Mobilization of Plasmids and Chromosomal DNA Mediated by the SXT Element, a Constin Found in Vibrio cholerae O139

RSF1010 is mobilized by the SXT element.RSF1010 is a broad-host-range plasmid that can be mobilized by conjugative plasmids, the chromosomal dot-icm virulence system of Legionella pneumophila, and the plasmid-encoded vir system ofAgrobacterium tumefaciens (3, 9, 25, 29). Because RSF1010 encodes resistance to sulfonamide and streptomycin, as does the SXT element, we used an RSF1010 derivative containing a kanamycin resistance cassette, RSF1010-Kn (29), to test whetherE. coli K-12 harboring the SXT element could mobilize RSF1010. Donor strains for these conjugation experiments were theE. coli K-12 MG1655 derivatives CAG18439 (27) and HW220 (CAG18439 prfC::SXT element [14]), both transformed with RSF1010-Kn. BI533, a spontaneous nalidixic acid-resistant mutant of MG1655, was used as a recipient. Matings were performed as previously described (14), and exconjugants were selected on Luria-Bertani (LB) agar containing 50 mg of kanamycin per liter, and 40 mg of nalidixic acid (NAL) per liter for RSF1010-Kn transfer and LB agar with 40 mg of NAL per liter, 160 mg of sulfamethoxazole per liter, and 32 mg of trimethoprim per liter for SXT element transfer. CAG18439 did not mobilize RSF1010. However, when its SXT^r derivative HW220 was used as a donor, Kn^r exconjugants were obtained with a frequency of 10⁻⁷ (Table 1). This frequency was about 100-fold lower than the frequency of SXT element transfer from this strain (Table 1). Only 10% of the Kn^r exconjugants were also resistant to SXT. The presence of RSF1010-Kn in the exconjugants was confirmed by plasmid isolation (data not shown). Thus, in most cases the SXT element and RSF1010 were transferred independently. These results indicate that RSF1010 is mobilized in trans by the SXT element, rather than through formation of a cointegrate between the two elements.

Since the int gene of the SXT element is required for excision and self-transfer of the element, we constructed a null mutation in int to test whether SXT element-mediated transfer of RSF1010 requires the activity of this protein. Theint bp 305 to 1025 were deleted with aClaI/NsiI digest followed by intramolecular ligation, and the intΔ305–1025 allele was cloned into the allele-exchange vector pWM91 (19), resulting in pINTΔ91. Allelic exchange was performed in HW220 as previously described (7), and an HW220Δint derivative, BI554, was isolated. Like HW514 (14), a previously described HW220 derivative with an insertion mutation in int, BI554 did not contain an extrachromosomal circular form of the SXT element detectable by PCR or transfer the SXT element to a recipient. However, BI554 could still mediate transfer of RSF1010-Kn to BI533 at nearly the same frequency as that of the int⁺ strain HW220 (Table 1). This indicates that the conjugative functions of the SXT element are not dependent upon a functional intgene. Therefore, excision and circularization of the SXT element are not required for expression of the SXT element-encoded transfer functions. This result also confirms that transfer of RSF1010 is not dependent on transfer of the SXT element.

To test whether the RSF1010-encoded oriT is required for its mobilization by the SXT element, we transformed CAG18439, CAG18439/RP4, HW220, and BI554 with a derivative of RSF1010-Kn carrying a 124-bp deletion extending over the oriT region (deletion Δ13 [10, 29]). As expected, CAG18439 and CAG18439 carrying RP4 could not transfer RSF1010ΔoriT. However, to our surprise, HW220 was still able to mobilize this plasmid with a frequency similar to that of RSF1010-Kn (Table 1). This indicates an alternative route of RSF1010 transfer independent of theoriT region. Mob-independent transfer of plasmids has been described for other conjugative elements like Tn916(26), but the mechanism is not understood. Transfer of the RSF1010ΔoriT was dependent neither on cointegrate formation between the SXT element and RSF1010ΔoriT nor on recombinational repair of the oriT deletion in this plasmid by SXT element sequences. These mechanisms were excluded by our findings that, in all exconjugants tested, RSF1010ΔoriTcould be isolated as a plasmid and that the oriT deletion was still present (data not shown). Furthermore, as in the previous experiment, only about 10% of the exconjugants received both the RSF1010ΔoriT and the SXT element. The intmutant BI554 was also able to mediate transfer of RSF1010ΔoriT, although with a lower frequency than HW220 (Table 1).

