This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sedgwick, S G Articles by Woodgate, R Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sedgwick, S G Articles by Woodgate, R

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Bacteriol. 1991 September; 173(18): 5604-5611

research-article

Mutagenic DNA repair in enterobacteria.

S G Sedgwick, C Ho and R Woodgate

Genetics Division, National Institute for Medical Research, London, Great Britain.

ABSTRACT

Sixteen species of enterobacteria have been screened for mutagenic DNA repair activity. In Escherichia coli, mutagenic DNA repair is encoded by the umuDC operon. Synthesis of UmuD and UmuC proteins is induced as part of the SOS response to DNA damage, and after induction, the UmuD protein undergoes an autocatalytic cleavage to produce the carboxy-terminal UmuD' fragment needed for induced mutagenesis. The presence of a similar system in other species was examined by using a combined approach of inducible-mutagenesis assays, cross-reactivity to E. coli UmuD and UmuD' antibodies to test for induction and cleavage of UmuD-like proteins, and hybridization with E. coli and Salmonella typhimurium umu DNA probes to map umu-like genes. The results indicate a more widespread distribution of mutagenic DNA repair in other species than was previously thought. They also show that umu loci can be more complex in other species than in E. coli. Differences in UV-induced mutability of more than 200-fold were seen between different species of enteric bacteria and even between multiple natural isolates of E. coli, and yet some of the species which display a poorly mutable phenotype still have umu-like genes and proteins. It is suggested that umDC genes can be curtailed in their mutagenic activities but that they may still participate in some other, unknown process which provides the continued stimulus for their retention.

---

J Bacteriol. 1991 September; 173(18): 5604-5611

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Murli, S., Opperman, T., Smith, B. T., Walker, G. C. (2000). A Role for the umuDC Gene Products of Escherichia coli in Increasing Resistance to DNA Damage in Stationary Phase by Inhibiting the Transition to Exponential Growth. J. Bacteriol. 182: 1127-1135 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kuzminov, A. (1999). Recombinational Repair of DNA Damage in Escherichia coli and Bacteriophage lambda. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 63: 751-813 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• McLenigan, M. P., Kulaeva, O. I., Ennis, D. G., Levine, A. S., Woodgate, R. (1999). The Bacteriophage P1 HumD Protein Is a Functional Homolog of the Prokaryotic UmuD'-Like Proteins and Facilitates SOS Mutagenesis in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 181: 7005-7013 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Opperman, T., Murli, S., Smith, B. T., Walker, G. C. (1999). A model for a umuDC-dependent prokaryotic DNA damage checkpoint. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 9218-9223 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Runyen-Janecky, L. J., Hong, M., Payne, S. M. (1999). The Virulence Plasmid-Encoded impCAB Operon Enhances Survival and Induced Mutagenesis in Shigella flexneri after Exposure to UV Radiation. Infect. Immun. 67: 1415-1423 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Smith, B. T., Walker, G. C. (1998). Mutagenesis and More: umuDC and the Escherichia coli SOS Response. Genetics 148: 1599-1610 [Abstract] [Full Text]