This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ruer, S.
Right arrow Articles by de Bentzmann, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ruer, S.
Right arrow Articles by de Bentzmann, S.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Bacteriology, May 2007, p. 3547-3555, Vol. 189, No. 9
0021-9193/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JB.00093-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Assembly of Fimbrial Structures in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Functionality and Specificity of Chaperone-Usher Machineries{triangledown}

Ségolène Ruer, Silke Stender, Alain Filloux,* and Sophie de Bentzmann

Laboratoire d'Ingénierie des Systèmes Macromoléculaires, CNRS-IBSM-UPR9027, 31 Chemin Joseph Aiguier, 13402 Marseille Cedex 20, France

Received 17 January 2007/ Accepted 1 February 2007

Fimbrial or nonfimbrial adhesins assembled by the bacterial chaperone-usher pathway have been demonstrated to play a key role in pathogenesis. Such an assembly mechanism has been exemplified in uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains with the Pap and the Fim systems. In Pseudomonas aeruginosa, three gene clusters (cupA, cupB, and cupC) encoding chaperone-usher pathway components have been identified in the genome sequence of the PAO1 strain. The Cup systems differ from the Pap or Fim systems, since they obviously lack numbers of genes encoding fimbrial subunits. Nevertheless, the CupA system has been demonstrated to be involved in biofilm formation on solid surfaces, whereas the role of the CupB and CupC systems in biofilm formation could not be clearly elucidated. Moreover, these gene clusters were described as poorly expressed under standard laboratory conditions. The cupB and cupC clusters are directly under the control of a two-component regulatory system designated RocA1/S1/R. In this study, we revealed that Roc1-dependent induction of the cupB and cupC genes resulted in a high level of biofilm formation, with CupB and CupC acting with synergy in clustering bacteria for microcolony formation. Very importantly, this phenotype was associated with the assembly of cell surface fimbriae visualized by electron microscopy. Finally, we observed that the CupB and CupC systems are specialized in the assembly of their own fimbrial subunits and are not exchangeable.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Laboratoire d'Ingénierie des Systèmes Macromoléculaires, CNRS-IBSM-UPR9027, 31 Chemin Joseph Aiguier, 13402 Marseille Cedex 20, France. Phone: 33 49 1164127. Fax: 33 49 1712124. E-mail: filloux{at}ibsm.cnrs-mrs.fr

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 9 February 2007.


Journal of Bacteriology, May 2007, p. 3547-3555, Vol. 189, No. 9
0021-9193/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JB.00093-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Bernard, C. S., Bordi, C., Termine, E., Filloux, A., de Bentzmann, S. (2009). Organization and PprB-Dependent Control of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa tad Locus, Involved in Flp Pilus Biology. J. Bacteriol. 191: 1961-1973 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Rao, F., Yang, Y., Qi, Y., Liang, Z.-X. (2008). Catalytic Mechanism of Cyclic Di-GMP-Specific Phosphodiesterase: a Study of the EAL Domain-Containing RocR from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 190: 3622-3631 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Nuccio, S.-P., Baumler, A. J. (2007). Evolution of the Chaperone/Usher Assembly Pathway: Fimbrial Classification Goes Greek. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 71: 551-575 [Abstract] [Full Text]