ABSTRACT
The divergent structural operons caiTABCDE andfixABCX of Escherichia coli are required for anaerobic carnitine metabolism. Transcriptional monocopylacZ fusion studies showed that both operons are coexpressed during anaerobic growth in the presence of carnitine, respond to common environmental stimuli (like glucose and nitrate), and are modulated positively by the same general regulators, CRP and FNR, and negatively by H-NS. Overproduction of the CaiF specific regulatory protein mediating the carnitine signal restored induction in anfnr mutant, corresponding to its role as the primary target for anaerobiosis. Transcript analysis identified two divergent transcription start points initiating 289 bp apart. DNase I footprinting revealed three sites with various affinities for the binding of the cAMP-CRP complex inside this regulatory region. Site-directed mutagenesis experiments indicated that previously reported perfect CRP motif 1, centered at −41.5 of the caitranscriptional start site, plays a direct role in the solecai activation. In contrast, mutation in CRP site 2, positioned at −69.5 of the fix promoter, caused only a threefold reduction in fix expression. Thus, the role of the third CRP site, located at −126.5 of fix, might be to reinforce the action of site 2. A critical 50-bp cis-acting sequence overlapping the fix mRNA start site was found, by deletion analysis, to be necessary for cai transcription. This region is thought to be involved in transduction of the signal mediated by the CaiF regulator.
To survive, the facultative anaerobeEscherichia coli is able to adapt to a wide variety of growth conditions by synthesizing the appropriate aerobic and anaerobic respiratory pathways. In the absence of oxygen, E. coli can still respire by using a number of terminal electron acceptors, such as nitrate, trimethylamine-N-oxide, or dimethyl sulfoxide (13). When these oxidants are absent, growth of the bacterium can be significantly enhanced in a complex medium supplemented with l-(−)-carnitine [R-(−)-3-hydroxy-4-trimethylaminobutyrate] or its dehydration product crotonobetaine (31). Carnitine is a ubiquitous compound which is mainly found in food of animal origin (6) and is present in the human intestine, where it can be metabolized by bacteria. In contrast to other bacterial species, such as Acinetobacter and Pseudomonas spp., which can utilize carnitine as the sole source of carbon or carbon and nitrogen, respectively (20), members of the familyEnterobacteriaceae do not assimilate the carbon-and-nitrogen skeleton of l-carnitine. Rather, they are able to convert carnitine, via crotonobetaine, to γ-butyrobetaine during anaerobic growth in the presence of other substrates which act as carbon and nitrogen sources (32). The biological significance of this pathway is not clearly understood, but crotonobetaine could serve as an external electron acceptor in the absence of other electron acceptors.
Because of its critical role in mammals, where it ensures the transport of long-chain fatty acids through the inner mitochondrial membrane,l-carnitine is being used in a series of clinical and pharmaceutical applications (18). Therefore, increasing demand for this compound has stimulated a search for its stereospecific production using microbial and enzymatic processes.
The E. coli genes for carnitine metabolism have been recently cloned and sequenced. They comprise the two divergentcaiTABCDE and fixABCX operons which are only induced under anaerobic conditions in the presence ofl-carnitine (9, 10, 12). The caioperon encodes the carnitine dehydratase (caiB) and crotonobetaine reductase (caiA) activities which have been demonstrated to be involved in the two-step carnitine pathway (17, 28). It has been proposed that the remaining part of the cluster directs the synthesis of a carnitine transporter (caiT), a crotonobetaine-carnitine coenzyme A ligase (caiC), an enoyl hydratase-isomerase (caiD), and an enzyme involved in the formation of an active cofactor necessary for the carnitine pathway enzymes (caiE) (9). The fix operon was so named because it encodes four polypeptides with significant similarity to the corresponding gene products from diazotrophs involved in nitrogen fixation (10). Moreover, the homology of the E. coli FixA and FixB proteins to the small (β) and the large (α) subunits of mammalian electron transfer flavoproteins (ETF) (10, 37), as well as similar regulation offix genes with that of carnitine enzymes, suggests a role for the FixABCX proteins in a specific electron transfer related to carnitine transformation. Indeed, operon fusion studies have shown that the fix operon is repressed by the same effectors, in particular, oxygen, glucose, and nitrate, that repress levels of carnitine metabolism enzymes. Moreover, it is subject to global control by the same regulatory proteins which are known to modulate expression of carnitine metabolism, i.e., the cyclic AMP (cAMP) receptor protein (CRP) which mediates the activation of catabolic operons, the transcriptional regulator FNR that is responsible for anaerobic induction, and the DNA-binding protein H-NS (19, 10). In agreement with this, the intergenic region between the divergentcai and fix operons revealed important regulatory features, namely, potential recognition sequences for CRP and H-NS, but no binding site for FNR. In addition, fix operon expression was also markedly decreased in an rpoN mutant lacking the alternative RNA polymerase ς54 factor, leading to the hypothesis that two presumptive −12/−24 RpoN-dependent promoters predicted in the fix direction could be functional (10; see Fig. 2A). In contrast, a putative ς70 promoter sequence was postulated for cai(9; see Fig. 2A).
