Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, December 2001, p. 6752-6762, Vol. 183, No. 23
Department of Plant & Microbial Biology,
University of California, Berkeley, California 94720
Received 3 April 2001/Accepted 11 September 2001
We have formulated a numerical model that simulates the
accumulation of green fluorescent protein (GFP) in bacterial cells from
a generic promoter-gfp fusion. The model takes into account the activity of the promoter, the time it takes GFP to mature into its
fluorescent form, the susceptibility of GFP to proteolytic degradation,
and the growth rate of the bacteria. From the model, we derived a
simple formula with which promoter activity can be inferred easily and
quantitatively from actual measurements of GFP fluorescence in growing
bacterial cultures. To test the usefulness of the formula, we
determined the activity of the LacI-repressible promoter
PA1/O4/O3 in response to increasing
concentrations of the inducer IPTG
(isopropyl-
0021-9193/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JB.183.23.6752-6762.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Predictive and Interpretive Simulation of Green
Fluorescent Protein Expression in Reporter Bacteria
-D-thiogalactopyranoside) and were able to predict cooperativity between the LacI repressors on each
of the two operator sites within PA1/O4/O3.
Aided by the model, we also quantified the proteolytic degradation of GFP[AAV], GFP[ASV], and GFP[LVA], which are popular variants of GFP with reduced stability in bacteria. Best described by
Michaelis-Menten kinetics, the rate at which these variants were
degraded was a function of the activity of the promoter that drives
their synthesis: a weak promoter yielded proportionally less GFP
fluorescence than a strong one. The degree of disproportionality is
species dependent: the effect was more pronounced in Erwinia
herbicola than in Escherichia coli. This phenomenon
has important implications for the interpretation of fluorescence from
bacterial reporters based on these GFP variants. The model furthermore
predicted a significant effect of growth rate on the GFP content of
individual bacteria, which if not accounted for might lead to
misinterpretation of GFP data. In practice, our model will be helpful
for prior testing of different combinations of promoter-gfp
fusions that best fit the application of a particular bacterial
reporter strain, and also for the interpretation of actual GFP
fluorescence data that are obtained with that reporter.
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: University of
California, Department of Plant & Microbial Biology, 111 Koshland Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720. Phone: (510) 643 6498. Fax: (510) 642 4995. E-mail:
leveau{at}uclink4.berkeley.edu.
This article has been cited by other articles:
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»