Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Bacteriology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
GENETICS AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY

Regulation and Characterization of a Newly Deduced Cell Wall Hydrolase Gene (cwlJ) Which Affects Germination of Bacillus subtilis Spores

Shu Ishikawa, Kunio Yamane, Junichi Sekiguchi
Shu Ishikawa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kunio Yamane
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Junichi Sekiguchi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The predicted amino acid sequence of Bacillus subtilis ycbQ (renamed cwlJ) exhibits high similarity to those of the deduced C-terminal catalytic domain of SleBs, the specific cortex-hydrolyzing enzyme of B. cereus and the deduced one of B. subtilis. We constructed acwlJ::lacZ fusion in the B. subtilischromosome. The β-galactosidase activity and results of Northern hybridization and primer extension analyses of the cwlJgene indicated that it is transcribed by EςE RNA polymerase. cwlJ-deficient spores responded to bothl-alanine and AGFK, the A 580 values of spore suspensions decreased more slowly than in the case of the wild-type strain, and the mutant spores released less dipicolinic acid than did those of the wild-type strain during germination. However, the mutant spores released only slightly less hexosamine than did the wild-type spores. In contrast, B. subtilis sleB spores did not release hexosamine at a significant level. While cwlJand sleB spores were able to germinate, CJSB (cwlJ sleB) spores could not germinate but exhibited initial germination reactions, e.g., partial decrease inA 580 and slow release of dipicolinic acid. CJSB spores became slightly gray after 6 h in the germinant, but their refractility was much greater than that of sleB mutant spores. The roles of the sleB and cwlJmutations in germination and spore maturation are also discussed.

During sporulation and germination of Bacillus subtilis, the action of autolysins is assumed to be required for asymmetric septum peptidoglycan hydrolysis, engulfment, cortex maturation, mother cell lysis, and cortex hydrolysis during germination (28, 33). Mother cell lysis depends on the compensatory effect of cell wall hydrolases CwlB (LytC) and CwlC (11, 13, 34). For cortex maturation, a defect in thecwlD gene leads to a lack of germination and blocking of the formation of muramic acid lactam structure in the cortex (2, 26,31). Recently, Makino and colleagues reported that the B. cereus sleB gene encodes a 24-kDa mature germination-specificN-acetylmuramoyl-l-alanine amidase which degrades decoated spores from various organisms (18, 22).B. subtilis sleB is homologous to B. cereus sleB, and B. subtilis sleB mutant spores are able to germinate and form colonies. However, B. subtilis SleB showed no activity against degraded decoated spores or other substrates (21).

Our work on the B. subtilis genome sequencing project has revealed the ycbQ gene, which is homologous with the cortex-hydrolyzing sleB genes (22, 25). In this study, we describe the regulation and function of the cwlJ(ycbQ) gene and the compensatory effect of the CwlJ andB. subtilis SleB proteins on germination.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains and plasmids.The strains of B. subtilis and Escherichia coli and the plasmids used in this study are described in Table 1.B. subtilis was grown on nutrient agar medium (Difco) at 30°C for about 10 h, then inoculated into DSM (Schaeffer medium) (30), and shaken at 37°C. If necessary, erythromycin and spectinomycin were added to the medium to final concentrations of 0.3 and 50 μg/ml, respectively. E. coli was grown in LB medium (29) at 37°C. If necessary, ampicillin was added to a final concentration of 50 or 100 μg/ml.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study

Plasmid construction.To construct a B. subtilis cwlJ mutant, an internal fragment of the cwlJ gene was amplified by PCR using two primers, forward primer cbQHF (5′-GCCGAAGCTT G 10 TGAGAGCAACGAGTGC 26; the internal sequence of the cwlJ region is italicized, numbering is with respect to the first A of the translational start codon of cwlJ, and theHindIII site is underlined) and reverse primer cbQBR (5′-GCGCGGATCC T 212 ATCCATGAGTCACAGCC 195; the sequence complementary to the internal region ofcwlJ is italicized, and the BamHI site is underlined), with B. subtilis 168 DNA as a template. The PCR fragment was digested with HindIII and BamHI. To remove an extra cloning site region, pGEM-3zf(+) was digested withEcoRI and SmaI, blunt ended with mung bean nuclease, and then self-ligated. The resulting plasmid, pGEMΔES, and pMUTin2 were digested with HindIII and BamHI and then ligated to the digested PCR fragment, followed by transformation of E. coli JM109. The resulting plasmid, pGEMcJ, was used to synthesize an RNA probe, and pMUTin2cJ was used for the transformation of E. coli C600 to produce concatemeric DNAs (3).

