Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Bacteriology, December 2008, p. 8126-8136, Vol. 190, No. 24
0021-9193/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JB.01035-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Loss of RNase R Induces Competence Development in Legionella pneumophila
,
Xavier Charpentier,1
Sébastien P. Faucher,1
Sergey Kalachikov,2 and
Howard A. Shuman1*
Department of Microbiology, Columbia University Medical Center, 701 West 168th Street, New York, New York 10032,1
Columbia Genome Center, 1150 St Nicholas Avenue, New York, New York 100322
Received 25 July 2008/
Accepted 29 September 2008

ABSTRACT
RNase R is a processive 3'-5' exoribonuclease with a high degree
of conservation in prokaryotes. Although some bacteria possess
additional hydrolytic 3'-5' exoribonucleases such as RNase II,
RNase R was found to be the only predicted one in the facultative
intracellular pathogen
Legionella pneumophila. This provided
a unique opportunity to study the role of RNase R in the absence
of an additional RNase with similar enzymatic activity. We investigated
the role of RNase R in the biology of
Legionella pneumophila under various conditions and performed gene expression profiling
using microarrays. At optimal growth temperature, the loss of
RNase R had no major consequence on bacterial growth and had
a moderate impact on normal gene regulation. However, at a lower
temperature, the loss of RNase R had a significant impact on
bacterial growth and resulted in the accumulation of structured
RNA degradation products. Concurrently, gene regulation was
affected and specifically resulted in an increased expression
of the competence regulon. Loss of the exoribonuclease activity
of RNase R was sufficient to induce competence development,
a genetically programmed process normally triggered as a response
to environmental stimuli. The temperature-dependent expression
of competence genes in the
rnr mutant was found to be independent
of previously identified competence regulators in
Legionella pneumophila. We suggest that a physiological role of RNase R
is to eliminate structured RNA molecules that are stabilized
by low temperature, which in turn may affect regulatory networks,
compromising adaptation to cold and thus resulting in decreased
viability.

INTRODUCTION
RNA molecules provide the dynamic link between DNA-encoded information
and protein synthesis. The unstable, labile nature of RNA is
critical, as it allows a rapid adjustment of specific protein
expression levels in response to environmental changes. In bacteria,
RNA degradation occurs through an initial endoribonuclease cleavage
followed by 3'-5' exoribonuclease digestion (
6,
14). In
Escherichia coli, the latter reaction involves three processive 3'-5' exoribonucleases:
PNPase, RNase R, and RNase II. PNPase is a phosphorolytic enzyme
and part of the degradosome, a multiprotein complex also involving
the RNA helicase RhlB, an enolase, and the endoribonuclease
RNase E (
27). RNase II and RNase R are hydrolytic exoribonucleases
that share similar domain architectures and belong to the RNase
II family of RNases (
18,
23,
38). In contrast to RNase II, RNase
R is able to degrade structured RNA in vitro without the aid
of helicase activity (
11) and leads to 2nt as the end product
(
1,
11). However, the in vivo function of RNase R is poorly
understood. The enzyme has been reported to play a role in rRNA
quality control and the decay of mRNA fragments with extensive
secondary structures (
10,
12). RNase R is emerging as an important
component in adaptation to stress. In the ribosome rescue system,
RNase R associates with SmpB and the tmRNA (
21) and participates
in the degradation of the mRNA on which tmRNA-dependent ribosome
rescue occurs (
29). RNase R also participates in the maturation
of the tmRNA itself in
Escherichia coli (
5), as well as its
processing in
Caulobacter crescentus and
Pseudomonas syringae (
19,
26). In
E. coli, RNase R is induced twofold in stationary
phase (
2), and the elevation of RNase R activity in response
to cold shock suggested a role of RNase R in adaptation to decreased
temperatures (
5,
7). The absence of RNase R caused impaired
growth at low temperature (
5). Consistent with the notion of
the involvement of RNase in the degradation of RNA being stabilized
by low temperature, RNase R has been found as part of the degradosome
in the cold-adapted strain
Pseudomonas syringae Lz4W (
25). RNase
R is also essential for growth at low temperatures for
Pseudomonas syringae,
Pseudomonas putida, and
Aeromonas hydrophila (
16,
17,
26). In the reduced-genome intracellular pathogen
Mycoplasma genitalium, RNase R appears to be the only exoribonuclease (
22)
and is also thought to be essential, since the gene could not
be interrupted (
20). Studies of RNase R in additional species
may result in a better understanding of its role in RNA metabolism.
Unlike most members of the gammaproteobacterium class, the facultative
intracellular pathogen
Legionella pneumophila had only one hydrolytic
RNase predicted, and by sequence comparison it resembled RNase
R. Accordingly, we presumed it was an RNase R-like enzyme. Thus,
L. pneumophila may provide another opportunity to study the
function of RNase R in the absence of the enzymatically related
RNase II.
We report here the characterization of an RNase R mutant of L. pneumophila. We found that RNase R is not essential for the growth of L. pneumophila at optimal temperature as a free-living bacterium or as an intracellular pathogen of mammalian and protozoan host cells. However, the absence of RNase R caused impaired growth at low temperatures that was associated with an accumulation of unprocessed RNA and perturbations of gene regulation. In particular, the lack of the exoribonuclease activity of RNase R at 30°C resulted in derepression of the competence regulon independently of the previously described competence regulators comR and proQ (34). We suggest a role of RNase R in the disposal of RNA molecules stabilized by low temperatures which otherwise would have deleterious impacts on gene regulatory networks.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Strains and plasmids constructions.
L. pneumophila strains used in this study are derivatives of
the strain JR32, a restriction-deficient and streptomycin-resistant
derivative of the Philadelphia-1 isolate (
32).
L. pneumophila strains were grown in liquid medium ACES [
N-(2-acetamido)-2-aminoethanesulfonic
acid]-buffered yeast extract (AYE) or on solid-medium ACES-buffered
charcoal yeast extract (CYE) plates. Chloramphenicol, kanamycin,
gentamicin, and hygromycin were used, respectively, at 5 µg/ml,
10 µg/ml, 50 µg/ml, and 100 µg/ml. Mutants
with deletions of
comEA and
comEC derived from the
rnr mutant
LELA559C were generated by natural transformation with PCR products
made of a kanamycin resistance cassette and the flanking regions
(1 kb each) of the gene to be deleted. The PCR products were
synthesized by long-flanking-homology PCR (
24). The replacement
of resistance markers of Tn
903dII
lacZ in competent mutants was
obtained by natural transformation with plasmid pXDC44, pXDC46,
or pXDC57 and the selection of the corresponding marker. Plasmids
pXDC44, pXDC46, and pXDC57 were made by cloning a PCR product
of Tn
903dII
lacZ into pGEM-T Easy (Promega Corporation, Madison,
WI), creating pGEM-Tn
903. The replacement cassettes conferring
resistance to chloramphenicol, gentamicin, and hygromycin were
amplified by PCR and cloned into EcoRV and SmaI sites of pGEM-Tn
903.
