Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, July 2008, p. 4559-4567, Vol. 190, No. 13
0021-9193/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JB.01535-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Departments of Microbiology,1 Pathology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland,2 Protein Science Group, Department of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent CT2 7NJ, United Kingdom,3 Department of Vaccinology, Helmholtz Center of Infection Research, Braunschweig, D-38124, Germany4
Received 24 September 2007/ Accepted 18 April 2008
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. 3-HPA production and metabolism in L. reuteri.
|
In Enterobacteriaceae like Salmonella (27) and Klebsiella (50), the metabolosome-associated propanediol utilization operon specifies enzymes for a dismutation that converts 1,2-PD (via propionaldehyde) to approximately equal amounts of n-propanol (reduced) and propionate (oxidized). ATP is produced via substrate-level phosphorylation: 2 (CH3-CH(OH)-CH2OH) + ADP + Pi
CH3-CH2-COOH + CH3-CH2-CH2OH + ATP + 2H2O.
Because unlike most other lactic acid bacteria, L. reuteri CRL1098 (48) (a lactic acid bacterium isolated from sourdough) produces cobalamin due to the presence of a multigene operon resembling that present in Salmonella and Listeria (37), we hypothesized that, as in Enterobacteriaceae and other gram-negative bacteria, this capacity was due to horizontally acquired genes which also specified production of a metabolosome containing a diol dehydratase. No demonstration of 1,2-PD utilization or bacterial microcompartment production in L. reuteri strains has previously been reported. We show that in L. reuteri 20016 (the type strain, originally isolated from human feces), a bacterial microcompartment is present, and inducible 1,2-PD utilization occurs, with disproportionation to propionate and propanol. Cobalamin is also synthesized. Preliminary analysis of genome sequence data shows the presence of linked cobalamin synthesis and propanediol utilization operons as in gram-negative bacteria, with a distinct gram-positive CRE potentially regulating gene transcription in a Lactobacillus background.
|
|
|---|
Isolation of metabolosomes and protein separation. Protein preparations were initially made by a modification of a published procedure (14). Briefly, L. reuteri grown in MRS broth containing 1,2-PD and glucose was harvested by centrifugation at 4,000 x g for 10 min. The pelleted cells were washed with 300 ml lysozyme buffer (50 mM Tris-Cl, 0.6 M sucrose, 5 mM EDTA, 0.2% 1,2-PD [pH 8.0]), resuspended in 30 ml of the same buffer containing 5 mg/ml lysozyme, and incubated at 37°C for 2 h with occasional agitation. All further steps were carried out at 4°C. Lysozyme-treated cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 7,500 x g for 15 min, washed with lysozyme buffer, and resuspended in sonication buffer (50 mM Tris-Cl, 2 mM EDTA, 0.2% 1,2-PD [pH 8.0]) at approximately 0.1 g wet cell mass per ml. Cells were lysed by sonication, four 120-s bursts with 1-min cooling intervals on ice, using SoniPrep 150 (MSE UK Ltd). The crude cell extract obtained by sonication was mixed with an equal volume of BPER-II (Pierce, Rockford, IL) supplemented with 400 mM NaCl and 20 mM MgCl2 and incubated for 30 min at 4°C with shaking. Unlysed cells were removed by centrifugation at 12,000 x g for 10 min. The resulting supernatant was subjected to ultracentrifugation (Beckman SW-40 Ti rotor) at 49,000 x g for 90 min. The crude protein pellet was resuspended in 5 ml of TEMP buffer (50 mM Tris-Cl, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM MgCl2, 0.2% 1,2-PD [pH 8.0]) and clarified by centrifugation at 12,000 x g for 10 min. The clarified preparation was layered onto four 11-ml, 35%-to-65% (wt/vol) sucrose density gradients and centrifuged at 30,000 x g for 16 h. Fractions including the pellet were taken and assayed for diol dehydratase activity. Dehydratase-positive fractions were retained in sucrose buffer, and the pellet was resuspended in 1 ml of TEMP buffer and clarified by centrifugation before electron microscopy. Protein preparations for peptide fingerprinting were made by cell sonication as described above (omitting lysozyme and admixture with BPER-II), with subsequent fractionation of the total crude cell lysate by sucrose density gradient centrifugation, selecting diol dehydratase-positive fractions for sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) separation.
