Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Bacteriology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
PHYSIOLOGY AND METABOLISM

Na+/Glutamine (Asparagine) Cotransport by Staphylococcus lugdunensis andCorynebacterium amycolatum

Rafiquel I. Sarker, Peter C. Maloney
Rafiquel I. Sarker
Department of Physiology, Johns Hopkins Medical School, Baltimore, Maryland 21205
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter C. Maloney
Department of Physiology, Johns Hopkins Medical School, Baltimore, Maryland 21205
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JB.183.3.1110-1112.2001
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Staphylococcus lugdunensis and Corynebacterium amycolatum each have a Na+/glutamine cotransporter that displays an ordered reaction sequence at the extracellular surface, with sodium binding (Km of 6.5 mM) before glutamine (Km of 50 μM). Asparagine is low-affinity substrate (Km ≈ 1 mM) for each system.

Staphylococci and corynebacteria are normal residents on human skin (17). In an effort to describe the physiology of bacteria in this ecosystem, we have studied membrane transport by Staphylococcus lugdunensis andCorynebacterium amycolatum. We chose glutamine as the test substrate, both because of its ready availability in human sweat (13) and because as the most abundant amino acid in serum (22), glutamine might serve as a source of carbon and nitrogen during infection (7, 20). Here, we show that kinetically similar Na+/glutamine cotransporters are found in S. lugdunensis and C. amycolatum.

S. lugdunensis (12) and C. amycolatum (9) were grown aerobically at 37°C on Trypticase soy broth with (C. amycolatum) or without (S. lugdunensis) soy lecithin (0.7 g/liter) and Tween 80 (5 g/liter). Cells were harvested, washed, and resuspended in buffer A (50 mM MOPS [morpholinepropanesulfonic acid]-K, 100 mM potassium sulfate [pH 7]) at 3 mg of cell protein/ml. In routine assays, cells (0.3 mg of protein/ml) were suspended at 23°C in buffer A containing 50 mM sodium sulfate and given 50 μM [14C]glutamine (NEN/Life Science, Inc.) or 100 μM [14C]asparagine (NEN/Life Science, Inc.). Samples were filtered through 0.45-μm-pore-diameter Millipore filters and washed twice with cold buffer A.

Starved cells reenergized by glucose or lactate were used to study the effects of metabolic inhibitors. For this purpose, cells were incubated in buffer A with 5 mM 2,4-dinitrophenol, as described previously (3, 15). After removing dinitrophenol, inhibitors were added ( t = −8 min), followed by 10 mM glucose or 20 mM lactate ( t = −3 min) and labeled substrate ( t = 0 min). Starved cells were also used when ion motive gradients were imposed. In this case, cells were suspended in LowNa buffer (buffer A plus 50 mM N-methylglucamine sulfate) or HighNa buffer (buffer A plus 50 mM sodium sulfate). Such cells were starved as described above, along with 10 μM valinomycin to facilitate equilibration of internal and external Na+ and K+ contents. Cells were then washed in the original buffers, resuspended to 1.5 mg of protein/ml, and diluted 100-fold into the following solutions, each containing 50 μM labeled glutamine and 10 μM valinomycin. To generate a sodium chemical gradient (ΔpNa), LowNa cells were diluted into buffer A containing 50 mM sodium sulfate. To generate a sodium electrochemical gradient (ΔpNa plus ΔΨ), LowNa cells were diluted into buffer B (buffer A in with 100 mM MOPS-Tris replacing 100 mM potassium sulfate) plus 50 mM sodium sulfate. To establish a membrane potential (ΔΨ), HighNa cells were diluted into buffer B plus 50 mM sodium sulfate. As a control (no gradient), HighNa cells were diluted 100-fold without changing buffer composition. The imposed ion motive gradients would have had initial values of −120 mV (ΔpNa or ΔΨ) or −240 mV (ΔpNa plus ΔΨ).