Plasmid pXDC18 is a pMMB207C derivative on which the chloramphenicol
resistance cassette was removed by digesting with DraI and was
replaced with a gentamicin resistance cassette obtained by PCR
from pJN105. Plasmids for complementation of
rnr,
comEA, and
comEC were obtained by cloning the corresponding genes under
the control of P
tac in the polylinker of pMMB207C or pXDC18.
JR32 strains harboring the
comEA-lacZ fusions in the chromosome
were constructed by allelic exchange using pLAW344 (
33). The
comEA regions (1 kb) to be fused to
lacZ, a 1-kb region downstream
of
comEA, and a
lacZ-aptII cassette were amplified by PCR. The
three PCR products were assembled (
comEA::
lacZ-aptII-downstream
comEA) by fusion PCR using the Phusion DNA polymerase (Finnzymes),
and the PCR product was cloned into pLAW344. The resulting plasmids
was transformed in JR32, and kanamycin-resistant and chloramphenicol-resistant
colonies were selected. Transformants were then counterselected
on CYE plates with kanamycin and 3% sucrose. Genomic DNA was
extracted from the JR32 strains harboring the
comEA-lacZ fusions
and used to transform the
rnr mutant LELA559G.
Axenic growth and determination of doubling time.
Bacterial strains were grown overnight in 3 ml of AYE broth on a rotary shaker. The next morning, stationary cultures were diluted 1:50 in prewarmed media and grown to mid-exponential phase (optical density [OD] = 0.5 to 0.7). Cultures were then diluted to an initial OD of 0.1, 0.05, or 0.025 in 100 µl in a 96-well plate and placed inside a temperature-controlled plate reader. The plate was submitted to intermittent shaking (100 rpm, 60 s every 5 min), and growth was monitored by measuring absorbance at 600 nm every 10 min. Doubling times were determined from the exponential sections of the growth curves.
Intracellular growth in THP-1-derived macrophages and Acanthamoeba castellanii.
THP-1 cells were routinely maintained in RPMI 1640, 2 mM glutamine, 10% fetal calf serum at 37°C under 5% CO2. For Legionella infection, THP-1 cells were incubated overnight in a 24-well microplate (1 x 106 cells/well) in medium containing 10 ng/ml phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA). After the overnight stimulation, cells were washed and allowed to stabilize in medium without PMA for 2 days. Cells were then infected with L. pneumophila from stationary AYE cultures at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 1:1,000 (bacteria per cell). Infections were synchronized by spinning the bacteria at 650 x g for 10 min onto the adhered host cells. The supernatant of each well was sampled every 24 h, and numbers of CFU were determined by spotting serial dilutions on CYE plates. A. castellanii (ATCC 30234) was grown as adherent cells in proteose peptone-yeast extract-glucose medium (PYG) medium at 30°C. For Legionella infection, A. castellanii cells were resuspended in PYG, seeded in a 24-well microplate (1 x 106 cells/well), and incubated at 30°C for 1 hour or until cells were adherent. The PYG was aspirated and the wells were washed twice with 1 ml of warm (30°C) acetyl (Ac) buffer. L. pneumophila, resuspended in Ac buffer, was added to the wells at a MOI of 1:1,000. Infections were synchronized by spinning the bacteria at 650 x g for 10 min onto the adhered host cells. The plate was incubated for 1 hour at 30°C, and then the Ac buffer was carefully aspirated and replaced with 1 ml of warm Ac buffer. The supernatant of each well was sampled every 24 h, and numbers of CFU were determined by spotting serial dilutions on CYE plates.
Microarray analysis.
The microarray consisted of 2,997 unique 70-mer oligonucleotides representing all predicted L. pneumophila open reading frames spotted in duplicate. Total RNA from bacteria grown on CYE plate as in a transformation experiment (see "Competence assay" below) was isolated using the RNeasy kit (Qiagen Inc, Valencia, CA). RNA samples (20 µg) were reverse transcribed with Superscript II Plus RNase H– reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), random primers, and a mixture of deoxynucleotide triphosphates containing aminoallyl-modified dUTP (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO). RNA templates were removed by alkaline hydrolysis and aminoallyl-cDNAs were purified using the QiaQuick PCR purification kit (Qiagen Inc, Valencia, CA) and coupled with Alexa Fluor 546 or 647 dyes (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). UV cross-linked slides were prehybridized in 5x SSC (1x SSC is 0.15 M NaCl plus 0.015 M sodium citrate), 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), and 0.1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin for 45 min at 37°C. Slides were then rinsed in 0.1x SSC and dried. Labeled cDNA was added to hybridization solution (40% formamide, 5x SSC, 0.1% SDS, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 1 mg/ml human placental DNA) and hybridized to microarrays in hybridization chambers (GraceBio Inc, Bend, OR) at 37°C overnight with rotation. Slides were washed twice with 5x SSC plus 0.1% SDS and 0.1x SSC plus 0.1% SDS, rinsed quickly with 0.01x SSC, and dried with high-pressure air by use of a dust remover. Slides were scanned at a 5-µm resolution using a ScanArray express microarray scanner (Perkin Elmer Inc, Wellesley, MA), and spot analysis was performed using Pro Scan Array Express software (Perkin Elmer Inc., Wellesley, MA). Raw signal intensities were corrected for dye labeling effects within and between all slides by use of normalize.lowess() R-function implemented in the Bioconductor affy microarray analysis package. The resulting gene expression data were analyzed using the Spotfire DecisionSite for Functional Genomics software suite (Spotfire).
RNA electrophoresis and Northern blot analysis.
