Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Bacteriology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
PLASMIDS AND TRANSPOSONS

Multiple Roles for TnpI Recombinase in Regulation of Tn5401 Transposition in Bacillus thuringiensis

James A. Baum, Amy Jelen Gilmer, Anne-Marie Light Mettus
James A. Baum
Ecogen Inc., Langhorne, Pennsylvania 19047-3023
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amy Jelen Gilmer
Ecogen Inc., Langhorne, Pennsylvania 19047-3023
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anne-Marie Light Mettus
Ecogen Inc., Langhorne, Pennsylvania 19047-3023
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JB.181.20.6271-6277.1999
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Tn5401 is a class II transposable element derived from the gram-positive bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis. The 4,837-bp transposon encodes a Tn3-like transposase (TnpA) and an integrase-like recombinase (TnpI) and is notable for its unusually long 53-bp terminal inverted repeats (TIRs). ThetnpA and tnpI genes are transcribed from a common promoter, designated PR, that is subject to negative regulation by TnpI. The TIRs of Tn5401 each contain a 38-bp sequence that can be aligned with the 38- to 40-bp TIR sequences of Tn3-like transposons and an adjacent 12-bp sequence that binds TnpI. This unique juxtaposition of TnpA and TnpI binding sites suggests that TnpI may regulate the binding or catalytic activity of TnpA. The results of the present study indicate that TnpI, in addition to functioning as a site-specific recombinase and as a transcriptional repressor, is required for TnpA binding to the TIRs of Tn5401.

The transposition of mobile genetic elements requires specific interactions between an element-encoded protein, the transposase, and DNA sequences located at the termini of the element. The expression of the transposase and therefore transposition itself are precisely regulated. In some instances, the transposition reaction is affected by other proteins, including those encoded by the host cell (14).

Class II (Tn3-like) transposable elements, or transposons (13), exhibit replicative transposition: a two-step process that requires both a transposase and a site-specific recombinase. These transposons are also characterized by the presence of terminal inverted repeats (TIRs) that typically range in length from 38 to 40 bp (19). Transposition is initiated by the specific binding of the transposase to the TIRs, the generation of staggered nicks at the target site, and the formation of a cointegrate intermediate containing two copies of the transposon oriented in the same direction. Resolution of the cointegrate intermediate is catalyzed at a specific site by the transposon-encoded recombinase/resolvase. The site of cointegrate resolution, referred to as the internal resolution site (IRS), includes a recombinase binding site exhibiting dyad symmetry (19).

Tn5401 is a 4,837-bp Tn3-like transposable element derived from the gram-positive Bacillus thuringiensis strain EG2158 (7) and is characterized by the presence of 53-bp TIRs (3). The tnpI andtnpA genes of Tn5401, encoding the TnpI recombinase and TnpA transposase proteins, respectively, appear to be transcribed as an operon from a single promoter, designated PR. The structural organization of Tn5401 (Fig.1A) resembles that of B. thuringiensis transposon Tn4430, but the sequences of the two transposons are highly divergent (3, 15).

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Structural organization of Tn5401 (A) and nucleotide sequences of the tnpI-tnpA promoter region (B) and Tn5401 TIRs (C). Nucleotide positions in the promoter region are based on the published sequence of Tn5401(3). The conserved 12-bp TnpI recognition sequence ATGTCCRCTAAY is indicated by the arrows in panels B and C. The terminal 38-bp sequence with homology to Tn3-like transposons is shown in panel C. The −35 and −10 regions of the tnpI-tnpA(PR) promoter (single underline) and the divergentorf1 (PL) promoter (double underline) are shown, along with the corresponding transcriptional start sites (∗). Ribosome binding sites are in boldface.

The TnpA transposase and TIRs of Tn5401 show significant sequence similarity to those of Tn3 (3). In contrast, the TnpI recombinase of Tn5401, like that of Tn4430, is related to the phage integrase family of site-specific recombinases and is not related to the Tn3family of resolvases (1, 3, 15). In this respect, both Tn5401 and Tn4430 are unique among Tn3-like transposable elements. The IRS region of Tn5401 has been localized to a 111-bp region 5′ to thetnpI gene (4). The TnpI recombinase of Tn5401 has been shown to bind to four copies of a conserved 12-bp sequence element (ATGTCCRCTAAY) located within this IRS region (Fig. 1B, elements a to d), including two that comprise a dyad. Deletion of even one of these elements abolishes TnpI-mediated recombination in vivo. This loss of site-specific recombination is correlated with reduced TnpI binding in gel mobility shift assays (4).

Transcription of tnpI and tnpA appears to be repressed by TnpI. Disruption of tnpI, but nottnpA, increased the level of mRNA transcripts originating from PR and the divergent promoter PL(3). Direct repeats of the 12-bp TnpI recognition sequence are positioned adjacent to the −10 and −35 regions of the promoter, PR, that directs the transcription of tnpI andtnpA (Fig. 1B). Thus, TnpI binding to this region may prevent transcription from PR, perhaps by denying RNA polymerase access to the promoter.

