Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, October 2008, p. 6559-6567, Vol. 190, No. 20
0021-9193/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JB.00574-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Maren Mix,1,
Uta Meyer,1,
Stefan Mikkat,2
Michael O. Glocker,2
Hubert Bahl,1 and
Ralf-Jörg Fischer1*
Division of Microbiology, Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Rostock, Albert-Einstein-Straße 3, D-18051 Rostock, Germany,1 Proteome Center Rostock, Medical Faculty, University of Rostock, Schillingallee 69, D-18057 Rostock, Germany2
Received 25 April 2008/ Accepted 30 July 2008
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Up to now, only a little about the phosphate-dependent gene regulation in C. acetobutylicum has been determined, e.g., the existence of a clostridial phosphate (Pho) regulon, a set of genes for which transcription is controlled by PhoP (20, 55). The Pho regulon genes in several bacteria are described as being controlled by a two-component regulatory system, usually consisting of a membrane-associated sensor kinase and a cytosolic response regulator (16, 20, 26, 55, 56). The sensor kinases are supposed to detect the extracellular phosphate concentration via an N-terminal sensor domain situated between two transmembrane domains. When the phosphate concentration in the environment drops below a threshold concentration, conformational changes activate the C-terminal autokinase domain, leading to autophosphorylation of a specific conserved histidine residue. The phosphate group is then further transferred to the N-terminal receiver domain of the response regulator (24). Phosphorylation results in a changed binding affinity of the C-terminal domain of the response regulator to conserved DNA motifs, so-called Pho boxes which have been found for several bacteria, e.g., Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis (25, 29). Binding of the phosphorylated response regulator normally enhances the induction of transcription of genes but can also cause downregulation of transcription when Pho boxes are encoded on the noncoding DNA strand of B. subtilis (28).
In E. coli, the Pho regulon is under the control of the two-component system PhoBR and comprises at least 38 different genes (55), whereas in B. subtilis, the 34 genes of the Pho regulon are regulated mainly by the homologous two-component system PhoPR (3, 5, 20, 53). Interestingly, many of these genes, e.g., alkaline phosphatase genes (9, 12, 19, 49) and the genes which are responsible for teichuronic acid synthesis or teichoic acid synthesis (except for tagA), are not annotated for C. acetobutylicum (5, 29, 45). An exception is the pst operon, coding for a high-affinity Pi uptake system. This is essentially composed of an ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter and usually belongs to the Pho regulon (2, 44, 46). For C. acetobutylicum, we recently described the pst operon as a potential first member of a Pho regulon and suggested a putative Pho box motif (14).
Here, we report on the transcriptional analysis of the phoPR gene locus and the characterization of encoded proteins as a two-component regulatory system which seems to be involved in the transcriptional regulation of the pst operon and therefore might be a key regulator for phosphate-dependent gene regulation in C. acetobutylicum.
|
|
|---|
Isolation of DNA and preparation of total RNA. Chromosomal DNA of C. acetobutylicum from batch cultures grown in 2x YTG medium (10 g/liter yeast extract, 16 g/liter tryptone, 4 g/liter glucose, 4 g/liter Nacl) (41) was isolated by following the protocol described by Fischer et al. (14). Total RNA was purified using a modified hot phenol protocol as described by Oelmüller et al. (40).
RT-PCR and primer extension. Reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) and primer extension methods were as reported elsewhere (14). Oligonucleotides used in this work are given in Table 1. In parallel to the primer extension experiments, sequencing reactions were carried out using the same IRD800-labeled oligonucleotide and plasmid DNA (pSN1–) as the template. Labeled products were separated and analyzed together by using a denaturing sequencing polyacrylamide gel with a LI-COR 4200 sequencer according to the instructions of the manufacturer (MWG-Biotech, Ebersberg, Germany). Plasmid pSN1– is a derivative of pBluescript II SK(+) (Stratagene, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) containing a EcoRI-trimmed 3,241-bp PCR fragment (primers 2032/1 and phoR2/3') (Table 1) spanning the open reading frames cac1699, cac1700 (phoP), and cac1701 (phoR).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Oligonucleotides
|
Peptide mass fingerprinting by MALDI-TOF MS. Protein spots were picked from colloidal Coomassie blue-stained 2-DE gels (37) automatically using a Flexys Proteomics picker (Genomic Solutions, Ann Arbor, MI) (23) or manually with a cut pipette tip. The gel plugs were destained, and proteins were digested with trypsin (sequencing-grade trypsin, 10 ng/µl in 3 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.5]; Promega, Madison, WI) or endoproteinase AspN (5.0 ng/µl in 3 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.5]; Roche, Mannheim, Germany). The resulting peptide-containing solutions were prepared on matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI) targets (384/600-µm AnchorChip; Bruker Daltonik, Bremen, Germany) (39), and peptide masses were measured by MALDI-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) using a Reflex III mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonik) (15).
