Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, March 2008, p. 1838-1842, Vol. 190, No. 5
0021-9193/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JB.01551-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, East Carolina University School of Medicine, Greenville, North Carolina 27834
Received 26 September 2007/ Accepted 11 December 2007
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
While insufficient iron can restrict bacterial growth, excess intracellular iron can result in the formation of damaging hydroxyl radicals via Fenton chemistry and thus be toxic (28). For this reason, the uptake of iron into both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells is tightly regulated to maintain an ideal balance between meeting the cells' physiological needs and avoiding excess (2, 10). Most bacteria rely on the ferric iron uptake regulator (Fur) or a transcriptional repressor with Fur-like properties to regulate siderophore production and uptake (9, 12).
In some bacteria, a second level of regulation of siderophore biosynthesis is mediated by AraC-like transcriptional activators that use the end product siderophore as a coactivator for induction of the siderophore biosynthesis genes as well as the genes required for siderophore uptake. Members of this regulator family include the AlcR, PchR, YbtA, and RhrA proteins of Bordetella bronchiseptica, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Yersinia pestis, and Sinorhizobium meliloti, respectively (4, 14, 18, 22, 29). It has been postulated that these transcriptional regulators allow bacteria to fine-tune the expression of siderophore biosynthesis and transport genes in such a manner that maximum expression of these genes occurs only in environments where the corresponding ferrisiderophore complex can serve as an efficient iron source (7). The gene annotated as BAB2_1152 in the B. abortus 2308 genome sequence is predicted to encode a 259-amino-acid protein that exhibits significant amino acid sequence homology with AlcR (18.8% identity, 30.6% similarity), RhrA (17.1% identity, 28.6% similarity), PchR (14.8% identity, 31.6% similarity), and YbtA (12.5% identity, 23.7% similarity). Unlike the genes encoding these other AraC-like transcriptional activators, however, BAB2_1152 is found at a chromosomal location distal to the genes involved in 2,3-DHBA and brucebactin biosynthesis in B. abortus 2308 (BAB2_0011-BAB2_0016).
To determine if the product of BAB2_1152 plays a role in regulating siderophore production by B. abortus 2308, the corresponding genetic locus was disrupted in this strain by using a previously described strategy (11). Two separate regions of 685 and 929 bp flanking the BAB2_1152 open reading frame in the B. abortus 2308 genome were amplified by PCR (upstream forward primer, 5'-AACAACTCGGAAACGTTGGCAGGTTGCAGCTT-3'; upstream reverse primer, 5'-CCATCGATAATATCATCAGCATCAGCTTCGGAAA-3'; downstream forward primer, 5'-CCATCGATCGTTCCGCAAGCTCTATGGATTTTCA-3'; downstream reverse primer, 5'-CCGCATCGACGTTCTTGCTTTTGATCTGT-3'). A ClaI restriction site was added to the 3' end of the upstream 685-bp fragment and the 5' end of the 929-bp downstream fragment as shown in Fig. 1. Each PCR product was individually ligated into pGEM-T Easy (Promega), resulting in the construction of plasmids pdhbR1 and pdhbR2, respectively. The upstream fragment was subsequently excised from pdhbR1 as an NcoI/ClaI fragment and ligated into ClaI/NcoI-digested pdhbR2, producing plasmid pdhbR1-2. Following the linearization of pdhbR1-2 with ClaI, the linearized plasmid was treated with the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase I and ligated with the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (cat) gene from pBlue-Cm2 (30). This plasmid was introduced into B. abortus 2308 by electroporation, and transformants were selected on Schaedler agar supplemented with 5% defibrinated bovine blood containing 5 µg/µl chloramphenicol. The genotype of the resulting B. abortus mutant designated BEA6 was confirmed by PCR analysis of genomic DNA from this strain using BAB2_1152-, cat-, and pGEM-specific primer sets. Crystal violet exclusion was used to verify that BEA6 retained its smooth lipopolysaccharide phenotype (1).
