Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, February 2009, p. 805-814, Vol. 191, No. 3
0021-9193/09/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JB.01311-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
,
Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Biologiche ed Ambientali, Università del Salento, Via Monteroni, 73100 Lecce, Italy,1 National Food Research Institute, 2-1-12 Kannondai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8642, Japan2
Received 17 September 2008/ Accepted 24 November 2008
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
There have been many studies of the model organism Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2), which produces at least four antibiotics: the pigmented actinorhodin (Act) and undecylprodigiosin (Red), methylenomycin, and calcium-dependent antibiotic (CDA). Streptomyces lividans, a fast-growing close relative of S. coelicolor A3(2), has a number of advantages for use as a model system in which to investigate the activation of dormant antibiotic gene expression, including its production of little or no Act and Red despite the existence of all the required biosynthetic genes (11, 18). GDP 3'-diphosphate (ppGpp), which accumulates upon nutritional downshift, is a global regulator of gene expression, elicits secondary metabolism in bacteria (5, 9, 10, 17, 22, 23, 25, 30, 34, 38), and is thus called a bacterial alarmone (1). ppGpp binds RNA polymerase (RNAP) and causes a redirection of transcription so that genes important for starvation survival and virulence are favored at the expense of those required for growth and proliferation (the so-called stringent response) (4). Interestingly, certain rifampin resistance (rif) mutations, mapped within the RNAP β-chain-encoding gene rpoB, result in ppGpp-independent antibiotic production in S. coelicolor A3(2) and activate Act, Red, and CDA biosynthesis in S. lividans, suggesting that they can functionally mimic the modification induced by the binding of ppGpp (11, 39). The efficacy of RNAP mutations in activating the production of a dormant antibiotic (3,3'-neotrehalosadiamine) in Bacillus subtilis has also been shown previously (12).
The recent observation that several actinomycetes possess two rpoB genes, in contrast to the widely accepted consensus of the existence of a single RNAP in bacteria, has suggested the possibility of developing new strategies to activate dormant gene expression in bacteria. rpoB paralogs in Nonomuraea sp. strain ATCC 39727 (previously called Actinomadura), which produces the glycopeptide antibiotic A40926, were the first to be reported (37), and rpoB paralogs in Nocardia farcinica, an emerging pathogen in immunocompromised patients, were then observed (13). In Nonomuraea sp. strain ATCC 39727, rpoB(S) and rpoB(R) provide the microorganism with two functionally distinct and developmentally regulated RNAPs. Major differences between the rpoB(S) and rpoB(R) paralogs are depicted in Fig. 1A. rpoB(R) is characterized by an 18-bp in-frame deletion and mutations causing five amino acid substitutions (H426N, S431N, F445M, S474Y, and M581D), located within or close to the so-called rif clusters that play a key role in fundamental activities of RNAP (39). Of these substitutions, H426N was of particular interest because it corresponds to one of the rifampin resistance rpoB mutations that activate antibiotic production in S. lividans, H437N (11). Indeed, enhanced expression of rpoB(R) in Nonomuraea sp. strain ATCC 39727 causes overproduction of the glycopeptide A40926 in this organism (37). This observation prompted us to investigate the ability of Nonomuraea rpoB(R) to activate antibiotic production in Streptomyces spp., which have the potential to produce a wide variety of antibiotics. Here, we report the efficacy of rpoB(R) as a tool for the activation of cryptic antibiotic biosynthesis in S. lividans. The physiological significance of rpoB duplication is also discussed based on the results from actinomycetes isolated from soil.
![]() View larger version (40K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Features and transfer of rpoB(R) into S. lividans. (A) Physical and genetic maps of Nonomuraea sp. strain ATCC 39727 rpoB(S) and rpoB(R) loci (top), with the location of the primer pair 18-1/ 18-2 spanning the 18-bp rpoB(R)-specific deletion, and rpoB(R)-specific missense mutations (bottom). (B) Map of pTYM18 used as a conjugative vector to transfer rpoB(R) into S. lividans. p15a ori, origin of replication in E. coli; oriT, origin of conjugative transfer; aphII, kanamycin resistance gene; int, bacteriophage C31 integrase gene. (C) PCR analysis of DNA from S. lividans 1326 isolates after conjugal transfer of pTYM-rpoBR (lanes 1 to 3) or pTYM18 (lanes 6 to 8) by using the primer pair 18-1 and 18-2 spanning the 18-bp rpoB(R)-specific deletion (see panel A). DNA samples from Nonomuraea sp. strain ATCC 39727 (lane 4) or S. lividans 1326 (lane 5) were used as controls. (D) Rifampin resistance of S. lividans 1326 isolates after conjugal transfer of pTYM-rpoBR (right) or pTYM18 (left). Note the moderate production of actinorhodin (the diffusible blue pigment) in S. lividans 1326, even in the absence of the rpoB(R) gene, which may be triggered by subinhibitory concentrations of rifampin (8).
|
|
|
|---|
Plasmids and DNA procedures.
