Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, January 2008, p. 421-427, Vol. 190, No. 1
0021-9193/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JB.01093-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.


Department of Biological Sciences, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio 43403
Received 11 July 2007/ Accepted 15 October 2007
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The model system for the transfer of energy to the OM is the TonB system. In Escherichia coli and most other gram-negative species that have been examined, TonB couples the ion electrochemical gradient of the CM to drive the active transport of ferric siderophores, cobalamin, and potentially other ligands across the OM (for reviews, see references 44, 45, and 54). A second system, centered on the TolA protein, plays a major role in maintaining envelope integrity (37, 38), at least in part by supporting OM invagination during cell division (11), and it shares many characteristics with the TonB system. While a role in energy transduction has not been established as firmly for TolA as for TonB, the conformations of both proteins are responsive to changes in the CM electrochemical potential (5, 13, 35), and the proteins have membrane topologies consistent with such a role (17, 41, 46), with amino-terminal CM anchors, elongated central domains that are a suitable length to span the periplasmic space (9, 40), and carboxy-terminal domains that interact with OM components (4, 53). For these and additional reasons presented below, it is likely that both proteins function as energy transducers; however, the OM recipients of TonB- and TolA-transduced energy are sufficiently different that neither transducer is able to substitute for the other (3).
TonB and TolA interact with heteromultimeric protein complexes whose members share sequence homology with the MotA/MotB proton translocator complex of the bacterial flagellum (6, 29). Each energy transducer has a preferred energy-harvesting complex. For TonB, the complex consists of the proteins ExbB and ExbD, and for TolA, the complex consists of the proteins TolQ and TolR. The exact stoichiometry and arrangement of protein subunits in these energy-harvesting complexes remain unknown. For the ExbB/ExbD complex, protein stoichiometry (20) and in vivo chemical cross-linking studies (22) together have suggested that there is a large complex containing as many as four or five molecules of ExbD and 14 or 15 molecules of ExbB (18). Conversely, it has been suggested that the TolQ/TolR complex might consist of a pair of TolR molecules surrounded by four TolQ molecules, mimicking a structure proposed for flagellar motor components (6). While the details of the complex composition remain unresolved, the relationship between the complexes is evident, both in the conservation of primarily amino acid sequences among components (8, 49) and in membrane topology. ExbD and its paralogue TolR are both secured in the CM by a single amino-terminal signal anchor (24, 43), while ExbB and its paralogue TolQ are both anchored in the CM by three transmembrane domains and have a periplasmically exposed amino terminus, a relatively large cytoplasmic domain, a short periplasmic loop, and a cytoplasmically exposed carboxy terminus (25, 26, 52).
The cumulative evidence indicates that the ExbB/ExbD and TolQ/TolR energy-harvesting complexes couple the energy transducers TonB and TolA to the ion electrochemical potential of the CM. For both TonB and TolA, the presence of the preferred energy-harvesting complex is required for membrane energy-dependent conformational changes (13, 35) and, in the case of TolA, also for energy-dependent association with an OM protein (5). The interactions that drive these changes appear to be mediated through the amino-terminal signal anchors of the energy transducers, which share a conserved amino acid motif (28) containing several residues important for the function (12, 32, 34, 50). Mutations that disrupt this conserved face in TonB can be suppressed by second-site mutations that map to the energy-harvesting complex component ExbB (35, 36); similarly, the corresponding mutations in TolA can be suppressed by second-site mutations in TolQ (12).
While the energy transducers show a preference for their cognate energy-harvesting complexes, the preference is not absolute. This was first shown by the observation that mutations in exb genes resulted in a leaky tonB phenotype (8, 15), with the residual activity dependent upon the presence of a functional tolQ (and presumably tolR) gene (2). This molecular cross talk between energy-harvesting complexes is bidirectional, with the TolQ/TolR and ExbB/ExbD complexes each able to imperfectly replace the other (3).
