This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yildiz, F. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yildiz, F. H.

Next Article 

Journal of Bacteriology, February 2008, p. 781-783, Vol. 190, No. 3
0021-9193/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JB.01852-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

GUEST COMMENTARY

Cyclic Dimeric GMP Signaling and Regulation of Surface-Associated Developmental Programs{triangledown}

Fitnat H. Yildiz*

Department of Environmental Toxicology, University of California at Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California 95064

Cyclic dimeric GMP (c-di-GMP) has emerged as a ubiquitous second messenger in bacteria that controls the transition from the free-living, motile lifestyle to the biofilm lifestyle (5, 12, 19). Production and degradation of c-di-GMP are controlled by proteins containing the GGDEF and EAL or HD-GYP domains, respectively. The GGDEF domain harbors intrinsic diguanylate cyclase (DGC) activity, and the EAL or HD-GYP domain has c-di-GMP phosphodiesterase (PDE) activity (4, 21-23). c-di-GMP was initially identified in Gluconacetobacter xylinus as an allosteric activator of cellulose synthase (20). Recent studies have shown that c-di-GMP modulates cell differentiation, biofilm formation, motility, and virulence in a diverse group of microorganisms (5, 12, 19). Our understanding of the biological processes and target molecules controlled by c-di-GMP signaling is increasing. However, at present, we have a limited understanding of the mechanisms through which c-di-GMP affects biofilm formation, mechanisms by which the activity of GGDEF/EAL proteins are regulated, and how multiple GGDEF and EAL domain proteins contribute to cellular c-di-GMP levels. In this issue, a new study by Ferreira et al. (8) is beginning to shed light on these questions in Vibrio parahaemolyticus, a facultative human pathogen responsible for the most common Vibrio-associated, seafood-borne gastroenteritis.

STICKING OR SWARMING

Biofilms are surface-attached microbial communities composed of microorganisms and the extracellular polymers they produce. Biofilm formation is thought to be a developmental process that begins when a bacterium attaches to a surface. After the initial attachment, colonization of a surface is mediated by movement and growth of attached bacteria and production of biofilm matrix components (exopolysaccharides, proteins, nucleic acids, membrane vesicles), leading to the development of mature biofilm structures that are characterized by pillars and channels (18).

Many bacterial processes are involved in biofilm formation. One such process is flagellum-mediated motility, which facilitates attachment to surfaces and colonization of surfaces. V. parahaemolyticus possesses two flagellar systems: a polar flagellum and peritrichously arranged lateral flagella (Laf) (16). When grown in liquid environments, V. parahaemolyticus is polarly flagellated. However, when on a surface or in a medium of high viscosity, the organism produces lateral flagella, which enable the bacterium to move over and colonize surfaces in a process called swarming motility. When grown on a surface, V. parahaemolyticus is also capable of producing a capsular polysaccharide that enables biofilm formation (6, 7, 10). Thus, biofilm formation in V. parahaemolyticus involves not only a switch from a motile planktonic state to a surface-attached state but also a switch between the surface-associated motile (swarming) and surface-associated sessile (biofilm) states. It appears that c-di-GMP signaling is involved in the latter process in V. parahaemolyticus.

Ferreira et al. (8) and two earlier studies (1, 13) have shown that an increase in cellular c-di-GMP levels prevents swarming motility and promotes biofilm formation. These studies determined that the scrABC and scrG loci (swarming and capsular polysaccharide gene regulation), which were originally identified by their ability to induce laf gene expression when grown in liquid medium (a condition that normally represses laf gene expression), inversely regulate swarming motility and biofilm formation in V. parahaemolyticus. In the scrABC operon, scrA is predicted to encode a pyridoxal-phosphate-dependent enzyme, scrB encodes an extracellular solute-binding protein, and scrC encodes a protein that harbors both GGDEF and EAL domains on the same polypeptide and is predicted to be a bifunctional protein with DGC and PDE activities (1, 8). ScrG harbors a PAS domain and a tandemly arranged GGDEF-EAL output module. ScrG lacks the conserved residues in the GGDEF domain that are critical for DGC activity. The ScrG EAL domain is also not conserved (ESL); however, ScrG functions as a PDE (13). Null mutants of scrABC and of scrG exhibit decreased laf and increased cps gene expression. Consequently, these mutants have reduced swarming motility and enhanced biofilm formation. Epistasis analysis indicates that ScrG and ScrABC act in the same regulatory circuitry and that scrG and scrABC double mutants show a cumulative effect at the level of laf and cps gene expression. It is noteworthy that neither scrG nor scrC mutants exhibit a defect in polar flagellum production and swimming motility, indicating that these specific proteins are not involved in swimming-versus-swarming decision making (1, 13). Although we now know many of the molecular players, we still do not understand the molecular mechanism(s) through which c-di-GMP controls the transcription of the laf and cps genes.