Protein separation. Aliquots (50 µg) of extracted protein were separated by SDS-PAGE using a 12.5% polyacrylamide gel under denaturing conditions (20) in a MiniProtean apparatus (Bio-Rad) and stained with Coomassie brilliant blue R250.
Peptide fingerprinting. Bands were excised from the polyacrylamide gel and subjected to in-gel tryptic digestion (40). Peptides were analyzed by MALDI-TOF-MS (matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectroscopy) using a 20-mg/ml solution of 1,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid dissolved in 1 part acetonitrile, 2 parts trifluoroacetic acid as the matrix. Mass spectra were collected on a Bruker UltraFlex mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) that had been calibrated with a peptide calibration standard (1,000 to 4,000 Da) from Bruker (part 206195). Peptide masses were determined using Xmass (version 5.1.5; Bruker). Proteins were identified by peptide mass fingerprinting utilizing the Mascot search engine. Positive matches were ranked using the built-in Mowse score system of Mascot (Matrix Science, Boston, MA).
Electron microscopy. The L. reuteri cell pellet was prefixed in 2.0% (vol/vol) glutaraldehyde, 2.5% paraformaldehyde in 165 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, for 90 min. The prefixed pellet was postfixed in 2.0% (wt/vol) osmium tetroxide in 165 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.2, for 120 min, followed by dehydration in an ethanol series. Embedment was done in epoxy resin (43a). Ultrathin sections (90 nm) were poststained with 4% (wt/vol) aqueous uranyl acetate and analyzed in zero-loss bright-field mode in an energy-filtered transmission electron microscope (Zeiss CEM 902; Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). Isolated polyhedral bodies were fixed in 1% (vol/vol) glutaraldehyde, and after adsorption to Formvar-carbon-coated grids they were negatively stained with 2% (wt/vol) uranylacetate, pH 4.5. Samples were analyzed with an energy-filtered transmission electron microscope, and images were recorded, in general, with a charge-coupled-device camera (Proscan Electronic Systems, Scheuring, Germany).
Purification of diol dehydratase. The purification procedure for diol dehydratase was carried out as described previously (38a, 39a). L. reuteri cells harvested by centrifugation at 3,000 x g for 10 min were washed twice in K2HPO4 buffer I (10 mM, pH 7.2, 1 mM dithiothreitol and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) and then washed in 10 ml of degassed K2HPO4 buffer II (10 mM, pH 7.2 containing 5 mM dithiothreitol). Cell lysis was performed using SoniPrep 150 (MSE UK Ltd) fitted with a 9-mm-diameter disrupter horn and an output of 12 µm. One milligram of DNase I was added to the lysed cells, and the cell debris was removed by centrifugation at two different reactive centrifugal forces (3,000 x g for 10 min and 15,500 x g for 20 min).
The extract was homogenized with 1 volume of ammonium sulfate solution at 456 g/liter to obtain 40% saturation. The homogenate was incubated on ice for 1 h and centrifuged at 15,500 g for 20 min. The pellet containing the enzyme was resuspended in 1 ml of K2HPO4 buffer II, and the active fraction was purified by gel exclusion chromatography. The enzyme preparation was loaded onto a Sephacryl S300H (Sigma) column (30 by 1.5 cm) equilibrated with K2HPO4 buffer II. Chromatography was conducted at a flow rate of 0.35 ml/min. Fractions possessing the highest dehydratase activity were pooled and stored at –70°C until further use.
Diol dehydratase assay. The activity of diol dehydratase was measured by the 3-methyl-2-benzothiazolinone hydrazone method (53). One unit of diol dehydratase activity is defined as the amount of enzyme that catalyzes the formation of 1 µmol of propionaldehyde per min per mg protein from 0.2 M 1,2-PD (propanediol is used because of rapid inactivation of the enzyme over periods of more than a minute by glycerol [53]). The presence of differential diol dehydratase and glycerol dehydratase activities in organisms grown on different substrates was sought by establishing the ratio of glycerol dehydrating and 1,2-PD-dehydrating activities, measured by duplicate 1-min assays using glycerol and 1,2-PD as substrates [(glycerol/propanediol)1 min], as described by Toraya and Fukui (49).
