This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wagner, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Koraimann, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wagner, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Koraimann, G.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Bacteriology, March 2009, p. 1695-1702, Vol. 191, No. 5
0021-9193/09/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JB.01536-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Growth Phase- and Cell Division-Dependent Activation and Inactivation of the {sigma}32 Regulon in Escherichia coli{triangledown} ,{dagger}

Maria Anna Wagner, Doris Zahrl,{ddagger} Gernot Rieser, and Günther Koraimann*

Institut für Molekulare Biowissenschaften, Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz, Humboldtstrasse 50, A-8010 Graz, Austria

Received 30 October 2008/ Accepted 16 December 2008


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
Alternative sigma factors allow bacteria to reprogram global transcription rapidly and to adapt to changes in the environment. Here we report on growth- and cell division-dependent {sigma}32 regulon activity in Escherichia coli in batch culture. By analyzing {sigma}32 expression in growing cells, an increase in {sigma}32 protein levels is observed during the first round of cell division after exit from stationary phase. Increased {sigma}32 protein levels result from transcriptional activation of the rpoH gene. After the first round of bulk cell division, rpoH transcript levels and {sigma}32 protein levels decrease again. The late-logarithmic phase and the transition to stationary phase are accompanied by a second increase in {sigma}32 levels and enhanced stability of {sigma}32 protein but not by enhanced transcription of rpoH. Throughout growth, {sigma}32 target genes show expression patterns consistent with oscillating {sigma}32 protein levels. However, during the transition to early-stationary phase, despite high {sigma}32 protein levels, the transcription of {sigma}32 target genes is downregulated, suggesting functional inactivation of {sigma}32. It is deduced from these data that there may be a link between {sigma}32 regulon activity and cell division events. Further support for this hypothesis is provided by the observation that in cells in which FtsZ is depleted, {sigma}32 regulon activation is suppressed.


arrow
INTRODUCTION
 
In Escherichia coli the regulation of the {sigma}32 stress regulon, induced by heat shock or other stress conditions, has been extensively studied (15, 17, 31, 41). It is commonly accepted that environmental cues, such as elevated temperature or other conditions disturbing protein homeostasis, cause the accumulation of misfolded proteins and lead to transcriptional activation of stress genes encoding heat shock proteins (HSPs). HSPs are mainly chaperones and proteases that work in concert to maintain the structural and functional integrity of all living cells. To activate this response pathway, E. coli uses the alternative sigma factor {sigma}32, which binds to core RNA polymerase to recognize {sigma}32-specific promoters and initiate the transcription of about 90 genes, e.g., dnaK, groESL, and hslU (27). Regulation of the heat shock response is accomplished at different levels, affecting {sigma}32 transcription, translation, protein stability, and activity (10, 11, 20, 33, 34). Two major chaperones, DnaK and GroEL, are involved not only in protein refolding/degradation but also in the regulation of {sigma}32 (15, 34). In the absence of cellular stress and when cells adapt to stress conditions, DnaK and GroEL bind to {sigma}32 and mediate its rapid degradation by the protease FtsH, a member of the AAA+ protease family (17, 33). Given the relatively slow degradation of {sigma}32 by FtsH in vitro, the involvement of a still unknown factor in chaperone-mediated {sigma}32 degradation in vivo has been postulated (39).

Many HSPs, such as GroEL (Hsp60) and DnaK (Hsp70), are essential for cellular survival under all growth conditions, and it has been shown that {sigma}32 is essential for growth and cell division above 20°C (42). Moreover, a temperature-sensitive variant of {sigma}32 (35) displays cell division defects at the nonpermissive temperature. Deletion of dnaK results in filamentous growth (5, 19); overexpression of DnaK leads to a cell division and growth defect (4). It has recently been shown that GroE-depleted E. coli cells grow in filaments as a consequence of impaired folding of the cell division protein FtsE (12). It has also been proposed that GroEL localizes to a midcell position in an FtsZ-dependent manner and has a role in cell division (28). All these observations suggest a link between the {sigma}32 regulon and cell division.

However, activation of the heat shock regulon by cell division has never been demonstrated in E. coli, in contrast to the alphaproteobacterium Caulobacter crescentus, where expression of the groESL operon was found to be cell cycle controlled (1). During the past few years, major advances in the knowledge of prokaryotic cell division have been achieved (reviewed in references 6, 30, and 37). A picture emerges that shows that the process of prokaryotic cytokinesis is highly regulated and requires the coordinated activity of cytoskeletal proteins that guide the synthesis and rearrangements of the cell envelope, including localized peptidoglycan synthesis (6, 30, 37). To shed some light on a possible growth phase- and cell-cycle-dependent activation of the {sigma}32 regulon in E. coli, we monitored the levels of {sigma}32 protein, the transcription of several {sigma}32-dependent genes, and the activity of the {sigma}32-controlled groESL promoter. Our results show that the {sigma}32 regulon of E. coli is highly responsive to growth phases and oscillates during exponential growth. Our results further indicate that the first round of cell division after exit from stationary phase triggers a transient activation of the {sigma}32 regulon by enhanced transcription of rpoH. This activation occurs during cytokinesis, because we found that {sigma}32 activation is suppressed by depletion of the essential tubulin-like cell division protein FtsZ. In late-exponential phase, {sigma}32 protein is stabilized compared to its status during early-logarithmic growth, leading to a second peak of heat shock gene expression. When cells transit to stationary phase, {sigma}32-dependent genes are rapidly inactivated despite the presence of high levels of full-length {sigma}32 protein. At this stage, a stable degradation product of {sigma}32 becomes apparent. Given the fact that {sigma}32 is essential for the growth of E. coli at temperatures that are physiologically relevant (e.g., 37°C), we propose that the activation of {sigma}32 after exit from stationary phase reactivates bacterial cells for normal progression through the cell cycle. On the other hand, the transition to stationary phase involves {sigma}32 inactivation by a mechanism distinct from {sigma}32 degradation.


