Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, November 2008, p. 7584-7590, Vol. 190, No. 22
0021-9193/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JB.00856-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
,
Instituto de Bioquímica Vegetal y Fotosíntesis, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas and Universidad de Sevilla, E-41092 Seville, Spain
Received 23 June 2008/ Accepted 8 September 2008
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The ntcA gene is transcribed from a complex promoter that produces three transcriptional start points (TSPs) (13, 16, 18) (see the sequence of the promoter region in Fig. 3B). Promoters P1, P2, and P3 produce TSPs at positions –49, –136, and –180, respectively, with respect to the translational start of ntcA. P2 functions independently of the nitrogen source, whereas P1 functions in the presence of combined nitrogen, but its use transiently increases after 6 to 12 h of nitrogen deprivation in an NtcA- and HetR-dependent manner (13). Finally, P3 functions only in the absence of combined nitrogen and its use is transiently induced after 6 to 12 h of nitrogen deprivation in an NtcA- and HetR-dependent manner (13). The promoter of the ntcA gene contains two putative NtcA-binding sites separated by 40 nucleotides and centered at positions –143.5 (GTAN8AAC) and –103.5 (GTAN8TAC) with respect to the translational start of ntcA. (We will refer to them as "distal" and "proximal," respectively, according to their position with respect to the ntcA open reading frame.) The distal site overlaps the –10 hexamer of the P2 promoter (13). In vitro binding of NtcA to the distal site, but not to the proximal site, has been demonstrated by DNase I protection footprinting assays (18). However, two retarded bands have been observed in electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs) with NtcA and a fragment from the ntcA promoter (10). In this study, we used a combination of in vivo and in vitro approaches in order to understand the operation of the complex Anabaena ntcA promoter region, which is functional in the two different cell types, vegetative cells and heterocysts, of a nitrogen-fixing filament.
![]() View larger version (48K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Sequences of the ntcA promoter region protected by NtcA in the presence of 2-oxoglutarate. Arrows labeled –49, –136, and –180 indicate the position and direction of TSPs corresponding to P1, P2, and P3, respectively. (A) DNase I protection footprint assays carried out with purified NtcA and wild-type and mutated versions of the ntcA promoter region. The fragments were amplified by PCR using oligonucleotides NA8 (32P labeled) and NA14 (unlabeled). Assay mixtures contained 2.5 fmol of labeled fragment and 0.068, 0.137, 0.274, or 0.412 µM of purified NtcA in the presence of 0.6 mM 2-oxoglutarate. Windows of protection due to NtcA binding (vertical lines), positions protected in all four fragments (solid triangles), and positions altered in the presence of NtcA in fragments containing a mutated proximal site (open triangles) are indicated. Thick vertical lines indicate regions protected in the presence of every NtcA concentration tested. Thin vertical lines indicate that mutation of the distal site did not completely eliminate protection of the sequence corresponding to that site. The positions of NtcA-binding sites (striped boxes) are also indicated on the left. Asterisks denote a position hypersensitive to DNase I digestion as referred to in the text. (B) Sequence of the ntcA promoter, from position –253 to the translational start of the ntcA gene (ATG). Triplets corresponding to the NtcA-binding sites are indicated in boldface. The positions around the NtcA-binding sites protected in both strands of the wild-type fragment are indicated with horizontal lines above or below the sequence. Putative –10 and –35 determinants are indicated with gray boxes. Solid triangles point to positions protected in all four fragments. The positions of TSPs for P1, P2, and P3 are underlined.
|
Binding of NtcA to wild-type and mutated versions of the ntcA promoter.
As a first step to understand the role of the two putative NtcA-binding sites present in the promoter region of the ntcA gene, we prepared modified versions of this region bearing mutations in one or both sites, and carried out EMSA with purified NtcA protein following procedures previously described (11). Three mutated versions of the ntcA upstream region (positions –603 to +18 with respect to the translational start of ntcA) were generated, with changes in the sequence of the proximal (GTAN8TAC
CATN8TAC), distal (GTAN8AAC
CATN8AAC), or both NtcA-binding sites. As previously observed (10), binding of NtcA to a wild-type fragment produced two retarded bands that likely correspond to binding of NtcA to one (lower retarded band) or both (upper retarded band) binding sites (Fig. 1A). Mutation of the proximal site resulted, as expected, in the absence of the upper retarded band that likely corresponds to binding of NtcA to two sites (Fig. 1B). However, mutation of the distal site did not abolish binding of NtcA to this site, since the upper retarded band was still observed, although at higher NtcA concentrations than in the case of the wild-type fragment (compare Fig. 1A and C). Consistently, NtcA was still able to bind to the fragment containing mutations in both NtcA-binding sites (Fig. 1D). The presence of faint bands appearing when a high concentration of NtcA was used (Fig. 1A, B, and C) suggests low-affinity binding of NtcA to additional positions. In fact, imperfect NtcA-binding sites are present in the DNA fragment used, just upstream from positions –180 (GTAN8TAT) and –49 (GTAN8TAA) (Fig. 3B). However, because mutation of the distal site did not abolish NtcA binding to that site (see above), the retarded band shown in Fig. 1D (fragment with both sites mutated) could result from binding of NtcA to the mutated distal site.