Acrolein (prop-2-enal) detection. Acrolein (prop-2-enal) detection as a quantitative assay of reuterin (3-HPA) production was carried out by the method of Smiley and Sobolev (43), as practiced by Rodriguez et al. (32) with modifications: following induction overnight in MRS-MOD broth plus glycerol (20 mM) and/or 1,2-PD (50 mM), cultures were standardized at the same optical density (600 nm) with the addition of MRS-MOD. Supernatants (300 µl) from 1 ml of culture incubated for 1 h in MRS-MOD with glycerol (200 mM) and/or 1,2-PD (50 mM) were mixed with 150 µl of tryptophan solution (3 g/1 in 0.1 mol/l HCl) and 600 µl of 35% HCl. The mixture was heated at 60°C for 5 min. 3-HPA (reuterin) produced by bacterial metabolism was detected by dehydration to acrolein (prop-2-enal), developing a yellow color assayed at 490 nm against an acrolein standard. Bacterium-free culture media were assayed as controls.
Cobalamin production. Cobalamin production was determined using a bioassay on sonicated cells grown in synthetic vitamin B12 assay broth (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) at 37°C for 3 days. Bioassay plates were prepared as described previously (31) with two different indicator strains (Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium metE cysG, AR3612, and S. enterica serovar Typhimurium cbiB metE, AR2680) (31). AR2680 requires cobinamide or later intermediates for restoration of growth, whereas AR3612 can grow in the presence of the earlier intermediate cobyric acid.
1,2-PD metabolism. L. reuteri was grown in MRS-MOD medium supplemented with 50 mM 1,2-PD at 37°C under anaerobic conditions for 8 days. Two-milliliter samples were removed at different time points and pelleted. Supernatant was stored at –20°C until the assays were carried out. We used a gas chromatography assay following a published method (3) using a Chrompack CP-Sil 5 CB column, 25 m x 0.25 mm with a 0.4-µm film thickness (stationary phase, 100% dimethylpolysiloxane). 1,2-PD and its metabolites (1-propanol, propionic acid, and propionaldehyde) were measured by using 20 mM 1-butanol as an internal concentration standard. The temperature program was set at 80°C for 2 min followed by a 20°C/min temperature increase to 160°C. The total time for chromatographic separation of each sample was 10 min.
PCR. The pdu operon from L. reuteri was amplified using primers containing SalI restriction sites (forward primer, 5'-AGATGTCGACTTTCAACGGTGATGAGTGGA-3', and reverse primer, 5'-AGATGTCGACTTGTGGCCATGATTTAGCAA-3'). Primers were designed with Primer3 (33) based on a region of the genome of L. reuteri DSM 20016T (genome sequence kindly made available by Gerald Tannock) determined by TBLASTX searching to be more than 70% identical to the published Lactobacillus collinoides diol dehydratase pdu operon (39). PCR amplification was carried out with a hot-start enzyme possessing 3'-to-5' proofreading activity, Platinum HiFi Taq DNA polymerase (Invitrogen), using the following program: initial denaturation at 94°C for 2 min; 30 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 58°C for 30 s, and 68°C for 22 min; and a final elongation at 68°C for 25 min. The amplicon was purified with a gel extraction kit (Qiagen) and digested with the restriction enzyme PstI (New England Biolabs).
DNA sequence analysis. Artemis (34) was used to define open reading frames in a section of the L. reuteri DSM 20016T genome sequence which was identified by BLASTP (2) similarity with cob-pdu operon genes from L. collinoides (39) and GenBank. Similar segments were sought in other Lactobacillus sequences in GenBank. A CRE motif search was carried out using the program DNA-pattern at the regulatory sequences analysis tools website (http://rsat.ulb.ac.be) (54) with the input string WTGNAANCGNWNNCW (25) on the DNA sequence contig from L. reuteri DSM 20016T incorporating the pdu operon. The pocR-pduA intergenic interval in the various identified Lactobacillus spp. was examined with DNA-pattern, MEME (5), and Virtual Footprint (26). Promoter prediction was performed with BPROM (software available from SoftBerry (Mount Kisco, NY).