arrow
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 
Bacterial strains and growth conditions. The sequenced E. coli K-12 laboratory strain MG1655 (F {lambda} ilvG rfb-50 rph-1) (3) was used for quantitative mRNA measurements and protein level determinations. For β-galactosidase assays, the MC4100 derivative SR6618 [MC4100 {phi} (groESL::lacZ)], equivalent to SR4499 (20), generously provided by S. Raina, was used. Stationary-phase cultures (optical density at 600 nm [OD600], 2.5 to 3.5) of these strains were obtained after growth for 20 to 24 h at 37°C in M9 minimal medium (26) supplemented with 3 g/liter Casamino Acids, 5 mM MgSO4, and 0.2% glucose. For all experiments, 10 ml of stationary-phase cultures in 100-ml Erlenmeyer flasks was prepared. For all experiments, unless otherwise indicated, 200 ml fresh, prewarmed M9 medium in a 1-liter Erlenmeyer flask was inoculated 1:30 with stationary-phase cells and incubated at 37°C in a shaking water bath (113 rpm). For β-galactosidase assays, 50-ml cultures were prepared. If appropriate, 10 µg/ml chloramphenicol or 5 µg/ml cefotaxime was added. For β-galactosidase assays and the corresponding growth curves, 50 ml of M9 medium in a 300-ml Erlenmeyer flask was inoculated 1:30 with stationary-phase cells.

Cell number determinations. Cells were fixed directly in growth medium with 2.8% formaldehyde and 0.04% glutaraldehyde and were stored at 4°C. Fixed cells were counted using a CASY cell counter, model TTC (Innovatis AG, Reutlingen, Germany) with a 45-µm capillary.

Microscopy and cell length analyses. Aliquots of the cultures were harvested at the given time points by centrifugation. Cells were washed with PBS buffer (200 mM sodium phosphate buffer [pH 7.2], 150 mM NaCl) and fixed with 2.8% formaldehyde and 0.04% glutaraldehyde in PBS buffer for 15 min at room temperature (8). Cells were washed three times with PBS buffer, resuspended in an appropriate volume of PBS buffer, spotted onto glass slides coated with poly-L-lysine (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), and incubated for 10 min before the supernatant was removed. For phase-contrast microscopy, a Zeiss Axioscope equipped with a 100x oil immersion objective was used. Cell lengths were determined by analyzing phase-contrast images using the Metamorph (version 5.1) software package (Molecular Devices, Downingtown, PA).

Western blot analysis. Cells were harvested by centrifugation for 5 min at 4°C and 4,200 x g. Whole-cell lysates were separated on 12.5% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gels, and proteins were electrotransferred to an Immobilon P nitrocellulose membrane (Millipore, Bedford, MA). Primary antibodies against RNA polymerase subunits {sigma}32, {sigma}70, and {sigma}S were purchased from Neoclone (Madison, WI) and used at a 1:2,000 dilution in 1x TST (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween 20) containing 1% dry milk powder. The FtsZ antibody was a kind gift from Tanneke Den Blaauwen. As a secondary antibody, a peroxidase-conjugated antibody against mouse immunoglobulin G (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, England) or against rabbit immunoglobulin G (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) was used at a 1:15,000 dilution, and the Amersham ECL system (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, England) was used for detection. Chemiluminescence signals were detected with AGFA Curix Ultra UV-G X-ray film (Agfa-Gevaert, Mortsel, Belgium) and were quantitated using a Molecular Dynamics densitometer and ImageQuant (version 5.1) software (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA).

In vivo stability of {sigma}32. The degradation of {sigma}32 in E. coli cultures was monitored by Western blot analysis essentially as described previously (36). E. coli MG1655 was grown at 37°C as described above for growth experiments, and at the indicated time points (90, 180, and 210 min after inoculation), 200 µg/ml chloramphenicol was added to aliquots (50 ml) of the culture to stop protein synthesis. Cells were further incubated at 37°C, and 1.35-ml samples were taken at 10- or 30-s intervals and immediately precipitated with 10% trichloroacetic acid on ice for 30 min. After centrifugation for 15 min at 4°C and 14,000 x g, the pellets were washed with acetone and resuspended in 1x FSB (0.12 M dithiothreitol, 2% [wt/vol] SDS, 0.06 M Tris-HCl [pH 6.8], 8.7% [vol/vol] glycerol, 0.004% [wt/vol] bromophenol blue), and aliquots corresponding to 0.3 OD unit were subjected to Western blot analysis with anti-{sigma}32 as described above.

RNA isolation. At the given time points after inoculation, cells were harvested by centrifugation at 4°C for 4 min and 4,200 x g, quickly frozen in liquid nitrogen, and subsequently stored at –70°C. Total RNA was isolated with the RNeasy minikit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer's protocol. RNA concentrations were determined photometrically.

Northern blot analyses. Northern blot analysis was performed as described previously (40). In brief, 5 µg total RNA was denatured at 65°C in loading buffer containing formaldehyde and ethidium bromide, separated on a 1.2% agarose gel, and transferred to an Amersham Hybond-N membrane (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, England). Hybridization was performed with alkali-labile digoxigenin-11-dUTP-labeled probes diluted in DIG Easy Hyb (Roche Applied Science, Penzberg, Germany) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The oligonucleotides for PCR synthesis of the probes are listed in Table 1. After hybridization at 50°C, detection was performed using an alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-digoxigenin Fab fragment and ready-to-use CSPD (Roche Applied Science, Penzberg, Germany) as a substrate for the alkaline phosphatase. Chemiluminescence signals were detected with AGFA Curix Ultra UV-G X-ray film (Agfa-Gevaert, Mortsel, Belgium) and quantitated using a Molecular Dynamics densitometer and ImageQuant (version 5.1) software (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. Oligonucleotides

