Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Bacteriology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
GENETICS AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY

Genetic Transfer of Large DNA Inserts to Designated Loci of the Bacillus subtilis 168 Genome

Mitsuhiro Itaya
Mitsuhiro Itaya
Mitsubishi Kasei Institute of Life Sciences, Machida-shi, Tokyo 194-8511, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JB.181.3.1045-1048.1999
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

It was found that contiguous DNA segments of up to 50 kb can be transferred between Bacillus subtilis genomes when a sufficient length of the flanking genomic region is provided for homologous recombination, although the efficiency of transfer was reduced as the insert size increased. Inserts were translocated to different loci, where appropriate integration sites were created.

A previous comparison of sequenced bacterial genomes strongly indicated a frequent exchange of genes between bacterial species in nature which is called a “horizontal transfer” (5). Bacillus subtilis168, a gram-positive endospore-forming soil bacterium, has been shown to develop a competence to integrate cognate genomic regions (8) and noncognate DNA inserts into its genome (3, 4, 10-13). The B. subtilis 168 genes for developing competency are known, and the mechanism underlying the uptake of single-stranded DNA through the cell membrane has been elucidated (6, 7). While the average size of the DNA segments incorporated into B. subtilis cytoplasm was estimated to be 8.5 kb (7), the maximum genomic distance covered by contiguous DNA was estimated by the mapping of two linked genomic markers to be approximately 30 kb (8). Because these two figures are inconsistent, a systematic investigation was needed to clarify how great a length of contiguous DNA can be integrated into theB. subtilis genome. Previously constructed noncognate lambda DNA inserts ranging from 16.8 to 48.5 kb in the B. subtilis genome (11) were considered appropriate for such an investigation.

The lambda inserts constructed in the pBR322 sequence that had been integrated into the NotI site of the proB gene are described in reference 11 and in the legend to Fig. 1. The donor strains BEST2204 to BEST2207 listed in Table 1 and Fig.1 and those constructed in this study each have two antibiotic markers at the end of the variable length of the lambda insert, i.e., the 1.0-kb chloramphenicol resistance gene cassette (Cm), the 1.2-kb erythromycin resistance gene cassette (except for the 16.8-kb insert) (Em), and the tetracycline resistance gene (Tc; 1.9 kb), integrated into the leuB gene. The transfer of the insert to the recipient 168 trpC2 genome was carried out by homologous recombination of the genomic regions flanking theproB genes of the recipient and the donor, as shown in Fig.1. If the entire noncognate section of donor DNA is integrated into the recipient genome according to this scheme, both the Cm and the Em markers should be simultaneously integrated. Thus, transformants selected by chloramphenicol (CM) (at 5 μg/ml) should be erythromycin (EM) resistant (at 5 μg/ml), and vice versa.

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Transfer of the lambda insert in the recipientB. subtilis genome. Large circles represent theB. subtilis genome with the locations oforiC, proB, terC, and leuBlabeled. The donor strains had two extra DNA segments in their genomes; one is a lambda DNA sequence (heavy line) flanked by pBR322 sequences (closed and hatched boxes) integrated in the proB gene (11), and the other is a tetracycline resistance gene inserted in the leuB gene (Table 1). The transfer of the lambda DNA plus pBR322 sequences to the recipient genome proceeded via crossovers in the flanking genomic region when strain 168trpC2 was used as a recipient. Transfer of the lambda insert to the leuB locus was carried out by crossovers within the pBR322 sequence prepared in the BEST2131 genome (10). BEST2209 had two 26.2-kb lambda DNA inserts, one in proB and the other in leuB.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study

For example, in the 39.5-kb transfer, the 200 CM-resistant transformants obtained by BEST2205 × 168 trpC2 were all EM resistant. Genomes of the six representative clones were analyzed by NotI, SfiI, andHindIII and by Southern analyses using pBR322 and lambda DNA as probes. It was confirmed that all six clones acquired the contiguous 39.5-kb insert in the proB locus (data not shown). Similarly, the 200 transformants selected by EM, six of which had genome structures identical to those selected by CM, were all CM resistant (data not shown). Other inserts with variable lengths of lambda DNA were similarly examined, and it was verified that all of the CM-resistant colonies tested were also EM resistant (data not shown).HindIII was obtained from Toyobo (Tokyo, Japan),SfiI was obtained from New England Biolabs (Beverly, Mass.), and NotI was obtained from Takara Shuzo (Kyoto, Japan). DNA manipulations in vitro were done according to the methods described in reference 20 or the manufacturers’ instructions unless otherwise specified. The Southern hybridization procedure has been described previously (11). Luria Bertani broth (17) was used for the growth ofB. subtilis at 37°C.

