Previous Article
Journal of Bacteriology, March 2008, p. 2249-2251, Vol. 190, No. 6
0021-9193/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JB.01824-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
The Chaperone IpgC Copurifies with the Virulence Regulator MxiE
M. Carolina Pilonieta and
George P. Munson*
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
Received 19 November 2007/
Accepted 31 December 2007

ABSTRACT
The expression of a subset of
Shigella flexneri virulence genes
is dependent upon a cytoplasmic chaperone, IpgC, and an activator
from the AraC/XylS family, MxiE. In this paper, we report that
the chaperone forms a specific and stable heteromer with MxiE.

TEXT
Shigella flexneri is the causative agent of bacillary dysentery,
which is endemic throughout the world (
6).
S. flexneri has a
type III secretion system for the delivery of proteins needed
to colonize and invade the colonic epithelium (
4,
6). Although
many virulence genes are transcribed prior to secretion, the
transcription of others is linked to the initiation of secretion.
This latter group includes genes within the MxiE regulon, such
as
ipaH9.8,
ospE2,
ospC1,
ospF, and
virA (
5,
7,
8). MxiE is
a 29-kDa protein and a member of the AraC/XylS family of transcriptional
regulators (
3); however, its activity requires the 18-kDa protein
IpgC, which functions as a coactivator for the transcription
of virulence genes within the MxiE regulon (
5,
7,
8). Prior
to the secretion of invasion and effector proteins, IpgC is
unable to serve as a coactivator with MxiE because, as a chaperone,
it is sequestered in complexes with IpaB and IpaC (
1,
9). Upon
the secretion of IpaB and IpaC, however, IpgC is available to
take on its subsequent role as a coactivator with MxiE (
7,
9).
Other pathogens, such as
Chromobacterium violaceum, enterohemorrhagic
Escherichia coli,
Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, and
Yersinia enterocolitica, are likely to utilize similar regulatory
systems, based upon homologies to MxiE and IpgC and, in some
cases, experimental evidence (
2,
7,
10,
17).
Unlike IpaB and IpaC, the stable expression of MxiE is not dependent upon IpgC. Nevertheless, it has been proposed that IpgC forms a heteromer with MxiE, as it does with IpaB and IpaC, and that the formation of a MxiE-IpgC complex is essential for the activation of virulence genes within the MxiE regulon (7, 13). However, the available experimental evidence challenges the validity of this model. With IpgC as the bait in a yeast two-hybrid system, there was no evidence of an interaction between MxiE and IpgC (7). MxiE also failed to copurify with His6-IpgC when it was expressed in S. flexneri or when the two proteins were coexpressed in E. coli under conditions that allowed for the copurification of either IpaB or IpaC with His6-IpgC (7, 12). Perhaps genetic and biochemical methods have failed to detect an MxiE-IpgC heteromer because it is short-lived, as has previously been suggested (7). However, this seems unlikely because it has been shown that the MxiE homolog InvF forms a stable complex with the IpgC homolog SicA from S. enterica serovar Typhimurium (2). A better understanding of the actual differences and similarities between these homologous systems would enhance future mechanistic studies by facilitating appropriate experimental design.
To elucidate the mechanism of MxiE- and IpgC-dependent transcription, we sought to develop an in vitro system to study the DNA binding of MxiE as a function of IpgC. AraC/XylS family members are notoriously insoluble in vitro (3, 16); therefore, we constructed a recombinant plasmid, pSFUM138, which expresses a fusion between maltose-binding protein (MBP) and MxiE from an isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG)-inducible tac promoter. The addition of MBP to the amino termini of other AraC/XylS family members has been shown to substantially enhance their solubility in vitro without perturbing their activity (11, 15). We also constructed a second plasmid, pSFUM139, which expresses MBP-MxiE in cis with His6-IpgC from tacp. The addition of a hexahistidyl epitope tag to IpgC has no effect on the activity of the protein (7, 12).
