Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, December 2008, p. 8225-8229, Vol. 190, No. 24
0021-9193/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JB.00912-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Center for Infectious Diseases and Travel Medicine, University Hospital, and Department of Medicine, Albert Ludwigs University, Freiburg, Germany,1 Institute of Physiology and Zürich Centre for Integrative Human Physiology, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland2
Received 2 July 2008/ Accepted 1 October 2008
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
While previous crystallographic studies with crystals grown in trigonal space group R32 described a symmetric AcrB trimer, recent studies of structures derived from monoclinic crystals described an asymmetric trimer in which each protomer was suggested to correspond to a distinct functional state of a proposed three-step transport cycle reminiscent of a peristaltic pump (9, 12, 13). In this model, the protomer in its binding or tight-state conformation forms a hydrophobic pocket defined by phenylalanines 136, 178, 610, 615, 617, and 628.
Analysis of doxorubicin- and minocycline-complexed AcrB crystals suggested that these two compounds interact with different residues of the binding protomer. Minocycline seemed to interact with F178, N274, and F615, while doxorubicin seemed to interact with Q176, F615 and F617 (9). Thus, it was proposed that the extremely broad substrate spectrum of AcrB could be explained by the flexible interaction of various ligands mostly with hydrophobic phenylalanines and to a minor degree with polar residues in the binding pocket.
Support for this model also came from several mutational studies which found that substrate specificity in RND efflux pumps is determined by residues in the periplasmic domain (2-4, 7, 8). A recent study found that the V610F mutation in the E. coli RND efflux pump YhiV, which is homologous to the V612F mutation in AcrB, leads to a 16-fold increase in the linezolid MIC compared to the MIC of the YhiUV-overproducing wild-type strain (2).
However, no systematic site-directed mutagenesis study of the phenylalanine residues that form the proposed hydrophobic binding pocket in AcrB has been described previously.
In the present study we constructed and tested such phenylalanine mutants to examine the functional role of hydrophobic residues in the proposed AcrB multidrug binding site. We used as the parental strain the previously described multidrug-resistant (gyrA marR) acrB-overexpressing E. coli K-12 strain 3-AG100 that was obtained after repeated exposure to a fluoroquinolone (5).
For site-directed mutagenesis the phage
-based homologous recombination system (Red/ET counterselection Bac modification kit; GeneBridges, Heidelberg, Germany) was used to introduce an rpsL-neo cassette into the acrB gene of strain 3-AG100 (grown in Luria-Bertani broth) and to subsequently replace the cassette with an appropriate oligonucleotide (the sequences of the PCR primers and oligonucleotides that were obtained from Thermo Electron [Ulm, Germany] are shown in Table 1). Recombination events were confirmed by PCR and nucleotide sequencing of the acrB gene using standard techniques.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Oligonucleotides and primers used for Red/ET-recombinationa
|
![]() View larger version (45K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Western blot analysis of mutant AcrB production. Total protein extracts of E. coli 3-AG100 mutants (14 µg protein) were separated by NuPAGE Novex bis-Tris (Invitrogen, California) gel electrophoresis and probed with polyclonal anti-AcrB antibodies. Lanes MW contained molecular weight markers.
|
The susceptibilities of the different mutants to various antimicrobials and dyes and to the putative efflux pump inhibitors 1-naphthylmethylpiperazine (NMP) and PAβN were characterized by determining MICs in 96-well microtiter plates as described previously (1, 2, 6) and are shown in Table 2. EtBr (external concentration, 2.5 µM) and PAβN (external concentration, 200 µM) fluorescence accumulation assays were carried out at least in duplicate for 30 min using our previously described protocol (2). Both EtBr and PAβN are excellent substrates of AcrAB-TolC and were chosen since they are structurally diverse; thus, the recognition by the AcrB binding pocket was assumed to be mediated by different residues. EtBr is a nonspecific DNA intercalator which, upon binding to its target structure, causes enhancement of fluorescence, while the intrinsically low-fluorescence compound PAβN is cleaved by esterases, yielding the highly fluorescent compound β-naphthylamine as described previously in a study using the related substrate Ala-Nap (naphthylamide) (6). The results obtained are shown in Fig. 2a and 2b. We also used an EtBr concentration of 25 µM and a PAβN concentration of 20 µM and obtained similar results (data not shown).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. MICs of different pump substrates for AcrB mutants of E. coli 3-AG100a
|
![]() View larger version (24K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Increases in EtBr (a) and PAβN (b) fluorescence in AcrB phenylalanine mutants compared to pseudomutant AcrB strain F628F. Fluorescence was recorded for 30 min after addition of 2.5 µM EtBr or 200 µM PAβN. The values are means of at least duplicate experiments. RFU, relative fluorescence units.
|
2-fold after 30 min. The crystallographic structure of the asymmetric AcrB trimer suggests that the main interactions between substrates and protein are due to an ensemble of phenylalanines mediating hydrophobic interactions, which might explain the extremely broad substrate specificity (Fig. 3). Surprisingly, although the AcrB cocrystallization with doxorubicin and minocycline suggested that there is a strong interaction of these substrates with F178 and F615, the F615A and F178A mutations had no measurable impact on the MICs of these two substrates. Deletion of amino acids 615 to 617 was associated with minor changes in the susceptibility to minocycline and some changes in the MICs of macrolides and oxacillin.
![]() View larger version (39K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. AcrB binding pocket based on the "tight" monomer 2GIF structure coordinates (12). Phenylalanines are indicated by sticks. The image was generated using the molecular visualization software PyMol (http://pymol.sourceforge.net).
|
To test this hypothesis, we generated the F615A/F617A/F628A triple phenylalanine mutant; however, since we obtained only a weak Western blot band (Fig. 1), suggesting that the level of expression of the mutant AcrB protein was low, we did not include this mutant in further analyses.
The F610A mutant, however, displayed dramatically enhanced susceptibility to almost all AcrB substrates tested (but not to aminoglycosides and NMP, which are not AcrB substrates), although the absolute changes varied considerably for different substrates. In contrast, the F610A mutation increased EtBr accumulation only moderately and did not affect PAβN accumulation. This difference might have been due to the different time windows between the MIC and fluorescence experiments. The dramatic impact on substrate MICs indicates that the F610 residue has a special role in the substrate extrusion process, although the exact mechanism remains unclear. The other targeted mutations, including conversion of phenylalanines 136, 178, 615, 617, and 628 to alanine, generally had smaller effects on substrate susceptibility and presumably efflux function and binding, and the effects were variable depending on the substrate.
Published ahead of print on 10 October 2008. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»