The rpoB(R) gene, including its own promoter region, was cloned into the BamHI site of pUC18 from a genomic library of Nonomuraea sp. strain ATCC 3972, which was constructed by partial restriction digestion of the bacterial DNA with BglII (Fig. 1A). The rpoB(R) gene was then excised as an EcoRI-XbaI fragment 4,044 bp in length. This fragment was ligated into pTYM18 (29), resulting in pTYM-rpoBR, carrying rpoB(R) in the same orientation as lacZ (Fig. 1B). Plasmids were introduced into the S. lividans strains by conjugation with Escherichia coli GM2929/pUB307::Tn7 as described previously (18). To allow plasmid selection, conjugation medium was supplemented with kanamycin (25 µg/ml). Site-directed mutagenesis of rpoB(R) was performed using a QuikChange II site-directed mutagenesis kit in accordance with the instructions of the manufacturer (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). The primers used for mutagenesis were N426H-F, N426H-R, N426Y-F, N426Y-R, N426R-F, and N426R-R (Table 1). The amplification reaction consisted of 25 cycles including denaturation at 96°C for 10 s, annealing at 50°C for 5 s, and a final extension step at 60°C for 4 min. Amplification performed with the primers
18-1 and
18-2 consisted of 35 cycles including denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, annealing at 55°C for 1 min, and an extension step at 72°C for 1 min. Amplification reactions were carried out using a Cetus 480 DNA thermal cycler (PerkinElmer, Boston, MA).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Oligonucleotides used in this study
|
-32P]dCTP and [
-32P]dGTP (3,000 Ci/mmol) (31). Southern blot hybridization was performed according to standard protocols (31).
![]() View larger version (64K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Detection of duplicated rpoB genes by Southern blot hybridization. (A) Physical map of the rpoB(S) and rpoB(R) genes of Nonomuraea sp. strain ATCC 39727 with the location of the probes A and B used in Southern blot hybridization. The relative positions of the following restriction sites are indicated above the genetic map: HinfI (H) and SacI (S). (B and C) Total DNA samples extracted from S. coelicolor A3(2) 1147 (lanes 1), Amycolatopsis mediterranei S15 (lanes 2), Streptomyces albogriseolus S24 (lanes 3), Nocardia niigatensis S94 (lanes 4), Nonomuraea sp. strain ATCC 39727 (lanes 5), Nonomuraea helvata S86 (lanes 6), "Actinomadura maheshkhaliensis" S66 (lanes 7), Sphaerisporangium viridialbum S79 (lanes 8), Nonomuraea sp. strain ATCC 39727 (lanes 9), Nocardia asiatica S108 (lanes 10), "Nonomuraea terrinata" S114 (lanes 11), and "Nonomuraea terrinata" S58 (lanes 12) were digested with either SacI or HinfI, as indicated, and probed with either probe A (panel B) or probe B (panel C). Positions of molecular size standards, in base pairs, are indicated to the left of each panel.
|
Antibiotic assays. Act and Red production was determined as described previously (11). CDA was assayed according to the method of Kieser et al. (18) by using Micrococcus luteus as a test organism. Rifamycin SV was evaluated by extraction with ethyl acetate, followed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis using an octyldecyl silane 5C18-MS-II column (4.6 by 250 mm; Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan).