This cross talk phenomenon suggests that these systems share a common mechanism of energy transfer. Interestingly, in the study mentioned above (3) TonB activities lower than the activities achieved by TolQ/TolR-mediated cross talk were evident in a strain carrying only the exbB and tolR genes. It is thus likely that ExbB and TolR can be assembled into an energy-harvesting complex; however, the low level of activity obtained suggests that the energy-harvesting complex that they form either is very inefficient, is formed only rarely, or is not stable. Activity was not detected in a strain carrying only the tolQ and exbD genes, indicating either that TolQ and ExbD do not assemble into complexes or that such complexes are not functional at levels detectable by the assays used. Regardless of the explanation, the lack of efficient energy transduction in strains encoding only one component of each energy-harvesting complex suggests that paired components of each energy-harvesting complexes have coevolved to the degree that the protein interactions within a complex are more stringent than those between the complex and the energy transducers. Consistent with this interpretation, Braun and Herrmann also found that overexpressed TonB, which is unstable unless ExbB is also overexpressed (10), could be stabilized by overexpression of TolQ, even though TolQ alone or in a potential complex with ExbD could not energize TonB (3).
The inefficiency of cross talk and the lack of interchangeability of energy-harvesting complex components suggest approaches for dissection and identification of the essential structural features that provide energy transduction. Specifically, we began to modify Tol system components by substituting the corresponding Exb regions, with the idea that this should identify motifs that are important for intracomplex interactions, as well as motifs that mediate transducer preference. Our initial approach was to assemble tol derivatives on plasmids and express their chimeric products from arabinose-regulated promoters at levels approximating those of their chromosomally encoded counterparts. As a baseline, we first revisited the question of potential mixed energy-harvesting complexes (3), pairing plasmids expressing individual energy-harvesting complex components under arabinose regulation in a strain carrying a large deletion encompassing the exb operon and an amber mutation in tolQ that is polar on tolR (KP1456) (Table 1). The data generated in these pilot experiments were difficult to interpret. First, we were unable to consistently express proteins at wild-type levels, and we found that overexpression of tol genes limited the ability of cells to form confluent lawns in colicin and phage susceptibility assays (data not shown). Second, the tolQ mutation used was clearly not completely polar on tolR (data not shown), a complicating factor also evident in the previous study (3). Finally, it was unclear whether the other genes affected by the exb deletion made phenotypic contributions.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. E. coli strains and plasmids
|
red recombination technique (7), which were then paired in various combinations in a W3110 background by generalized transduction using P1vir (42), as summarized in Table 1. As described below, by evaluating individual components expressed from the chromosome, this strategy confirmed previous observations regarding the ability of plasmid-encoded products to support TonB-dependent energy transduction and yielded information concerning protein stability and interactions under more physiologically relevant conditions. Together, the observations provide insight into the role of individual components in TonB-dependent energy transduction not evident from plasmid-based studies. Deletions of the exbB and exbD genes were verified by immunoblot analysis (as described below) of cell lysates, using ExbB-specific and ExbD-specific polyclonal antibodies (22). These analyses demonstrated not only that the specific gene product (ExbB or ExbD) was absent from the corresponding deletion strain but also that the deletions did not have polar effects (i.e., deletion of one member of the gene pair did not alter the expression of the other member) (data not shown). These observations were confirmed by colicin susceptibility assays (performed as described previously [31]) to determine loss of function, followed by complementation experiments in which individual deletion strains were transformed with either the ExbB-expressing plasmid pKP392 (18) or the ExbD-encoding plasmid pKP393 (constructed here by insertion of a PCR-amplified exbD gene from W3110 into pBAD24 [16] under control of the arabinose promoter). In each case, complementation with the appropriate plasmid restored wild-type levels of TonB activity as measured by susceptibility to colicins (data not shown).
Because specific antibodies were not available for proteins of the Tol system, an alternative approach was used to verify the deletions. First, the absence of the each gene or gene set was confirmed by PCR, using genomic DNA isolated from each strain and primers that flank the tolQRA gene cluster. The identities of resultant amplimers (and the deletions evident in the amplimers) were confirmed by restriction mapping (data not shown). The absence of Tol proteins was confirmed by colicin susceptibility assays to determine loss of function, followed by complementation experiments in which individual deletion strains were transformed with plasmids (constructed as described above for pKP393) carrying either tolQ (pRA001), tolR (pRA002), or tolQR (pRA003). While introduction of the tolQR-bearing plasmid restored TolA activity (as measured by susceptibility to colicins) with all tol gene deletions tested, complementation studies with individual genes indicated that deletion of tolQ was highly polar on tolR (data not shown). Thus, for strains in which we desired the absence of TolQ but the presence of TolR, it was necessary to provide TolR in trans from plasmid pRA002.
