Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Bacteriology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Plant Microbiology

Identification and Characterization of theErwinia amylovora rpoS Gene: RpoS Is Not Involved in Induction of Fireblight Disease Symptoms

M. Anderson, C. E. Pollitt, I. S. Roberts, J. A. Eastgate
M. Anderson
School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. E. Pollitt
School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
I. S. Roberts
School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. A. Eastgate
School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JB.180.24.6789-6792.1998
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The Erwinia amylovora rpoS gene, encoding the alternative sigma factor RpoS, has been cloned and characterized. Though highly sensitive to a number of environmental stresses, anE. amylovora rpoS mutant was not compromised in its ability to grow or cause disease symptoms within apple seedlings or in an overwintering model.

Erwinia amylovora is the causative organism of the disease fireblight, which affects members of the family Pomoideae (7). Studies on nonpathogenic mutants of E. amylovora have identified a number of virulence factors, including the extracellular polysaccharide (EPS) and the products of the hrp and dsp gene clusters (29). Little is known concerning how pathogens sense entry into the host; however, it has been proposed that bacteria respond to a generalized nutrient limitation which activates expression of the alternative sigma factor RpoS, promoting transcription of genes required for in vivo survival (12). The alternative sigma factor RpoS regulates a panel of genes which serve to maintain viability during periods of starvation and environmental stress (15). In addition, a direct role for RpoS in regulation of virulence factor expression has been established for a number of pathogens (11, 13). We describe the cloning and characterization of the E. amylovora rpoS gene and the effect of insertional inactivation of the chromosomal copy on E. amylovora virulence.

Cloning and expression of the E. amylovora rpoSgene.An E. amylovora cosmid library (2) was introduced into strain ZK918 (R. Kolter, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.), which has a β-galactosidase reporter fusion in thebolZ gene and an insertional mutation in the chromosomal copy of rpoS. Transcription of bolZ is dependent on the rpoS gene product, and complementation of the mutation by E. amylovora rpoS was visualized as β-galactosidase activity (30). Of 1,200 E. amylovora cosmid clones, two, pPCL911 and pPCL420, showed high levels of β-galactosidase expression during stationary-phase growth (Fig. 1). Southern blot analysis of pPCL911 and pPCL420, using the Escherichia coli rpoS gene (24) as a probe, confirmed that both cosmids carried a homologue of E. coli rpoS (data not shown). A single 4-kbEcoRV fragment of pPCL911 that hybridized with the E. coli rpoS probe was subcloned into pBluescript SK+ (Stratagene) to generate plasmid pMAEV9, which retained the ability to complement ZK918. The rpoS gene was further localized to a 3.2-kbEcoRV/KpnI fragment on plasmid pMAKI (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Restriction map of plasmid clones containing theE. amylovora rpoS gene and β-galactosidase activities of the plasmids in the reporter strain ZK918. ZK916 is the parent strain, with an intact chromosomal copy of rpoS.

Nucleotide sequence analysis of the E. amylovora rpoSgene.The nucleotide sequence of the E. amylovora rpoSgene was determined by cycle sequencing (Applied Biosystems). Sequence analysis (1, 8) identified a single open reading frame (ORF) of 990 bp that was 81% homologous to the rpoS genes ofE. coli and Salmonella species. Six bases upstream of the predicted start site is a putative Shine-Dalgarno sequence, AGGAG. The E. amylovora rpoS gene encoded a 330-amino-acid protein, the predicted sequence of which was 97% identical to the RpoS sequences of E. coli andSalmonella species. Fifty bases 5′ to the start site of theE. amylovora rpoS gene is an ORF with 64% identity to theE. coli nlpD gene (20). Further sequence analysis identified an incomplete ORF, 3′ to the E. amylovora rpoSgene, which was 76% identical to E. coli mutS. Therefore, the gene organization of nlpD, rpoS, andmutS would appear to be conserved in both E. amylovora and Erwinia carotovora.

Transcript mapping of the rpoS promoter region.Transcript mapping of the E. amylovora rpoS gene (with the Promega RT primer extension system) identified a single transcriptional start site, within the nlpD gene, 536 bases 5′ of the start of the rpoS coding sequence (Fig.2A). Putative −10 and −35 consensus sequences were identified 5′ of the transcriptional start. In E. coli the transcription start site for rpoS (P2) is also within the nlpD gene and is approximately 21 bp 5′ to that of E. amylovora (18, 32). No additional transcriptional start sites were detected.