![]() View larger version (29K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Genetic organization of the BAB2_1150-BAB2_1153 locus in B. abortus 2308. BAB2_1150 encodes a TonB-dependent outer membrane protein (BhuA) that is involved in heme transport (26), BAB2_1151 is predicted to encode a hypothetical protein, and BAB2_1153 is predicted to encode a homolog of LivK, a periplasmic protein involved in branched-chain amino acid transport in Escherichia coli and other bacteria. The black bars above the locus represent the upstream and downstream regions flanking the cat gene in the mutated BAB2_1152 locus in B. abortus BEA6. The transcriptional start for the BAB2_1152 gene (dhbR) is noted by +1, the corresponding G is shown in boldface and is underlined, and the –10 and –35 regions relative to the transcriptional site are also shown. A putative ribosome binding site and the assigned ATG start codon for the dhbR coding region (BAB2_1152) are shown in boldface and italics and in boldface and underlined, respectively.
|
![]() View larger version (37K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. DhbR is required for maximal siderophore production (A) and dhbCEBA transcription (B) by B. abortus 2308 in response to iron limitation. B. abortus strains 2308, BEA6 (2308 dhbR), BEA6.C [BEA6(pEA17)], and BHB2 (2308 dhbC) were grown in 100 ml low-iron minimal medium (hatched bars) or low-iron minimal medium supplemented with 50 µM FeCl3 (black bars) in 500-ml flasks at 37°C with shaking. (A) Following 48 h of cultivation in these media, samples of the supernatants of these cultures were evaluated for the presence of siderophores using the Arnow assay (3). (B) β-Galactosidase production in Miller units (24) by derivatives of B. abortus 2308, BEA6, BEA6.D4 [BEA6(pEAD4)], and BHB2 carrying plasmid pPdhbC::lacZ (6) following 48 h of growth under the same cultural conditions is also shown. The results presented are from single experiments that are representative of multiple (three or more) experiments performed for each analysis from which equivalent results were obtained. *, significance at a P of <0.05 for comparisons of BEA6 or BHB2 versus 2308, BEA6.C, or BEA6.D4 in a two-tailed Student t test.
|
AlcR, PchR, YbtA, and RhrA require the end products of the siderophore biosynthesis genes they regulate as coinducers in order to function efficiently as transcriptional activators (7, 19, 22, 27). To determine if this same relationship holds true for the Brucella DhbR, the levels of dhbC expression in B. abortus 2308 and the dhbR mutant BEA6 in response to iron deprivation were compared to the levels of dhbC expression in response to iron limitation in B. abortus BHB2 (2308 dhbC), an isogenic mutant that cannot produce 2,3-DHBA or brucebactin (6). As shown in Fig. 2B, the B. abortus dhbR and dhbC mutants displayed levels of reduction in dhbC expression in response to iron limitation equivalent to those of the parental 2308 strain exposed to the same conditions, which suggests that DhbR requires 2,3-DHBA or brucebactin as a coinducer in order to serve as an efficient transcriptional activator for the dhbCEBA operon in B. abortus 2308.
To determine if DhbR binds directly to the dhbC promoter in B. abortus 2308, a DhbR-maltose-binding protein (MBP) fusion protein was generated, and the interactions of the fusion protein with a DNA fragment corresponding to the dhbC promoter region were examined in an electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA). The dhbR coding region was amplified from B. abortus 2308 genomic DNA by PCR (primer Fwd, 5'-ATGCTGATGATATTCTTTCA-3'; primer Rev, 5'-ACCGGAACCGCTCCGGCAGAGGATCC-3') using high-fidelity Pfu polymerase (Stratagene) and cloned into XmnI/BamHI-digested pMal-c2X. The resulting plasmid encodes a fusion protein comprised of the first 411 amino acids of MalE fused to the N terminus of DhbR. Confirmation of the malE-dhbR fusion in this plasmid was accomplished by PCR amplification of the dhbR gene using plasmid DNA as a template. Purification of the MalE-DhbR fusion peptide was performed on an amylose resin column following the manufacturer's instructions. For the EMSAs, a 298-bp DNA fragment encompassing the dhb promoter region (6) was amplified from B. abortus 2308 genomic DNA (forward primer, 5'-CGGCATCCAGCCATCTGCAAAA-3'; reverse primer, 5'-ATCACCTCACGCATGCCGCT-3') and radiolabeled with [33P]dATP using the following procedures. Briefly, 21 µl of purified PCR fragment (100 ng/µl) was added to 3 µl of Taq polymerase 10x reaction buffer, 10 µCi [33P]dATP, 10 units of Taq DNA polymerase, and 3 µl of double-distilled water. This mixture was incubated at 70°C for 30 min, unincorporated radiolabeled nucleotide was removed from the fragment using the QIAquick nucleotide removal kit (Qiagen), and the fragment was suspended in 30 µl double-distilled water. Binding of the MalE-DhbR fusion protein to the radiolabeled DNA fragment was measured by mixing 2, 5, or 10 µg purified MBP-DhbR protein with 0.125 µg radiolabeled dhbR promoter fragment, 2 µg sheared herring sperm DNA, 10 µg bovine serum albumin, and 12 µl of 5x binding buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 200 mM NaCl, 20 mM MgCl2, 20% glycerol). This mixture was incubated for 20 min at room temperature and then loaded onto an 8% nondenaturing acrylamide gel and subjected to electrophoresis at 200 V. The contents of the gel were transferred to a piece of Whatman 1 M filter paper, dried, and visualized by autoradiography. To evaluate the specificity of the interactions between the MalE-DhbR fusion protein and the radiolabeled DNA fragment, an unlabeled version of this fragment was used as a specific inhibitor and a 278-bp SacI/SapI fragment from pBlueCM2 was used as a nonspecific inhibitor.
