JB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
JB Accepts, published online ahead of print on 17 November 2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
JB.01381-06v1
189/2/591    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thomaides, H. B.
Right arrow Articles by Czaplewski, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thomaides, H. B.
Right arrow Articles by Czaplewski, L.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J. Bacteriol. doi:10.1128/JB.01381-06
Copyright (c) 2006, American Society for Microbiology and/or the Listed Authors/Institutions. All Rights Reserved.

Essential Bacterial Functions Encoded by Gene Pairs

Helena B. Thomaides*, Ella J. Davison, Lisa Burston, Hazel Johnson, David R. Brown, Alison C. Hunt, Jeffery Errington, and Lloyd Czaplewski

Prolysis Ltd., Oxford University Begbroke Science Park, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom; and Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: helena.thomaides{at}prolysis.com,


   Abstract

To address the need for new antibacterials a number of bacterial genomes have been systematically disrupted to identify essential genes. Such programmes have focused on the disruption of single genes and may have missed functions encoded by gene pairs or multiple genes. In this work, we hypothesised that we could predict the identity of pairs of proteins within one organism that have the same function. We identified 135 putative protein pairs in Bacillus subtilis and attempted to disrupt the genes forming these, singly and then in pairs. The single gene disruptions revealed new genes that could not be disrupted individually and other genes required for growth in minimal medium or for sporulation. The pair-wise disruptions revealed seven pairs of proteins that are likely to have the same function, as the presence of one protein can compensate for the absence of the other. Six of these pairs are essential for bacterial viability and in four cases show a pattern of species conservation appropriate for potential antibacterial development. This work highlights the importance of combinatorial studies in understanding gene duplication and identifying functional redundancy.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2006 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.