| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Bacteriology, August 2007, p. 5608-5616, Vol. 189, No. 15
0021-9193/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JB.00619-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Carles Úbeda,1,3,
María Ángeles Tormo,1,2
María Desamparados Ferrer,1,2
Íñigo Lasa,4
Richard P. Novick,3 and
José R. Penadés1,2*
Centro de Investigación y Tecnología Animal, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias (CITA-IVIA), Apdo. 187, 12.400 Segorbe, Castellón, Spain,1 Departamento de Química, Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, CEU-Universidad Cardenal Herrera, 46113 Moncada, Valencia, Spain,2 Skirball Institute, New York University Medical Center, 540 First Avenue, New York, New York 10016,3 Instituto de Agrobiotecnología y Recursos Naturales, CSIC-Universidad Pública de Navarra, 31006 Pamplona, Navarra, Spain4
Received 21 April 2007/ Accepted 21 May 2007
SaPIbov2 is a member of the SaPI family of staphylococcal pathogenicity islands and is very closely related to SaPIbov1. Typically, certain temperate phages can induce excision and replication of one or more of these islands and can package them into special small phage-like particles commensurate with their genome sizes (referred to as the excision-replication-packaging [ERP] cycle). We have studied the phage-SaPI interaction in some depth using SaPIbov2, with special reference to the role of its integrase. We demonstrate here that SaPIbov2 can be induced to replicate by different staphylococcal phages. After replication, SaPIbov2 is efficiently encapsidated and transferred to recipient organisms, including different non-Staphylococcus aureus staphylococci, where it integrates at a SaPI-specific attachment site, attC, by means of a self-coded integrase (Int). Phages that cannot induce the SaPIbov2 ERP cycle can transfer the island by recA-dependent classical generalized transduction and can also transfer it by a novel mechanism that requires the expression of SaPIbov2 int in the recipient but not in the donor. It is suggested that this mechanism involves the encapsidation of standard transducing fragments containing the intact island followed by int-mediated excision, circularization, and integration in the recipient.
Published ahead of print on 1 June 2007.
E.M. and C.U. contributed equally to this work.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| Appl. Environ. Microbiol. | Infect. Immun. | Eukaryot. Cell |
|---|---|---|
| Mol. Cell. Biol. | J. Virol. | Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. |
| ALL ASM JOURNALS |