Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Bacteriology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
GENETICS AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY

New Plasmid System To Select forSaccharomyces cerevisiae Purine-Cytosine Permease Affinity Mutants

Renaud Wagner, Marie-Laure Straub, Jean-Luc Souciet, Serge Potier, Jacky de Montigny
Renaud Wagner
Laboratoire de Microbiologie et de Génétique, ESA 7010 Université Louis Pasteur/CNRS, Institut de Botanique, F-67083 Strasbourg Cedex, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marie-Laure Straub
Laboratoire de Microbiologie et de Génétique, ESA 7010 Université Louis Pasteur/CNRS, Institut de Botanique, F-67083 Strasbourg Cedex, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean-Luc Souciet
Laboratoire de Microbiologie et de Génétique, ESA 7010 Université Louis Pasteur/CNRS, Institut de Botanique, F-67083 Strasbourg Cedex, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Serge Potier
Laboratoire de Microbiologie et de Génétique, ESA 7010 Université Louis Pasteur/CNRS, Institut de Botanique, F-67083 Strasbourg Cedex, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jacky de Montigny
Laboratoire de Microbiologie et de Génétique, ESA 7010 Université Louis Pasteur/CNRS, Institut de Botanique, F-67083 Strasbourg Cedex, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JB.183.14.4386-4388.2001
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The FCY2 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiaeencodes a purine-cytosine permease (PCP) that mediates the active transport of purines and cytosine. A structure-function model for this PCP has been recently proposed. In this study, we developed a plasmid-based system that generated a number of affinity-mutated alleles, enabling us to define new amino acids critical for permease function.

Design of a plasmid system for the selection of PCP affinity mutants.In the yeastSaccharomyces cerevisiae, adenine (ADE), guanine (GUA), hypoxanthine (HYP), and cytosine (CYT) are taken up with the same affinity by a single proton symporter purine-CYT permease (PCP) encoded by the FCY2 gene (4, 9, 12, 13). Disruption of this gene abolishes active transport, despite the presence in the yeast genome of FCY21 and FCY22 (accession numberX97346 ), which belong to the same gene family. Several mutants with modified uptake abilities have been selected in vivo (2, 4, 6), and their analysis has led to the generation of a functional model for this permease (7).

To test this model and to investigate further the structure-function relationship of the PCP, we isolated additional fcy2affinity mutant alleles by various types of in vivo positive selection, making use of the broad specificity of this permease. PCP affinity mutants were isolated as previously described (4), by selecting cells able to overcome growth inhibition due to the outcompetition of two of the PCP substrates for entry into the cell. Two strains were constructed, RW123 (Δfcy2::HIS3 ade1-1 his3Δ200 trp1Δ [pPZ1-7 FCY2 TRP1]) and RW126 (Δfcy2::HIS3 ura29-15-30his3Δ200 trp1Δ [pPZ1-7 FCY2 TRP1]), in which the FCY2 coding sequence was replaced with theHIS3 marker as previously described (1) and the wild-type FCY2 allele was carried on the pPZ1-7 single-copy plasmid (2). Both were used for selection with various pairs of substrates (Table 1). The presence of a plasmid-borne FCY2 allele made it easier to clone and sequence the selected mutations.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Selection of PCP affinity mutants

Due to its ade1-1 mutation, strain RW123 was auxotrophic for ADE and therefore required efficient ADE uptake by the PCP for growth. When this strain was plated on YNB medium containing a low concentration of ADE and a high concentration of another substrate of the PCP, the competition between the two bases prevented the uptake of sufficient quantities of ADE, leading to growth inhibition. This growth inhibition was achieved by adding ADE at 3 μg · ml−1 to the medium along with CYT at 400 μg · ml−1 or 5-methylcytosine (5MeC) at 200 μg · ml−1 as a competitor. The use of these two competitors defined two selection schemes, facilitating the selection of CYT-resistant (CYTr) and 5MeC-resistant (5MeCr) mutants, respectively.