Total RNA from about 109 bacteria grown on a CYE plate were extracted with 1 ml of Trizol reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Northern blots were performed using either a denaturing TBE-urea 6% acrylamide gel or a formaldehyde-1.5% agarose gel. One to 10 micrograms of total RNA in denaturing buffer was loaded per lane and run in TBE buffer (acrylamide gel) or MOPS (morpholinepropanesulfonic acid) buffer (agarose gel). RNAs were transferred to a nylon membrane (Immobilon-NY+; Millipore Corp., Billerica, MA) either by electrophoretic transfer in TBE buffer (acrylamide gel) or by capillary transfer in 10x SSC (agarose gel). RNAs were cross-linked to the membrane by UV irradiation. Membranes were hybridized at 42°C with 5'-biotinylated oligonucleotide probes (5 nM) in ULTRAhyb ultrasensitive hybridization buffer (Ambion, Austin, TX) and then washed according to the instructions of the ULTRAhyb manufacturer. Membranes were developed using horseradish peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin and enhanced luminol substrate (chemiluminescent nucleic acid detection module; Pierce, Rockford, IL) and Biomax films (Kodak).
Determination of the comEA mRNA half-life.
Wild-type JR32 and the rnr mutant (LELA559) from a CYE plate were inoculated in 30 ml of AYE broth at an OD of 0.05 and grown at 30°C to an OD of 0.7 to 0.8 (about 18 to 20 h of growth). Transcription was arrested by the addition of rifampin (100 µg/ml final), and aliquots of 1 ml were removed at 0, 5, 10, and 15 min after the addition of rifampin. The 1-ml aliquots were added to 500 µl of ice-cold AYE, the bacteria were pelleted by a 30-s centrifugation at 20,000 x g at 4°C, the medium was quickly aspirated, and the pellet was resuspended in 1 ml of Trizol (Invitrogen). Once all aliquots were collected, RNAs were extracted according to the manufacturer's instructions. Traces of genomic DNA were removed by a DNase I treatment, and RNAs were purified by acid phenol-chloroform extraction (5:1) at a pH of 4.5 and ethanol precipitation. RNAs (2 µg) were reverse transcribed and used as the template for real-time PCR with power SYBR green (Applied Biosystems). Data were analyzed with the 
CT method (where CT is the threshold cycle) using 16S rRNA as a reference. Amounts of mRNA were expressed relative to the amount at time zero (t = 0). Data were fit to a first-order exponential decay with the Qtiplot software.
Competence assay.
Competence assays on CYE plates were performed as described by Sexton and Vogel (34). Briefly, one colony was used to produce a circular patch of about 6 to 8 mm in diameter on a CYE plate. One microgram of genomic DNA, previously extracted from the gentamicin-resistant strain JC51 (9) or from the hygromycin-resistant strain KS79 dotB-hygro, was spotted onto the patch, and the plate was incubated for 2 days at 30°C or 37°C. The patch was then resuspended in 1 ml of sterile water, and serial dilutions were plated onto CYE plates with or without a selection agent. The transformation frequency represents the ratio of total CFU determined from plating on selective media by the total CFU determined from plating on nonselective media.
Beta-galactosidase assay.
Beta-galactosidase assays were performed on bacteria grown as described for the transformation assays. One colony was used to produce a circular patch of about 6 to 8 mm in diameter on a CYE plate. After 24 h of growth at 30°C or 37°C, the patch was resuspended in 10 ml of Z buffer and the bacterial suspension was assayed for beta-galactosidase activity as described previously (37).
Immunoblotting.
Proteins from SDS-polyacrylamide gels were electrophoretically transferred onto nitrocellulose sheets (Schleicher and Schuell). Sheets were analyzed by Western blotting with rabbit polyclonal antibody raised against E. coli RNase R (a gift from Murray Deutcher, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine) and an anti-rabbit peroxidase conjugate (Pierce) as the secondary antibody. Nitrocellulose sheets were revealed with a chemiluminescence detection system (Pierce) and Biomax films (Kodak).
Microarray data accession number.
The data discussed in this publication have been deposited in NCBI's Gene Expression Omnibus (15) and are accessible through GEO series accession number GSE12796 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE12796).

RESULTS
Identification and characterization of an L. pneumophila RNase R mutant.
We identified an
L. pneumophila rnr mutant from a collection
of Tn
903dII
lacZ insertions of the Philadelphia-1-derived laboratory
strain JR32 (
37). The Tn
903dII
lacZ insertion has been mapped
at nucleotide (nt) 513 of the RNase R coding sequence and does
not produce a translational fusion with
lacZ. Since RNase R
has been reported for several species to be required for growth
at low temperatures (
5,
16,
17,
26), we analyzed the growth
of an
L. pneumophila rnr strain under axenic conditions on solid
rich medium at optimal and suboptimal growth temperatures. The
RNase R mutant did not show significant growth defects at optimal
(37°C) or elevated (42°C) growth temperatures (Fig.
1A). In contrast, the
rnr mutant was slightly impaired for growth
at 30°C and more dramatically impaired at 25°C. The
growth defect at low temperature could be suppressed by the
plasmid-borne expression of RNase R (Fig.
1A). Growth in liquid
medium at 30°C provided similar results, with the doubling
time of the RNase R mutant showing a significant increase from
that of the parent strain, JR32 (Fig.
1B). A rapid temperature
downshift from 37°C to 30°C was found to cause the same
growth defect (Fig.
1C). These results are consistent with previous
reports for other species and suggest a role of RNase R in processes
that are required for adaptation to decreased growth temperature.
We also investigated the ability of the
rnr mutant to multiply
intracellularly in the amoeba
Acanthamoeba castellanii and in
THP-1 monocytes. Both phagocytic cells were infected with MOI
of 1:1,000 (bacteria per cell), and
L. pneumophila replication
was monitored by enumerating CFU every 24 h. No observable growth
defect of the
rnr strain was detected in either amoebal or macrophage
host cells (data not shown). The infection of
A. castellanii was performed at 30°C, and even though the
rnr mutant has
a mild growth defect at 30°C in rich medium, this defect
could not be detected by counting CFU. We conclude that RNase
R is dispensable for the intracellular multiplication of
L. pneumophila in both human and protozoan hosts. Overall, these
results are consistent with previous reports for other species
and reinforce the role of RNase R in adaptation to decreased
growth temperature.
Intermediate degradation products of structured RNAs accumulate in the rnr mutant.
The loss of any RNase activity is expected to affect RNA metabolism.