q-RT-PCR. Quantitative reverse transcription real-time PCR (q-RT-PCR) analysis of total RNA was performed in a RotorGene 6000 machine (Corbett Life Science, Sydney, Australia) using the SensiMix one-step kit (Quantace, London, United Kingdom) in combination with the dually labeled oligonucleotide probes (with 6-carboxyfluorescein [FAM] or 6-carboxy-1,4-dichloro-2',4',5',7'-tetra-chlorofluorescein (HEX) at the 5' end and black hole quencher 1 (BHQ-1) at the 3' end) listed in Table 1. For primer and probe design, Primer3 software, which is available online (http://frodo.wi.mit.edu/cgi-bin/primer3/primer3_www.cgi) (29), was used. Two sets of primers/probes were used in one reaction, with one probe labeled with FAM and the other with HEX. Total RNA was isolated as described for Northern blot analyses. To remove traces of DNA, DNase I digestion was performed. One microgram of total RNA was incubated for 30 min at 37°C with 1 U DNase I (Fermentas, Burlington, Canada) in the appropriate buffer with MgCl2. The incubation was stopped by the addition of EDTA to a final concentration of 2.5 mM and further incubation at 65°C for 10 min. q-RT PCR was performed in a total volume of 10 µl containing 4 ng of DNase I-treated RNA, the 2x SensiMix one-step mix, 5 mM MgCl2, 200 nM each primer, 100 nM each probe, and 2 U of RNase inhibitor. Relative mRNA concentrations, representing the change in gene expression compared to expression at a selected time point, were determined using the 2{Delta}CT method as described elsewhere (23). In short, the threshold cycle (CT) of stationary-phase samples was subtracted from the CT of each time point, resulting in –{Delta}CT. Relative concentrations were calculated as 2{Delta}CT.

β-Galactosidase assays. The β-galactosidase activity of strain SR6618 was determined by the method in reference 26, with the modifications described in reference 40. Kinetic measurements to determine the change in optical density at 420 nm multiplied by 1,000 per min per OD600 unit ({Delta}mOD420/min/OD600) during the linear increase in absorption were taken in 96-well microtiter plates using a Bio-Rad microplate reader, model 550 (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA).

Cloning of dicF. The DNA sequence encoding the DicF antisense RNA was PCR amplified from the MG1655 genome (GenBank accession no. U00096; region 1647239 to 1647689) using oligonucleotides dicF_ecor1_fw and dicF_hind3_rev, listed in Table 1. The dicF sequence was ligated into plasmid pGZ119EH (22) at the EcoRI and HindIII restriction sites, resulting in plasmid pGZdicF. Transcription of DicF antisense RNA was induced from the tac promoter by the addition of 70 µM isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) to the growth medium.


arrow
RESULTS
 
{sigma}32 protein levels during the growth cycle of E. coli. To gain insight into the role of the alternative sigma factor {sigma}32 in cells grown in batch cultures under nonstress conditions, we asked if {sigma}32 responds to changes in the physiological status of the cells and if its level varies during the growth cycle. The growth characteristics and cell lengths of E. coli MG1655 grown in minimal medium at 37°C were determined (Fig. 1). During a relatively short period, the number of cells doubled from 1 x 108 per ml to 2 x 108 per ml (Fig. 1 A, 75 min and 105 min, respectively), suggesting that at 105 min, most cells had completed the first round of cell division after exit from stationary phase. This conclusion is corroborated by the fact that cell lengths increased only until 90 min and then decreased sharply by 105 min (Fig. 1B). A logarithmic increase in the cell mass, with a doubling time of 50 min, was observed until 165 min. The transition to stationary phase began after 165 min and was accompanied by a decline in the growth rate, the appearance of {sigma}S (Fig. 2), longer generation times, and continuous shortening of cells (Fig. 1; see also Fig. S1 in the supplemental material).


Figure 1
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 1. Growth characteristics of a batch culture of E. coli MG1655. Late-stationary-phase cells grown in M9 minimal medium at 37°C for at least 20 h were taken and inoculated into fresh, prewarmed M9 medium. (A) Growth curves showing increases in cell mass (OD600) and in cell numbers (cells/ml) as determined by counting cells in a cell counter. Data shown are averages for at least three independent experiments. (B) Box-and-whisker plot representing cell length distributions. Cell lengths were determined by morphometric analyses of phase-contrast microscopic images. At least 150 cells were measured per time point. Boxes represent the cell length distribution of 50% of all measured cells; horizontal lines within boxes represent median cell lengths. After a short lag phase of approximately 15 min, cells start to grow and elongate. Cell lengths reach a maximum at 90 min, reflecting the time point before the majority of the cells divide for the first time (between 90 and 105 min). The 165-min time point marks the end of exponential growth and the beginning of the transition to stationary phase. S, stationary phase.


Figure 2
View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 2. {sigma}32, {sigma}70, and {sigma}S protein levels during a growth cycle of E. coli MG1655 in M9 medium. (A) Cells were harvested at the indicated time points, and whole-cell lysates corresponding to 0.2 OD600 unit (~3 x 108 cells) were subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and Western blotting with antibodies specific for {sigma}32, {sigma}70, or {sigma}S. Increased amounts of {sigma}32 are detectable at 60 to 90 min and again at 165 min and later. {sigma}70 protein levels show a distinctly different pattern, remaining similar throughout the growth cycle. The appearance of {sigma}S correlates with the transition to stationary phase and reaches a maximum at 195 min. (B) For quantification, Western blot signals were normalized to the amount of protein loaded. Bars represent the relative abundances of {sigma}32 and {sigma}70. S, stationary phase.