To construct a B. subtilis sleB mutant, the entiresleB region was amplified by PCR using two primers, forward primer soPF (5′-GCCGCTGCAG C −165 GTTCCGTTAATATGATGC −147; the upstream sequence of the sleB gene is italicized, numbering is with respect to the first A of the translational start codon ofsleB, and the PstI site is underlined) and reverse primer soER (5′-GCGCGAATTC C 2383 GCATTCAATATACTCACG 2365; the sequence complementary to the internal region ofsleB is italicized, and the EcoRI site is underlined), with B. subtilis 168 DNA as a template. The PCR fragment was digested with PstI andEcoRI, followed by ligation into the corresponding sites of pUC118. The resultant plasmid, pUCSO, was digested withHincII and SmaI and then ligated into theHincII-StuI fragment of the spectinomycin resistance (Spr) cassette plasmid pDG1727 (7). The resultant plasmid, pUCSOSP, was used to construct a B. subtilis sleB mutant.

Mutant construction.A cwlJ-deficient mutant, cbQ, was constructed by transformation of B. subtilis 168 with pMUTin2cJ. Disruption of the cwlJ gene by means of Campbell-type recombination was confirmed by PCR. Thus, the cbQ mutant was a cwlJ-lacZ transcriptional fusion strain.sleB and sleB cwlJ mutants 168SB and CJSB, respectively, were constructed by transformation of B. subtilis with ScaI-digested pUCSOSP DNA. The double-crossover recombination event was confirmed by PCR using primers soPF and soER.

Transformation of E. coli and B. subtilis. E. coli transformation was performed as described by Sambrook et al. (29), and B. subtilistransformation was performed by the competent cell method (1).

Spore germination. B. subtilis 168, cbQ, 168SB, and CJSB were cultured in DSM for 2 days at 37°C. Spores were suspended in deionized water and then washed by centrifugation as described by Nicholson and Setlow (23) until all cell debris and vegetative cells had been removed. The spores were heat activated at 80°C for 20 min, unless otherwise noted, and then diluted with a 10 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.4). Germination was initiated by the addition of l-alanine to 10 mM or AGFK (l-asparagine,d-glucose, d-fructose, KCl) to 10 mM each ingredient. At appropriate times, the A 580 of the mixture was measured and an 11-ml sample was taken and centrifuged in a microcentrifuge. The supernatant (1 ml) was used for the measurement of released dipicolinic acid as described by Nicholson and Setlow (23). The rest of the supernatant was dried with a concentrator (model CC-180; TOMY), followed by measurement of the released reducing groups by a modification (35) of the method of Park and Johnson, with N-acetylglucosamine as a standard. Dipicolinic acid in sporulating cells was determined by the method of Jannsen et al. as described by Nicholson and Setlow (23).

β-Galactosidase assay.The β-galactosidase assay was performed basically as described by Shimotsu and Henner (32). One unit of β-galactosidase activity was defined as the amount of enzyme necessary to release 1 nmol of 2-nitrophenol from 2-nitrophenyl-β-d-galactopyranoside in 1 min.