Given the ability of RNase R to degrade structured RNAs, this
should primarily affect the metabolism of stable RNAs. We chose
to analyze the effect of a loss of RNase at 30°C because
at this temperature the growth defect is still mild and it is
thus possible to study the
rnr mutant and the wild-type parent
under similar growth conditions. We extracted total RNA from
the
rnr mutant and wild-type strains grown at 30°C and 37°C
and analyzed them by denaturing polyacrylamide electrophoresis
followed by ethidium bromide staining. Compared to the what
was seen for the wild-type strain, equal amounts of total RNAs
extracted from the
rnr mutant grown at 30°C consistently
revealed an overall stronger staining intensity at low molecular
weights (Fig.
2A). In addition, multiple distinct bands, ranging
from about 190 nt to 500 nt, appeared to accumulate in the
rnr mutant only when it was grown at 30°C. These bands were
either not present or less visible in the wild type grown at
either 30°C or 37°C. It has been previously reported
that in
E. coli RNase R may be involved in the maturation of
the small noncoding and highly structured ribonucleotide tmRNA
(
5). Therefore, we analyzed the extracted RNA and detected the
tmRNA by Northern blotting. The abundance of the tmRNA was not
affected by temperature or by the presence or absence of RNase
R (Fig.
2B). In some experiments we observed a band corresponding
to the pre-tmRNA accumulating in the
rnr mutant at 30°C
and 37°C, but this band was faint and not always detectable.
However, very consistently, an additional band at about 150
nt appeared in the
rnr mutant at 30°C. Very likely, this
represents a partially processed form of the tmRNA. This tmRNA
degradation product does not accumulate in an
rnr mutant at
37°C, where it might be less stable and processed by other
RNases. The small subunit of the ribosome is known to be another
target of RNase R. We therefore looked for degradation products
of the 16S RNA in the
rnr mutant. Northern blots with two different
oligonucleotide probes located on the first half of the 16S
RNA sequence showed that some fragments of the 16S RNA accumulate
in the
rnr mutant at 30°C (Fig.
2C). In conclusion, this
analysis shows that the
rnr mutant is defective for complete
processing of the highly structured 16S RNA and tmRNA which
accumulates in the
rnr mutant at 30°C. In addition, other
unidentified RNA products appeared to accumulate in the absence
of RNase R at 30°C. Taken together, these results demonstrate
a critical role of RNase R in the disposal of structured RNAs
and RNA fragments which are stabilized by low temperatures.
Growth at moderate temperature induces changes in the gene expression profile of wild-type and rnr mutant Legionella strains.
The accumulation of undegraded structured RNAs at low temperature
can affect bacterial physiology and could be responsible for
the decreased viability of the
rnr mutant at low temperatures.
To evaluate the consequence of
rnr disruption on global gene
expression, we performed microarray analysis and gene expression
profiling on the wild type and the isogenic
rnr mutant. Total
RNA was isolated from wild-type strain JR32 and an isogenic
rnr mutant grown at 30°C or 37°C. Reverse-transcribed
RNA samples were used to hybridize a custom-made 70-mer oligonucleotide
array containing duplicates of all predicted open reading frames
of
L. pneumophila Philadelphia-1 (see Materials and Methods).
The changes in gene expression at 30°C compared to 37°C
are summarized in Table
1. Growth of the wild type and the
rnr mutant strain at 30°C resulted in significant increases
in the steady-state levels of mRNA of many genes homologous
to the
E. coli cold shock regulon. These include genes for the
major cold shock protein and RNA chaperone CspA (lpg2121 and
lpg1205) and the DEAD-box RNA helicase DpbA (lpg2122), which
has high activity toward a small hairpin of the 23S ribosomal
subunit (
36). The increase of
cspA (lpg2121) and
dpbA mRNA appeared
to be more pronounced in the
rnr mutant than in the JR32 parent
strain, which provides evidence that the
rnr mutant is not impaired
for the induction of genes required for adaptation to cold.
Other genes encoding ribosome-associated proteins appeared as
a large class of upregulated genes in both the wild-type and
the RNase R-deficient strains. These include genes for four
ribosomal proteins (RimM, S3, L18, and L24), the ribosome-interacting
proteins of the translocon (SecY and SecE), and the elongation
factor EF4 (formerly LepA). EF4 has recently been shown to back-translocate
the ribosome in defective tRNA translocation reactions, giving
a second chance to translocate the tRNA correctly (
28). This
activity would be particularly relevant in the event of the
depletion of tRNAs. Interestingly, several tRNA genes were downregulated
during growth at 30°C, and this downregulation was consistently
more pronounced in the RNase R mutant. Low tRNA availability
induces ribosome stalling and subsequent tmRNA-mediated tagging
(
30) and might explain the previous observation that cells lacking
RNase R consistently displayed higher levels and a somewhat
different pattern of tmRNA-dependent protein tagging (
21). Unexpectedly,
we also observed that the gene encoding the primary DNA polymerase
Pol III, which has DNA repair activity, is also more expressed
at 30°C than at 37°C in both the wild type and the
rnr mutant strain. Comparative analysis of the gene expression profiles
of the RNase R-deficient strain versus the wild type revealed
additional genes specifically induced in the
rnr mutant strain
(Table
2). We found that another gene involved in DNA repair
and replication, encoding the single-strand binding protein
Ssb, is induced at low temperature specifically in the
rnr mutant.
Moreover, several other genes that are involved in the metabolism
and/or uptake of exogenous DNA were specifically induced in
the RNase R-defective strain when it was grown at 30°C.
For example, the gene encoding the small periplasmic competence
protein ComEA is the most strongly upregulated gene in the RNase
R-deficient strain. This gene seems to be upregulated by lower
temperature in both the wild type and the
rnr mutant, but its
expression level is five times higher in the
rnr mutant strain
than in the wild type at 30°C. In addition, genes encoding
components of type IV pili such as PilT and the putative pilin
and prepilin Lpg1870 and Lpg0632 are also upregulated. lpg0632
is the first gene of a putative operon encoding six components
of type IV pili which are all, to a lesser extent, upregulated
in the RNase R-deficient strain (see Table S1 in the supplemental
material). Interestingly, this operon is followed by the gene
encoding the channel protein ComEC, an essential component of
the DNA uptake machinery in bacteria. In conclusion, the growth
of
L. pneumophila at lower temperature seems to induce a cold
shock-like response in both the wild type and the
rnr mutant,
providing evidence that the reduced growth of the
rnr mutant
at 30°C is not caused by repression of genes required for
adaptation to cold. However, growth at 30°C of the
rnr strain
was accompanied by the unanticipated expression of additional
genes involved in DNA metabolism and DNA uptake.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 2. List of genes differentially regulated in the rnr mutant of L. pneumophila compared to the wild type at 30°Ca
|
The gene expression profile of RNase R mutant shows similarities to the gene expression profiles of constitutively competent Legionella mutants.
