Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, March 2008, p. 2118-2127, Vol. 190, No. 6
0021-9193/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JB.01858-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Division of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California 92350
Received 26 November 2007/ Accepted 9 January 2008
|
|
|---|
-helices separated by a structured loop. The proximal signaling domain consisted of two
-helices separated by a short undetermined structure. The Af1503 HAMP domain from Archaeoglobus fulgidus was recently shown to be a four-helix bundle. To test whether the Af1503 HAMP domain is a prototype for the Aer HAMP domain, the latter was modeled using coordinates from Af1503. Several findings supported the hypothesis that Aer has a four-helix HAMP structure: (i) cross-linking independently identified the same residues at the dimer interface that were predicted by the model, (ii) the rate of cross-linking for residue pairs was inversely proportional to the β-carbon distances measured on the model, and (iii) clockwise lesions that were not contiguous in the linear Aer sequence were clustered in one region in the folded HAMP model, defining a potential site of PAS-HAMP interaction during signaling. In silico modeling of mutant Aer proteins indicated that the four-helix HAMP structure was important for Aer stability or maturation. The significance of the HAMP and proximal signaling domain structure for signal transduction is discussed. |
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (33K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Domain map of Aer (left panel) and projected detail of the region scanned by cysteine in this study (right panel). Also indicated are substitutions between residues 210 and 258 that cause CW bias and null aerotaxis phenotypes (13, 43, 62; this study) (only null mutants that are not phenotypically rescued by other chemoreceptors are included). The null lesions were subsequently modeled in silico (see text for details); substitutions that were not permissible in PyMOL (italics) or caused structural defects when they were remodeled in Swiss-Model (underlined) are shown. TM, transmembrane; Sig., signaling.
|
Whichever PAS signaling mechanism is employed by Aer, the signal must ultimately be transduced to the HAMP domain. PAS and HAMP domains are present together in approximately 800 proteins from archaea, bacteria, and eukaryotes, most of which are putative or known histidine kinases or chemoreceptors (SMART; http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/). HAMP domains consist of two amphipathic
-helices (AS-1 and AS-2) connected by a loop. This structure was first predicted by Le Moual and Koshland (42) and has since been supported by disulfide cross-linking of the Salmonella Tar HAMP domain (14) and by electron paramagnetic resonance measurements of the Natronomonas pharaonis HtrII HAMP domain (10). The recent nuclear magnetic resonance-derived structure of an Af1503 HAMP dimer from the archaeon Archaeoglobus fulgidus revealed a parallel four-helix coiled-coil arrangement for AS-1 and AS-2, with each connector packed into a groove between helices (36). Residues comprising the helical core of the HAMP domain were hydrophobic, as expected, although they were packed in an unusual knob-to-knob arrangement rather than the knob-into-hole conformation that is more commonly observed in coiled coils (36). The knob-to-knob arrangement could be converted in silico into the nearly isoenergetic knob-into-hole conformation by a 26° rotation of the helices, which led the authors to propose that helical rotation is the signaling mechanism of HAMP domains (36). However, it is unclear whether the Af1503 HAMP domain should be used as a prototype for other HAMP-containing proteins because it contains no kinase or signaling domain and could therefore be a nonfunctional, evolutionary remnant of another pathway. If HAMP domains do signal by rotation, it is not obvious how different signals, such as the downward piston motion of TM2 in chemoreceptors or the lateral signal from the PAS domain of Aer, could contribute to HAMP rotation. To continue our exploration of signal transduction in Aer, we probed the structure of the Aer HAMP and proximal signaling domains by in vivo disulfide cross-linking and compared the results with structures from the same regions of Af1503 and Tar. Our data supported the proposed structure of a HAMP domain and suggested that the HAMP structure is conserved in functionally distinct proteins. In addition, lesions that promote the signal-on state of Aer clustered in one region of an in silico Aer HAMP model, defining a possible PAS interaction surface that may be important for PAS-HAMP signaling.
|
|
|---|
aer-1
tsr-7028) (56), BT3400 (
aer-1
tsr-7028 recA::cat) (61), and BT3388 (
aer::erm
tsr-7021
tar-tap-5201 trg::Tn10) (64) were used in this study. These strains are derivatives of RP437, an E. coli strain that is wild type for chemotaxis (53). The pDS7 plasmid expresses wild-type Aer from pACYC184 (17) using a tightly regulated sodium salicylate-inducible promoter (pnahG) (61). This plasmid also contains a p15A replication origin, allowing coexpression of genes with pTrc99A-derived plasmids. Plasmid pMB1 (44, 63) is a derivative of pGH1 that expresses cysteineless (C-less) Aer (Aer-C193S/C203A/C253A). Both pMB1 and pGH1 (wild-type Aer [55]) are derivatives of pTrc99A that express Aer under the control of an isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG)-inducible ptrc promoter.
