Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, March 2007, p. 2319-2330, Vol. 189, No. 6
0021-9193/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JB.01569-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Department of Environmental Toxicology, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California 95064
Received 10 October 2006/ Accepted 5 January 2007
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Biofilms are surface-attached microbial communities composed of microorganisms and the extrapolymeric substances they produce (15, 49, 51). Biofilm formation begins with the transport and attachment of bacteria to surfaces. After initial attachment, colonization of a surface is mediated by the movement and growth of attached bacteria, followed by the formation of microcolonies, which are often surrounded by extrapolymeric substances. Further growth of bacteria and continued production of exopolysaccharides lead to the development of mature biofilms characterized by pillars and mushroom-like structures. It has been shown that the development of these structures depends on several factors, including biomass growth rate, twitching motility, signaling molecules, and exopolysaccharide production (15, 49, 51). Cells in the mature biofilms can return to the planktonic stage through detachment, thus completing the cycle of biofilm development (49, 63). Detachment of mature biofilms may occur as a result of nutritional and oxygen availability or the presence of other environmental stresses (11, 22, 49, 56, 59). Compared to surface attachment and mature biofilm development, the molecular mechanisms of the detachment process are largely unknown. Nonetheless, polysaccharide lyases have been reported to be involved in biofilm detachment and cell dispersal in several biofilm-forming microorganisms (4, 11, 17, 35, 50).
In V. cholerae, the sequence of events leading to the initial attachment and subsequent formation of mature biofilms on surfaces under laboratory conditions, as well as the genes required for these steps, has been reported (63). The mannose-sensitive hemagglutinin type IV pilus and flagellum facilitate attachment to abiotic surfaces. Under laboratory conditions, the mannose-sensitive hemagglutinin type IV pilus is also required for efficient colonization of biotic surfaces, such as the chitinous exoskeleton of zooplankton (14) and cellulose fibers (62). Chitin-regulated pilus and toxin-coregulated pilus also facilitate attachment to chitinous surfaces (44, 53). Furthermore, Vibrio polysaccharide (VPS), which is part of the extracellular matrix, is required for the development of mature biofilms (63, 71).
V. cholerae can undergo phenotypic variation in response to environmental stresses, resulting in rugose and smooth colonial variants (48, 60, 64, 71). Compared to the smooth variant, the rugose variant forms corrugated colonies and well-developed biofilms and exhibits increased levels of resistance to osmotic and oxidative stresses. Most of these rugose-associated phenotypes are due in part to increased production of VPS (48, 54, 60, 71), which is mediated by proteins encoded by the vps genes (vpsA to -K, VC0917 to -27 [vps-I cluster]; vpsL to -Q, VC0934 to -9 [vps-II cluster]) (Fig. 1). Mutations in any of the vps genes yield a smooth colonial morphology and reduced capacity to form biofilms (71). The vps genes are organized into regions encoding vps-I (11.5 kb) and vps-II (6.6 kb) on the large chromosome, separated by an 8.3-kb intergenic region (Fig. 1). We previously reported that rbmA (VC0928), the first gene located in the vps intergenic region, is required for the full development of corrugated rugose colony morphology as well as pillar and mushroom-like structures of biofilms (20). We hypothesized that the genes located in the vps intergenic region may have a role in rugose colony development and biofilm formation. We generated null mutants of these genes and undertook a complete phenotypic characterization. In this study, we show that genes located downstream of rbmA, termed rbmB, rbmC, rbmD, rbmE, and rbmF (rugosity and biofilm structure modulators B to F; VC0929 to -33) encode proteins that modulate rugose colony development and biofilm formation in V. cholerae. In addition, we also show that bap1 (biofilm-associated protein 1; VC1888) (47) (also called vcp [vps-coregulated protein] [30]), which has peptide sequence similarity to that of rbmC, encodes a protein that is also involved in rugose colony development and biofilm formation in V. cholerae.
|
View larger version (7K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Genetic organization of the vps intergenic region. The genetic organization of rbmABCDEF and bap1 (open arrows) on the V. cholerae chromosome is depicted with locus annotations under each open reading frame. The vps-I and vps-II gene clusters, as well as the first and last genes of each cluster (vpsA and vpsK and vpsL and vpsQ) are marked and labeled. Unlinked chromosomal DNA regions are indicated (||). Illustration is not to scale.
|
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Primers used in this study
|
pir). Biparental matings were carried out with the V. cholerae rugose variant and the conjugative strain E. coli S17-1 (
pir) harboring various deletion plasmids. Ampicillin- and rifampin-resistant transconjugants, resulting from single homologous recombinations, were selected and subjected to sucrose-based selection, similar to that described by Fullner and Mekalanos (21). Ampicillin-sensitive and sucrose-resistant V. cholerae deletion strains, which had undergone double homologous recombinations, were selected. A double deletion mutant of rbmC and bap1 was generated by deleting bap1 in a rugose rbmC null mutant using the same method described above. The deletion mutants were verified by PCR and designated R
rbmB, R
rbmC, R
rbmD, R
rbmEF, R
bap1, and R
rbmC
bap1. Complementation plasmids prbmB, prbmC, prbmD, prbmEF, and pbap1 were constructed by cloning PCR-amplified rugose variant chromosomal fragments of rbmB, rbmC, rbmD, rbmEF, and bap1 (including the upstream and downstream regulatory elements) into the vector pACYC177 (New England Biolabs), using respective forward and reverse complementation primers. Ampicillin-resistant strains were selected after electroporation of various complementation plasmids into respective deletion strains. Complementation strains were verified via PCR.