Two
L. pneumophila mutants have been described previously to
be constitutively competent for DNA uptake and genetic transformation.
These two mutants, the
comR and
proQ mutant strains, were retrieved
from a collection of Tn
903dII
lacZ mutants (
37), and their gene
expression profiles were analyzed upon growth at 30°C. The
two strains showed a significant overlap of more than a hundred
differentially regulated genes (more/less than twofold expressed;
P < 0.005). As expected, many of these genes have functions
related to competence (see Table S2 in the supplemental material).
We then compared the expression of this subset of genes to the
expression profile of the
rnr mutant grown at 30°C and at
37°C. The gene expression profile of the
rnr strain grown
at 30°C has great similarities to the gene expression profile
of the competent
comR and
proQ mutant strains. However, upon
growth at 37°C, the specific gene expression profile of
the
rnr strain diverged from that exhibited by the
comR,
proQ,
and
rnr strains at 30°C and shared more similarities to
the noncompetent JR32 parent strain (Fig.
3A). We found that
all three mutant strains shared a set of 62 differentially expressed
genes, representing about 20% of all genes differentially expressed
in the
rnr mutant (Fig.
3B). We performed Northern blot analysis
on the
comEA gene, which is the most upregulated gene in all
three mutants. The
comEA transcript was not detectable for wild-type
strain JR32 but was detected at 30°C for the
rnr mutant
and at even higher amounts for the
comR and
proQ mutants (Fig.
3C). At 37°C, the abundance of the
comEA transcript seemed
to be unaffected in the
comR and
proQ strains, whereas consistently
with the microarray data it became undetectable in the
rnr mutant.
In conclusion, RNase R directly or indirectly represses a competence-related
regulon in a temperature-dependent manner.
The L. pneumophila rnr mutant is competent for genetic transformation.
The gene expression profiling of the
rnr mutant strongly suggested
that it would be competent for genetic transformation. To test
the ability of the
rnr mutant to take up and integrate exogenous
DNA, we grew the
rnr mutant on CYE plates together with 1 µg
of genomic DNA extracted from the gentamicin-resistant JR32-derived
strain JC51. After 48 h of coincubation at 30°C, the transformation
frequency was determined. The
rnr mutant was competent with
transformants appearing at a frequency of about 1
x 10
–5 per µg of genomic DNA (Fig.
4A), similar to the transformation
frequency observed for the
comR and
proQ mutant strains. The
competence phenotype of the
rnr mutation could be decreased
by the expression of RNase R under the control of an isopropyl-β-
D-thiogalactopyranoside
(IPTG)-inducible P
tac promoter (Fig.
4A). Even in the absence
of IPTG, the competence phenotype of the
rnr mutation could
be decreased, presumably due to promoter leakiness resulting
in a low expression level of RNase R. To confirm that the transformants
appearing in the competence assays were the results of DNA uptake,
we deleted the
comEA and
comEC genes, encoding the periplasmic
DNA binding protein ComEA and the transmembrane DNA channel
ComEC of the DNA uptake machinery. Deletion of
comEC or
comEA resulted in a dramatic drop in transformation frequency (Fig.
4B). The
comEA mutant retained some residual activity (Fig.
4B), consistent with previous observations for other organisms,
suggesting that another unidentified DNA binding protein contributes
to the DNA uptake process. Microarray analysis and Northern
blot analysis showed that expression of
comEA is temperature
dependent in the
rnr mutant but not in the
proQ and
comR mutants.
We then tested the competence of these three mutants at 30°C
and 37°C, along with that of the Lp02 strain, which had
previously been shown to be competent due the acquisition of
an unidentified mutation (
34) (Fig.
4C). While the
comR and
proQ mutants appeared to be constitutively competent regardless
of the temperature, the
rnr mutant was far less competent at
37°C, a situation that was predicted by the
comEA Northern
blot results and is similar to what had been reported for the
Lp02 strain (
34).
Regulation of comEA is posttranscriptional.
To further understand the induction of competence in the
rnr mutant, we analyzed the source of the upregulation of
comEA.
We constructed chromosomal transcriptional
lacZ fusions to the
comEA promoter and to the whole
comEA transcript in the wild-type
strain and the
rnr mutant (Fig.
5A). Determination of beta-galactosidase
activity in the wild type and the
rnr mutant showed only a minor
increase in
comEA promoter activity in the
rnr mutant at both
37°C and 30°C (Fig.
5B). In contrast, a greater increase
(>3-fold) in beta-galactosidase activity was detected in
the
rnr mutant at 30°C when the
lacZ gene was placed at
the end of the
comEA transcript (Fig.
5B). This increase in
comEA-lacZ expression was not observed for the
rnr mutant at
37°C, which is a finding in agreement with the microarray
results. Although we cannot rule out the possibility of the
presence of a regulatory element within the
comEA transcript,
it seems that RNase R does not directly control the
comEA promoter
but rather controls
comEA expression by affecting the steady-state
level of the
comEA mRNA. We analyzed the decay rate of the
comEA mRNA in the wild type and the
rnr mutant. The strains were grown
at 30°C to exponential phase, transcription was stopped
by the addition of rifampin, aliquots were taken at different
time points, and amounts of the
comEA mRNA were quantified by
real-time reverse transcription-PCR (see Materials and Methods).
We found that the decay rate for the
rnr mutant is much lower
than that for the wild type, indicating that RNase R plays a
role in the turnover of the
comEA mRNA (Fig.
5C). Taken together,
these results show that RNase R does not directly control the
promoter of
comEA and that the increased expression of
comEA in the
rnr mutant is largely due to increased stability of its
mRNA.
RNase R does not control the expression of the competence repressors ComR and ProQ.
The identity of the genetic alteration that made the Lp02 strain
competent has not been identified, but its dependence upon temperature
raised the possibility that the
rnr gene might be altered in
Lp02. We tested this possibility by expressing RNase R in the
Lp02 strain and testing its competence at 30°C. We also
expressed RNase R in the
comR and
proQ mutants to find out if
the
comR and
proQ mutations resulted in competence by downregulation
of
rnr. Expression of the
rnr gene did not repress the competence
of Lp02 or of the
comR and
proQ mutants (Fig.