Northern blot and primer extension analyses.Cells (15 units of optical density at 600 nm) cultured in DSM were harvested and then suspended in 1 ml of chilled killing buffer (36). After centrifugation at 12,000 × g for 1 min at 4°C, the pellet was suspended in 1 ml of SET buffer containing lysozyme (final concentration, 6 mg/ml). After incubation for 10 min at 0°C, the suspension was centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 1 min at 4°C. The pellet was used for RNA preparation with Isogen (Nippon Gene) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Agarose-formaldehyde gel electrophoresis was performed as described by Sambrook et al. (29). The transfer of RNAs onto a nylon membrane (Magnagraph, Micron Separations) was performed with a vacuum blotter (model BE-600; BIOCRAFT). The DNA fragment used for preparing an RNA probe was amplified by PCR with M13(−21) and M13RV (Takara) as primers and with pGEMcJ DNA, containing the internal region ofcwlJ, as a template. The amplified fragment was digested with HindIII, and then fragments were purified by phenol and chloroform treatment, followed by precipitation with ethanol. The RNA probe was prepared with a DIG RNA labeling kit (Boehringer Mannheim), and Northern (RNA) hybridization was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Primer extension analysis was performed as described previously (31), using primer PEXcbQ (5′-G44CCATCAAATCGACATCC27; 5′ and 3′ ends correspond to the complementary nucleotides at positions 44 and 27 with respect to the 5′ end of the cwlJ gene).

RESULTS

The B. subtilis genome project has revealed the existence of many cell wall hydrolase homologs, one of which is the product of the ycbQ gene located at 24° on the B. subtilis chromosome map. The amino acid sequence of YcbQ (renamed CwlJ) exhibits 28 and 30% identity with those of the deduced catalytic domains of B. cereus SleB and B. subtilis SleB (Fig. 1). The SleB proteins contain signal sequences and direct repeated sequences in their N-terminal regions, but CwlJ lacks both signal and repeated sequences.

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Alignment of the deduced amino acid sequences ofB. subtilis CwlJ (Bs-CwlJ; YcbQ) (25), B. subtilis (Bs-SleB; deduced B. subtiliscortex-hydrolyzing amidase) (22), and B. cereusSleB (Bc-SleB; B. cereus cortex-hydrolyzing amidase) (21). Amino acid identities are indicated by shading, and amino acids identical in the three proteins are indicated by asterisks. Amino acids are numbered from the N termini of the proteins, and dashes indicate the introduction of gaps in the alignment. The arrowhead and arrows indicate a signal sequence cleavage site and repeated sequences, respectively. The nucleotide sequence G256GC258(numbering with respect to the first A of the translational start codon of cwlJ) under GSDB, EMBL, DDBJ, and NCBI accession no.D30808 should be corrected to CGG; thus, the corresponding amino acid, G86 (numbered with respect to the N-terminal amino acid) should be corrected to R.

Expression of the cwlJ gene.ThecwlJ-lacZ fusion strain, cbQ, was cultured in DSM, and β-galactosidase activity was determined. The activity was first detected after t 2 (2 h after the onset of sporulation) and was maximal at around t 7 (Fig.2A), which indicates that thecwlJ expression is regulated by a sporulation-specific sigma factor. RNAs from four sigma factor-deficient strains, 1S86 (SigF−), 1S60 (SigE−), SpoIIIGΔ1 (SigG−), and 1S38 (SigK−), were analyzed by Northern blotting using an RNA probe containing the internal region of the cwlJ gene. Hybridizing bands for the 168, SigG−, and SigK− RNAs were detected at 0.47 kb, but no band was observed for the SigF− and SigE− RNAs (Fig. 2B). The cwlJ gene consists of 426 nucleotide residues followed by a deduced rho-independent terminator (ΔG = −21.6 kcal/mol) (Fig.3) (25). Therefore, these results indicate that the cwlJ gene is transcribed by EςE RNA polymerase as a monocistronic mRNA. To determine the promoter region, primer extension analysis was performed with 168, SigF−, SigE−, SigG−, and SigK− RNAs along with primer PEXcbQ. Extended products were found at t 4.5 and/ort 7.5 for 168, SigG−, and SigK− RNAs, but no products were observed att 4.5 for the SigF− and SigE− RNAs (Fig. 3A). The products started at A, G, and A (residues 23, 22, and 21 bp upstream, respectively, of the translational start codon) (Fig. 3). The upstream sequences TCATcAc and aATAtgAT (capital letters denote consensus sequence), with their spacing of 14 bp, were very similar to the −35 and −10 consensus sequences of ςE-dependent promoters ([T/G][A/C]ATA[A/T][A/T] and CATACA(A/C)T, respectively, with a spacing of 14 bp) (8).