For the measurement of transformation efficiency, competentB. subtilis 168 trpC2 was prepared as previously described (23) and stored at −70°C in the presence of dimethyl sulfoxide at 20% (vol/vol). Frozen competent cells were used within several weeks, during which the transformation efficiency remained unaltered, giving ∼104 transformants per μg of DNA. High-molecular-weight genomic DNA was prepared by the method of Saito and Miura (19), and the concentrations of DNA solutions, as determined by their UV absorption at 260 nm measured by a spectrophotometer (DU640; Beckman Instruments, Inc., Fullerton, Calif.), were 45 μg/ml for BEST2204, 27.5 μg/ml for BEST2207, 29.9 μg/ml for BEST2042, 31.3 μg/ml for BEST2205, and 30.0 μg/ml for BEST2206. Diluted solutions were left for at least 1 day at room temperature with occasional gentle shaking before use. Each transformation experiment was performed at least three times.

The calculated numbers of CM-resistant transformants per μg of DNA are plotted against insert sizes from 0 to 48.5 kb in Fig.2. A logarithmic decrease in CM-resistant transformants was observed with each increase in the concentration of DNA (from 0.27 to 6.7 μg/ml) in contrast to the constant number of tetracycline-resistant transformants (selected at 10 μg/ml). Transfer of the leuB::tet marker occurred independently of the lambda transfer, because theleuB gene is located 1,518 kb away from the proBgene (12, 15) and the distance is far longer than the lengths of donor DNAs, which are comprised of sheared, 200- to 400-kb segments. The donor DNA of strain BEST2206, having the longest (55 kb) insert (comprised of lambda [48.5 kb] plus pBR322 [4.3 kb] plus Em [1.2 kb] plus Cm [1.0 kb]), still gave 111 ± 8 CM-resistant transformants per μg of DNA (Fig. 2). It is likely that DNA segments longer than 55 kb are included in the DNA uptake and recombinational processes of transformation. The almost linear logarithmic decrease in transfer efficiency at the unsaturated concentration (approximately 1/10 per 50 kb [Fig. 2]) supports the adverse affect of the insert size. A slight downshift from the linear decrease was observed at other concentrations. The rate of tetracycline resistance transformations did not change at saturated concentrations, and this lowered efficiency suggests a rate-determining step by the recombination machinery to replace the DNA segment including the long noncognate inserts.

Fig. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Decrease of DNA transfer efficiency with increase in size of the lambda inserts. The numbers of CM-resistant (closed symbols) and tetracycline-resistant (open symbols) transformants per microgram of DNA are plotted against the lambda insert size of the donor strains. The concentrations of DNA used are 0.27 μg/ml (• and ○), 0.67 μg/ml (■ and □), 1.34 μg/ml (⧫ and ◊), and 6.7 μg/ml (▴ and ▵). Standard deviations are indicated by vertical bars. Maximum standard deviation of the 0-kb value was 35% (⧫), and others ranged between 8 and 28%.

A controversial observation with respect to the size of incorporated single-stranded DNA in cytoplasm, i.e., on average 8.5 kb, remained to be confirmed (7). One possible explanation is that higher-molecular-weight DNA is actually involved in integration and that the DNA processed during rapid recombination remained and was observed as a major population. Alternatively, perhaps long inserts with nonhomologous sequences stabilized the DNA during uptake and/or during a recombinational process. Results similar to those shown in Fig. 2 were obtained by using strain RM125 as a recipient (data not shown), indicating that the restriction modification system did not discriminate the lambda transfer.

