Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Bacteriology, April 2008, p. 2633-2636, Vol. 190, No. 7
0021-9193/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JB.01859-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
A Viable Bacillus subtilis Strain without Functional Extracytoplasmic Function Sigma Genes
Kei Asai,
Keisuke Ishiwata,
Kunihiko Matsuzaki, and
Yoshito Sadaie*
Department of Molecular Biology, Faculty of Science, Saitama University, 255 Shimo-Okubo, Sakura-ku, Saitama City 338-8570, Japan
Received 27 November 2007/
Accepted 10 January 2008

ABSTRACT
We constructed a
Bacillus subtilis Marburg strain that harbors
deletion mutations in all seven extracytoplasmic function (ECF)
sigma genes. The strain shows wild-type growth at 37°C both
in a complex and in a synthetic medium and exhibits wild-type
sporulation. ECF sigma genes of
B. subtilis are dispensable
as long as no stress is imposed, although they seem to be required
for quick response to stresses.

TEXT
Since the assignment of sigma E of
Streptomyces coelicolor to
a subfamily of eubacterial RNA polymerase sigma factors (
14),
many sigma factors belonging to this family have been described
(
3,
4,
9,
18,
22). These sigma factors were called extracytoplasmic
function (ECF) sigma factors, as they were found to direct the
expression of proteins functioning in the outer membrane or
in periplasmic space (
14). Further analysis, however, revealed
that these sigma factors direct expression of proteins functioning
in cytoplasmic space, as well (
2,
5,
9,
21,
28).
The numbers of ECF sigma genes vary among bacterial species. Some bacteria have lost ECF sigma genes, and some bacteria possess a lot of them (9). These ECF sigma genes are believed to be nonessential and auxiliary in nature, although inactivation of rpoE in Escherichia coli and sigG in Synechocystis sp. strain PCC6803 was proven to be lethal (8, 11). In Bacillus subtilis W23, simultaneous inactivation of sigX and sigM causes a growth defect (17). However, the exact roles of those sigma genes in the maintenance of growth have still not been elucidated, and there is no study in which all stress sigma genes have been systematically inactivated in an organism. For this study, we successively interrupted all ECF sigma genes of B. subtilis to construct an ECF sigmaless strain in order to examine whether the genes are indispensable or merely auxiliary.
B. subtilis has seven ECF sigma genes (sigM, sigV, sigW, sigX, sigY, sigZ, and ylaC), which are negatively regulated by anti-sigma proteins, except for sigZ (2, 6, 7, 9, 13, 16, 25, 26, 27). Inactivation of these sigma genes one at a time does not affect viability because the sigma factors seem to overlap functionally (6, 9, 10, 16, 26). A quadruple mutant (
sigV
sigY
sigZ
ylaC) of B. subtilis was constructed and was found to be viable (15).
In order to examine whether there is a minimal set of ECF sigma genes required for B. subtilis growth under nonstress conditions, we constructed deletion mutations in all seven ECF sigma genes on the genome of B. subtilis Marburg 168 (trpC2) as outlined in Fig. 1. Only one construction pathway is shown. There are many other possible pathways and many combinations of multiple disruptions, and we constructed a large number of different multiple disruptants (data not shown). During successive disruptions of ECF sigma genes, sufficient quantities of wild-type size transformants or segregants were obtained to suggest that there were no suppressor mutations, concerning colony size on LB agar, associated with the disruption of the ECF sigma genes. The sigW gene was disrupted at the end of the procedure because inactivation of sigW reduced competence (see below). All ECF sigma genes disrupted with the cm cassette (cat gene) were obtained from K. Kobayashi. The first step,
sigY strain construction, is shown in Fig. 1A. The kanamycin-resistant (Kmr) plasmid pCHE11(
sigY) bearing a deletion in sigY was constructed by PCR and introduced into the sigY::cm strain by transformation. Kmr transformants were selected at 30°C. Among Kmr transformants, a few colonies [pCHE11 (
sigY)/
sigY] were chloramphenicol sensitive (Cms) due to gene conversion between
sigY on pCHE11 and chromosomal sigY::cm (12). Kmr Cms transformants thus obtained were grown in drug-free LB broth at 37°C to cure the plasmid and to obtain a plasmid-free
sigY strain, as pCHE11 (obtained from F. Kawamura) has a mutation leading to temperature-sensitive replication (19). The deletion mutation
sigY was confirmed by PCR. Next, the sigZ::cm
sigY strain was constructed by transformation of the
sigY strain with DNA from the sigZ::cm strain (Fig. 1B). Plasmid pCHE11 (
sigZ) was introduced into the sigZ::cm
sigY strain. A plasmid-free
sigZ
sigY strain was derived from pCHE11 (
sigZ)/
sigY sigZ::cm cells through gene conversion and curing, as shown in Fig. 1A. These procedures were repeated successively, as depicted in Fig. 1B. The resulting strain was named BSU2007 (
sigY
sigZ
sigV
ylaC
sigX
sigM
sigW trpC2).