More recently, the caiF gene, located downstream of thecai operon and lying in the opposite orientation with respect to cai, was reported to enhance levels ofcai and fix expression when cloned in multicopy (11). Based on the fact that inactivation of thecaiF gene totally abolished transcription of caiand fix operons, it has been proposed that the 15-kDa CaiF protein acts as a specific transcriptional regulator for carnitine metabolism. Like cai and fix operons, thecaiF gene appeared to be positively controlled by CRP and FNR and negatively controlled by H-NS and the NarL (plus nitrate) regulator. In contrast, its expression was independent of the presence of carnitine. Thus, the mechanism by which the carnitine pathway is regulated appears to be rather complex, since it involves a number of general and specific regulators acting at different levels.
In this study, we demonstrate that the structural cai andfix operons are transcribed in a strictly coordinated manner from two divergent promoters. We have attempted to identify the elements present in the 467-bp intergenic regulatory region which are required for transcription in each direction and ruled out the presumed direct role for the RNA polymerase ς54 factor. We also show evidence that both promoters are directly activated by binding of the cAMP-CRP complex.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Strains, plasmids, and growth conditions.The bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table1. Plasmid pM-CFK was constructed in two steps. First, a 400-bp StuI-EcoRI fragment containing the coding sequence of caiF was amplified by PCR and introduced into the polylinker cloning sites of vector pMAL-c (New England Biolabs), downstream from the malE gene, resulting in the production of a maltose-binding protein fusion protein expressed from the tac promoter. Second, the SmaI-digesteduidA′-Kmr cassette from plasmid pUIDK3 (2) was inserted into the ScaI site of thebla gene, giving rise to plasmid pM-CFK. Bacteria were grown aerobically in Luria-Bertani broth (LB) at 30 or 37°C, as indicated in Results, or on plates with LB supplemented with 1.5% agar. Anaerobic growth took place in either tightly stoppered 500-ml bottles or 25-ml screw-cap tubes filled almost to the top with LB or buffered (pH 6.5) TYEP medium without glucose (4), supplemented with 2 μM ammonium molybdate and 2 μM sodium selenite, as described previously (38). For monitoring of caiT-lacZ andfixA-lacZ fusions, growth was achieved in a 2-liter Setric fermentor filled with 1.6 liters of LB supplemented with molybdate, selenite, and 20 mM dl-carnitine. Anaerobic conditions were ensured by saturating the culture medium with a stream of nitrogen gas. For growth of the rpoN mutant, 0.01% glutamine was added to the medium. When required, antibiotics were added at the following final concentrations: ampicillin at 50 or 100 μg/ml, kanamycin at 50 μg/ml, and chloramphenicol at 20 μg/ml.
Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study
Standard molecular biology techniques.The following standard molecular biology techniques were carried out as described by Sambrook et al. (29): DNA isolation, restriction analysis, construction of recombinant DNA, and transformation into E. coli.
β-Galactosidase assay.β-Galactosidase activity was measured at 30°C on whole cells rendered permeable by addition of 0.0025% sodium dodecyl sulfate–5% chloroform (26). One unit of specific activity is defined as 1 nmol ofo-nitrophenol liberated per min per mg (dry weight) of bacteria. The values reported here are averages of the results of at least three independent experiments performed in duplicate that did not vary by more than 15% of the mean.
DNA sequencing.All PCR products, as well as insertions in pJEL250 (Table 1), were sequenced by using universal and reverse oligonucleotide primers with the T7 sequencing kit, purchased from Pharmacia, and the chain termination procedure (30).
Construction of lacZ fusions.The list of pJEL250 recombinant plasmids used (from pX1C to pEBF) is given in Table1. For the extension and orientation of fragments from thecai-fix intergenic region borne by the plasmids, see Fig. 2. Plasmids designated pE1E2 (C or F) were constructed by digesting plasmid pCTK with restriction enzymes E1 and E2, delimiting the insert (e.g., pEBF was obtained by digesting pCTK with EcoRV (E) andBglII (B) [Table 1; see Fig. 2]). The generated fragment harboring a part of the cai-fix regulatory region was filled in with Klenow polymerase and subcloned into the dephosphorylatedSmaI site of pBluescript SK+. Further restrictions withEcoRI and BamHI allowed us to introduce the fragment, in either the cai (pE1E2C) or the fix (pE1E2F) orientation, into the corresponding sites located in front of the promoterlesslacZ gene of monocopy fusion vector pJEL250 (35). Plasmids called pKE1E2 were made in a similar manner but required additional steps. A SacI Tn903 (Kmr) cassette from vector pUC4-KISS (Pharmacia Biotech) was introduced into the SacI site of pBluescript SK+ containing the region of interest in order to provide fragments of a more suitable size for subsequent subcloning. After digestion by EcoRI and PvuII, fragments were filled in with Klenow polymerase and introduced into the dephosphorylated SmaI site of pUIDC1 (2). The twoEcoRI sites flanking the SmaI site were used to clone the fragments into the EcoRI site of pJEL250 in both orientations with an additional Kmr selection. When the Kmr cassette was located between the tested promoter and the lacZ gene, it was deleted by a BamHI digestion, giving rise to a pE1E2 plasmid. In the other case, promoters of the kan gene and thelacZ gene were confirmed as being orientated in opposite directions in the resulting pKE1E2 plasmid. Construction of plasmids called pX(1,2)C and pKX(1,2)F differed only in the first step of cloning. In this case, fragments of interest were generated by PCR and then treated as described above.