The SXT element can mobilize CloDF13.To investigate whether the SXT element can also mediate the transfer of other mobilizable plasmids, we transformed CAG18439 and HW220 with pSU4628 (CloDF13::TnAΔEcoRV Ap^r[4]), pSU4601 (ColE1::Kn [4]), and pSU4620 (ColE3::Kn [4]). Matings were performed using BI533 as a recipient, and exconjugants were selected on LB agar with NAL and ampicillin (100 mg/liter) and LB plates with NAL and kanamycin, respectively (Table 1). In each experiment, SXT element transfer was also monitored. As a positive control, we used a CAG18439 derivative harboring RP4 as a donor strain and could show plasmid transfer in all cases (data not shown). As expected, CAG18439 alone could not mediate transfer of any of these plasmids. In contrast, with HW220 as the donor we could detect transfer of pSU4628 (CloDF13) but not of pSU4601 (ColE1) or pSU4620 (ColE3). None of 100 tested Ap^rexconjugants containing pSU4628 showed resistance to SXT, indicating that cotransfer of the SXT element with pSU4628 did not occur or occurred only at a low frequency.

As was the case for SXT element-mediated transfer of RSF1010, transfer of pSU4628 was independent of the SXT element-encoded int. The int mutant BI554 donated pSU4628 to recipient cells at approximately the same frequency as did the int⁺HW220 (Table 1). Interestingly, both pSU4628 and pSU4620 influenced the SXT element transfer frequency (Table 1). With pSU4628, there was a 10-fold reduction in the transfer frequency of the SXT element. This could at least partly account for our inability to detect cotransfer of the SXT element with pSU4628. pSU4620 (ColE3), even though it was not mobilized by the SXT element, also interfered with the SXT element transfer, as no SXT^r exconjugants could be isolated in these matings. Inhibition of F transfer by a copy number mutant of CloDF13 has been attributed to a reduction of the level of TraD (31). A similar mechanism might account for the reduced frequency of SXT element transfer in the presence of either pSU4628 or pSU4620. A study by Cabezón et al. (4) showed that it is primarily the TraD (in F)-TraG (in RP4) protein family that mediates the coupling between the respective conjugation systems and the mobilizable plasmids. CloDF13 encodes its own TraG homologue, but pSU4601 and pSU4620 do not. This difference could account for the efficient mobilization of CloDF13 by the SXT element and the failure to mobilize pSU4601 or pSU4620.

The SXT element can mobilize chromosomal DNA in an Hfr-like manner.We tested whether the SXT element can, in addition, mobilize chromosomal DNA in cis. To accomplish this, we moved the SXT element into a set of MG1655 derivatives carrying single Tn10 (Tc^r) or Tn10kan(Kn^r) insertions at different sites on the chromosome (27). The Tn10 insertions were chosen to be upstream and downstream of the SXT element insertion site inprfC, which is located at 99.3 min on the E. coliK-12 chromosome (2). We found that Tn10insertions downstream of prfC in donor strains BI722 (0 min), BI723 (5.6 min), and HW220 (7.9 min) could be donated to a recipient if the SXT element was integrated at prfC (Fig.1). Transfer of Tn10 was absolutely dependent on the presence of the SXT element in the donor strains (Fig. 1), and no transposition of Tn10 was evident in the exconjugants. Like their respective donor strains, exconjugants derived from BI722 were threonine auxotrophs, and the exconjugants derived from BI723 were proline auxotrophs. Similarly, 98% of 100 tested exconjugants derived from HW220 were LacZ⁻ (white on plates containing 0.02% 5-bromo-4-chloro-indolyl-β-d-galactoside), indicating cotransfer of the lacZU118 allele along with thelacI42::Tn10 to the recipient strain.