Strain RW126, which carried the ura29-15-30mutant allele, required an exogenous pyrimidine source, such as CYT, for growth. Thus, CYT at 3 μg · ml−1 was added to the medium as the limiting substrate and the competitor was ADE, HYP, GUA, or 5MeC. Competition conditions were achieved at the following concentrations: 150 μg · ml−1 for ADE, 150 μg · ml−1 for HYP, 60 μg · ml−1 for GUA, and 200 μg · ml−1 for 5MeC. Thus, based on the use of these four competitors, we were able to define four selection schemes, facilitating the selection of ADEr, HYPr, GUAr, and 5MeCr mutants, respectively.

Selection of affinity mutants.Five hundred five independent mutants obtained from 821 rounds of selection were retained for further analysis. Fifty-eight contained a mutation in the plasmid-borneFCY2 gene; 50 were selected by competition between ADE and CYT in strain RW123(pPZ1-7); and 8 were selected by competition between CYT and 5MeC in strain RW126(pPZ1-7). The remaining 447 mutants displayed chromosomal mutations. Four of the six selection systems used did not generate plasmid mutations (Table 1).

The sequences of the 58 plasmid-borne mutant fcy2 alleles defined eight classes of mutations (Table2). Five of these classes corresponded to single missense mutations (paC-A, paC-B, and pcM-A to -C), and three corresponded to extensive nucleotide replacements resulting in several amino acid changes (paC-C, pcM-D, and pcM-E). We assessed substrate uptake in the mutants to determine the kinetic parameters of transport Vmax (maximal rate of uptake) andKtapp (apparent Michaelis constant of transport) for the various substrates of the PCP (Table 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Amino acid substitutions and kinetic parameters (Ktapp and Vmax) of products of mutated FCY2 allelesa

Single missense mutations in the S369-to-N377 segment.Four of the five single missense mutations affected a short peptide segment of the PCP, from serine 369 (S369) to asparagine 377 (N377), corresponding to a hydrophilic external loop of the PCP (7) (Fig.1). Three of these mutations corresponded to amino acid substitutions not previously found (S369F, T370N, and N377T). For these three substitutions, the Ktappfor ADE was close to the value obtained with a wild-type strain but theKtapp was significantly higher than that of the wild-type strain for CYT, HYP, and GUA.

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Positions of selected amino acid substitutions in the PCP model proposed by Ferreira et al. (7).

In the T370N mutant, these changes were also accompanied by a general decrease in Vmax values (by a minimum factor of 2 for ADE and a maximum of 20 for GUA), suggesting that the amino acid substitution also slowed down the overall transport process. In contrast, the N377I substitution obtained by this approach and in a previous study (2) led to a large increase in allKtapp values (by factors of 13, 16, 10, and 17 for ADE, CYT, HYP, and GUA, respectively) and theVmax for CYT was also significantly higher than that of the wild type (about seven times as high).

These four point mutations in the S369-to-N377 segment accounted for more than 80% of the selected clones, indicating the important role played by this short peptide segment in the permease activity. These new results and the I371, N374, I375, P376, and N377 substitutions previously studied (2, 6, 8) clearly show that this region is involved in maintaining the PCP in a functional configuration, probably playing an active part in the conformational changes needed for solute translocation. In particular, asparagine 377 is thought to play an essential role in the solute-binding site, which is consistent with our results, because more than 70% of the selected mutations (41 of 58) affected this residue.

Modification of the G280 residue.Replacement of the glycine at position 280 with an alanine (G280A) resulted in a global increase in Ktapp values for all substrates (by a factor of six to seven) and in a similar decrease inVmax values, except for CYT. These strong effects on global uptake parameters indicate that glycine 280 is involved in the transport process. Moreover, considering the weak structural change responsible for these strong effects (basically, replacement of a hydrogen atom with a methyl group), glycine 280 has to be strongly conserved for maintenance of PCP activity.

This residue is located in a hydrophilic external loop, adjacent to that containing the S369-to-N377 segment (7) (Fig. 1). It therefore seems likely that these two predicted loops are involved in the correct folding of the protein and/or the establishment of the active site. This is consistent with the results of a recent study (7) that identified residue S372, located in the same region as G280, as a potential intragenic suppressor of the N374I substitution.

