Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, June 2008, p. 4233-4241, Vol. 190, No. 12
0021-9193/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JB.00205-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853,1 College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 276062
Received 9 February 2008/ Accepted 9 April 2008
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The genetic regulation of SPI1 is complex. Much of the response to environmental conditions requires HilA, an SPI1 transcriptional regulator of the OmpR/ToxR family (6, 7). Among the targets of HilA is the SPI1 gene invF, which itself encodes a transcriptional regulator (35). HilA and InvF have overlapping, but not identical, sets of targets, both within and outside SPI1 (1, 14, 17). HilA, in turn, is subject to multiple controls, with two additional SPI1 regulators, HilC and HilD, inducing hilA expression (18, 32, 58). In addition to control by transcriptional regulators within SPI1, invasion genes are also under the control of several regulators outside the island (20, 31, 45, 51, 59, 64). Among these is the two-component regulator BarA/SirA. BarA is a sensor kinase of the phosphorelay type, and SirA is its cognate response regulator, with both being required for invasion gene expression and bacterial penetration of epithelial cells (1, 3, 32, 61). SirA induces invasion through the induction of hilA and hilC and by its control of csrB and csrC (22, 61). The latter two encode untranslated RNAs that oppose the action of the posttranscriptional regulator CsrA, also known to affect invasion (2). Thus, SirA regulates SPI1 genes both directly, through the induction of hilA and hilC, and indirectly, by its control of the csr regulatory system.
The regulation of invasion genes also requires a coordinated response to the varied environmental signals present in the gastrointestinal tract. Environmental conditions control the induction of SPI1 genes through HilA (7) and include pH, oxygen tension, osmolarity, growth phase, and bile (7, 25, 42, 43, 46, 55, 56). In addition, short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) appear to play an important role in regulating invasion genes. We have previously shown that acetate can induce invasion in a barA mutant but requires sirA to do so. This effect also requires ackA-pta, which encodes acetate kinase and phosphate acetyltransferase and mediates the interconversion of acetate to acetyl-phosphate and acetyl-coenzyme A (CoA) (see Fig. 5A), suggesting that at least one of these products is required for the BarA-independent induction of SirA (41). The mammalian gastrointestinal tract contains high levels of SCFAs, including formate, acetate, propionate, and butyrate, as the result of the breakdown of food by digestive processes and the action of resident intestinal bacteria. SCFA types and concentrations vary through the gastrointestinal tract. The levels in the small intestine, the site of Salmonella invasion, are between 20 and 40 mM total SCFA, while the levels in the colon range above 100 mM, depending on the animal species and diet (4, 5, 9, 12, 47). Also varying in the gastrointestinal tract are the proportion and the distribution of these SCFAs. Studies of pigs have shown that acetate and formate predominate in the distal small intestine but that propionate and butyrate are in higher concentrations in the cecum and colon (4, 40). It has been demonstrated that while acetate induces invasion genes, propionate and butyrate can repress them (16, 26, 41), suggesting that these SCFAs provide environmental cues that allow Salmonella to recognize specific regions of the intestinal tract.
![]() View larger version (11K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Effects of formate metabolism on sipC expression. (A) Pathways for the integration of formate into central carbon metabolism. (B) Strains with the genotype shown and with the sipC::lacZY fusion were grown as standing overnight cultures in LB with 100 mM MOPS, pH 6.7. Triplicate cultures of each strain were assayed for sipC::lacZY expression by using β-galactosidase assays. Double asterisks show a significant difference for the mutant strain compared to the wild type. Error bars show standard deviations.