Generation of Myc-tagged RbmB, RbmC, and Bap1. The coding regions of rbmB, rbmC, and bap1 (including the start codon but excluding the stop codon) were amplified with respective forward and reverse Myc-tagging primers and directionally cloned into the vector pBAD/Myc-His B (Invitrogen), in frame with the upstream start codon as well as downstream Myc epitope and six-histidine codons. The resulting C-terminal Myc-tagged expression plasmids prbmB-myc, prbmC-myc, and pbap1-myc were electroporated into the rugose variant and various deletion mutants. Ampicillin-resistant strains harboring the Myc-tagged expression plasmids were selected and verified via PCR. V. cholerae deletion strains carrying the various Myc-tagged expression plasmids were used in cellular fractionation experiments. The prbmB-myc and pbap1-myc plasmids were also used in overexpression experiments in the presence of 0.1% (wt/vol) arabinose, except for colony morphology determinations of the rugose variant harboring prbmB-myc or the vector, for which the arabinose concentration was 0.01% (wt/vol).
Generation of GFP-tagged strains.
V. cholerae deletion strains and rugose variant were tagged with green fluorescent protein (GFP) according to the procedure previously described (20). Briefly, triparental matings were carried out with donor E. coli S17-1 (
pir) carrying pMCM11, helper E. coli S17-1 (
pir) harboring pUX-BF13, and various V. cholerae strains. Transconjugants were selected on thiosulfate-citrate-bile salts-sucrose (Difco) agar medium containing gentamicin at 30°C. GFP-tagged V. cholerae strains were verified by PCR and used in flow cell and cell aggregation experiments.
ß-Galactosidase assays. ß-Galactosidase assays were carried out in MultiScreen-HA 96-well microtiter plates fitted onto a MultiScreen filtration system (Millipore) using a previously published procedure (20) which is similar to that described by Miller (46). Exponential cultures were harvested when optical densities at 600 nm (OD600) reached 0.3 to 0.5. The assays were repeated with four different biological replicates and at least eight technical replicates.
Quantitative biofilm assays. Biofilm formation assays were carried out in polyvinyl chloride microtiter plates with 100 µl of 200-fold-diluted overnight-grown cultures incubated at 30°C for 8 h, according to the method previously described (69). The assays were repeated with three different biological replicates and at least eight technical replicates.
Cell aggregation experiments, flow cell experiments, and CLSM. Cell aggregation experiments were carried out using hanging drop slides (Fisher Scientific) with 10-fold-diluted overnight-grown cultures of GFP-tagged V. cholerae strains. Flow cell experiments were carried out according to the procedure previously described (42). Briefly, overnight-grown cultures of GFP-tagged V. cholerae strains were diluted to an OD600 of 0.1, and 350-µl aliquots of the diluted cultures were inoculated by injection into the flow cell chambers. Before inoculation, the chambers were sterilized and equilibrated with 0.5% (vol/vol) hypochlorite, followed by sterile MilliQ water and 2% LB (0.2 g/liter tryptone, 0.1 g/liter yeast extract, 9 g/liter NaCl) or 2% LB supplemented with ampicillin at a flow rate of 4.5 ml/h. After inoculation, the chambers were allowed to stand inverted, with no flow, for 1 h. Flow was resumed at a rate of 4.5 ml/h with chambers standing upright. Flow cell experiments were carried out at room temperature. Overexpression of rbmB, for the flow cell studies, was achieved by growing the bacterial strains in 2% LB supplemented with ampicillin for 24 h, followed by changing the growth medium to 2% LB supplemented with ampicillin and 0.1% (wt/vol) arabinose. Overexpression of bap1 was achieved by growing the bacterial strains in 2% LB supplemented with ampicillin and 0.1% arabinose after inoculation. Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) images of the biofilms and cell aggregates were captured with a LSM 5 PASCAL system (Zeiss) at 488-nm excitation and 543-nm emission wavelengths. Three-dimensional images of the biofilms were reconstructed using Imaris software (Bitplane) and quantified using COMSTAT (27). Flow cell and cell aggregate experiments were carried out with at least two different biological replicates.