Primer extension analysis of transcript.Total RNA was isolated from E. coli cells grown anaerobically in rich medium under inducing conditions. It was extracted by the frozen-phenol method described by Maes and Messens (25). RNA concentration was estimated spectrophotometrically and after electrophoresis on a formaldehyde denaturing 1% agarose gel. Primer extension reactions were performed as described by Ausubel et al. (1), with 40 μg of total RNA and about 4 · 104 cpm of [γ-32P]ATP end-labeled primers (Eurogentec), using the avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase primer extension system kit from Promega. For cai transcript analysis, a 24-bp synthetic oligonucleotide, able to hybridize to the noncoding strand between nucleotides +31 and +54 (5′-CGGCGGAAAGAAAACCTTTGGTTC-3′) of the caiTgene, was chosen. For determination of the transcriptional start site of the fix operon, a 24-bp primer (5′-CATCAGGCACGCACTTATAGCAAG-3′) complementary to the region of the noncoding strand between nucleotides +19 and +42 of thefixA gene was used. Products of the primer extension reactions were separated on 6% polyacrylamide-urea sequencing gels in parallel with sequence reactions of pCTK performed by using the same oligonucleotide. A 2-week exposure was required for detection of distinct signals.
S1 mapping.Total RNA was isolated as described for primer extension experiments. The labeled restriction fragments used were obtained from pCTB by endonuclease restriction with eitherBglII for cai or AflII forfix, removal of the 5′ phosphate by alkaline phosphatase (Boehringer Mannheim), and 5′ labeling with [γ-32P]ATP and polynucleotide kinase (Promega). A second digestion withEcoRV for cai and HpaI forfix generated fragments of 507 and 592 bp, respectively, which were further purified by using the Qiagen QIAquick extraction kit. S1 nuclease mapping experiments were carried out as described by Brakhage et al. (7), by incubating 50 μg of RNA with 5.104 cpm of the appropriate probe. After overnight hybridization at 42.5°C for cai and 45.5°C forfix, digestion was achieved with 400 U of S1 nuclease (Boehringer Mannheim). RNA-protected DNA probes were resolved by electrophoresis on a 6% polyacrylamide sequencing gel.
Preparation of operator fragments for binding studies.The regulatory region of the cai and fix operons was obtained by cutting plasmid pCTB with either EcoRV andBglII or BspHI and HpaI for labeling of one or the other strand. DNA fragments were end labeled with [α-32P]dCTP (3,000 Ci/mmol) (Amersham) in the presence of the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase. These labeled fragments were further purified by using the Qiagen QIAquick extraction kit.
Gel retardation assay.Binding of CRP on thecai-fix regulatory region was performed as described by Søgaard-Andersen and Valentin-Hansen (34). CRP protein, purified by a procedure derived from that of Ghosaini et al. (14, 27), was a gift of W. Nasser (this laboratory). In general, the reaction was carried out in 20 μl containing 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.8), 50 mM KCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 50 μM cAMP, 4 μg of acetylated bovine serum albumin, and 1 μg of poly(dI-dC)-(dI-dC) (Pharmacia LKB) as bulk carrier DNA. After addition of the DNA probe (50,000 cpm) and various amounts of purified CRP, the reaction mixtures were incubated for 30 min at 30°C, adjusted to 5% in glycerol, and then loaded onto a 4% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel and electrophoresed in 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8) containing 50 μM cAMP. Gels were then dried and exposed to Amersham MP film.
Footprinting with DNase I.DNase I footprint analysis was performed by using a procedure modified from that of Søgaard-Andersen et al. (33). About 105 cpm of DNA probe, labeled at one end, was incubated for 30 min at 30°C with various concentrations of CRP and 50 μM cAMP in the buffer used for the mobility shift assay. The reaction mixtures were adjusted to 10 mM MgCl2 and 5 mM CaCl2. DNase I was then added (2.10−3 U; Boehringer Mannheim), and the mixture was incubated for 2 min at 30°C. DNase I digestion was blocked by the addition of 25 μl of stop solution (100 mM EDTA, 0.4 mg of yeast tRNA/ml, pH 8). A 50-μl volume of ice-cold Tris-EDTA (pH 8) was then added. After phenol-chloroform extraction, DNA fragments were ethanol precipitated, resuspended in 5 μl of a formamide-dye mixture (1), and separated by electrophoresis on a 6% polyacrylamide sequencing gel. Bands were detected by autoradiography.
Site-directed mutagenesis.Oligonucleotide-mediated, site-specific mutagenesis was performed as described by Kunkel et al. (22). Point mutations in the regulatory region of thecai-fix operons were introduced by using a two-step PCR achieved with Pwo polymerase (Boehringer Mannheim). Primers generating the ends of the modified fragment were those used for primer extension experiments, and plasmid pCTB served as the DNA target. The end product was digested by BspHI, filled in with Klenow enzyme, and subcloned in plasmid pBluescript KS+. Introduction in pJEL250 was achieved as described above.