Site-directed mutagenesis. Site-directed cysteine mutagenesis (Aer residues 210 to 290) was performed according to the instructions of a QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) using pMB1 as the template. Aer expression was confirmed by Western blot analysis using anti-Aer2-166 antisera (56), and the expected mutations were confirmed by DNA sequencing.
Mutant characterization. Aerotaxis phenotypes for each of the BT3312 Aer cysteine mutants were determined at 30°C in minimal soft agar (59) containing 30 mM succinate, 50 µg ml–1 ampicillin, and 0 to 1,000 µM IPTG. Nonaerotactic mutants were examined to determine their responses to oxygen in a gas perfusion chamber after induction with 200 µM or 1 mM IPTG as described previously (55, 59, 63). Aerotaxis phenotypes for the BT3388 Aer cysteine mutants were determined at 30°C in tryptone soft agar (59) containing 50 µg ml–1 ampicillin and 20 to 1,000 µM IPTG.
To test for dominant or recessive behavior, BT3400 cells were cotransformed with pDS7 and the relevant pMB1-derived construct. Cotransformants were selected on LB agar containing 100 µg ml–1 ampicillin and 15 µg ml–1 tetracycline and then transferred to minimal soft agar containing 30 mM succinate, 50 µg ml–1 ampicillin, and 7.5 µg ml–1 tetracycline. Sodium salicylate (0.5 or 1 µM) and IPTG (between 0 and 0.6 mM) were also included in the semisoft agar in a series of titrations to vary gene expression levels. Actual expression levels were determined by Western blotting. The relevant constructs were also introduced individually into BT3400 and tested under the various conditions.
In vivo cross-linking. BT3312 cells expressing individual Aer cysteine mutants were grown in H1 minimal salts medium supplemented with 30 mM succinate, 0.1% Casamino Acids, and 100 µg ml–1 ampicillin. Mid-log-phase cultures were induced for 3 h with 50 µM IPTG. Cross-linking was then performed at 25°C by exposing whole cells to 300 µM copper phenanthroline (CuPhe) for various time intervals (0, 1, 2, 5, 10, or 15 min), as described previously (5, 35, 44, 59). Western blots of cross-linked products were quantified using an Alpha Innotech digital imaging system. The percentage of cross-linking was calculated by dividing the intensity of the cross-linked dimer band by the sum of the intensities of the monomer and dimer bands and multiplying the result by 100. BT3312/pGH1 and BT3312/pMB1 were used as positive and negative cross-linking controls, respectively (44). Mid-log-phase cultures, induced with 50 µM IPTG, were also used to determine the steady-state cellular level of each mutant Aer protein. Cellular levels were inferred by measuring band intensities on Western blots and then comparing these intensities with the steady-state levels of C-less (pMB1) and wild-type (pGH1) Aer.
In silico modeling. Homology models of wild-type and mutant Aer HAMP domains were created with the DeepView/Swiss-Model package (http://www.expasy.org/spdbv/, http://swissmodel.expasy.org/) using the coordinates of the A. fulgidus Af1503 HAMP domain and the sequence of the E. coli Aer HAMP domain. The stereochemical quality of the models was verified using WHAT IF (http://swift.cmbi.kun.nl/whatif/). PyMOL (http://pymol.sourceforge.net/) was used to view models, measure β-carbon distances, and "mutate" amino acid side chains. When side chains were mutated in PyMOL, all possible rotamers were sampled. β-Carbon distances were measured using a method analogous to that described by Careaga et al. (16). For glycines, which lack a β-carbon, side chains were mutated to cysteine and measured.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (53K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Influence of cysteine substitutions on Aer-mediated behavior. Plasmid-borne Aer mutants were tested in E. coli BT3312 (aer tsr). Colonies were transferred to succinate minimal soft agar containing 50 µg ml–1 ampicillin and then incubated at 30°C for 18 to 19 h and compared with positive (wild-type Aer, C-less Aer [Aer-C193S/C203A/C253A]) and negative (pTrc99A vector) aerotaxis controls. (A) Representative Aer mutants with different colony phenotypes in soft agar, as follows: normal, Aer-V230C and Aer-N234C; large translucent zone, Aer-P211C (see text for details); superswarming, Aer-V222C; impaired function, Aer-S261C; and nonaerotactic, Aer-W255C, Aer-L256C, and Aer-Q263C. (B) Swarm rates for Aer mutants expressed as percentages of the wild-type Aer (pGH1) swarm rate. Residue numbers indicate the position of each cysteine substitution in the Aer protein. Mutants whose average colony expansion rate was more than 130% of the wild-type Aer rate were designated superswarming mutants, whereas mutants whose average colony expansion rate was less than 40% of the wild-type rate were either nonaerotactic (indicated by an asterisk) or had impaired function. C-less Aer and the vector control are indicated by a gray square and circle, respectively. WT, wild-type.