6A). In addition,
the
rnr gene cloned from Lp02 could successfully complement
the
rnr mutation in JR32 (data not shown). The genetic alteration
that makes Lp02 competent is therefore not associated with the
rnr gene. However, the temperature dependency of the
rnr mutant
and the Lp02 strain suggests that the induction of competence
in both strains is controlled by the same regulatory pathway.
In contrast, the fact that the expression of the
rnr gene in
the
comR and
proQ mutants did not lower the level of competence
suggests that the downstream pathway leading to competence in
the
comR and
proQ mutants does not involve RNase R. Indeed,
that pathway is not temperature dependent. Another possibility
would be that RNase R somehow affects the expression of the
competence repressors
comR and
proQ. To test this hypothesis,
we took advantage of the translational
lacZ fusions produced
in the
comR and
proQ mutants by Tn
903dII
lacZ insertions. The
comR::Tn
903dII
lacZ and
proQ::Tn
903dII
lacZ fusions were moved
to the
rnr background, and we measured the expression of the
beta-galactosidase in the wild-type and
rnr backgrounds. The
inactivation of
rnr did not result in significant changes in
the expression of the ComR- and ProQ-LacZ fusions (Fig.
6B).
In addition, the expressions of
comR and
proQ were determined
by quantitative PCR in the wild-type and
rnr backgrounds and
were found to be identical (data not shown). Taken together,
these data support the idea of a temperature-dependent pathway
leading to the induction of competence in the
rnr mutant that
is different from the one involved in the
comR and
proQ mutants.
Enzymatically active RNase R is required to repress competence at 30°C.
RNase R has two RNA binding domains (
1,
4) in addition to the
RNB catalytic domain (Fig.
7A). RNase R, RNase II, and PNPase
(a phosphorolytic exoribonuclease) have an S1 RNA binding domain
at the C termini. The enzymatic activity of PNPase is required
for the optimal functioning of the
Yersinia type three secretion
system (
31). Although PNPase is an exoribonuclease, its enzymatic
activity was not required for the proper function of the type
three secretion system, and the phenotype could be complemented
by the expression of other S1 domains from unrelated RNase or
RNA binding proteins. We tested the possibility that another
RNase harboring an S1 RNA binding domain might be able to complement
the
L. pneumophila RNase R mutant for derepression of competence.
Because
Legionella does not have RNase II, PNPase is the only
exoribonuclease harboring an S1 domain in
Legionella. Even though
overexpression of PNPase appeared to be slightly toxic, it could
not repress competence (data not shown). We then hypothesized
that the hydrolytic exoribonuclease activity of RNase R was
necessary to repress competence. We generated point mutations
of conserved aspartic residues D275A and D283R in the RNase
R active site (Fig.
7A). These residues correspond to residues
D201 and D209 of the
Escherichia coli RNB domain of RNase II
and coordinate magnesium ions. Mutation D201A significantly
reduced exoribonuclease activity (
4,
39), and mutation D209R
abolished RNA activity while retaining RNA binding activity
(
1,
18). We then tested the mutant RNase R's for their ability
to repress the competence of the
rnr mutant. Even though the
mutant enzymes seem to be stable and produced in amounts similar
to those seen for the wild-type enzyme (Fig.
7B), they could
not repress competence (Fig.
7C). This shows that a functional
exoribonuclease domain is required for the repression of competence,
indicating that the sole loss of exoribonuclease activity of
RNase R can dramatically modify gene expression and result in
competence induction.

DISCUSSION
In
E. coli, the highly conserved 3'-5' exoribonuclease R (RNase
R) has been shown to be involved in a variety of cell processes,
including quality control of rRNA, processing of mRNA molecules
with extensive secondary structure, degradation of mRNA on which
ribosome stalling occurs, and maturation of the tmRNA. In spite
of being involved in all of these important processes, an
E. coli rnr mutant does not display any particular defect in cell
growth at optimal growth temperature (37°C). This has been
explained in part by the fact that the two other exoribonucleases,
RNase II and PNPase, display enough functional overlap to perform
the missing functions (
14). In
L. pneumophila, the
rnr gene
is not essential for the growth of the bacterium whether as
a free-living organism or as an intracellular parasite inside
macrophages or amoebas. However, the
rnr mutant displays longer
doubling time at 30°C, suggesting, as for
E. coli, a role
of RNase R in adaptation to low temperatures (
5). We assumed
that under these conditions the inactivation of RNase R would
have an effect on the transcriptional profile of the bacteria.
Interestingly, this experiment had never been performed with
E. coli but proved to be highly informative for
L. pneumophila.
Regardless of growth temperature (30°C or 37°C), we
observed changes in the steady-state level of mRNA in the
rnr mutant. These changes affected a limited number of genes. Not
surprisingly, growth at 30°C correlated with a moderate
induction of a cold shock-like response, which was more pronounced
in the
rnr mutant. More surprisingly, the
rnr mutation also
resulted in the upregulation of competence-related genes.
Bacterial competence is a genetically programmed process which is triggered as a response to environmental stimuli. DNA uptake from the extracellular milieu by competence requires the expression of a complex machinery composed of a competence pseudopilus and a DNA translocase (8). In L. pneumophila, it has been reported that microaerophilic conditions (35) and genetic alteration of the competence repressors ComR and ProQ result in competence (34). Whereas growth under microaerophilic conditions results in a transformation frequency of about 10–6 with more than 100 µg of genomic DNA, the genetic alterations of proQ or comR result in a transformation frequency of 10–5 with only 1 µg of genomic DNA. This suggests that the environmental signal that triggers the expression of the competence regulon in L. pneumophila has yet to be found.