To test the involvement of putative ς54 binding site 1 (see Fig. 2A and 5 [562 to 549 bp]), a 25-bp primer (5′-GTGTGTAAAATAGCATCTGACTTTC-3′) was used to convert the −24/−12 promoter consensus sequence, GG-N10-GC (23), to GT-N-TG-N7-GC. To test the functional importance of the CRP1 and CRP2 binding sites (see Fig. 5), mutations affecting the most conserved motif, 5′ TGTGA (36), were obtained by using a 31-bp primer (5′-TGTAACACCAATTCGAGAATACAGCTTATTG-3′) for CRP1 (crp101) and a 34-bp primer (5′-CGCCATGTTTTCAATATTGCGAAGGAACTTAACA-3′) for CRP2 (crp200). Alternatively, the CRP1 box was destroyed by changing the perfect consensus TGTGA-N6-TCACA into TGTGA-N3-TCACA (15) (mutationcrp100). This was achieved by using a 22-bp primer with the sequence 5′-TGTGACACTCACAGAATACAGC-3′. All mutations were verified by sequencing.
RESULTS
Parallel expression of the cai and fixdivergent operons during cell growth.Transcription of bothcai and fix operons is induced during anaerobic growth in the presence of dl-carnitine (9, 10). To determine whether the corresponding promoters function in a coordinate manner, expression of caiT-lacZ andfixA-lacZ operon fusions borne by monocopy plasmids pAB20 and pAB30 was measured in wild-type strain NM522 along the growth curve. The pattern of caiT-lacZ expression was essentially identical to that observed for fixA-lacZ throughout the entire cell growth period (Fig. 1). Expression from either fusion was induced from the mid-log phase, reached a maximum in the late exponential phase, and then remained constant for several hours in the stationary phase. The slightly higher level of β-galactosidase activity obtained with thefixA-lacZ fusion over that found with thecaiT-lacZ fusion might be due to differences in the construction of the fusions or may possibly reflect a small difference in the strength of the two promoters. The previous observation that carnitine dehydratase activity is optimally synthesized at the end of the exponential phase (19) is in agreement with gene expression. This pattern may reflect the prerequisite synthesis of the CaiF regulatory protein, which controls the activation of bothcai and fix operons (11). A basal expression level of the caiF gene in the early log phase is consistent with this hypothesis (data not shown).
Growth phase regulation of the cai andfix operons. Strain NM522 harboring either plasmid pAB20 (caiT-lacZ) (A) or plasmid pAB30 (fixA-lacZ) (B) was grown anaerobically at 30°C in LB supplemented with 1 μM sodium molybdate, 1 μM sodium selenite, and 20 mM dl-carnitine. Cell samples were collected for measurement of optical density (OD) and for determination of β-galactosidase specific activity.
Regulation of expression of the cai operon.To examine more thoroughly the expression pattern of the caioperon in relation to the known regulation of carnitine metabolism (19) and the fix operon (10), β-galactosidase levels from the caiT-lacZ fusion were determined under various environmental conditions. As expected,caiT-lacZ expression was only observed in the absence of oxygen and was strongly induced by the presence ofdl-carnitine (Table 2).l-Carnitine and crotonobetaine were also able to induce transcription at the same level. In contrast, other intermediary compounds of the pathway, d-carnitine and γ-butyrobetaine (Table 2), as well as additional tested betaines, choline and glycine betaine (data not shown), had no effect. Addition of glucose led to total suppression of cai expression in accordance with catabolite repression of carnitine metabolism (32). Of the three anaerobic terminal electron acceptors tested, nitrate exerted a completely negative effect, whereas trimethylamine-N-oxide reduced cai expression by a factor of three and fumarate had no influence (Table 2). Therefore, the various effectors tested displayed an effect on cai expression similar to that previously observed on fix expression (10).
Expression of the caiT-lacZ fusion under various environmental conditions and in various genetic backgrounds
Global regulatory proteins CRP, FNR, and H-NS are involved in the synthesis of carnitine dehydratase activity (9, 11). To document the role of each regulator in cai operon expression, the caiT-lacZ fusion was transferred into isogenic strains that contained a mutation in one of the relevant regulatory genes. caiT-lacZ expression was dramatically abolished in crp and fnr mutants while it was increased threefold in the hns mutant (Table 2). Thus, CRP and FNR positively control cai expression and H-NS exerts a negative control. A similar pattern was previously reported for the control of fix operon expression (10). Surprisingly, mutation of the rpoN gene, which encodes the alternative RNA polymerase ς54 factor, caused a fivefold diminution of cai expression, which was comparable to the reduction observed for fix expression (10). This was unexpected, since the only potential consensus sequences for binding of ς54-associated RNA polymerase found in thecai-fix intergenic region were oriented in thefix direction (10). This suggests indirect control by ς54.