VPS extractions and analyses. VPS extractions and analyses were carried out according to procedures similar to those previously described (18). Briefly, overnight-grown cultures (100 µl) were spread on petri plates (100 by 15 mm) containing LB agar medium and incubated overnight at 30°C. Bacteria from these plates were harvested by scraping and suspended in 10 ml of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; 20 mM sodium phosphate [pH 7.3], 100 mM NaCl). Optical densities of the samples were determined after vortexing, and the samples were diluted to the same OD with PBS. Equal volumes of the samples were transferred to 25-ml Erlenmeyer flasks and shaken on a rotary shaker at 4°C for 5 h. The VPS suspensions were separated from the cells and debris by repeated centrifugation at 20,000 x g for 30 min, followed by 13,000 x g for 30 min. Crude VPS was precipitated with 3 volumes of ethanol at 4°C overnight, followed by centrifugation at 20,000 x g for 30 min. The pellets were washed with 70% ethanol and suspended in 3 ml of nuclease buffer (40 mM Tris-Cl [pH 8.0], 10 mM MgCl2, 2 mM CaCl2). DNase I (New England Biolabs) and RNase A (QIAGEN) were added to the VPS suspensions at final concentrations of 0.7 units/ml and 5 µg/ml, respectively, followed by incubation at 37°C shaking for 3 h. Proteinase K (Merck) was then added at a final concentration of 70 µg/ml, and the suspensions were further incubated with shaking overnight at 37°C. VPS suspensions were aliquoted into 2-ml centrifuge tubes, and phenol-chloroform extractions (equal volumes) were carried out three times, followed by precipitation with 3 volumes of ethanol, washing with 70% ethanol, and suspension in 250 µl of water. Equal amounts of VPS samples were analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). The upper (5% polyacrylamide) stacking portion of the SDS-PAGE gel was 6.5 cm long, while the lower (12% polyacrylamide) portion of the gel was 2 cm long. The gels were stained with Stains-All (U.S. Biochemical) according to a previously published method (39). VPS analyses were repeated with two different biological replicates.
Cellular fractionations. Overnight-grown cultures of Myc-tagged V. cholerae strains were diluted 200-fold and inoculated into fresh LB medium containing ampicillin. Cells in the exponential growth phase (OD600 of 0.3 to 0.4) were induced with 0.1% (wt/vol) arabinose for 1 h. Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 15,000 x g for 15 min, washed with PBS, and resuspended in 10 mM Tris-Cl (pH 8.0). Cell lysis was carried out with sonication (10 10-s pulses), and cell debris was separated from whole-cell lysate by repeated centrifugation at 15,000 x g for 15 min. Culture supernatants were collected by repeated centrifugation at 15,000 x g for 15 min, followed by deoxycholic acid sodium salt monohydrate-trichloroacetic acid (Na-DOC/TCA) precipitation (10). Briefly, Na-DOC was added to culture supernatants to obtain a final concentration of 0.02% (wt/vol), followed by incubation on ice for 30 min. TCA (Sigma) was then added to obtain a final concentration of 10% (vol/vol), followed by incubation on ice for 2 h. Proteins in the culture supernatants were pelleted by centrifugation at 15,000 x g for 30 min. Pellets were washed with ice-cold acetone and resuspended in 10 mM Tris-Cl (pH 8.0). Protease inhibitors aprotinin, leupeptin, and pepstatin (Roche) were used at 2 µg/ml, 5 µg/ml, and 0.7 µg/ml, respectively. Protein concentrations were estimated using a Coomassie Plus protein assay kit (Pierce) with bovine serum albumin as standard. Protein samples were loaded at 40 µg and 5 µg for immunoblot analyses of Myc-tagged proteins (RbmC-Myc and Bap1-Myc) and OmpU, respectively.
Immunoblot analyses. Immunoblot analyses were carried out according to a procedure previously described (20). Rabbit polyclonal antisera against V. cholerae OmpU (provided by K. Klose) was used at a dilution of 1:100,000, while mouse monoclonal antibody against the Myc epitope (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) was used at a dilution of 1:1,000. Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit and anti-mouse secondary antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) were used at a dilution of 1:2,500. Immunoblots were developed with the SuperSignal West Pico chemiluminescent kit (Pierce). Immunoblot analyses were carried out with at least two different biological replicates. Immunoblot analysis of the outer membrane protein OmpU was carried out as a control on the cellular fractions.
|
|
|---|
-carrageenase CgiA (E-value, 1e-05) (7) and Bacillus circulans
-1,3-glucanase Agl (E-value, 4e-06) (68), both of which are polysaccharide hydrolases. The similarities of peptide sequences of RbmB and CgiA, calculated using the European Molecular Biology Open Source Software Suite (EMBOSS) alignment programs, revealed that RbmB and CgiA exhibit 30.1% similarity over the entire length of the peptide sequences. Similarly, RbmB and Agl exhibit 13.4% similarity over the entire length of the peptide sequences. These findings suggested that rbmB could encode a protein that might function as a polysaccharide hydrolase. To determine the role of rbmB in colony morphology development and biofilm formation, an in-frame deletion mutant of rbmB was generated in the rugose genetic background (R
rbmB). The deletion mutant exhibited an increased colony corrugation compared to the rugose variant (Fig. 2A), and this phenotype was partially complemented (reduced corrugation) by introducing a wild-type copy of rbmB in a multicopy plasmid to the R
rbmB strain (data not shown). Because R
rbmB exhibited altered colony morphology, we hypothesized that biofilm formation by the mutant may also be altered. To test this hypothesis, we compared the structures of biofilms formed by these two strains (Fig. 2B) using flow cell systems and CLSM, and we also analyzed total biofilm formation using the crystal violet staining assay (Fig. 2C). Although we did not observe significant differences in the biofilm-forming capacities of the two strains, biofilm structures formed by the R
rbmB mutant were subtly different from those formed by the rugose variant. COMSTAT analyses of the CLSM images of the biofilm structures formed after 24 h postinoculation revealed that the mutant formed thicker biofilms than those of the rugose variant (Table 3). The mutant also formed biofilms that were more heterogeneous in nature, as R
rbmB biofilms had a higher roughness coefficient compared to the rugose variant. Total biomass and substrate coverage of the biofilms formed by R
rbmB and rugose variant were similar. These results indicate that RbmB affects colony rugosity and subtly affects biofilm structures. We also compared motility, pellicle formation, growth profiles, and cell aggregations of R
rbmB and the rugose variant, but we did not observe significant differences (data not shown).