For construction of plasmid pCHE11 carrying a deletion mutation
in an ECF sigma gene, 5' and 3' regions of each ECF sigma gene
were PCR synthesized with primer pairs of each primer set (Table
1) and template wild-type chromosomal DNA. The resulting DNA
fragments bearing 5' and 3' regions of each ECF sigma gene were
annealed and subjected to PCR amplification with distal 5' and
3' primers. The synthesized DNA fragment carrying a deletion
followed by a stop codon in each ECF sigma gene was cloned into
plasmid pCHE11 in
E. coli cells.
Confirmation of the deletion mutations in all seven ECF sigma
genes was carried out by PCR amplification of the deleted or
wild-type genes with primer pairs described in the figure legend
and template DNA from strain BSU2007 or wild-type strain 168
(Fig.
2). BSU2007 carried a deletion mutation in each of the
seven ECF sigma genes.
The BSU2007 strain showed no obvious phenotype in LB broth (
23)
containing yeast extract, tryptone, and NaCl; the colony-forming
ability of the ECF sigma-free strain BSU2007 on LB broth agar
was similar to that of the wild-type strain at all temperatures
tested (20°C, 37°C, and 50°C). We studied several
characteristic features of the mutant BSU2007 under some other
conditions. As shown in Fig.
3, the ECF sigma-free strain BSU2007
showed wild-type growth in a complex LB broth or synthetic minimal
glucose medium (
1) but was slow to start growing in a complex
nutrient broth (Difco) containing beef extract and peptone.
However, addition of MgSO
4 (1 mM) to Difco nutrient broth restored
the wild-type growth of BSU2007 (data not shown). It grew like
the wild-type strain in a complex sporulation medium (
24) containing
complex nutrient broth (Difco) supplemented with metals and
salts [1 mM MgSO
4, 1 mM FeSO
4, 10 mM MnCl
2, 13.4 mM KCl, 1 mM
Ca(NO
3)
2]. The capacity to sporulate was not lost in BSU2007
(Table
2. On the other hand, BSU2007 showed defective competence
development (Table
3) in the above-mentioned synthetic minimal
glucose medium, due to the null function of
sigW leading to
low competence of strain BSU2000. BSU2006 carrying deletion
mutations in all six ECF sigma genes except
sigW showed wild-type
competence. Even in LB broth, BSU2007 showed slow growth recovery
after a temperature shift from 37°C to 52°C, as shown
in Fig.
4. The slow recovery did not seem to be due to suppressor
mutations, as recovered culture again showed slow growth recovery
at 52°C. The involvement of ECF sigma factors in heat adaptation
has not yet been studied. We also examined the stress sensitivity
of BSU2007. The stresses imposed were acetic acid, NaCl, HCl,
NaOH, EDTA, H
2O
2, sodium dodecyl sulfate, toluene, and ethanol.
Paper discs soaked with samples were placed on LB agar inoculated
with a culture of either the wild-type strain or the ECF sigmaless
BSU2007 strain. We examined the growth inhibition of the bacterial
lawn after an overnight incubation at 37°C. There were no
differences in the sensitivities of both strains to the above-mentioned
stresses, except for acetate and toluene. BSU2007 was more sensitive
than the wild-type strain only to acetate and toluene, as shown
in Table
4, although the sensitivity difference was small with
toluene.