E. coli K-12 strains TB1/pSFUM138 (malE::mxiE) (TB1 was obtained from New England Biolabs) and TB1/pSFUM139 (malE::mxiE His6::ipgC) were cultured aerobically at 37°C in Luria-Bertani medium with ampicillin at 100 µg/ml and 0.2% (wt/vol) glucose until the optical absorbance of the culture reached 0.6 at 600 nm. The temperature was then reduced to 30°C, and the expression was induced by the addition of IPTG to a final concentration of 0.5 mM. Bacterial cells were harvested by centrifugation after 3 hours of induction and then resuspended in 10 ml of ice-cold lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-Cl [pH 7.6 at room temperature], 200 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM CaCl2, 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 100 µg/ml DNase I, 500 µg/ml lysozyme, 10% [vol/vol] glycerol). All subsequent purification steps were conducted at 4°C. Cells were lysed by passage through a French press, and the lysate was clarified by high-speed centrifugation. MBP-MxiE was then bound to an amylose column (New England Biolabs) equilibrated with buffer A (10 mM Tris-Cl [pH 7.6 at room temperature], 200 mM NaCl, 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 10% [vol/vol] glycerol) and eluted with buffer B (buffer A with 10 mM maltose). This procedure resulted in substantial purification of MBP-MxiE from both strains (Fig. 1). We also observed a protein that copurified with MBP-MxiE from strain TB1/pSFUM139 (malE::mxiE His6::ipgC) (Fig. 1, lane 4) but not when MBP-MxiE was purified from TB1/pSFUM138 (malE::mxiE) (Fig. 1, lane 2). The molecular mass of the copurifying protein was near the expected 19 kDa of His6-IpgC. Based on a previous report that IpgC and MxiE do not copurify (7), we did not anticipate these results, but subsequent Western blot analyses using an antibody (Cell Signaling Technology) that recognizes the hexahistidyl epitope tag confirmed that the 19-kDa protein is His6-IpgC (data not shown). The copurification of His6-IpgC with MBP-MxiE is the result of a specific interaction between the regulator and chaperone because His6-IpgC does not copurify with MBP (Fig. 2 and data not shown).
MxiE is encoded by two overlapping open reading frames that
are out of frame with each other by –1 nucleotide. During
transcription, an extra nucleotide is occasionally inserted
into the nascent mRNA, resulting in a continuous
mxiE open reading
frame (
14). The second open reading frame contains
mxiE codons
44 to 251. Although MxiE(44-251) cannot activate transcription
(
14), we repeated our copurification protocol with MBP-MxiE(44-251)
to determine if IpgC forms a complex with the truncated protein.
MBP-MxiE(44-251) was expressed in
cis with IpgC in strain TB1/pMalMxiEIpgC
[
malE::
mxiE(44-251)
ipgC] and purified on an amylose column,
as described above. Analysis of the eluate revealed that IpgC
copurified with MBP-MxiE(44-251) (Fig.
2, lane 1). Furthermore,
copurification occurred in the absence of a hexahistidyl tag
on IpgC. The eluate also contained a significant amount of MBP
as the result of proteolytic cleavage of the MBP fusion protein
during purification, presumably within the flexible linker between
MBP and MxiE(44-251). The amylose column eluate was diluted
fourfold with a dilution buffer (10 mM Tris-Cl [pH 7.6 at room
temperature], 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 15% [vol/vol]
glycerol) and then applied to an anion-exchange column (HiTrap
Q FF; GE Healthcare) that had been equilibrated with Q buffer
(dilution buffer with 50 mM NaCl). Afterward, the bound proteins
were eluted from the column with a continuous gradient of 50
to 500 mM NaCl. Analysis of selected fractions revealed that
both MBP-MxiE(44-251) and IpgC passed through the anion-exchange
column without retention (Fig.