|
|
|
|---|
Red recombinase that provides for allelic exchange. Candidate mutants were tested for the loss of the appropriate region by PCR amplification. The marked disruptions were then moved into ATCC 14028s carrying the sipC::lacZY fusion by P22 transduction. To create unmarked mutants when strains with multiple mutations were required, resistance markers were excised by using FLP recombinase (15). The csrB::lacZ fusion was similarly created by first deleting csrB and then integrating lacZ at the site of the disruption, as described previously (19). |
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Strains used in this study
|
β-Galactosidase assays. For β-galactosidase assays used to assess the effects of formate, bacteria were grown as standing overnight cultures in LB with the addition of 100 mM MOPS, pH 6.7. Sodium formate was added at a concentration of 10 mM, while control cultures received 10 mM NaCl. To assess the effects of pyruvate, sodium pyruvate or NaCl was added at 50 mM. Triplicate cultures of each bacterial strain were used unless otherwise noted. For assays to assess the role of pH, strains were grown standing overnight in LB with either 100 mM HEPES, pH 8.0, or 100 mM MOPS, pH 6.7. All cultures were assayed for β-galactosidase activity as described previously (48). Each experiment was repeated independently at least twice. Data from a single experiment that is representative of the independent replicates are shown.
Invasion assays. Bacteria were grown overnight as standing cultures in LB broth buffered with 100 mM MOPS, pH 6.7, and with either 10 mM sodium chloride or 10 mM sodium formate. Bacteria were added to HEp-2 cells grown to confluence in 24-well plates for a multiplicity of infection of approximately 10 bacteria/cell. The plates were incubated for 1 h at 37°C, the medium was removed, the cells were washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline, and the medium was replaced by medium supplemented with gentamicin (20 µg/ml). The cells were incubated for an additional hour, the medium was removed, and monolayers were washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline. The cells were lysed with 1% Triton X-100 for 5 min, and the bacterial titers of the lysates were determined by colony counts. Each strain was tested in quadruplicate for each condition. The assays were performed twice, and the data are the representative results from a single experiment.
Determination of formate concentrations. The formate concentrations in the media were measured by using a formic acid enzymatic bioanalysis detection kit, following the manufacturer's directions (R-Biopharm). This method measured formate concentration by the enzymatic conversion of formate and NAD+ to bicarbonate and NADH through the action of formate dehydrogenase. The NADH concentration was then measured by the UV light absorbance at a wavelength of 340 nm.
Animal experiments.
Three 7-week-old female C57BL/6 mice were used to determine the pH and the formate concentrations in the intestinal tract. To measure pH, the ileum of the mouse was transected at the junction of the cecum immediately after euthanasia, and an Orion micro combination pH electrode (Thermo Electron Corp., Beverly, MA) was inserted retrograde
2 mm into the distal ileum. To determine formate concentrations, cecal and ileal samples were acidified by using a 1% solution of H2SO4, flash frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at –80°C. Before analysis, the samples were thawed and the mass of each sample was recorded. The samples were analyzed by high-pressure liquid chromatography as previously described (60), using crotonic acid as the internal standard. Volatile fatty acids (VFA) were separated by using a Supelcogel H (carbohydrate) column (250 by 4.6 mm with 9-µm particles; Supelco, Bellefonte, PA) with a guard column (Supelcogel H; Supelco). Twenty microliters of sample was injected, and a flow rate of 0.17 ml/min was used to adjust for the narrower bore of the Supelcogel H column. All samples were run for 70 min at 39°C using a mobile phase of 0.015 N sulfuric acid and 0.25 mM EDTA. A Beckman System Gold (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA) was used with the UV detector set at 210 nm, and the results were analyzed by using a VFA standard and 32 Karat software (Beckman Coulter).