Fig. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Time course of the production of thecwlJ-lacZ fusion protein (A) and Northern blot analysis of the cwlJ region (B). (A) cwlJ-directed β-galactosidase activity of strain cbQ was determined at the indicated times after the onset of sporulation. Squares, cell growth at an optical density of 600 nm (OD600); diamonds, β-galactosidase activity. (B) Northern hybridization performed with the cwlJ-specific RNA probe as described in Materials and Methods. The lanes contained 5 μg of RNA from B. subtilis168 at t −2 (−2), t 0(0), t 2 (2), or t 4 (4), and B. subtilis 1S86 (SigF−), 1S60 (SigE−), SpoIIIGΔ1 (SigG−), and 1S38 (SigK−) at t 1.5 (1.5),t 3 (3), t 4.5 (4.5), ort 6 (6). 0.47 indicates the size (in kilobases) of the hybridizing RNA in comparison with the migration of 23S and 16S RNAs.

Fig. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Determination of the transcriptional start sites by primer extension analysis (A) and nucleotide sequence of the upstream region of cwlJ (B). (A) RNA (5 μg) from B. subtilis 168 at t 1.5 (lane 1),t 4.5 (lane 2), or t 7.5(lane 3), 1S86 (SigF−) at t 4.5(lane 4), 1S60 (SigE−) at t 4.5(lane 5), SpoIIIGΔ1 (SigG−) att 4.5 (lane 6), or 1S38 (SigK−) att 4.5 (lane 7) or t 7.5(lane 8) was hybridized with a labeled cbQPEX1 primer, which is complementary to nucleotides 27 to 44 in the sequence in panel B. The primer-extended products obtained with reverse transcriptase were subjected to electrophoresis in 12% (wt/vol) polyacrylamide sequencing gels, followed by autoradiography with an imaging plate (BAS-MP; Fuji). The dideoxy-DNA sequencing reaction mixtures with the cbQPEX1 primer were electrophoresed in parallel (lanes G, A, T, and C). The positions of the products are indicated by arrowheads. The boxed area indicates the −10 region of the ςE promoter. In panel B, the promoter regions (−35 and −10) of ςE and the transcriptional start position are indicated by underlines and arrowheads, respectively. The deduced rho-independent terminator is indicated by opposing arrows.

Construction and characterization of cwlJ,sleB, and cwlJ sleB disruptants.cbQ (cwlJ), 168SB (sleB), and CJSB (cwlJ sleB) disruptants were constructed as described in Materials and Methods. The cbQ strain showed normal cell growth, cell separation, and motility and produced highly refractile spores. A previous report indicated that B. subtilis sleB-deficient spores did not complete darkening and released less dipicolinic acid during germination but still produced viable colonies after germination (21). Since CwlJ exhibits high amino acid sequence similarity with the C-terminal region of B. subtilis SleB (Fig. 1), germination was compared among 168, cbQ, 168SB, and CJSB spores. During germination in l-alanine-containing buffer, the 168SB spores showed a smaller decrease inA 580 than the wild-type 168 spores. The decrease in absorbance of cbQ spores exhibited a different pattern: there were large differences between cbQ spores and 168 and 168SB spores 30 min after the onset of germination. Levels of release of dipicolinic acid by these three strains during spore germination were also different, as 168SB and cbQ spores released dipicolinic acid in slightly lower and much lower amounts, respectively, than did 168 spores. CJSB spores exhibited only a 25% reduction in A 580 at 6 h after germination and a slower decrease in absorbance at 30 min after the onset of germination. CJSB spores released dipicolinic acid more slowly than the cbQ spores (Fig.4). The cbQ spores released only slightly less hexosamine than those of the wild type, but the 168SB and CJSB spores did not release significant amounts of hexosamine. These results suggest that SleB is a major germination-specific cortex hydrolase and CwlJ is a minor one. The absorbance profiles of the spores in AGFK as a germinant were very similar to those in l-alanine as a germinant (9). Therefore, these effects were common to these germination pathways.