Multimutated alleles.Three plasmid mutants showed multiple missense mutations in the fcy2 sequence. The region mutated depended on the allele: 17 mutations led to four amino acid substitutions for the paC-C allele, 17 mutations led to three amino acid substitutions for pcM-D, and 37 mutations led to six amino acid substitutions for pcM-E. These mutated regions displayed sequences identical to that of FCY22, strongly suggesting that ectopic recombination had occurred between the plasmid-borne FCY2allele and the FCY22 gene. The recombinant sequences were 100 to 400 bp in size, and all surrounded the region encoding the hydrophilic S369-to-N377 segment. The three alleles had three substitutions in common: I371V, I375V, and N377G. Previous site-directed mutagenesis experiments (2) showed that the mutant phenotype resulted principally from the N377G substitution. As the FCY21 gene encodes an asparagine residue at this position, we believe that recombination between this duplicated gene and FCY2 may well occur but cannot result in the mutant phenotype.

The effects on substrate uptake parameters were similar in the three mutants: ADE incorporation was not affected, theKtapp for CYT was about 10 times higher than that in the wild type, that for HYP was 6 to 9 times higher, and that for GUA was also significantly higher. However, the increase inKtapp for GUA depended on the size of the mutated sequence, from a sixfold increase for paC-C to an increase of more than 40-fold for the largest mutated allele, pcM-E. This size-dependent modification indicated that one or more of the additional amino acid replacements was responsible for further functional changes in GUA uptake, suggesting that other features of the structure-function relationship are important.

General considerations.All of the mutations selected in this work and in previous studies affect hydrophilic segments predicted to be external or cytoplasmic; none affect hydrophobic regions. Consistent with recent studies of bacterial and fungal nucleobase transporter mutants with altered substrate specificity (5, 11), this strongly suggests that discrimination among the four substrates of the PCP probably occurs during the binding step, which is then followed by a common translocation process. Moreover, a global decrease in apparent affinity for CYT, GUA, and HYP was observed for all of the selected mutations, suggesting that the structural discriminants involved in ADE recognition differ from those for CYT, GUA, and HYP binding. Thus, every uptake modification for one of these three molecules should lead to a similar effect for the other two. This observation may account for the results of some of the screenings, involving affinity decoupling between CYT and GUA, or between CYT and HYP, in which PCP mutants were not isolated in our selection scheme.

Only about 10% of the mutants selected with this approach bore an expected mutant plasmid-borne fcy2 allele (58 of 505). Thus, most of the mutations selected corresponded to chromosomal loci. It would be of great interest to study these mutations, as they reflect a significant adaptive response to major substrate variations. For instance, some of these mutants may result from the functional modification of other transporters, as has been observed in similar studies: during selection for suppressors that restored potassium uptake in Δtrk1 Δtrk2 cells, unusual gain-of-function mutations were characterized in various transporters, such as amino acid permeases Bap2 and Hip1, glucose transporters Hxt1 and Hxt3, and glucose-galactose transporter Gal2 (10, 14).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was supported by a grant from the French Ministère de l'Education Nationale, de la Recherche et de la Technologie (95-5-11550).