Primer extension analysis. Total RNA was isolated using ToTALLY RNA (Ambion) from L. reuteri grown in MRS-MOD medium supplemented with either 50 mM 1,2-PD or 50 mM 1,2-PD plus 100 mM glucose. Primer extension reactions were carried out as described by Ventura et al. (55), with some modifications. Briefly, around 15 to 20 µg of the RNA from the above-described step was mixed with 1 pmol of primer (5'CAGCTTTTACCATTGCATCAGCAGC-3') labeled with IRD800 (MWG Biotech) and 2 µl of buffer H (2 M NaCl, 50 mM PIPES [pH 6.4]). The mixture was denatured at 80°C for 5 min followed by incubation for 60 min at 45°C. After addition of 18 µl of 5x first standard buffer (supplied with Superscript III reverse transcriptase [Invitrogen]; 10 µl of 0.1 M dithiothreitol, 20 µl of a deoxynucleoside triphosphate mix [2.5 mM each], 1 µl of 200 U/µl Superscript III reverse transcriptase, and 41 µl of double-distilled water), the mixture was incubated at 45°C for 2 h. The product was then precipitated with 250 µl of ethanol/acetone (1:1), and the pellet was washed with 80% ice-cold ethanol and dissolved in 4 µl of distilled water. The cDNA was separated on an 8% polyacrylamide-urea gel along with the mixture from a sequencing reaction (Thermo Sequence fluorescently labeled primer cycle sequencing kit; Amersham) conducted with the same primer that was used for the primer extension reaction and detected with a LiCor sequencer machine.
Nucleotide sequence accession number. The DNA sequence shown in Fig. 3 has been deposited in GenBank with accession no. EU167935.
![]() View larger version (56K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. SDS-PAGE separation of L. reuteri total cell protein fractions and MALDI-TOF-identified proteins. Lane 1, protein molecular weight marker. Lane 2, diol dehydratase-positive fraction 1. Lane 3, diol dehydratase-positive fraction 2 (immediately below fraction 1 in sucrose density gradient). L. reuteri was grown in MRS broth supplemented with 15 mM glucose and 50 mM 1,2-PD at 37°C for 36 h.
|
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (92K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. L. reuteri 20016 produces metabolosomes. (a) Cell section electron micrograph after growth in MRS broth supplemented with 65 mM 1,2-PD and 15 mM glucose at 37°C for 18 h. (b) Extracted metabolosomes from cells grown as for panel a. (c) Enlarged view of metabolosomes shown in panel d. Arrowheads indicate a single-layer shell. (d) L. reuteri grown on MRS broth supplemented with 65 mM 1,2-PD at 37°C for 18 h. Arrows indicate metabolosomes.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. L. reuteri diol dehydratase activity after 36 h incubation with different substrates
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Peptide mass fingerprinting of metabolosome components
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. 3-HPA (reuterin) production from glycerol and/or propanediol in 1 h by L. reuteri strains induced with glycerol or with glycerol and 1,2-PDa
|
![]() View larger version (20K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Growth characteristics of L. reuteri strains and anaerobic propanediol metabolism. (a) Growth curves of L. reuteri 20016 and L. reuteri 100-23 in MRS-MOD at the indicated times postinoculation. O.D., optical density at 600 nm. — , L. reuteri 20016 with 50 mM glucose. . . . . . , L. reuteri 20016 with 50 mM 1,2-PD. . . . . . , L. reuteri 20016, unsupplemented. . . . . . , L. reuteri 100-23 with 50 mM glucose. — , L. reuteri 100-23 with 50 mM 1,2-PD. (b) Propanediol metabolism by L. reuteri 20016 or L. reuteri 100-23 in MRS-MOD with 1,2-PD at the indicated times postinoculation. Metabolite concentrations are shown. . . . . . , propanediol concentration in bacterium-free control. , L. reuteri 100-23, propanediol concentration. — , L. reuteri 20016, propanediol concentration. , L. reuteri 20016, propanol concentration. , L. reuteri 20016, propionate concentration. , L. reuteri 20016, propionaldehyde concentration.
|
![]() View larger version (15K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. pdu operon of L. reuteri. Predicted open reading frame gene assignment by comparison with S. enterica serovar Typhimurium (nomenclature of labeled cobalamin synthesis genes follows Salmonella convention). Gene cluster generated with 3BASE sequence file viewer (http://3base.bham.ac.uk/cgi-bin/fileprepare.cgi). The consensus CRE sequence is boxed, predicted –35 and –10 promoter sequences and the ribosomal binding site are underlined, and the start codon of pduA is in bold. The transcriptional start site when induced by propanediol is in larger type. The extent of PCR products and predicted restriction sites are shown below the operon.
|
![]() View larger version (29K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. pduA gene transcription start site on propanediol induction. Primer extension products were obtained by using total RNA extracted from L. reuteri grown on MRS-MOD medium supplemented with 50 mM 1,2-PD (lane 1) and 50 mM 1,2-PD plus 100 mM glucose (lane 2). The start point of transcription is boxed.
|
|
|
|---|
The conversion of 1,2-PD to propanol and propionate with the transient presence of propionaldehyde we have observed (Fig. 4b) suggests a pathway as described for 1,2-PD utilization in Salmonella (8, 22, 36) (Fig. 7). Genes specifying all the enzymes required (Fig. 7) were present in the L. reuteri F275 (DSM 20016) pdu operon (Fig. 5).