|
Steady-state protein levels. Since Aer HAMP mutants often produce unstable proteins (13, 43), the cellular steady-state level of each cysteine mutant protein was measured after induction with 50 µM IPTG and compared with the level of C-less Aer. After induction with 50 µM IPTG, the steady-state level of C-less Aer was similar to the level of wild-type Aer (pGH1), which was approximately 50-fold higher than the chromosomal Aer expression level (and approximated the number of all other chemoreceptors in the cell). The steady-state levels of 4 of the 80 mutants were less than 60% of the C-less Aer level (Fig. 3A). These mutants were the P211C, R235C, G240C, and G277C mutants. Of these, the steady-state levels of Aer-P211C and Aer-R235C were the lowest, and both of them were 16% of the C-less Aer level. The instability of Aer-R235C has been recognized previously (13). Despite the low cellular levels of Aer-P211C and Aer-R235C, both mutant proteins supported aerotaxis in BT3312 when they were tested in soft agar without IPTG, although a large proportion of each colony consisted of the translucent zone (e.g., P211C in Fig. 2A). When the expression of either mutant was induced with 20 µM IPTG, the appearance in soft agar approached normal, possibly due to an increase in the number of mature Aer molecules per cell (not shown). With the exception of P211C and R235C, there was no apparent correlation between the different phenotypes observed in soft agar, such as superswarming or impaired function, and steady-state cellular levels.
![]() View larger version (56K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Steady-state expression levels and in vivo cross-linking for Aer cysteine mutants. (A) Steady-state expression levels were measured in BT3312 (aer tsr) after induction with 50 µM IPTG and then expressed as percentages of the C-less Aer (pMB1) level. The levels of C-less Aer were 92.6% ± 14.2% of the wild-type Aer (pGH1) levels (not shown), and mutants with steady-state levels less than 60% of the C-less Aer level (below the heavy dotted line) were considered unstable. An "X" indicates T224, where no cysteine mutant was made. (B) Percentage of dimer formation for each Aer cysteine mutant after incubation of cells with CuPhe for 10 min at 25°C. The data are from two or more independent cross-linking experiments. The secondary structure predicted by the PSA server (43) is shown beneath the graph (with helices indicated by cylinders and loops indicated by lines). (C) Helical wheel projections of the three proposed -helices, HAMP AS-1 (top panel), HAMP AS-2/proximal signaling domain (middle panel), and the signaling domain (bottom panel), each modeled as 3.5 residues per turn. In Aer, W206 (underlined) is at the membrane-cytosol boundary and marks the end of TM2 (5). The positions of local cross-linking maxima (residues 210 to 290 from Fig. 3B and residues 206 to 209 from reference 5) are indicated by a black background. The unexpected maximum at position 211 rather than 212 (gray background) is discussed in the text. Prox., proximal; SD, signaling domain.
|
As expected from its colony morphology in soft agar, Aer-L256C showed a true null aerotaxis phenotype in a temporal assay; cells exhibited random motility with no response to either an increase or decrease in oxygen at any level of induction up to 1 mM IPTG. Aer-L256C was also phenotypically recessive to wild-type Aer and did not inhibit the function of wild-type Aer when it was coexpressed at either low or high induction levels.
Disulfide cross-linking.