We thank Thierry Ferreira, Daniel Brèthes, and Jean Chevallier for help with the transport assays and for helpful comments on this work. We also thank Catherine Spehner for technical assistance.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 12 February 2001.
    • Accepted 19 April 2001.
  • Copyright © 2001 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Baudin A.,
    2. Ozier-Kalogeropoulos O.,
    3. Denouel A.,
    4. Lacroute F.,
    5. Cullin C.
    A simple and efficient method for direct gene deletion in S. cerevisiae.Nucleic Acids Res.21199333293330
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Bloch J. C.,
    2. Sychrova H.,
    3. Souciet J. L.,
    4. Jund R.,
    5. Chevallier M. R.
    Determination of a specific region of the purine-cytosine permease involved in the recognition of its substrates.Mol. Microbiol.6199229892997
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.
    1. Brèthes D.,
    2. Chirio M. C.,
    3. Napias C.,
    4. Chevallier M. R.,
    5. Lavie J. L.,
    6. Chevallier J.
    In vivo and in vitro studies of the purine-cytosine permease of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Eur. J. Biochem.2041992699704
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    1. Chevallier M. R.,
    2. Jund R.,
    3. Lacroute F.
    Characterization of cytosine permeation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.J. Bacteriol.1221975629641
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Diallinas G.,
    2. Valdez J.,
    3. Sophianopolou V.,
    4. Rosa A.,
    5. Scazzocchio C.
    Chimeric protein analysis reveals a region involved in function and specificity of purine transporters in the filamentous fungus Aspergillus nidulans conserved in bacteria, plants and metazoans.EMBO J.17199838273837
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Ferreira T.,
    2. Brèthes D.,
    3. Pinson B.,
    4. Napias C.,
    5. Chevallier J.
    Functional analysis of mutated purine-cytosine permease from Saccharomyces cerevisiae.J. Biol. Chem.272199796979702
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Ferreira T.,
    2. Chevallier J.,
    3. Paumard P.,
    4. Napias C.,
    5. Brèthes D.
    Screening of an intragenic second-site suppressor of purine-cytosine permease from Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Eur. J. Biochem.26019992230
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    1. Ferreira T.,
    2. Napias C.,
    3. Chevallier J.,
    4. Brèthes D.
    Evidence for a dynamic role for proline 376 in the purine-cytosine permease of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Eur. J. Biochem.26319995764
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Hopkins P.,
    2. Chevallier M. R.,
    3. Jund R.,
    4. Eddy A. A.
    Use of plasmid vectors to show that the uracil and cytosine permeases of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae are electrogenic proton symports.FEMS Microbiol. Lett.491988173177
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. 10.↵
    1. Liang H.,
    2. Ko C. H.,
    3. Herman T.,
    4. Gaber R. F.
    Trinucleotide insertions, deletions, and point mutations in glucose transporters confer K+ uptake in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Mol. Cell. Biol.181998926935
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Meintanis C.,
    2. Karagouni A. D.,
    3. Diallinas G.
    Amino acid residues N450 and Q449 are critical for the uptake capacity and specificity of UapA, a prototype of a universally conserved nucleobase-ascorbate transporter family.Mol. Membr. Biol.1720004758
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Pinson B.,
    2. Pillois X.,
    3. Brèthes D.,
    4. Chevallier J.,
    5. Napias C.
    In vivo phosphorylation of the purine/cytosine permease from the plasma membrane of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Eur. J. Biochem.2391996439444
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    1. Reichert U.,
    2. Forêt M.
    Energy coupling in hypoxanthine transport of yeast. Potentiometric evidence of proton symport and potassium antiport.FEBS Lett.831977325328
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Wright M. B.,
    2. Ramos J.,
    3. Gomez M. J.,
    4. Moulder C.,
    5. Scherrer M.,
    6. Munson G.,
    7. Gaber R. F.
    Potassium transport by amino acid permeases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.J. Biol. Chem.27219971364713652
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
New Plasmid System To Select forSaccharomyces cerevisiae Purine-Cytosine Permease Affinity Mutants
Renaud Wagner, Marie-Laure Straub, Jean-Luc Souciet, Serge Potier, Jacky de Montigny
Journal of Bacteriology Jul 2001, 183 (14) 4386-4388; DOI: 10.1128/JB.183.14.4386-4388.2001

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Bacteriology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
New Plasmid System To Select forSaccharomyces cerevisiae Purine-Cytosine Permease Affinity Mutants
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Bacteriology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Bacteriology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
New Plasmid System To Select forSaccharomyces cerevisiae Purine-Cytosine Permease Affinity Mutants
Renaud Wagner, Marie-Laure Straub, Jean-Luc Souciet, Serge Potier, Jacky de Montigny
Journal of Bacteriology Jul 2001, 183 (14) 4386-4388; DOI: 10.1128/JB.183.14.4386-4388.2001
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Carrier Proteins
Membrane Transport Proteins
mutation
plasmids
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JB
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #Jbacteriology

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0021-9193; Online ISSN: 1098-5530