This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Donnelly, C E
Right arrow Articles by Walker, G C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Donnelly, C E
Right arrow Articles by Walker, G C

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Bacteriol. 1992 May; 174(10): 3133-3139

research-article

Coexpression of UmuD' with UmuC suppresses the UV mutagenesis deficiency of groE mutants.

C E Donnelly and G C Walker

Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge 02139.

ABSTRACT

The GroE proteins of Escherichia coli are heat shock proteins which have also been shown to be molecular chaperone proteins. Our previous work has shown that the GroE proteins of E. coli are required for UV mutagenesis. This process requires the umuDC genes which are regulated by the SOS regulon. As part of the UV mutagenesis pathway, the product of the umuD gene, UmuD, is posttranslationally cleaved to yield the active form, UmuD'. In order to investigate what role the groE gene products play in UV mutagenesis, we measured UV mutagenesis in groE+ and groE strains which were expressing either the umuDC or umuD'C genes. We found that expression of umuD' instead of umuD will suppress the nonmutability conferred by the groE mutations. However, cleavage of UmuD to UmuD' is unaffected by mutations at the groE locus. Instead we found that the presence of UmuD' increased the stability of UmuC in groE strains. In addition, we obtained evidence which indicates that GroEL interacts directly with UmuC.


J Bacteriol. 1992 May; 174(10): 3133-3139




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Cohen, S. E., Godoy, V. G., Walker, G. C. (2009). Transcriptional Modulator NusA Interacts with Translesion DNA Polymerases in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 191: 665-672 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Layton, J. C., Foster, P. L. (2005). Error-Prone DNA Polymerase IV Is Regulated by the Heat Shock Chaperone GroE in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 187: 449-457 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Opperman, T., Murli, S., Smith, B. T., Walker, G. C. (1999). A model for a umuDC-dependent prokaryotic DNA damage checkpoint. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 9218-9223 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Berlyn, M. K. B. (1998). Linkage Map of Escherichia coli K-12, Edition 10: The Traditional Map. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62: 814-984 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • McLenigan, M., Peat, T. S., Frank, E. G., McDonald, J. P., Gonzalez, M., Levine, A. S., Hendrickson, W. A., Woodgate, R. (1998). Novel Escherichia coli umuD' Mutants: Structure-Function Insights into SOS Mutagenesis. J. Bacteriol. 180: 4658-4666 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Smith, B. T., Walker, G. C. (1998). Mutagenesis and More: umuDC and the Escherichia coli SOS Response. Genetics 148: 1599-1610 [Abstract] [Full Text]