Recent studies have revealed that c-di-GMP signaling also inversely regulates swarming motility and biofilm formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Swarming motility in P. aeruginosa is mediated by the polar flagellum and rhamnolipid surfactants (3). Biofilm formation requires the production of glucose- and/or mannose-rich exopolysaccharides, produced by pel and psl loci, respectively (9, 11, 15). It was shown that SadC, a membrane-localized diguanylate cyclase, inversely regulates biofilm formation and swarming motility in P. aeruginosa (17). The sadC mutant is defective in transitioning from reversible to irreversible surface attachment and has increased swarming motility and decreased biofilm formation. Another component of c-di-GMP signaling regulating surface-associated behaviors in P. aeruginosa is BifA, a membrane-localized protein with PDE activity (14). The bifA mutant has a hyperbiofilm phenotype and an increased capacity to produce the Pel polysaccharide and is defective for swarming motility. One of the main effector proteins controlling inverse regulation of swarming motility and biofilm formation is SadB, a cytoplasmically localized protein capable of modulating flagellar reversal in a viscosity-dependent manner (2). SadB mutants exhibit increased swarming motility and a decrease in biofilm formation. Transcription of pel genes is not altered in SadB mutants, indicating that its effect on Pel exopolysaccharide production is at the posttranslational level (2). The effects of SadB on biofilm formation and swarming are mediated by modulation of flagellar rotation only in high-viscosity environments by the components of the chemotaxis IV cluster system (2). Epistasis analysis has revealed that SadC, BifA, and SadB are components of a c-di-GMP signaling network that controls surface-associated motile and sessile behaviors, via a chemotaxis-like regulatory system, in P. aeruginosa (14, 17).

MODULATION OF ACTIVITY OF GGDEF-EAL PROTEINS

One of the least understood aspects of c-di-GMP signaling is how the activity of proteins containing conserved GGDEF-EAL modules is regulated. The study by Ferreira et al. also contributes to our understanding of the enzymology of bifunctional proteins. Ferreira et al. showed that overexpression of scrABC induces the expression of laf genes and represses the expression of cps genes (8). Interestingly, overexpression of scrC in the absence of scrAB does not induce the expression of laf genes but induces cps gene expression (8). This finding suggests that ScrC activity is modulated by ScrAB. Through genetic analysis, coupled with c-di-GMP quantification, the authors show that ScrC is a bifunctional enzyme. ScrC can act as a DGC and is capable of producing c-di-GMP. However, when produced together with ScrA and ScrB, ScrC functions as a PDE and degrades c-di-GMP. It is proposed by Ferreira et al. that the activity of ScrC could be modulated by environmental factors; however, ScrC does not possess sensory modules. The authors propose that ScrB, which is localized to the periplasm, can function as a "sensory module." According to their model, in response to an environmental signal, ScrB interacts with the periplasmic domain of ScrC and modulates the activity of cytoplasmically localized GGDEF-EAL output domains.

