JB Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
JB Accepts, published online ahead of print on 25 January 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
JB.01353-07v1
190/7/2323    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nanchen, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sauer, U.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nanchen, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sauer, U.
J. Bacteriol. doi:10.1128/JB.01353-07
Copyright (c) 2008, American Society for Microbiology and/or the Listed Authors/Institutions. All Rights Reserved.

cAMP-Dependent Catabolite Repression is the Dominant Control Mechanism of Metabolic Fluxes under Glucose Limitation in Escherichia coli

Annik Nanchen, Alexander Schicker, Olga Revelles, and Uwe Sauer*

Institute of Molecular Systems Biology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: sauer{at}imsb.biol.ethz.ch.


   Abstract

Although a whole arsenal of mechanisms are potentially involved in metabolic regulation, it is largely uncertain when, under which conditions, and to which extent a particular mechanism actually controls network fluxes and thus cellular physiology. Based on 13C-flux analysis in Escherichia coli mutants, we elucidated the relevance of global transcriptional regulation by ArcA, ArcB, Cra, CreB, CreC, Crp, Cya, Fnr, Hns, Mlc, OmpR and UspA on aerobic glucose catabolism in glucose-limited chemostat cultures at a growth rate of 0.1h-1. The by far most relevant control mechanism was cAMP-dependent catabolite repression as the inducer of the PEP-glyoxylate cycle and thus low tricarboxylic acid cycle fluxes. While all other mutants and the reference E. coli exhibited high glyoxylate shunt and PEP carboxykinase fluxes, and thus high PEP-glyoxylate cycle flux, this cycle was essentially abolished in both the Crp and Cya mutants that lack the cAMP-CRP complex. Most other mutations were phenotypically silent and only the Cra and Hns mutants exhibited slightly altered flux distributions through PEP carboxykinase and tricarboxylic acid cycle, respectively. The Cra effect on PEP carboxykinase was probably the consequence of a specific control mechanism, while the Hns effect appears to be unspecific. For central metabolism, the available data thus suggest that a single transcriptional regulation process exerts the dominant control under a given condition and this control is highly specific for a single pathway or cycle within the network.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.