![]() View larger version (29K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Proposed pathway of cobalamin-dependent 1,2-PD metabolism in L. reuteri. Metabolic endpoints are underlined; asterisks indicate metabolic intermediates retained within the metabolosome.
|
The enzyme specified by the pdu operon pduCDE genes, diol dehydratase, is responsible for conversion of 1,2-PD to the intermediate propionaldehyde. Interestingly, the enzyme responsible for glycerol conversion to 3-HPA in L. reuteri (Fig. 1) was previously described as a glycerol dehydratase (47) but is capable of acting as a propanediol dehydratase (47). The presence of two isofunctional related enzymes (glycerol and propanediol dehydratase) in L. reuteri, as in K. pneumoniae, was inferred from the existence of two peaks of propanediol dehydratase activity on cell extracts separated by DEAE-cellulose chromatography (47). This left the possibility that reuterin production could be dependent on either one of two isofunctional enzymes. The L. reuteri F275 (DSM 20016) genome sequence has recently been circularized (http://genome.jgi-psf.org/finished_microbes/lacre/lacre.info.html), and BLAST searching does not reveal a distinct glycerol dehydratase in addition to the diol dehydratase linked with cobalamin synthesis. That is, the only candidate enzyme identifiable from the genome sequence for production of 3-HPA from glycerol forming the antimicrobial reuterin (56) is the metabolosome-associated propanediol-induced diol dehydratase we describe. Supporting this, we found no phenotypic evidence of a distinct glycerol-induced dehydratase in L. reuteri 20016 (Table 1), and maximal reuterin production by L. reuteri 20016 was associated with preincubation with 1,2-PD in addition to glycerol (Table 3). Very small amounts of reuterin were produced in the absence of 1,2-PD under preincubation or assay conditions (Table 3). L. reuteri 100-23, lacking the metabolosome-associated diol dehydratase in its unpublished genome sequence, was unable to synthesize more than trace amounts of reuterin (at most, less than 6% of that detected from L. reuteri 20016) (Table 3) and had very low levels of diol dehydratase activity, irrespective of substrate induction (Table 1).
While appearances of individual metabolosomes were consistent with electron microscopy reports on Salmonella (8, 14, 41), fewer metabolosomes were observed in each bacterial cell, and metabolosomes were agglomerated (Fig. 2a, c, and d). Similar electron microscopy appearances have been reported from L. collinoides (38), which also expresses a metabolosome-associated diol dehydratase (39) but does not synthesize cobalamin. Biochemical data supported these qualitative electron microscopy appearances, showing a reduced specific enzyme activity compared with gram-negative organisms: maximal diol dehydratase activity per mg of whole cell extract was comparable with that reported for L. collinoides (39) and approximately a quarter of that reported for Salmonella (14).
Although the pdu operon is substantially similar in gene number and order in Salmonella and L. reuteri, DNA sequence analysis upstream of the pdu operon suggests that it may be regulated differently (Fig. 4). The linked cob and pdu metabolosome operons in a gram-negative background are regulated by Crp and Arc (1). In Lactobacillus spp., as for other gram-positive organisms (35), catabolite repression generally occurs via HPr [HPr(Ser-P)], the small phosphocarrier protein of the phosphoenolpyruvate-sugar phosphotransferase system, and CcpA protein (6, 17), operating via short CREs in the DNA sequence (4, 17, 25). Although 1,2-PD utilization operons have been described for other Lactobacillus species, CREs have not previously been noted in connection with them. We identified a CRE consensus sequence in the L. reuteri pdu operon upstream of pduA, the first gene in the pdu operon. We found complete or partial CRE sequences upstream of pduA in all other available DNA sequences from Lactobacillus spp. containing this operon. In L. reuteri, the center of the CRE is 17 bp downstream of the transcription start site of the initial gene in the pdu operon when induced by 1,2-PD and +22 bp relative to the end of the putative –10 sequence (Fig. 5). In Lactococcus lactis, a CRE in this orientation is associated with strong CcpA-dependent repression (59).