The TonB and TolA activities of strains expressing various combinations of energy-harvesting complex proteins were examined by spot titer assays (Table 2). Strain W3110, which contained functional copies of all four energy-harvesting complex genes, was used as the wild type and was sensitive to both the TolA-dependent agent colicin A (ColA) and the TonB-dependent agents colicin B (ColB) and bacteriophage
80. Multiple-deletion strain RA1051, which lacked all four genes, served as the negative control and was fully resistant to each agent at the dilutions tested. When only TolQ and TolR were present (RA1003), the sensitivities to the TonB-dependent agents were reduced compared to the sensitivities of wild-type strain W3110 (2 or 3 fivefold dilutions less for ColB and 1 or 2 10-fold dilutions less for
80, with the residual activity representing the cross talk contributions of TolQ and TolR). The susceptibility to the TolA-dependent agent ColA was similar to that of the wild-type strain. Because our tolQ deletion was polar on tolR, strain RA1034 (which expressed only TolQ) was complemented with the TolR-encoding plasmid pRA002 and compared with RA1003 to verify that functional TolR protein was made from the plasmid under these assay conditions. This pair was slightly more efficient at supporting cross talk and slightly less efficient at supporting the cognate TolA-dependent activity than RA1003, in which both TolQ and TolR were encoded in the chromosome. Thus, plasmid-derived TolR was certainly functional, but under the assay conditions used it was expressed at levels sufficiently different from the level of chromosomally encoded TolR to result in small differences in overall colicin susceptibility. When only ExbB and ExbD were present (RA1035), the sensitivities to TonB-dependent agents were similar to those of the wild-type strain, whereas the susceptibility to the TolA-dependent agent ColA was greatly decreased, with the residual activity representing the cross talk contribution of ExbB and ExbD. When only ExbB and TolR were present [RA1045(pRA002)], TonB activity was evident only with the
80 spot titer assay, an assay that can detect levels of TonB lower than the levels that can be detected by the colicin spot titer assay (31). Conversely, no activity was detected by any assay when only TolQ and ExbD were present (RA1044) or when any of the energy-harvesting complex proteins were expressed alone [RA1045, RA1046, RA1034, and RA1051(pRA002)].
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Susceptibility to group A and B colicins and phage 80
|
tolQR strain (RA1035) levels, while strains lacking either TolQ and ExbD [RA1045(pRA002)] or ExbB and TolR (RA1044) were indistinguishable from the strain lacking all four proteins (RA1051). The degree of cross talk activity detected in this assay was lower than the level detected by colicin susceptibility assays (Table 2). This was consistent with the ability of colicin assays to register levels of TonB lower than the levels that could be detected by transport assays (31). As expected, the steady-state levels of TonB varied between strains (Fig. 1); however, the differences in either the pattern or the intensity were not great enough to account for the differences in [55Fe]ferrichrome uptake observed (Table 3). |
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. TonB-dependent ferrichrome transport
|
![]() View larger version (27K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Steady-state levels of TonB protein in strains used for [55Fe]ferrichrome uptake. Aliquots (0.5 ml) of cells grown to mid-exponential phase (as described in Table 3, footnote a) were harvested just prior to the addition of [55Fe]ferrichrome, precipitated in 10% trichloroacetic acid at 4°C for 15 min, centrifuged, washed in 100 mM Tris-Cl (pH 8.0), suspended in 25 µl of Laemmli sample buffer, incubated at 98°C for 5 min, resolved on a sodium dodecyl sulfate-11% polyacrylamide gel (30), transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride membrane, and probed using the TonB-specific monoclonal antibody 4F1 (33), with subsequent visualization by enhanced chemiluminescence as previously described (48). Following immunoblot analysis, membranes were stained for total protein with Coomassie blue and visually examined to confirm equivalent sample loading of all lanes. In this experiment, the wild-type (ExbB+ ExbD+ TolQ+ TolR+) sample was two- to threefold underloaded relative to the other samples. Strains are identified by their relevant phenotypes at the top, and the positions of molecular mass standards are indicated on the right. B, ExbB; D, ExbD; Q, TolQ; R, TolR.