Fig. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

(A) Promoter mapping of the E. amylovora rpoSgene. The first four lanes show the nucleotide sequence analysis of the promoter region. Lanes 1 and 2, reverse transcriptase primer extension of RNA from stationary-phase JM101 (pMAKI). The arrow indicates the transcriptional start site. (B) Model of the secondary structure ofrpoS promoter region. The Shine-Dalgarno sequence is indicated in bold. nt, nucleotides.

Analysis of the secondary structure of the region containing therpoS ribosome binding site demonstrated extensive folding (Fig. 2B), which could facilitate formation of a stem structure comparable to that seen in Salmonella typhimurium(3). Though only 66% identity is seen with the intergenic region of S. typhimurium nlpD and rpoS, the nucleotides postulated to be required for formation of the stem structure are conserved. This similarity in folding at the ribosome binding site suggests that the regulation of RpoS expression at the translational level may be comparable to that in other gram-negative bacteria (3, 19).

Characterization of an E. amylovora rpoS mutant.The E. amylovora rpoS gene was mutated by insertional inactivation with a streptomycin resistance cassette. TheEcoRV/PstI fragment from pMAKI was cloned into pRDH20 (9), and the streptomycin cassette from pHP45Ω (38) was ligated into the unique BamHI site in the rpoS gene. The resulting suicide vector, pMA16, was introduced into E. amylovora OT1 by filter mating (6), and the second crossover event was selected by using a sucrose-resistant phenotype. The E. amylovora rpoS mutant was termed OT1.Cm5.

RpoS has been shown to be important for the virulence of a number of animal pathogens. In Salmonella species, rpoSmutants are attenuated for virulence (28, 35) and RpoS protein is required for colonization and destruction of GALT tissue (25), persistence in the liver and spleen (16, 35), and survival in phagocytic cells (5). The ability of OT1.Cm5 to cause disease in the apple seedling assay (23) was determined. The virulence of OT1.Cm5 was not compromised: 61% of the plants developed symptoms compared to 57% of the plants inoculated with OT1 (Fig. 3A). In addition, the times required for the onset of disease symptoms caused by OT1 and OT1.Cm5 were comparable, with necrotic lesions becoming apparent 5 days after inoculation in both cases.

Fig. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Phenotypic analysis of the E. amylovora rpoSmutant. (A) Disease incidence in apple seedlings inoculated with OT1 (solid line) and OT1.Cm5 (dashed line); (B) growth of E. amylovora in apple seedlings; (C) survival of exposure to 25 mM H2O2; (D) survival of exposure to 0.5 M NaCl; (E) survival post-stationary phase. All results are presented as means ± standard errors of the means.

The E. amylovora mutant showed in planta growth characteristics comparable to those of the wild type, with a maximal population of approximately 5 × 106 CFU per plant at day 7 (Fig. 3B). The ability of OT1.Cm5 to grow in planta indicates the absence of nutritional stress. The level of glucose in the apoplast has been estimated at 3 to 6 mM, a level likely to be sufficient to permit bacterial growth (10) and in excess of the 10−4mM glucose concentration thought to induce the onset of stationary phase (26). As such, it is unclear how nutritionally limited the plant environment is to a pathogen and whether expression of the RpoS regulon would be activated. In our model the situation may be complicated by the release of cellular nutrients due to localized tissue damage at the inoculation site.

The entry of a pathogen into plant tissue evokes a defense response in the form of the generation of active oxygen species. Elevated levels of hydrogen peroxide in transgenic plants results in increased disease resistance (37). It has been proposed that for successful induction of disease symptoms plant pathogens require catalase activity to degrade hydrogen peroxide formed in response to infection (8, 17). Bacterial mechanisms for surviving oxidative stress have been well characterized; in E. coli a panel of protective genes, including katE and katG, are induced in an RpoS-dependent manner (4, 22). The ability of OT1.Cm5 to resist oxidative stress was determined. Strains OT1 and OT1.Cm5 were exposed to 25 mM H2O2 and assessed for viability at 30-s intervals over a 2-min period. Strain OT1 retained over 90% viability after 2 min of exposure, whereas OT1.Cm5 was highly sensitive, with no viable bacteria being recovered after as little as 30 s of exposure (Fig. 3C). Given the postulated role of hydrogen peroxide as a plant defense mechanism, it is surprising to find that, though sensitive to oxidative stress, OT1.Cm5 retains virulence. A likely explanation is that when infecting host plants E. amylovora evades recognition and does not trigger defense mechanisms (21), so levels of hydrogen peroxide in plant tissues remain low and the survival of the mutant strain is not compromised.