Since the horizontal transfer from proB to proBwas established, the question of whether the sequences for integration are provided in different loci of recipient genomes arose. Recipient BEST2131 has a pBR322 sequence integrated in the leuB gene (10), and this type of transfer was mediated by homologous recombination within pBR322, which flanks the lambda insert (as schematically illustrated in Fig. 1). Since all donors have theleuB::tet marker, only recombinants whose Tc gene is displaced by the lambda insert become tetracycline sensitive. The Cm marker was used to select the lambda transfer to BEST2131, and the DNA concentration was increased to 6.7 μg/ml to obtain more transformants. Among the 225 CM-resistant colonies in the case of the 16.8-kb transfer, only one tetracycline-sensitive strain (BEST2211) was obtained. Similarly, 2 (BEST2208 and BEST2209) of 231 CM-resistant colonies in the 26.2-kb transfer and 1 (BEST2210) of 334 CM-resistant colonies in the 39.5-kb transfer were obtained. No transfer of 48.5 kb was observed after screening 792 CM-resistant colonies.

The lambda insert in the leuB loci of BEST2208 through BEST2211 was verified by an increase of SfiI fragments to which the leuB gene is attached (Fig.3). The Southern analysis of theHindIII digests of these genomic DNAs indicated no obvious rearrangements in the newly transferred lambda DNA (data not shown). These observations are consistent with the scheme shown in Fig.1, although the DNA transfer efficiency was significantly reduced. This low efficiency was probably due to the short sequence of pBR322 and may be improved by using a longer sequence for integration or a rapid selection method for the integrants.

Fig. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Transfer of lambda insert to the leuB locus.SfiI digests of the genome (2 to 3 μg) of the indicatedB. subtilis strains were separated by contour-clamped homogeneous electric field gel electrophoresis, and the results are shown in the left panel. Running conditions were as follows: 3 V cm−1, 24-s pulse time, and 40-h running time at 14°C. Twenty-six SfiI fragments originally designated based on the physical map (9, 12) were verified by the determined nucleotide sequence (15) and are shown as AS to ZS, with predicted sizes in parentheses. The 28 kb fragments of the donor strains in which the proB gene is located (labeled TS) were increased by the insert size (indicated by open arrowheads) and hybridized by labeled lambda DNA (right panel). The fragment of BEST2131 in which the leuB gene is located (labeled ES) is shown by a horizontal arrow in the BEST2131 lane. The ES fragments of BEST2131 derivatives (closed arrowheads), hybridized by labeled lambda DNA (right panel), were increased by the size of lambda DNA integrated. BEST2209 had two lambda inserts. The shortened ES fragment (202 kb) was caused by a newly created SfiI site in the leuBgene at 2,896 kb (10).

It is noteworthy that strain BEST2209 was shown to have two 26.2-kb inserts, one in leuB (characterized above) and the other inproB (Fig. 1). The SfiI fragments in whichleuB and proB are located were increased in size by 26.2 kb and were detected by the lambda DNA probe (Fig. 3) and pBR322 (data not shown). Southern analyses of theHindIII digests indicated that lambda and adjacent genomic regions of BEST2209 were the sum of those of BEST2042 (insert only in proB) and BEST2208 (insert only inleuB) (data not shown). These two lambda structures did not segregate in colonies of BEST2209 (data not shown). Strain BEST2209 grew normally without noticeable instability of the genome structure. This strain may be useful in the study of intrachromosomal DNA rearrangements and duplications or the subgenomic formation of the approximately 1,518-kb region between leuB andproB (14, 24).

Unlike Haemophilus influenzae, the competent strains of B. subtilis did not discriminate the nucleotide sequences of the incoming DNA (16). Interchromosomal recombination efficiency did not significantly differ within the B. subtilis genome (1), which allows the choice of appropriate genomic loci for the integration and relocation of new inserts. The present results will facilitate the manipulation of longer segments of DNA in genome engineering withB. subtilis, using techniques reported previously (11, 14).