Reverse transcription-real-time PCR. The ackA-pta mutant strain was grown for 3 h in LB-100 mM MOPS, pH 6.7, with gentle agitation (60 rpm) to an optical density at 600 nm of 0.5 to 0.55 with either sodium formate or sodium chloride added at a concentration of 10 mM. Two independent cultures were used for each condition. Total RNA was isolated as described at http://derisilab.ucsf.edu/data/microarray/pdfs/Total_RNA_from_Ecoli.pdf with modifications to use 1/10th of all volumes. First-strand cDNA synthesis was performed with 1 µg of RNA using SuperScript III reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) and 300 ng of random primers. The real-time PCR was performed with B-R Sybr green supermix (Quanta Biosciences) and a MyiQ thermocycler (Bio-Rad), with cycling once at 95°C followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 10 s and 58°C for 30 s. Each sample was tested in triplicate. The primers used were ATAGCAAACTCCCGACGATG and ATTAAGGCGACAGAGCTGG for hilA; GGTAGTTAACGTGACGCTTG and GATCTTCTGCGCTTTCTCTG for hilD; ATCAGGCTGGTCGATTTACG and GTACGCCGCTACTCAGGAAC for sipC; and GCAAAGTAGTTGTTCCGGTG and CTTTAAGCATGGCTGGAGTG for icdA. The amounts of PCR product present for each invasion gene were normalized to that of icdA, which was previously determined not to be affected by formate (data not shown).
Statistical analysis.
For β-galactosidase and invasion assays, a one-way analysis of variance was used to determine whether the mean of at least one strain differed from that of any of the others. Then, multiple-comparison tests were used to determine which means differed at a P value of
0.05 (The SAS system for Windows 8 and MINITAB release 14).
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (31K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Effects of conditioned medium on sipC expression. The wild type and barA and ackA-pta mutants with a sipC::lacZY fusion were grown standing overnight in 50% 2x MOPS minimal medium with 1% glucose and 50% of either fresh or conditioned medium. Fresh medium (gray bars) consisted of 1x MOPS minimal medium with 0.5% glucose and amino acids. Conditioned medium was made by growing the wild type (striped bars), sirA mutant (white bars), or ackA-pta mutant (black bars) standing overnight in this same medium and then filter sterilizing the culture supernatant. Expression of sipC was assessed by using β-galactosidase assays. Values represent the mean for each condition tested in triplicate. Asterisks show a significant difference (P 0.05) for the strain with the genotype shown when grown with the addition of conditioned medium compared to the fresh-medium control. Error bars show standard deviations.
|
We next tested the effects of formate on invasion gene expression. For these and all subsequent experiments, we used pH-buffered LB as the growth medium, as it maintained stable culture pH after overnight growth. We found that the addition of 10 mM sodium formate to an ackA-pta mutant restored sipC expression to a level greater than that of the wild-type strain (Fig. 2A). This same concentration of sodium formate, however, had no significant effect in strains that carried null mutations of either barA or sirA. Similar results were obtained upon the addition of formic acid (data not shown), and the addition of either sodium formate or formic acid did not alter the pH of the medium before or after the growth of the culture. To determine the concentration of formate required to induce invasion genes, we grew the ackA-pta mutant in media containing increasing amounts of sodium formate (Fig. 2B). All of the concentrations tested, 1 mM or higher, significantly induced sipC expression, to the level of the wild type or higher.
![]() View larger version (18K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Effects of formate on sipC expression. (A) Strains were grown as standing overnight cultures in LB with 100 mM MOPS, pH 6.7, and with 10 mM sodium chloride (gray bars) or 10 mM sodium formate (black bars). Triplicate cultures of each strain were assayed for sipC::lacZY expression by using β-galactosidase assays. (B) Overnight standing cultures of the wild type (gray bars) and ackA-pta mutant (black bars) with the sipC::lacZY fusion were grown in LB with 100 mM MOPS, pH 6.7, and with 0, 1, 5, 10, 20, or 30 mM sodium formate. Triplicate cultures for each condition were assayed for sipC::lacZY expression. Single asterisks show a significant difference (P 0.05) for the strain with the genotype shown when grown with the addition of formate compared to the NaCl control. Double asterisks show a significant difference for the mutant strain compared to the wild type when both were grown without formate. Error bars show standard deviations.
