Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, March 2007, p. 2219-2225, Vol. 189, No. 6
0021-9193/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JB.01470-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Nanotechnology Centre, School of Engineering,1 School of Medicine, University of Wales Swansea, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, United Kingdom2
Received 18 September 2006/ Accepted 18 December 2006
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
For many years, electron microscopy has been the only technique available for examining microbial surfaces at high resolution (2, 3), and, combined with cryotechniques, this allows fine-structure imaging of vitrified cell structures in conditions close to the native hydrated state (18, 22). However, these procedures are technically demanding and do not offer the opportunity for direct observation of living cells. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) is an established imaging technique that is an important and flexible tool for characterizing biological materials. This technique has a number of advantages over other microscopies as biological surfaces can be studied in real time with high resolution in different environments, gaseous or aqueous, with very little surface preparation and no surface coating. Thus, AFM has been used to give some very detailed images of microorganisms, including bacterial cells (9, 10). Here, we exploit AFM to characterize the surfaces of growing hyphae and spores of S. coelicolor. This offers a unique insight into the changes to the cell surface that accompany growth and morphological differentiation of this organism.
|
|
|---|
rdlAB (8), S. coelicolor
chpABCDH (7), S. coelicolor
chpABCDEFGH (8), and Streptomyces avermitilis 12804 (NCIMB, United Kingdom). To visualize vegetative and aerial growth, the strains were grown in the acute angle of a coverslip inserted in a sporulation medium, mannitol soy agar, as previously described (4, 16). Inserted coverslips were removed at different times of growth to visualize different developmental stages.
AFM.
The AFM instrument used was a Dimension 3100 (Nanoscope IV controller; Thermomicroscopes). S. coelicolor cells grown attached to glass coverslips were imaged in air (at 20°C and 40% rH). Hyphae at specific stages of development were first identified using the optical microscope attached to the AFM. AFM images were obtained using the intermittent contact mode of the instrument. Standard tapping mode tips (Olympus) were used (cantilever nominal spring constant, k = 0.064 N m1). A scan rate of 1 Hz was employed with resolution of 512 by 512 or 1,024 by 1,024 lines. Height and phase images were simultaneously recorded. Height images provide quantitative information on sample surface topography whereas phase images, although they do not represent the true topography of the sample, reveal a higher sensitivity to small surface features, resulting in images with greater detail, as previously observed (19). Phase images are derived from the phase angle between the actual vibration and the applied signal used to oscillate the AFM cantilever so that the tip intermittently taps the surface and reduces the lateral force that is applied during imaging. In this study we present largely phase images, except where stated. To quantify dimensions, multiple measurements were made on at least six independently grown biological samples. Unless otherwise stated, a mean value was derived; standard deviations were
17% of these mean values.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (128K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Progression of surface detail changes during vegetative growth of S. coelicolor. All images are phase images. (A) Germinating spore and germ tube. (B) Surface detail from panel A, displaying some roughness of the germ tube surface. (C) Vegetative hypha and growing branch, surrounded by extracellular matrix. (D) Higher magnification of the vegetative septum and extracellular matrix from panel C. (E and F) Initial stages of assembly of a fibrous layer, prior to aerial growth, with evident differences in the degree of fiber density. (G) High magnification of fibers of panel F, showing single and presumptive end-to-end, longer fibers. Scale bars are indicated in each panel.
|
Aerial development. In comparison to the vegetative hyphae, there are two striking differences in all images of aerial hyphae and spores obtained by tapping mode AFM; Fig. 2 shows representative images. First, for young aerial hyphae imaged after 30 h growth, there is an absence of the granulated extracellular matrix secreted around the vegetative hyphae, even though the aerial hyphae attach to the glass coverslip as they grow (they did not require attachment with poly-L-lysine prior to imaging, although, compared to the vegetative hyphae, aerial hyphae were reproducibly easier to dislodge by movement of the AFM tip). Second, the cell surfaces are composed entirely of a dense mosaic of short fibers. Assuming that the fibers are comprised of hydrophobic chaplin and/or rodlin proteins (see below), the layer surrounding the tip (Fig. 2B) can presumably help a young growing aerial hypha break the surface tension at the interface between a moist substrate and the air. Initially, the fibrous layer appears to be relatively disorganized (Fig. 2A and B). The disorganized fibrous material is evidently sloughed off during growth (Fig. 2D), implying that it is only loosely attached to the hyphal surface, leaving a more organized mosaic layer on the surface of older hyphae. A fibrous layer is maintained during subsequent differentiation of an aerial hypha as a spore chain develops (Fig. 2C to H) but appears much more compact and organized on spores (compare Fig. 2A and H). Development of spore compartments occurs after growth arrest of an aerial hypha. Staining hyphae with probes to detect either chromosomal partitioning or cell wall synthesis, coupled with fluorescence microscopy, has revealed synchronous multiple septum formation along aerial hyphae as uninucleoid spore compartments are formed (20). The first indications of cell wall changes accompanying spore formation revealed by AFM are regularly spaced surface indentations in apical regions of hyphae (Fig. 2D); the spacing between indentations is on average 1.2 µm, consistent with the spacing between sporulation septa detected by fluorescence microscopy (20). Subsequent modification of the fibrous layer occurs during cell division, presumably as a consequence of changes in the underlying cell wall (Fig. 2E and F). At this stage the mosaic of fibers is temporarily disrupted in a ring above the point of septation, revealing a smoother surface that we assume is the cell wall. Some of the disassembled fibrous material is deposited adjacent to the hyphae (Fig. 2F). However, as the spores subsequently round up, the mosaic layer is restored to completely cover the surface (Fig. 2H).