Many competence genes were found to be induced in the rnr mutant and represent a notable upregulated regulon. The DNA translocase-encoding genes comEA and comEC were both found to be upregulated in the rnr mutant. Although not observed from the microarray data, the comEC gene has been found to be upregulated by threefold by use of quantitative PCR (data not shown). Comparison of the expression profiles of the rnr mutant and the competent comR and proQ mutants showed that the induction of a competence regulon was temperature dependent. As predicted by the microarray analysis, the rnr mutant was found to be competent for genetic transformation only at 30°C but not at 37°C, a feature that is not shared by the constitutively competent comR and proQ mutants. Indeed, the induction of competence in the rnr mutant was found to be independent of the competence repressors ComR and ProQ. Because RNase R is involved in the tmRNA-dependent degradation of mRNA (5, 19, 26) and the degradation of repetitive extragenic palindrome (REP)-containing mRNA (10) and the ompA mRNA (2), the upregulation of the competence genes could have been attributed to the increase in the steady-state level of the mRNA targets of RNase R. In E. coli, the expression of RNase R can support the degradation of the cspA mRNA, which is stabilized by low temperature by the absence of the DEAD-box RNA helicase CsdA (3). The induction of competence in the rnr mutant could be the result of the stabilization of the mRNA of the competence regulon. Supporting this hypothesis, we found that the induction of comEA expression is not due to higher promoter activity. Instead, we found that the comEA mRNA has a longer half-life in the rnr mutant, indicating that it is a substrate of RNase R. Indeed, the sole inactivation of the exoribonuclease activity of RNase R at 30°C is sufficient to induce competence development. A recent genome-wide analysis of mRNA decay in an rnr mutant of Pseudomonas putida has revealed the important role of RNase R in mRNA turnover (17). Although RNase R is active on mRNAs containing REP sequences, the mRNAs affected by the lack of RNase R were not enriched in REP-containing sequences. We could not identify any REP sequence within the comEA mRNA and the mechanism underlying its increased stability is unclear. An alternative explanation would be that the comEA mRNA becomes a substrate of RNase R as a consequence of ribosome stalling. Ribosome stalling can be induced by rare codons or by a low availability of tRNA (30), and several tRNAs show reduced steady-state levels in the rnr mutant at 30°C (Table 3). The selective degradation by RNase R of mRNA on which the ribosome is stalled is dependent on the presence of the SmpB protein and tmRNA (29), and the absence of either SmpB or tmRNA results in an increased level of mRNA, inducing ribosome stalling. If the comEA mRNA is subject to RNase R because of ribosome stalling, a mutation of either smbB or tmRNA should also result in increased expression of comEA and eventually in competence development. Unfortunately, despite repeated attempts, we could not obtain ssrA or smpB mutants, suggesting that these genes are essential for viability in L. pneumophila.
Further work will be necessary to understand the mechanism of
competence development in the
rnr mutant and might help us understand
the function of RNase R and the regulatory cascade leading to
competence development in
L. pneumophila. The induction of competence
in the
rnr mutant is a remarkable finding, since it is the first
report of a gain of function due to the loss of RNase R.
L. pneumophila may provide a convenient model system to study the
function of RNase R, because the loss of RNase R activity has
directly measurable transcriptional consequences.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Murray Deutscher (Department of Biochemistry and Molecular
Biology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine) for
kindly providing polyclonal antibodies against RNase R. We thank
the two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments
and detailed corrections. We also thank members of the Shuman
lab for helpful discussion and comments.
This work was supported by NIH grants AI064481 and AI023549 awarded to H.A.S. X.C. was supported in part by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (FRM) and by NIH funding to H.A.S. S.P.F. is supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from NSERC.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Microbiology, Columbia University Medical Center, 701 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032. Phone: (212) 305-6913. Fax: (212) 305-1468. E-mail:
has7{at}columbia.edu 
Published ahead of print on 10 October 2008. 
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://jb.asm.org/. 

REFERENCES
1 - Amblar, M., A. Barbas, P. Gomez-Puertas, and C. M. Arraiano. 2007. The role of the S1 domain in exoribonucleolytic activity: substrate specificity and multimerization. RNA 13:317-327.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2 - Andrade, J. M., F. Cairrão, and C. M. Arraiano. 2006. RNase R affects gene expression in stationary phase: regulation of ompA. Mol. Microbiol. 60:219-228.[CrossRef][Medline]
3 - Awano, N., C. Xu, H. Ke, K. Inoue, M. Inouye, and S. Phadtare. 2007. Complementation analysis of the cold-sensitive phenotype of the Escherichia coli csdA deletion strain. J. Bacteriol. 189:5808-5815.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4 - Barbas, A., R. G. Matos, M. Amblar, E. López-Viñas, P. Gomez-Puertas, and C. M. Arraiano. 2008. New insights into the mechanism of RNA degradation by ribonuclease II: identification of the residue responsible for setting the RNase II end product. J. Biol. Chem. 283:13070-13076.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5 - Cairrão, F., A. Cruz, H. Mori, and C. M. Arraiano. 2003. Cold shock induction of RNase R and its role in the maturation of the quality control mediator SsrA/tmRNA. Mol. Microbiol. 50:1349-1360.[CrossRef][Medline]
6 - Carpousis, A. J. 2007. The RNA degradosome of Escherichia coli: an mRNA-degrading machine assembled on RNase E. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 61:71-87.[Medline]
7 - Chen, C., and M. P. Deutscher. 2005. Elevation of RNase R in response to multiple stress conditions. J. Biol. Chem. 280:34393-34396.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8 - Chen, I., and D. Dubnau. 2004. DNA uptake during bacterial transformation. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2:241-249.[CrossRef][Medline]
9 - Chen, J., K. S. de Felipe, M. Clarke, H. Lu, O. R. Anderson, G. Segal, and H. A. Shuman. 2004. Legionella effectors that promote nonlytic release from protozoa. Science 303:1358-1361.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10 - Cheng, Z., and M. P. Deutscher. 2005. An important role for RNase R in mRNA decay. Mol. Cell 17:313-318.[CrossRef][Medline]
