JB
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
JB Accepts, published online ahead of print on 8 December 2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
JB.01542-06v1
189/5/1884    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bittner, A. N.
Right arrow Articles by Oke, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bittner, A. N.
Right arrow Articles by Oke, V.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J. Bacteriol. doi:10.1128/JB.01542-06
Copyright (c) 2006, American Society for Microbiology and/or the Listed Authors/Institutions. All Rights Reserved.

Only one of five groEL genes is required for viability and successful symbiosis in Sinorhizobium meliloti

Alycia N. Bittner, Amanda Foltz, and Valerie Oke*

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: voke{at}pitt.edu.


   Abstract

Many bacterial species contain multiple copies of the genes that encode the chaperone GroEL and its co-chaperone GroES, including all of the fully sequenced root nodulating bacteria that interact symbiotically with legumes to generate fixed nitrogen. In particular, in Sinorhizobium meliloti there are four groESL operons and one groEL gene. To uncover functional redundancies of these genes during growth and symbiosis, we attempted to construct strains containing all combinations of groEL mutations. Although a double groEL1 groEL2 mutant cannot be constructed, we demonstrate that the quadruple groEL1 groESL3 groEL4 groESL5 and groEL2 groESL3 groEL4 groESL5 mutants are viable. Therefore, like E. coli and other species, S. meliloti only requires one groEL for viability and either groEL1 or groEL2 will suffice. The groEL1 groESL5 double mutant is more severely affected for growth at both 30° and 40°C than the single mutants, suggesting overlapping functions in stress response. During symbiosis the quadruple groEL2 groESL3 groEL4 groESL5 mutant acts like the wild type, but the quadruple groEL1 groESL3 groEL4 groESL5 mutant acts like the groEL1 single mutant, which cannot fully induce nod gene expression and forms ineffective nodules. Therefore, the only groEL gene required for symbiosis is groEL1. However, we show that the other groE genes are expressed in the nodule at lower levels, suggesting minor roles during symbiosis. Combining our data with other data, we conclude that groESL1 encodes the housekeeping GroEL/GroES chaperone and that groESL5 is specialized for stress response.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2006 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.