Expression of the caiT-lacZ and fixA-lacZfusions in various mutants in the presence of a multicopycaiF gene.The existence of a potential transcriptional activator of carnitine metabolism, designated CaiF, has been previously established (11). Expression of thecaiF gene is dependent on the same general regulatory proteins, H-NS, CRP, FNR, and transcription factor RpoN (11), which control cai and fixexpression (Table 2) (10). In particular, lesions in thecrp, fnr, and rpoN genes decreased expression of the caiF-lacZ fusion at various levels, the most dramatic effect being displayed by fnr. However, compared with that of cai and fix, expression ofcaiF was less severely affected. It was therefore interesting to examine the effect of overproduced CaiF by introducing either plasmid pRL101 or pM-CFK, which carries multicopies of thecaiF gene into regulation mutants harboring the fusions. When plasmid pM-CFK was used, reduction or suppression ofcai and fix expression in the rpoN andfnr mutants, respectively, was completely restored to the enhanced level found in the wild-type strain (Table3). Thus, control exerted by the RpoN and FNR proteins on cai and fix expression appears to be mediated mainly via the caiF gene. Intermediate levels of stimulation were observed with plasmid pRL101, the fnrmutation having the most limiting effect. This difference was attributed to the fact that the regulatory-promoter region ofcaiF was still present in plasmid pRL101 while it was missing in gene fusion plasmid pM-CFK. As a consequence,caiF expressed from pRL101 was still partially dependent on its known regulatory proteins while it totally escaped their control when expressed from the tac promoter of plasmid pM-CFK. In contrast, no enhancement of cai and fixexpression by plasmid pRL101 was detected in the crp mutant, which strongly suggests that control by CRP still operates at the level of the cai-fix intergenic regulatory region.
Stimulation of expression of the caiT-lacZ andfixA-lacZ fusions in various mutants by the overexpressed regulatory gene caiF
Deletion analysis of the cai-fix intergenic regulatory region.Sequencing data had previously revealed the presence of putative divergent promoters for the cai and fixoperons, as well as possible binding sites for the fixation of regulatory proteins (Fig. 2A). To localize the areas of interest, various fragments of thecai-fix intergenic region were subcloned into monocopy operon fusion vector pJEL250 (35) in both orientations. The hybrid plasmids were introduced into wild-type strain NM522 andrpoN mutant MAM102, and β-galactosidase activity was measured after anaerobic growth in the presence ofdl-carnitine (Fig. 2). It should be noted that no β-galactosidase activity was detectable in the absence of the inducerdl-carnitine. As expected, plasmids pX1C and pKX1F, which carry a 580-bp segment encompassing the entire regulatory region, conferred the same level of expression on cai andfix as did the larger plasmids pAB20 and pAB30 (Table 3), respectively.
Effects of deletions in the cai-fixintergenic region on in vivo expression of the caiT-lacZ andfixA-lacZ fusions. (A) Schematic representation of thecai-fix divergent promoter region as previously suggested by Eichler et al. (9, 10). The first open reading frames of thefix and cai operons initiate at positions 324 and 792, respectively. Curved arrows indicate putative transcriptional start sites. Two proposed binding sites for the ς54-associated RNA polymerase are indicated by open diamonds, and one possible −10 box is represented by an open rectangle. Two remarkable inverted repeats, which might have a regulatory role, are designated 1 and 2. A perfect consensus sequence for the binding of CRP is shown by an oval. (B) Deletion analysis of the cai-fix intercistronic region. The arrows show the extension and orientation of fragments linked to the lacZreporter gene on monocopy plasmid pJEL250. The coordinates at the top correspond to the numbering of nucleotides in accordance with the previously published sequence (9) and give useful restriction sites. The table on the right shows the names of thelacZ fusion plasmids listed in Table 1 and the relevant β-galactosidase activities. Strains NM522 (wild type [wt]) and MAM102 (rpoN), carrying the lacZ fusion plasmids, were grown anaerobically at 30°C in TYEP medium in the presence of 20 mM dl-carnitine. β-Galactosidase activities were expressed as nanomoles of o-nitrophenol produced per milligram (dry weight) of bacteria per minute. Each value represents the average of four independent experiments. nd, not determined. (C) Schematic representation of the cai-fix divergent promoter region as deduced from the complete study reported in this paper (see also Fig. 5).
A short, 48-bp, deletion upstream of the fixA coding sequence totally abolished fix expression (compare plasmids pKX2F and pEBF in Fig. 2B). Distal deletions, extending to 200 bp upstream of the caiT coding sequence, resulted in a three- to fourfold decrease in the level of β-galactosidase activity (plasmids pKEMF and pKEAF), which may account for an incorrect conformation of the truncated region. Plasmid pKEAF contained the shortest, 209-bp, EcoRV-AsnI fragment, allowing significant expression of the fix operon. These results indicate that previously proposed regulatory features in the control region of fix (Fig. 2A), namely, the CRP box and the putative ς54-dependent transcription start site 2, are not involved in fix expression. The smallest fragment tested which conferred a significant level of cai transcription was the 316-bp EcoRV-MluI fragment harbored by plasmid pEMC (Fig. 2B). The absence of the predicted ς70-dependent transcription start site in this construct (Fig. 2A) suggested that the cai promoter is located upstream. Indeed, removal of the upstream region including the CRP-binding site prevented any expression of the caiT-lacZfusion in plasmid pEAC. Surprisingly, deletion of the 48-bp region upstream of fix (plasmid pX2C versus plasmid pEMC) led to complete loss of cai operon transcription, although no significant feature was evident in this area. This result was further substantiated by the absence of cai expression in construct pSSC, which contains an additional 109-bp deletion. The possible significance of this area is discussed later. When promoter-active constructs were tested in an rpoN mutant, a threefold reduction of β-galactosidase levels was observed relative to the wild-type strain (Fig. 2B). A similar diminution of cai andfix expression, as well as the absence of a properly oriented RpoN consensus sequence for cai (10), argues in favor of indirect control of both operons by RpoN. An improved schematic representation of the divergent cai-fixregulatory region, as deduced from this deletion analysis and from data reported below, is shown in Fig. 2C.