We used cysteine disulfide cross-linking (26) to analyze in vivo the secondary structure of the Aer HAMP and proximal signaling domains. In general, the rate and extent of disulfide cross-linking in response to an oxidant, such as CuPhe, reflect the proximity of introduced cysteines and/or the flexibility of the region being analyzed (5, 14, 35). If a protein forms a dimer, cognate cysteines that show the most extensive cross-linking are often located at a dimer interface (15). By comparing cross-linking rates for a large set of introduced cysteines, secondary structure can be inferred from characteristic periodicities or repeating patterns (14, 15, 41, 49). For example, a canonical
-helix has 3.6 residues per turn, a coiled-coil
-helix has 3.5 residues per turn, and a β-strand has 2 residues per repeat. The most probable secondary structure elements for Aer residues 210 to 290 were previously predicted using the PSA server (http://bmerc-www.bu.edu/psa/; 43) and are shown in the domain map in Fig. 3B.
To confirm the predicted secondary structure, the single introduced cysteines spanning Aer residues 210 to 290 were cross-linked in intact cells after induction with 50 µM IPTG. The four less stable Aer mutants (P211C, R235C, G240C, and G277C) required 100 µM IPTG but were included in the analysis since the mature molecules made by these mutants were functional, indicating that their native conformation was not extensively disrupted. For these analyses, cells were treated with CuPhe at 25°C, after which cross-linked dimers were separated from non-cross-linked monomers by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis under nonreducing conditions and visualized by Western blotting. Under these conditions, the amounts of the dimer products increased linearly for 15 min for all the mutants tested except Aer-L256C, which cross-linked maximally by 5 min (not shown). Since the extent of in vivo cross-linking was low for most mutants after 5 min of exposure to CuPhe, comparisons were made at 10 min.
Cross-linking in the HAMP domain.
The Aer HAMP domain is predicted to consist of two
-helices, AS-1 and AS-2, that are separated by a connector with an undefined structure (43). Like AS-1 in other HAMP domains, AS-1 in Aer is predicted to be an amphipathic
-helix, but unlike AS-2 in other HAMP domains, AS-2 in Aer is predicted to be a buried
-helix with no obvious hydrophilic face (43). In this study, cross-linking in the HAMP AS-1 region (residues 207 to 224) was consistent with an
-helix (Fig. 3B) and could be modeled as either a 3.6-residue-per-turn
-helix (not shown) or a 3.5-residue-per-turn
-helix (Fig. 3C, top panel). At the proximal end of AS-1, neither P211C (the apparent peak) nor I212C (the expected peak) cross-linked strongly (Fig. 3B and 3C). These results may have been influenced by the presence (in I212C) or absence (in P211C) of proline at residue 211, which typically introduces a bend into a helix (7). Such a bend might be required for the native conformation of some HAMP domains, since replacing the proline with cysteine in Aer (Fig. 3A) or in Tar (14) yields an unstable receptor. At the distal end of AS-1, there were similar rates of cross-linking at V222C (the expected peak) and at A223C (Fig. 3B and 3C), suggesting that the distal end of AS-1 is flexible. The region immediately following AS-1 (the connector, residues 225 to 234) could not be modeled as either an
-helix or a β-strand but was consistent with a structured loop (Fig. 3B).
We previously defined the boundaries of AS-2 at residues 235 and 253 in Aer (62). However, in the recent solution structure of the Af1503 HAMP domain residues corresponding to Aer residues 235 to 237 are part of the connector, not AS-2 (36). In the present study, the cross-linking periodicity was consistent with an
-helix from residue 235 to residue 259, beyond AS-2 (Fig. 3B). This region was best modeled as a 3.5-residue-per-turn
-helix (Fig. 3C, middle panel). Moreover, in both AS-2 and AS-1, the positions with the greatest rates of cross-linking are occupied by hydrophobic amino acids in native Aer (with the exception of T242C) and correspond with the a and d positions of heptad repeating motifs (a-b-c-d-e-f-g) (45) (Fig. 3C).This motif is commonly observed in coiled coils and four-helix bundles (20, 50). In AS-2, there are five additional hydrophobic positions that are not located at the dimer interface, perhaps explaining why AS-2 in Aer, but not in Tar, is predicted to be buried (14, 43).
Cross-linking in the proximal signaling domain.
