Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, February 2008, p. 815-822, Vol. 190, No. 3
0021-9193/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JB.00582-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

E. I. Vivas, and
D. M. Downs*
Department of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706
Received 16 April 2007/ Accepted 1 June 2007
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (35K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Reactions catalyzed by the TrpE, TrpD, and TrpC enzymes in the tryptophan biosynthetic pathway. (A) The heterotetrameric complex (TrpE2D2) catalyzes glutamine-dependent anthranilate synthesis. The second activity, PR-anthranilate synthesis, is performed by the phosphoribosyl transferase subunit (TrpD). Gln, glutamine; Glu, glutamate; Pyr, pyruvate. (B) Reactions catalyzed by the bifunctional enzyme TrpC. The carboxy-terminal domain catalyzes the isomerization of PR-anthranilate to CdRP. The amino-terminal domain catalyzes the decarboxylation of CdRP to indole-3-glycerol-phosphate. PR-Ant, PR-anthranilate; InGP, indole-3-glycerol-phosphate.
|
-helices (26). This study was initiated to better understand the contribution of AS-PRT to PRA formation relevant in vivo. Characterization of PRA formation in vitro with purified proteins led to the identification of PRA formation in vivo that was dependent on both the TrpDE complex and the status of flux through the tryptophan biosynthetic pathway. Thus, this study describes a mechanism by which the activity of the AS-PRT enzyme can contribute to PRA production in the cell in a flux-dependent manner.
|
|
|---|
Bacterial strains.
All strains used in this study are derivatives of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium strain LT2 and are listed with their genotypes in Table 1. Tn10d(Tc) refers to the transposition-defective mini-Tn10 (Tn10
16
17) (32).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Bacterial strains and plasmids
|
Strain constructions.
trp mutants were isolated as follows. A P22 lysate grown on wild-type strain DM1, previously treated with diethylsulfate, was used to transduce strain DM6806 [purF2085 gnd-181 trp::Tn10d(Tc)] to Trp+ on minimal medium with adenine and thiamine. Trp+ transductants were screened for their abilities to grow on minimal adenine medium. All putative Trp+ Thi+ mutants were reconstructed by transduction into strain DM8916 (purF2085 gnd-181
trpEDCBA) prior to further characterization. An isogenic strain carrying a wild-type trp operon was generated by transducing DM8916 to Trp+ with a lysate grown on a wild-type donor strain (DM1).
Phenotypic analysis. (i) Liquid growth. Strains to be analyzed were grown to full density in nutrient medium at 37°C. After overnight incubation, cells were pelleted and resuspended in an equal volume of saline (85 mM). A 50-µl sample of this suspension was used to inoculate 5 ml of the appropriate medium. Culture tubes were incubated at 37°C with shaking, and growth was monitored as optical density at 650 nm on a Bausch and Lomb Spectronic 20D apparatus. Alternatively, 2 µl of the cell suspension was used to inoculate 200 µl of the appropriate medium contained in each well of a 96-well microtiter plate. Growth at 37°C was monitored using a microplate spectrophotometer Spectra-Max Plus. The specific growth rate was determined as µ = ln(X/X0)/T, where X is the A650 value during the linear portion of the growth curve and T is time in hours.
(ii) Solid media. Nutritional requirements were measured by growing the strains on rich agar medium and replica plating them to minimal agar medium containing the appropriate nutrients. Growth was assessed after 24 h of incubation at 37°C. Cross-feeding was measured by spotting relevant samples (cells or supernatants) on a soft agar overlay seeded with a strain containing trpE8 (old designation, trpA8 [3]; kindly provided by J. Roth).
(iii) Plasmid constructs.
Genomic DNA from strain DM6418 [purF2085 gnd-181 zdd-9147::Tn10d(Tc)] was purified from bacterial cells by using an Easy-DNA kit (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA). Cloned Pfu DNA polymerase from Pyrococcus furiosus (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) was used in PCRs. The PCR fragment corresponding to the trpD (1,610-bp) gene was gel purified, digested with the appropriate restriction enzymes, and cloned into the expression vector pET-28a (Novagen, Darmstadt, Germany). The ligation mix was transformed into Escherichia coli strain DH5
, and DNA sequencing (University of Wisconsin Biotechnology Center, Nucleic Acid and Protein Facility) was used to verify the plasmid constructs.
(iv) Purification of TrpD enzyme.