Glutamine transport by S. lugdunensis or C. amycolatum was greatly stimulated by sodium (Fig.1A). Preliminary study indicated the two cells had similar kinetic behavior, and detailed analysis of S. lugdunensis showed that the apparent Michaelis constant (Kmapp), but not the maximal velocity (10 to 12 nmol/min/mg of protein), depended on sodium concentration (Fig.1B). This was interpreted as reflecting an ordered bireactant system at the extracellular surface, with Na+ binding before glutamine (23). With this assumption, a replot of such data gave the true Km values for Na+(6.5 mM) and glutamine (47 μM) (Fig. 1C).

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

(A) Glutamine transport was measured for washed cells ofS. lugdunensis in buffer A with (solid symbols) or without (open symbols) 50 mM sodium sulfate. Equivalent findings were made withC. amycolatum (not shown). (B) Initial rates (1 min) of glutamine transport for S. lugdunensis were used to estimate the Kmapp of glutamine for the indicated Na+ concentrations. (C) Data from panel B were used to derive true Km values for sodium and glutamine. (D) Ion motive gradients were imposed as described in the text, with starved cells of S. lugdunensis. Equivalent findings were made with C. amycolatum (not shown).

To determine the specificity of the glutamine transport system, the other 19 amino acids were added in 100-fold molar excess (3 mM versus 30 μM [14C]glutamine) during assays with each cell type; only asparagine gave significant inhibition (≃50%) of glutamine transport. Further tests showed that each cell displayed Na+-dependent asparagine transport (Km ≃ 1 mM; Vmaxof 7 to 10 nmol/min/mg of protein) that was inhibitable (>90%) by a 100-fold excess of glutamine. These data are best explained by the presence of a single Na+-dependent system with a 20-fold higher affinity for glutamine than for asparagine.

To study the energetics of glutamine transport, we first monitored the responses to metabolic inhibitors by starved cells reenergized with glucose or lactate (Table 1). In both instances, a proton conductor (carbonyl cyanidem-chlorophenylhydrazone [CCCP]) gave full inhibition. Iodoacetate was also an effective inhibitor when cells used glucose, but this position was occupied by KCN during lactate oxidation. Moreover, when the proton motive force was increased by blocking the F1-ATPase reentry pathway withN,N′-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCCD) (16), we observed stimulation of glutamine transport, especially for lactate-energized cells. Considered together with the Na+ dependence of glutamine transport, these responses are most easily explained if glutamine transport occurs via an Na+/glutamine cotransporter. This idea was strongly supported by the finding that an inwardly directed sodium motive gradient can drive transport in starved cells in the absence of ongoing metabolism (Fig. 1D). Thus, background levels of transport were found when no ion motive gradients were imposed on starved cells, while increasing levels of glutamine accumulation were elicited by imposition of a membrane potential, a sodium chemical gradient, or both. In the last case, the initial rate of glutamine transport (3 to 4 nmol/min/mg of protein) was comparable to that found for unstarved cells (Fig. 1A).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Effect of metabolic inhibitors on glutamine transport by starved cells of S. lugdunensisa