Isolation and identification of rifampin-resistant strains from nature. Soil samples isolated from various locations in Tsukuba, Japan, were suspended in sterilized water, and aliquots of the supernatant were plated onto glucose-yeast extract-malt extract (GYM) plates (23) containing 30 µg/ml of rifampin and 10 µg/ml of amphotericin B to suppress the growth of fungi. After a 10-day incubation at 30°C, the colonies that developed on the plates were purified by single-colony isolation and used for further analyses. The identification of each strain was performed by sequencing 16S rRNA genes with primers 16S-9F, 16S-515F, 16S-1510R, and 16S-1541R (Table 1). The strains were classified as belonging to the species with the highest degree of sequence similarity (>98% in general). The rpoB genes of actinomycetes were sequenced using primers RpoB-F and RpoB-R or ActinoRpoB-F1 and ActinoRpoB-R, while rpoC genes were sequenced using ActinoRpoC-F1 and ActinoRpoC-R1 or ActinoRpoC-F2 and ActinoRpoC-R2. The rpoA genes were sequenced using ActinoRpoA-F and ActinoRpoA-R or ActinoRpoA-F2 and ActinoRpoA-R3 (Table 1).
Analyses of the growth of and Act and Red production by S. lividans 1326, KO-421 (relC), KO-422 (relC rif1), and transconjugants harboring rpoB(R), mutagenized rpoB(R) (expressing N426Y, N426R, or N426H), or control empty vector pTYM18 in R3 or R4 liquid medium are presented in Fig. S1 in the supplemental material. The results of the microbiological assay for CDA production by S. lividans 1326, KO-421 (relC), KO-422 (relC rif1), and transconjugants harboring rpoB(R) or control empty vector pTYM18 after 96 h of growth on R3 or R4 agar medium are shown in Fig. S2 in the supplemental material. For the morphological appearance of "Nonomuraea terrinata" strains. S114 and S58 during growth on GYM agar medium at 30°C for 3 and 10 days, see Fig. S3 in the supplemental material.
|
|
|---|
18-1/
18-2 (Table 1) spanning the rpoB(R)-specific 18-bp deletion (Fig. 1C). Transconjugants thus obtained were all resistant to high levels of rifampin (up to 200 µg/ml) (Fig. 1D), suggesting that rpoB(R) was expressed in the host. The expression of rpoB(R) was further confirmed by the results of primer extension experiments. In Nonomuraea, two major developmentally regulated transcriptional start sites, TSS1 and TSS2 (Fig. 2A, lanes 3 to 6), are located 43 and 126 nt upstream of the putative translational start codon, respectively (Fig. 2B). The levels of transcripts starting at TSS2 increased markedly during late growth (168 h) (Fig. 2A, lanes 5 to 6), thereby reinforcing rpoB(R) expression during the stationary phase, consistent with the results reported previously (37). In contrast to this observation, the transcription of rpoB(R) in S. lividans transconjugants did not start at TSS2 but was strongly promoted by TSS1 (Fig. 2A, lanes 1 and 2).
![]() View larger version (57K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Features and primer extension analysis of rpoB(R) promoter region. (A) Total RNAs from two independent cultures of each S. lividans (S. liv.) rpoB(R) transconjugant (lanes 1 and 2) grown for 72 h in R3 medium or Nonomuraea sp. strain ATCC 39727 (Nonom.) grown for 72 h (lanes 3 and 4) or 168 h (lanes 5 and 6) were analyzed by primer extension using the PEX2 primer spanning nucleotides 11 to 30 from the rpoB(R) translational start codon (TTG). TSS1 and TSS2 are two major transcriptional start sites assigned in this way. (B) Features of sequence elements surrounding the transcriptional start sites TSS1 and TSS2, including (i) inverted repeats (arrows), (ii) sequences (underlined) closely matching –10 and –35 promoter elements upstream of TSS1 (consensus sequences are indicated above the underlined sequences), and (iii) sequences (underlined) closely matching –12 and –24 promoter elements upstream of TSS2 (consensus sequences are indicated above the underlined sequences). The rpoB(R) translational start codon (TTG) is also underlined.
|
![]() View larger version (79K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Phenotypes and antibiotic production of S. lividans rpoB(R) transconjugants. Phenotypes on R3 agar (A) and R4 agar (B) and the results of the microbiological assay for CDA production (C) for S. lividans 1326 (wt) and S. lividans transconjugants harboring rpoB(R), mutagenized rpoB(R) (expressing N426Y, N426R, or N426H, as indicated), or control empty vector pTYM18 are shown. All strains were grown on the plates for 96 h. – CaCl2 and + CaCl2, without and with CaCl2.