Fig. 4.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Spore germination of B. subtilis 168, cbQ (cwlJ), 168SB (sleB), and CJSB (cwlJ sleB). The germination of spores of the B. subtilisstrains was monitored at A 580 at the indicated times after the addition of l-alanine and is expressed as relative absorbance. The released dipicolinic acid and reducing groups in the supernatants of the spore suspensions were also measured. Squares, diamonds, circles, and triangles indicate B. subtilis 168, cbQ, 168SB, and CJSB, respectively.

Germination frequencies and microscopic observation of the mutant spores.Table 2 shows the germination frequencies of the mutant spores with or without heat activation at 80°C for 20 min. These results indicate that the cbQ and 168SB spores are similar with respect to heat resistance and viability to spores of 168 under the conditions used. Spores of strain CJSB did not produce colonies on LB agar even without heat activation. Thus, this defect was not caused by heat sensitivity of the CJSB spores. Phase-contrast microscopy of the wild-type and mutant spores is shown in Fig. 5. Dormant spores of the mutants and the wild type were bright, and it was difficult to observe a difference in refractility. The refractility of cbQ spores changed from bright to dark after 6 h under the germination conditions, whereas 168SB spores became dark gray and CJSB spores became weakly bright under the same conditions. These phenomena show good agreement with the germination frequencies (Table 2). Therefore, these results indicate that both CwlJ and SleB are necessary for normal germination behavior of B. subtilis spores.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Germination frequencies of the cwlJ andcwlJ sleB mutants

Fig. 5.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

Phase-contrast microscopy of B. subtilis 168, cbQ, 168SB, and CJSB spores treated with l-alanine. Spores were germinated at 37°C for 6 h as described for Fig. 4, with the addition of germination buffer (10 mM l-alanine, 10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.4]), and then observed by phase-contrast microscopy. Bar, 5 μm.

DISCUSSION

B. cereus SleB was extracted from dormant spores, and the protein, which had been processed by signal peptidase, was active against the decoated spores of various bacilli (18, 22). However, the gene product of B. subtilis sleB, which had been cloned by colony hybridization with the B. cereus sleBfragment as a probe, was not detected in the germination exudate of theB. subtilis spores (21). B. subtilisCwlJ did not contain a signal sequence or direct repeated sequences in its N-terminal region (Fig. 1). Since the cwlJ gene was transcribed by EςE RNA polymerase (Fig. 3), expression ofcwlJ is mother cell specific, and a signal sequence may not be necessary for CwlJ to localize in the spore cortex. Direct repeated sequences have been found in the noncatalytic domains of many cell wall hydrolases (e.g., CwlA, CwlB [LytC], CwlC, LytD [CwlG], and XlyA from B. subtilis [11-13, 15, 17, 19, 27] and CwlL, CwlM, and CwlX from B. licheniformis and a cell wall hydrolase from Bacillus species [14, 16,24]). In the case of CwlM, the noncatalytic domain containing direct repeats was related to the substrate specificity (14). In the case of the major autolysin, CwlB, the truncated protein comprising only the noncatalytic domain, bound tightly to cell walls (12). Therefore, CwlJ, lacking the noncatalytic domain, may have a wide substrate specificity and/or bind weakly to the B. subtilis cortex.

