Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Bacteriology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
PHYSIOLOGY AND METABOLISM

AcrD of Escherichia coli Is an Aminoglycoside Efflux Pump

Emiko Y. Rosenberg, Dzwokai Ma, Hiroshi Nikaido
Emiko Y. Rosenberg
Departments of Molecular and Cell Biology and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dzwokai Ma
Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hiroshi Nikaido
Departments of Molecular and Cell Biology and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JB.182.6.1754-1756.2000
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

AcrD, a transporter belonging to the resistance-nodulation-division family, was shown to participate in the efflux of aminoglycosides. Deletion of the acrD gene decreased the MICs of amikacin, gentamicin, neomycin, kanamycin, and tobramycin by a factor of two to eight, and ΔacrD cells accumulated higher levels of [3H]dihydrostreptomycin and [3H]gentamicin than did the parent strain.

Multidrug efflux pumps play an important role in establishing the intrinsic level of resistance of gram-negative bacteria to a number of agents (16, 17). Many of these pumps belong to the resistance-nodulation-division (RND) family, whose members have been known to pump out mostly lipophilic or amphiphilic molecules or toxic divalent cations (16, 19). The Escherichia coli genome contains several genes coding for RND transporters. Among these, acrB is constitutively expressed and is largely responsible for the intrinsic resistance ofE. coli to a very wide range of compounds, including lipophilic drugs, detergents (including bile salts), and dyes (8, 10, 18, 20). The gene acrF has a high degree of similarity to acrB (77% identity at the amino acid level, with no gaps) and is also expected to pump out a wide variety of lipophilic and amphiphilic agents. Indeed, AcrF overexpression strains can be isolated as suppressors of acrAB mutants (J. Xu, M. L. Nilles, and K. P. Bertrand, Abstr. 93rd Gen. Meet. Am. Soc. Microbiol. 1993, abstr. K-169, p. 290, 1993) and seem to have a resistance phenotype similar to that of theacrAB+ wild-type strain. However, disruption of the acrF gene in the wild-type strain does not produce a drug hypersusceptibility phenotype (8), suggesting thatacrF is weakly expressed in wild-type E. coli.

Disruption of the acrD gene also did not result in hypersusceptibility to lipophilic and amphiphilic drugs (8). However, recently RND-type transporters that pump out very hydrophilic compounds, aminoglycosides, have been observed in Burkholderia pseudomallei (13) and in Pseudomonas aeruginosa (1). Furthermore, comparison of the P. aeruginosa aminoglycoside efflux pump MexY sequence with open reading frames in the E. coli genome sequence using the gapped BLAST program (2) shows that AcrD has the highest similarity score at the amino acid level. In light of these findings, we have reexamined the drug susceptibility of an acrDdisruption mutant and found it to be hypersusceptible to a variety of aminoglycosides.

Deletion-insertion of the acrD gene was done as follows. Plasmid pBW7, which corresponds to vector pEMBL8(+) containing a 5.5-kb fragment of E. coli K-12 chromosome with the dapE(msgB) gene and the upstream acrD gene (21), was obtained from D. Ang. This plasmid was digested with ClaI (which cuts at position 710 of the acrDgene) and EcoRV (which cuts at position 2370), creating a deletion within acrD of 1,660 bp, and theAvaI-EcoRI fragment of pBR322 containing thetet gene was inserted in this interval. The plasmid was linearized and used to transform JC7623 [K-12 argE3 hisG4 leuB6 Δ(gpt-proA) thr-1 thi-1 ara-14 galK2 lacY1 mtl-1 xyl-1 kdgK51 tsx-33 recB21 recC22 sbcB15 supE44 rpsL31 rac] as previously described (9), and a tetracycline-resistant clone was isolated as JZM320. The disruption of the acrDgene was confirmed by PCR amplification using genomic DNA of both the parent JC7623 and JZM320.

The antibiotic susceptibility of JZM320 was determined by the serial twofold broth dilution method, first in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium (10 g of tryptone, 10 g of Bacto yeast extract, and 5 g of NaCl per liter). The inoculum was 104 cells per ml, and the results were read after overnight incubation at 37°C. Table1 shows that MICs of all the aminoglycosides tested were significantly decreased in the case of JZM320. MICs of streptomycin were not determined because of the presence of a ribosomal mutation, rpsL31, which makes the JC7623 strain highly resistant to this drug. MICs of erythromycin and polymyxin B were slightly but reproducibly decreased in JZM320. MICs of crystal violet, novobiocin, rifampin, chloramphenicol, carbenicillin, cefoxitin, nalidixic acid, norfloxacin, and ampicillin were not altered in a reproducible manner in JZM320, although in some experiments twofold differences were observed with some of the drugs. When the intact acrD+ allele was introduced by transforming JZM320 with plasmid pBW7, the aminoglycoside MICs returned to those for the parent strain, JC7623 (Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