Interestingly, DNAse I footprinting experiments (4) demonstrated that TnpI also binds to a copy of its 12-bp recognition sequence located within the 53-bp TIRs of Tn5401 (Fig. 1C). The adjacent and outermost 38-bp sequences of the TIRs are similar to the 38- to 40-bp TIRs of other Tn3-like transposons which each contain the site for transposase binding. This unique juxtaposition of TnpI and TnpA binding sites, in effect generating an unusually long TIR sequence, suggests that TnpI may itself regulate the activity of TnpA.

In this paper, we confirm that TnpI serves as a negative regulator oftnpA expression and show that the TnpI protein is required for the binding of TnpA to the TIRs of Tn5401. In addition, the effects of tnpI and tnpA mutations on Tn5401 transposition activity were assessed by using a coupled transposition-conjugation assay system. The role of TnpI as both a negative and positive regulator of TnpA function is discussed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains and plasmids. Escherichia coliDH5α (GIBCO BRL, Gaithersburg, Md.) was used as a host strain for molecular cloning experiments. Table 1describes the B. thuringiensis and E. colistrains and plasmids used in this study. Strain EG10368 is a derivative of the acrystalliferous (non-crystal-producing) B. thuringiensis strain HD73-26 (9) and contains a cryptic 4.9-MDa plasmid. Strain HD73-27R is an acrystalliferous derivative of HD73 that is resistant to the antibiotic rifampin. Strain EG2243 is a transconjugant derivative of strain HD73-26 that contains a self-transmissible 50-MDa plasmid and that is resistant to the antibiotic streptomycin. The temperature-sensitive transposon vector pEG922 contains a derivative of Tn5401 carrying a tetracycline resistance gene (tet) on an ∼7-kbSacI fragment. Plasmid pEG922 tnpI contains a frameshift mutation in the tnpI gene of Tn5401, while pEG922 tnpAΔ contains a deletion within thetnpA gene (3). Plasmid pEG853 is an E. coli-B. thuringiensis shuttle vector that contains the B. thuringiensis plasmid replication origin ori60(2). The Tn5401-tet plasmids pEG941, pEG941tnpAΔ, and pEG941 tnpI were constructed by isolating the ∼7-kb SacI fragments containing Tn5401-tet from pEG922, pEG922 tnpAΔ, and pEG922 tnpI, respectively, and inserting the SacI fragments into the unique SacI site of shuttle vector pEG853. Plasmids pEG941, pEG941 tnpAΔ, and pEG941tnpI were introduced into the B. thuringiensishost strain EG2243 to yield the B. thuringiensis strains EG11193, EG11194, and EG11195, respectively (Table 1). These streptomycin-resistant (Strr) strains were used as donor strains in broth mating experiments designed to measure transposition frequency. Plasmids pEG941, pEG941 tnpAΔ, and pEG941tnpI were also introduced into the related B. thuringiensis host strain EG10368 to yield strains EG7690, EG12153, and EG12154, respectively (Table 1). These strains were used for primer extension (RNA) and Western blot (protein) analyses oftnpA expression in B. thuringiensis. The bacteriophage lambda PR expression vector pKJB856, maintained in the DH5α derivative JMB110, was kindly provided by Kenneth Buckley (6). The DH5α recombinant strain EG7686, containing the tnpI expression vector pEG937, has been described previously (4). The DH5α recombinant strain EG7687 contains the tnpA expression vector pEG938 (see Results).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Strains and plasmids used in this study

DNA manipulations and analyses.Standard recombinant DNA procedures were performed essentially as described by Sambrook et al. (18). B. thuringiensis strains were transformed with the electroporation protocol described by Mettus and Macaluso (17). Resident B. thuringiensis plasmids were resolved on 0.52% agarose gels by a modified Eckhardt lysis procedure (10). Transcription from the PR promoter was monitored by primer extension analysis of total RNA as previously described with the oligonucleotide primer pr10: 5′-CTTCTTGAGATAAGCTAG-3′ (3). DNase I footprinting analyses of TnpI- and TnpA-DNA complexes were performed as previously described (4). PCRs were performed withTaq polymerase (Perkin-Elmer Corp., Foster City, Calif., Promega Corp., Madison, Wis.) or Taq polymerase plusTaq Extender (Stratagene, La Jolla, Calif.) under standard conditions as recommended by the manufacturers. The cycling regimen was 94°C for 30 s, 46°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 1 min, for 30 cycles.

