for phototrophic Fe(II) oxidation. To determine whether the pio operon is necessary for growth on Fe(II), we constructed a mutant (TIE-3) in which all three genes in the pio operon were deleted from the chromosome by homologous recombination. We tested the ability of mutant TIE-3 to grow on different substrates. When Fe(II) was provided as the electron donor for photoautotrophic growth, very little Fe(II) was oxidized by strain TIE-3 in a period of 2 weeks (Fig. 4A). In contrast, wild-type strain TIE-1 oxidized Fe(II) to completion within this time period. Endpoint measurements of total protein content in the cultures indicated that TIE-3 did not grow over the course of incubation, in contrast to TIE-1 (Fig. 4A). To determine if TIE-3 was specifically defective for growth on Fe(II), we tested growth on substrates other than Fe(II). Photoautotrophic growth of TIE-3 on H2 or thiosulfate and photoheterotrophic growth on acetate were tested by measuring cell OD. TIE-3 grew on these substrates as well as TIE-1 (Table 3). These results indicate that the pioABC operon is essential and specific for growth on Fe(II).
![]() View larger version (15K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. (A) Defect in growth and phototrophic Fe(II) oxidation in the pio operon deletion mutant TIE-3. Data are representative of triplicate cultures. Whereas TIE-1 oxidized Fe(II) to completion in 2 weeks, very little Fe(II) was oxidized by TIE-3. Endpoint measurements of total protein content in these cultures revealed that TIE-3 did not grow during the course of incubation, in contrast to TIE-1. (B) TIE-3 is defective in Fe(II) oxidation activity measured by the cell suspension assay compared to TIE-1. Complementation with the pio operon on a plasmid (pYQ01) restored TIE-3's Fe(II) oxidation activity to about 50% of that of TIE-1, whereas a vector (pBBRMCS-2) control had no effect (data not shown).
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Comparison of the doubling times of R. palustris TIE-1 and TIE-3 grown on different substrates
|
Because the pio operon is so highly conserved between strains CGA009 and TIE-1, we checked whether the pio operon also confers Fe(II) oxidation on CGA010. Deletion of the genes corresponding to pioABC (i.e., RPA0746, RPA0745, and RPA0744) in CGA010 resulted in a large defect in Fe(II) oxidation activity (data not shown), similar to that observed in TIE-1. Strain CGA010 shows a similar amount of Fe(II) oxidation activity in the cell suspension assay as H2-grown TIE-1. However, it does not show measurable growth over the same time period as TIE-1; therefore, we chose to work with strain TIE-1 for further analysis.
To access the relative importance of the individual pio genes for Fe(II) oxidation, we constructed three individual deletion mutants,
pioA,
pioB, and
pioC. We confirmed that the mutations were nonpolar by RT-PCR (data not shown) with the primers listed in Table 2. Neither growth nor Fe(II) oxidation occurred for any of these mutants during a growth assay on Fe(II) (Fig. 5); growth of these mutants on other substrates such as H2, thiosulfate, or acetate was unaffected (data not shown). In contrast,
pioA lost almost all Fe(II) oxidation activity in the cell suspension assay with H2-grown cells, similar to TIE-3, whereas
pioB and
pioC only partially lost Fe(II) oxidation activity, exhibiting approximately 10% and 40% of the initial wild-type rate of Fe(II) oxidation (Fig. 6A). The partial defect in Fe(II) oxidation by
pioC may be explained by functional substitution of other small soluble electron carriers in the cell (e.g., the other HiPIP encoded by the homolog of RPA3566). Complementation by the respective wild-type copies of the genes restored Fe(II) oxidation activity to different extents in the mutants. In comparing the total amounts of Fe(II) oxidized after 12 h, complementation of
pioA,
pioB, and
pioC resulted in 85, 60, and 99% of that achieved by TIE-1 in the same amount of time (Fig. 6B). The reason for the relatively low extent of complementation for
pioB compared to TIE-1 is not clear. Perhaps it is caused by different levels of expression of pioB when expressed on a vector driven by a nonnative promoter versus when expressed from the endogenous promoter. Together, these results indicate that all three Pio proteins are required for full Fe(II) oxidation activity in R. palustris TIE-1.
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Fe(II) oxidation by individual pio deletion mutants ( pioA, pioB, and pioC) when Fe(II) is provided as the sole electron donor. Data are representative of triplicate cultures. Whereas the wild type (TIE-1) oxidized Fe(II) to completion within 3 weeks, very little Fe(II) was oxidized by each mutant. No growth occurred for any of these mutants on the basis of measurement of protein content (data not shown).
|
![]() View larger version (14K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. (A) Fe(II) oxidation activity by individual pio deletion mutants ( pioA, pioB, and pioC) in the cell suspension assay. pioA lost nearly all of its Fe(II) oxidation activity, similar to the pio operon deletion mutant TIE-3. The pioB and pioC mutants showed approximately 10% and 40% of the activity of TIE-1 [as measured by calculating the rate of Fe(II) oxidation in the linear portion of the curve]. Data represent the mean ± standard deviation of three independent cultures. (B) Complementation by the respective wild-type copies of the pio genes restored Fe(II) oxidation activity to different extents in the mutants. In comparing the total amounts of Fe(II) oxidized after 12 h, complementation of pioA, pioB, and pioC resulted in 85, 60, and 99% of that achieved by TIE-1 in the same amount of time.
|
|
|
|---|
c-type cytochromes with a wide range of redox potentials are involved in Fe(II) oxidation by A. ferrooxidans (2, 68, 76, 77) and Rhodobacter sp. strain SW2 (11), as well as dissimilatory Fe(III) reduction by Shewanella and Geobacter species (4, 40, 42, 43, 73). Consistent with this, we found a c-type cytochrome to be upregulated when R. palustris TIE-1 was grown photoautotrophically on Fe(II). By reverse genetic analysis, we identified a three-gene operon (the pio operon) that seems likely to encode the phototrophic Fe(II) oxidoreductase complex. Detailed biochemical studies are needed to confirm this and understand the mechanism of electron transfer from Fe(II); however, on the basis of the results of this study, we can suggest potential functions for the Pio proteins.