|
![]() View larger version (54K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. In vivo chemical cross-linking. Cells were grown in T-broth supplemented with 100 µg ml–1 ampicillin to mid-exponential phase, harvested in 1.0-ml aliquots, centrifuged, and suspended in 938 µl of 100 mM phosphate buffer (pH 6.8). Then 62 µl of 16% paraformaldehyde was added, and suspensions were incubated at room temperature for 15 min, centrifuged, and suspended in 25 µl of Laemmli sample buffer. Samples were incubated at 60°C for 5 min and then resolved on a sodium dodecyl sulfate-11% polyacrylamide gel, and a subsequent immunoblot analysis was performed as described in the legend to Fig. 1. Strains are identified by their relevant phenotypes at the top; the positions of molecular mass standards are indicated on the right, and the relative positions of monomeric TonB and the specific TonB-containing complexes are indicated on the left. B, ExbB; D, ExbD; Q, TolQ; R, TolR.
|
![]() View larger version (26K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Stability of TonB under steady-state conditions. All strains were grown to mid-exponential phase in LB broth supplemented with 100 µg ml–1 ampicillin. Chloramphenicol was then added to a final concentration of 100 µg ml–1 to halt protein synthesis. Samples were taken at 0, 15, 30, 60, and 120 min and precipitated in 10% (wt/vol) trichloroacetic acid. Samples were washed in 100 mM Tris-Cl (pH 8.0) and then suspended in 25 µl of Laemmli sample buffer, incubated at 98°C for 5 min, and resolved on sodium dodecyl sulfate-11% polyacrylamide gels, and a subsequent immunoblot analysis was performed as described in the legend to Fig. 1. Strains are identified by their relevant phenotypes on the left, sample times (in minutes) are indicated at the top, and the positions of molecular mass standards are indicated on the right. B, ExbB; D, ExbD; Q, TolQ; R, TolR.
|
An alternative explanation is suggested by studies with second-site ExbB suppressors of TonB transmembrane domain mutants (35). In the absence of the suppressor, these TonB mutants are inactive and relatively stable; in the presence of the suppressor, they are active and very unstable, but only if a transportable ligand is present. Thus, instability in this case appears to involve a state that TonB normally achieves only following transfer of energy to an OM transporter.
The present results appear to bridge these two potential explanations. In the absence of either energy-harvesting complex, TonB was inactive and unstable. The presence of either ExbB or TolQ was sufficient to confer stability, but without supporting TonB activity. Similarly, strains encoding one component of each energy-harvesting complex (ExbB and TolR or TolQ and ExbD) proved to be unable to efficiently support TonB activity, but this did confer stability to TonB. Conversely, the TolQ/TolR energy-harvesting complex could support TonB activity but could not confer stability to TonB. Only in the presence of both ExbB and ExbD was TonB both active and stable. Together, these observations support the contention that the stabilization of TonB by energy-harvesting complex components is indirect, involving distinct TonB conformations.
The cumulative body of in vivo and in vitro data addressing TonB structure has led us to propose that the TonB carboxy-terminal domain can exist in either ordered or disordered conformations and that transitions between these conformations is regulated by the ExbB/ExbD complex (32, 45). Because it shares membrane topology with TonB, it has been speculated that ExbD might function as a chaperone to manage the disorder-order transitions of TonB that occur during the energy transduction cycle (51). The present data suggest that ExbD specifically mediates the transitions that return TonB to a stable conformation following energy transduction. Further, they raise the possibility that the greatly diminished levels of function evident when ExbB and TolR are paired might be due to incompatibilities between the periplasmic of domains TolR and TonB rather than between TolR and ExbB themselves.
An award to R.L. from the National Science Foundation (grant MCB0315983) supported this research.
Published ahead of print on 26 October 2007. ![]()
Present address: Department of Microbiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104. ![]()
|
|
|---|
V17) by a missense mutation in ExbB. Mol. Microbiol. 13:627-640.[CrossRef][Medline]
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»