MICs of various antibiotics

Aminoglycoside MICs are known to be influenced strongly by the nature of the medium used (12). When the same batch of LB medium was used, the MICs were reproducible, except that there were occasional twofold differences that are expected in twofold dilution assays. In contrast, when three lots each of Difco tryptone and Difco yeast extract were used to make LB broth, the absolute values of the gentamicin MIC for JC7623 varied up to sixfold, although the difference in MIC between JC7623 and JZM320 remained similar, four- to eightfold. (However, with one lot each of more recent Becton Dickinson-Difco ingredients, the difference between the gentamicin MICs for these two strains decreased to only twofold.) Since salts present in the medium are known to have a large influence on aminoglycoside susceptibility (3, 12), we also tested MICs in Difco nutrient broth, which contains very low concentrations of salts (only 11 mM Na+, 0.3 mM Mg2+, and 0.03 mM Ca2+, according to reference 12). In nutrient broth, both the parent and the mutant strains became much more susceptible to aminoglycosides, as reported earlier (3, 12). The absence of AcrD nevertheless produced similar changes in aminoglycoside susceptibility, making the ΔacrD mutant up to eightfold more susceptible to both amikacin and kanamycin. The addition of 5 mM MgCl2to the nutrient broth made both strains much more resistant to aminoglycosides (data not shown), as reported earlier for E. coli and P. aeruginosa (12). Because the constituents of complex media had a not-totally-predictable influence on aminoglycoside susceptibility, we also determined the MIC in a synthetic medium, MOPS (morpholinepropanesulfonic acid) medium (15), supplemented with required amino acids at 40 μg/ml. We confirmed that the ΔacrD mutant was more susceptible to aminoglycosides in this medium also (Table 1).

The accumulation kinetics of antibiotics, especially the steady-state level of accumulation, is a sensitive indicator of an active efflux process. Cells of JC7623 and JZM320 were grown in LB broth up to a density of about 109 cells/ml with aeration by shaking and were harvested and washed once at room temperature with a 50 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, containing 1 mM MgSO4 and 0.2% (wt/vol) glucose. The washed cells were resuspended in the same buffer at a density of 2 mg (dry weight) per ml. Aminoglycoside uptake was measured by preequilibrating 0.5 ml of the cell suspension for 10 min at 30°C with shaking and then removing 50-μl samples at various times after the addition of 3H-labeled aminoglycosides. The samples were immediately diluted into 1 ml of ice-cold 0.1 M LiCl–50 mM KPO4, pH 7.0, and the mixture was filtered on a 0.45-μm-pore-size Gelman GN6 Metricel membrane filter. The filter was quickly washed with 5 ml of the ice-cold LiCl-KPO4solution, dried, and used for determination of radioactivity in a Beckman liquid scintillation counter. The final concentrations of aminoglycosides used were 0.8 μM [3H]dihydrostreptomycin (20 Ci/mmol; American Radiolabeled Chemical, Inc., St. Louis, Mo.) and 10 μM for [3H]gentamicin (specific radioactivity, 200 mCi/g; American Radiolabeled Chemical). As shown in Fig.1A, at 20 min the accumulation level of dihydrostreptomycin in the ΔacrD mutant strain was about four times higher than that in the isogenic parent strain. Similar differences were also observed reproducibly for gentamicin (Fig. 1B). The accumulation levels of dihydrostreptomycin and gentamicin in theΔacrD strain (2.4 and 34 nmol/mg [dry weight], respectively) correspond to intracellular concentrations of about 0.8 and 11 μM, respectively, if we assume that 1 mg (dry weight) ofE. coli cells has a volume of 3 μl (14). Interestingly, this is very close to the external concentrations of aminoglycosides used, i.e., 0.8 and 10 μM, respectively, although it does not allow much room for accumulation against a concentration gradient or for drug binding to ribosomes.

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Accumulation of [3H]dihydrostreptomycin (A) and [3H]gentamicin (B) by E. coli cells resuspended in buffer containing glucose. Cells were incubated with 0.8 μM dihydrostreptomycin or 10 μM gentamicin, and the uptake of drugs by cells of JC7263 (parent) (■) and JZM 320 (ΔacrDmutant) (▴) was examined as described in the text.