![]() View larger version (37K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. RbmB modulates rugose colony development and biofilm formation. (A) Colony morphologies of the rugose variant and R rbmB. (B) CLSM images of the top-down views (large panels) and orthogonal views (side panels) of biofilms formed by the rugose variant and R rbmB in a flow cell system after 24 h of incubation. Bars, 40 µm. (C) Quantitative analysis of biofilm formation by the rugose variant and R rbmB after 8 h of growth at 30°C under static conditions. Error bars represent standard deviations. (D) Expression of the vpsA::lacZ and vpsL::lacZ fusion genes in the rugose variant and R rbmB grown at 30°C to the mid-exponential growth phase. Error bars represent standard deviations.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. COMSTAT quantitative analysis of biofilm structures formed by V. cholerae rugose variant and deletion mutants of rbmB-F and bap1a
|
rbmB are due to increased amounts of VPS. To this end, VPS was extracted from R
rbmB and the rugose variant, which were normalized to the same cell density, and the extracted VPS samples were analyzed on a 5% SDS-PAGE gel and stained with Stains-All. VPS accumulation by the deletion mutant was noticeably higher compared to the rugose variant as shown in Fig. 3. To determine if this increase was due to an increase in expression of the vps genes in the deletion mutant, we monitored the expression of vpsA and vpsL using vpsA::lacZ and vpsL::lacZ fusion plasmids (13) in ß-galactosidase assays. As shown in Fig. 2D, there were no significant differences in vpsA and vpsL expression levels between the rugose variant and R
rbmB. Both the rugose variant and R
rbmB harboring the vector showed negligible background ß-galactosidase activities (data not shown). Taken together, the results demonstrate that vps gene expression levels were not altered in R
rbmB and that the more-corrugated colony morphology, subtle altered biofilm structures, and increased VPS accumulation observed in the deletion mutant are due to the loss of RbmB function.
![]() View larger version (62K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. SDS-PAGE analysis of VPS accumulation. Equal volumes (50 µl) of VPS samples were analyzed from the rugose variant, R rbmB, R rbmC, R rbmD, R rbmEF, R bap1, and R rbmC bap1. Cultures were normalized to the same cell density. The gel was stained with Stains-All, and the 5% polyacrylamide stacking portion of the gel is shown.
|
Polysaccharide lyases reported to date are (or have been predicted to be) extracellular or periplasmic (1, 4, 17, 35, 50, 65). The TIGR-CMR database indicated the presence of a putative 31-amino-acid-long signal peptide in RbmB, but SignalP 3.0 (for signal peptide cleavage site prediction) did not have a strong prediction for a cleavage site (probability of cleavage between S31 and E32 is 0.319 by the SignalP-NN method and 0.023 by the SignalP-HMM method). We attempted to determine the localization of RbmB with immunoblot analyses using Myc- and His-tagged RbmB. Due to the presence of several contaminating signals around the predicted sizes of the tagged RbmB (45.7 kDa without the predicted signal peptide; 49.9 kDa with the signal peptide) using both anti-Myc and anti-His antibodies, we were unable to determine its cellular localization. We are currently generating anti-RbmB antibodies to determine the localization of this putative polysaccharide lyase.
Overexpression of rbmB affects colony morphology and biofilm structures.
Since the lack of functional RbmB alters colony corrugation and biofilm structures, we hypothesized that increased production of RbmB may also alter these phenotypes. Indeed, overexpression of rbmB from an arabinose-inducible promoter in both the rugose variant and R
rbmB mutant resulted in decreased colony corrugation, while the strains carrying the vector remained corrugated (Fig. 4A). We also determined that overexpression of RbmB in mature biofilms leads to changes in biofilm structures where the biofilms become less compact and more homogeneous compared to the biofilms formed by the same strain carrying the vector only (Fig. 4B). These findings further suggest that RbmB may be degrading the VPS, which is required for the development of colony corrugation and biofilm formation, by acting as a polysaccharide lyase.
![]() View larger version (37K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Overexpression of rbmB affects colony morphology and biofilm structures. (A) Colony morphologies of the rugose variant and R rbmB harboring the overexpression plasmid prbmB-myc or the vector pBAD/Myc-His B grown in the presence of arabinose. (B) CLSM images of the top-down views (large panels) and orthogonal views (side panels) of biofilms formed by R rbmB harboring prbmB-myc or the vector in a flow cell system after 24 h postinduction. Mature biofilms were allowed to form in the flow cell chambers in the absence of arabinose for 24 h, followed by overexpression of rbmB with the addition of 0.1% (wt/vol) arabinose to the growth medium. Bars, 40 µm.
|
rbmC, R
bap1, and R
rbmC
bap1). Although colony morphology of R
rbmC (Fig. 5) was not noticeably different from that of the rugose variant, R
bap1 and double deletion R
rbmC
bap1 formed colonies that were more flat and less wrinkled than the rugose variant. An increase in smoothness was also obvious when comparing R
bap1 and the double mutant R
rbmC
bap1, indicating that RbmC and Bap1 have an additive effect on development of colony corrugation. R
bap1 and R
rbmC
bap1 carrying the complementation plasmids prbmC and pbap1 exhibited increased corrugation in the center of the colony (partial complementation), suggesting that RbmC and Bap1 may have similar functions. Colony morphologies of strains carrying the control vector pACYC177 were similar to those of the respective deletion mutants. Together, these results show that RbmC and Bap1 modulate the development of corrugated colonies.