A mass tolerance of 100 ppm and one missing cleavage site were allowed. Oxidation of methionine residues was considered a variable modification, and carboxyamidomethylation of cysteines a fixed modification. Searches were restricted to C. acetobutylicum proteins.
Construction of plasmids expressing PhoP N-terminally fused to a streptavidin tag (PhoP Strep-Tag) or truncated PhoR C-terminally fused to maltose binding protein (MBP-*PhoR). Primers PhoR5'2b and PhoR3'1b (Table 1) were used for PCR amplification of the 1,005-bp fragment of phoR lacking the first 720 nucleotides (nt) of this open reading frame (*phoR). Primers PhoP2-5BamHI-B and PhoP2-3PstI-A (Table 1) were used for PCR amplification of phoP. PCRs were carried out with Pwo DNA polymerase (PeqLab Biotechnologie GmbH, Erlangen, Germany) and chromosomal DNA of C. acetobutylicum ATCC 824 as the template. After PstI (MBI Fermentas GmbH, St. Leon-Rot, Germany) and BamHI (Invitrogen Life Technologies GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany) digestion of the amplificates, the *phoR fragment was ligated into PstI- and BamHI-digested, dephosphorylated pMAL-c2X (NEB, Frankfurt/Main, Germany) and the phoP fragment was ligated into the equally treated vector pASK-IBA2 (IBA GmbH, Göttingen, Germany), resulting in plasmids pTF5 and pMM15, respectively.
Overexpression and purification of MBP-*PhoR and PhoP Strep-Tag. A preculture of E. coli BL21CodonPlus(DE3)-RIL (pTF5) was grown in LB medium enriched with 2% (wt/vol) glucose overnight at 37°C with shaking and then inoculated into 200 ml of the same medium at a ratio of 1:100. The cells were further incubated at 30°C until the optical density at 600 nm reached about 0.5. Specific expression of the MBP-*PhoR fusion protein was then induced by the addition of 24 µg/ml isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside, and incubation was continued for another 2 to 3 h. Cells were harvested by centrifugation (7,000 x g at 4°C for 10 min) and stored at –20°C overnight. After suspension in 5 ml of washing buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 200 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithioerythritol, 0.02% [wt/vol] NaN3), cells were disrupted by sonication three times for 1 min each time (20 W at 20 kHz, Ultraschall Desintegrator Sonopuls HD60; Medizin- und Labortechnik KG, Hamburg, Germany), and lysis was microscopically confirmed. After centrifugation (15,000 x g at 4°C for 30 min), the clear supernatant was diluted 1:5 with washing buffer and applied to a 1-ml amylose resin affinity column (NEB) followed by a washing step using 12 ml of the same buffer. Bound proteins were eluted in ten 200-µl fractions using buffer E (washing buffer plus 10 mM maltose) and, after supplementation with glycerin (10%, vol/vol), could be stored at –20°C for a maximum of 30 days.
PhoP Strep-Tag was heterologously synthesized in E. coli DH5
harboring pMM15. Cells grown in LB medium overnight with agitation at 37°C were used to inoculate 800 ml of fresh LB at a ratio of 1:100. The main culture was grown at 30°C until the optical density at 600 nm reached 0.4. For the expression of PhoP Strep-Tag, anhydrotetracycline was added (0.2 µg/ml), and the incubation was resumed; after 3 to 5 h of incubation, the cells were harvested as described above. Frozen cell pellets were thawed, suspended in 1 ml of buffer W (100 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 1 mM EDTA, 150 mM NaCl), and subjected to sonication. Cell debris was sedimented by centrifugation (see above), and the clear supernatant was pipetted onto a 1-ml StrepTactin-Sepharose affinity column (IBA). The column was washed with 5 ml buffer W. The protein bound to the column was eluted in six fractions with 0.5 ml buffer E (buffer W plus 2.5 mM desthiobiotin). Protein fractions were stored at –20°C with 10% (vol/vol) glycerin for up to 30 days.
Determination of protein concentration. Protein concentration was determined using the method described by Bradford (10).
Phosphorylation assays.