To determine {sigma}32 protein levels, cells were harvested at different time points during the growth cycle and whole-cell lysates were subjected to Western blot analysis (Fig. 2A). In the stationary and early-logarithmic phases, no {sigma}32 protein, or very little, could be detected. At 90 min, {sigma}32 abundance had increased at least fourfold over that at 30 min. Note that at 90 min, average cell lengths reached a maximum, suggesting that most cells were in a stage just prior to cell separation. This observation suggested that cell division after exit from stationary phase has an impact on the {sigma}32 stress response pathway. After the first {sigma}32 peak, the {sigma}32 protein level decreased during continuing logarithmic growth (and following cell divisions). A second peak in {sigma}32 abundance was reached at 165 min, corresponding to the end of logarithmic phase. During the transition to stationary phase, cell growth slowed down, but cell numbers still increased (Fig. 1A). {sigma}32 protein levels gradually increased during further progression into stationary phase. Interestingly, a degradation intermediate of {sigma}32 appeared. We termed this stable degradation intermediate RpoH* (Fig. 2A). In addition to the examination of {sigma}32 levels, we monitored {sigma}70, the housekeeping sigma factor in E. coli, to rule out any general effect of growth phases on protein levels. In contrast to those of {sigma}32, levels of {sigma}70 did not oscillate during logarithmic growth (Fig. 2A). Quantification of the signals obtained by Western blotting demonstrated that {sigma}70 protein levels increased by a factor of 2 to 3 after the first round of cell division and then diminished when the cells entered stationary phase (Fig. 2B). As expected, and as shown by others (21, 38), the stationary-phase-specific sigma factor {sigma}S appeared only during the transition to stationary phase or in stationary phase (Fig. 2A). To show that the observed activation-and-inactivation pattern of {sigma}32 was dependent on growth phases, but not on the growth rate, a time course experiment similar to that described above was performed in M9 minimal medium at 30°C (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material). Despite a much longer doubling time (~100 min), {sigma}32 was barely detectable in freshly inoculated cells that were growing but not yet dividing. {sigma}32 abundance increased at the time when the first round of cell division was proceeding. Again, the transition to stationary phase was accompanied by increased {sigma}32 levels and the appearance of a stable degradation intermediate of {sigma}32. From the results described above, we conclude that {sigma}32 not only responds to stress stimuli, such as heat, but is subjected to growth phase- and cell division-dependent regulation.

The transcription of rpoH is upregulated during the first round of cell division. To elucidate if the increased steady-state level of {sigma}32 during the first round of cell division after exit from stationary phase is a result of increased transcription of rpoH or enhanced stability of {sigma}32, we measured the abundance of rpoH transcripts and the stability of the {sigma}32 protein (Fig. 3). Northern blot analysis with rpoH-specific probes revealed a three- to fivefold increase in the rpoH mRNA level during cell division (90 min) over that in predivisional cells (30 min) (Fig. 3A). Since during heat shock, transcriptional activation of the rpoH promoters plays a minor role but {sigma}32 activation is achieved mainly through increased {sigma}32 stability (31), we also investigated whether {sigma}32 protein stability was enhanced. This was done by measuring {sigma}32 protein half-lives after inhibition of protein synthesis (Fig. 3B and C). Surprisingly, calculated half-lives were extremely short (15 s for 90-min cultures). Thus, our results indicate that the increase in {sigma}32 levels observed during the first round of cell division after the exit from stationary phase results not from protein stabilization but from transcriptional activation of rpoH. Elevated {sigma}32 levels during the transition to stationary phase most likely are due to increased {sigma}32 protein stability. The half-life of {sigma}32 at 180 min (30 s) was found to be double that at 90 min (Fig. 3B and C).


Figure 3
View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 3. (A) rpoH mRNA levels. Total RNA was isolated from E. coli MG1655 at the indicated time points (in minutes) during a growth cycle, and Northern blot analysis was performed. Analysis of 23S rRNA, used as a loading control, is shown in the lower panel. For quantification, rpoH signals were normalized to the amount of RNA loaded. Numbers at the bottom represent the rpoH mRNA level at each time point relative to the level at 120 min. S, stationary phase. (B and C) {sigma}32 protein stability. (B) {sigma}32 degradation after inhibition of protein synthesis. Aliquots from 90- and 180-min cultures were taken at the indicated time points (seconds) after inhibition of protein synthesis. {sigma}32 was detected by Western blotting. A star (*) marks the stable degradation product of {sigma}32. (C) Amounts of {sigma}32 plotted versus time. Values were used to determine the half-lives (t1/2) of {sigma}32 in cells from 90-min and 180-min cultures.

Transcription of {sigma}32-dependent stress genes during the growth cycle of E. coli. Increased levels of {sigma}32 protein in E. coli cells should lead to increased transcription from {sigma}32-dependent promoters. To investigate the activity of {sigma}32 during the growth cycle, we monitored the transcription of representative members of the {sigma}32 regulon. Total RNA was isolated from E. coli MG1655 cells, grown as described above, at different time points, and Northern blot analyses with specific probes were performed to detect {sigma}32-dependent mRNAs. As can be seen in Fig. 4, the levels of groESL, dnaK, and hslU mRNAs mirror the levels of {sigma}32 during growth except when the cells transit to stationary phase (see below). During late-stationary phase and up to 30 min after inoculation, the tested mRNAs were not detectable except for a faint signal corresponding to dnaK mRNA in stationary phase. The first signals corresponding to groESL, dnaK, and hslU mRNAs could be seen from 45 to 60 min, followed by pronounced increases at 75 min, corresponding to the onset of cell division after exit from stationary phase (Fig. 4A). Quantification of Northern blots revealed a three- to fourfold increase in the level of groESL mRNA in cells that had started to divide (75 min and 90 min) over that in cells prior to cell division (Fig. 4B). This burst in {sigma}32-dependent mRNA levels occurred simultaneously with the three- to fourfold increase in the level of {sigma}32 protein (Fig. 2), indicating that the increased transcription of the {sigma}32 regulon is a direct consequence of increased {sigma}32 levels. At 120 min, the time when most cells had completed the first round of cell division, mRNA dropped to levels comparable to those observed in predivisional cells. Again, this decrease corresponds well to the observed low level of {sigma}32 at 120 min. A second maximum was reached at 150 min and continued until 180 min, when cells transited to stationary phase. All mRNA levels measured decreased at 195 min and became undetectable at 360 min. Until 180 min, a good correlation exists between {sigma}32 protein levels and {sigma}32-dependent mRNA levels. However, beginning with 195 min, mRNA levels of {sigma}32-dependent genes and {sigma}32 protein levels diverged (compare Fig. 2 and 4). Whereas the transcription of {sigma}32-dependent genes dropped markedly, {sigma}32 protein levels remained high. These findings suggest that during early-stationary phase, {sigma}32 protein is present as a more stable yet functionally inactive form. There are several possibilities for how {sigma}32 may become inactivated in early-stationary phase (see Discussion).