Identification of cai and fix transcription start sites.To identify the promoters responsible forcai and fix transcription, total RNA isolated from wild-type strain NM522 and its rpoN derivative, with or without plasmid pCTK (which carries multicopies of the entire intergenic cai-fix region), was subjected to primer extension analysis and S1 nuclease mapping. A major extension product of 115 bp was detected for the fix-specific transcript (Fig.3A). As expected from operon fusion studies (Fig. 2), transcription was reduced in an rpoNmutant (lane 1 compared with lane 3), but it was increased in the presence of multicopy plasmid pCTK (lane 3 compared with lane 2). The T-397 residue 73 bp upstream of the fixA start codon was designated the transcription start site. Typical features for a ς70-dependent promoter were found at appropriate positions upstream, namely, well-conserved −10 (TAAAGT) and −35 (GTGACA) boxes. In addition, the suspected role of the two ς54 consensus sequences predicted far upstream infix expression (Fig. 2A) was clearly ruled out by the following observations: (i) use of a second primer hybridizing 40 bp upstream of the fixA start codon, as well as S1 nuclease mapping of the 5′ end, did not allow us to identify other extension products (data not shown), and (ii) partial deletion mutagenesis of the ς54 consensus sequence 1 (see Materials and Methods) had no effect on fix expression. Determination of the transcription start site for fix confirms deletion analysis data which indicate that the 50-bp surrounding region is critical for significant expression (Fig. 2, pEBF versus pKX2F).
Identification of the cai and fixtranscriptional start sites. Primer extension analyses of thefix (A) and cai (B) operon transcripts were carried out with RNA isolated from cells grown under anaerobic conditions in the presence of 20 mM dl-carnitine. The first four lanes A, C, G, and T, give the DNA sequence of plasmid pCTK generated by using the same primer. (A) Lanes: 1, MAM102 (rpoN)/pCTK; 2, NM522; 3, NM522/pCTK. (B) Lanes: 1, MAM102 (rpoN)/pCTK; 2, NM522/pCTK; 3, NM522. The −10 region and the transcription start point (+1) of the cai andfix operons are indicated on the right. (C) S1 nuclease mapping of the 5′ end of the cai transcript. RNA was isolated as described for primer extension assays. The TGCA sequence is the same as in panel B and serves as a size marker. Lanes: 1, MAM102 (rpoN)/pCTK; 2, NM522/pCTK; 3, probe without S1 nuclease digestion. The sizes of the detected bands are on the left. The start site (+1) of the cai operon and coordinates (in parentheses) relative to Fig. 2 are on the right.
When a primer which specifically hybridized within the caiTcoding sequence was used, a single extension product was seen, corresponding to an initiation at the G-686 residue located 106 bp upstream of the caiT start codon (Fig. 3B). As already observed for fix, transcription was reduced in anrpoN background (lane 1 versus lane 2) and elevated in the presence of plasmid pCTK (lane 2 versus lane 3). Inspection of the DNA sequence of the promoter region revealed the presence of a possible ς70 promoter with a −10 box (CATTAT) and the previously observed consensus sequence for CRP (TGTGA-6 bp-TCACA) centered at position −41.5 (9). To verify the location of the cai start point, an S1 nuclease mapping experiment was performed. A distinct 202-bp fragment was found (Fig. 3C), confirming the existence of a unique cai promoter located at the above-reported position. Determination of the caitranscription start site correlates with the finding that plasmid pEMC, which harbors an insert terminating 7 bp downstream of this site, allows significant expression of the caiT-lacZ fusion, in contrast to plasmid pEAC, whose insert terminates far upstream (Fig.2).
Interaction between CRP and the cai-fix regulatory region.To assess the involvement of CRP in the activation of transcription of cai and fix operons (Tables 2and 3), the binding specificity of purified CRP to thecai-fix intergenic promoter region was tested in vitro by performing gel mobility shift assays. As shown in Fig.4A, three types of complexes were observed, depending on the concentration of CRP, which may indicate that multiple CRP-binding sites are present in the cai-fixpromoter-regulatory region or that oligomerization of CRP bound to one or more sites might occur. To localize the potential CRP-binding sites more precisely, DNase I footprinting was carried out for both strands of the DNA-regulatory region. The exact locations of the footprints are presented in Fig. 5. It is clear from Fig. 4 that CRP has a higher affinity for site 1 than for the other two sites, since occupancy of site 1 occurred at a very low CRP concentration (6.17 nM) (Fig. 4B and C), shifting 100% of the free DNA (Fig. 4A). Moreover, this protected region corresponds to the binding of CRP on the perfect consensus sequence situated at position −41.5 of the transcription start site for cai. Site 2 was largely occupied in the presence of an intermediate concentration of CRP (123 nM) (Fig. 4, compare lanes 3 in panels B and C with lane 3 in panel A). It determines the presence of a region (GGTGA-N6-TAACA) that shows homology with the consensus CRP-binding site and is centered at position −69.5 relative to the fix transcription site, which is compatible with a direct role in activation of transcription (8). A deeper examination of footprints with thefix coding strand revealed the location of a third region observed only at a high concentration of CRP (1.23 μM) (Fig. 4, compare lanes 4 in panels C and A). It contains a GGTGA-N6-AAACA sequence centered at position −126.5 versus the fixtranscription start site.
