JB Download to Citation Manager
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
JB Accepts, published online ahead of print on 21 March 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
JB.01792-07v1
190/10/3434    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sharma, U. K.
Right arrow Articles by Chatterji, D.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sharma, U. K.
Right arrow Articles by Chatterji, D.
J. Bacteriol. doi:10.1128/JB.01792-07
Copyright (c) 2008, American Society for Microbiology and/or the Listed Authors/Institutions. All Rights Reserved.

Differential binding mechanisms of anti-sigma factors E. coli Rsd and bacteriophage T4 AsiA to E. coli RNA polymerase lead to diverse physiological consequences

Umender K. Sharma* and Dipankar Chatterji

AstraZeneca R & D, Bellary road, Hebbal, Bangalore, India; Molecular Biophysics unit, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: umender.sharma{at}astrazeneca.com.


   Abstract

Anti-sigma factors E. coli Rsd and bacteriophage T4 AsiA bind to the essential housekeeping sigma factor, {sigma}70, of E. coli. Though, both of them are known to interact with the C-terminal region of {sigma}70, the physiological consequences of this interaction are very different. This study was undertaken with the purpose of deciphering the mechanism by which E. coli Rsd and bacteriophage T4 AsiA inhibit or modulate the activity of E. coli RNA polymerase, which leads to inhibition of E. coli cell growth to different extents. It was found that AsiA is more potent inhibitor of in-vivo transcription and thus causes higher inhibition of E.coli cell growth. Measurement of affinity constants by surface plasmon resonance (SPR) showed that Rsd and AsiA bind to {sigma}70 with similar affinity. Data obtained from in-vivo and in-vitro binding experiments clearly demonstrated that the major difference between AsiA and Rsd is the ability of AsiA to form a stable ternary complex with RNA polymerase. Binding patterns of AsiA and Rsd with {sigma}70 studied by Yeast Two Hybrid system revealed that region 4 of {sigma}70 is involved in binding to both these anti-sigma factors; however, Rsd interacts with other regions of {sigma}70 as well. Taken together, these results suggest that higher inhibition of E. coli growth by AsiA expression is probably, due to the ability of the AsiA protein to trap the holo RNAP rather than higher binding affinity to {sigma}70.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.