Figure 4
View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 4. Growth cycle-dependent oscillation of mRNA levels of {sigma}32-controlled genes in E. coli MG1655. (A) Total RNA was isolated at the given time points and analyzed by Northern blotting. groESL, dnaK, and hslU mRNAs show similar fluctuation patterns during the course of the growth experiment. Transcript levels are low or below the detection limit in stationary phase, and an increase in the abundance of each transcript can be observed at 45 min, with a first peak at 75 to 90 min. After a decline with a minimum at 120 min, concomitant with the completion of the first round of cell division by most cells in the culture, a second peak appears at 150 min. The transition to stationary phase and the following reduction in cell division activity are accompanied by a marked reduction in transcript levels. 23S rRNA from the ethidium bromide-stained agarose gel is shown as a loading control. (B) Graphical representation of quantitated mRNA levels, showing the oscillation of the levels of {sigma}32-dependent transcripts. The level of each mRNA at 120 min was set to 1. Experiments performed at least in triplicate produced similar results; one representative result is shown. S, stationary phase.

To confirm that the observed expression pattern of {sigma}32-dependent genes was specific, we determined the expression of a {sigma}70-dependent gene. For that purpose, we chose the {sigma}70-controlled gene rpoA, which encodes the RNA polymerase {alpha} subunit. By using q-RT-PCR, the relative expression of rpoA mRNA was determined and compared to the {sigma}32-dependent expression of groESL mRNA. As can be seen in Fig. 5, rpoA and groESL showed completely different expression patterns. rpoA mRNA was highly induced as early as 30 min after inoculation into fresh medium (about 40-fold compared to stationary phase). We interpreted this as a response to the nutritional upshift and the concomitant burst of metabolic activity. Most notably, at that time point, {sigma}32-dependent groESL mRNA levels were still very low, close to the levels observed during stationary phase. At later time points, the rpoA mRNA level decreased gradually during growth, in sharp contrast to the oscillating pattern determined for groESL mRNA. During the transition to stationary phase (180 min), mRNA levels diminished further and finally reached stationary-phase levels (Fig. 5). This result shows that the observed growth phase-dependent expression pattern of {sigma}32 regulon members is specific and—during exponential phase—completely different from the expression pattern of a typical {sigma}70-dependent gene. Activation of the {sigma}32 regulon occurs at the time when cells start to divide after recovery from stationary phase, followed by reduced {sigma}32 activity after the first round of cell division and a second activation during late-exponential phase.


Figure 5
View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 5. q-RT-PCR analysis of mRNA levels of {sigma}70- and {sigma}32-regulated genes in E. coli MG1655 shows that the observed oscillation pattern is specific for {sigma}32-regulated genes. Total RNA was isolated at the time points shown. q-RT-PCR was performed, and the change in gene expression relative to that in stationary phase was calculated. The expression levels of rpoA ({sigma}70 dependent) and groESL ({sigma}32 dependent) mRNAs were distinctly different. A nutritional upshift caused an upregulation of rpoA expression (30 min, compared to stationary phase) whereas groESL expression was not affected by a nutritional upshift but oscillated in a pattern that correlated with cell division events. S, stationary phase.

Activation of the {sigma}32-dependent groESL promoter. To directly monitor the activation of a well-characterized {sigma}32-dependent promoter, we used E. coli SR6618, a strain with a chromosomally integrated groESL::lacZ-fusion (20). groESL promoter activity was found to be very low from 15 to 60 min after cells were inoculated into fresh medium (Fig. 6). Ninety minutes after inoculation, groESL promoter activity increased two- to threefold, corresponding to the initiation of cell division in these cultures. This finding further confirmed our conclusions that the high mRNA levels of groESL (and of the other heat shock gene mRNAs investigated) that we observed during the first round of cell division after exit from stationary phase resulted from increased transcription from {sigma}32-dependent promoters. β-Galactosidase activity increased further until the transition into stationary phase. Consistent with reduced {sigma}32 levels and reduced mRNA levels of {sigma}32-controlled genes, a reduction in β-galactosidase activity was observed during early stationary phase. In contrast to the dynamic changes in groESL, dnaK, and hslU mRNA levels, the comparatively long half-life of the reporter enzyme β-galactosidase did not allow oscillations in promoter activity to be detected. Nevertheless, a first burst of promoter activity during the first round of cell division after exit from stationary phase and a second burst at the end of exponential growth can be clearly seen.


Figure 6
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 6. Transcriptional activation of the {sigma}32-controlled groESL promoter. Expression from the groESL promoter was determined using the E. coli groESL::lacZ reporter strain SR6618 and β-galactosidase assays. A significant increase in β-galactosidase levels ({blacktriangleup}) (P < 0.05) was observed between 60 and 90 min. Cell division was monitored by determination of cell counts (*) (cells/ml). Promoter activity is given as {Delta}mOD420/min/OD600. Means and standard deviations for three independent experiments, with each sample measured in duplicate, are plotted.