Specific binding of CRP in the cai-fixregulatory region. (A) Gel mobility shift assay of thecai-fix intercistronic region with purified CRP. The α-32P-end-labeled 396-bp BspHI-HpaI DNA insert of plasmid pCTB was incubated in the presence of 1 μg of poly(dI-dC)-(dI-dC) without CRP (lane 1) or with 6.17 nM (lane 2), 123 nM (lane 3), or 1.23 μM (lane 4) CRP. The reactions were carried out in the presence of 50 μM cAMP. Free (F) and CRP-bound (B1, B2, and B3) DNA bands are indicated. (B and C) DNase I footprinting of the CRP-DNA interactions in the cai and fix promoter region. Labeling was performed on both strands independently, from either the BglII end of the 507-bpEcoRV-BglII fragment corresponding to the coding strand of cai (B) or the BspHI end of the 396-bpBspHI-HpaI fragment corresponding to the coding strand of fix (C). Protected regions are indicated by vertical brackets and marked 1 through 3. The CRP concentrations are as follows: lane 1, 0; lane 2, 6.17 nM; lane 3, 123 nM; lane 4, 1.23 μM. The values to the left of panels B and C are coordinates relative to the transcription start sites of cai and fix, respectively.
Locations of the sequences protected by CRP from cleavage by DNase I. The protected sequences, termed CRP1 to CRP3, are represented by horizontal brackets. The locations of the transcription initiation sites of fixA and caiT are indicated by arrows designated +1. The putative −10 and −35 boxes are underlined (for fixA) or overlined (for caiT), and two inverted repeats are highlighted by converging dashed arrows. The start codons of fixA and caiT are in boldface. Useful restriction sites are also noted.
The hypothesis of a direct role of CRP sites 1 and 2 in the activation of transcription of cai and fix, respectively, was tested by examining the effect of alterations in the two sites on expression of caiT-lacZ and fixA-lacZ fusions. Changes in the affinity of CRP for the different mutated sites was tested by gel retardation assays and DNase I footprinting experiments. No binding of CRP on mutated site 1 was observed, whatever the protein concentration used. In contrast, CRP was still able to bind to similarly mutated site 2 but with decreased affinity (data not shown). These in vitro observations are in good correlation with the in vivo results presented in Table 4, which shows that mutations in site 1 resulted in total suppression of the activity of the cai promoter, whereas introduction of a mutation in site 2 only partially decreased transcription from the fixpromoter. In both cases, mutations of CRP sites had no effect on the corresponding distal promoters; i.e., the level of fixtranscription remained unaffected in the absence of CRP fixation on site 1, and cai was normally expressed in the presence of a mutated site 2.
Effects of crp mutations oncaiT-lacZ and fixA-lacZ expression
DISCUSSION
The present investigation clearly demonstrates that the two divergent cai and fix structural operons involved in the carnitine pathway are simultaneously expressed, under anaerobic conditions, in the presence of l-carnitine and controlled in parallel in response to a number of effectors and regulatory genes (Fig. 1; Tables 2 and 3). Genetic studies provide evidence that activation of both operons depends on the action of the two structurally and functionally related global activators CRP and FNR and on the specific activator CaiF, which mediates the carnitine signal. It is particularly noteworthy that the relative strengths of the two promoters, measured by both the in vivo monocopy lacZ fusion technique (Fig. 1) and in vitro mRNA analysis (Fig. 3), are very similar, supporting strictly controlled coordinate expression of the two gene clusters.
The occurrence of divergent operons is relatively frequent in bacteria (3), but it does not systematically imply a physiological linkage (24) or a common regulatory pattern (5). Deletion analysis of the cai-fix intercistronic region (Fig.2) and determination of the exact transcription start site of eachcai or fix operon (Fig. 3) allowed us to conclude that the two promoters are in the back-to-back arrangement of divergent promoters defined by Beck and Warren (3) and that they are separated by a 289-bp region which comprises binding sites for regulatory proteins. Few functionally related divergent structural operons of this category have been described. One of the best-characterized examples is represented by themalEp-malKp divergent regulatory region, which directs expression of malEFG and malK-lamB-malM, the operons which encode components of the maltodextrin transport system. In this model, several features relating to the cai-fixcoordinated control could be outlined: (i) malEp andmalKp promoter activity depends on the synergistic action of the global regulator CRP and the specific activator of the maltose regulon, MalT, (ii) the two promoters have a 271-bp regulatory region in common that is located between their transcription sites, and (iii) they are relatively similar in strength (36).
Both cai and fix promoters were found to possess features typical for activation by ς70-associated RNA polymerase. This finding was as expected for cai after inspection of the DNA sequence (9), and the data presented here permitted us to appropriately position the deduced −10 region (Fig. 3 and 5). In contrast, because of its homology with the ς54-dependent fix genes of members of the family Rhizobiaceae and the detection of potential −12/−24 elements in the DNA sequence, the E. coli fix operon was suspected of being transcribed under the control of the ς54-associated RNA polymerase (10). However, based on the presence of relatively well-conserved −10 and −35 hexamer sequences with respect to the transcription start point offix (Fig. 5), it seems reasonable to suggest that thefix operon may depend on the ς70 transcription factor for its expression. This result is of particular relevance since the cai and fix operons appear to be coregulated in the presence of carnitine. This observation is consistent with the classification of these E. coli fix gene products in the ETF-like protein family, which, in contrast to housekeeping ETFs linked to the fatty acid degradation pathway, are synthesized only under specific conditions (37).