With other multidrug efflux pumps, protonophores such as carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone have been used to abolish the energy supply for pumps and to show an increase in the level of accumulation (reviewed in reference 16). However, when this protonophore was added to the parent strain, only a minor increase in the aminoglycoside accumulation was seen (data not shown). Similarly, a protonophore-induced increase in aminoglycoside accumulation has not been reported in previous publications dealing with aminoglycoside efflux pumps (1, 13). This is most likely due to the fact that aminoglycoside entry into the cytoplasm requires membrane potential (4, 11), which is abolished by protonophores. Nevertheless, our data suggest that the difference in aminoglycoside accumulation between the acrD+and ΔacrD strains (Fig. 1) is due to the presence and absence of efflux rather than to differences in the drug permeability of the cytoplasmic membrane, because a slow, steadily increasing intracellular accumulation of aminoglycosides is predicted in the latter model (see Fig. 2A of reference 16), whereas low, steady-state levels of accumulation were clearly attained inacrD+ cells in our experiment (Fig. 1), as anticipated by the former model.

Aminoglycosides are usually thought to be taken up by bacterial cells in a two-phase process, with the slow, initial phase I uptake followed by a massive, rapid influx of drugs in phase II (4). Phase II uptake requires the aminoglycoside-induced inhibition of translation (and most likely misreading) (4). Since JC7263 and itsacrD derivative were resistant to the action of streptomycin and dihydrostreptomycin thanks to the rpsL mutation present, the absence of phase II uptake in the Fig. 1A experiment was expected. However, because the gentamicin concentration used in the Fig. 1B experiment was similar to its MIC (in the LB medium) for the parent strain, it was unexpected that the phase II uptake was not seen. This is most probably due to the inhibition of aminoglycoside uptake by the salts present in our assay media, which contained 1 mM MgSO4 and 50 mM phosphate buffer; Mg2+ at 1 mM is known to decrease streptomycin uptake by E. coli cells by more than 95%, and even 5.7 mM phosphate buffer is sufficient to decrease the uptake by 50% (3). In fact, many of the “two-phase” uptake curves were generated by using resuspension media with exceptionally low ionic strengths (3).

Other RND-type pump genes in E. coli usually occur together with the genes for membrane fusion protein (MFP) family members, such as acrA and acrE, and this fact suggests that the transporter forms a multisubunit assembly with a member of MFP and an outer membrane channel (presumably TolC, as shown in reference6), so that the pumped-out drug molecules do not accumulate in the periplasm (16). In contrast, theacrD gene is not associated with any gene coding for an MFP. There are at least two ways in which this genetic organization can be rationalized. (i) AcrD may become associated with a member of the MFP family and an outer membrane channel, both encoded elsewhere on the chromosome, to function as a part of the multisubunit transporter complex. (Indeed, the homologous MexY pump in P. aeruginosais encoded by a gene located next to the gene mexX, which codes for an MFP, and these two proteins were shown to work in association with an outer membrane channel, OprM [1].) Disruption of the tolC gene, coding for an important outer membrane channel (6), or disruption of acrA did not, however, make K-12 more susceptible to the aminoglycosides listed in Table 1 (data not shown). (ii) Most lipophilic and amphiphilic drugs can cross the cytoplasmic membrane barrier spontaneously. Thus, their accumulation in the periplasm accelerates the spontaneous reentry of the drugs into the cytoplasm. This is why it is critical for their efflux systems, such as AcrAB-TolC of E. coli, to have a multisubunit construction in order to pump out the drug molecules all the way into the medium. In contrast, aminoglycosides, owing to their hydrophilic structure and the presence of multiple positive charges, do not easily cross the cytoplasmic membrane. Indeed, their uptake usually requires high levels of membrane potential (5, 11) and has been proposed by some to utilize specific transport pathways (7). Thus, accumulation in the periplasm will not be as problematic for aminoglycosides as for lipophilic agents, and the AcrD protein perhaps can function without the participation of MFP and the outer membrane channels.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