![]() View larger version (42K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. RbmC and Bap1 are involved in rugose colony development. Colony morphologies are shown for the rugose variant, R rbmC, R bap1, R bap1 harboring prbmC, R bap1 harboring pbap1, R bap1 harboring the vector pACYC177, R rbmC bap1, R rbmC bap1 harboring prbmC, R rbmC bap1 harboring pbap1, and R rbmC bap1 harboring the vector pACYC177.
|
rbmC (Fig. 6A) was not significantly different from that formed by the rugose variant. On the other hand, R
bap1 formed a pellicle with an altered structure (top panel), while the double deletion mutant R
rbmC
bap1 was incapable of forming pellicles. The defect in the pellicle formation phenotype of the R
rbmC
bap1 mutant could be complemented by introducing the wild-type copy of either rbmC or bap1 on a multicopy plasmid, again suggesting that RbmC and Bap1 may have a similar function. R
rbmC
bap1 harboring the control vector pACYC177 remained impaired in pellicle formation. Although total biofilm formation by the two single deletion mutants (R
rbmC and R
bap1) was not significantly different compared to the rugose variant, the double deletion mutant (R
rbmC
bap1) was unable to form biofilms (Fig. 6B). Using vpsA::lacZ and vpsL::lacZ fusion plasmids, we determined that vps gene expression was not significantly altered in these deletion mutants (Fig. 6C), indicating that the observed defect in biofilm formation was not due to decreased vps transcription.
![]() View larger version (57K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. RbmC and Bap1 are involved in pellicle and biofilm formation. (A) Pellicle formation by the rugose variant, R rbmC, R bap1, R rbmC bap1, R rbmC bap1 harboring prbmC, R rbmC bap1 harboring pbap1, and R rbmC bap1 harboring the vector pACYC177 after 2 days of incubation at 30°C. Top and side views of the culture tubes are showed in the top and bottom panels, respectively. (B) Quantitative comparison of biofilm formation by the rugose variant, R rbmC, R bap1, and R rbmC bap1 after 8 h of growth at 30°C under static conditions. Error bars represent standard deviations. (C) Expression of the vpsA::lacZ and vpsL::lacZ fusion genes in the rugose variant, R rbmC, R bap1, and R rbmC bap1 grown at 30°C to the mid-exponential growth phase. Error bars represent standard deviations.
|
rbmC
bap1 formed a thin layer of biofilm, which detached after 6 h. Only a few microcolonies remained attached to the substratum after 24 h. This is reflected in the COMSTAT analyses, where the total biomass, biofilm thickness, and substrate coverage of the double deletion mutant were dramatically lower at 24 h postinoculation compared to those of the rugose variant. In contrast, R
rbmC and R
bap1 single mutants formed biofilm structures similar to those of the rugose variant at both 6 and 24 h, which were also reflected in the COMSTAT analyses of the images. We also extracted and analyzed VPS from the deletion mutants and the rugose variant but did not observe differences in the amount of VPS accumulated by the different strains (Fig. 3). It should be noted that growth profiles, cell aggregations, and motilities of the deletion mutants and the rugose variant were also similar (data not shown). Together, these results indicate that RbmC and Bap1 are critical for pellicle and biofilm formation and the altered phenotypes are due to the loss of RbmC and Bap1 functions.
![]() View larger version (48K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. RbmC and Bap1 are secreted proteins and are involved in maintaining biofilm architecture. (A) CLSM images of the top-down views (large panels) and orthogonal views (side panels) of biofilms formed by the rugose variant, R rbmC, R bap1, and R rbmC bap1 in a flow cell system after 6 and 24 h of incubation. Bars, 40 µm. (B) Immunoblot analysis of proteins in the CS and WC fractions from arabinose-induced R rbmC (top) and R bap1 (bottom) harboring the overexpression plasmids prbmC-myc and pbap1-myc (lanes 1 and 3) as well as the vector pBAD/Myc-His B (lanes 2 and 4).
|
rbmC
bap1 mutant forms colonies with dramatically decreased colony corrugation and is defective in forming mature biofilms, we hypothesized that increased production of Bap1 may alter colony morphology and biofilm phenotypes. We overexpressed Bap1 from an arabinose-inducible promoter and analyzed morphology of the colonies developed on LB agar medium supplemented with ampicillin and 0.1% arabinose. It should be noted that growth on arabinose reduces colony corrugation of the rugose variant (3), and the R
rbmC
bap1 mutant formed smooth-looking colonies on LB agar medium supplemented with 0.1% arabinose. Increased expression of bap1 in the double deletion mutant resulted in only a slight increase in colony roughness at the edges of the colony compared to the same strain carrying the vector (Fig. 8A). In contrast, the biofilm-forming capacity of the R
rbmC
bap1 mutant harboring the overexpression plasmid pbap1-myc was dramatically increased compared to the R
rbmC
bap1 mutant carrying the vector (Fig. 8B). These results suggest that increased Bap1 expression leads to a modest change in colony morphology and results in the formation of more-structured biofilms.