Although our results do not identify a role for RpoS in induction of disease symptoms in the apple seedling assay, we can readily propose a function for RpoS in the complex E. amylovora disease cycle. The most common route of fireblight infection follows colonization of the stigma and subsequent invasion via the nectaries (36). To colonize these sites, E. amylovora needs to resist the osmotic stress imposed as a consequence of the high sugar concentration in nectar and stigmal secretions (33). In an in vitro assay, OT1.Cm5 was more sensitive to osmotic shock than wild-type E. amylovora. Strain OT1 retained 70 to 80% viability after 2 min of exposure to 0.5 M NaCl, whereas OT1.Cm5 showed a rapid reduction over the first minute and exhibited only 45% survival (Fig. 3D). The sensitivity of OT1.Cm5 to osmotic stress suggests that RpoS may be essential for successful colonization, allowing the organism to survive the osmotic stress encountered during blossom infection.

During systemic infection the host may attempt to limit E. amylovora spread by walling off diseased tissue to form a canker. Cankers act as a reservoir in which E. amylovora overwinters (34). Canker formation may impose a nutritional stress on the infecting bacteria, inducing rpoS expression and promoting survival under the harsh environmental conditions associated with overwintering. To assess the role of rpoS in the starvation survival of E. amylovora, OT1 and OT1.Cm5 were grown to stationary phase and viable counts were determined every 24 h over a 10-day period. During the first 5 days there was a rapid loss of viability of both OT1 and OT1.Cm5 (Fig. 3E). However, after day 5 there was a slight increase in the numbers of viable OT1, with levels remaining constant for the rest of the experiment. In contrast, OT1.Cm5 continued to lose viability, until by day 7 no bacteria were recovered.

To determine whether this starvation sensitivity affects in planta survival of E. amylovora in mature tissue, OT1 and OT1.Cm5 (1,000 CFU/plant) were inoculated into apple bud sticks and incubated at 1°C for 10 weeks. The rpoS mutation had no effect on survival, with similar bacterial populations being recovered from both sets of bud sticks following overwintering (data not shown). In addition, the ability of OT1.Cm5 to replicate in mature tissue and induce water-soaking symptoms following temperature increase (1°C per day up to 25°C) was also unaffected (data not shown). These results suggest that RpoS plays no role in the survival of E. amylovora during overwintering in mature tissue. This result is surprising, since it is known that there is increased expression of RpoS at reduced temperatures during exponential growth, which leads to activation of a subset of RpoS-dependent genes (31). It has been suggested that under low-temperature conditions RpoS may act as a housekeeping sigma factor and that increased expression of members of the RpoS regulon facilitates efficient growth. The mechanisms by whichE. amylovora is able to survive overwintering are currently being investigated in our laboratory.

These results identify an rpoS homologue in the plant pathogen E. amylovora and demonstrate a role for the gene in survival of stationary-phase, oxidative and osmotic stresses. In contrast to the situation seen with a number of animal pathogens, anrpoS mutation does not compromise the in planta growth or virulence of E. amylovora at different stages of the disease cycle. This implies that major differences exist in the natures of the bacterium-host interactions between plant and animal pathogens.

Nucleotide sequence accession number.The GenBank accession number of the nucleotide sequence of the E. amylovora rpoSgene is AJ222716 .

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work is supported by a grant from the Leverhulme Trust to J.A.E. and I.S.R. I.S.R. is a Lister Institute Fellow and gratefully acknowledges the support of The Lister Institute for Preventative Medicine. The work is authorized by the Ministry for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, license no. PHF 1537/1033/44.