As reported above, the heptad repeat pattern of AS-2 continued into the proximal signaling domain (residues 254 to 271 [43]) to residue 259 (Fig. 3B). This indicates that the N terminus of the proximal signaling domain forms a continuous helix with AS-2 (Fig. 3C, middle panel). Following residue 259, the periodicity of the helix was disrupted by consecutive cross-linking peaks that were four residues apart (Fig. 3B). This is consistent with the presence of a four- to eight-residue loop, similar to that predicted by the PSA server (43). However, precise boundaries could not be determined from the data because the rates of cross-linking at residues 263 and 264 were not significantly different (Fig. 3B). In addition, the structure of the Aer-Q263C receptor may be altered by the cysteine substitution at 263, since the mutant is a dominant, CW-biased mutant. This region of the proximal signaling domain was followed by a heptad repeat pattern that was phase shifted in comparison with AS-2. Like AS-2, this region of the signaling domain was best modeled as a 3.5-residue-per-turn
-helix (Fig. 3C, bottom panel); unlike AS-2, this helix contained predominately polar residues in the a and d positions.
Model for HAMP structure. The HAMP domain structure that was recently solved for a putative transmembrane receptor (Af1503) from A. fulgidus is the first HAMP structure available (36). The Af1503 HAMP domain forms a dimeric, four-helix bundle with a parallel coiled-coil structure (36). To compare the AS-1/AS-1' and AS-2/AS-2' dimer interfaces of the Af1503 HAMP structure with the corresponding interfaces of Aer, we generated an Aer HAMP dimer model using DeepView/Swiss-Model and the coordinates of the A. fulgidus Af1503 HAMP domain (Fig. 4A). In the Aer HAMP model, residues predicted to be on the AS-1/AS-1' and AS-2/AS-2' interfaces were the same interface residues identified by cross-linking (with the exception of P211 and A223, as explained previously) (Fig. 4B and C). With few exceptions, residues in AS-1 or AS-2 that did not dimerize faced outward, away from the dimer interface of the model (not shown).
![]() View larger version (39K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Distribution of residues with maximal disulfide cross-linking and Aer mutant phenotypes mapped onto an in silico model of the Aer HAMP domain. (A) Aer HAMP dimer model with helices indicated by blue (AS-1) or red (AS-2), connectors indicated by gray, and monomers distinguished by dark and light shading. (B and C) Residues with maximal cross-linking in AS-1 (B) and the AS-2/proximal signaling domain (C) mapped onto the in silico model (compare with Fig. 3). (D) Distribution of lesions that result in the following known phenotypes: CW bias phenotype (blue), null aerotaxis phenotype associated with unstable Aer protein (red), and null aerotaxis phenotype associated with comparatively more stable Aer protein (green). There are both signal-on (CW) and signal-off (null) mutants at residue W255. The Aer mutants analyzed are shown in Fig. 1.
|
![]() View larger version (35K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Comparison between in vivo cross-linking (data from Fig. 3B) and predicted β-carbon distances for residues in the HAMP and proximal signaling domains. β-Carbon distances between cognate residues were determined from the Aer HAMP dimer model in PyMOL, as described in Materials and Methods.
|
Distribution of CW-biased lesions in the folded HAMP domain. Null and CW-biased lesions were mapped previously onto a linear representation of the Aer HAMP and proximal signaling domains (13, 43, 62) (Fig. 1). With the creation of a folded Aer HAMP model, it was possible to map these lesions onto a tertiary structure, an exercise that provided new insights into structure-function relationships in Aer. For example, mutations known to cause Aer to signal constantly in the absence of aerotactic stimuli (CW-biased mutants) are not contiguous in the linear sequence (Fig. 1) but are clustered together in the folded HAMP model at the distal end of the four-helix bundle (Fig. 4D). The finding that CW-biased HAMP lesions are localized suggests that this region plays a key role in signal transduction and is a prime candidate for interactions with the PAS domain. We previously observed that CW-biased Aer PAS mutants that are functionally rescued by chemoreceptors typically become superswarming mutants (63). However, in this study, not all superswarming mutants showed a CW bias in the absence of chemoreceptors. Only 6 of the 18 superswarming mutants in Fig. 2B (in BT3312; tsr aer) were nonaerotactic in a receptorless strain (BT3388; aer tsr tar trg tap), and just one of these, V222C, was CW biased (Fig. 1). Of note, V222 is located in the same region of the model occupied by lesions in the other CW-biased mutants (Fig. 4D).
In silico mutagenesis and predicted effects on protein packing and stability. The HAMP domain is required for proper folding (34) and maturation (13) of the Aer protein, and HAMP null mutants (unlike CW-biased mutants) often produce an unstable Aer protein (13, 43). When these lesions (shown in Fig. 1 and in references 13, 43, and 62) were mapped onto the Aer HAMP model, they were dispersed throughout the structure, although the lesions that cause the most severe maturation defects were located in the HAMP domain (Fig. 4D) (13, 62), while those that cause less severe maturation defects were located in or near the proximal signaling domain (Fig. 4D).