Depletion of FtsZ completely abolishes the activation of the {sigma}32 regulon. Since the activation of the {sigma}32 regulon coincided with the start of cell division, we reasoned that cell division itself is the "stress signal" for the {sigma}32 stress response. We predicted that inhibition of cell division would reduce or even abolish this cytoplasmic stress response. To test this hypothesis, we inhibited cell division at an early stage. This was accomplished through depletion of FtsZ, a tubulin-like cytoskeletal protein that is essential for the formation of the divisome (14, 24). FtsZ was depleted using the antisense RNA DicF, which inhibits the translation of ftsZ mRNA (32). As expected, expression of dicF from a plasmid with an inducible promoter led to cell division inhibition and filamentous growth. The filaments contained multiple clearly separated nucleoids (see Fig. S3 in the supplemental material), showing that neither DNA replication nor chromosome segregation nor elongation of cells was blocked in cells depleted of FtsZ. As expected, Western blot analysis demonstrated a specific reduction in FtsZ protein levels in cells expressing DicF antisense RNA (Fig. 7A). Concomitant with reduced FtsZ levels and a block in cell division, we observed that {sigma}32 protein was not detectable at 90 min or at 120 min (Fig. 7A). Due to low basal expression of DicF, which is in good agreement with the lower FtsZ levels in the uninduced control (Fig. 7A), the {sigma}32 response was not completely suppressed but delayed. The unchanged {sigma}70 levels show that the observed effect was specific for {sigma}32. In accordance with the absence of {sigma}32, no increase in promoter activity in the groESL::lacZ fusion strain SR6618 was detectable when dicF expression was induced (Fig. 7B). Basal expression led to a delay in groESL promoter activation, confirming the Western blot data. In contrast, transcription of a {sigma}70-controlled gene (rpoA) was not affected by the expression of DicF antisense RNA (data not shown). Our results indicate that FtsZ accumulation, subsequent FtsZ ring formation, or FtsZ ring constriction triggers {sigma}32 activation. To corroborate the effect of FtsZ depletion, we carried out an experiment in which we induced the expression of DicF during exponential growth. Figure 7C shows that {sigma}32 levels after induction of DicF in asynchronously growing cells gradually decrease with time. Finally, after 120 min, {sigma}32 is not detectable. Inhibition of cell division in these cultures was confirmed by light microscopy. Cells did not divide but formed filaments after the addition of the inducer (data not shown). This result shows that inhibition of cell division during exponential growth by FtsZ depletion also leads to a specific reduction in {sigma}32 levels.


Figure 7
View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 7. Inhibition of an early step in cell division abolishes the {sigma}32-dependent stress response in E. coli. (A) Steady-state levels of {sigma}32, FtsZ, and {sigma}70 proteins in cells expressing DicF antisense RNA (+) and in control cells with the vector (c) or the uninduced plasmid (–) were compared by Western blotting. As a loading control, a section of the Coomassie-stained gel (Co) is shown. (B) The activities of the {sigma}32-dependent groESL promoter in SR6618 expressing DicF from plasmid pGZdicF to deplete FtsZ, compared to those in controls, are shown. {blacktriangleup}, pGZdicF induced with 70 µM IPTG; {triangleup}, pGZdicF without IPTG; {square}, pGZ119EH (vector control) with 70 µM IPTG. (C) Inhibition of {sigma}32 by DicF expression in asynchronously growing cells. MG1665 harboring pGZdicF or pGZ119EH (control) was inoculated to an OD600 of 0.01 and grown to early-logarithmic phase (OD600, ~0.1). IPTG was added to induce DicF expression, and samples taken before (0) and after the addition of IPTG were analyzed by Western blotting.


arrow
DISCUSSION
 
The {sigma}32 response described here—-a transient activation of the {sigma}32 regulon during cell division after exit from stationary phase in the bacterium E. coli—is reminiscent of cell cycle-dependent oscillations of regulators and stress proteins in Caulobacter crescentus (18, 25). Hence, HSP activation during cell division may be a common theme among prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms. In gram-negative bacteria, heat shock regulon activation during cell division after exit from stationary phase may ensure that the cellular supply of chaperones and other HSPs is sufficient to sustain the necessary rearrangements, which occur mainly in the bacterial cell envelope. The reported cell division defects caused by {sigma}32 and HSP mutations support the idea that HSPs are important factors for progression through certain steps of cell division in E. coli. A direct involvement of GroEL in the folding of the cell division protein FtsE has been reported recently (12). In addition, it was shown in early investigations on {sigma}32 that an rpoH deletion strain develops filaments at normal growth temperatures (42), indicating a requirement for the heat shock sigma factor during cell division. GroEL, which is essential under all growth conditions, also confers a filamentous phenotype when depleted (12) or mutated (7). In addition, FtsZ-dependent localization of GroEL at the division site (28) may suggest that chaperones of the {sigma}32 regulon are involved in the assembly of the cytoplasmic part of the divisome. We show here that FtsZ depletion suppresses the activation of the {sigma}32 regulon. This finding again points to cell division as a key in triggering the {sigma}32 regulon. FtsZ is an essential tubulin-like cell division protein that is found in almost all bacterial species. In rod-shaped cells, FtsZ polymerizes after chromosome replication and segregation at the cytoplasmic membrane at midcell and forms a ring structure, the Z-ring (2). The E. coli Z-ring acts as a scaffold for at least 10 additional proteins that assemble into a cytokinetic machinery, the divisome (13). Our observations suggest that the divisome at some stage generates a signal that is transmitted to the {sigma}32 regulon. Since our analyses of the half-life of {sigma}32 during the first round of cell division at 90 min did not reveal increased stability compared to that of heat-shocked cells or to that at later time points, we concluded that the observed increased transcription of rpoH is mainly responsible for increased {sigma}32 levels during cell division after exit from stationary phase. Since transcription from the rpoH P1 promoter is positively affected by phosphorylated CpxR (40) and transcription from the P3 promoter is strictly {sigma}E dependent (9), transcriptional activation of both promoters elicited by cytokinetically induced envelope stress could account for the increased rpoH mRNA levels during cell division. This hypothesis, however, remains to be tested.