We thank M.-A. Barney, P. Loewen, R. Kolter, R. Haigh, and R. Burgess for the generous gifts of strains, plasmids, and antibodies and J. Easton for apple bud sticks.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 24 June 1998.
    • Accepted 9 October 1998.
  • Copyright © 1998 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Altschul F.,
    2. Gish W.,
    3. Miller W.,
    4. Myers E. W.,
    5. Lipman D. J.
    Basic local alignment search tool.J. Mol. Biol.2151990403410
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Barney M. A.,
    2. Guinebretiere M. H.,
    3. Marcais B.,
    4. Coissac E.,
    5. Paulin J. P.,
    6. Laurent J.
    Cloning of a large gene cluster involved in Erwinia amylovora CFBP1430 virulence.Mol. Microbiol.41990777786
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Brown L.,
    2. Elliott T.
    Mutations that increase expression of the rpoS gene and decrease its dependence on hfq function in Salmonella typhimurium.J. Bacteriol.1791997656662
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Calcutt M. J.,
    2. Becker-Hapak M.,
    3. Gaut M.,
    4. Hoerter J.,
    5. Eisenstark A.
    The rpoS gene of Erwinia carotovora: gene organisation and functional expression in E. coli.FEMS Microbiol. Lett.1591998275281
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Chen C.-Y.,
    2. Eckmann L.,
    3. Libby S. J.,
    4. Fang F. C.,
    5. Okamoto S.,
    6. Kagnoff M. F.,
    7. Fierer J.,
    8. Guiney D. G.
    Expression of Salmonella typhimurium rpoS and rpoS-dependent genes in the intracellular environment of eukaryotic cells.Infect. Immun.64199647394743
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Coleman M. J.,
    2. Milner J. S.,
    3. Cooper R. M.,
    4. Roberts I. S.
    The use of TnPhoA in Erwinia amylovora to generate random fusions of alkaline phosphatase to extracytoplasmic proteins.FEMS Microbiol. Lett.801991167172
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. 7.↵
    1. Eden-Green S. J.,
    2. Billing E.
    Fireblight.Rev. Plant Pathol.531974353365
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Gish W.,
    2. States D. J.
    Identification of protein coding regions by database similarity search.Nat. Genet.31993266272
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    Haigh, R. D. (University of Leicester). 1995. Personal communication.
  10. 10.↵
    1. Hancock J. G.,
    2. Huisman O. C.
    Nutrient movement in host-pathogen systems.Annu. Rev. Phytopathol.191981309331
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Heiskanen P.,
    2. Taira S.,
    3. Rhen M.
    Role of rpoS in the regulation of Salmonella plasmid virulence (spv) genes.FEMS Microbiol. Lett.1231994125130
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Heithoff D. M.,
    2. Conner C. P.,
    3. Hanna P. C.,
    4. Julio S. M.,
    5. Hentschel U.,
    6. Mahan M. J.
    Bacterial infection as assessed by in vivo gene expression.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA941997934939
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Iriarte M.,
    2. Stainier I.,
    3. Cornelis G. R.
    The rpoS gene from Yersinia enterocolitica and its influence on expression of virulence factors.Infect. Immun.63199518401847
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.
    1. Kahn A. Q.,
    2. Zhao L.,
    3. Hirose K.,
    4. Miyake M.,
    5. Li T.,
    6. Hashimoto Y.,
    7. Kawamura Y.,
    8. Ezaki T.
    Salmonella typhi rpoS mutant is less cytotoxic than the parent strain but survives inside resting THP-1 macrophages.FEMS Microbiol. Lett.1611998201208
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Kolter R.,
    2. Siegele D. A.,
    3. Tormo A.
    The stationary phase of the bacterial life cycle.Annu. Rev. Microbiol.471993855874
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    1. Kowarz L.,
    2. Coynault C.,
    3. Robbe-Saule V.,
    4. Norel F.
    The Salmonella typhimurium katF (rpoS) gene: cloning, nucleotide sequence, and regulation of spvR and spvABCD virulence plasmid genes.J. Bacteriol.176199468526860
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Laby R. J.,
    2. Beer S. V.,
    3. Bonn W. G.
    Identification of an Erwinia amylovora gene encoding catalase.Acta Hortic.4111995227228
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    1. Lange R.,
    2. Fischer D.,
    3. Hengge-Aronis R.
    Identification of the transcriptional start sites and the role of ppGpp in the expression of rpoS, the structural gene for the ςs subunit of RNA polymerase in Escherichia coli.J. Bacteriol.177199546764680
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Lange R.,
    2. Hengge-Aronis R.
    The cellular concentration of the ςs subunit of RNA polymerase in E. coli is controlled at the levels of transcription, translation and protein stability.Genes Dev.8199416001612
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Lange R.,
    2. Hengge-Aronis R.
    The nlpD gene is located in an operon with rpoS on the Escherichia coli chromosome and encodes a novel lipoprotein with a potential function in cell wall formation.Mol. Microbiol.131994733743
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    1. Mansfield J. W.,