For phosphorylation assays, 17 µM PhoP Strep-Tag and 2 µM MBP-*PhoR were incubated together or separately in phosphorylation buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.0], 5 mM MgCl2, 4 mM dithiothreitol) (27) with 10 µCi [
-32P]ATP for 5 to 30 min at room temperature in a total volume of 20 µl. Phosphorylation was stopped by the addition of 5 µl loading buffer (40% [vol/vol] glycerin, 40 mM dithioerythritol, 10% [wt/vol] sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS], 0.4% [wt/vol] bromphenol blue, 250 mM Tris-HCl [pH 6.8]) and cooling on ice. Phosphorylated proteins were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) (12.5%). Gels were dried, and radioactivity was detected by a 30- to 60-min exposure of dried gels to BAS III imaging plates and visualized using a BAS2000 bioimaging analyzer (Fuji, Tokyo, Japan).
Electromobility shift assays. Fragments spanning 120 nt (PF1), 190 nt (PF2), and 389 nt (PF3) of the promoter region of the pst operon of C. acetobutylicum were PCR amplified using the primers pstS-Bam-P4, pstS-Bam-P1, pst-Bam-P3, and pstS-Sal-P (Table 1). The PCRs were carried out with AccuTherm DNA polymerase (GeneCraft GmbH, Lüdinghausen, Germany) with chromosomal DNA of C. acetobutylicum ATCC 824 as the template. PCR products were purified with a Nucleospin Extract II kit (Macherey-Nagel GmbH & Co. KG, Düren, Germany) and 3' digoxigenin (DIG) labeled using a DIG gel shift kit, second generation (Roche Applied Science, Mannheim, Germany), following the manufacturer's instructions. Labeled promoter fragments were incubated for 15 to 30 min at room temperature with 1.5 to 5 µM MBP-*PhoR and/or 1 to 25 µM PhoP Strep-Tag in the absence or presence of 5 to 7.5 mM ATP and binding buffer, poly-L-lysine, and poly[d(I-C)] provided with the DIG gel shift kit. Gel shift reactions were applied to 6% (wt/vol) native polyacrylamide gels with 0.5x Tris-borate-EDTA buffer (44.5 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 44.5 mM boric acid, 5 mM EDTA) as the running buffer. Electrophoreses were run for 1.5 to 2.5 h at 80 V at room temperature. DNA blotting on nylon membranes (Nytran SuPerCharge nylon transfer membrane, 0.45-µm pore size; Schleicher & Schuell Bioscience GmbH, Dassel, Germany) and DIG detection were performed as described previously (32).
|
|
|---|
|
View larger version (9K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Gene architecture and localization of the phoPR operon of C. acetobutylicum. Numbers above the black line indicate the localization of the gene region on the chromosome. Arrows symbolize the orientation of transcription of the annotated open reading frames on the chromosome of C. acetobutylicum, and known gene names are given below in boldface letters.
|
![]() View larger version (74K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. PhoR proteins (A) and PhoP proteins (B) of E. coli (Ec), B. subtilis (Bs), and C. acetobutylicum (Ca). Schemes with the domain architectures of the polypeptides are presented at the tops of panels A and B. TM, transmembrane domain; HiskA, histidine kinase A dimerization/phosphoacceptor domain. Below the schemes, alignments of selected protein regions (I to IV in the case of PhoP and the N and C termini in the case of PhoR) are shown. Letters represent the amino acid residues, gray boxes highlight homologous or identical residues (accepted as homologous substitutions are A and G; R and K; F and Y; S and T; D and E; N and Q; and I, L, V, and M), and asterisks indicate conserved phosphorylation sites.
|
Interestingly, the pst operon starts about 1.2 kb downstream of these two genes, at position 1853987. This operon comprises five genes encoding the components of a high-affinity phosphate uptake system (Pst) and a PhoU-like protein. It is the only known phosphate-regulated operon in C. acetobutylicum so far (14). Only three short open reading frames, cac1702, cac1703, and cac1704, are located in between the two operons (Fig. 1). The deduced polypeptides encoded by cac1702 (126 aa) and cac1704 (71 aa) show no significant similarities to known proteins, while the 116-aa polypeptide encoded by cac1703 is listed as a methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein (fragment) in the annotated NCBI database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/).
