Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Bacteriology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Plant Microbiology

Varying the Abundance of O Antigen inRhizobium etli and Its Effect on Symbiosis withPhaseolus vulgaris

K. Dale Noel, Lennart S. Forsberg, Russell W. Carlson
K. Dale Noel
Department of Biology, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lennart S. Forsberg
Complex Carbohydrate Research Center, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Russell W. Carlson
Complex Carbohydrate Research Center, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JB.182.19.5317-5324.2000
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig. 1.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    SDS-PAGE comparison of relative amounts of LPS I and LPS II in strains CE166, CE166α, and wild-type CE3. SDS extracts of washed cell pellets were loaded to give roughly equal amounts of total LPS. The band that migrates faster than LPS II comigrates with purified lipid A. Lanes: 1, CE3; 2, CE166; 3, CE166α.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    The R. etli CE3 lps α andlps-166 genetic regions. The lps α locus is a contiguous stretch of DNA shown on the left. The dotted line indicates that lps-166 is separated from the lps α locus by an undetermined distance along the chromosome. Ticks on the upper line indicate the positions of EcoRI sites. The relative locations of the Tn5 insertions of four mutants in this study are indicated by arrows above this line. The lines below indicate stretches of DNA from lps α that are contained in the specified plasmids. The lps α DNA responsible for the suppression of lps-166 is located in the region indicated by the striped box.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    SDS-PAGE of SDS extracts of washed cell pellets of strains showing variation in LPS I content and the same strains after complementation with lps region α. Lanes: 1, wild-type CE3; 2, CE395; 3, CE395α; 4, CE394; 5, CE394α.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Proposed structure of LPS I of R. etli CE3 (16, 17). Features affected in mutants CE166 and CE395 are noted. Designation as O antigen is arbitrarily assigned to all contiguous residues released with the Kdo most distal to lipid A after mild hydrolysis that cleaves at Kdo residues (16, 23). Chemical analysis indicates that Fuc residues are only partially O-methylated at the positions shown (16). R, the various hydroxyfatty acyl groups that are ester- and amide-linked at the positions indicated in the lipid A portion; TOMFuc, tri-O-methylated Fuc; 3M6dTal, 3-O-methyl-6-deoxytalose; QuiNAc, N-acetylquinovosamine; GlcON, 2-aminogluconate. All other abbreviations are defined in Table2.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Table 1.

    Strains and plasmids used in this study

    Straina or plasmidbRelevant characteristic(s)Reference(s) or source
    Strains
     CE3R. etli wild-type LPS and symbiosis33
     CE166lps-166::Tn5, QuiN− LPS, low I/IIc10
     CE166αCE166 carrying pCOS109.11This work
     CE374lps-233::Tn532, 45
     CE394lps-394::Tn5, altered LPS and I/IIThis work
     CE394αCE394 carrying pCOS109.11This work
     CE395lps-395::Tn5, altered LPS and I/IIThis work
     CE395αCE395 carrying pCOS109.11This work
     CE408dmTn5SSgusA20in CE3This work
     CE433dmTn5SSgusA20in CE109 (lacks LPS I)This work
     CE434dmTn5SSgusA20in CE166This work
     CE436dmTn5SSgusA20in CE166αThis work
     CE451lps-166::Tn5 in CE3 by homogenotizationThis work
    Plasmids
     pCOS109.11R. etli CE3lps region α in 31-kb insert10, 29
     pDEL222-kb DNA from pCOS109.11 insert11
     pDEL2-314-kb DNA from pDEL2 insert11
     pDEL1416-kb DNA from pCOS109.11 insert11
     pDEL219-kb DNA from pCOS109.11 insert11
     pEQ166pJQ200 carrying the 11-kb lps-166::Tn5 EcoRI fragmentThis work
     pJQ200Vector for homogenotization; GmsacB40
    • ↵a Strain CE3 is a streptomycin-resistant derivative of R. etli nodule isolate CFN42 (33). All other strains were derived from CE3.

    • ↵b All R. etli DNA inserts, except in pEQ166, were carried in vector pLAFR1 (18).

    • ↵c I/II, LPS I/LPS II ratio. The apparent ratios of LPS I/LPS II of the strains decrease in the following order: CE3 and CE374 (equal ratios), CE395, CE166, CE394.