An expression vector containing the trpD gene under the control of the T7 promoter (pET-trpD) was freshly transformed into Escherichia coli BL21. Overnight cultures were used to inoculate Luria-Bertani (LB) broth supplemented with 50 µg/ml kanamycin, and the cultures were grown to an optical density at 650 nm of 0.6 at 37°C. The cells were cooled to 30°C and then induced with 1.0 mM isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG). The cells were grown for an additional 5 h at 30°C, harvested, and resuspended in binding buffer (5 mM imidazole, 0.5 M NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.9]). All subsequent purification steps were performed at 4°C. Cells were disrupted using a French pressure cell at 104 kPa, followed by brief sonication using a Sonic Dismembrator 550 (Fisher Scientific). Clarified cell extract was obtained by centrifugation at 23,700 x g for 45 min at 4°C. The supernatant was filtered and loaded onto a 10-ml Ni-His bind resin column equilibrated with binding buffer. Unbound proteins were washed from the resin with 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.9), 6 mM imidazole, 0.5 M NaCl. A linear gradient from 0.02 to 1 M imidazole was used to elute the recombinant protein. TrpD eluted at
0.3 M imidazole. Fractions containing the eluted enzyme were assayed for activity, dialyzed overnight against PED buffer (50 mM potassium phosphate [pH 7.5], 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.2 mM dithiothreitol) containing 20% glycerol and stored at –80°C. Proteins were purified to >95% purity, as judged by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis with the yield from a typical purification of 100 mg of purified protein per 4 liters of culture.
Enzyme assays. Phosphoribosyltransferase activity was assayed fluorometrically (12, 13) by measuring the rate of disappearance of anthranilate at 25°C. The reaction mixture contained 15 µM anthranilate, 0.3 mM PRPP, 10 mM MgCl2, 100 mM Tricine buffer (pH 7.6), and 0.625 µg of purified enzyme (TrpD) in a final volume of 200 µl. Anthranilate was detected by fluorescence at 325-nm excitation and 400-nm emission wavelengths.
Phosphoribosylamine-forming activity was determined using a modified assay initially described for PurF (17, 29). Synthesis of PRA from PRPP and ammonium was determined as a function of [1-14C]glycinamide ribonucleotide ([1-14C]GAR) produced in a coupled reaction catalyzed by GAR synthetase (PurD) enzyme (Fig. 2B). A molecule of [1-14C]glycine is condensed with PRA to yield GAR. The reactions were performed in 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 8.0) in the presence of 10 mM PRPP, 6 mM Mg(Ac)2, 2.5 mM ATP, 25 mM [14C]glycine (26 nCi), 10 mM NH4Cl, 2 µg of GAR synthetase. PurD was overexpressed and purified as previously described (27). In a standard assay, reactions were started by the addition of 5 to 10 µg of purified TrpD, followed by incubation at 37°C for 1 h. Various changes to this protocol are noted in the text as relevant for each experiment. Labeled GAR and glycine were separated by thin-layer chromatography on PEI-cellulose by using a methanol-pyridine-water system (20:1:5) determined experimentally. The position of radioactive spots was detected using a Cyclone storage phosphor system (Packard Instrument Company), and their identities were confirmed with known standards.
![]() View larger version (27K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. [14C]GAR formation in the presence of TrpD enzyme requires anthranilate. (A) Reactions were performed in 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 8.0) in the presence of 150 µM anthranilate (when added), 10 mM PRPP, 10 mM NH3, 6 mM Mg(Ac)2, 2.5 mM ATP, 25 mM [14C]glycine (26 nCi), and 2 µg of GAR synthetase. Reactions were started by the addition of 5 µg of TrpD enzyme, followed by incubation at 37°C for 1 h. Labeled GAR and glycine were separated on PEI-cellulose by using a methanol-pyridine-water (20:1:5) solvent system. +, addition; –, no addition, with visualization using a Cyclone storage phosphor system. (B) A schematic of the coupled assay used to detect PRA formation is shown.
|
BC, where A is the A280 for Ls, Ls is A330 x 1.929,
is the molar extinction coefficient of the pure protein, and C is the protein concentration in moles/liter. Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was performed by the method of Laemmli (16), and protein bands were visualized after staining them with ethanol-water-acetic acid-Coomassie G-250 (40:55:5:0.05) and destained in ethanol-water-acetic acid (40:55:5). |
|
|---|
PRA formation in the presence of anthranilate is nonenzymatic. Synthesis of PRA by TrpD was monitored as a function of anthranilate (0 to 150 µM) on the basis of the level of radiolabeled GAR ([1-14C]GAR) detected. Data in Fig. 3 showed that the amount of GAR produced was proportional to the concentration of anthranilate up to 75 µM, where there was a plateau of product formation. The final concentration of GAR, as estimated from a linear curve generated with precursor glycine, was approximately twice the amount of anthranilate added. This result suggested that anthranilate (or a derivative) was allowing PRA synthesis but was not participating as a substrate in the reaction.
