Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, January 2008, p. 743-746, Vol. 190, No. 2
0021-9193/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JB.01135-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
,
MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QH, United Kingdom
Received 18 July 2007/ Accepted 28 September 2007
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (40K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. (A) Organization of the agr locus in S. aureus, with Pfam domains highlighted in color. nt, nucleotides. (B) Cartoon of the basic interactions of the agr system in S. aureus. The interactions of the proteins encoded by the agrBDCA operon lead to a positive-feedback loop and further agrBDCA expression. Blue arrows, phosphorylation; green arrows, transcriptional interactions. RNAIII and hld, which encodes -lysin, are controlled by the same promoter and share the same transcript. The second promoter controls agrBDCA. The agrC and agrA genes encode the transmembrane kinase which senses the AIP (cyan circles) and a response regulator (red hexagon) which is phosphorylated by AgrC and affects changes in gene expression, respectively. Phosphorylation of the AgrA receiver domain by AgrC leads to AgrA activation and DNA binding. AgrA positively regulates transcription of the agr operon. This results in the production of a high level of AIP, leading to even higher agr expression. Apart from the agrBDCA promoter, another promoter positively regulated by AgrA is the one controlling expression of a small noncoding RNA, RNAIII. The RNAIII promoter is located next to the agrBDCA promoter but is transcribed in the opposite direction. RNAIII rather than AgrA is the immediate regulator of most of the genes regulated by the agr operon. (C) Tree of firmicutes based on ribosomal sequences with bootstrap values (1,000 iterations). Where applicable, the genomic organization of the agr locus homologue is depicted to the right of the operational taxonomic unit. One instantly obvious finding is that homologues of the agr system are spread across firmicutes and are not limited to a single phylogenetic class. Furthermore, the genomic organization of the agr system is conserved outside the family Staphylococcaceae, that is to say, in most cases agrB is linked to a two-component signal transduction system. While each genome contained only a single copy of the AgrD domain, some contained more than one copy of the AgrB domain: M. thermoacetica (three copies), D. hafniense Y51 (three copies), C. perfringens (two copies), and C. perfringens ATCC 13124 (two copies). (D) Venn diagram showing numbers of differentially expressed genes and how many orthologous clusters are differentially expressed in more than one genome.
|
To investigate whether the agr system is an evolutionarily ancient system, we built two phylogenetic trees by use of different methods. The first tree was built from an alignment of AgrB homologues. The second tree was built from an alignment of AgrB, AgrD, AgrC, and AgrA homologues, whose sequences were concatenated (see the supplemental material). The topology of these trees should agree with the topology of the tree built from ribosomal sequences if agr is inherited only vertically. Although these trees generally agree with each other and the ribosomal tree, the agr locus of Clostridium acetobutylicum clusters with Listeriaceae. Clostridium acetobutylicum is, however, a member of the class Clostridia, therefore making its agr system a candidate for horizontal gene transfer. This is also supported by AgrD of Clostridium acetobutylicum showing remarkable similarity to AgrD of Listeriaceae (Fig. 2). To our knowledge, this would be the first reported instance of horizontal gene transfer between Clostridia and Listeriaceae.
![]() View larger version (49K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Alignment of potential AgrD homologues. GenBank identifiers are given in the column to the right. Red, experimentally determined signaling peptides; yellow background, residues strongly conserved across the homologues; green background, residues conserved between Listeria and Clostridium acetobutylicum. Boldface type shows potential AgrD homologues which were identified by genomic context (linkage to AgrB) rather than by homology. The conserved cysteine, which is required for the formation of the thiolactone ring, and the Pro-X-X-Pro motif are highlighted at the top of the alignment (see text for details).
|
In the Clostridium perfringens strains as well as in Bacillus halodurans, we were able to identify short open reading frames which might have the function of agrD without having detectable sequence similarity to it (marked with the number 4 in Fig. 1C and highlighted in bold in Fig. 2). Although they lack significant sequence similarity to known AgrD homologues, they possess key sequence features connected to AIP function: a central cysteine residue which is required for the formation of the thiolactone ring (9) and a Pro-X-X-Pro motif which might serve as a recognition site for AgrB (16) (Fig. 2).
Next, we asked whether the genes which are transcriptionally regulated by agr are conserved between different species with a known agr quorum-sensing system. Differences in gene expression levels between wild-type and agr knockout strains have previously been obtained for Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1 (14), Enterococcus faecalis OG1RF (1), Staphylococcus aureus NCTC 8325 (4), Staphylococcus aureus UAMS-1 (2), and Staphylococcus epidermidis (15). We used these data to compare genes which are differentially expressed in these agr mutants (see Fig. S3 in the supplemental material). According to our criteria (see the supplemental material), 175 genes were differentially expressed in Staphylococcus aureus, 54 in Lactobacillus plantarum, 54 in Enterococcus faecalis, and 238 in Staphylococcus epidermidis. After defining clusters of orthologous genes, we asked if there were any orthologues which were differentially expressed in all three genomes. We did not find any cluster which was differentially regulated in all three genomes (Fig. 1D). Therefore, it appears that there is no significant propensity for orthologous genes to be regulated by the agr system in the three different species. Using the Infernal program (5) to detect small noncoding RNAs, we found that regulation of genes by agr via the global regulator RNAIII (Fig. 1B) occurred only in the Staphylococcus species. This suggests that RNAIII is an evolutionary innovation unique to Staphylococcaceae and that the downstream regulators under the control of agr can evolve rapidly.
In agreement with previous observations, genes which are involved in biofilm formation, such as those encoding exopolysaccharide biosynthesis proteins, are downregulated by agr in Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis (8). Some exopolysaccharide biosynthesis genes, such as those of the cps2 cluster, are upregulated in Lactobacillus plantarum. This seems to contradict the observation that deletion of lamA, the agrA homologue, has the phenotypic effect of reduced adherence to a glass substratum compared to results for the wild type. The production of virulence proteins is upregulated by the agr-like system in Enterococcus faecalis and Staphylococcus aureus N315, which are both virulent. A clear conclusion is that the agr system is not a universal regulator of virulence factors only and is also active in nonpathogenic firmicutes. Furthermore, we conclude that although the functions which are regulated, including biofilm formation, are similar, the individual genes are not. This suggests that the regulatory network controlled by agr is flexible and can adapt rapidly to changing environments. Therefore, the agr system might be of use in the emerging field of synthetic biology.
A.W. and M.M.B. thank Ingmar Schäfer, Aswin Seshasayee, and Subhajyoti De for critically reading the manuscript.
Published ahead of print on 12 October 2007. ![]()
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://jb.asm.org/. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»