We conclude that both S. lugdunensis and C. amycolatum possess kinetically similar Na+/glutamine (asparagine) cotransporters whose properties are well adapted to exploit the composition of adult eccrine sweat with respect to Na+ (35 to 60 mM), glutamine (20 μM), and asparagine (160 μM) (13, 14, 22). Because serum has a great excess of glutamine (0.4 mM) (22), we also assume the reaction will operate in situations associated with infection. We note that transport of glutamine is most often attributed to an ATP-dependent system, either as the result of direct experimentation (4-6, 10, 26, 29) or by inference from the genomic sequence (1, 8, 11, 18, 19, 21, 27). Ion-coupled transporters have been less frequently described (2, 24, 25), but of those reported, the account of Siewe et al. (25) is the most relevant. In that instance, study of C. glutamicum revealed a Na+/glutamine cotransporter (reaction order unknown) resembling the systems described here, except for a somewhat higher affinity for Na+ (1.4 mM) than we observed (6.5 mM) (Fig.1C). It is also worth comment that the finding of similar systems inS. lugdunensis and C. amycolatum is unexpected, since among gram-positive bacteria, S. lugdunensis belongs to the group whose DNA has high G+C content, while C. amycolatum is assigned to the low G+C group (28). The presence of similar systems in such divergent cells could be explained by either convergent evolution, driven by the shared ecosystem, or horizontal gene transfer. The availability of genomic sequences should help address this issue.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 15 September 2000.
    • Accepted 13 November 2000.
  • Copyright © 2001 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Andersson S. G. E.,
    2. Zomorodipour A.,
    3. Andersson J. O.,
    4. Sicheritz-Ponten T.,
    5. Alsmark U. C. M.,
    6. et al.
    The genome sequence of Rickettsia prowazekii and the origin of mitochondria.Nature3961998133140
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Beck B. J.,
    2. Russell J. B.
    Electrogenic glutamine uptake by Peptostreptococcus anaerobius and generation of a transmembrane potential.J. Bacteriol.176199413031308
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Berger E. A.
    Different mechanisms of energy coupling for the active transport of proline and glutamine in Escherichia coli.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA70197315141518
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Boos W.,
    2. Lucht J. M.
    Periplasmic binding protein-dependent ABC transporters Escherichia coli and Salmonella: cellular and molecular biology 2nd ed. Neidhardt F. C., Curtiss R. III, Ingraham J. L., Lin E. C. C., Low K. B., Magasanik B., Reznikoff W. S., Riley M., Schaechter M., Umbarger H. E. 1 1996 1175 1209 ASM Press Washington, D.C.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Chapman J. S.,
    2. Meeks J. C.
    Glutamine and glutamate transport by Anabaena variabilis.J. Bacteriol.1561983122129
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Chen G.,
    2. Russell J. B.
    Transport of glutamine by Streptococcus bovis and conversion of glutamine to pyroglutamic acid and ammonia.J. Bacteriol.171198929812985
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Clarridge J. E.,
    2. Spiegel C. A.
    Corynebacterium and miscellaneous gram-positive rods, Erysipelothrix, and Gardnerella Manual of clinical microbiology 6th ed. Murray P. R., Baron E. J., Pfaller M. A., Tenover F. C., Yolken R. H. 1995 357 378 ASM Press Washington, D.C.
  8. 8.↵
    1. Cole S. T.,
    2. Brosch R.,
    3. Parkhill J.,
    4. Garnier G.,
    5. Churcher C.,
    6. et al.
    Deciphering the biology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from the complete genome sequence.Nature3931998537544
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    1. Collins M. D.,
    2. Burton R. A.,
    3. Jones D.
    Corynebacterium amycolatum sp. nov., a new mycolic acid-less Corynebacterium species from human skin.FEMS Microbiol. Lett.491988349352
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. 10.↵
    1. Dashper S. G.,
    2. Riley P. F.,
    3. Reynolds E. C.
    Characterization of glutamine transport in Streptococcus mutans.Oral Microbiol. Immunol.101995183187
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Fleischmann R. D.,
    2. Adams M. D.,
    3. White O.,
    4. Clayton R. A.,
    5. Kirkness E. F.,
    6. et al.
    Whole-genome random sequencing and assembly of Haemophilus influenzae Rd.Science2691995496512
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Freney J.,
    2. Brun Y.,
    3. Bes M.,
    4. Meugnier H.,