![]() View larger version (13K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. GAR synthesis versus anthranilate concentration. Production of GAR by wild-type TrpD was determined in the presence of increasing concentrations of anthranilate. The assay was performed as described in Materials and Methods in the presence of 10 mM PRPP and 10 mM NH3. Reactions were started by the addition of 5 µg of the TrpD enzyme, followed by incubation at 37°C for 1 h. The data represent averages for duplicate experiments, and detected [14C]GAR was quantified in phosphorimager (PI) units.
|
![]() View larger version (22K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Degradation of PR-anthranilate. The phosphorybosyl transferase activity of TrpD was assayed as described in Materials and Methods in the presence of 1 mM PRPP, 1 mM anthranilate, and 0.3 µg of TrpD enzyme. Disappearance of anthranilate was followed fluorometrically (excitation wavelength, 325 nm; emission, 400 nm) in the presence ( ) or absence ( ) of TrpD.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Nonenzymatic formation of PRAa
|
![]() View larger version (14K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Nonenzymatic PRA synthesis from NH3 and R5P in the presence of TrpD. R5P released from the degradation of PR-anthranilate (PR-Ant) formed by TrpD reacts nonenzymatically with NH3 to produce PRA. Ant., anthranilate; PR-Ant., phosphoribosyl-anthranilate.
|
![]() View larger version (14K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Metabolite accumulation allows PRA formation in vivo. Strains were grown in minimal medium supplemented with adenine and tryptophan. , DM9784 (purF2085 gnd-181); , DM9719 (purF2085 gnd-181 trpR3614 trpE3613 trpC::Tn10). Addition of thiamine restores growth of DM9784 ( ). Data shown are averages for two independent cultures, with error bars indicated.
|
Mutations in trpC allow PRA synthesis. The region between the trpH and trpC genes was PCR amplified and sequenced from each of the mutants. (The trpH gene is upstream and divergently transcribed with respect to the trp operon.) Six of the mutations allowing PRA synthesis were in trpC, and one was in trpE. Due to their prevalence, the trpC alleles were analyzed further. The causative lesion in each mutant strain is described in Table 3. All six mutations mapped to the PR-AnI domain of the bifunctional enzyme. The isomerase reaction is the first of the two sequential reactions catalyzed by TrpC. Two of the mutant enzymes [TrpC(A405T) and TrpC(G435D)] contained changes in conserved residues of the PR-AnI active site, as determined by amino acid sequence alignments of the PR-AnI domains of 10 different microorganisms (26). One mutation introduced an amber codon resulting in a TrpC enzyme with a predicted truncation of the PR-AnI domain [TrpC(G339Ter)]. The amino acid change in TrpC(G255D) affected a residue that serves as a bridge between the PR-AnI and the IGPS domains in E. coli and S. enterica TrpC (26). The locations of these mutations in the three-dimensional structure of the protein are illustrated in Fig. 7.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Mutations and amino acid changes that allow PurF-independent PRA synthesis
|
![]() View larger version (45K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Three-dimensional localization of mutations restoring PRA synthesis. The structure of PR-AnI-IGPS (TrpC) (26) is shown. Residue changes are indicated in different colors. The region presumed to be predominately truncated in TrpC(G339Ter) is shown in yellow, starting with residue G339 in pink. The locations of the active sites of the PR-AnI and IGPS domains are indicated by I and S, respectively. Structural depictions were generated using PyMOL software version 0.99 (PyMOL, LLC).