A second important observation is the functional inactivation of {sigma}32 when cells in the batch culture transit to stationary phase. Despite high {sigma}32 levels, transcription of {sigma}32-dependent genes rapidly diminishes to low levels. Functional inactivation of {sigma}32 can be achieved by sequestration by the chaperonin DnaK, which binds with high affinity to {sigma}32, or by phosphorylation of {sigma}32 (20, 34). Alternatively, the observed stable truncated fragment of {sigma}32, which lacks approximately 60 N-terminal amino acids (unpublished observations), may interfere with the function of full-length {sigma}32. Functional inactivation of {sigma}32 coincides with the appearance of {sigma}S, the sigma factor that governs the transcription of genes during stationary phase (16). Further investigations in our laboratory are aimed at understanding how {sigma}32 is functionally inactivated during this transition phase from growing and dividing to nongrowing and nondividing cells.


arrow
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank S. Raina for providing strain SR6618 and for helpful suggestions and T. den Blaauwen for the gift of the FtsZ antiserum. We thank J. Reidl for critical reading of the manuscript.

This work was funded by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF), project P17857-B12.


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institut für Molekulare Biowissenschaften, Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz, Humboldtstrasse 50, A-8010 Graz, Austria. Phone: 43 (316) 380 5620. Fax: 43 (316) 380 9898. E-mail: guenther.koraimann{at}uni-graz.at Back

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 29 December 2008. Back

{dagger} Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://jb.asm.org/. Back