In Clostridium perfringens, two cortex-hydrolyzing enzymes (spore cortex lytic amidase SleC and cortical fragment-lytic muramidase SleM) play roles in cortex hydrolysis during spore germination (4,20). Foster and Johnstone proposed a germination mechanism forB. megaterium (6), and Foster recently proposed a germination mechanism in B. subtilis in which three types of enzymes with different substrate specificities (amidase, endopeptidase, and transglycosylase) were required for cortex hydrolysis during germination in that order (5). Since thesleB-deficient mutant 168SB did not show significant hexosamine release during germination, SleB plays a major role in cortex hydrolysis during germination. Therefore, SleB probably corresponds to the amidase proposed by Foster. However, the 168SB spores did form colonies on LB agar plates. Therefore, there should be another lytic enzyme (probably an amidase) that plays a role in cortex hydrolysis at the early stage of germination. CwlJ is such a candidate, because spores of the cwlJ-deficient mutant cbQ exhibited a slow decrease in the A 580 by 30 min after the onset of germination, and its dipicolinic acid release rate was lower than that of 168SB; cbQ also released slightly less hexosamine than did the wild-type 168 (Fig. 4). Moreover, the combination of these two proteins was essential for normal spore germination, because thecwlJ sleB double-mutant (CJSB) spores did not form colonies on LB agar plates (Table 2) and showed a change in refractility from only bright to faint gray (Fig. 5).

Obviously CwlJ plays a different role from SleB in spore germination. In addition to the foregoing results, the initial response of germination was severely affected by the cwlJ sleB double mutation, there being a smaller decrease in theA 580 value. The absorbance curve seems to be the combined pattern of the single mutations (Fig. 4). Therefore, CwlJ may be a minor cortex-lytic enzyme during germination. But another possibility, that CwlJ is a cortex maturation enzyme, cannot be eliminated at this stage. Previously, spores of thecwlD-deficient mutant ADD1, which lacks muramic acid lactam-forming activity, were found not to germinate (2, 26,31). However, the cbQ spores germinated at the normal level (Table 2). Therefore, the latter possibility presupposes the presence of a new cortex hydrolase that acts at the early stage of germination and is unable to digest the cortex of cbQ spores.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 14 November 1997.
    • Accepted 3 January 1998.
  • ↵* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Applied Biology, Faculty of Textile Science and Technology, Shinshu University, 3-15-1 Tokida, Ueda-shi, Nagano 386, Japan. Phone: 81-268-21-5344. Fax: 81-268-21-5331. E-mail:jsekigu{at}giptc.shinshu-u.ac.jp.