![]() View larger version (40K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 8. Overexpression of bap1 affects colony morphology and biofilm structure. (A) Colony morphologies of R rbmC bap1 harboring the overexpression plasmid pbap1-myc or the vector pBAD/Myc-His B. Strains were grown in the presence of 0.1% (wt/vol) arabinose. (B) CLSM images of the top-down views (large panels) and orthogonal views (side panels) of biofilms formed by R rbmC bap1 harboring pbap1-myc or the vector in a flow cell system after 24 h of growth in the presence of 0.1% (wt/vol) arabinose. Bars, 40 µm.
|
-chain, which has been reported to be involved in ligand recognition and binding with proteins in the extracellular matrix or surface proteins on other cells (5, 43). The galactose mutarotase-like domains, on the other hand, are described by the Structural Classification of Proteins database as probable carbohydrate-binding domains in enzymes acting on sugars. The ModBase software predicted both RbmC and Bap1 with a protein fold of 1jv2A (E values of 1e-12 and 5e-14, respectively), a human integrin
Vß3 (66). Three putative N-acetylglucosamine-binding sites were also predicted in both RbmC and Bap1 by the ModBase software. Further detailed analysis using the SAM (sequence alignment and modeling) software (36, 37) revealed that D220-A499 and T640-G821 of RbmC are homologous to the ß-propeller FG-GAP domains of the integrin
-chain and that Q500-T644 and G821-Y957 are homologous to sugar-binding lectin domains. These computational predictions are consistent with the possible roles of RbmC and Bap1 in maintaining rugosity of colony morphology and stabilizing pellicle and biofilm structures.
SignalP predicted that both RbmC and Bap1 are secreted proteins. RbmC is predicted to contain a signal peptide with cleavage between A22 and T23 (probabilities of 0.806 and 0.870 for the two SignalP methods), while Bap1 is predicted to contain a signal peptide with cleavage between A26 and S27 (probabilities of 0.780 and 0.930). To determine whether RbmC and Bap1 are secreted, we carried out immunoblot analyses using anti-Myc antibodies on proteins in TCA-precipitated culture supernatant (CS) and whole-cell lysate (WC) fractions from cultures of R
rbmC harboring prbmC-myc and R
bap1 harboring pbap1-myc. Immunoblots of such analyses (Fig. 7B) showed the presence of immunoreactive polypeptides corresponding to the expected sizes for RbmC-Myc (105 kDa) and Bap1-Myc (75.4 kDa) (without the predicted signal peptides) in the CS fractions of the deletion strains harboring their respective overexpression plasmids (lane 1). Such signals were absent in the CS fractions (lane 2) and WC fractions (lane 4) from strains carrying the vector pBAD/Myc-His B. Only weak bands corresponding to the sizes of RbmC-Myc and Bap1-Myc were detected in the WC fractions from strains harboring prbmC-myc or pbap1-myc (lane 3). These results indicate that RbmC and Bap1 are predominantly secreted.
RbmD, RbmE, and RbmF are involved in biofilm structure formation and cell aggregation.
The last three genes in the vps intergenic region are the 1,317-bp rbmD (VC0931), 288-bp rbmE (VC0932), and 405-bp rbmF (VC0933) (Fig. 1). Since RbmA to -C are capable of modulating colony morphology and biofilm formation, we hypothesized that RbmD to -F may also play similar roles. To investigate this hypothesis, we generated in-frame deletions of rbmD and rbmEF in the rugose genetic background (R
rbmD and R
rbmEF). rbmE and rbmF were deleted together, as they shared 88-bp overlapping coding sequences. R
rbmD and R
rbmEF exhibited similar colony morphology as the rugose variant (Fig. 9A). Quantitative biofilm assays (Fig. 9B) and expression analyses of vpsA and vpsL (Fig. 9C) did not reveal significant differences between the deletion mutants and the rugose variant. Furthermore, we also did not observe significant differences in motility, pellicle formation, growth profiles (data not shown), and VPS accumulation when comparing R
rbmD and R
rbmEF to the rugose variant (Fig. 3).
![]() View larger version (50K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 9. Colony morphology and biofilm formation phenotypes of the rbmDEF deletion mutants and the rugose variant are similar. (A) Colony morphology of the rugose variant, R rbmD, and R rbmEF. (B) Quantitative comparison of biofilm formation by the rugose variant, R rbmD, and R rbmEF after 8 h of growth at 30°C under static conditions. Error bars represent standard deviations. (C) Expression of the vpsA::lacZ and vpsL::lacZ fusion genes in the rugose variant, R rbmD, and R rbmEF grown at 30°C to the mid-exponential growth phase. Error bars represent standard deviations.
|
rbmD and R
rbmEF biofilms formed using flow cell systems revealed that their biofilm structures were different from those of the rugose variant (Fig. 10A). The pillars of the biofilms formed by the deletion mutants appear to be less compact than those formed by the rugose variant at both 6 and 24 h. These differences were also reflected in the COMSTAT analyses (Table 3), in which the roughness coefficients of the deletion mutants were lower than for the rugose variant, indicating more homogeneous biofilm structures. On the other hand, total biomass, biofilm thickness, and substrate coverage were similar between the mutants and the rugose variant.
