Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, June 2008, p. 4321-4327, Vol. 190, No. 12
0021-9193/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JB.00097-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Institute for Microbiology, Technische Universität München, Am Hochanger 4, D-85350 Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany,1 Institute of Molecular Genetics, Russian Academy of Science, Kurchatov Sq., 123182 Moscow, Russia2
Received 18 January 2008/ Accepted 30 March 2008
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
18 nm and a mass in excess of 2 x 106 Da (14, 15, 31). About 30 dockerin-containing, cellulosome-related genes have been cloned by screening genomic libraries from C. thermocellum for enzymatically active colonies (5, 28, 29). In addition the scaffoldin protein CipA was identified. It contains nine type I cohesin modules to which enzymes and other protein components specifically dock by virtue of type I dockerin modules (6, 22). Type II cohesin-dockerin interactions anchor the CipA protein to cell wall-bound proteins, such as OlpB or SdbA (4, 16). The nonenzymatic component CspP is presumably involved in structure formation of the huge complex (35). However, not much is known about the structure of the complex and how it is assembled. When the whole genomic sequence of C. thermocellum ATCC 27405 became accessible (GenBank accession no. CP000568), 72 cellulosomal genes, including cipA, were identified in the genome. The dockerin modules were used as an indicator of a cellulosomal gene (36). These dockerin-bearing hydrolytic enzymes appear to be responsible for the efficient degradation of cellulose, xylan, pectin, chitin, mannan, and other plant polysaccharides. They also contain a serine protease and its inhibitors (30), as well as a number of components with still unknown functions (for a list, see reference 36). It is unclear which of these components are required for cellulose breakdown and what role the complex formation could play. Proteomic analysis of isolated cellulosomes helped to identify the most prevalent cellulosomal components (11, 35). Nevertheless, in vitro assembly of the cellulosome and its individual components would be necessary to identify their roles in cellulolysis and fiber degradation. However, previous attempts to take apart the individual components in their native state and to reconstitute them into a functional complex have failed. Morag et al. (23) reported that soluble carboxymethyl-cellulose and amorphous cellulose were degraded by disintegrated cellulosomes, although hydrolysis of crystalline cellulose was severely diminished. Only the reconstitution of small complexes composed of a miniscaffoldin combined with two or three recombinantly produced enzyme components has been possible so far, showing a distinct synergistic effect on crystalline cellulose (8, 9).
The isolation and analysis of mutants impaired in the degradation of crystalline cellulose was considered to shed light on the function of complex formation. A mutant of C. thermocellum that did not adsorb to cellulose, called AD2, was isolated but only partially characterized in respect to its molecular mechanism (1). Its cellulose-degrading ability and cellulosome formation were impaired to some degree, but depending on the substrate, a smaller amount of CipA antigenic material and multimolecular complexes were still formed. However, they were not found to be cell associated (2). The growth of mutant AD2 on cellulose as a substrate was delayed, and although cellulose adsorption was not observed initially, it was observed after some time. The authors later interpreted this as a regulatory phenomenon (3).
Two mutants defective in cellulose degradation have been isolated from the mesophilic cellulosome-forming bacterium Clostridium cellulolyticum (18, 19). The two mutant strains did not degrade crystalline cellulose. They were found to be defective in the entire scaffoldin, as well as several enzymes. Cellulose-adsorbed proteins contained a truncated CipC (scaffoldin) and lacked the major cellulosomal enzyme Cel48F and other proteins encoded by downstream genes in the "cip-cel" cluster. The genetic organization of the cip-cel cluster was characterized for both strains. It showed one or two insertion (IS) elements in the seventh cohesin module-encoding sequence of CipC, which led to a strong polar effect on downstream gene transcription (19, 20).
The results with both types of C. thermocellum and C. cellulolyticum mutants do not directly shed light on the function of a complexed compared to a noncomplexed enzyme system, although the C. thermocellum mutant AD2 marked the beginning of the unraveling of the cellulosome paradigm. The synergistic action between selected pairs of cellulases on crystalline cellulose was revealed either by mixing the soluble components or by binding them in a polypeptide chain or through a binding scaffold (8, 24, 25, 34).