|
![]() View larger version (20K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Invasion of epithelial cells. Bacteria were grown overnight as standing cultures in LB broth buffered with 100 mM MOPS, pH 6.7, and with either 10 mM sodium chloride (gray bars) or 10 mM sodium formate (black bars). Bacteria were added to HEp-2 cells, and the level of invasion was assessed by using a gentamicin protection assay. Invasion is shown in comparison to that of the wild-type strain set to 100. Each strain and condition was tested in quadruplicate. Single asterisks show a significant difference (P 0.05) for the strain with the genotype shown when grown with the addition of formate compared to the NaCl control. Double asterisks show a significant difference for the mutant strain compared to the wild type when both were grown without formate. Error bars show standard deviations.
|
![]() View larger version (21K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Effects of medium pH on sipC expression in response to formate. The wild type and ackA-pta mutants with a sipC::lacZY fusion were grown standing overnight in LB with 100 mM HEPES, pH 8.0, or 100 mM MOPS, pH 6.7, as indicated, and with either 10 mM sodium chloride (gray bars) or 10 mM sodium formate (black bars). Expression of sipC was assessed by using β-galactosidase assays. Values represent the mean for each condition tested in duplicate. Single asterisks show a significant difference (P 0.05) for the strain with the genotype shown when grown with the addition of formate compared to the NaCl control. Double asterisks show a significant difference for the mutant strain compared to the wild type when both were grown without formate. Error bars show standard deviations.
|
Effects of formate metabolism on signaling. Salmonella produces formate as a by-product of anaerobic growth. Formate can then be used to maintain the redox balance during anaerobic respiration by acting as an electron donor for nitrite, as well as a number of other substrates of anaerobic respiration, and can donate electrons to the quinone pool (Fig. 5A). These major routes of formate utilization alternatively employ the formate dehydrogenase O (FdhO) system, encoded by fdoGHI, or the FdhN system, encoded by fdnGHI. To determine whether products of formate oxidation, rather than the molecule itself, were signals for the activation of invasion, we examined mutants with mutations of these known formate degradation pathways for the effects of the mutations on invasion gene expression. We found that the loss of either pathway, through the mutation of either fdoG or fdnG, did not change the expression of sipC (Fig. 5B). The loss of both mechanisms for the production of reduced metabolic intermediates, using an fdoG fdnG double mutant, also failed to alter sipC expression. Alternatively, Salmonella can excrete formate, but under the low-pH conditions induced by fermentation, formate can reenter the bacterium, and there it can be used to stabilize the internal pH by its conversion to CO2 and H2. This reaction requires a membrane-bound formate-hydrogen lyase complex, an essential component of which is formate dehydrogenase H (FdhH), encoded by fdhF. We tested an fdhF null mutant and found it to have a small increase (approximately 63%) in the expression of sipC (Fig. 5B). Thus, as FdhH is required for the production of molecular hydrogen from formate, H2 produced by this pathway cannot be the signal for invasion. It is possible, however, that the small increase in invasion gene expression observed was due to an increase in formate concentration within the bacterium, making it available to other metabolic pathways. It has also been reported that in E. coli, the FdhH system, which normally produces H2 from formate, can play a significant role in the reduction of nitrite by formate (13). We therefore eliminated all of the known routes by which formate can reduce metabolic intermediates by constructing and testing an fdoG fdnG fdhF triple mutant and found that it did not differ from the wild type in the expression of sipC (Fig. 5B). These results thus show that the metabolic products of the known pathways of formate oxidation are not required to induce invasion.