D. Ma thanks J. E. Hearst for support and encouragement and M. Alberti for help in DNA sequencing.

This study was supported in part by U.S. Public Health Service grant AI-09644.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 14 October 1999.
    • Accepted 16 December 1999.
  • Copyright © 2000 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Aires J. R.,
    2. Köhler T.,
    3. Nikaido H.,
    4. Plésiat P.
    Involvement of an active efflux system in the natural resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to aminoglycosides.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.43199926242628
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Altschul S. F.,
    2. Madden T. L.,
    3. Schäffer A. A.,
    4. Zhang J.,
    5. Zhang Z.,
    6. Miller W.,
    7. Lipman D. J.
    Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs.Nucleic Acids Res.25199733893402
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Campbell B. D.,
    2. Kadner R. J.
    Relation of aerobiosis and ionic strength to the uptake of dihydrostreptomycin in Escherichia coli.Biochim. Biophys. Acta5931980110
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Davis B. D.
    Mechanism of bactericidal action of aminoglycosides.Microbiol. Rev.511987341350
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Fraimow H. S.,
    2. Greenman J. B.,
    3. Leviton I. M.,
    4. Dougherty T. J.,
    5. Miller M. H.
    Tobramycin uptake in Escherichia coli is driven by either electrical potential or ATP.J. Bacteriol.173199128002808
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Fralick J. A.
    Evidence that TolC is required for functioning of the Mar/AcrAB efflux pump of Escherichia coli.J. Bacteriol.178199658035805
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Kashiwagi K.,
    2. Tsuhako M. H.,
    3. Sakata K.,
    4. Saisho T.,
    5. Igarashi A.,
    6. Pinto da Costa S. O.,
    7. Igarashi K.
    Relationship between spontaneous aminoglycoside resistance in Escherichia coli and a decrease in oligopeptide binding protein.J. Bacteriol.180199854845488
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Ma D.,
    2. Cook D. N.,
    3. Alberti M.,
    4. Hearst J. E.,
    5. Nikaido H.
    Efflux pumps and drug resistance in gram-negative bacteria.Trends Microbiol.21994489493
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Ma D.,
    2. Cook D. N.,
    3. Alberti M.,
    4. Pon N. G.,
    5. Nikaido H.,
    6. Hearst J. E.
    Molecular cloning and characterization of acrA and acrE genes of Escherichia coli.J. Bacteriol.175199362996313
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Ma D.,
    2. Cook D. N.,
    3. Alberti M.,
    4. Pon N. G.,
    5. Nikaido H.,
    6. Hearst J. E.
    Genes acrA and acrB encode a stress-induced efflux system of Escherichia coli.Mol. Microbiol.1619954555
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Mates S. M.,
    2. Eisenberg E. S.,
    3. Mandel L. J.,
    4. Patel L.,
    5. Kaback H. R.,
    6. Miller M. H.
    Membrane potential and gentamicin uptake in Staphylococcus aureus.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA79198266936697
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Medeiros A. A.,
    2. O'Brien T. F.,
    3. Wacker W. E. C.,
    4. Yulug N. F.
    Effect of salt concentration on the apparent in-vitro susceptibility of Pseudomonas and other Gram-negative bacilli to gentamicin.J. Infect. Dis.1241971S59S64
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Moore R. A.,
    2. DeShazer D.,
    3. Reckseidler S.,
    4. Weissman A.,
    5. Woods D. E.
    Efflux-mediated aminoglycoside and macrolide resistance in Burkholderia pseudomallei.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.431999465470
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Mühlradt P. F.,
    2. Menzel J.,
    3. Golecki J. R.,
    4. Speth V.
    Lateral mobility and surface density of lipopolysaccharide in the outer membrane of Salmonella typhimurium.Eur. J. Biochem.431974533539
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Neidhardt F. C.,
    2. Bloch P. L.,
    3. Smith D. F.
    Culture medium for enterobacteria.J. Bacteriol.1191974736747
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Nikaido H.
    Multidrug efflux pumps of gram-negative bacteria.J. Bacteriol.178199658535859
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Nikaido H.
    Multiple antibiotic resistance and efflux.Curr. Opin. Microbiol.11998516523
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    1. Okusu H.,
    2. Ma D.,
    3. Nikaido H.
    AcrAB efflux pump plays a major role in the antibiotic resistance phenotype of Escherichia coli multiple-antibiotic-resistance (Mar) mutants.J. Bacteriol.1781996306308
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Saier M. H. Jr.,
    2. Tam R.,
    3. Reizer A.,
    4. Reizer J.
    Two novel families of bacterial membrane proteins concerned with nodulation, cell division and transport.Mol. Microbiol.111994841847
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    1. Thanassi D. G.,
    2. Cheng L. W.,
    3. Nikaido H.
    Active efflux of bile salts by Escherichia coli.J. Bacteriol.179199725122518
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Wu B.,
    2. Georgopoulos C.,
    3. Ang D.
    The essential Escherichia coli msgB gene, a multicopy suppressor of a temperature-sensitive allele of the heat shock gene grpE, is identical to dapE.J. Bacteriol.174199252585264
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
AcrD of Escherichia coli Is an Aminoglycoside Efflux Pump
Emiko Y. Rosenberg, Dzwokai Ma, Hiroshi Nikaido
Journal of Bacteriology Mar 2000, 182 (6) 1754-1756; DOI: 10.1128/JB.182.6.1754-1756.2000

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Bacteriology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
AcrD of Escherichia coli Is an Aminoglycoside Efflux Pump
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Bacteriology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Bacteriology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
AcrD of Escherichia coli Is an Aminoglycoside Efflux Pump
Emiko Y. Rosenberg, Dzwokai Ma, Hiroshi Nikaido
Journal of Bacteriology Mar 2000, 182 (6) 1754-1756; DOI: 10.1128/JB.182.6.1754-1756.2000
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Anti-Bacterial Agents
Carrier Proteins
Escherichia coli
Escherichia coli Proteins
Membrane Transport Proteins

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JB
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #Jbacteriology

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0021-9193; Online ISSN: 1098-5530