To investigate the cellulosome mechanism more closely, mutants of C. thermocellum defective in adsorption to and degradation of crystalline cellulose were screened. Isolation of the mutants and their molecular and biochemical analysis are described here. As expected, these mutants were found to be defective in scaffoldin production. Surprisingly, all six mutations were caused by transposition of the same IS element. One mutant had the insertion within the first cohesin module-encoding sequence and was thus completely defective in the production of scaffoldin. The analysis of the mutant phenotypes showed that the hydrolytic cellulosomal components were produced but not assembled. The hydrolysis of soluble β-glucans was not affected, whereas the degradation of crystalline cellulose was seriously disturbed.
|
|
|---|
Mutagenesis and mutant screening. A single colony was inoculated at 60°C in GS-2 medium and incubated for 24 h with Whatman no. 1 filter paper as a carbon source. The culture was centrifuged at room temperature in an anaerobic hood (Coy Laboratory Products Inc., Grass Lake, MI), resuspended in the same volume of prewarmed GS-2 medium (without carbohydrate), and kept at 60°C for 2 h. Several 1-ml-samples were mixed with ethyl-methanesulfonate (EMS) (final concentration, 3 to 192 mM) and incubated at 60°C for another 2 h. The cells were washed three times with GS-2 medium by centrifugation, resuspended in 5 ml GS-2 medium supplemented with 1% (wt/vol) cellobiose, and diluted 1:100 in GS-2 medium (with cellobiose). The culture density was determined photometrically after 22 and 43 h (optical density at 600 nm). Growth was detected only at 3 to 25 mM of EMS. The same result was obtained by plating the mutagenized culture for colonies on CM3 medium supplemented with 1% (wt/vol) cellobiose. All manipulations of Clostridium cultures were done under anaerobic conditions.
For enrichment of cells with diminished adsorption of cellulose particles, a method similar to that described for the selection of a spontaneous nonadsorbing mutant was used (1). Cells growing in the logarithmic growth phase in liquid GS-2 medium at 60°C with 1% (wt/vol) cellobiose were gently shaken for 30 min with 10% (wt/vol) MN300 cellulose fibers to enable adsorption of the cells. After sedimentation of the cellulose with adherent cells, 2 ml of the supernatant was carefully removed with a syringe and injected into 4 ml of prewarmed fresh cellobiose GS-2 medium. The flask was incubated for 8 h with occasional shaking. This procedure was repeated nine times. The nonadsorbed cultures were diluted, plated on CM3 plates supplemented with 0.1% cellobiose, and overlaid with 5 ml of CM3 agar containing 0.5% (wt/vol) MN300. Colonies that formed a reduced clear halo or no halo around the colony in the turbid cellulose layer were streaked three times for single colonies. C. thermocellum strain identity was proven by sequencing a PCR amplicon of the 16S rRNA gene.
Recombinant DNA techniques. Preparation of chromosomal and plasmid DNA, endonuclease digestion, and ligation were carried out by standard procedures or according to supplier protocols. Plasmid DNA was prepared with the Qiaprep Spin Miniprep Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Restriction digests of DNA were done as recommended by the manufacturer (MBI Fermentas, St.Leon-Rot, Germany). Escherichia coli cells were transformed with plasmid DNA using electroporation.
Vector pCR2.1-TOPO and the E. coli host strain TOP10 (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany) were used for cloning. PCR for amplification of the cipA gene fragments and the promoter region was carried out using the synthetic oligonucleotide primers Cip1f (5'-AAA ACT TTG CCG GAA AGT TGC), Cip2r (5'-ATA CTG ATG ACT TTT CTC ATC TAC), Cip3f (5'-AAT GGT AGA TGA GAA AAG TCA TC), Cip4r (5'-ATC ATC TGA CGG CGG TAT TG), Cip5f (5'-AAT ACC GCC GTC AGA TGA TC), Cip6r (5'-TTT CAA GGT AGG TGT CTG CG), Cip7f (5'-ATT TGA AGG TTG AAT TCT ACA ACA GC), Cip8r (5'-TTA AGT GTC AAC TTG TTC GGA G), Cip9f (5'-AAC AAG TTG ACA CTT AAG ATA GG), and Cip10r (5'-TAA TCA CTT GAT GTA GCT CCA A) with chromosomal DNA from C. thermocellum DSM1237 as a template and the KOD XL DNA polymerase (Novagen, Darmstadt, Germany). For PCR, the following conditions were used: 25 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 5 s at 55°C, and 1 to 6 min at 72°C. The reaction was completed for 10 min at 74°C.
The 16S rRNA gene was amplified using the oligonucleotide primers 616V (5'-AGA GTT TGA T[CT][AC] TGG CTC) and 630R (5'-CA[GT] AAA GGA GGT GAT CC).
