This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ehlert, K.
Right arrow Articles by Labischinski, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ehlert, K.
Right arrow Articles by Labischinski, H.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J. Bacteriol., Dec 1997, 7573-7576, Vol 179, No. 23
Copyright © 1997, American Society for Microbiology

Specificities of FemA and FemB for different glycine residues: FemB cannot substitute for FemA in staphylococcal peptidoglycan pentaglycine side chain formation

K Ehlert, W Schroder and H Labischinski
PH-Research Antiinfectives I, Bayer AG, Wuppertal, Germany.

The femAB operon codes for two nearly identical approximately 50-kDa proteins involved in the formation of the staphylococcal pentaglycine interpeptide bridge. Sequencing and analysis of the femA region of mutants isolated by chemical mutagenesis and selection for lysostaphin resistance revealed point mutations leading to the expression of truncated FemA proteins. These femA mutants, although still producing an intact FemB, exhibited a phenotype identical as that described for femAB double mutants. Thus, FemA seems to be essential for the addition of glycine residues 2 and 3 only, whereas FemB is involved in the attachment of exclusively glycine residues 4 and 5. Although FemB has 39% identity with FemA, it cannot substitute for FemA. The FemA and FemB proteins seem to be highly specific in regard to the position of the glycine residues that they attach.


This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Kusuma, C., Jadanova, A., Chanturiya, T., Kokai-Kun, J. F. (2007). Lysostaphin-Resistant Variants of Staphylococcus aureus Demonstrate Reduced Fitness In Vitro and In Vivo. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51: 475-482 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Grundling, A., Missiakas, D. M., Schneewind, O. (2006). Staphylococcus aureus Mutants with Increased Lysostaphin Resistance.. J. Bacteriol. 188: 6286-6297 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Grundling, A., Schneewind, O. (2006). Cross-Linked Peptidoglycan Mediates Lysostaphin Binding to the Cell Wall Envelope of Staphylococcus aureus.. J. Bacteriol. 188: 2463-2472 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Lee, S. G., Fischetti, V. A. (2006). Purification and Characterization of LPXTGase from Staphylococcus aureus: the Amino Acid Composition Mirrors That Found in the Peptidoglycan. J. Bacteriol. 188: 389-398 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Lu, J. Z., Fujiwara, T., Komatsuzawa, H., Sugai, M., Sakon, J. (2006). Cell Wall-targeting Domain of Glycylglycine Endopeptidase Distinguishes among Peptidoglycan Cross-bridges. J. Biol. Chem. 281: 549-558 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kusuma, C. M., Kokai-Kun, J. F. (2005). Comparison of Four Methods for Determining Lysostaphin Susceptibility of Various Strains of Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49: 3256-3263 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Hong, H.-J., Hutchings, M. I., Hill, L. M., Buttner, M. J. (2005). The Role of the Novel Fem Protein VanK in Vancomycin Resistance in Streptomyces coelicolor. J. Biol. Chem. 280: 13055-13061 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kokai-Kun, J. F., Walsh, S. M., Chanturiya, T., Mond, J. J. (2003). Lysostaphin Cream Eradicates Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Colonization in a Cotton Rat Model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 1589-1597 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Rohrer, S., Berger-Bachi, B. (2003). FemABX Peptidyl Transferases: a Link between Branched-Chain Cell Wall Peptide Formation and {beta}-Lactam Resistance in Gram-Positive Cocci. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 837-846 [Full Text]  
  • Kiri, N., Archer, G., Climo, M. W. (2002). Combinations of Lysostaphin with {beta}-Lactams Are Synergistic against Oxacillin-Resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46: 2017-2020 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Climo, M. W., Ehlert, K., Archer, G. L. (2001). Mechanism and Suppression of Lysostaphin Resistance in Oxacillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45: 1431-1437 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Ehlert, K., Tschierske, M., Mori, C., Schröder, W., Berger-Bächi, B. (2000). Site-Specific Serine Incorporation by Lif and Epr into Positions 3 and 5 of the Staphylococcal Peptidoglycan Interpeptide Bridge. J. Bacteriol. 182: 2635-2638 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Lammers, A., Kruijt, E., van de Kuijt, C., Nuijten, P. J. M., Smith, H. E. (2000). Identification of Staphylococcus aureus genes expressed during growth in milk: a useful model for selection of genes important in bovine mastitis?. Microbiology 146: 981-987 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Rohrer, S., Ehlert, K., Tschierske, M., Labischinski, H., Berger-Bachi, B. (1999). The essential Staphylococcus aureus gene fmhB is involved in the first step of peptidoglycan pentaglycine interpeptide formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 9351-9356 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Ton-That, H., Labischinski, H., Berger-Bachi, B., Schneewind, O. (1998). Anchor Structure of Staphylococcal Surface Proteins. III. ROLE OF THE FemA, FemB, AND FemX FACTORS IN ANCHORING SURFACE PROTEINS TO THE BACTERIAL CELL WALL. J. Biol. Chem. 273: 29143-29149 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Ling, B., Berger-Bächi, B. (1998). Increased Overall Antibiotic Susceptibility in Staphylococcus aureus femAB Null Mutants. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42: 936-938 [Abstract] [Full Text]