Another elegant example of a bifunctional c-di-GMP signaling protein is bacteriophytochrome BphG1 from Rhodobacter sphaeroides (24). Bacteriophytochromes function as red/far red light receptors that often regulate pigment production and motility; however, the role of BphG1 remains unknown. BphG1 harbors a PAS-GAF-PHY photosensory module and a tandemly arranged GGDEF-EAL output module. It has been shown that BphG1 can function either as a light-dependent DGC or as a light-independent PDE (24). The switch between the opposite enzymatic activities is predicted to be mediated by cleavage of the C-terminal EAL domain. It is proposed that a strong dimerization between EAL domains of BphG1 prevents "productive dimerization" of the GGDEF domains critical for DGC activity, which "locks" BphG1 in the PDE mode. Upon cleavage of the EAL domain, the GGDEF domain regains flexibility and can undergo conformational changes, which are activated by red light and lead to expression of DGC activity.

Understanding how bacteria sense and adapt to life on surfaces is fundamental to our understanding of the molecular mechanisms of biofilm formation and dissolution. It is clear that c-di-GMP signaling is an integral part of biofilm development dynamics. c-di-GMP not only regulates the transition from the motile planktonic to the sessile life style in a diverse group of microorganisms but also regulates the transition from a surface-attached motile to a sessile life style. A major question in c-di-GMP signaling is how c-di-GMP production turns into a specific cellular response. It is becoming clear that c-di-GMP can exert its effect at both the transcriptional and posttranslational levels. Determining the molecular mechanisms through which c-di-GMP affects biofilm development dynamics remains a challenging but exciting area of investigation.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

I thank Mark Gomelsky and George O'Toole for constructive comments on the manuscript and Linda McCarter for a helpful discussion.

Biofilm work in my laboratory is funded by NIH (AI055987).


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Mailing address: Department of Environmental Toxicology, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064. Phone: (831) 459-1588. Fax: (831) 459-3524. E-mail: yildiz{at}etox.ucsc.edu Back

FOOTNOTES

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 7 December 2007. Back

The views expressed in this Commentary do not necessarily reflect the views of the journal or of ASM.