Preparation of TnpI and TnpA soluble extracts.Both thetnpI and tnpA genes were expressed in E. coli DH5α by using the expression vector pKJB856. This vector contains the bacteriophage lambda PR promoter, a multiple cloning site, and a temperature-sensitive allele of the cI repressor gene. Transcription from PR is repressed at 30°C and derepressed at 37 to 41°C (6). The construction of the tnpI expression vector pEG937 and expression of thetnpI gene in E. coli EG7686 have been described previously (4). To express the tnpA gene inE. coli, a 4.8-kb NsiI restriction fragment from pEG911-2 (3) containing the entire tnpA gene was ligated to pKJB856, previously cleaved with PstI. The resulting plasmid, pEG938, contains the tnpA gene positioned in the proper orientation 3′ to the PR promoter for expression. The DH5α derivative harboring plasmid pEG938 was designated EG7687. A DH5α derivative harboring the expression vector pKJB856 (DH5α/pKJB856) was also constructed to serve as a control. Strains EG7686, EG7687, and DH5α/pKJB856 comprise a set of isogenic strains that differ only with respect to the presence or absence of TnpI and TnpA protein production. Induced 50-ml cultures of the TnpI- and TnpA-producing strains EG7686 and EG7687 were harvested by centrifugation at 3,200 × g (maximum) in a swinging-bucket rotor for 20 min at 4°C. The cell pellets were resuspended in 2 ml of lysis buffer (25 mM HEPES-NaOH [pH 7.0], 50 mM KCl, 10% glycerol, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, and 20 μg of leupeptin, 2 μg of pepstatin A, 20 μg of aprotinin, and 100 μg of phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride per ml) containing 1 mg of lysozyme per ml. After a 15-min incubation at room temperature, the cells were placed on ice for 5 min and disrupted by sonication. The cell lysates were centrifuged at 3,200 × g (maximum) for 20 min at 4°C. The supernatants were transferred to fresh tubes and centrifuged at 23,700 × g (maximum) for 20 min at 4°C. The clarified supernatants were divided into 50- to 500-μl aliquots and stored at −70°C. Control extracts containing only the expression vector pKJB856 were also prepared from the DH5α recombinant strain. Protein concentrations in soluble extracts were determined to be approximately 10 mg/ml as measured with the bicinchoninic acid protein assay system (Pierce, Rockford, Ill.). TnpI and TnpA proteins produced by induced cultures of strains EG7686 and EG7687, respectively, were detected on Western blots with anti-TnpI and anti-TnpA antibodies and standard procedures as described below.

Preparation of TnpI and TnpA antibodies.Induction oftnpI and tnpA expression in strains EG7686 and EG7687 results in the accumulation of polar inclusion bodies composed of the TnpI and TnpA proteins. Inclusions from lysed cultures were pelleted by centrifugation at 3,200 × g (maximum) in a swinging-bucket rotor for 20 min at 4°C. The inclusions were suspended in 5 ml of 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5)–100 mM NaCl–0.005% Triton X-100 and pelleted again by centrifugation. The inclusions were resuspended in 2.5 ml of 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5)–100 mM NaCl–0.005% Triton X-100 and loaded on a 55 to 78% Renografin 76 step gradient (TnpA) or a 55 to 78% Renografin 76 linear gradient (TnpI). The gradients were centrifuged at 18,000 rpm in an SW28 rotor for 16 to 20 h at 17°C. The TnpI inclusions were recovered from the bottom of the gradient, whereas the TnpA inclusions were recovered from the 55- to 78% interface. The inclusions were washed three times with 0.5 ml of water and resuspended in 0.5 ml of 0.005% Triton X-100. Rabbit polyclonal antibodies directed against TnpI and TnpA were obtained from Rockland, Inc. (Gilbertsville, Pa.), by using the purified inclusions as a source of antigen.

Detection of TnpA protein in B. thuringiensis.The EG10368 recombinant strains EG7690, EG12153, and EG12154, containing pEG941, pEG941 tnpAΔ, and pEG941 tnpI, respectively, comprise a set of isogenic B. thuringiensisstrains that differ only with respect to the mutations intnpI and tnpA. These strains were grown in Luria broth to mid-log phase (Klett reading, 150; red filter). The cells from 1-ml aliquots were harvested by centrifugation in a microcentrifuge and frozen at −70°C. The cell pellets were thawed and suspended in 500 μl of buffer (50 mM glucose, 20 mM Tris-HCl, 10 mM EDTA [pH 8.0]) containing 4 mg of lysozyme per ml and incubated at 37°C for 30 min. Aliquots of the suspension were treated with sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) sample buffer and heated at 100°C for 5 min, and the solubilized proteins were resolved on an SDS–10% polyacrylamide gel. The resolved proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose filters by electrophoresis and probed with anti-TnpA antibodies by standard procedures. The filters were blocked in 5% nonfat dry milk–150 mM NaCl–10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5 to 7.8) and washed with 150 mM NaCl–10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.8)–0.1% (wt/vol) globulin-free bovine serum albumin (BSA) containing 0.2% (vol/vol) Tween 80. Alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G (Sigma A-8702) was used as the secondary antibody. Antigen-antibody complexes were visualized on the filters with a nitroblue tetrazolium/BCIP (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolylphosphate) substrate kit obtained from Pierce (no. 34041).