|
![]() View larger version (30K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Act and Red production by S. lividans (S. liv.) 1326, KO-421 (relC), KO-422 (relC rif1), and transconjugants harboring rpoB(R), mutagenized rpoB(R) (expressing N426Y, N426R, or N426H, as indicated), or control empty vector pTYM18 after 96 h of growth in R3 or R4 medium. –, wild type; OD, optical density.
|
To gain insight into the molecular mechanisms underlying the stimulation of secondary metabolism, we examined the ability of rpoB(R) to reactivate antibiotic biosynthesis in S. lividans KO-421, a relaxed (relC) mutant unable to produce antibiotic due to the lack of ppGpp synthesis. The effect of rpoB(R) on antibiotic production was also tested with S. lividans KO-422, a double-mutant (relC rif1) derivative of KO-421. In this strain, a rif mutation, H437Y (rif1), affecting the histidine residue corresponding to the residue that is changed to asparagine in rpoB(R) (H426N), partially restored the antibiotic-producing phenotype (11, 20). We detected the reactivation of Act, Red, and CDA production by rpoB(R) to wild-type levels in relC transconjugants grown in R3 medium (Fig. 4; also see Fig. S1 and S2 in the supplemental material). Likewise, we detected remarkable stimulation of antibiotic production in relC rpoB(R) transconjugants grown in R4 medium, in which antibiotic biosynthesis was expected to be largely independent of stringent control (Fig. 4). These results suggest the existence of an additional mechanism(s) underlying rpoB(R) stimulation, as supported by the fact that the effects of rpoB(R) on the reactivation of secondary metabolism were additive to those of rif1 (i.e., H437Y), a mutation that was suggested to mimic ppGpp binding (Fig. 4; also see Fig. S1 and S2 in the supplemental material).
Distribution of bacteria with mutant-type rpoB or duplicated rpoB in nature.
Next, we examined the frequency of the rpoB polymorphism in nature. We found that a number of colonies developed on plates containing a high concentration (30 µg/ml) of rifampin when soil samples were plated and incubated for 10 days. The frequency of rifampin-resistant isolates among total CFU was
0.1%, as determined by comparing the CFU developed on GYM plates with and without rifampin. On the basis of the 16S rRNA gene sequencing, the majority (82%) of these rifampin-resistant isolates were classified as actinomycetes, including members of the genera Streptomyces (34 species), Nocardia (9 species), Nonomuraea (9 species), Mycobacterium (4 species), Amycolatopsis (3 species), Isoptericola (2 species), Actinomadura (1 species), Kribbella (1 species), Streptosporangium (1 species), and Sphaerisporangium (1 species). Other bacteria were classified as members of the genera Pseudomonas (3 species), Mitsuaria (3 species), Acidovorax (2 species), Comamonas (2 species), Stenotrophomonas (2 species), and six other genera.
All actinomycetes isolated here (75 strains) were subjected to rpoB sequencing focusing on rif clusters. As expected, several strains (S14, S15, S18, S24, S36, S57, S65, S108, and S114) were found to have mutant-type rpoB (Table 2). These Rifr rpoB paralogs revealed high levels of similarity (80.4% in Nocardia asiatica S108 to 98.3% in Streptomyces vinaceus S36) to the endogenous Rifs rpoB gene in S. lividans. The remaining rifampin-resistant actinomycetes had no changes in their rif clusters. The mutations N442Y (in S24), H437Y (in S36), and H437Q (in S108) were especially notable, as these mutations were reported previously to cause rifampin resistance in S. lividans or S. coelicolor (11, 39). Strains S14, S15, and S108 were characterized by mutations at multiple amino acid positions. It is also notable that S14 and S15 were classified as species known to be rifamycin producers and that these two strains actually produced rifamycin SV, as determined by HPLC analysis (data not shown). In addition, five strains (S58, S66, S79, S86, and S94) classified as belonging to Nonomuraea, Nocardia, Actinomadura, or Sphaerisporangium showed polymorphism of the rpoB gene, which consisted of wild-type rpoB and mutant-type rpoB (Table 2). Polymorphism of rpoB genes was also analyzed by Southern hybridization. Preliminarily, we tested a number of restriction endonucleases (BamHI, BglII, HinfI, KpnI, SacI, SalI, and PstI), selecting those that were able to cleave the DNA from all strains and demonstrated polymorphic cleavage sites within rpoB on the basis of the Southern hybridization data. In the analysis presented in Fig. 5, total DNA from the actinomycete strains was digested with either SacI or HinfI and probed with either a 565-bp (probe A) (Fig. 5B) or an 856-bp (probe B) (Fig. 5C) rpoB-specific DNA fragment. As the two probes were contiguous (although with partial overlap) on the physical map of the rpoB gene (Fig. 5A), the detection of two (or more) identical bands with both probes was indicative of the occurrence of two (or more) alleles. This analysis confirmed the rpoB duplication in S58, S66, S79, S86, and S94. On the other hand, no duplication of rpoA (coding for the RNAP