![]() View larger version (37K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Binding of purified NtcA to wild-type and mutated versions of the ntcA promoter region. EMSA was carried out with a wild-type fragment (A) or with fragments bearing mutations in the proximal (B), distal (C), or both (D) NtcA-binding sites. A scheme of the fragment used in each case, including the positions of TSPs –180, –136, and –49, together with the sequences of wild-type and mutated NtcA-binding sites present in each fragment, is shown in panels A through D. Mutations introduced in each fragment are shown in gray under the wild-type sequence. The positions of free DNA fragments (open triangles), retarded bands (black triangles), and faint bands appearing when a high concentration of NtcA was used (asterisks), as referred to in the text, are indicated. Assay mixtures contained 0.1 fmol of labeled DNA fragment.
|
Parallel mobility shift assays were carried out in the absence or presence of 0.6 mM 2-oxoglutarate in order to test the responsiveness of NtcA binding to this effector (24) (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). The amount of fragment in retarded complexes corresponding to binding to only one NtcA-binding site was quantified in assays carried out with fragments mutated in the proximal (see Fig. S1B in the supplemental material) or distal (see Fig. S1C in the supplemental material) NtcA-binding site. The results shown in Fig. 2 indicate that binding to both sites was positively influenced by 2-oxoglutarate. Although NtcA alone showed higher affinity for the distal than for the proximal site, affinity appeared to be slightly higher for the proximal than for the distal site in the presence of 2-oxoglutarate. It is worth noting that the distal site (GTAN8AAC) does not exactly match the consensus for NtcA-binding sites (GTAN8TAC). However, the presence of nucleotides C and A in the second and third positions of the 8-nucleotide spacing between triplets (underlined in Fig. 1) most likely contributes to NtcA binding to this site (7, 23).
![]() View larger version (11K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Effect of 2-oxoglutarate on binding of NtcA to DNA fragments containing the ntcA promoter region bearing mutations in the proximal (A) or distal (B) NtcA-binding sites. The percentage of fragment retarded (one band in panel A and two bands in panel B) in parallel assays carried out in the absence (open circles) or presence (closed circles) of 2-oxoglutarate (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material) is represented with respect to the NtcA concentration in the assays.
|
To determine the DNA sequences interacting with NtcA in wild-type and mutant versions of the ntcA promoter, binding of NtcA in the presence of 2-oxoglutarate was also analyzed by DNase I protection footprinting assays carried out as described previously (22) (Fig. 3 and see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material). The DNA fragments used were PCR amplified with oligonucleotides NA8 and NA14 and plasmid pCSEL18 (wild-type promoter), pCSEL35 (proximal site mutated), pCSEL44 (distal site mutated), or pCSEL47 (both sites mutated) as a template. One of the two oligonucleotides used for the PCRs was end labeled with [
-32P]dATP and polynucleotide kinase. Oligonucleotide NA8 was labeled in the experiment shown in Fig. 3A, whereas oligonucleotide NA14 was labeled in the experiment shown in Fig. S2 in the supplemental material. Two regions (far-left panel in Fig. 3A), each corresponding to one NtcA-binding site, were protected in the wild-type fragment in the presence of every NtcA concentration tested. The area protected by NtcA around the distal site included the –10 determinant for the P2 promoter, as well as the position corresponding to TSP2 (–136) (Fig. 3B). Mutation of the proximal site eliminated protection of the corresponding sequences (second and far right panels in Fig. 3A). Mutation of the distal site did not completely eliminate protection of sequences corresponding to that site (third and far right panels in Fig. 3A), thus indicating that NtcA could still bind to those positions, although a larger amount of NtcA was required in order to see a window of protection. This observation is consistent with the fact that retarded bands that might be due to NtcA binding to the distal site were observed in EMSA with fragments bearing mutations in such a site (Fig. 1).