REFERENCES

    1
  1. Boles, B. R., and L. L. McCarter. 2002. Vibrio parahaemolyticus scrABC, a novel operon affecting swarming and capsular polysaccharide regulation. J. Bacteriol. 184:5946-5954.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    2. 2
  2. Caiazza, N. C., J. H. Merritt, K. M. Brothers, and G. A. O'Toole. 2007. Inverse regulation of biofilm formation and swarming motility by Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14. J. Bacteriol. 189:3603-3612.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    3. 3
  3. Caiazza, N. C., R. M. Shanks, and G. A. O'Toole. 2005. Rhamnolipids modulate swarming motility patterns of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 187:7351-7361.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    4. 4
  4. Christen, M., B. Christen, M. Folcher, A. Schauerte, and U. Jenal. 2005. Identification and characterization of a cyclic di-GMP-specific phosphodiesterase and its allosteric control by GTP. J. Biol. Chem. 280:30829-30837.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    5. 5
  5. Cotter, P. A., and S. Stibitz. 2007. c-di-GMP-mediated regulation of virulence and biofilm formation. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 10:17-23.[CrossRef][Medline]
    6. 6
  6. Enos-Berlage, J. L., Z. T. Guvener, C. E. Keenan, and L. L. McCarter. 2005. Genetic determinants of biofilm development of opaque and translucent Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Mol. Microbiol. 55:1160-1182.[CrossRef][Medline]
    7. 7
  7. Enos-Berlage, J. L., and L. L. McCarter. 2000. Relation of capsular polysaccharide production and colonial cell organization to colony morphology in Vibrio parahaemolyticus. J. Bacteriol. 182:5513-5520.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    8. 8
  8. Ferreira, R. B. R., L. C. M. Antunes, E. P. Greenberg, and L. L. McCarter. 2008. Vibrio parahaemolyticus ScrC modulates cyclic dimeric GMP regulation of gene expression relevant to growth on surfaces. J. Bacteriol. 190:851-860.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    9. 9
  9. Friedman, L., and R. Kolter. 2004. Two genetic loci produce distinct carbohydrate-rich structural components of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm matrix. J. Bacteriol. 186:4457-4465.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    10. 10
  10. Güvener, Z. T., and L. L. McCarter. 2003. Multiple regulators control capsular polysaccharide production in Vibrio parahaemolyticus. J. Bacteriol. 185:5431-5441.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    11. 11
  11. Jackson, K. D., M. Starkey, S. Kremer, M. R. Parsek, and D. J. Wozniak. 2004. Identification of psl, a locus encoding a potential exopolysaccharide that is essential for Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 biofilm formation. J. Bacteriol. 186:4466-4475.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    12. 12
  12. Jenal, U., and J. Malone. 2006. Mechanisms of cyclic-di-GMP signaling in bacteria. Annu. Rev. Genet. 40:385-407.[CrossRef][Medline]
    13. 13
  13. Kim, Y. K., and L. L. McCarter. 2007. ScrG, a GGDEF-EAL protein, participates in regulating swarming and sticking in Vibrio parahaemolyticus. J. Bacteriol. 189:4094-4107.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    14. 14
  14. Kuchma, S. L., K. M. Brothers, J. H. Merritt, N. T. Liberati, F. M. Ausubel, and G. A. O'Toole. 2007. BifA, a cyclic-di-GMP phosphodiesterase, inversely regulates biofilm formation and swarming motility by Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14. J. Bacteriol. 189:8165-8178.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    15. 15
  15. Matsukawa, M., and E. P. Greenberg. 2004. Putative exopolysaccharide synthesis genes influence Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm development. J. Bacteriol. 186:4449-4456.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    16. 16
  16. McCarter, L. L. 2004. Dual flagellar systems enable motility under different circumstances. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 7:18-29.[CrossRef][Medline]
    17. 17
  17. Merritt, J. H., K. M. Brothers, S. L. Kuchma, and G. A. O'Toole. 2007. SadC reciprocally influences biofilm formation and swarming motility via modulation of exopolysaccharide production and flagellar function. J. Bacteriol. 189:8154-8164.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    18. 18
  18. O'Toole, G., H. B. Kaplan, and R. Kolter. 2000. Biofilm formation as microbial development. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 54:49-79.[CrossRef][Medline]
    19. 19
  19. Römling, U., M. Gomelsky, and M. Y. Galperin. 2005. C-di-GMP: the dawning of a novel bacterial signalling system. Mol. Microbiol. 57:629-639.[CrossRef][Medline]
    20. 20
  20. Ross, P., Y. Aloni, H. Weinhouse, D. Michaeli, P. Weinberger-Ohana, R. Mayer, and M. Benziman. 1986. Control of cellulose synthesis in Acetobacter xylinum. A unique guanyl oligonucleotide is the immediate activator of cellulose synthase. Carbohydr. Res. 149:101-117.[CrossRef]
    21. 21
  21. Ryan, R. P., Y. Fouhy, J. F. Lucey, L. C. Crossman, S. Spiro, Y. W. He, L. H. Zhang, S. Heeb, M. Camara, P. Williams, and J. M. Dow. 2006. Cell-cell signaling in Xanthomonas campestris involves an HD-GYP domain protein that functions in cyclic di-GMP turnover. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103:6712-6717.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    22. 22
  22. Ryjenkov, D. A., M. Tarutina, O. V. Moskvin, and M. Gomelsky. 2005. Cyclic diguanylate is a ubiquitous signaling molecule in bacteria: insights into biochemistry of the GGDEF protein domain. J. Bacteriol. 187:1792-1798.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    23. 23
  23. Schmidt, A. J., D. A. Ryjenkov, and M. Gomelsky. 2005. The ubiquitous protein domain EAL is a cyclic diguanylate-specific phosphodiesterase: enzymatically active and inactive EAL domains. J. Bacteriol. 187:4774-4781.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    24. 24
  24. Tarutina, M., D. A. Ryjenkov, and M. Gomelsky. 2006. An unorthodox bacteriophytochrome from Rhodobacter sphaeroides involved in turnover of the second messenger c-di-GMP. J. Biol. Chem. 281:34751-34758.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Journal of Bacteriology, February 2008, p. 781-783, Vol. 190, No. 3
0021-9193/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JB.01852-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yildiz, F. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yildiz, F. H.

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»