    • ↵d mTn5SSgusA20 was inserted at unknown locations after introduction into the respective parent strains on plasmid pCAM120 (47). These strains were used to compare extents of infection. Their LPS SDS-PAGE and symbiotic phenotypes were the same as those of respective parent strains (CE3, CE109, CE166, and CE166α) (data not shown).

  • Table 2.

    Sugar compositions of purified LPSs

    SugarbMolar ratioa found in strain:
    CE3CE166CE166αCE395
    QuiN0.6NDND0.4
    2OMe6Dhx0.90.40.8ND
    3OMe6Dhx2.91.32.51.6
    Fuc3.61.42.62.2
    GlcA3.01.72.41.9
    Man1.91.41.71.5
    Gal1.01.01.01.0
    GalA2.92.82.93.0
    Kdo2.11.92.2—
    GlcN0.80.90.90.9
    • ↵a Entries are molar ratios of the sugars normalized to 1.0 galactose. They are the mean values from five parallel analyses of CE3, CE166, and CE166α LPS and three additional parallel analyses of CE3 and CE166 LPS in two laboratories over the course of 10 years. In the data for these three strains, the average standard deviation of the mole ratios before normalization was 21% of the mean value. The CE395 data are mean values from two determinations. ND, not detected (<0.01); —, obscured by TMS methyl glycoside peaks due to residual EDTA in the CE395 LPS after Sepharose 4B chromatography.

    • ↵b The sugars in boldface type are found in the portion of the R. etli CE3 designated as the O antigen (16, 17). Abbreviations: 2OMe6Dhx, 2-O-methyl-6-deoxyhexose; 3OMe6Dhx, 3-O-methyl-6-deoxy hexose; Fuc, fucose; Man, mannose; Gal, galactose; GalA, galacturonic acid; GlcN, glucosamine. Migration with methylated standards indicates that 2OMe6Dhx and 3OMe6Dhx are 2-O-methyl-fucose and 3-O-methyl-6-deoxytalose, respectively, in strain CE3 (16) (Fig. 4).

  • Table 3.

    Symbiotic performance of complemented and suppressed strains

    Time and inoculantAR/plantaNodules/plantcSpecific ARb
    No.wt
    14 d.a.i.
     CE31006045100
     CE166α112710
     CE166αNd211616
     CE3742161011
     CE394α42452967
     CE395α36523253
    20 d.a.i.
     CE31006378100
     CE166e<0.1252<0.1
     CE166α29173959
    26 d.a.i.
     CE310068120100
     CE166e<0.160—f<0.1
     CE166α25187142
     CE374923188123
     CE395α11048123112
     CE394α12350125116
    • ↵a AR (acetylene reduction) normalized to values exhibited by strain CE3 (which is set to 100).

    • ↵b AR per total nodule fresh weight, expressed as percent of the wild-type value.

    • ↵c Number and total fresh weight (mg) of the nodules per plant.

    • ↵d An isolate from nodules of CE166α.

    • ↵e Representative of results with CE394 and CE395.

    • ↵f —, small pseudonodules (not weighed).

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Varying the Abundance of O Antigen inRhizobium etli and Its Effect on Symbiosis withPhaseolus vulgaris
K. Dale Noel, Lennart S. Forsberg, Russell W. Carlson
Journal of Bacteriology Oct 2000, 182 (19) 5317-5324; DOI: 10.1128/JB.182.19.5317-5324.2000

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Bacteriology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Varying the Abundance of O Antigen inRhizobium etli and Its Effect on Symbiosis withPhaseolus vulgaris
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Bacteriology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Bacteriology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Varying the Abundance of O Antigen inRhizobium etli and Its Effect on Symbiosis withPhaseolus vulgaris
K. Dale Noel, Lennart S. Forsberg, Russell W. Carlson
Journal of Bacteriology Oct 2000, 182 (19) 5317-5324; DOI: 10.1128/JB.182.19.5317-5324.2000
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Fabaceae
Glucosamine
Lipopolysaccharides
O antigens
Plants, Medicinal
Rhizobium

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JB
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #Jbacteriology

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0021-9193; Online ISSN: 1098-5530