This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Adler, E.
Right arrow Articles by Stragier, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Adler, E.
Right arrow Articles by Stragier, P.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Bacteriology, June 2001, p. 3574-3581, Vol. 183, No. 12
0021-9193/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/JB.183.12.3574-3581.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Bacillus subtilis Locus Encoding a Killer Protein and Its Antidote

Elliot Adler,1,dagger Imrich Barák,2 and Patrick Stragier1,*

Institut de Biologie Physico-Chimique, Paris, France,1 and Institute of Molecular Biology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovak Republic2

Received 22 January 2001/Accepted 30 March 2001

We have isolated mutations that block sporulation after formation of the polar septum in Bacillus subtilis. These mutations were mapped to the two genes of a new locus, spoIIS. Inactivation of the second gene, spoIISB, decreases sporulation efficiency by 4 orders of magnitude. Inactivation of the first gene, spoIISA, has no effect on sporulation but it fully restores sporulation of a spoIISB null mutant, indicating that SpoIISB is required only to counteract the negative effect of SpoIISA on sporulation. An internal promoter ensures the synthesis of an excess of SpoIISB over SpoIISA during exponential growth and sporulation. In the absence of SpoIISB, the sporulating cells show lethal damage of their envelope shortly after asymmetric septation, a defect that can be corrected by synthesizing SpoIISB only in the mother cell. However, forced synthesis of SpoIISA in exponentially growing cells or in the forespore leads to the same type of morphological damage and to cell death. In both cases protection against the killing effect of SpoIISA can be provided by simultaneous synthesis of SpoIISB. The spoIIS locus is unique to B. subtilis, and since it is completely dispensable for sporulation its physiological role remains elusive.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institut de Biologie Physico-Chimique, 13 rue Pierre et Marie Curie, 75005 Paris, France. Phone: 33-1-58415121. Fax: 33-1-58415020. E-mail: stragier{at}ibpc.fr.

dagger Present address: Senomyx, Inc., La Jolla, CA 92037.


Journal of Bacteriology, June 2001, p. 3574-3581, Vol. 183, No. 12
0021-9193/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/JB.183.12.3574-3581.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Merkel, T. J., Boucher, P. E., Stibitz, S., Grippe, V. K. (2003). Analysis of bvgR Expression in Bordetella pertussis. J. Bacteriol. 185: 6902-6912 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Abanes-De Mello, A., Sun, Y.-L., Aung, S., Pogliano, K. (2002). A cytoskeleton-like role for the bacterial cell wall during engulfment of the Bacillus subtilis forespore. Genes Dev. 16: 3253-3264 [Abstract] [Full Text]