DNA binding assay.PCR was used to amplify DNA fragments containing intact TIRs or truncated TIRs (TIRΔ) of Tn5401. Primers pr14 (5′-ACGTCTATAATGCAGCTAAAGATGGG-3′) and pr17 (5′-TGTGCGAATAATGTCCGC-3′) were used to amplify an ∼150-bp fragment containing the entire TIR sequence: 5′-GGGGTATGTGTAGCAATGGAACAGAATCACGCAACAAGCATTAGCGGACATTA-3′ (TnpI recognition sequence underlined). The TIRΔ was amplified with the opposing primers pr14 and pr16 (5′-GCTAATGCTTGTTGCGTG-3′) and is missing a portion of the TnpI recognition sequence: 5′-GGGG TATG TG TAGCAATGGAACAGAATCACGCAACAAGCAT TAGC - 3′. A biotin moiety was attached to the 5′ end of pr14 to permit recovery of the biotinylated fragments through binding to streptavidin-conjugated paramagnetic particles (SPP; Promega Corp.). The fragments obtained from the PCRs (100-μl volume) were purified with the QIAquik PCR purification kit (Qiagen, Inc., Santa Clarita, Calif.) and suspended in 100 μl of sterile water. Ten microliters of the amplified TIR and TIRΔ fragments was incubated in a solution containing 20 mM Tris-HCl, 100 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 5% glycerol, 100 μg of sheared calf thymus DNA per ml, and 100 μg of BSA per ml with 10 μl of the soluble TnpI and/or TnpA extracts. After a 30-min incubation at room temperature, 10 μl of the SPP (1 mg/ml in 1× phosphate-buffered saline [PBS]) was added to the binding reaction mixtures. The suspensions were incubated for 15 min at room temperature to ensure binding of the SPP to the biotinylated DNA fragments. The SPP-DNA-protein complexes were recovered from the suspensions with a magnet and washed twice with 500 μl of binding buffer and twice with BSA-free binding buffer. The SPP-DNA complexes were finally suspended in 20 μl of SDS sample buffer and heated at 100°C for 5 min, and the associated proteins were resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). The recovered TnpI and TnpA proteins were detected by Western blot analysis with antisera raised against the TnpI and TnpA inclusions. The resolved proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose filters by electrophoresis and probed with antibodies by standard procedures. The filters were blocked in 5% nonfat dry milk–80 mM NaCl–50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0)–2 mM CaCl2–0.2% NP-40 and washed with PBS (150 mM NaCl, 16 mM Na2HPO4, 4 mM Na2HPO4) containing 0.2% Tween 20. Alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G (Sigma; A-8702) was used as the secondary antibody. Antigen-antibody complexes were visualized on the filters with a nitroblue tetrazolium/BCIP substrate kit obtained from Pierce (no. 34041).

Transposition assay.A single chloramphenicol-resistant (Cmr) colony of EG11193, EG11194, and EG11195 was grown in 1× brain heart infusion–0.5% glycerol (BHIG) containing 3 μg of chloramphenicol per ml until late log stage to provide donor cells for conjugation. The rifampin-resistant recipient strain HD73-27R was grown in BHIG. Equal volumes (4 μl) of donor and recipient cells were mixed in 1 ml of BHIG and grown overnight at 30°C with gentle agitation. The broth matings were subsequently plated on Luria-Bertani (LB) plates containing 10 μg of tetracycline and 10 μg of rifampin per ml to determine the transfer frequency of the Tetr marker, on LB plates containing 3 μg of chloramphenicol and 10 μg of rifampin per ml to determine the background conjugal transfer frequency of the recombinant plasmid, on LB plates containing 10 μg of rifampin per ml to determine the number of recipient cells, and on LB plates containing 100 μg of streptomycin and 10 μg of tetracycline per ml to determine the number of donor cells. Transposition frequency was expressed as the frequency of Tetr Rifrtransconjugants (per donor or per recipient cell) minus the frequency of Cmr Rifr transconjugants (per donor or recipient cell).

RESULTS

Effect of tnpI and tnpA mutations on transposition.With the Tn5401 transposon vector pEG922, a transposition frequency of 10−2 to 10−4 in B. thuringiensis was previously determined for Tn5401-tet (3). Transposition frequencies obtained with pEG922 tnpAΔ (Tn5401-tet tnpAΔ) were 10- to 1,000-fold lower than those obtained with pEG922, indicating that disruption of tnpA impaired transposition. The effect of a tnpI mutation on transposition frequency could not be measured reliably because the transposon plasmid, pEG922 tnpI, shows a 40-fold-lower copy number than either pEG922 or pEG922 tnpAΔ and exhibited instability (3). In this study, Tn5401-tet and its tnpI and tnpAΔ derivatives were subcloned into pEG853, a shuttle vector whose copy number and stability are not affected by either the tnpI or tnpAΔ mutation (5) and which contains a chloramphenicol resistance genecat. The transposition frequencies of Tn5401-tetand its tnpI and tnpAΔ derivatives, contained on the pEG853-based plasmids pEG941 (Fig.2), pEG941 tnpI, and pEG941tnpAΔ, respectively, were then compared by measuring the transposition of the Tetr marker (contained within Tn5401) to a resident 50-MDa plasmid and its subsequent transfer to strain HD73-27R in broth mating experiments (Fig.3). This can be accomplished because (i) Tn5401-tet transposes readily to large plasmids (3) and (ii) the conjugal transfer frequency of the 50-MDa plasmid is very high (>0.1 transconjugant/recipient cell [5, 9]), whereas the transfer frequency of the pEG853-based plasmids containing Tn5401-tet is very low (10−5 to 10−6 transconjugant/recipient cell [5]). Thus, for Tn5401-tet on plasmid pEG941, the frequency of Tetr transfer to HD73-27R via transposition to the 50-MDa plasmid should be much higher than the frequency of Cmr transfer to HD73-27R via transfer of pEG941. It should be noted that the mechanism by which pEG941 and other small recombinant plasmids are able to transfer from donor to recipient is not understood. Transposition frequency was expressed as the frequency of Tetr Rifr transconjugants (per donor or per recipient cell) minus the frequency of CmrRifr transconjugants (per donor or per recipient cell). The results of three independent experiments are shown in Table2. Average transposition frequencies of 1.4 × 10−3 to 4.1 × 10−3 were obtained for Tn5401-tet (EG11193), while average transposition frequencies of 10−6 were obtained for Tn5401-tet tnpI (EG11195) and Tn5401-tet tnpAΔ (EG11194). These results are in good agreement with those obtained previously by using the transposon vector pEG922 and itstnpI and tnpAΔ derivatives (3).