Binding of NtcA in vitro to either site did not seem to rely on binding to the other site, although cooperative effects cannot be excluded in vivo. Interestingly, binding of NtcA modified the pattern of DNase I digestion in the area corresponding to the proximal binding site, even when that site was mutated (either alone or in combination with a mutation of the distal site) (Fig. 3A and see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material). This modification could be due to conformational changes induced by binding of NtcA to other positions, including the distal site. Binding of NtcA to the distal (Fig. 3A) or the proximal (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material) site produced a band hypersensitive to DNase I digestion, corresponding to the T of the GTA triplet (Fig. 3A and see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material). Such hypersensitivity, also observed in the case of NtcA binding to the glnA and rbcL promoters (17), indicates that NtcA binding, similar to CRP binding (20), might produce conformational changes in the DNA backbone. Additional subtle changes that would correspond to partial protection of sequences located upstream from the distal NtcA-binding site (around TSP3) (Fig. 3A) and downstream from the proximal NtcA binding site (upstream of TSP1) (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material) were observed with all four DNA fragments used in footprinting experiments. Sequences protected by NtcA binding in both strands are summarized in Fig. 3B.
In vivo operation of mutated versions of the ntcA promoter.
We have previously analyzed the expression of an ntcA-gfp translational fusion from the wild type and shortened versions of the ntcA promoter (16). Our previous results indicate that (i) there is a certain level of operation of P1 in the absence of NtcA in all cells of the filament (13); (ii) in the absence of P3, the fragment covering positions –143 to –182 exerts a negative effect on expression of P1 (16); and (iii) P1 alone appears capable of driving localized induction of ntcA in differentiating cells in the absence of the fragment from positions –143 to –182, but in its presence, localized expression of P1 in proheterocysts requires P3 (strain CSEL7) (16). We have now prepared constructs in which the ntcA-gfp translational fusion is expressed from modified versions of the ntcA promoter (PntcA-gfp). In order to preserve any autoregulatory effect of NtcA, all of the PntcA-gfp constructs were integrated, through homologous recombination, in the nucA-nuiA region of the
megaplasmid of Anabaena sp. strain PCC 7120, so that expression of the ntcA gene in the chromosome remained unaltered. Constructs bearing translational fusions of the mutated versions of the ntcA promoter with the gfp gene (GFP-mut2) were prepared as described by Olmedo-Verd et al. (16; see the supplemental material for details). Strains CSEL10, CSEL11, and CSEL12 contained the gfp gene fused to mutated versions of the ntcA promoter, including mutations in the proximal, distal, or both NtcA-binding sites, respectively. Strain CSEL6 bearing the wild-type version of the ntcA promoter translationally fused to gfp (16) was used as a control.
Ammonium-grown filaments were subjected to nitrogen deprivation, and expression of GFP was analyzed by means of fluorescence imaging and primer extension. GFP fluorescence in strains carrying different versions of the PntcA-gfp fusion is shown in Fig. 4. Mutations eliminating NtcA binding to the proximal site (strain CSEL10) or reducing NtcA binding to the distal site (strain CSEL11) did not abolish localized increase of GFP fluorescence. However, mutation of both NtcA-binding sites resulted in low, nonlocalized expression of the fusion (strain CSEL12).
![]() View larger version (15K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. GFP fluorescence of strains carrying the PntcA-gfp fusions integrated in the nucA-nuiA genomic region of the Anabaena megaplasmid. GFP fluorescence micrographs of ammonium-grown filaments (panels labeled 0 h) or ammonium-grown filaments incubated for 6, 10 or 24 h in a medium lacking combined nitrogen are shown for the indicated CSEL strains. The NtcA-binding site or sites mutated in each strain are indicated.
|
megaplasmid, so that expression of the ntcA gene and levels of the NtcA protein remain unaltered with respect to those of the wild-type strain.
![]() View larger version (42K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Primer extension analysis of the expression of the PntcA-gfp fusion in strains CSEL6, CSEL10, CSEL11, and CSEL12. Primer extension was carried out with primer GFP4 and RNA isolated from filaments grown with ammonium (lanes labeled 0) or from filaments grown with ammonium, washed, and incubated for 6, 12, or 24 h in the absence of combined nitrogen. The positions of TSPs –49, –136, and –180, which were generated from promoters P1, P2, and P3, respectively, are indicated. The results shown in panels A and B correspond to two different step-down experiments.
|
This work was supported by grants BFU2004-00872 and BFU2007-60457 from the Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia, Spain.
Published ahead of print on 19 September 2008. ![]()
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://jb.asm.org/. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»