The
B. subtilis strain BSU2007, which lacks seven functional
ECF sigma genes, is viable and shows no obvious defects as long
as no stress is imposed, although it exhibits slow growth in
Difco broth. However, it showed wild-type growth and sporulation
in a complex sporulation medium containing metals and salts
in Difco broth. The strain BSU2007 may not be able to compete
for growth in liquid medium with the wild-type strain; however,
prolonged mixed culture of both strains in LB broth at 37°C
for 3 days contained similar numbers of CFU of both strains.
BSU2007 showed slow recovery from high-temperature stress, although
its ability to form colonies was not affected. Some combination
of ECF sigma genes must be required for a quick response to
heat stress.
We are currently analyzing the phenotypes of various combinations of ECF sigma gene deletions to see which ECF sigma gene is responsible for which phenotype. Beyond that, since target gene candidates of the seven ECF sigma genes share only one target gene with those of the general stress sigma B (2), we are constructing multiple-stress-responsive sigma mutants based on BSU2007 in order to elucidate the nature of the stress response of B. subtilis.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Science, Saitama University, Saitama 338-8570, Japan. Phone: 81 (48) 858 3399. Fax: 81 (48) 858 3384. E-mail:
ysadaie{at}mail.saitama-u.ac.jp 
Published ahead of print on 25 January 2008. 

REFERENCES
1 - Anagnostopoulos, C., and J. Spizizen. 1969. Requirements for transformation in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 81:741-746.
2 - Asai, K., H. Yamaguchi, C.-M. Kang, K. Yoshida, Y. Fujita, and Y. Sadaie. 2003. DNA microarray analysis of Bacillus subtilis sigma factors of extracytoplasmic function family. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 220:155-160.[CrossRef][Medline]
3 - Bashvam, M. D., and S. F. Hasnain. 2004. The extracytoplasmic function sigma factors: role in bacterial pathogenesis. Infect. Genet. Evol. 4:301-308.[Medline]
4 - Brooks, B. E., and S. K. Buchanan. 15 June 2007. Signaling mechanisms for activation of extracytoplasmic function (ECF) sigma factors. 0Biochim. Biophys. Acta. doi:10.1016/j.bbamem2007.06.005.
5 - Butcher, B. G., and J. D. Helmann. 2006. Identification of Bacillus subtilis sigma-dependent genes that provide intrinsic resistance to antimicrobial compounds produced by Bacilli. Mol. Microbiol. 44:206-216.
6 - Cao, M., L. Salzberg, C. S. Tsai, T. Mascher, C. Bonilla, T. Wang, R. W. Ye, L. Marquez-Magana, and J. D. Helmann. 2003. Regulation of the Bacillus subtilis extracytoplasmic function protein
Y and its target promoters. J. Bacteriol. 185:4883-4890.[Abstract/Free Full Text] 7 - Cao, M., T. Wang, R. Ye, and J. D. Helmann. 2002. Antibiotics that inhibit cell wall biosynthesis induce expression of the Bacillus subtilis
W and
M regulons. Mol. Microbiol. 45:1267-1276.[CrossRef][Medline] 8 - DeLa Penas, A., L. Connolly, and C. A. Gross. 1997. Sigma E is an essential sigma factor in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 179:6862-6864.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9 - Helmann, J. D. 2002. The extracytoplasmic function (ECF) sigma factors. Adv. Microb. Physiol. 46:47-110.[CrossRef][Medline]
10 - Horsburgh, M. J., and A. Moir. 1999. Sigma M, an ECF RNA polymerase sigma factor of Bacillus subtilis 168, is essential for growth and survival in high concentrations of salt. Mol. Microbiol. 32:41-50.[CrossRef][Medline]
11 - Huckauf, J., C. Nomura, K. Forchhammer, and M. Hagemann. 2000. Stress responses of Synechocystis sp. strain PCC 6803 mutants impaired in genes encoding putative alternative sigma factors. Microbiology 146:2877-2889.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12 - Kawamura, F., L. F. Wang, and R. H. Doi. 1985. Catabolite-resistant sporulation (crsA) mutations in the Bacillus subtilis RNA polymerase sigma 43 gene (rpoD) can suppress and be suppressed by mutations in spo0 genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82:8124-8128.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13 - Kunst, F., N. Ogasawara, and I. Moszer. 1997. The complete genome sequence of the gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis. Nature 390:249-256.[CrossRef][Medline]