Expression analysis of the phoPR gene locus of C. acetobutylicum. To evaluate whether the transcription of phoPR is restricted to phosphate depletion, Northern blotting and RT-PCR experiments were carried out. Thus, after a Pi pulse of 10 mM KH2PO4, cell aliquots were harvested and total RNA was isolated. Samples represented the decreasing phosphate concentrations due to the Pi consumption by the bacteria and the dilution rate. Northern blots with DIG-labeled DNA or even RNA probes against phoP or phoR did not reveal specific signals even if up to 20 µg total RNA was applied per lane (data not shown). However, RT-PCR experiments clearly revealed low basal transcript levels of phoP and phoR under conditions of phosphate excess in the culture supernatant. Going along with the decrease in phosphate levels, the first marginal increase of phoP and phoR mRNA transcripts was detected when the external Pi dropped below 0.7 mM. A strong, at least threefold increase of phoPR-specific transcripts was found below concentrations of 0.3 mM Pi in the cell-free supernatant as shown in Fig. 3.
![]() View larger version (69K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Transcription of the phoPR operon of C. acetobutylicum in response to phosphate depletion. Individual RT-PCR analyses of genes phoP, phoR, and ptb with total RNA of cells after a phosphate pulse are shown. External phosphate concentrations are given below the lanes (0 mM Pi symbolizes steady-state conditions). The ptb gene encoding phosphotransbutyrylase, which is expected to be constitutively expressed under experimental conditions, was used as the positive control. Bars represent relative signal intensity (rel. intensity), and the maximum signal intensity was set as 100%.
|
![]() View larger version (29K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Expression of PhoP under different phosphate concentrations. (A) Shown are sections of 2-DE gels with PhoP proteins with a surplus of Pi (6.7 mM) or Pi limitation (0 mM). The lines mark the spots of PhoP. The other spots serve orientation purposes (9309, dihydrodipicolinate reductase [dapB, cac2379]; 9317, acetoacetate decarboxylase [adc, cap0165]; 9324, triosephosphate isomerase [tpi, cac0711]; 9344, adenylate kinase [adk, cac3112]; 9318, not identified [score below 65]). (B) Distribution of normalized spot volumes (arbitrary units [a.u.]; n = 3) for PhoP (see Fig. 4A) are shown as box-and-whisker plots. The boxes represent the upper and lower quartiles. The separation line in the box marks the 50% value (mean; not visible). The whiskers indicate the 5th and 95th percentiles, respectively. Average values are depicted as little triangles. Upper and lower extreme values are indicated with a minus sign. The x symbol shows the 99% and 1% range of the individual values, respectively.
|
For determination of the transcription start point of phoP, primer extension analyses were performed and at least three different signals (PE1, PE2, and PE3) were obtained (Fig. 5A), located 147 nt (PE1), 156 nt, and 453 nt upstream of the phoP start codon (Fig. 5B). Thus, three possible 5' ends of the mRNA must be assumed.
![]() View larger version (57K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Transcription start points of phoP of C. acetobutylicum. The products of primer extension reactions using IRD800-labeled oligonucleotides were run on polyacrylamide gels alongside the corresponding sequencing reactions (T, G, C, A) generated with the same primer (A). (B) Locations of the identified transcription start points, PE1 (primer, phoP-neu-PE2), PE2 (phoP-neu-PE3), and PE3 (phoP-neu-PE3) are highlighted (gray circles) within the DNA sequence of the promoter region upstream of the phoP gene. The boldface ATG symbolizes the start codon of the phoP gene, and the arrow indicates its orientation; its dedicated ribosome binding site is underlined. Putative regulatory transcriptional elements of the transcription start points are boxed with a –10 or –35 (see text for details). Numbers in parentheses indicate their assignment to the corresponding transcription start points. Broken lines appear above possible regulatory repeats.
|
![]() View larger version (26K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Purification of heterologously expressed PhoP Strep-Tag (A) and MBP-*PhoR (B). Coomassie-stained SDS-PAGE (12.5%). M, protein molecular weight marker; W, washing fractions; E, elution fractions.
|
The recombinant proteins PhoP Strep-Tag and MBP-*PhoR were used to affirm in vitro characteristic biochemical features of two-component systems for PhoPR of C. acetobutylicum. Phosphorylation assays revealed a strong autophosphorylation of MBP-*PhoR in the presence of [
-32P]ATP (Fig. 7), whereas autophosphorylation of Strep-Tag-PhoP could not be detected (data not shown). Furthermore, when MBP-*PhoR and Strep-Tag-PhoP were incubated together under the same conditions, phosphate transfer from phosphorylated MBP-*PhoR to Strep-Tag-PhoP could be detected. In the presence of Strep-Tag-PhoP, the autophosphorylation signal of MBP-*PhoR almost completely disappeared, and instead, a second signal referring to phosphorylated Strep-Tag-PhoP appeared (Fig. 7).