![]() View larger version (60K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 10. RbmD, RbmE, and RbmF are involved in biofilm structure formation and cell aggregation. (A) CLSM images of the top-down views (large panels) and orthogonal views (side panels) of biofilms formed by the rugose variant, R rbmD, and R rbmEF in a flow cell system after 6 and 24 h of incubation. (B) CLSM images of the top-down views of cell aggregates from overnight-grown cultures of the rugose variant, R rbmD, and R rbmEF. Bars, 40 µm.
|
rbmD and R
rbmEF mutants to that of the rugose variant. R
rbmD formed cell aggregates that were larger and less compact, while R
rbmEF formed string-like aggregates that were smaller in size compared to the cell aggregates formed by the rugose variant (Fig. 10B). Complementation of the altered cell aggregation phenotype was achieved with R
rbmD and R
rbmEF harboring prbmD and prbmEF, respectively (data not shown). Together, these results indicate that RbmD and RbmEF are involved in cell aggregation and biofilm structure formation and that the altered phenotypes are due to the loss of RbmD and RbmEF functions. The TMHMM 2.0 program (for trans-membrane helices predictions) predicted 12 trans-membrane helices in RbmD, suggesting that RbmD is located on the membrane. RbmD is also predicted to contain a 30-amino-acid signal peptide (probabilities of cleavage between A30 and W31 are 0.390 and 0.666 for the two SignalP methods). Although RbmD is annotated as a conserved hypothetical protein in the TIGR-CMR database, Quick BlastP searches and EMBOSS alignment programs revealed that RbmD has peptide sequence similarity to O-antigen polymerases from Pseudoalteromonas atlantica (53.7% similarity) and Shewanella frigidimarina (54.1% similarity), with E-values of 5e-76 and 2e-70, respectively. The InterPro database (for integrated resource of protein families, domains, and functional sites) also indicated the presence of a Wzy_C domain in RbmD, which is found in O-antigen polymerases involved in the synthesis of the outer membrane lipopolysaccharide O-antigen (8). It is therefore possible that RbmD is involved in the biosynthesis of VPS in V. cholerae, consistent with the observations that RbmD is involved in wild-type biofilm structure formation and cell aggregation. In contrast, computational analyses of RbmE and RbmF, which are predicted to be organized in an operon, did not reveal significant domain structures. They are annotated as hypothetical proteins in the TIGR-CMR database, and Quick BlastP searches also did not retrieve protein matches with significant E-values. While RbmE does not contain a signal peptide and is not predicted to be secreted, SignalP predicted RbmF to contain a 22-amino-acid signal peptide (probabilities of cleavage between A22 and E23 are 0.890 and 0.999 for the two SignalP methods). The localization and involvement of RbmD to -F in VPS biosynthesis in V. cholerae remain to be investigated.
|
|
|---|
In this study, we showed that rbmB, which may encode a polysaccharide lyase, is critical for development of rugose colony morphology and biofilm formation (Fig. 2 to 4). Consistent with its predicted role as a polysaccharide lyase, computational analyses revealed that RbmB contains six PbH1 domains with a right-handed parallel ß-helix protein fold, commonly found in enzymes with polysaccharide substrates, including several bacterial pectate and pectin lyases (25, 32, 33), fungal and bacterial polygalacturonases and rhamnogalacturonases (32, 33), and
-carrageenase from Alteromonas fortis (45). The presence of putative N-acetylglucosamine- and mannose-binding sites in RbmB further reinforces the notion that RbmB may function as a polysaccharide lyase in V. cholerae, breaking down the VPS that is composed of glucose, galactose, N-acetylglucosamine, and mannose (71). The exact ligand-binding sites, substrate specificity, and enzymatic properties of RbmB as well as its role in biofilm detachment in V. cholerae remain to be investigated.
Although there are a number of studies reporting the role(s) of polysaccharide lyases in biofilm formation and detachment processes, the underlying molecular mechanisms remain largely unknown. In Pseudomonas aeruginosa, alginate lyase has been reported to degrade alginate into shorter-length polymers, leading to cell sloughing and detachment of bacteria from mature biofilms (11, 24). The gene encoding the P. aeruginosa periplasmic alginate lyase, algL, is located within the alginate biosynthesis cluster (12, 57). Interestingly, alginate production and alginate lyase expression have been reported to be coregulated by the positive transcriptional regulator AlgB (57), and alginate lyase also plays a role in alginate biosynthesis in P. aeruginosa (1). A recent report also suggested the possible bifunctional roles of AlgL in a multiprotein secretion complex and in degrading free alginate polymers in the periplasm (31). Genes encoding alginate lyases in other Pseudomonas and Azotobacter species have also been reported to be located within their respective alginate biosynthesis gene clusters (65). It is therefore not surprising that the putative polysaccharide lyase-encoding gene, rbmB, is located within the two vps clusters in V. cholerae and its transcription is regulated by the vps positive regulator, VpsR (70). Several alginate lyases from a number of marine Vibrio species have also been studied, including V. halioticoli (58), V. harveyi AL-128 (40), V. alginolyticus ATCC 17749 (40), Vibrio sp. strain YWA (61), Vibrio sp. strain QY101 (23), and Vibrio sp. strain O2 (38). However, the biological roles of these alginate lyases in these Vibrio species remain to be investigated. Polysaccharide lyases in other microorganisms have also been reported to play a role in biofilm detachment and cell dispersal, including an endo-ß-1,4-mannanase in Xanthomonas campestris (17), a ß-N-acetylglucosaminidase in Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans (35), and an endo-polysaccharide hydrolase in Methanosarcina mazei (67).