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Anagnostopoulos C.,
    2. Spizizen J.
    (1961) Requirements for transformation in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 81:741–746.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Atrih A.,
    2. Zöllner P.,
    3. Allmaier G.,
    4. Foster S. J.
    (1996) Structural analysis of Bacillus subtilis 168 endospore peptidoglycan and its role during differentiation. J. Bacteriol. 178:6173–6183.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Canosi U.,
    2. Morelli G.,
    3. Trautner T. A.
    (1978) The relationship between molecular structure and transformation efficiency of some S. aureus plasmids isolated from B. subtilis. Mol. Gen. Genet. 166:259–267.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    1. Chen Y.,
    2. Miyata S.,
    3. Makino S.,
    4. Moriyama R.
    (1997) Molecular characterization of a germination-specific muramidase from Clostridium perfringens S40 spores and nucleotide sequence of the corresponding gene. J. Bacteriol. 179:3181–3187.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Foster S. J.
    (1997) The role of cortex hydrolysis during spore germination. Abstracts of the 9th International Conference on Bacilli. (Universite de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland), p 42.
  6. ↵
    1. Foster S. J.,
    2. Johnstone K.
    (1990) Pulling the trigger: the mechanism of bacterial spore germination. Mol. Microbiol. 4:137–141.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    1. Guerout-Fleury A. M.,
    2. Shazand K.,
    3. Frandsen N.,
    4. Stragier P.
    (1995) Antibiotic-resistance cassettes for Bacillus subtilis. Gene 167:335–336.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. ↵
    1. Haldenwang W. G.
    (1995) The sigma factors of Bacillus subtilis. Microbiol. Rev. 59:1–30.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Ishikawa, S., and J. Sekiguchi. Unpublished data.
    1. Karmazyn-Campelli C.,
    2. Bonamy C.,
    3. Savelli B.,
    4. Stragier P.
    (1989) Tandem genes encoding ς-factors for consecutive steps of development in Bacillus subtilis. Genes Dev. 3:150–157.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Kuroda A.,
    2. Asami Y.,
    3. Sekiguchi J.
    (1993) Molecular cloning of a sporulation-specific cell wall hydrolase gene of Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 175:6260–6268.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Kuroda A.,
    2. Sekiguchi J.
    (1990) Cloning, sequencing and genetic mapping of a Bacillus subtilis cell wall hydrolase gene. J. Gen. Microbiol. 136:2209–2216.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Kuroda A.,
    2. Sekiguchi J.
    (1991) Molecular cloning and sequencing of a major Bacillus subtilis autolysin gene. J. Bacteriol. 173:7304–7312.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Kuroda A.,
    2. Sugimoto Y.,
    3. Funahashi T.,
    4. Sekiguchi J.
    (1992) Genetic structure, isolation and characterization of a Bacillus licheniformis cell wall hydrolase. Mol. Gen. Genet. 234:129–137.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Lazarevic V.,
    2. Margot P.,
    3. Soldo B.,
    4. Karamata D.
    (1992) Sequencing and analysis of the Bacillus subtilis lytRABC divergon: a regulatory unit encompassing the structural genes of the N-acetylmuramoyl-l-alanine amidase and its modifier. J. Gen. Microbiol. 138:1949–1961.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Lee J. K.,
    2. Edwards C. W.,
    3. Hulett F. M.
    (1991) Identification of four unique clones encoding 10 kDa proteins from Bacillus that cause phenotypic complementation of a phoA mutant strain of Escherichia coli. J. Gen. Microbiol. 137:667–677.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Longchamp P. F.,
    2. Mauël C.,
    3. Karamata D.
    (1994) Lytic enzymes associated with defective prophages of Bacillus subtilis: sequencing and characterization of the region comprising the N-acetylmuramoyl-l-alanine amidase gene of prophage PBSX. Microbiology 140:1855–1867.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Makino S.,
    2. Ito N.,
    3. Inoue T.,
    4. Miyata S.,
    5. Moriyama R.
    (1994) A spore-lytic enzyme released from Bacillus cereus spores during germination. Microbiology 140:1403–1410.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Margot P.,
    2. Mauël C.,
    3. Karamata D.
    (1994) The gene of the N-acetylglucosaminidase, a Bacillus subtilis cell wall hydrolase not involved in vegetative cell autolysis. Mol. Microbiol. 12:535–545.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  19. ↵
    1. Miyata S.,
    2. Moriyama R.,
    3. Miyahara N.,
    4. Makino S.
    (1995) A gene (sleC) encoding a spore-cortex-lytic enzyme from Clostridium perfringens S40 spores; cloning, sequence analysis and molecular characterization. Microbiology 141:2643–2650.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Moriyama R.,
    2. Hattori A.,
    3. Miyata S.,
    4. Kudoh S.,
    5. Makino S.
    (1996) A gene (sleB) encoding a spore cortex-lytic enzyme from Bacillus subtilis and response of the enzyme to l-alanine-mediated germination. J. Bacteriol. 178:6059–6063.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Moriyama R.,