14 - Lonetto, M. A., K. L. Brown, K. E. Rudd, and M. J. Buttner. 1994. Analysis of the Streptomyces coelicolor sigE gene reveals the existence of a subfamily of eubacterial s factors involved in the regulation of extracytoplasmic functions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:7573-7577.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15 - Mascher, T., A.-B. Hachmann, and J. D. Helmann. 2007. Regulatory overlap and functional redundancy among Bacillus subtilis extracytoplasmic function
factors. J. Bacteriol. 189:6919-6927.[Abstract/Free Full Text] 16 - Matsumoto, T., K. Nakanishi, K. Asai, and Y. Sadaie. 2005. Transcriptional analysis of the ylaABCD operon of Bacillus subtilis encoding a sigma factor of extracytoplasmic function family. Genes Genet. Syst. 80:385-393.[CrossRef][Medline]
17 - Minning, K., J. L. Barblan, S. Kehl, S. B. Moller, and C. Mauel. 2003. In Bacillus subtilis W23, the duet sigma X sigma M, two sigma factors of the extracytoplasmic function subfamily, are required for septum and wall synthesis under batch culture conditions. Mol. Microbiol. 49:1435-1447.[CrossRef][Medline]
18 - Missiakas, D., and S. Raina. 1998. The extracytoplasmic function sigma factors: role and regulation. Mol. Microbiol. 28:1059-1066.[CrossRef][Medline]
19 - Nanamiya, H., K. Kasai, A. Nozawa, C.-S. Yun, T. Narisawa, K. Murakami, Y. Natori, F. Kawamura, and Y. Tozawa. 2008. Identification and functional analysis of novel (p)ppGpp synthetase genes in Bacillus subtilis. Mol. Microbiol. 67:291-304.[Medline]
20 - Ohshima, H., S. Matsuoka, K. Asai, and Y. Sadaie. 2002. Molecular organization of intrinsic restriction and modification genes BsuM of Bacillus subtilis Marburg. J. Bacteriol. 184:381-389.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21 - Paget, M. S., J. G. Kang, J. H. Roe, and M. J. Buttner. 1998. Sigma R, an RNA polymerase sigma factor that modulates expression of the thioredoxin system in response to oxidative stress in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2). EMBO J. 17:5776-5782.[CrossRef][Medline]
22 - Raivio, T. L., and T. J. Silhavy. 2001. Periplasmic stress and ECF sigma factors. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 55:591-624.[CrossRef][Medline]
23 - Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
24 - Schaeffer, P., J. Millet, and J. P. Aubert. 1965. Catabolic repression of bacterial sporulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 54:704-711.[Free Full Text]
25 - Schobel, S., S. Zelleier, W. Schumann, and T. Wiegert. 2004. The Bacillus subtilis sigma W anti-sigma factor RsiW is degraded by intramembrane proteolysis through YluC. Mol. Microbiol. 52:1091-1105.[CrossRef][Medline]
26 - Tojo, S., M. Matsunaga, T. Matsumoto, C. M. Kang, H. Yamaguchi, K. Asai, Y. Sadaie, K. Yoshida, and Y. Fujita. 2003. Organization and expression of the Bacillus subtilis sigY operon. J. Biochem. 134:935-946.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27 - Yoshimura, M., K. Asai, Y. Sadaie, and H. Yoshikawa. 2004. Interaction of Bacillus subtilis extracytoplasmic function (ECF) sigma factors with the N-terminal regions of their potential anti-sigma factors. Microbiology 150:591-599.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28 - Zellmeier, S., C. Hofmann, S. Thomas, T. Wiegert, and W. Schumann. 2005. Identification of
V-dependent genes of Bacillus subtilis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 253:221-229.[CrossRef][Medline]
Journal of Bacteriology, April 2008, p. 2633-2636, Vol. 190, No. 7
0021-9193/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JB.01859-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.