RbmC and its homolog, Bap1 (30, 47), were previously annotated in the TIGR-CMR database as hemolysin-related proteins, and they also share peptide similarity to the hemolysin protein HlyA from V. cholerae. RbmC exhibits 28.2% sequence similarity to HlyA, while the sequence similarity between Bap1 and HlyA was found to be 20.7%. The facts that transcription of rbmC and bap1 are positively regulated by the positive regulator VpsR (70) and that rbmC and bap1 are coregulated together with the vps clusters (47, 70) led us to hypothesize that RbmC and Bap1 may have a role in colony morphology and biofilm formation rather than function as hemolysin proteins. Indeed, a single deletion of bap1 and double deletions of rbmC and bap1 resulted in strains with less-corrugated colony morphologies (Fig. 5) and altered pellicle formation (Fig. 6). The double deletion mutant was also impaired in forming mature biofilm structures (Fig. 7A). We also showed that RbmC and Bap1 are secreted proteins (Fig. 7B), consistent with their roles in maintaining rugosity of colony morphology and stabilizing pellicle and biofilm structures. RbmC and Bap1 are also predicted to contain FG-GAP and carbohydrate-binding domains as well as putative N-acetylglucosamine-binding sites. These computational predictions are consistent with the roles of RbmC and Bap1 in maintaining rugosity of colony morphology as well as stabilizing pellicle and biofilm structures (Fig. 5 to 8), possibly through binding to carbohydrates in the extracellular matrix of V. cholerae, suggesting that RbmC and Bap1 may act as lectins.
Ali et al. (2) reported that a transposon insertion into VC0930 in the chromosome of a V. cholerae O1 El Tor C6706 rugose variant converts rugose colony morphology to smooth. However, an in-frame deletion of rbmC generated in the O1 El Tor A1552 rugose variant in this study did not exhibit altered colony morphology compared to the rugose variant (Fig. 5), a finding likely to be due to the differences in the genetic make-up of these two strains. A study by Hung et al. (30) reported that a bap1 deletion mutant in V. cholerae classical strain O395 was defective in biofilm production. The bap1 deletion mutant generated in the V. cholerae O1 El Tor A1552 rugose variant in this study formed biofilms similar to those of the rugose variant (Fig. 7A). The differences could be attributed to the different biotypes used in the studies.
Deletion mutants of the last three genes in the vps intergenic region, rbmDEF, did not exhibit significant differences in colony morphology and total biofilm formation relative to the rugose variant (Fig. 9). However, the mutants were impaired in wild-type biofilm structure formation and cell aggregation (Fig. 10), suggesting that the proteins play a role in cell-cell or cell-matrix adhesion. Computational analyses predicted that the putative membrane-bound RbmD contains a Wzy_C domain found in O-antigen polymerase (8), suggesting a possible role of RbmD in VPS biosynthesis in V. cholerae. This possibility needs to be further investigated.
Biofilm formation is widely believed to be employed by many aquatic microorganisms, including V. cholerae, as a survival strategy in natural environments, and many studies have been carried out to understand the structural and regulatory components of this developmental process (15, 49, 51, 63, 71). However, the molecular bases of many areas in biofilm formation and detachment processes remain elusive. In V. cholerae, the rugose variant biofilm developmental cycle begins with the attachment of single planktonic or aggregated cells to surfaces, followed by the formation of microcolonies and mature biofilms (Fig. 11). It has been shown that the formation of mature biofilm structures requires the production of VPS (71) and that the secreted matrix protein RbmA is also involved in maintaining the biofilm architecture (20). Here, we report that other secreted matrix proteins, RbmC and Bap1, are also involved in stabilizing the biofilm matrix. Furthermore, we also identified a putative polysaccharide lyase, RbmB, that may play a role in degrading VPS in the extracellular matrix, leading to the dissemination of V. cholerae in natural aquatic environments.
![]() View larger version (11K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 11. Model of the biofilm developmental cycle in V. cholerae. Biofilm formation in the rugose variant begins with attachment of single or aggregated cells to surfaces. This is followed by the formation of microcolonies and mature biofilm structures, which require the presence of VPS as well as matrix proteins RbmA, RbmC, and Bap1, which are predicted to act as lectins. The biofilm developmental cycle is completed with detachment of bacteria from mature biofilms, which is likely to be mediated in part by RbmB, predicted to act as a VPS lyase.
|
We acknowledge Kevin Karplus for carrying out the bioinformatic analyses. We thank Karen Ottemann, Chad Saltikov, and members of the Yildiz laboratory for their suggestions.
Published ahead of print on 12 January 2007. ![]()
|
|
|---|
5ß1 that retains ligand recognition. J. Biol. Chem. 275:5888-5903.
-Carrageenases constitute a novel family of glycoside hydrolases, unrelated to that of
-carrageenases. J. Biol. Chem. 275:35499-35505.
-carrageenan, a main cell wall polysaccharide of red algae. J. Mol. Biol. 334:421-433.[CrossRef][Medline]
Vß3. Science 294:339-345.
-1,3-glucanase gene from Bacillus circulans KA-304: the enzyme participates in protoplast formation of Schizophyllum commune. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 70:1754-1763.[CrossRef][Medline]This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»