This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Doty, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Nester, E. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Doty, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Nester, E. W.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J. Bacteriol., Feb 1996, 961-970, Vol 178, No. 4
Copyright © 1996, American Society for Microbiology

Mutational analysis of the input domain of the VirA protein of Agrobacterium tumefaciens

SL Doty, MC Yu, JI Lundin, JD Heath and EW Nester
Department of Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle 98195, USA.

The transmembrane sensor protein VirA activates VirG in response to high levels of acetosyringone (AS). In order to respond to low levels of AS, VirA requires the periplasmic sugar-binding protein ChvE and monosaccharides released from plant wound sites. To better understand how VirA senses these inducers, the C58 virA gene was randomly mutagenized, and 14 mutants defective in vir gene induction and containing mutations which mapped to the input domain of VirA were isolated. Six mutants had single missense mutatiions in three widely separated areas of the periplasmic domain. Eight mutants had mutations in or near an amphipathic helix, TM1, or TM2. Four of the mutations in the periplasmic domain, when introduced into the corresponding A6 virA sequence, caused a specific defect in the vir gene response to glucose. This suggests that most of the periplasmic domain is required for the interaction with, or response to, ChvE. Three of the mutations from outside the periplasmic domain, one from each transmembrane domain and one from the amphiphathic helix, were made in A6 virA. These mutants were defective in the vir gene response to AS. These mutations did not affect the stability or topology of VirA or prevent dimerization; therefore, they may interfere with detection of AS or transmission of the signals to the kinase domain. Characterization of C58 chvE mutants revealed that, unlike A6 VirA, C58 VirA requires ChvE for activation of the vir genes.


This article has been cited by other articles:

  • He, F., Nair, G. R., Soto, C. S., Chang, Y., Hsu, L., Ronzone, E., DeGrado, W. F., Binns, A. N. (2009). Molecular Basis of ChvE Function in Sugar Binding, Sugar Utilization, and Virulence in Agrobacterium tumefaciens. J. Bacteriol. 191: 5802-5813 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Depardieu, F., Foucault, M.-L., Bell, J., Dubouix, A., Guibert, M., Lavigne, J.-P., Levast, M., Courvalin, P. (2009). New Combinations of Mutations in VanD-Type Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium, Enterococcus faecalis, and Enterococcus avium Strains. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53: 1952-1963 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Mascher, T., Helmann, J. D., Unden, G. (2006). Stimulus Perception in Bacterial Signal-Transducing Histidine Kinases. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 70: 910-938 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Liu, P., Wood, D., Nester, E. W. (2005). Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxykinase Is an Acid-Induced, Chromosomally Encoded Virulence Factor in Agrobacterium tumefaciens. J. Bacteriol. 187: 6039-6045 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Suksomtip, M., Liu, P., Anderson, T., Tungpradabkul, S., Wood, D. W., Nester, E. W. (2005). Citrate Synthase Mutants of Agrobacterium Are Attenuated in Virulence and Display Reduced vir Gene Induction. J. Bacteriol. 187: 4844-4852 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Brencic, A., Winans, S. C. (2005). Detection of and Response to Signals Involved in Host-Microbe Interactions by Plant-Associated Bacteria. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 69: 155-194 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Nair, G. R., Liu, Z., Binns, A. N. (2003). Reexamining the Role of the Accessory Plasmid pAtC58 in the Virulence of Agrobacterium tumefaciens Strain C58. Plant Physiol. 133: 989-999 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Gelvin, S. B. (2003). Agrobacterium-Mediated Plant Transformation: the Biology behind the "Gene-Jockeying" Tool. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 67: 16-37 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Peng, W.-T., Banta, L. M., Charles, T. C., Nester, E. W. (2001). The chvH Locus of Agrobacterium Encodes a Homologue of an Elongation Factor Involved in Protein Synthesis. J. Bacteriol. 183: 36-45 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kwon, O., Georgellis, D., Lynch, A. S., Boyd, D., Lin, E. C. C. (2000). The ArcB Sensor Kinase of Escherichia coli: Genetic Exploration of the Transmembrane Region. J. Bacteriol. 182: 2960-2966 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Peng, W.-T., Lee, Y.-W., Nester, E. W. (1998). The Phenolic Recognition Profiles of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens VirA Protein Are Broadened by a High Level of the Sugar Binding Protein ChvE. J. Bacteriol. 180: 5632-5638 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kalogeraki, V. S., Winans, S. C. (1998). Wound-Released Chemical Signals May Elicit Multiple Responses from an Agrobacterium tumefaciens Strain Containing an Octopine-Type Ti Plasmid. J. Bacteriol. 180: 5660-5667 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Walker, H.-P. C. a. G. C. (1998). Succinoglycan Production by Rhizobium meliloti Is Regulated through the ExoS-ChvI Two-Component Regulatory System. J. Bacteriol. 180: 20-26 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Waldburger, C. D., Sauer, R. T. (1996). Signal Detection by the PhoQ Sensor-Transmitter. CHARACTERIZATION OF THE SENSOR DOMAIN AND A RESPONSE-IMPAIRED MUTANT THAT IDENTIFIES LIGAND-BINDING DETERMINANTS. J. Biol. Chem. 271: 26630-26636 [Abstract] [Full Text]