Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, March 2009, p. 1979-1981, Vol. 191, No. 6
0021-9193/09/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JB.01549-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Laboratory of Food Microbiology and Leuven Food Science and Nutrition Research Center (LFoRCe), Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 22, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium
Received 31 October 2008/ Accepted 5 January 2009
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Interestingly, ivy and ydhA, two genes encoding specific lysozyme inhibitors, were found to reside under this Rcs regulon (8, 10). Ivy (inhibitor of vertebrate lysozyme, formerly known as YkfE) was discovered in 2001 as the first bacterial lysozyme inhibitor (1, 14), while the inhibitory activity of YdhA was only recently revealed by our research group (3). Although Ivy and YdhA are both able to inhibit c-type lysozymes, such as human lysozyme and hen egg white lysozyme (HEWL), they are structurally unrelated (1, 16). Interestingly, YdhA belongs to a group of proteins with a common conserved COG3895 domain that are widely spread among the Proteobacteria (3, 16). Unlike Ivy, which resides in the periplasm, YdhA is a lipoprotein and was therefore renamed MliC (membrane-bound lysozyme inhibitor of c-type lysozyme) (3).
Given the elementary observation that the two currently known lysozyme inhibitors of E. coli are both part of the Rcs regulon that can in turn be induced by antibiotic-mediated peptidoglycan stress, we wondered whether Rcs induction could also result from exposure to lysozyme itself. To test this, we introduced a tolA knockout from MG1655 tolA (3) into strain DH300 that is equipped with a genomic rprA-lacZ fusion able to report Rcs activation (12), in order to increase outer membrane permeability for HEWL (Table 1 lists all strains). A stationary-phase culture of the resulting strain, designated LC100, was diluted 1/100 in 4 ml fresh LB medium with different final concentrations of HEWL (0, 5, 10, 25, and 50 µg/ml), and after 2.5 h of further growth at 37°C, β-galactosidase activity was measured (13). Interestingly, rprA-lacZ was significantly induced at HEWL concentrations of >10 µg/ml, up to 4.4-fold at 50 µg/ml (Fig. 1A). This induction could be completely abolished upon the additional introduction of a knockout of rcsB (strain LC102), the response regulator required to activate gene expression in the Rcs pathway. Moreover, knocking out rcsF (strain LC101), the outer membrane lipoprotein sensor that triggers the Rcs pathway upon antibiotic-mediated peptidoglycan stress (10), also resulted in a loss of lysozyme induction. As a comparison, rprA-lacZ induction in DH300 treated with amdinocillin (Sigma-Aldrich, Bornem, Belgium), as previously described (10), resulted in a 16-fold increase in β-galactosidase activity (Fig. 1B). Please note that the difference in basal β-galactosidase levels between LC100 and DH300 (Fig. 1A and B) is probably due to the tolA mutation in LC100, which is known to result in a higher basal expression of the Rcs pathway (5). These data clearly demonstrate that the Rcs phosphorelay can indeed be activated by exposure to lysozyme and that this induction is mediated by the outer membrane sensor rcsF. This also implies that the Rcs pathway responds to different types of peptidoglycan stress, as β-lactam antibiotics block the formation of peptide side-chain cross-links by binding irreversibly to the transpeptidases, while lysozyme hydrolyzes the heteropolysaccharide backbone.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Bacterial strains and plasmids used in the study
|
![]() View larger version (9K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Induction of the Rcs pathway in LC100 (tolA::Kn Rcs+) with different HEWL concentrations (0 to 50 µg/ml) (A) and in DH300 (Rcs+) with (+) or without (–) amdinocillin treatment (B). Rcs induction is measured as β-galactosidase activity originating from a genomic rprA-lacZ reporter fusion and expressed in Miller units (13). Error bars indicate standard deviations of results from three replicate experiments. The corresponding RcsB– strain (LC102) and the RcsF– strain (LC101) showed rprA-lacZ inductions of <10 Miller units when subjected to lysozyme treatments and are therefore not shown.
|
![]() View larger version (22K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Growth curves (OD600) in the presence of 25 µg/ml HEWL of LC100 (tolA::Kn Rcs+) (squares), LC102 ( tolA RcsB–) (triangles), and LC101 (tolA::Kn RcsF–) (circles) harboring plasmid pAA410 driving arabinose-inducible expression of Ivy (A and C) or plasmid pAA530 driving arabinose inducible-expression of MliC (B and D). Stationary-phase cultures were diluted (1/100) in fresh medium with HEWL in either the absence (open symbols) or presence (filled symbols) of 0.02% arabinose, and growth was measured as increase in OD600 (Multiscan RC; Thermo Scientific, Zellik, Belgium) at 37°C for 6 h. Error bars indicate standard deviations of results from three replicate experiments.
|
Interestingly, the growth of LC102(pAA410) and LC101(pAA410) was largely rescued upon arabinose induction of Ivy expression (Fig. 2A and C). For LC102(pAA530) and LC101(pAA530), only a partial restoration of growth could be achieved by arabinose-induced MliC expression (Fig. 2B and D). Control experiments showed that the growth of neither strain was affected by the addition of arabinose in the absence of lysozyme. Furthermore, with a plasmid identical to pAA410 and pAA530 but with the gfp gene, encoding green fluorescent protein, replacing Ivy or MliC (pAA100) (Table 1), the growth of LC100, LC101, and LC102 was only marginally affected by arabinose addition (data not shown). Thus, our results show that the lysozyme sensitivity caused by impairing the induction of the Rcs pathway can be overcome specifically by enhanced expression of lysozyme inhibitors, in particular, Ivy.
In conclusion, we demonstrated that the Rcs phosphorelay system responds to exogenous lysozyme challenge and confers enhanced lysozyme resistance in E. coli via induction of lysozyme inhibitors. These findings extend the role of the Rcs phosphorelay as a peptidoglycan stress response pathway in several Enterobacteriaceae. With the exception of the plant pathogen Erwinia carotovora, a functional Rcs pathway seems to be present only in Enterobacteriaceae species that colonize the gut of an animal host either as pathogens or as commensals (7, 9). Furthermore, Rcs mutants of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium showed attenuated systemic infection of mice, and at least one Rcs-activated gene was implicated in this phenotype (7). For these reasons, the Rcs pathway has been suggested to be a specific host interaction pathway. The demonstration in the current work that the Rcs pathway is inducible by lysozyme and triggers lysozyme tolerance by induction of lysozyme inhibitors lends further support to this hypothesis.
Published ahead of print on 9 January 2009. ![]()
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»