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 4. Mutations in the tryptophan operon restore thiamine-independent growth
|
![]() View larger version (99K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 8. Anthranilate excretion by trpC mutants. Feeding experiments were performed as described in Materials and Methods. The indicator strain trpE8 was seeded as an overlay on minimal medium plates supplemented with adenine and thiamine. Indicated mutant strains were stabbed into the agar lawn from overnight cultures. Mutant strains used were DM7870 (purF2085 gnd-181 trpC3626), 7863 (purF2085 gnd-181 trpC3620), 7865 (purF2085 gnd-181 trpC3621), 7869 (purF2085 gnd-181 trpC3624), and 7868 (purF2085 gnd-181 trpC3623). Strain DM9784 (purF2085 gnd-181) is the parental control, and the only growth seen is of the strain itself. Plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 h.
|
|
|
|---|
The in vitro system described herein serendipitously allowed the generation (and detection) of PRA that was formed nonenzymatically from R5P and NH3. Manipulation of the assay system allowed the conclusion that the TrpD enzyme mediated the conversion of PRPP to R5P through a PR-anthranilate intermediate (Fig. 6). Thus, in this isolated system, the critical product of the TrpD reaction was R5P, generated by breakdown of the unstable PR-anthranilate. The R5P then condensed with NH3 present to generate PRA. It is important to note that these results did not address the possibility that TrpD can enzymatically generate PRA under some condition(s).
The instability of PR-anthranilate has been previously described (7). However, a role for the breakdown products in metabolism had not been considered, since the subsequent enzyme in the pathway (TrpC) would be expected to remove this metabolite before breakdown. The potential contribution of nonenzymatic formation of PRA to thiamine synthesis in vivo was explored genetically. Interruption of the trpC gene allowed thiamine-independent growth in the absence of PurF. However, while producing a positive result, this was a harsh test of this hypothesis since it restored one pathway (thiamine) at the expense of another (tryptophan). The isolation of mutations in trpC that did not compromise the ability of the cell to grow in the absence of tryptophan but allowed growth without thiamine (in cells lacking purF) confirmed a physiological potential for nonenzymatic PRA formation. Cross-feeding studies detected the expected excretion of anthranilate, making all data consistent with accumulation of PR-anthranilate being indirectly responsible for thiamine synthesis in these strains. These data allow the conclusion that R5P is the limiting metabolite for nonenzymatic formation of PRA in vivo, at least in the medium used. This conclusion explains why no mutations that prevent PurF-independent thiamine synthesis when cells are grown on ribose have been isolated. Use of ribose as a sole carbon source would be expected to elevate R5P levels.
Five of the trpC mutations restoring PRA synthesis affected residues in the PR-AnI domain and one mutation affected the single amino acid that serves as a bridge between the two domains. The diversity of mutations that resulted in similar phenotypes upon distinct alteration of the TrpC enzyme yet failed to compromise tryptophan-independent growth was unexpected. The presence of one mutation that generated a termination codon was noteworthy since activity sufficient for tryptophan biosynthesis was maintained. It seems likely that low levels of read-through of the UAG codon produced enough functional TrpC to allow synthesis of tryptophan. It was telling that each of the randomly generated mutations that survived the selection mapped to the isomerase domain of the protein. This activity is the first of the two sequential reactions that the enzyme catalyzes in tryptophan biosynthesis and significantly is the one that acts on PR-anthranilate. This result emphasized the need for the specific accumulation of PR-anthranilate.
In a global context, this work illustrates several points. First, the potential for nonenzymatic synthesis of key metabolites is demonstrated. Strains in which thiamine synthesis depended on the nonenzymatic formation of an intermediate were generated. No significant growth defect resulted in these strains, indicating that all essential metabolic processes were functioning at a capacity that allowed growth on minimal medium. A second point of note was the ease with which subtle changes in enzyme kinetics appeared to alter the metabolic network. This work suggests that even in highly conserved proteins, key residues involved in catalysis are not the only critical feature to be maintained. Finally, this work demonstrates that changes in a protein can alter metabolic flux in a way that has a global impact on metabolism yet cannot be predicted or in fact measured if only one output is monitored. As such, protein variants should be considered to be optimized for function in the native metabolic network. If this view is correct, it has implications for evaluating essential residues and protein evolution in the context of a single activity or pathway. Rather, analysis of the relevant network and its conservation in different organisms may provide a better understanding of the forces at work to constrain and define metabolism and allow for the critical inherent robustness.
We thank Beth Ann Browne for helpful discussions and J. R. Roth for providing the trpE mutant strain.
Published ahead of print on 8 June 2007. ![]()
Present address: Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139. ![]()
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»