![]() View larger version (37K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Autophosphorylation of MBP-*PhoR and phosphate transfer to PhoP Strep-Tag. Ten µCi of [ -32P]ATP was incubated with 2 µM MBP-*PhoR (lane 1) or with 2 µM MBP-*PhoR and 17 µM Strep-Tag-PhoP (lane 2) for 15 min at room temperature and was separated by SDS-PAGE (12.5%). Shown is an autoradiogram; relative signal intensities referring to the certain proteins are given below the lanes.
|
![]() View larger version (68K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 8. Binding of PhoP to the pst promoter. Electromobility shift assays were carried out with 0.5 ng 3' DIG-labeled pst promoter fragment P3 (A), fragment P1 (B), and fragment P4 (C) in the presence of 5 mM ATP. Fragments were incubated without protein (lane 1), with 5 µM Strep-Tag-PhoP (lane 2), with 5 µM Strep-Tag-PhoP and 1.5 µM MBP-*PhoR (lane 3), or with 5 µM Strep-Tag-PhoP, 1.5 µM MBP-*PhoR, and 100 ng unlabeled fragment. (D) As negative controls, unspecific DIG-labeled DNA fragments were incubated under the same conditions without protein (lane 1) and with 5 µM Strep-Tag-PhoP and 1.5 µM MBP-*PhoR (lane 2). Additionally DIG-labeled fragment P3 was incubated without protein (lane 3) and with 3 µM MBP-*PhoR (lane 4).
|
|
|
|---|
For clostridia, almost nothing is known aside from in silico alignment data, which led to annotations of putative PhoPR two-component systems in the sequenced genomes of Clostridium tetani and Clostridium perfringens (13). Interestingly, even within this group of bacteria, genetic organizations differ and seem not to be highly conserved. For example, in C. acetobutylicum, the phoPR operon is separated from the pst operon by three short, seemingly unrelated open reading frames (Fig. 1), whereas in C. tetani E88, the putative phoPR operon directly precedes the pst operon. A different architecture is postulated for C. perfringens, where the phoR gene product is predicted as an orphan sensor histidine kinase which is located far from the pst operon on the opposite strand (13).
Although they are referred to as phosphate-dependent regulatory systems, none of the clostridial PhoPR systems has been characterized in detail so far. Since we had started to analyze molecular aspects of Pi depletion in C. acetobutylicum (14), an obvious step was to focus on the search for a PhoPR system in this bacterium. As shown here, based on similarity searches, the most likely candidates are the gene products of the chromosomal open reading frames cac1700 and cac1701, which were named PhoP and PhoR, respectively.
Indirect evidence for the involvement of PhoP and PhoR in processes restricted to phosphate limitation arises from the fact that a specific induction of the transcription of these genes is coupled to the drop in external Pi concentration to below 0.3 mM. Obviously, this behavior corresponds with the induction of the pst operon, which is expected to encode a high-affinity phosphate-specific ABC transport system in C. acetobutylicum (14). Here, under phosphate limitation, we demonstrate a clear increase in the phoP and phoR mRNA levels. A nearly directly proportional, 2.5-fold-higher PhoP protein level was detected for 2-DE gels. These findings prove a specific need for PhoP under phosphate limitation and, in combination with the in silico alignment data, support its proposed function as a key regulator of the phosphate starvation response in C. acetobutylicum.
Interestingly, PhoP proteins derived from cultures grown with Pi limitation migrated to different locations, indicating at least slightly modified proteins. A similar behavior is not known for PhoP proteins of other organisms so far. The reason for this behavior remains speculative, as by means of MALDI-TOF MS, neither a phosphorylation of the protein nor an elongation of the N-terminal peptide was seen (data not shown). Actually, we cannot exclude the possibility that the different mRNA molecules discussed below might yield different N termini of the respective proteins, resulting in the migration differences shown in the 2-DE gels. It might be important to note that no other protein spot in these 2-DE gels was identified as PhoP.