The requirement for a complex 22-gene 1,2-PD utilization operon for this apparently simple process has been attributed to the need to contain the intermediate compound propionaldehyde within a protein compartment or metabolosome, either to reduce toxicity (36) or to prevent its loss as a gas by the cell (29). As reported for metabolosome-containing S. enterica metabolizing 1,2-PD (36), we detected only small amounts of propionaldehyde in culture supernatants of 1,2-PD-metabolizing L. reuteri (Fig. 3b), suggesting retention within the metabolosome. It has been suggested that in the metabolosome associated with the ethanolamine utilization operon in S. enterica, the mechanism of aldehyde retention is based on reduced loss of the aldehyde intermediate (in this case acetaldehyde) by evaporation, possibly by creating a low pH within the compartment, rendering aldehydes more likely to convert to a less volatile acetal (29). However, with regard to the S. enterica 1,2-PD utilization metabolosome, assays of pduA deletion mutants not producing the metabolosome shell but retaining metabolic activity showed that increased propionaldehyde evaporation was not a major factor affecting 1,2-PD metabolism (36). If, as we suggest, the metabolosome-associated diol dehydratase is also responsible for reuterin (3-HPA) production from glycerol, then the fact that this aldehyde is excreted by the organism suggests that either 3-HPA is not produced within the aldehyde-retaining metabolosome (i.e., a significant amount of diol dehydratase is outside the metabolosome in the cytoplasm, unlike the situation in Salmonella [8]) or the NAD-dependent oxidoreductase which removes 3-HPA in L. reuteri by conversion to 1,3-propanediol (Fig. 1) might not be localized in the metabolosome in the same way that PduP coenzyme A-acylating propionaldehyde dehydrogenase is present within the 1,2-PD-metabolizing metabolosome (22) (Fig. 7). That is, effective aldehyde retention by the metabolosome requires the presence of specific aldehyde-metabolizing enzymes within the metabolosome.
Carboxysomes in cyanobacteria affect internal cytoplasmic pH (7) and concentrate protons. There is recent evidence for regulation of the pdu operon by external pH in L. reuteri. During revision of the manuscript it was reported that gene transcription assays using a DNA microarray based on partial genome sequence data from L. reuteri ATCC 55730 showed that 11 genes from the pdu operon were downregulated by dilution and incubation at pH 5.1 versus pH 2.7 (57). Lactobacilli, including L. reuteri, are heterotrophic fermentative organisms that obtain energy by substrate-level phosphorylation and require high levels of different nutrients to maintain a sufficient proton motive force for viability (18). While neutrophilic bacteria like Escherichia coli respond to changes in external pH (pHe) by maintaining a relatively constant internal pH (pHi) at the expense of a large proton gradient across the cell wall, fermentative lactic acid bacteria decrease pHi in response to decreasing pHe, to maintain a constant transmembrane proton gradient (9, 42). Proton concentration within Lactobacillus metabolosomes could potentially raise the pHi of the remaining cytoplasm, compromising efforts to maintain a constant transmembrane proton gradient in acidified growth media.
However, we have shown that the metabolosome-associated propanediol utilization operon is 1,2-PD induced as in gram-negative organisms and functions in a Lactobacillus intracellular background, despite differences in pH homeostasis from the organisms in which it has been mainly studied to date. This finding reinforces the evidence (21) that this very large and complex metabolic operon is nevertheless frequently horizontally transmitted between different bacteria. Further study of the constraints of operating in a fermentative background will shed new light on the electrochemical properties of the metabolosome.
Nicolas Sauvageot kindly gave advice on glycerol and propanediol metabolism in L. collinoides and access to thesis data. Dan Walsh and David Cocker helped with propanol and propionate assays. Paddy O'Reilly gave help and advice on Lactobacillus culture media. We thank Mary O'Connell Motherway and Eileen Dilane for assistance with the primer extension protocol. The skillful work of Ingeborg Kristen (HZI, Braunschweig) in electron microscopic sample preparation is gratefully acknowledged The sequence data from L. reuteri 20016T and L. reuteri 100-23 were produced by the U.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute (http://www.jgi.doe.gov/) and were generously made available by Gerald Tannock and Jens Walter.
Published ahead of print on 9 May 2008. ![]()
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»