![]() View larger version (118K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Heterogeneity of the fibrous layers during aerial development of S. coelicolor. All images are phase images unless otherwise stated. (A) Disorganized fibrous layer of presporogenic aerial hypha. (B) An aerial hypha prior to sporulation septation, showing complete coverage of the tip by the fibrous layer. (C) Presporogenic hypha shedding fibrous material. (D) An aerial hypha shedding fibrous material and undergoing sporulation septation revealed by regular indentations on the surface. (E) A later stage of sporulation septation with localized disassembly of the fibrous layer above the position of cell division. (F) Lower magnification of localized disassembly of the fibrous layer at positions of cell division. (G) Three-dimensional image of a mature spore chain, displaying concavities and differences in rotational planes between spores. (H) Phase image of a spore chain showing a more compact rodlet layer (compared to panels A to C), concavities, and reassembly of the rodlet layer at the junctions between spores. Scale bars are indicated in each panel.
|
Characteristics of the fibrous layers are determined by rodlins and chaplins. The rodlet layer observed on the surface of spores and aerial hyphae using electron microscopy is believed to consist of fibrils of chaplin proteins organized by the two rodlin proteins, RdlA and RdlB, into individual rodlets (8). Using AFM, we examined the surface of 5-day-old hyphae of both a mutant lacking all eight chaplin genes and a mutant expressing only three chaplins, ChpEFG. The former resembles the immature substrate hyphae of the wild type in that no fibrous surface decoration is apparent (data not shown). The mutant expressing ChpEFG is covered in long fibrils 120 to 250 nm in length and 15 to 20 nm wide (Fig. 3A). However, a very large amount of this material is deposited on the glass surrounding the hyphae, suggesting that the missing chaplin proteins promote adhesion of the fibrous layer to the cell wall. A mutant expressing only ChpF and ChpG has similar characteristics (data not shown).
![]() View larger version (123K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Comparison of the fibrous layers of S. coelicolor chaplin and rodlin mutants and of S. avermitilis. All images are phase images unless otherwise stated. (A) Unstable fibrous layer of an aerial hypha of the chpABCDH mutant. (B) Scaly fibrous layer covering an aerial hypha of an rdlAB mutant. (C) Three-dimensional image of nondecorated spores of the rdlAB mutant. (D and E) Fibrous filaments coating presporogenic aerial hyphae of S. avermitilis. (F) Higher-magnification height image of extruded filaments from panel D, showing subunit detail. (G) Detail of the fibrous layer coating a spore chain of S. avermitilis. Scale bars are indicated in each panel.
|
Finally, again to assess the role of rodlin proteins, we turned our attention to another streptomycete, S. avermitilis. The genome of this organism has also been fully sequenced, and subsequent annotation revealed the presence of four chaplin genes but no orthologs of the S. coelicolor rodlin genes. The fibrous surface layer of this organism is quite distinct: developing hyphae extrude very long (up to 3 µm in length) filaments, 25 nm wide, that coat the hyphae and form networks on the surrounding substrate (Fig. 3D and E). These filaments appear to consist of shorter fibrous subunits, approximately 70 nm in length, arranged end to end (Fig. 3F). Obtaining high-resolution images of older sporulating hyphae proved problematic, possibly due to a mucous layer overlying the fibrous layer. However, the images obtained of spore chains revealed a surface consisting of a dense network of filaments (Fig. 3G).