Plasmids were sequenced from double-stranded DNAs of selected colonies.
Preparation of supernatant proteins. Cultures were grown in GS-2 medium containing 1% cellobiose and centrifuged (1,000 x g; 20 min). Cleared supernatants were subjected to ultrafiltration with spin columns of 10,000-Da exclusion size (Vivaspin 500; Vivascience AG, Aubagne, France) to remove salts and small molecules from the medium. The proteins were washed with 100 mM MES (morpholineethanesulfonic acid) buffer, pH 6.0, with 10 mM CaCl2 and concentrated five times. The protein concentration was determined with Coomassie brilliant blue G-250 (Bradford reagent; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Munich, Germany).
Culture supernatant proteins were separated in their native state by size exclusion chromatography using XK16/100 columns with Superose 6 prep grade (GE Healthcare, Germany). The protein concentration was detected photometrically at 280 nm. The protein composition was analyzed by denaturing sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and staining with Coomassie brilliant blue G-250.
Enzymatic assays. Enzyme samples were incubated in MES buffer (50 mM) at pH 6.8 and 60°C. Reducing sugars were quantified at least in triplicate in the linear range of the reaction by the 3.5-dinitrosalicylic acid method (33), assuming that 1 unit of enzyme liberates 1 µmol of glucose equivalent per minute. The following soluble and insoluble substrates were used at 0.5% and 0.67% (wt/vol), respectively: barley β-glucan (Megazyme International, Bry, Ireland), oat spelt xylan, low-viscosity carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) (Sigma-Aldrich, Deisenhofen, Germany), cellulose powder MN300 (Serva, Heidelberg, Germany), microcrystalline cellulose Avicel (Serva; no. 14201), and bacterial cellulose (Cellulon Microfibrous Cellulose; CP Kelco, Atlanta, GA). Phosphoric acid-swollen cellulose was prepared from Avicel CF1 (Sigma-Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany) in accordance with the method of Wood and Bhat (33). All enzymatic estimations were performed at least in triplicate.
Affinity blotting of truncated CipA. Proteins in SDS-PAGE slabs were renatured by incubation in 25% isopropanol, 50 mM Na-citrate for 20 min and washing with 50 mM Na-citrate for 20 min (27). After a buffer change to transfer buffer (50 mM Tris, 40 mM glycine, 1 mM SDS, and 20% methanol), the proteins were electroblotted to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane at 1 mA/cm2 for 2 h. The membrane was blocked overnight with 200 g/liter skim milk powder in phosphate-buffered saline buffer and washed with a washing buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.7, 0.05% Tween 20, 0.5% bovine serum albumin, 2 mM CaCl2) for 20 min.
To detect cohesin-containing proteins on the blot, the recombinant marker protein rCel9N (C. thermocellum Cel9N cellulase containing a dockerin and a His tag) was purified from 400 ml of cell extract of E. coli (pQE-hCel9N) (35) with a 5-ml Ni-nitrilotriacetic acid superflow column (Qiagen) in accordance with the supplier's protocol. Fifty micrograms of rCel9N per ml per cm2 of membrane surface was applied for 2 h. After the washing buffer was changed three times, the attached rCel9N protein was detected with peroxidase-conjugated anti-His antibodies (Qiagen; 1:1,000 in phosphate-buffered saline buffer). The rCel9N/antibody complex was detected with 4-nitroblue tetrazolium chloride and bromo-chloro-indolylphosphate (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations.
Nucleotide sequence accession number. The nucleotide sequences of mutated cipA genes containing the IS sequences were deposited under GenBank accession no. AM491039 (SM1), AM491040 (SM4), AM491041 (SM5), and AM491042 (SM6).
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (107K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Single colonies of a mutagenized culture of C. thermocellum enriched for nonadsorbing cells. Colonies on the turbid cellulose background produce a dark halo when degrading cellulose. The bar indicates a length of 1 cm. Colonies with different sizes and abilities in cellulose hydrolysis can be recognized. Two colonies with reduced cellulose-degrading ability (putative mutants) are indicated by arrows.