For B. subtilis,
A-driven transcription of the phoPR operon starts at two different promoters (43) and, additionally,
E- and
B-dependent separate promoters exist, resulting in at least four different mRNA 5' ends (42). Our primer extension results also indicate multiple transcription start points which might suggest a similar situation for C. acetobutylicum. Possible –10 and –35 promoter sequences only weakly match the consensus sequences (Fig. 5A). An involvement of different sigma factors as described for B. subtilis seems likely not only because of the close relatedness of these bacteria. The sequence 5'-ATG-N18-AATGCAT-3' can be found 6 nt upstream of the PE2 signal (Fig. 5A). This element resembles the consensus –10 and –35 sequences for
E-dependent transcription (ATA-N16-18-CATAcaT) of B. subtilis (18) and the described
E promoter of the phoPR operon of B. subtilis (ATG-N17-CATAAAAT) (42). Thus, a
E-dependent transcription might be speculated for phoPR starting at the PE2 signal. Possible promoter elements for both of the other transcription start points at PE1 and PE3 (Fig. 5A) show only small similarities to the consensus TTGACA (–35) and TATAAT (–10) sequences for
A-dependent transcription (52) and none to the postulated Pho boxes in C. acetobutylicum (14). But another 6-bp element, separated by 4 to 6 bp, is repeated four times within the region upstream of the PE1 and PE2 signals (TXT/AGAT). However, the significance of these elements remains unclear.
Although we were not able to show an operon structure of phoPR experimentally because Northern blot experiments did not reveal specific signals, we are convinced that a monocistronic transcription of phoR is unlikely. The stop codon of the annotated phoP gene and the start codon of annotated phoR gene are separated by 1 nt only, and no putative Shine-Dalgarno sequences are located in the upstream region of the phoR gene. These facts may indicate a translational coupling as has been described for several other two-component systems (17, 22, 34, 54, 57). In this context, the possibility of different initiation sites of translation of PhoR has to be discussed. Within the same reading frame, two GTG codons are located two and three codons upstream of the annotated start codon of phoR, probably representing alternative initiation translation sites (data not shown). In consequence, translation overlaps with the end of phoP, and the resulting proteins would show N-terminal extensions of 3 or 4 aa.
The crucial features of a two-component system in their domain architecture for the deduced gene products PhoP and PhoR were demonstrated. The autophosphorylation of PhoR in the presence of ATP as well as the phosphate transfer to PhoP confirmed these characteristics. PhoP of C. acetobutylicum was able to bind to the promoter region of the pst operon in the absence and presence of ATP. A similar situation was found for B. subtilis, where the binding affinity of PhoP
P to Pho box promoters is not significantly higher than that of PhoP, but transcription is affected only by PhoP
P, not by PhoP (43). The specific binding of PhoP to the promoter region of the phosphate-dependent transcribed pst operon (14) indicates a role of the PhoPR two-component system as a regulator in the phosphate limitation response of C. acetobutylicum. Further work has to focus on the characterization of the specific function of the putative Pho box motifs.
For B. subtilis, a cross-link between the PhoPR regulatory system and sporulation was shown (1). The possibility of a similar cross-regulatory mechanism in C. acetobutylicum would fit with the finding that phosphate limitation seems to be involved in sporulation and solvent production in this bacterium (7). Nevertheless, the involvement of further regulatory mechanisms remains speculative.
This work was supported in part by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) and by fellowships of the Graduiertenförderung of the federal state of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern to T.F. and M.M.
Published ahead of print on 8 August 2008. ![]()
Present address: University of Rostock, Medical Faculty, Institute of Med. Microbiology, Virology and Hygiene, Schillingallee 70, D-18057 Rostock, Germany. ![]()
Present address: University of Rostock, Institute of Chemistry, Divison of Analytical, Technical and Environmental Chemistry, Dr.-Lorenz-Weg 1, D-18051 Rostock, Germany. ![]()
Present address: Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH, Frankfurt Biotechnology, Industriepark Höchst, Building D710, D-65926 Frankfurt am Main, Germany. ![]()
|
|
|---|
A- and repression of the E
E-responsive phoB-PS+V promoters during Pho response. J. Bacteriol. 187:5166-5178.
an, M., S. Schaffer, T. Ishige, U. Sorger-Herrmann, V. F. Wendisch, and M. Bott. 2006. Two-component systems of Corynebacterium glutamicum: deletion analysis and involvement of the PhoS-PhoR system in the phosphate starvation response. J. Bacteriol. 188:724-732.
P. J. Bacteriol. 180:753-758.
A- and E
E-responsive promoters by phosphorylated PhoP. J. Bacteriol. 186:4262-4275.
P in transcriptional regulation of genes involved in cell wall anionic polymer biosynthesis in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 180:4007-4010.
factors, p. 607-629. In P. Dürre (ed.), Handbook on clostridia. CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»