The first gene in the pio operon encodes PioA, a putative decaheme c-type cytochrome. Because the
pioA mutant lost almost all of its Fe(II) oxidation activity, similar to the pio operon deletion mutant TIE-3, this suggests that PioA plays an essential role during Fe(II) oxidation. We postulate that it receives electrons directly from Fe(II), serving as the Fe(II) oxidoreductase. This function would be analogous to that of c-type cytochromes in S. oneidensis and in A. ferrooxidans (2, 54) that serve as the electron donor to Fe(III) and direct electron acceptors from Fe(II), respectively. Although confirmation of protein localization is necessary, sequence analyses suggest that PioA is a soluble protein that resides in the periplasm.
The second gene in the operon encodes PioB, a putative outer membrane beta barrel protein with no obvious redox active prosthetic groups. While not as severe as the phenotype produced by
pioA, deletion of pioB caused a large defect in Fe(II) oxidation, suggesting that PioB also plays an important role in this process. We suggest that it functions as an iron transporter, given its similarity to other known outer membrane porins (55, 62) and its lack of redox-cofactor binding motifs. However, neither the transport direction nor the substrate [e.g., an Fe(II) or Fe(III) complex] of PioB is known. The closest relative of PioB is MtrB from S. oneidensis MR-1, which is involved in dissimilatory Fe(III) reduction (4, 48, 51, 52, 54). It has been suggested that MtrB helps localize the Fe(III) reductase complex in S. oneidensis MR-1 to the outside of the cell (51). By analogy, it is also possible that PioB may assist in the localization of other proteins involved in Fe(II) oxidation that remain to be identified.
The third gene in the operon encodes PioC, a putative HiPIP. Given that PioC is required for growth on Fe(II), we suggest that it functions as an electron carrier from PioA to the photosynthetic reaction center (RC). On the basis of the measured redox potential of a HiPIP (0.345 V) from Rhodopseudomonas marina (23, 47), the calculated iron couple Fe(OH)3-Fe2+ (1.1 V) (28) and the measured RC (0.4 to 0.5 V) in purple bacteria (57), a HiPIP is a reasonable candidate for this function because its redox potential falls between those of the iron couple and the RC. Spectroscopic and kinetic experiments have shown that HiPIPs can mediate electron transfer to the RC directly or via an RC-bound cytochrome in various purple bacteria (24, 25, 45, 46, 61). In this way, HiPIPs can functionally substitute for cytochrome c2, a common electron carrier in the periplasm of purple bacteria that shuttles electrons between the cytochrome bc1 complex and the RC during cyclic electron flow (47). In the case of R. palustris CGA009, genome annotation predicts the presence of cytochrome c2 (encoded by gene RPA1535), along with another HiPIP (encoded by gene RPA3566). The fact that
pioC does not have a phototrophic growth defect on H2 suggests that PioC has a function specific for Fe(II) phototrophy. Interestingly, a HiPIP has been demonstrated to serve as the electron acceptor for a thiosulfate-tetrathionate oxidoreductase during phototrophic growth of Chromatium vinosum on thiosulfate (18). PioC is also homologous to a HiPIP (Iro) found in A. ferrooxidans, an acidophilic Fe(II)-oxidizing bacterium that couples Fe(II) oxidation to the reduction of oxygen at low pH. Because of its high redox potential, its in vitro ability to oxidize Fe(II) and donate electrons to cytochrome c552, and its stability under acidic conditions, Iro was proposed to catalyze Fe(II) oxidation in A. ferrooxidans (19, 37); whether this applies in vivo has been disputed, however (76, 77). Nevertheless, the finding that a HiPIP is involved in Fe(II) oxidation in both R. palustris and A. ferrooxidans suggests some evolutionary relationship between the two Fe(II) oxidation systems.
In summary, the pio operon appears to encode proteins that are responsible for Fe(II) oxidation in R. palustris TIE-1. Determining their cellular localization will be important for gaining insight into how this organism traffics in iron. Although much is understood about iron acquisition for assimilatory purposes when iron is limiting (70), R. palustris presents an opportunity to understand the opposite problem: how does a cell dispose of Fe(III) when it is growing on Fe(II)? Interestingly, in phototrophic Fe(II)-oxidizing bacteria, the Fe(III) mineral product appears to be deposited exclusively outside the cell (28, 29); this makes sense because precipitation of ferric minerals inside the cell could be fatal given the highly insoluble nature of Fe(III) at neutral pH. If our predictions are correct and the Fe(II) oxidoreductase complex resides in the periplasm, how then does the cell avoid this problem? Are there specific ligands that keep Fe(III) soluble? Or are there protein complexes that bind and transport Fe(III) out of the cell so efficiently that internal ferric mineral precipitation is precluded? We hope that future biochemical studies of the Pio proteins and their associated partners will address these questions.
This work was supported by grants from the Packard Foundation and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute to D.K.N.
Published ahead of print on 22 December 2006. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»