This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Camacho, A.
Right arrow Articles by Salas, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Camacho, A.
Right arrow Articles by Salas, M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Bacteriology, December 2000, p. 6927-6932, Vol. 182, No. 24
0021-9193/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Pleiotropic Effect of Protein P6 on the Viral Cycle of Bacteriophage phi 29

Ana Camacho and Margarita Salas*

Centro de Biología Molecular "Severo Ochoa" (CSIC-UAM), Universidad Autónoma, Canto Blanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain

Received 17 July 2000/Accepted 4 October 2000

The product of bacteriophage phi 29 early gene 6, protein p6, is a double-stranded-DNA binding protein and one of the more abundant proteins during viral infection. We have studied the role of protein p6 in vivo through the infection of suppressor and nonsuppressor Bacillus subtilis strains with a phage carrying a nonsense mutation in gene 6, sus6(626). In the absence of functional protein p6, the two major processes of the viral cycle, transcription and DNA replication, were affected. Viral DNA synthesis was practically abolished, and early transcription was remarkably delayed and, in addition, underregulated at late times of the infection. The amount of protein p6 synthesized after infection with mutant phage sus6(626) under suppressor conditions was sixfold lower than that produced after wild-type infection. Nonetheless, phage production was as high as that obtained after wild-type infection. These results indicate that p6 is synthesized in amounts higher than those needed for most of its functions. However, the concentration of protein p6 appeared to be important for repression of the early promoter C2.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Centro de Biología Molecular "Severo Ochoa" (CSIC-UAM), Universidad Autónoma, Canto Blanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain. Phone: 34-91 397 8435. Fax: 34-91 397 84 90. E-mail: msalas{at}cbm.uam.es.


Journal of Bacteriology, December 2000, p. 6927-6932, Vol. 182, No. 24
0021-9193/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Meijer, W. J. J., Horcajadas, J. A., Salas, M. (2001). {phi}29 Family of Phages. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 65: 261-287 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Camacho, A., Salas, M. (2001). Repression of Bacteriophage phi 29 Early Promoter C2 by Viral Protein p6 Is Due to Impairment of Closed Complex. J. Biol. Chem. 276: 28927-28932 [Abstract] [Full Text]