-subunit) and rpoC (coding for the RNAP β'-subunit) was found, as determined preliminarily by the sequencing of these genes. Thus, rpoB mutant forms are widely distributed among actinomycetes, while the mutant-type rpoB with polymorphism appears to be distributed preferentially in the so-called rare actinomycetes. It is also notable that all rifampin-resistant isolates thus obtained (with the exception of Kribbella aluminosa) were able to produce antibiotics (Table 2).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. List of actinomycetes with mutant-type rpoB or duplicated rpoB isolated from soila
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Growth of and aerial mycelium formation and antibiotic production by Nonomuraea terrinata strains S114 and S58 under various culture conditions
|
|
|
|---|
The clusters of mutations in rpoB that confer rifampin resistance were initially discovered in E. coli by Jin and Gross (14, 16). While our results seem to have immediate industrial applications, the molecular mechanisms responsible for the observed phenomena are not completely understood. Most rpoB(R)-specific missense mutations affect residues evolutionarily conserved in all prokaryotes and are predicted to modify the structure-function relationships of the RNAP β-chain subunit. Thus, rif cluster-associated mutations frequently alter promoter clearance, transcript elongation, and transcription termination (15, 16, 19, 21). It is worth noting the presence of both H426N (rif cluster I) and S474Y (rif cluster II) missense mutations in the corresponding regions of rpoB2 from Nocardia farcinica, an actinomycete that shares with Nonomuraea sp. strain ATCC 39727 the distinction of having two rpoB paralogs (rpoB and rpoB2) (13).
Another interesting point is the physiological significance of rpoB duplication in these prokaryotes. In Nocardia farcinica, as well as in other Nocardia species, rpoB duplication has been shown previously to contribute to rifampin resistance. As certain rif mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis have been shown to reduce the growth rate, it has been suggested that such disadvantages can be minimized by carrying both the wild-type rpoB and a mutant rpoB [rpoB(R) or rpoB2] (13). However, the more intriguing possibility is that rpoB duplication may contribute to the developmental strategy of several actinomycetes. This hypothesis is supported by the observation that rpoB(R) transcription is tightly regulated during Nonomuraea growth (Fig. 2) and that the constitutive expression of this gene increases the production of the glycopeptide antibiotic A40926 in this organism (37). The greater capabilities for aerial mycelium formation (and thus sporulation) and antibiotic production observed in "Nonomuraea terrinata" strain S58 with a duplicated rpoB gene (Table 3) also appear to support this hypothesis.
It was rather surprising that rpoB gene polymorphism was detected frequently among rifampin-resistant actinomycetes isolated from nature (5 of 75 strains), although it was preferentially distributed in rare actinomycetes (not Streptomyces spp.) (Table 2). This finding suggests that these rare actinomycetes have utilized this polymorphism to survive in nature by elegantly adjusting the gene expression as discussed above. From this viewpoint, it is notable that rifamycin producer strains S14 and S15 had a rif cluster sequence distinguished from those of other actinomycetes (Table 2). It is also intriguing to examine whether various rpoB(R) forms found in nature (including the five rpoB(R) forms found in this study) exhibit greater capabilities to activate the bacterial dormant genes than the Nonomuraea sp. strain ATCC 39727 rpoB(R). Thus, understanding the natural rpoB status and its utilization for dormant gene activation appears to provide new horizons for medical and industrial microbiology.
We thank Shinya Kodani for his kind collaboration in identifying rifamycin SV by HPLC analysis.
Published ahead of print on 1 December 2008. ![]()
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://jb.asm.org/. ![]()
|
|
|---|
29-PALG-32 mutation leads to reduced expression of the regulatory genes ccaR and claR and very low transcription of the ceaS2 gene for clavulanic acid biosynthesis in Streptomyces clavuligerus. Mol. Microbiol. 61:758-770.[CrossRef][Medline]This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»