    2. Kudoh S.,
    3. Miyata S.,
    4. Nonobe S.,
    5. Hattori A.,
    6. Makino S.
    (1996) A germination-specific spore cortex-lytic enzyme from Bacillus cereus spores: cloning and sequencing of the gene and molecular characterization of the enzyme. J. Bacteriol. 178:5330–5332.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Harwood C. R.,
    2. Cutting S. M.
    1. Nicholson W. L.,
    2. Setlow P.
    (1990) Sporulation, germination and outgrowth. in Molecular biological methods for Bacillus. eds Harwood C. R., Cutting S. M. (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Chichester, United Kingdom), pp 391–450.
  23. ↵
    1. Oda Y.,
    2. Nakayama R.,
    3. Kuroda A.,
    4. Sekiguchi J.
    (1993) Molecular cloning, sequence analysis, and characterization of a new cell wall hydrolase, CwlL, of Bacillus licheniformis. Mol. Gen. Genet. 241:380–388.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Ogawa K.,
    2. Akagawa E.,
    3. Nakamura K.,
    4. Yamane K.
    (1995) Determination of a 21548 bp nucleotide sequence around the 24° region of the Bacillus subtilis chromosome. Microbiology 141:269–275.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Popham D. L.,
    2. Helin J.,
    3. Costello C. E.,
    4. Setlow P.
    (1996) Muramic lactam in peptidoglycan of B. subtilis spores is required for spore outgrowth but not for spore dehydration or heat resistance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:15405–15410.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Rashid M. H.,
    2. Mori M.,
    3. Sekiguchi J.
    (1995) Glucosaminidase of Bacillus subtilis: cloning, regulation, primary structure and biochemical characterization. Microbiology 141:2391–2404.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Rogers H. J.,
    2. Perkins H. R.,
    3. Ward J. B.
    (1980) Microbial cell walls and membranes. (Chapman and Hall, London, United Kingdom).
  28. ↵
    1. Sambrook J.,
    2. Fritsch E. F.,
    3. Maniatis T.
    (1989) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y), 2nd ed.
  29. ↵
    1. Schaeffer P.,
    2. Millet J.,
    3. Aubert J. P.
    (1965) Catabolite repression of bacterial sporulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 54:704–711.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Sekiguchi J.,
    2. Akeo K.,
    3. Yamamoto H.,
    4. Khasanov F. K.,
    5. Alonso J. C.,
    6. Kuroda A.
    (1995) Nucleotide sequence and regulation of a new putative cell wall hydrolase gene, cwlD, which affects germination in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 177:5582–5589.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Shimotsu H.,
    2. Henner D. J.
    (1986) Modulation in Bacillus subtilis levansucrase gene expression by sucrose, and regulation of the steady-state mRNA level by sacU and sacQ genes. J. Bacteriol. 168:380–388.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Ghuysen J.-M.,
    2. Hakenbeck R.
    1. Shockman G. D.,
    2. Höltje J.-V.
    (1994) Microbial peptidoglycan (murein) hydrolases. in Bacterial cell wall. eds Ghuysen J.-M., Hakenbeck R. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands), pp 131–166.
  33. ↵
    1. Smith T. J.,
    2. Foster S. J.
    (1995) Characterization of the involvement of two compensatory autolysins in mother cell lysis during sporulation of Bacillus subtilis 168. J. Bacteriol. 177:3855–3862.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Thompson J. S.,
    2. Shockman G. D.
    (1968) A modification of the Park and Johnson reducing sugar determination suitable for the assay of insoluble materials: its application to bacterial cell walls. Anal. Biochem. 22:260–268.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Völker U.,
    2. Engelmann S.,
    3. Maul B.,
    4. Riethdorf S.,
    5. Völker A.,
    6. Schmid R.,
    7. Mach H.,
    8. Hecker M.
    (1994) Analysis of the induction of general stress proteins of Bacillus subtilis. Microbiology 140:741–752.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  • Copyright © 1998 American Society for Microbiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Regulation and Characterization of a Newly Deduced Cell Wall Hydrolase Gene (cwlJ) Which Affects Germination of Bacillus subtilis Spores
Shu Ishikawa, Kunio Yamane, Junichi Sekiguchi
Journal of Bacteriology Mar 1998, 180 (6) 1375-1380; DOI:

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Bacteriology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Regulation and Characterization of a Newly Deduced Cell Wall Hydrolase Gene (cwlJ) Which Affects Germination of Bacillus subtilis Spores
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Bacteriology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Bacteriology.
Share
Regulation and Characterization of a Newly Deduced Cell Wall Hydrolase Gene (cwlJ) Which Affects Germination of Bacillus subtilis Spores
Shu Ishikawa, Kunio Yamane, Junichi Sekiguchi
Journal of Bacteriology Mar 1998, 180 (6) 1375-1380; DOI:
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JB
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #Jbacteriology

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

Copyright © 2019 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0021-9193; Online ISSN: 1098-5530