11 - Cheng, Z., and M. P. Deutscher. 2002. Purification and characterization of the Escherichia coli exoribonuclease RNase R. Comparison with RNase II. J. Biol. Chem. 277:21624-21629.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12 - Cheng, Z., and M. P. Deutscher. 2003. Quality control of ribosomal RNA mediated by polynucleotide phosphorylase and RNase R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:6388-6393.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13 - de Felipe, K. S., R. T. Glover, X. Charpentier, O. R. Anderson, M. Reyes, C. D. Pericone, and H. A. Shuman. 2008. Legionella eukaryotic-like type IV substrates interfere with organelle trafficking. PLoS Pathogens 4:e1000117.[CrossRef][Medline]
14 - Deutscher, M. P. 2006. Degradation of RNA in bacteria: comparison of mRNA and stable RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 34:659-666.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15 - Edgar, R., M. Domrachev, and A. E. Lash. 2002. Gene Expression Omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:207-210.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16 - Erova, T. E., V. G. Kosykh, A. A. Fadl, J. Sha, A. J. Horneman, and A. K. Chopra. 2008. Cold shock exoribonuclease R (VacB) is involved in Aeromonas hydrophila pathogenesis. J. Bacteriol. 190:3467-3474.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17 - Fonseca, P., R. Moreno, and F. Rojo. 2008. Genomic analysis of the role of RNase R in the turnover of Pseudomonas putida mRNAs. J. Bacteriol. 190:6258-6263.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18 - Frazão, C., C. E. McVey, M. Amblar, A. Barbas, C. Vonrhein, C. M. Arraiano, and M. A. Carrondo. 2006. Unravelling the dynamics of RNA degradation by ribonuclease II and its RNA-bound complex. Nature 443:110-114.[CrossRef][Medline]
19 - Hong, S., Q. Tran, and K. C. Keiler. 2005. Cell cycle-regulated degradation of tmRNA is controlled by RNase R and SmpB. Mol. Microbiol. 57:565-575.[CrossRef][Medline]
20 - Hutchison, C. A., S. N. Peterson, S. R. Gill, R. T. Cline, O. White, C. M. Fraser, H. O. Smith, and J. C. Venter. 1999. Global transposon mutagenesis and a minimal Mycoplasma genome. Science 286:2165-2169.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21 - Karzai, A. W., and R. T. Sauer. 2001. Protein factors associated with the SsrA. SmpB tagging and ribosome rescue complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:3040-3044.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22 - Lalonde, M. S., Y. Zuo, J. Zhang, X. Gong, S. Wu, A. Malhotra, and Z. Li. 2007. Exoribonuclease R in Mycoplasma genitalium can carry out both RNA processing and degradative functions and is sensitive to RNA ribose methylation. RNA 13:1957-1968.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23 - Mian, I. S. 1997. Comparative sequence analysis of ribonucleases HII, III, II PH and D. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:3187-3195.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24 - Nikawa, J., and M. Kawabata. 1998. PCR- and ligation-mediated synthesis of marker cassettes with long flanking homology regions for gene disruption in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res. 26:860-861.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25 - Purusharth, R. I., F. Klein, S. Sulthana, S. Jäger, M. V. Jagannadham, E. Evguenieva-Hackenberg, M. K. Ray, and G. Klug. 2005. Exoribonuclease R interacts with endoribonuclease E and an RNA helicase in the psychrotrophic bacterium Pseudomonas syringae Lz4W. J. Biol. Chem. 280:14572-14578.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26 - Purusharth, R. I., B. Madhuri, and M. K. Ray. 2007. Exoribonuclease R in Pseudomonas syringae is essential for growth at low temperature and plays a novel role in the 3' end processing of 16 and 5 S ribosomal RNA. J. Biol. Chem. 282:16267-16277.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27 - Py, B., C. F. Higgins, H. M. Krisch, and A. J. Carpousis. 1996. A DEAD-box RNA helicase in the Escherichia coli RNA degradosome. Nature 381:169-172.[CrossRef][Medline]
28 - Qin, Y., N. Polacek, O. Vesper, E. Staub, E. Einfeldt, D. N. Wilson, and K. H. Nierhaus. 2006. The highly conserved LepA is a ribosomal elongation factor that back-translocates the ribosome. Cell 127:721-733.[CrossRef][Medline]
29 - Richards, J., P. Mehta, and A. W. Karzai. 2006. RNase R degrades non-stop mRNAs selectively in an SmpB-tmRNA-dependent manner. Mol. Microbiol. 62:1700-1712.[CrossRef][Medline]
30 - Roche, E. D., and R. T. Sauer. 1999. SsrA-mediated peptide tagging caused by rare codons and tRNA scarcity. EMBO J. 18:4579-4589.[CrossRef][Medline]
31 - Rosenzweig, J. A., G. Weltman, G. V. Plano, and K. Schesser. 2005. Modulation of Yersinia type three secretion system by the S1 domain of polynucleotide phosphorylase. J. Biol. Chem. 280:156-163.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32 - Sadosky, A. B., L. A. Wiater, and H. A. Shuman. 1993. Identification of Legionella pneumophila genes required for growth within and killing of human macrophages. Infect. Immun. 61:5361-5373.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33 - Segal, G., and H. A. Shuman. 1997. Characterization of a new region required for macrophage killing by Legionella pneumophila. Infect. Immun. 65:5057-5066.[Abstract]
34 - Sexton, J. A., and J. P. Vogel. 2004. Regulation of hypercompetence in Legionella pneumophila. J. Bacteriol. 186:3814-3825.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35 - Stone, B. J., and Y. A. Kwaik. 1999. Natural competence for DNA transformation by Legionella pneumophila and its association with expression of type IV pili. J. Bacteriol. 181:1395-1402.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36 - Tsu, C. A., K. Kossen, and O. C. Uhlenbeck. 2001. The Escherichia coli DEAD protein DbpA recognizes a small RNA hairpin in 23S rRNA. RNA 7:702-709.[Abstract]
37 - Wiater, L. A., A. B. Sadosky, and H. A. Shuman. 1994. Mutagenesis of Legionella pneumophila using Tn903 dlllacZ: identification of a growth-phase-regulated pigmentation gene. Mol. Microbiol. 11:641-653.[CrossRef][Medline]
38 - Zuo, Y., and M. P. Deutscher. 2001. Exoribonuclease superfamilies: structural analysis and phylogenetic distribution. Nucleic Acids Res. 29:1017-1026.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39 - Zuo, Y., H. A. Vincent, J. Zhang, Y. Wang, M. P. Deutscher, and A. Malhotra. 2006. Structural basis for processivity and single-strand specificity of RNase II. Mol. Cell 24:149-156.[CrossRef][Medline]
Journal of Bacteriology, December 2008, p. 8126-8136, Vol. 190, No. 24
0021-9193/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JB.01035-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Hovel-Miner, G., Pampou, S., Faucher, S. P., Clarke, M., Morozova, I., Morozov, P., Russo, J. J., Shuman, H. A., Kalachikov, S.
(2009). {sigma}S Controls Multiple Pathways Associated with Intracellular Multiplication of Legionella pneumophila. J. Bacteriol.
191: 2461-2473
[Abstract]
[Full Text]