|
Mutant phenotype. Four of the six C. thermocellum mutants, SM1, SM4, SM5, and SM6, were genetically different (Table 1). Concentrated cell culture supernatants were subjected to enzymatic tests on barley β-glucan and CMC for control and on microcrystalline cellulose MN300. The enzymatic activities on barley β-glucan and CMC were about 8.5 and 1.0 U mg protein–1, respectively, in all supernatants (Table 2). In contrast, the specific activity on crystalline cellulose was reduced in the mutants SM6, SM5, SM4, and SM1 (in decreasing order of activity), exhibiting as much as 15-fold reduction compared to the wild type.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Positions of the IS1447 insertion in the cipA gene in six SM mutants
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Enzymatic activities of concentrated culture supernatants of the mutant strains and the wild type on barley β-glucan, CMC, and MN300 crystalline cellulose
|
![]() View larger version (95K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. SDS-PAGE of culture supernatant proteins from the mutants. Purified cellulosomes from the wild type (WT) were used. The position of CipA protein is indicated by an arrow. The left lane shows molecular mass markers (kDa).
|
![]() View larger version (11K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Gel filtration (size exclusion chromatography) of culture supernatant proteins from the wild type (WT) and mutants. The amounts of protein (solid lines) and endoglucanase activity on barley β-glucan (dotted lines) are shown. The molecular masses of marker proteins (in kDa) are indicated above.
|
![]() View larger version (47K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Denaturing gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) of concentrated culture supernatants: CipA fragments containing cohesins. Fifteen micrograms of protein was applied to the gel: SM1, 5.02 µl; SM4, 10.7 µl; SM5, 8.1 µl; SM6, 19.2 µl; and wild type (WT), 11.35 µl. Proteins containing cohesin modules were detected with His tag-Cel9N and anti-His antibodies. The numbers indicate molecular masses (kDa) of the protein mass standard (lane M).
|
![]() View larger version (5K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Structure of the cipA gene and positions of IS1447 insertions (mutant designations are indicated). 1, cohesin module 1; CBM, carbohydrate binding module; d, dockerin module.
|
|
View larger version (3K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Sequences of the inverted-repeat structures IRR and IRL of IS1447. Repeated bases are marked by arrowheads. The position of the nonspecific 3-bp repeat created on transposition is indicated by N1N2N3.
|
IS1447 copies present in the genomic sequence of C. thermocellum ATCC 27405. Eighteen copies of IS1447 were identified in the genome sequence of C. thermocellum ATCC 27405. Earlier versions of the draft genome sequence showed that IS1447 created severe problems with the connecting process of small contigs. Although they were corrected in later versions, incorrect contig connections could have been partially avoided with knowledge of the IS element sequence.
|
|
|---|
The reduction of complex size or the loss of entire complexes indicates an inability of the mutants to form normal cellulosomes. Genetic analysis showed that this was solely the result of size reduction or destruction of the scaffoldin. The proteins thus appear in mutant SM1 as dispersed, noncomplexed proteins. The SDS-PAGE pattern (Fig. 2) showed that these proteins appear to be cellulosome components, although minor components could not be recognized with confidence. Only the CipA band was certainly missing completely.
The insertion of a transposable element as the cause of all mutations in the cipA gene was not expected. It is not clear if the transposition events were accidental transpositions selected by the tight screening procedure or if they were induced by a stress reaction caused by the chemical mutagenesis. The appearance of six mutants out of 105 screened colonies appears to be far too frequent for a spontaneous event in a single gene, even if the more than 50 generations of bacterial growth during the screening procedure are taken into account. Due to the negative effect of dam methylation, spontaneous transposition generally occurs after DNA replication (26). Transposition events can be induced frequently, e.g., by stress reactions, which increase recA expression levels during SOS response. IS10 transposition, which was shown to be induced by UV irradiation, is an example of this (7). Chemical mutagenesis could have a similar effect but was probably not necessary in the experiments described here.
Transposition activity of an IS element (IS1447) in C. thermocellum has been shown here for the first time. IS elements are known to increase the plasticity of genomes by creating genome rearrangements, insertions, deletions, or inversions and switching genes on and off (13, 21). A putative transposase gene belonging to a partial IS element differing from IS1447 was identified upstream of the licA gene in C. thermocellum. It was discussed as a possible cause for the "module shuffling" expected for cellulosomal genes and has been proposed to be the source of their modular composition. Multiple copies of this putative IS element were identified in the genome (10). However, no obvious connection between the locations of the cellulosomal genes and those of the IS1447 elements was found (data not shown).