• Open in new tab
• Download powerpoint

Fig. 1.

Mobilization of chromosomal DNA by the SXT element. The transfer frequency was calculated by dividing the number of exconjugant cells by the number of donor cells. All donor strains are derivatives of E. coli K-12 MG1655. Locations of the Tn10insertions in the donor strains were determined by Singer et al. (27) and Nichols et al. (20). ND, not done.

In contrast to Tn10 insertions downstream ofprfC, the two Tn10 insertions upstream ofprfC in donor strains BI646 (90.3 min) and BI647 (98.25 min) could not be transferred by the SXT element. The lack of detectable transfer from insertions upstream of prfC suggests that imprecise excision of the SXT element, as seen with specialized transducing phages or an F′ plasmid, does not constitute the mechanism of transfer of chromosomal DNA by this element. Instead, it appears that the SXT element mobilizes chromosomal DNA in a directional manner, similar to Hfr mobilization of chromosomal DNA. To investigate this further, we carried out conjugation experiments using HW220 as a donor and a Nal^r derivative of AB1157 [E. coli K-12;thr-1, leuB6Δ(gpt-proA)62 (1)] as a recipient and selected for Tc^r(lacI::Tn10) AB1157 (Nal^r) exconjugants. The frequency of cotransfer of the thrABC,leuB, and proA alleles of HW220 to AB1157 was determined (Fig. 2). These frequencies were dependent on the distance of these markers relative to the selected marker (lacI::Tn10). Thus, Tc^r AB1157 exconjugants were proline auxotrophs more frequently than leucine or threonine auxotrophs, respectively (Fig. 2). These data indicate that the transferred DNA is integrated by homologous recombination into the recipient's chromosome. Additional evidence that the mechanism of SXT element-mediated transfer of chromosomal DNA is Hfr-like and dependent on homologous recombination was the finding that transfer of Tn10 markers to recipients was RecA dependent. When we compared the transfer frequency of lacI::Tn10kan from HW1110 (MG1655 lacI::Tn10kan prfC::SXT element) to either MC4100 or MC4100recA, we found that the Tn10kan insertion inlacI could not be transferred successfully to therecA mutant of MC4100 (Fig. 1). In contrast, RecA is not required in the recipient for SXT element transfer (Fig. 1).

• Open in new tab
• Download powerpoint

Fig. 2.

Frequency of cotransfer of unselected markers. The relative organization and map locations of the genes prfC(SXT element integration site), thrABC, leuB,proA, and lacI on the E. coli K-12 chromosome are depicted. Matings were performed with HW220 (lacI::Tn10 prfC::SXT element) as donor and AB1157 Nal^r as recipient cells. Exconjugants (which had obtained Tn10) were selected as Nal^r Tc^r CFU and subsequently scored for the presence of functional thrABC, leuB, andproA alleles. The frequency of cotransfer ofthrABC, leuB, and proA along withlacI::Tn10 is given as a percentage (bottom line).

Chromosomal DNA transfer mediated by the SXT element, like transfer of plasmids by this element, appears to be independent of transfer of the element itself. Only a fraction of the Tn10-containing exconjugants derived from BI722, BI723, and HW220 were also SXT^r (41, 36, and 14%, respectively). Also, BI554, the Δint derivative of HW220, was capable of donating thelacI::Tn10 to the recipient. In fact, the frequency of transfer of lacI::Tn10was even higher from BI554 than from HW220 (Fig. 1), suggesting that transfer of the SXT element DNA may interfere with transfer of chromosomal DNA.