2, lane 2). In contrast, MBP
bound to the column and was not eluted until the concentration
of NaCl exceeded 90 mM (Fig.
2, lanes 3 to 5). These results
are consistent with our previous conclusion that IpgC forms
a specific complex with MxiE because IpgC can be separated from
MBP by anion-exchange chromatography.
In our experience, the MxiE-IpgC complex is not transient. Rather, the heteromer is stable from approximately 15 mM to 1 M NaCl and resistant to the nonionic detergent Tween 20 at 0.25% (vol/vol). This is curious because previous attempts to copurify IpgC with MxiE from E. coli lysates have been unsuccessful (7). One clear methodological difference between this study and the previous work is that we used an amylose affinity column to copurify IpgC with MBP-MxiE, while the previous study used a metal ion affinity resin in an attempt to copurify His6-IpgC with MxiE. However, it is unlikely that this difference accounts for the different experimental outcomes, because SicA was copurified with InvF-His6 on a nickel agarose column (2). Perhaps when His6-IpgC is in a macromolecular complex with MxiE, its hexahistidyl tag is buried and unable to interact with metal ions. Nevertheless, the results of this study demonstrate that MxiE and IpgC form a stable heteromer, as do InvF and SicA (2). This also indicates that the two systems are likely to activate transcription via a similar mechanism. Although many remaining questions must be addressed before this mechanism is fully understood, it is probable that the formation of a long-lived MxiE-IpgC or InvF-SicA complex is an essential early step.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank A. T. Maurelli and S. M. Payne for providing the strains
of
S. flexneri.
This work was supported by Public Health Service award AI 057648 from the National Institutes of Health and the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, P.O. Box 016960 (R-138), Miami, FL 33101. Phone: (305) 243-5317. Fax: (305) 243-4623. E-mail:
gmunson{at}miami.edu 
Published ahead of print on 11 January 2008. 

REFERENCES
1 - Birket, S. E., A. T. Harrington, M. Espina, N. D. Smith, C. M. Terry, N. Darboe, A. P. Markham, C. R. Middaugh, W. L. Picking, and W. D. Picking. 2007. Preparation and characterization of translocator/chaperone complexes and their component proteins from Shigella flexneri. Biochemistry 46:8128-8137.[CrossRef][Medline]
2 - Darwin, K. H., and V. L. Miller. 2001. Type III secretion chaperone-dependent regulation: activation of virulence genes by SicA and InvF in Salmonella typhimurium. EMBO J. 20:1850-1862.[CrossRef][Medline]
3 - Gallegos, M.-T., R. Schleif, A. Bairoch, K. Hofmann, and J. L. Ramos. 1997. Arac/XylS family of transcriptional regulators. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 61:393-410.[Abstract]
4 - Hueck, C. J. 1998. Type III protein secretion systems in bacterial pathogens of animals and plants. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62:379-433.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5 - Kane, C. D., R. Schuch, W. A. Day, Jr., and A. T. Maurelli. 2002. MxiE regulates intracellular expression of factors secreted by the Shigella flexneri 2a type III secretion system. J. Bacteriol. 184:4409-4419.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6 - Labrec, E. H., H. Schneider, T. J. Magnani, and S. B. Formal. 1964. Epithelial cell penetration as an essential step in the pathogenesis of bacillary dysentery. J. Bacteriol. 88:1503-1518.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7 - Mavris, M., A. L. Page, R. Tournebize, B. Demers, P. Sansonetti, and C. Parsot. 2002. Regulation of transcription by the activity of the Shigella flexneri type III secretion apparatus. Mol. Microbiol. 43:1543-1553.[CrossRef][Medline]