In Salmonella, the major source of formate production is from pyruvate by the action of pyruvate formate-lyase, encoded by pflB, the products of which are formate and acetyl-CoA (Fig. 5A). To determine directly whether endogenous formate production was required for Salmonella invasion gene expression, we tested a pflB null mutant. We first determined the amount of formate produced by this mutant. Unlike the findings for growth in minimal medium with glucose as the carbon source, strains grown in pH-buffered LB did not excrete measurable quantities of formate into the culture medium, presumably due to the lack of glucose as a primary source of formate production. The addition of 10 mM formate to the wild-type strain, however, resulted in 6.8 ± 1.4 mM formate in the medium after overnight growth, while the pflB mutant had no detectable formate remaining in the medium, suggesting that exogenous formate was more completely metabolized due to a reduction of endogenous production. Surprisingly, however, when we tested for the effects of pflB on invasion, we found that in the pflB mutant, the expression of sipC was not reduced but instead was significantly increased, by 2.9-fold (Fig. 6A). A pflB mutant should accumulate pyruvate, as it is unable to efficiently convert pyruvate to formate. It is therefore possible that pyruvate itself is able to stimulate invasion gene expression. To test this directly, we added 50 mM sodium pyruvate to the growth medium and assessed the changes in sipC expression (Fig. 6B). Indeed, we found that the addition of pyruvate increased expression 2.4-fold in the wild-type strain. The pflB mutant had intrinsically higher expression in the absence of exogenous pyruvate, comparable to that of the wild type grown in the presence of pyruvate, and did not show increased expression with the addition of pyruvate. To determine whether pyruvate induced invasion gene expression by a mechanism that was independent of formate, we also tested the effects of the addition of formate to the pflB mutant (Fig. 6A). We found that sipC expression was not significantly increased by formate in this mutant. These findings thus show that an increased level of pyruvate can induce invasion and suggest that this effect may be related to that of formate, as evidenced by the lack of effect of exogenous pyruvate on the pflB mutant. We additionally tested one other known route of pyruvate metabolism. In Salmonella, there also exists a homologue of E. coli tdcE, which shares strong homology with pflB in that organism and has been shown to possess formate pyruvate-lyase activity (30). We found that the mutation of tdcE alone had no effect on sipC expression, both with and without the addition of formate to the culture medium, and that a pflB tdcE double mutant had a phenotype identical to that of the pflB mutant alone (data not shown), indicating that tdcE has no significant role in these effects.
![]() View larger version (14K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Effects of pflB on invasion gene expression in response to formate and pyruvate. Strains were grown as standing overnight cultures in LB with 100 mM MOPS, pH 6.7, and with 10 mM sodium chloride (gray bars) or 10 mM sodium formate (black bars) (A) or 50 mM sodium chloride (gray bars) or 50 mM sodium pyruvate (black bars) (B). Triplicate cultures of each strain were assayed for sipC::lacZY expression by using β-galactosidase assays. Single asterisks show a significant difference (P 0.05) for the strain with the genotype shown when grown with the addition of formate (A) or pyruvate (B) compared to the NaCl control. Double asterisks show a significant difference for the mutant strain compared to the wild type when both were grown without additions to the medium. Error bars show standard deviations.
|
![]() View larger version (10K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Effects of formate on SPI1 gene expression. The ackA-pta mutant strain was grown in LB broth buffered with 100 mM MOPS, pH 6.7, and with either 10 mM sodium chloride (gray bars) or 10 mM sodium formate (black bars). Total RNA was used to create cDNA and quantified by real-time PCR. Values were normalized by using the housekeeping gene icdA, and levels found in the control cultures were set to 1. Data are shown as the mean expression of two independent cultures with each culture tested in triplicate. Asterisks show a significant difference (P 0.05) for expression of the gene shown when bacteria were grown with the addition of formate compared to that of the NaCl control. Error bars show standard deviations.
|
|
|
|---|
One finding presented in this work, that formate has its effects only at below-neutral pH, indicates that formate functions as a cytoplasmic signal. When the pH of the surrounding medium is lower than that of the bacterial cytoplasm, exogenous formic acid, a weak acid, can concentrate within bacteria. At equilibrium, the concentration of formate in the cytoplasm is dependent upon the difference between cytoplasmic and external pH and on the external concentration of formate. An external pH of 6.7 with 10 mM formate, as tested here, should allow a cytoplasmic concentration of formate approximately 20-fold greater than that produced at pH 8. The results of our work have shown that this lower pH is necessary for the activity of formate and thus reflect a requirement for high concentrations of cytoplasmic formate.