To gain insight into how these null mutants might affect the stability of Aer, we used PyMOL to "mutate" each of the 22 relevant side chains in silico and then reexamined the modeled structure. We found that 12 of the 22 substituted side chains were not permissible in any conformation because each rotamer caused steric hindrance and/or charge-charge repulsion (Fig. 1). To allow for readjustment of the backbone coordinates to accommodate side chain substitutions, we remodeled each of the 22 null mutants in DeepView/Swiss-Model using the coordinates of the Af1503 HAMP domain. When the mutants were remodeled, 10 of the side chain substitutions were accommodated (determined using WHAT IF), but the remaining 12 substitutions caused one or more defects, such as nonpermissible bond angles or bond lengths (Fig. 1). Ten of these nonpermitted substitutions overlapped with those determined by manually mutating side chains in PyMOL (Fig. 1). Seven of the eight substitutions that were permissible by either modeling method had fully surface-exposed side chains. Although these substitutions did not cause major structural deformities, they may disrupt stabilizing hydrogen bonds, salt bridges, or interactions with other parts of the Aer protein.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (34K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Proposed model of an Aer dimer in cartoon format (left panel) and ribbon format (right panel). In the left panel, helices are represented by cylinders, loops are represented by lines, and PAS domains are represented by ellipses. In the right panel, the structures of the Aer PAS, HAMP, and signaling domains were modeled as described in Materials and Methods from the previously published coordinates of the NifL PAS (37), Af1503 HAMP (36), and MCP1143C signaling (51) domains, respectively. The F1(A. J. Campbell, K. J. Watts, and B. L. Taylor, unpublished data), membrane (4, 5), and proximal signaling domains (this study) were modeled from Aer cysteine cross-linking data. Also shown are the location of the glycine hinge (21) and the theoretical register between the proximal signaling domain and C-terminal tail of Aer (1).
|
The largest differences between the structure of the Aer HAMP domain and the structure of the Af1503 HAMP domain were in the connector that links AS-1 to AS-2. Both connectors are structured loops that begin with a conserved glycine (G225 in Aer) that is required for a U-turn toward AS-2 (Fig. 4A) (36). However, the Aer connector is one residue shorter, and the rates of cross-linking did not correlate with predicted β-carbon distances in the Aer HAMP model (Fig. 5, middle panel).
The data for the proximal signaling domain (residues 254 to 271) were consistent with a predominantly coiled-coil structure formed by extending the flanking AS-2 and signaling domain helices (Fig. 3B and C). However, the helical structure of the proximal signaling domain was not continuous. There was a brief gap in the heptad repeat pattern after residue 259, and although the structure of this break was not defined by cross-linking, it may be a short loop, as predicted by the PSA server (43). The heptad repeat pattern of the helix distal to this loop was also phase shifted in comparison with AS-2. A similar helical break at the end of the HAMP domain has been predicted for other chemoreceptors (42) and has been demonstrated for Tar (22). However, this helical break occurs at the end of the HAMP domain in chemoreceptors such as Tar (corresponding to residues 253 to 257 of Aer), whereas in Aer it is located within the proximal signaling domain after residue 259.
The region scanned by cysteine substitutions in this study is a known locus (Fig. 1) for null lesions that lead to unstable Aer proteins (13, 43). However, in this study most cysteine substitutions caused only minor changes in structure or function (Fig. 2 and 3A). Only four of the mutants, P211C, R235C, G240C, and G277C, had low steady-state protein levels (Fig. 3A), suggesting that a cysteine substitution at most positions did not affect protein maturation or stability. All four cysteine mutants that had low Aer protein levels supported aerotaxis, indicating that in these Aer mutants a sufficient fraction of molecules folded into a functional conformation. Although none of the cysteine replacements in the HAMP domain eliminated aerotaxis, three replacements in the proximal signaling domain did disrupt aerotaxis (W255C, L256C, and Q363C) (Fig. 2) but did not appear to affect protein stability (Fig. 3A). Notably, cysteine replacements at equivalent positions in the aspartate receptor (Tar-D263 [Aer-W255] and Tar-T264 [Aer-L256]) also eliminate receptor function (22).
