JB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Das Gupta, S K
Right arrow Articles by Tyagi, A K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Das Gupta, S K
Right arrow Articles by Tyagi, A K

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Bacteriol. 1993 August; 175(16): 5186-5192

research-article

Cloning and assessment of mycobacterial promoters by using a plasmid shuttle vector.

S K Das Gupta, M D Bashyam and A K Tyagi

Department of Biochemistry, University of Delhi South Campus, India.

ABSTRACT

We have constructed a promoter selection vector for mycobacteria to analyze the sequences involved in mycobacterial transcriptional regulation. The vector pSD7 contains extrachromosomal origins of replication from Escherichia coli as well as from Mycobacterium fortuitum and a kanamycin resistance gene for positive selection in mycobacteria. The promoterless chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) reporter gene has been used to detect mycobacterial promoter elements in a homologous environment and to quantify their relative strengths. Using pSD7, we have isolated 125 promoter clones from the slowly growing pathogen Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv and 350 clones from the fast-growing saprophyte Mycobacterium smegmatis. The promoters exhibited a wide range of strengths, as indicated by their corresponding CAT reporter activities (5 to 2,500 nmol/min/mg of protein). However, while most of the M. smegmatis promoters supported relatively higher CAT activities ranging from 100 to 2,500 nmol/min/mg of protein, a majority of those from M. tuberculosis supported CAT activities ranging from 5 to only about 100 nmol/min/mg of protein. Our results indicate that stronger promoters occur less frequently in the case of M. tuberculosis compared with M. smegmatis. To assess the extent of divergence of mycobacterial promoters vis-à-vis those of E. coli, the CAT activities supported by the promoters in E. coli were measured and compared with their corresponding activities in mycobacteria. Most of the mycobacterial promoter elements functioned poorly in E. coli. The homologous selection system that we have developed has thus enabled the identification of mycobacterial promoters that apparently function optimally only in a native environment.

J Bacteriol. 1993 August; 175(16): 5186-5192




This article has been cited by other articles:



Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1993 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.