|
|
|---|
A dense fibrous layer completely coats aerial hyphae. Previous analysis has indicated that all eight chaplin genes and the two rodlin genes are expressed specifically during aerial development (7, 8, 11). Our AFM analysis indicates that the nature of the outermost fibrous layer changes during aerial development. Initially, the layer is relatively disorganized (Fig. 2A and B) and comprises a heterogeneous assembly of rod-like fibers and more spherical scales. The latter, in particular, resemble the scales coating the aerial hyphae of an rdlAB mutant (Fig. 3B). We assume that this heterogeneous layer consists of assemblies of the different chaplin proteins, some of which may be associated with the rodlin proteins, as the hyphae of a mutant lacking all eight chaplin genes are devoid of any decorative fibers, as are hyphae of several bld mutants (results not shown). Consistent with a loose assembly of fibers on the surface of wild-type hyphae, as aerial development proceeds fibrous material is shed onto the surrounding glass during growth. This sloughing off is most extreme in the mutant expressing only ChpEFG proteins (Fig. 3A). This is not unexpected due to the absence in these fibrils of "long" chaplins (ChpABC) that contain sorting signals that are targets for sortases (7, 11). Sortases cleave between the threonine and glycine residues in a conserved motif and mediate covalent attachment of the C-terminal end of the target protein to the peptidoglycan cross-bridge. The instability of the fibrous layer may help to explain the delay in aerial development that is characteristic of the quintuple chaplin mutant (7, 11).
The most tightly organized fibrous surface layer is evident on the surface of mature spores. This is likely to comprise the mosaic rodlet layer described in the early years of ultrastructure studies of S. coelicolor spores (13, 23) and subsequently investigated more recently at the molecular level (8). In both cases, electron microscopy of vitrified samples has revealed rodlets that measure 60 to 150 nm in length, in good agreement with the lengths of fibers we have observed. Individual rodlets were estimated to have a width of 12 nm, but they are often described as being organized in pairs with members of the pairs separated by a groove 20 nm wide (23). The hydrated fibers coating spores that we observed have a width of between 17 to 22 nm. Pairs of parallel tightly joined fibers are also apparent in the AFM images. We believe that the differences in the width and appearance of the rodlets imaged using the two different techniques are a consequence of the vitrification techniques used for electron microscopy. A further indication that the fibrous mosaic coating wild-type spores we observed is, indeed, the rodlet layer is its absence on the surface of spores of the rdlAB mutant. The rodlin proteins, together with chaplin proteins, are essential for correct formation of this layer (8), and the smooth spore surface of the mutant spores indicates that the fibrous scales of younger aerial hyphae have been shed during maturation.
Extensive disruption of the rodlet layer at the site of spore separation has been observed in electron micrographs (13). AFM reveals much more localized modification of the layer during this stage of development (Fig. 2E and F). The difference in the observed extent of disruption could be a consequence of relatively aggressive sample preparation techniques prior to electron microscopy that remove elements of the layer rendered unstable at the site of cell division due to remodeling of the underlying peptidoglycan. Moreover, whereas the rodlet layer is described as a highly stable insoluble surface layer (7), surrounding layers of nonanchored chaplin fibers are also likely to be removed by the sample preparation techniques preceding electron microscopy of cell surfaces. This may explain why electron microscopy of freeze-etched samples of nonseptated aerial hyphae has previously revealed only the rodlet layer (13, 23). The AFM images suggest that as an aerial hypha grows, less stable surface fibrils are continuously shed, and the rodlet layer is only then revealed as a spore chain matures. Indeed, transmission electron microscopy of thin sections of aerial hyphae suggests a relatively thick fibrous layer (12), likely to be composed of more than a single rodlet layer. We propose that the stable rodlet layer is composed of the rodlin proteins together with the long chaplins A to C that are anchored to the cell wall. The short chaplins, encoded by genes that are expressed in 10- to 25-fold greater amounts than the long chaplins (7), are likely to contribute to the less stable fibrous layer on the surface of growing aerial hyphae. The surface layer of aerial hyphae of S. avermitilis is also relatively unstable, with a lot of very long fibrous material being shed during growth. This species has orthologues encoding the two long chaplins, ChpB and ChpC, and two short chaplins, ChpE and ChpH, but no rodlin genes (14). Electron micrographs of S. avermitilis spores have previously indicated a relatively smooth surface with no evidence of a rodlet layer (8). This contrasts with the network of filaments we observed coating spore chains, again suggesting that this layer is unstable and is lost during sample preparation preceding electron microscopy.
We are grateful to Dennis Claessen, Wouter de Jong, and Lubbert Dijkhuizen for providing the chaplin and rodlin mutants.
Published ahead of print on 28 December 2006. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»