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 6 August 1998.
    • Accepted 19 November 1998.
  • Copyright © 1999 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Biswas I.,
    2. Vagner V.,
    3. Ehrlich S. D.
    Efficiency of homologous intermolecular recombination at different locations on the Bacillus subtilis chromosome.J. Bacteriol.174199255935596
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.
    1. Chu G.,
    2. Vollrath D.,
    3. Davis R. W.
    Separation of large DNA molecules by contour-clamped homogeneous electric fields.Science234198615821585
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Cohan F. M.
    Genetic exchange and evolutionary divergence in prokaryotes.Trends Ecol. Evol.91994175180
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Cutting S.,
    2. Horn P. B. V.
    Gene cloning techniques Molecular biological methods for Bacillus—1990. Harwood C. R., Cutting S. 1990 27 74 John Wiley and Sons Chichester, England
  5. 5.↵
    1. Doolittle R. F.
    Microbial genomes opened up.Nature3921998339342
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    1. Dubnau D.
    Genetic competence in Bacillus subtilis.Microbiol. Rev.551991395424
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Dubnau D.
    Binding and transport of transforming DNA by Bacillus subtilis: the role of type-IV pilin-like proteins—a review.Gene1921997191198
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    1. Henner D. J.,
    2. Hoch J. A.
    The Bacillus subtilis chromosome.Microbiol. Rev.4419805782
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Itaya M.
    Stability and asymmetric replication of the Bacillus subtilis 168 chromosome structure.J. Bacteriol.1751993741749
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Itaya M.
    Integration of repeated sequences (pBR322) in the Bacillus subtilis 168 chromosome without affecting the genome structure.Mol. Gen. Genet.2411993287297
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Itaya M.
    Toward a bacterial genome technology: integration of the Escherichia coli prophage lambda genome into the Bacillus subtilis 168 chromosome.Mol. Gen. Genet.2481995916
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    1. Itaya M.,
    2. Tanaka T.
    Complete physical map of the Bacillus subtilis 168 chromosome constructed by a gene-directed mutagenesis method.J. Mol. Biol.2201991631648
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    1. Itaya M.,
    2. Tanaka T.
    Predicted and unsuspected alterations of the genome structure of genetically defined Bacillus subtilis 168 strains.Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem.6119975664
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    1. Itaya M.,
    2. Tanaka T.
    Experimental surgery to create subgenomes of Bacillus subtilis 168.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA94199753785382
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Kunst F.,
    2. Ogasawara N.,
    3. et al.
    The complete genome sequence of the gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis.Nature3901997249256
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    1. Lorenz M. G.,
    2. Wackernagel W.
    Bacterial gene transfer by natural genetic transformation in the environment.Microbiol. Rev.581994563602
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Miller J. H.
    Experiments in molecular genetics. 1972 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y
  18. 18.
    1. Miller R. V.
    Bacterial gene swapping in nature.Sci. Am.27819986671
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    1. Saito H.,
    2. Miura K.
    Preparation of transforming deoxyribonucleic acid by phenol treatment.Biochim. Biophys. Acta721963619629
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    1. Sambrook J.,
    2. Fritsch E. F.,
    3. Maniatis T.
    Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual 2nd ed. 1989 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y
  21. 21.
    1. Southern E. M.
    Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis.J. Mol. Biol.981975503517
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.
    1. Spizizen J.
    Transformation of biochemically deficient strains of Bacillus subtilis by deoxyribonucleate.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA44195810721078
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Tanaka T.,
    2. Kawano N.
    Cloning vehicles for the homologous Bacillus subtilis host-vector system.Gene101980131136
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    1. Toda T.,
    2. Tanaka T.,
    3. Itaya M.
    A method to invert DNA segments of the Bacillus subtilis 168 genome by recombination between two homologous sequences.Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem.601996773778
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Genetic Transfer of Large DNA Inserts to Designated Loci of the Bacillus subtilis 168 Genome
Mitsuhiro Itaya
Journal of Bacteriology Feb 1999, 181 (3) 1045-1048; DOI: 10.1128/JB.181.3.1045-1048.1999

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Bacteriology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Genetic Transfer of Large DNA Inserts to Designated Loci of the Bacillus subtilis 168 Genome
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Bacteriology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Bacteriology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Genetic Transfer of Large DNA Inserts to Designated Loci of the Bacillus subtilis 168 Genome
Mitsuhiro Itaya
Journal of Bacteriology Feb 1999, 181 (3) 1045-1048; DOI: 10.1128/JB.181.3.1045-1048.1999
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Bacillus subtilis
Gene Transfer Techniques
Genome, Bacterial
Mutagenesis, Insertional
Recombination, Genetic

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JB
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #Jbacteriology

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0021-9193; Online ISSN: 1098-5530