IS1447 is a member of the IS3 family, which is the most prevalent transposon family in bacteria. It matches the average size of IS3 elements (around 1,300 bp). On insertion, it creates a 3-bp target repeat, as do many of its kind (Table 1). The 3-bp doubling of the target in all four mutants allowed the prediction that this is the usual insertion mechanism. This mechanism is in accordance with that described for other IS3 family insertions. With the newly occurring transposition events, this insertion mechanism was obvious.
In all different mutants, the transposase gene of the IS1447 copy was found in the strand opposite to cipA. It is not clear if insertion in the same direction as cipA would allow readthrough and thus expression of functional cipA cohesin modules with a nearly wild-type phenotype of the scaffoldin. In that case, such mutants would not have been picked up by the applied enrichment procedure.
The insertion of the IS1447 copies within the first modules of the cipA gene appeared to have abolished expression of the residual gene completely. Cellulosome complexes were absent in culture supernatants of mutant SM1. Nevertheless, small complexes with increasing size were detected in the mutants SM4, SM5, and SM6, and some active cohesin modules could be produced (Fig. 3). Smaller complexes were observed to have lower activity on microcrystalline cellulose, with increasing activity detected for larger complexes. This is in agreement with the cellulosome paradigm (4) and with the finding that a ternary complex showed synergism on crystalline cellulose (8). However, the 15-fold difference in activity on crystalline cellulose found for the mutant SM1 cellulolytic enzymes compared to the wild-type cellulosomes is extraordinarily high and far beyond the synergistic effect found with so-called minicellulosomes (ternary complexes of two selected cellulases with a miniscaffoldin). This suggests involvement of more components, which should be present in a complex with optimal activity on crystalline cellulose.
The cellulosome paradigm attributes the high efficiency of the complex on crystalline cellulose to the high local concentration of synergistic components. In addition, it can be suggested that a mechanistic cooperation exists between enzyme components with identical hydrolytic activities on β-1,4-linkages but with different structural preferences on the substrate.
The difference between the cellulase activity from mutant SM1 and that from the wild type can be attributed to the complex formation via dockerin-cohesin interaction, in combination with the ability of the scaffoldin to hold the complex on the crystalline substrate via its CBM3 carbohydrate-binding module. An identical enzyme composition of simultaneously present enzyme components was found in the mutant extract. The synergism model was verified by the absence of synergism in the mutant lacking the complex. However, the high degree of synergism in the wild type was surprising. Whether this synergism is the result of the complex alone, whether the substrate binding via CipA-CBM3 is crucial, and whether certain enzymes play pivotal roles here have yet to be evaluated by further experiments.
The tight screening scheme for nonadsorbing mutants of C. thermocellum yielded isolates severely impaired in the hydrolysis of crystalline cellulose, but not in their abilities to hydrolyze soluble β-glucans. Consequently, the mutants were different from those isolated earlier from C. thermocellum, which were obviously regulation defective (3), or from C. cellulolyticum, which were defective in the production of a part of the cellulosomal components (19). The mutant SM1 is the first genetically defined mutant of any cellulosome-producing bacterium that produces the dockerin-containing cellulases but does not assemble them into the full complex. The mutant evidently fully retains the ability to secrete the exoenzymes in a wild-type pattern, but not complex bound. This allows the comparison of an identical native set of cellulases and other glycoside-hydrolases in complex-bound and soluble forms and the quantification of the effect of complex formation for the synergism on refractive, insoluble substrates, such as cellulose.
These "soluble" enzymes degrade soluble β-glucans as effectively as the wild type. However, the hydrolysis of microcrystalline cellulose was diminished by about 15-fold for mutant SM1 and progressively less for the other mutants. The degree of crystalline cellulose degradation was directly related to the reduction of complex size. The difference between the mutants and the wild type is likely to be even larger than indicated by the numbers in Table 2: the degradative determination of crystalline cellulose MN300 may be distorted by amorphic regions, which are degraded by endoglucanase activities. This degradation is not dependent on synergistic enzyme interaction. Moreover, the conditions used for cellulosome preparation do not necessarily allow collecting cellulosomes to be as active as they would be in vivo. Wild-type cellulosome activity could thus have been underestimated. However, the mutants form an excellent tool for future investigations of the basis for the extraordinarily high efficiency of cellulosomal cellulose degradation.
We are very grateful to W. L. Staudenbauer for countless stimulating discussions and to A. Schwarz, C. Tardif, and E. A. Bayer for discussing and commenting on the manuscript. The preparation of the mutants and initial measurements were performed by E. Jouaux and N. Schantz in our laboratory.
Published ahead of print on 11 April 2008. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»