    2. Brown I. R.
    The biology of interactions between plants and bacteria Biology and molecular biology of plant-pathogen interactions. Bailey J. 1986 71 98 Springer-Verlag Berlin, Germany
  22. 22.↵
    1. McCann M. P.,
    2. Kidwell J. P.,
    3. Matin A.
    The putative ς factor KatF has a central role in development of starvation-mediated general resistance in Escherichia coli.J. Bacteriol.173199141884194
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Milner J. S.,
    2. Dymock D.,
    3. Cooper R. M.,
    4. Roberts I. S.
    Penicillin-binding-proteins from Erwinia amylovora: mutants defective in PBP2 are avirulent.J. Bacteriol.175199360826088
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Mulvey M. R.,
    2. Loewen P. C.
    Nucleotide sequence analysis of katF of Escherichia coli suggests KatF protein is a novel transcription factor.Nucleic Acids Res.17198999799990
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. 25.↵
    1. Nickerson C. A.,
    2. Curtiss R. III.
    Role of sigma factor RpoS in initial stages of Salmonella typhimurium infection.Infect. Immun.65199718141823
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Notely L.,
    2. Ferenci T.
    Induction of RpoS-dependent functions in glucose-limited continuous culture: what level of nutrient limitation induces the stationary phase of Escherichia coli? J. Bacteriol. 178 1996 1465 1468
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.
    1. Prentki P.,
    2. Krisch H. M.
    In vitro insertional mutagenesis with a selectable DNA fragment.Gene291984303313
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    1. Robbe-Saule V.,
    2. Coynault C.,
    3. Norel F.
    The live oral typhoid vaccine Ty21a is a rpoS mutant and is susceptible to various environmental stresses.FEMS Microbiol. Lett.1261995171176
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Roberts I. S.,
    2. Coleman M. J.
    The virulence of Erwinia amylovora: molecular genetic perspectives.J. Gen. Microbiol.137199114531457
    OpenUrl
  30. 30.↵
    1. Sambrook J.,
    2. Fritsch E. F.,
    3. Maniatis T.
    Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual 2nd ed. 1989 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y
  31. 31.↵
    1. Sledjeski D. D.,
    2. Gupta A.,
    3. Gottesman S.
    The small RNA, DsrA is essential for the low temperature expression of RpoS during exponential growth in Escherichia coli.EMBO J.15199639934000
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. 32.↵
    1. Takayanagi K.,
    2. Tanaka K.,
    3. Takahashi H.
    Structure of the 5′ upstream region and the regulation of the rpoS gene of Escherichia coli.Mol. Gen. Genet.2431994525531
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. 33.↵
    1. Thomas H. E.,
    2. Ark P. A.
    Nectar and rain in relation to fireblight.Phytopathology241934682685
    OpenUrl
  34. 34.↵
    1. Vanneste J. L.
    Erwinia amylovora Pathogenesis and host specificity in plant diseases Singh U. S., Singh R. P., Kohmoto K. 1. Prokaryotes 1995 21 41 Pergamon Press Oxford, United Kingdom
    OpenUrl
  35. 35.↵
    1. Wilmes-Riesenberg M. R.,
    2. Foster J. W.,
    3. Curtiss R. III.
    An altered rpoS allele contributes to the avirulence of Salmonella typhimurium LT2.Infect. Immun.651997203210
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Wilson M.,
    2. Sigee D. C.,
    3. Epton H. A. S.
    Erwinia amylovora infection of hawthorn blossom. III. The nectary.J. Phytopathol.12819906274
    OpenUrl
  37. 37.↵
    1. Wu G.,
    2. Shortt B. J.,
    3. Lawrence E. B.,
    4. Levine E. B.,
    5. Fitzsimmons K. C.,
    6. Shah D. M.
    Disease resistance conferred by expression of a gene encoding H2O2-generating glucose oxidase in transgenic potato plants.Plant Cell7199513571368
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Identification and Characterization of theErwinia amylovora rpoS Gene: RpoS Is Not Involved in Induction of Fireblight Disease Symptoms
M. Anderson, C. E. Pollitt, I. S. Roberts, J. A. Eastgate
Journal of Bacteriology Dec 1998, 180 (24) 6789-6792; DOI: 10.1128/JB.180.24.6789-6792.1998

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Bacteriology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Identification and Characterization of theErwinia amylovora rpoS Gene: RpoS Is Not Involved in Induction of Fireblight Disease Symptoms
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Bacteriology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Bacteriology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Identification and Characterization of theErwinia amylovora rpoS Gene: RpoS Is Not Involved in Induction of Fireblight Disease Symptoms
M. Anderson, C. E. Pollitt, I. S. Roberts, J. A. Eastgate
Journal of Bacteriology Dec 1998, 180 (24) 6789-6792; DOI: 10.1128/JB.180.24.6789-6792.1998
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Bacterial Proteins
Erwinia
sigma factor

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JB
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #Jbacteriology

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0021-9193; Online ISSN: 1098-5530