{ddagger} Present address: Roche Diagnostics Graz GmbH, Kratkystrasse 2, A-8020 Graz, Austria. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Avedissian, M., and S. Lopes Gomes. 1996. Expression of the groESL operon is cell-cycle controlled in Caulobacter crescentus. Mol. Microbiol. 19:79-89.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. 2
  3. Bi, E. F., and J. Lutkenhaus. 1991. FtsZ ring structure associated with division in Escherichia coli. Nature 354:161-164.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. 3
  5. Blattner, F. R., G. Plunkett III, C. A. Bloch, N. T. Perna, V. Burland, M. Riley, J. Collado-Vides, J. D. Glasner, C. K. Rode, G. F. Mayhew, J. Gregor, N. W. Davis, H. A. Kirkpatrick, M. A. Goeden, D. J. Rose, B. Mau, and Y. Shao. 1997. The complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli K-12. Science 277:1453-1474.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. 4
  7. Blum, P., J. Ory, J. Bauernfeind, and J. Krska. 1992. Physiological consequences of DnaK and DnaJ overproduction in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 174:7436-7444.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. 5
  9. Bukau, B., and G. C. Walker. 1989. Cellular defects caused by deletion of the Escherichia coli dnaK gene indicate roles for heat shock protein in normal metabolism. J. Bacteriol. 171:2337-2346.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. 6
  11. Cabeen, M. T., and C. Jacobs-Wagner. 2007. Skin and bones: the bacterial cytoskeleton, cell wall, and cell morphogenesis. J. Cell Biol. 179:381-387.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. 7
  13. Chapman, E., G. W. Farr, R. Usaite, K. Furtak, W. A. Fenton, T. K. Chaudhuri, E. R. Hondorp, R. G. Matthews, S. G. Wolf, J. R. Yates, M. Pypaert, and A. L. Horwich. 2006. Global aggregation of newly translated proteins in an Escherichia coli strain deficient of the chaperonin GroEL. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103:15800-15805.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. 8
  15. Den Blaauwen, T., N. Buddelmeijer, M. E. Aarsman, C. M. Hameete, and N. Nanninga. 1999. Timing of FtsZ assembly in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 181:5167-5175.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. 9
  17. Erickson, J. W., and C. A. Gross. 1989. Identification of the {sigma}E subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase: a second alternate {sigma} factor involved in high-temperature gene expression. Genes Dev. 3:1462-1471.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. 10
  19. Erickson, J. W., V. Vaughn, W. A. Walter, F. C. Neidhardt, and C. A. Gross. 1987. Regulation of the promoters and transcripts of rpoH, the Escherichia coli heat shock regulatory gene. Genes Dev. 1:419-432.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. 11
  21. Fujita, N., and A. Ishihama. 1987. Heat-shock induction of RNA polymerase {sigma}32 synthesis in Escherichia coli: transcriptional control and a multiple promoter system. Mol. Gen. Genet. 210:10-15.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. 12
  23. Fujiwara, K., and H. Taguchi. 2007. Filamentous morphology in GroE-depleted Escherichia coli induced by impaired folding of FtsE. J. Bacteriol. 189:5860-5866.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. 13
  25. Goehring, N. W., and J. Beckwith. 2005. Diverse paths to midcell: assembly of the bacterial cell division machinery. Curr. Biol. 15:R514-R526.[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. 14
  27. Goehring, N. W., F. Gueiros-Filho, and J. Beckwith. 2005. Premature targeting of a cell division protein to midcell allows dissection of divisome assembly in Escherichia coli. Genes Dev. 19:127-137.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. 15
  29. Guisbert, E., C. Herman, C. Z. Lu, and C. A. Gross. 2004. A chaperone network controls the heat shock response in E. coli. Genes Dev. 18:2812-2821.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. 16
  31. Hengge-Aronis, R. 2002. Signal transduction and regulatory mechanisms involved in control of the {sigma}S (RpoS) subunit of RNA polymerase. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 66:373-395.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. 17
  33. Herman, C., D. Thevenet, R. D'Ari, and P. Bouloc. 1995. Degradation of {sigma}32, the heat shock regulator in Escherichia coli, is governed by HflB. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:3516-3520.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. 18
  35. Holtzendorff, J., D. Hung, P. Brende, A. Reisenauer, P. H. Viollier, H. H. McAdams, and L. Shapiro. 2004. Oscillating global regulators control the genetic circuit driving a bacterial cell cycle. Science 304:983-987.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. 19
  37. Kang, P. J., and E. A. Craig. 1990. Identification and characterization of a new Escherichia coli gene that is a dosage-dependent suppressor of a dnaK deletion mutation. J. Bacteriol. 172:2055-2064.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. 20
  39. Klein, G., C. Dartigalongue, and S. Raina. 2003. Phosphorylation-mediated regulation of heat shock response in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 48:269-285.[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. 21
  41. Lange, R., and R. Hengge-Aronis. 1991. Identification of a central regulator of stationary-phase gene expression in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 5:49-59.[Medline]
  42. 22
  43. Lessl, M., D. Balzer, R. Lurz, V. L. Waters, D. G. Guiney, and E. Lanka. 1992. Dissection of IncP conjugative plasmid transfer: definition of the transfer region Tra2 by mobilization of the Tra1 region in trans. J. Bacteriol. 174:2493-2500.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. 23
  45. Livak, K. J., and T. D. Schmittgen. 2001. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2{Delta}{Delta}CT method. Methods 25:402-408.[CrossRef][Medline]
  46. 24
  47. Lutkenhaus, J. 1993. FtsZ ring in bacterial cytokinesis. Mol. Microbiol. 9:403-409.[CrossRef][Medline]
  48. 25
  49. McAdams, H. H., and L. Shapiro. 2003. A bacterial cell-cycle regulatory network operating in time and space. Science 301:1874-1877.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. 26
  51. Miller, J. H. 1972. Experiments in molecular genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
  52. 27
  53. Nonaka, G., M. Blankschien, C. Herman, C. A. Gross, and V. A. Rhodius. 2006. Regulon and promoter analysis of the E. coli heat-shock factor, {sigma}32, reveals a multifaceted cellular response to heat stress. Genes Dev. 20:1776-1789.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. 28
  55. Ogino, H., M. Wachi, A. Ishii, N. Iwai, T. Nishida, S. Yamada, K. Nagai, and M. Sugai. 2004. FtsZ-dependent localization of GroEL protein at possible division sites. Genes Cells 9:765-771.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. 29
  57. Rozen, S., and H. Skaletsky. 2000. Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. Methods Mol. Biol. 132:365-386.[Medline]
  58. 30
  59. Shih, Y. L., and L. Rothfield. 2006. The bacterial cytoskeleton. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 70:729-754.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  60. 31
  61. Straus, D. B., W. A. Walter, and C. A. Gross. 1987. The heat shock response of E. coli is regulated by changes in the concentration of {sigma}32. Nature 329:348-351.[CrossRef][Medline]
  62. 32
  63. Tétart, F., and J. P. Bouché. 1992. Regulation of the cell-cycle gene ftsZ by DicF antisense RNA. Division does not require a fixed number of FtsZ molecules. Mol. Microbiol. 6:615-620.[CrossRef][Medline]
  64. 33
  65. Tomoyasu, T., J. Gamer, B. Bukau, M. Kanemori, H. Mori, A. J. Rutman, A. B. Oppenheim, T. Yura, K. Yamanaka, H. Niki, et al. 1995. Escherichia coli FtsH is a membrane-bound, ATP-dependent protease which degrades the heat-shock transcription factor {sigma}32. EMBO J. 14:2551-2560.[Medline]
  66. 34
  67. Tomoyasu, T., T. Ogura, T. Tatsuta, and B. Bukau. 1998. Levels of DnaK and DnaJ provide tight control of heat shock gene expression and protein repair in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 30:567-581.[CrossRef][Medline]
  68. 35
  69. Tsuchido, T., R. A. VanBogelen, and F. C. Neidhardt. 1986. Heat shock response in Escherichia coli influences cell division. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83:6959-6963.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  70. 36
  71. Urech, C., S. Koby, A. B. Oppenheim, M. Munchbach, H. Hennecke, and F. Narberhaus. 2000. Differential degradation of Escherichia coli {sigma}32 and Bradyrhizobium japonicum RpoH factors by the FtsH protease. Eur. J. Biochem. 267:4831-4839.[Medline]
  72. 37
  73. Vicente, M., A. I. Rico, R. Martinez-Arteaga, and J. Mingorance. 2006. Septum enlightenment: assembly of bacterial division proteins. J. Bacteriol. 188:19-27.[Free Full Text]
  74. 38
  75. Weichart, D., R. Lange, N. Henneberg, and R. Hengge-Aronis. 1993. Identification and characterization of stationary phase-inducible genes in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 10:407-420.[CrossRef][Medline]
  76. 39
  77. Yura, T., E. Guisbert, M. Poritz, C. Z. Lu, E. Campbell, and C. A. Gross. 2007. Analysis of {sigma}32 mutants defective in chaperone-mediated feedback control reveals unexpected complexity of the heat shock response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104:17638-17643.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  78. 40
  79. Zahrl, D., M. Wagner, K. Bischof, and G. Koraimann. 2006. Expression and assembly of a functional type IV secretion system elicit extracytoplasmic and cytoplasmic stress responses in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 188:6611-6621.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  80. 41
  81. Zhao, K., M. Liu, and R. R. Burgess. 2005. The global transcriptional response of Escherichia coli to induced {sigma}32 protein involves {sigma}32 regulon activation followed by inactivation and degradation of {sigma}32 in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 280:17758-17768.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  82. 42
  83. Zhou, Y. N., N. Kusukawa, J. W. Erickson, C. A. Gross, and T. Yura. 1988. Isolation and characterization of Escherichia coli mutants that lack the heat shock sigma factor {sigma}32. J. Bacteriol. 170:3640-3649.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Journal of Bacteriology, March 2009, p. 1695-1702, Vol. 191, No. 5
0021-9193/09/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JB.01536-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wagner, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Koraimann, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wagner, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Koraimann, G.