Formate plays important roles in both anaerobic respiration and fermentation, and thus, much is known about its metabolism. Although it can be degraded to produce both hydrogen and reduced metabolic intermediates, neither of these products appears to be required for the capacity of formate to signal the induction of invasion, as mutations of all known pathways of formate oxidation failed to reduce invasion gene expression. The regulation of formate metabolism may be complex and interconnected, but one possible model for the action of formate is that it shifts the metabolism of pyruvate toward oxidative decarboxylation by pyruvate dehydrogenase and away from that by pyruvate formate-lyase. We have shown that invasion gene expression is elevated in a mutant that cannot make formate due to the loss of pyruvate formate-lyase (Pfl). As this enzyme converts pyruvate to acetyl-CoA and formate, it is likely that this induction of invasion is due to an increase in pyruvate concentration in the mutant strain. It has been shown that in vitro, Pfl is a bidirectional enzyme (36, 37). If Pfl were to function similarly in vivo, it would produce pyruvate when supplied with a high concentration of formate. In support of this, the addition of pyruvate itself caused induction in the wild-type strain, but the addition of formate to the pflB mutant did not. Alternatively, it is possible that formate itself acts as a signal by an unrecognized mechanism or that it is metabolized by a pathway not yet identified. Efforts are ongoing in our laboratory to identify the mechanism by which formate exerts its effects on invasion gene expression.
Although we detected formate in the ileum of mice, its genesis at that site is largely unknown. Presumably, it is produced by the resident microbiota of the small intestine. Recently, there have been great advances in characterizing the microbiota of the large intestine of humans and animals (27, 44, 63). The microbiota of the ileum, however, has not been well described. There is evidence as well that the generation of formate depends upon the complex ecology of the intestinal tract. It has been shown that in the large intestine, the archaeon Methanobrevibacter smithii induces formate production by the bacterium Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron and then uses that formate as a nutrient source (57). Studies have also shown that alteration of the diet of pigs can affect the ileal concentration of formate (40). These findings, along with the fact that very low concentrations of formate are present in the adjacent cecum, suggest that the ileum possesses a microbial ecology that is uniquely suited to the production of this fatty acid.
The induction of Salmonella invasion by formate is but one of several means by which this bacterium senses the environment of the intestine and responds by altering its virulence characteristics. As Salmonella passes through the intestinal tract during the course of infection, it encounters changing environments. In the proximal small intestine, for example, bile is secreted into the intestinal lumen. Bile has been shown to repress invasion, working at or above the level of BarA/SirA (56), and thus prevents invasion at a site at which it would be unproductive. As the bacteria reach the ileum, the most-distal portion of the small intestine, they encounter increased concentrations of formate and the SCFA acetate (4, 5, 12, 39, 40). Both of these constituents induce invasion, with acetate functioning through a mechanism that requires SirA, but not BarA (41). The results of our work suggest that these two environmental cues provide redundant signaling mechanisms, either of which is sufficient to cause disease (41). Yet to be discovered, however, is the signal for BarA, as none of the environmental conditions known have been shown to activate invasion through this sensor kinase. As Salmonella leaves the small intestine and enters the large intestine, it encounters higher concentrations of two other SCFAs, propionate and butyrate, produced by the anaerobic microbiota (4, 5, 12, 47). Both of these repress invasion, acting by an uncharacterized mechanism, again preventing the unproductive expression of invasion determinants (26, 41). Thus, Salmonella uses products of both its animal host and the intestinal microbiota to sense specific regions of the intestine and to promote its virulence.
This project was supported by the National Research Initiative of the USDA Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service, award number 2005-35201-16270, and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, under contract no. N01-AI-30054.
Published ahead of print on 18 April 2008. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»