In silico mutagenesis of the HAMP domain was used to simulate null lesions that destabilize the Aer protein. More than one-half of the lesions that we modeled disrupted the four-helix bundle of the modeled HAMP domain. These in silico findings raise the following interesting possibilities: (i) disruptions in the four-helix HAMP bundle may destabilize the entire Aer protein, (ii) a four-helix bundle might be critical for folding of Aer in the maturation sequence, or (iii) the four-helix bundle may shield residues sensitive to proteolysis.
Signaling mechanisms. Aer and the E. coli chemoreceptors have a common signal output from a highly conserved signaling domain, but the initial signal transduction events differ. It is likely that different input signals are converted into a common signal at the HAMP domain, and the findings of this study suggest that the site of convergence for Aer is at the distal end of the HAMP domain, where a cluster of CW-biased (gain-of-function) lesions augments PAS-HAMP interactions (Fig. 4D). It has been proposed that the Af1503 four-helix HAMP bundle switches between the on and off signaling states by rotating neighboring helices between two nearly isoenergetic packing geometries (36). The interdigitating side chains of the bundle require that the neighboring helices rotate in opposite directions in the manner of a gear box with four cogwheels (36). This would result in less than a 3-Å change between most side chain distances in the HAMP domain, differences that would not be easily resolved by disulfide cross-linking. Since the Aer HAMP domain appears to have a structure similar to that of the Af1503 HAMP domain (Fig. 4 and 5), the four helices of the Aer HAMP domain might also rotate between kinase-on and kinase-off conformations. Aer is normally in the signal-off (counterclockwise) state until PAS-HAMP interactions, parallel to the plane of the membrane, promote the signal-on (CW) state (13, 61, 62). This is different from the chemoreceptors, which signal to the HAMP domain by a piston-type movement across the membrane. The general mechanism by which a HAMP domain transforms different input signals into a common signal output remains to be determined.
The input signal to the HAMP domain is initiated by a redox change in the isoalloxazine ring of FAD bound to the PAS domain (24, 56, 58). How the resulting conformational change is propagated through the PAS domain to the HAMP domain remains to be determined. Known signal transduction mechanisms in other PAS domains include movement of the FG loop (in the direct oxygen sensor [40], PAS kinase [3], and FixL [28, 29, 31, 47]) and displacement of a PAS N-terminal helix (in Vivid [65] and the photoactive yellow protein [32, 54]) or C-terminal helix (in phototropin LOV2 [33]). Although there is no direct evidence for either mechanism in Aer, displacement of the PAS N-terminal helix (the N-cap) does appear to play a role in signaling, since removing the N-cap results in a conformation that mimics the signal-on state of Aer (63). This may be analogous to what has been observed for the resolved structure of the Avena sativa LOV2 domain, where the structure of the PAS domain in the light-induced (signal-on) state is similar to the structure obtained when the C-terminal helix has been removed (33).
During signal transduction, the HAMP domain may rotate, but it is unlikely that the output from the signaling domain is also rotation. Fluorescence polarization measurements of yellow fluorescent protein tethered to the signaling domain of the Tsr chemoreceptor were consistent with lateral displacement between trimers of dimers but not rotation of the signaling domain (60). The signaling domain is proposed to flex at a glycine hinge (Gly330 and Gly331 in Aer) (Fig. 6) within the flexible-bundle subdomain (21). Aer apparently uses a similar signaling mechanism because the signaling domains of chemoreceptors are interchangeable with the Aer signaling domain (8, 56), and Aer can signal in mixed trimers of dimers with other chemoreceptors (30). If signal propagation involves rotation of the HAMP domain but flexing of the signaling domain, the "loop" at the end of the HAMP domain (in chemoreceptors) or in the proximal signaling domain (in Aer) may have a role in torque conversion. A mechanical (Lego) model constructed to simulate a four-helix coiled-coil domain is able to convert gear box rotation of the helices into bending of an attached helix, if a flexible hinge is attached to the distal end (R. Alexander and I. Zhulin, personal communication). If a short loop in the proximal signaling domain permits bending, a hinged proximal signaling domain could perform the torque conversion. The concept of bending is conjecture at this time, but torque conversion of a HAMP rotation into flexing of the signaling domain is a fruitful area for further investigation to determine whether torque conversion is the role of conserved proximal signaling domains in these sensory systems.
This work was supported by grant GM29481 from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences to B. L. Taylor.
Published ahead of print on 18 January 2008. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»