Evidence is presented that CRP is directly involved in the expression of the cai and fix genes and plays a crucial role in the activation of carnitine metabolism. The regulatory effect of CRP was first inferred from the absence of induction ofcaiT-lacZ and fixA-lacZ fusions in acrp mutant (Tables 2 and 3). Investigation of the ability of purified CRP to bind to the cai-fix promoter-regulatory region revealed that the protein is, in fact, able to bind to three distinct sites with different affinities (Fig. 4 and 5). Moreover, the location of each binding site is characteristic of one of the three classes of CRP-dependent promoters which have been described by Ebright (8). Occupancy of the perfect consensus sequence with the highest affinity at position −41.5 relative to the caitranscription start point (Fig. 5) corresponds to a class II promoter in which the DNA-binding site for CRP overlaps the DNA-binding site for RNA polymerase. In agreement with this, no −35 determinant was detected. In contrast, the lower-affinity binding site, located at position −69.5 with respect to the fix transcription start point, designated the fix promoter as belonging to class I, in which CRP would promote fix transcription by interacting with the α subunit of RNA polymerase. Accordingly, well-conserved −10 and −35 boxes for the binding of RNA polymerase were found (Fig.5). The third binding site detected for CRP displayed the lowest affinity and was the most distal upstream from the cai andfix transcription start points, at positions −162.5 and −126.5, respectively (Fig. 5). Site-directed mutagenesis of CRP sites 1 and 2 clearly demonstrated that site 1 is required to activate only transcription of the cai operon whereas site 2 only plays a role in the activation of the fix operon. CRP is considered to behave as a simple transcription activator when it binds closer to the promoter start, i.e., at positions −41.5, −61.5, and −71.5 (8, 21). In these cases, CRP-cAMP alone is sufficient to activate initiation of transcription by directly contacting the RNA polymerase. This situation might occur in the case of thecai promoter. For the fix promoter, one could imagine that the partial action of CRP primary binding site 2 might be reinforced by that of distal site 3, which will therefore contribute to the modulation or coordination of fix expression in a cooperative manner. It would be interesting to know if the particular localization of CRP2 and CRP3 boxes, which are arranged symmetrically in the spacing determined by the succession of inverted repeats 1 and 2 (Fig. 5), is of functional significance. The mechanism of activation by CRP is clearly different from that occurring at the divergentmalEp-malKp promoters, which are simultaneously controlled by an array of three binding sites for CRP, all located at distal positions in between (36), and forming a high-order structure responsible for activation, assisting direct activation by the MalT primary regulator.
In addition to the effect of CRP, activation of cai andfix promoters has been shown to be subject to the essential function of CaiF, the specific activator of carnitine metabolism (11). Interestingly, control by anaerobiosis of the carnitine pathway is shown here to be exerted exclusively through the transacting CaiF protein. Consistent with this idea is the observation that maximal levels of lacZ fusions reflectingcai or fix expression can be reached in anfnr mutant, provided that a constitutively synthesized CaiF protein is present (Table 3). This is in striking contrast to the action of CRP, which plays a direct role in the promoters of thecai and fix operons (Fig. 4 and 5), in addition to modulating caiF expression (11).
As pointed out above (Fig. 2), minimal promoter fragments still exhibiting transcription ability were all induced by carnitine, indicating that transduction of the signal was mediated by these DNA sequences. Surprisingly, removal of the 48 bp surrounding the transcription initiation site of fix led to total suppression of cai expression (plasmid pX2C versus plasmid pEMC), indicating that this area, corresponding to the RNA polymerase binding site for fix transcription, was also necessary forcai transcription activation. Primer extension and S1 mapping experiments (Fig. 3) have clearly shown that the caioperon is transcribed from a unique mRNA start site located 106 bp from the caiT coding sequence, thus, around 260 bp away from the short deleted region. Moreover, the assignment of CRP sites 1 and 2 to the respective activation of cai and fix (Table4) further substantiates the fact that the two promoter regions are distinct from each other. The in vivo inducing role of thecaiF gene in the presence of carnitine (11) would be better understood after a thorough investigation of the in vitro binding of the purified CaiF protein to the divergent regulatory region. Very preliminary data suggest that CaiF could bind upstream of the −35 region of the fix promoter. In this context, deletion of the adjacent region reported in plasmid pX2C might severely affect the stability of activator binding. Further studies will be aimed at analyzing the interaction of CaiF with the cai-fixdivergent regulatory region and examining its possible synergistic action with CRP in the coactivation process.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by grants from the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique and the Direction de la Recherche et des Etudes doctorales (Action Internationale).
We thank W. Nasser for scientific advice and discussion and for the gift of purified CRP. We also thank G. Barbeaux for her participation in some experiments, V. James for reading the manuscript, and J. Robert-Baudouy and H. P. Kleber for support and constant interest in this work.
FOOTNOTES
- Received 26 November 1997.
- Accepted 16 March 1998.
- Copyright © 1998 American Society for Microbiology