Conclusions.In this study, we found that the gene transfer capacity of the SXT element goes beyond its self-transfer. InE. coli K-12, we showed that the SXT element also mobilizes certain plasmids in trans and transfers chromosomal DNA in a directional fashion in cis. These findings confirm that conjugation is the mechanism of SXT element transfer. However, as a conjugative gene transfer system, the SXT element has distinct features compared with conjugative plasmids and conjugative transposons. First, compared to other known conjugation systems in gram-negative bacteria (4), the SXT element transfer system is more selective and less efficient with regard to the plasmids it can mobilize. Second, the SXT element mobilized RSF1010 in an oriT-independent manner. As we excluded cointegrate formation between RSF1010 and the SXT element, other mechanisms must account for this oriT-independent mobilization of RSF1010. One possibility is that either the SXT element or the RSF1010 MobA can recognize and nick a different RSF1010 sequence that can serve as an alternative origin of transfer. Since other conjugative transfer systems such as RP4 (10) and the icm-dot system (29) cannot mobilize an oriT-deleted RSF1010, it seems more likely that an alternative oriT is recognized by an SXT element-encoded nickase rather than by the RSF1010 MobA. It is also possible that SXT element-mediated transfer of RSF1010 proceeds via a mechanism independent of an oriT and results in the transfer of a double-stranded plasmid to recipient cells. If such a process occurs, there must be some specific interaction between the SXT element-encoded conjugative machinery and RSF1010, because we did not observe transfer of other mobilizable plasmids like pSU4601 and pSU4620. We are currently investigating which sequences of RSF1010 and the SXT element are required for this unexpectedoriT-independent transfer of RSF1010.

We found that the SXT element int is not required for mobilization of plasmids or chromosomal DNA. Thus, similar to integrated conjugative plasmids such as F (8), but unlike other obligate integrated elements such as Tn916(5), the expression of SXT element transfer functions is not dependent on its excision. For Tn916, the most thoroughly studied conjugative transposon of gram-positive bacteria, excision is required for expression of the transposon-encoded transfer functions (5). However, the transfer frequency of Tn916 is not determined by its frequency of excision, indicating that other factors in addition to excision regulate transfer of this conjugative transposon (18). The coupling of excision and transfer could explain why transfer of chromosomal DNA has not been reported for Tn916. It will be interesting to see whether other constins, such as CTnscr94 from enterobacteria (13), Tn5276 from Lactococcus lactis (21), the clc element from Pseudomonas putida (22), theMesorhizobium loti symbiosis island (28), and the Tc^r elements (24), will also be found to be capable of transfer of chromosomal DNA in a manner similar to the SXT element.

Transfer of linked chromosomal DNA by the SXT element may be an important mechanism of cross-species gene transfer. Presumably, any DNA sequence within about 500 kbp of the 3′ end of prfC could be mobilized by the SXT element. In the era of sequenced microbial genomes, this large stretch of DNA can be examined in a number of bacterial species to identify genes that could have been mobilized by the SXT element. For example, we wondered whether the wfbgene cluster, which is thought to be horizontally transmitted inV. cholerae populations (16), is closely linked to the V. cholerae prfC. This turned out not to be the case, as the wfb region maps about 460 kbp 5′ of prfC. Therefore, it seems unlikely that the SXT element played a role in the mobilization of the O139 wfb cluster from some donor strain into an El Tor V. cholerae O1 strain to give rise toV. cholerae O139. However, the V. choleraepathogenicity island, which encodes TCP pili, maps only about 200 kbp 3′ of prfC. Although the entire V. choleraepathogenicity island has recently been reported to be self-transmissible as a bacteriophage (17), the SXT element could provide an alternative pathway for mobilization of this virulence gene cluster. Similarly, the S. enterica serovar Typhimurium pathogenicity island encoding SigE, a factor required for invasion of host cells, is located at about 25 min (15). We were able to transfer a marked version of sigE at a very low frequency, in an SXT element-dependent fashion between S. entericaserovar Typhimurium strains (our unpublished results). This raises the possibility that the SXT element or perhaps similar constins may play a role in the mobilization of pathogenicity islands (whose mechanism of mobility is generally not understood) as well as other chromosomally encoded virulence genes. Finally, the SXT element may be a useful tool for mobilization of linked chromosomal genes in bacterial species likeV. cholerae where there are currently no Hfr-like elements available. The expanded potential of bacteria harboring the SXT element to engage in horizontal gene transfer may be an explanation for the widespread dissemination of the SXT element and similar elements in bacterial populations.