Fig. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Structural map of the transposon plasmid pEG941. The modified transposon Tn5401-tet is flanked by 53-bp TIRs. Atet gene fragment was inserted into the uniqueClaI site of Tn5401 (Fig. 1A) to generate Tn5401-tet. tet, tetracycline resistance gene from pBC16; cat, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene from pC194; ori60, B. thuringiensis plasmid replication origin.

Fig. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Coupled transposition-conjugation assay. In this example, the Strr strain EG11193 serves as the donor and the Rifr strain HD73-27R serves as the recipient. Solid box, Tn5401-tet; shaded box, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene (cat). See the text for a description of the assay.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Effect of tnpA and tnpI mutations on the transposition of Tn5401-tet

Because the tnpI mutation blocks the resolution of cointegrate molecules formed during Tn5401 transposition (4), transposition of Tn5401-tet tnpI should result in transfer of both the Tetr and Cmrmarkers. Nevertheless, only 6 of 32 Cmr Rifrcolonies from the EG11195 broth mating showed a transposon insertion into the 50-MDa plasmid as determined by Eckhardt gel analysis (5). Thus, the transposition frequency obtained with Tn5401-tet tnpI was approximately 1,000-fold lower than that obtained with Tn5401-tet and comparable to that obtained with Tn5401-tet tnpAΔ.

Effect of tnpI on tnpA expression.Previous analyses indicated that disruption of the tnpI gene on the high-copy-number transposon vector pEG922 results in increased transcription of tnpI and tnpA from PR (3). To confirm these findings, total RNA was isolated from mid-log-phase cultures of strains EG7690 (pEG941), EG12153 (pEG941 tnpAΔ), and EG12154 (pEG941tnpI) and transcription from PR was monitored by primer extension analysis (Fig. 4A). A faint mRNA transcript corresponding to initiation at PRcould be detected in EG7690 (wild-type [wt]) and EG12153 (tnpA). A more abundant transcript corresponding to initiation at PR was detected in EG12154 (tnpI), suggesting that PR is normally under tight regulation and that disruption of tnpI leads to increased transcription from PR.

Fig. 4.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Effect of tnpI and tnpA mutations on tnpA expression. (A) Primer extension analysis oftnpI-tnpA mRNAs produced by mid-log-phase cultures of EG7690 (wt), EG12153 (tnpA), and EG12154 (tnpI). The primer extension product corresponds to transcripts initiated at the promoter PR (3) (Fig. 1B). (B) Western blot analysis of TnpA protein produced by mid-log-phase cultures of EG7690 (wt), EG12153 (tnpA), and EG12154 (tnpI). MW, molecular weight standards.

The apparent elevation of tnpA mRNA in EG12154 would be expected to result in an elevated level of TnpA production. The production of TnpA protein in mid-log-phase cultures was measured by Western blot analysis (Fig. 4B) with polyclonal antibodies raised against TnpA inclusions produced in E. coli EG7687. No TnpA protein could be detected in strain EG7690 (wt) containing Tn5401-tet or in strain EG12153 (Tn5401-tet tnpAΔ). TnpA protein was readily detected in strain EG12154 (Tn5401-tet tnpI), indicating that the disruption oftnpI leads to the accumulation of TnpA protein.

TnpA and TnpI binding to the TIRs of Tn5401.TnpI has been shown to bind to a 12-bp recognition sequence contained within the TIRs of Tn5401 by DNase I footprinting analysis (4). This analysis was extended to determine the conditions for TnpA binding to the TIRs. Soluble extracts were prepared from the TnpI- and TnpA-producing strains EG7686 and EG7687 (Table 1) by the procedure described for the preparation of TnpI extracts (4). As a control, a soluble extract was prepared from a DH5α recombinant strain harboring the expression vector pKJB856. Because of the isogenic nature of the strains used, the soluble extracts should differ only with respect to the presence or absence of TnpA and TnpI protein. TnpA protein was recovered from inclusion bodies produced by induced cultures of strain EG7687 (see Materials and Methods), but TnpA protein in soluble extracts could not be reliably identified by SDS-PAGE (Fig. 5A). To confirm the presence of TnpA in the EG7687 extract, proteins separated by SDS-PAGE were blotted to a nitrocellulose membrane and probed with antibodies raised against either TnpI or TnpA inclusion bodies (Fig.5B). Although the TnpA antibodies showed a strong cross-reaction to an unidentified E. coli protein (cross-reacting material), a protein of the expected molecular mass (∼100 kDa) for TnpA was detected in the EG7687 extract and not in the control or EG7686 extracts. Similarly, TnpI protein was identified in the EG7686 extract with antibodies raised against the TnpI inclusion bodies but not in the control or EG7687 extracts. These extracts (∼10 mg of total protein per ml) were subsequently used as a source of TnpI and TnpA proteins for the DNA-binding studies.