Numerous attempts to cleave DhbR from the MBP resulted in denaturation of the DhbR protein, which led to its precipitation out of solution. Because of this, the fusion protein was evaluated for binding in its uncleaved form in the EMSA. Increasing concentrations of the DhbR-MBP fusion protein retarded the migration of the labeled dhb promoter fragment into the gel (Fig. 3, lanes 2 and 3) in this assay, and this mobility shift was abolished by the addition of a 50-fold excess of unlabeled dhbC promoter DNA (Fig. 3, lane 4) but not by the addition of a 50-fold excess of nonspecific competitor DNA (Fig. 3, lane 5). In contrast, no evidence for specific interactions between the unfused MBP and the DNA fragment corresponding to the dhbC promoter region was obtained in this assay (Fig. 3, lane 6). These results demonstrate a direct and specific interaction between the DhbR component of the DhbR-MBP fusion protein and the dhbC promoter region of B. abortus 2308, which is consistent with the proposed function of DhbR as a transcriptional activator. Preliminary studies indicate that the presence of 2,3-DHBA does not alter the binding affinity of DhbR for the dhbC promoter region in the EMSA (data not shown). This suggests that brucebactin may serve as the coactivator for DhbR, but the instability of this siderophore (16) has to date prevented a definitive evaluation of the interactions between brucebactin and DhbR in the EMSA.
![]() View larger version (97K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. DhbR binds to the dhbCEBA promoter region in B. abortus 2308 in an EMSA. Lane 1, 0.125 µg 33P-labeled dhbC promoter-specific DNA fragment; lane 2, 0.125 µg 33P-labeled dhbC promoter-specific DNA fragment plus 2 µg MBP-DhbR fusion protein; lane 3, 0.125 µg 33P-labeled dhbC promoter-specific DNA fragment plus 10 µg MBP-DhbR fusion protein; lane 4, 0.125 µg 33P-labeled dhbC-promoter-specific DNA fragment plus 2 µg MBP-DhbR fusion protein plus 6.25 µg unlabeled dhbC promoter-specific DNA fragment; lane 5, 0.125 µg 33P-labeled dhbC promoter-specific DNA fragment plus 2 µg MBP-DhbR fusion protein plus 6.25 µg unlabeled nonspecific competitor DNA; lane 6, 0.125 µg 33P-labeled dhbC promoter-specific DNA fragment plus 2 µg unfused MBP. The results presented are from a single experiment that is representative of multiple (three or more) experiments performed from which equivalent results were obtained.
|
The studies presented in this report demonstrate that DhbR is required for maximal expression of the 2,3-DHBA biosynthetic genes in B. abortus 2308 in response to iron limitation and suggest that 2,3-DHBA and/or brucebactin serves as a coinducer(s) for this transcriptional activator. Based on the regulatory activity of DhbR homologs in other bacteria, it will also be important to determine if DhbR regulates the expression of the genes involved in the conversion of 2,3-DHBA to brucebactin (6, 16) and/or the transport systems for these siderophores in Brucella spp. (32). The genomic location of the dhbR gene in B. abortus 2308, B. abortus 9-941, Brucella melitensis 16 M, and Brucella suis 1330 is unique compared to that of its counterparts in Bordetella, Yersinia, Pseudomonas, and Sinorhizobium spp. in that dhbR is not located contiguous with genes involved in siderophore biosynthesis or transport. In fact, in all four of the Brucella strains for which the genome sequence is available, dhbR resides next to a gene that has recently been linked to the utilization of heme as an iron source (26). Consequently, in order for us to gain a clearer picture of the role of DhbR in iron metabolism in Brucella spp., it will be important to determine if this regulator controls the expression of genes other than those responsible for siderophore biosynthesis and transport. An evaluation of the virulence properties of Brucella dhbR mutants will also tell us whether DhbR-mediated regulation of siderophore biosynthesis and transport and possibly other iron metabolism genes are important for the prioritization of iron source utilization by these bacteria in their mammalian hosts.
Published ahead of print on 21 December 2007. ![]()
|
|
|---|
-proteobacteria. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2:e163.[CrossRef][Medline]
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»