8 - Mavris, M., P. J. Sansonetti, and C. Parsot. 2002. Identification of the cis-acting site involved in activation of promoters regulated by activity of the type III secretion apparatus in Shigella flexneri. J. Bacteriol. 184:6751-6759.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9 - Menard, R., P. Sansonetti, C. Parsot, and T. Vasselon. 1994. Extracellular association and cytoplasmic partitioning of the IpaB and IpaC invasins of S. flexneri. Cell 79:515-525.[CrossRef][Medline]
10 - Miller, V. L. 2002. Connections between transcriptional regulation and type III secretion? Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 5:211-215.[CrossRef][Medline]
11 - Munson, G. P., and J. R. Scott. 1999. Binding site recognition by Rns, a virulence regulator in the AraC family. J. Bacteriol. 181:2110-2117.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12 - Page, A. L., H. Ohayon, P. J. Sansonetti, and C. Parsot. 1999. The secreted IpaB and IpaC invasins and their cytoplasmic chaperone IpgC are required for intercellular dissemination of Shigella flexneri. Cell. Microbiol. 1:183-193.[CrossRef][Medline]
13 - Parsot, C., E. Ageron, C. Penno, M. Mavris, K. Jamoussi, H. d'Hauteville, P. Sansonetti, and B. Demers. 2005. A secreted anti-activator, OspD1, and its chaperone, Spa15, are involved in the control of transcription by the type III secretion apparatus activity in Shigella flexneri. Mol. Microbiol. 56:1627-1635.[Medline]
14 - Penno, C., P. Sansonetti, and C. Parsot. 2005. Frameshifting by transcriptional slippage is involved in production of MxiE, the transcription activator regulated by the activity of the type III secretion apparatus in Shigella flexneri. Mol. Microbiol. 56:204-214.[CrossRef][Medline]
15 - Ruíz, R., S. Marqués, and J. L. Ramos. 2003. Leucines 193 and 194 at the N-terminal domain of the XylS protein, the positive transcriptional regulator of the TOL meta-cleavage pathway, are involved in dimerization. J. Bacteriol. 185:3036-3041.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16 - Schleif, R. 2003. AraC protein: a love-hate relationship. Bioessays 25:274-282.[CrossRef][Medline]
17 - Walker, K. A., and V. L. Miller. 2004. Regulation of the Ysa type III secretion system of Yersinia enterocolitica by YsaE/SycB and YsrS/YsrR. J. Bacteriol. 186:4056-4066.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Journal of Bacteriology, March 2008, p. 2249-2251, Vol. 190, No. 6
0021-9193/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JB.01824-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Faherty, C. S., Maurelli, A. T.
(2009). Spa15 of Shigella flexneri Is Secreted through the Type III Secretion System and Prevents Staurosporine-Induced Apoptosis. Infect. Immun.
77: 5281-5290
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Vakulskas, C. A., Brady, K. M., Yahr, T. L.
(2009). Mechanism of Transcriptional Activation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa ExsA. J. Bacteriol.
191: 6654-6664
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Cue, D., Lei, M. G., Luong, T. T., Kuechenmeister, L., Dunman, P. M., O'Donnell, S., Rowe, S., O'Gara, J. P., Lee, C. Y.
(2009). Rbf Promotes Biofilm Formation by Staphylococcus aureus via Repression of icaR, a Negative Regulator of icaADBC. J. Bacteriol.
191: 6363-6373
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Brutinel, E. D., Vakulskas, C. A., Yahr, T. L.
(2009). Functional Domains of ExsA, the Transcriptional Activator of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa Type III Secretion System. J. Bacteriol.
191: 3811-3821
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Thibault, J., Faudry, E., Ebel, C., Attree, I., Elsen, S.
(2009). Anti-activator ExsD Forms a 1:1 Complex with ExsA to Inhibit Transcription of Type III Secretion Operons. J. Biol. Chem.
284: 15762-15770
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Walker, K. A., Miller, V. L.
(2009). Synchronous Gene Expression of the Yersinia enterocolitica Ysa Type III Secretion System and Its Effectors. J. Bacteriol.
191: 1816-1826
[Abstract]
[Full Text]