Fig. 5.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

Western blot analysis of TnpI- and TnpA-producing strains. Proteins from soluble extracts (100 μg of total protein) ofE. coli EG7687 (lane 1), EG7686 (lane 2), and DH5α(pKJB856) (lane 3) were resolved on an SDS-polyacrylamide (10%) gel and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. (A) SDS-polyacrylamide gel stained with Coomassie blue R-250. (B) Western blots probed with either TnpA antibodies (top panel) or TnpI antibodies (bottom panel). M, molecular mass standards in kilodaltons; CRM, cross-reacting material.

A 32P-end-labeled (∼20,000 Cerenkov cpm)BamHI-ScaI fragment from pEG911-3 (3, 4) containing the TIR of Tn5401 was incubated with TnpI, TnpI plus control extract, TnpA, TnpA plus control extract, and TnpI plus TnpA and treated briefly with DNase I. After purification, the DNA fragments were resolved on a 6% sequencing gel. Consistent with a previous study (4), TnpI binding to the TIR fragment resulted in protection of the 12-bp recognition sequence and the generation of a DNase I-hypersensitive site (Fig.6, lanes 2 and 3). TnpI binding also renders a portion of the 38-bp terminal Tn3-like sequence resistant to DNase I cleavage (4). In the presence of TnpA, however, little if any protection from DNase I cleavage was observed (compare lane 1 with lanes 5 and 6). A 1:1 (vol/vol) mixture of the TnpI and TnpA preparations, however, yielded a large footprint encompassing and extending beyond the entire TIR sequence (lane 4). This extended footprint can most easily be attributed to the binding of both TnpI and TnpA to the TIR.

Fig. 6.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 6.

DNase I footprinting analysis of the Tn5401TIR. A 326-bp BamHI-ScaI fragment from pEG911-3 (3), end labeled at the BamHI site, was incubated with soluble extracts (10 μg of soluble protein per ml), treated with DNase I, and purified, and the resulting DNA fragments were resolved on a 6% sequencing gel. Lanes: 1, 10 μl of control extract; 2, 10 μl of TnpI extract; 3, 10 μl of TnpI extract plus 10 μl of control extract; 4, 10 μl of TnpI extract plus 10 μl of TnpA extract; 5, 10 μl of TnpA extract plus 10 μl of control extract; 6, 10 μl of TnpA extract. The locations of the 12-bp TnpI recognition sequence and the 38-bp Tn3-like terminal repeat sequence (Fig. 1C) are indicated by the brackets. DHSS, DNase I-hypersensitive site.

To confirm that TnpA binding was influenced by TnpI, an alternative DNA-binding assay using biotinylated DNA fragments containing either an intact TIR or TIRΔ was devised. TIRΔ is missing the first 6 bp (5′-ATGTCC-3′) of the 12-bp TnpI recognition sequence and consequently cannot specifically bind TnpI (see Materials and Methods). Various combinations of TnpI, TnpA, and control extracts were incubated with the biotinylated fragments, using inputs that provided complete protection from DNase I cleavage in the footprinting experiments. The DNA-protein complexes were recovered with SPP and, after extensive washing of the ternary complexes, the bound proteins were analyzed on Western blots with TnpI and TnpA antisera (Fig.7). TnpA protein binding to TIR was observed only in the presence of TnpI. TnpA protein binding to TIRΔ was not observed, despite the presence of TnpI. Under these assay conditions, TnpI does exhibit some nonspecific binding to DNA (5), yet this was insufficient for TnpA binding to TIRΔ.

Fig. 7.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 7.

DNA-binding assay. Biotinylated DNA fragments, each containing an intact TIR or TIRΔ, were incubated with TnpA, TnpI, and/or control extracts (10- or 20-μl volumes, as indicated above the blots, containing 10 μg of soluble protein per μl). SPP were used to isolate the resulting DNA-protein complexes. Bound proteins were analyzed on Western blots with TnpI antibodies (top panel) or TnpA antibodies (bottom panel). For each blot, the first lane contains the soluble TnpI or TnpA extract as a standard.

DISCUSSION

Tn5401 transposition appears to be mechanistically similar to that of Tn3 (19). Cointegrate molecules formed as intermediates during the transposition process by a Tn3-like transposase are resolved by the site-specific recombinase TnpI (3, 4). TnpI also regulates Tn5401 transposition by serving as a repressor oftnpI and tnpA transcription (reference3 and this study), an apparent consequence of TnpI binding to the promoter regions of tnpI and tnpA. In this study, we present evidence that TnpI regulates Tn5401 transposition at the posttranslational level by modulating the interaction of TnpA transposase with the TIRs.

The observation that the unusually long 53-bp TIRs of Tn5401contain adjacent recognition sites for TnpA and TnpI led to the hypothesis that TnpI regulates the enzymatic or DNA-binding activity of TnpA (4). The close proximity of the binding sites suggests that the DNA-bound proteins could physically interact. Two different methods were employed to examine DNA-protein interactions. First, a conventional DNase I footprinting analysis was used to detect interactions between TnpA, TnpI, and the TIR of Tn5401. Consistent with previous studies (4), TnpI binding to the TIR results in a footprint that extends beyond its 12-bp recognition sequence (Fig. 6). Under the conditions used in our assays, the addition of TnpA protein alone afforded little, if any, protection from DNase I cleavage. A mixture of TnpI and TnpA, however, yielded an extended footprint that included and extended beyond the entire TIR sequence. The second method employed SPP to capture TnpI and TnpA proteins bound to biotinylated DNA fragments containing an intact or truncated TIR. In this instance, TnpA capture was observed only in the presence of TnpI and an intact TIR sequence.

While a number of explanations could account for these phenomena, we propose the most likely hypothesis: that TnpI promotes the binding of TnpA to the TIR. The apparent inability of TnpA to bind TIRΔ in the presence of TnpI suggests that TnpI must bind specifically to the TIR in order to facilitate TnpA binding. It is possible that TnpA does not bind DNA and that TnpI alone contributes the DNA-binding function required for localization of a TnpI-TnpA complex at the TIR. Thus, the extended footprint shown in Fig. 6 (lane 4) could be due to further exclusion of DNase I from the TIR sequence by a larger TnpI-TnpA dimer or multimer. Similarly, the apparent binding of TnpA to the TIR shown in Fig. 7 could be the indirect effect of TnpA binding exclusively to TnpI. We think this is unlikely because (i) a derivative of Tn5401 containing a frameshift mutation in tnpI(Tn5401-tet tnpI) can generate cointegrate molecules at a low frequency in B. thuringiensis (3), indicating that TnpA must exhibit some undetectable binding to the TIRs in the absence of TnpI and (ii) the nonspecific binding of TnpI to the TIRΔ did not result in the recovery of TnpA (Fig. 7), as would be expected if TnpA were merely binding to TnpI.

Provided TnpI is essential for the binding of TnpA to the TIR, mutations in tnpI should effectively block Tn5401-tet cointegrate formation. A coupled transposition-conjugation assay system was developed to compare the transposition frequencies for Tn5401-tet, Tn5401-tet tnpI, and Tn5401-tet tnpAΔ in B. thuringiensis. Mutations in either tnpA ortnpI reduced the transfer of the transposon-linked Tetr marker to the resident 50-MDa plasmid of B. thuringiensis EG2243 by 500- to 2,500-fold. Since B. thuringiensis strains carrying Tn5401-tet tnpI exhibit elevated levels of tnpA mRNA and TnpA protein, the reduction in cointegrate formation (Tetr transfer) cannot be due to inadequate levels of TnpA but to the absence of TnpI.

Thus, the regulation of Tn5401 transposition in B. thuringiensis is controlled at both the transcriptional and posttranslational levels by the TnpI recombinase. The following scenario can be proposed. Below a critical concentration of TnpI, transcription from PR may proceed, leading to the production of TnpI and TnpA protein. The subsequent increase in TnpI concentration inhibits transcription from PR but allows TnpA to bind the TIRs and proceed with the formation of cointegrate intermediates that are subsequently resolved by TnpI. One outcome of this regulatory arrangement may be that cointegrate molecules will not be formed unless there is sufficient TnpI protein available to complete the transposition process. This is reflected in the low transposition frequencies observed for Tn5401-tet tnpI (reference3 and this study).

There are reports that the function of transposases encoded by mobile genetic elements can be modulated by other proteins (14). For instance, integration host factor (IHF) has been shown to facilitate the binding of transposase to the termini of the Tn3-like transposon γδ (21). IHF has also been shown to play a role in the transposition of IS1(8), IS50 and Tn5 (16), IS10 (12, 20), and Tn4652(11). Horak and Kivisaar (11) suggest that IHF binding to the termini of Tn4652, in addition to activating the transcription of tnpA, may also modulate the binding or catalytic activity of the TnpA transposase. The involvement of a transposon-encoded recombinase to modulate the DNA-binding activity of its associated transposase, as for Tn5401, has not been reported. The most closely related transposon, Tn4430, encodes a TnpI-like recombinase but does not have TnpI binding sites closely associated with the TIRs (15), suggesting that the role of TnpI in regulating Tn5401 transposition is unique.

The role of TnpI in regulating the DNA-binding activity of TnpA provides a logical checkpoint in the regulation of Tn5401transposition but does not exclude other roles for TnpI in modulating, for instance, the catalytic activity of TnpA. It would be interesting to explore whether other class II transposons show a similar coordination in the activities of their recombinase and transposase proteins.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 13 January 1999.
    • Accepted 6 August 1999.
  • Copyright © 1999 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Argos P.,
    2. Landy A.,
    3. Abremski K.,
    4. Egan J. B.,
    5. Haggard-Ljungquist E.,
    6. Hoess R. H.,
    7. Kahn M. L.,
    8. Kalionis B.,
    9. Narayana S. B. L.,
    10. Pierson L. S. III,
    11. Sternberg N.,
    12. Leong J. M.
    The integrase family of site-specific recombinases: regional similarities and global diversity.EMBO J.51986433440
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Baum J. A.,
    2. Coyle D. M.,
    3. Jany C. S.,
    4. Gilbert M. P.,
    5. Gawron-Burke C.
    Novel cloning vectors for Bacillus thuringiensis.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.56199034203428
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Baum J. A.
    Tn5401, a new class II transposable element from Bacillus thuringiensis.J. Bacteriol.176199428352845
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Baum J. A.
    TnpI recombinase: identification of sites within Tn5401 required for TnpI binding and site-specific recombination.J. Bacteriol.177199540364042
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    Baum, J. A., and A.-M. Mettus.Unpublished data.
  6. 6.↵
    1. Buckley K. J.
    Ph.D. dissertation. 1985 University of California, San Diego
  7. 7.↵
    1. Donovan W. P.,
    2. Gonzalez J. M. Jr.,
    3. Gilbert M. P.,
    4. Dankocsik C.
    Isolation and characterization of EG2158, a new strain of Bacillus thuringiensis toxic to coleopteran larvae, and nucleotide sequence of the toxin gene.Mol. Gen. Genet.2141988365372
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    1. Gamas P.,
    2. Chandler M. G.,
    3. Prentki P.,
    4. Galas D. J.
    Escherichia coli integration host factor binds specifically to the ends of the insertion sequence IS1 and to its major insertion hot-spot in pBR322.J. Mol. Biol.1951987261272
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    1. Gonzalez J. M. Jr.
    Ph.D. thesis. 1984 University of Georgia Athens
  10. 10.↵
    1. Gonzalez J. M. Jr.,
    2. Dulmage H. T.,
    3. Carlton B. C.
    Correlation between specific plasmids and delta endotoxin production in Bacillus thuringiensis.Plasmid51981351365
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Horak R.,
    2. Kivisaar M.
    Expression of the transposase gene tnpA of Tn4652 is positively affected by integration host factor.J. Bacteriol.180199828222829
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Huisman O.,
    2. Errada P. R.,
    3. Signon L.,
    4. Kleckner N.
    Mutational analysis of IS10’s outside end.EMBO J.8198921012109
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    1. Kleckner N.
    Transposable elements in prokaryotes.Annu. Rev. Genet.151981341404
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    1. Kleckner N.
    Regulation of transposition in bacteria.Annu. Rev. Cell Biol.61990297327
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. 15.↵
    1. Mahillon J.,
    2. Lereclus D.
    Structural and functional analysis of Tn4430: identification of an integrase-like protein involved in the co-integrate-resolution process.EMBO J.7198815151526
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    1. Makris J. C.,
    2. Nordmann P. L.,
    3. Reznikoff W. S.
    Integration host factor plays a role in IS50 and Tn5 transposition.J. Bacteriol.172199013681373
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Mettus A.-M.,
    2. Macaluso A.
    Expression of Bacillus thuringiensis δ-endotoxin genes during vegetative growth.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.56199011281134
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Sambrook J.,
    2. Fritsch E. F.,
    3. Maniatis T.
    Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual 2nd ed. 1989 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y
  19. 19.↵
    1. Sherratt D.
    Tn3 and related transposable elements: site-specific recombination and transposition Mobile DNA. Berg D. E., Howe M. M. 1989 163 184 American Society for Microbiology Washington, D.C.
  20. 20.↵
    1. Signon L.,
    2. Kleckner N.
    Negative and positive regulation of Tn10/IS10-promoted recombination by IHF: two distinguishable processes inhibit transposition off of multicopy plasmid replicons and activate chromosomal events that favor evolution of new transposons.Genes Dev.9199511231136
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Wiatar L. A.,
    2. Grindley N. D.
    Gamma delta transposase and integration host factor bind cooperatively at both ends of gamma delta.EMBO J.7198819071911
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Multiple Roles for TnpI Recombinase in Regulation of Tn5401 Transposition in Bacillus thuringiensis
James A. Baum, Amy Jelen Gilmer, Anne-Marie Light Mettus
Journal of Bacteriology Oct 1999, 181 (20) 6271-6277; DOI: 10.1128/JB.181.20.6271-6277.1999

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Bacteriology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Multiple Roles for TnpI Recombinase in Regulation of Tn5401 Transposition in Bacillus thuringiensis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Bacteriology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Bacteriology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Multiple Roles for TnpI Recombinase in Regulation of Tn5401 Transposition in Bacillus thuringiensis
James A. Baum, Amy Jelen Gilmer, Anne-Marie Light Mettus
Journal of Bacteriology Oct 1999, 181 (20) 6271-6277; DOI: 10.1128/JB.181.20.6271-6277.1999
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JB
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #Jbacteriology

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0021-9193; Online ISSN: 1098-5530