    5. Grimont F.,
    6. Grimont P. A. D.,
    7. Nervi C.,
    8. Fleurette J.
    Staphylococcus lugdunensis sp. nov. and Staphylococcus schleiferi sp. nov., two species from human clinical specimens.Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.381988168172
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. 13.↵
    1. Gitlitz P. H.,
    2. Sunderman F. W. Jr.,
    3. Hohnadel D. C.
    Ion-exchange chromatography of amino acids in sweat collected from healthy subjects during sauna bathing.Clin. Chem.20197413051312
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Hadorn B.,
    2. Hanimann F.,
    3. Anders P.,
    4. Curtius H. C.,
    5. Halverson R.
    Free amino-acids in human sweat from different parts of the body.Nature2151967416417
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Hama H.,
    2. Shimamoto T.,
    3. Tsuda M.,
    4. Tsuchiya T.
    Properties of a Na+-coupled serine-threonine transport system in Escherichia coli.Biochim. Biophys. Acta9051987231239
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Harold F. M.,
    2. Maloney P. C.
    Energy transduction by ion currents Escherichia coli and Salmonella: cellular and molecular biology. 2nd ed. Neidhardt F. C., Curtiss R. III, Ingraham J. L., Lin E. C. C., Low K. B., Magasanik B., Reznikoff W. S., Riley M., Schaechter M., Umbarger H. E. 1 1996 283 306 ASM Press Washington, D.C.
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.↵
    1. Isenberg H. D.,
    2. D'Amato R. F.
    Indigenous and pathogenic microorganisms of humans Manual of clinical microbiology 6th ed. Murray P. R., Baron E. J., Pfaller M. A., Tenover F. C., Yolken R. H. 1995 5 18 ASM Press Washington, D.C.
  18. 18.↵
    1. Kaneko T.,
    2. Sato S.,
    3. Kotani H.,
    4. Tanaka A.,
    5. Asamizu E.,
    6. et al.
    Sequence analysis of the genome of the unicellular cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. strain PCC6803. II. Sequence determination of the entire genome and assignment of potential protein-coding regions.DNA Res.301996109136
    OpenUrl
  19. 19.↵
    1. Klenk H.-P.,
    2. Clayton R. A.,
    3. Tomb J.-F.,
    4. White O.,
    5. Nelson D. E.,
    6. et al.
    The complete genome sequence of the hyperthermophilic, sulphate-reducing archaeon Archaeoglobus fulgidus.Nature3901997364370
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    1. Kloos W. E.,
    2. Bannerman T. L.
    Staphylococcus and Micrococcus Manual of clinical microbiology 6th ed. Murray P. R., Baron E. J., Pfaller M. A., Tenover F. C., Yolken R. H. 1995 282 298 ASM Press Washington, D.C.
  21. 21.↵
    1. Kunst F.,
    2. Ogasawara N.,
    3. Moszer I.,
    4. Albertini A. M.,
    5. Alloni G.,
    6. et al.
    The complete genome sequence of the gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis.Nature3901997249256
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    1. Lentner C.
    Geigy scientific tables 8th ed. 1 1981 Medical Education Division, Ciba-Geigy Corp. West Caldwell, N.J
  23. 23.↵
    1. Segel I. H.
    Enzyme kinetics. 1993 Wiley-Interscience New York, N.Y
  24. 24.↵
    1. Short S. A.,
    2. White D. C.,
    3. Kaback H. R.
    Mechanism of active transport in isolated bacterial membrane vesicles. IX. The kinetics and specificity of amino acid transport in Staphylococcus aureus membrane vesicles.J. Biol. Chem.247197274527458
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Siewe R. M.,
    2. Weil B.,
    3. Kramer R.
    Glutamine uptake by a sodium-dependent secondary transport system in Corynebacterium glutamicum.Arch. Microbiol.16419959981003
    OpenUrl
  26. 26.↵
    1. Strobel H. J.,
    2. Russell J. B.,
    3. Driessen A. J. M.,
    4. Konings W. N.
    Transport of amino acids in Lactobacillus casei by proton-motive-force-dependent and non-proton-motive-force-dependent mechanisms.J. Bacteriol.1711989280284
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Tomb J.-F.,
    2. White O.,
    3. Kerlavage A. R.,
    4. Clayton R. A.,
    5. Sutton G. G.,
    6. et al.
    The complete genome sequence of the gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori.Nature3881997539547
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    1. Woese C. R.
    Bacterial evolution.Microbiol. Rev.511987221271
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Zheng S.,
    2. Haselkorn R.
    A glutamate/glutamine/aspartate/asparagine transport operon in Rhodobacter capsulatus.Mol. Microbiol.20199610011011
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Na+/Glutamine (Asparagine) Cotransport by Staphylococcus lugdunensis andCorynebacterium amycolatum
Rafiquel I. Sarker, Peter C. Maloney
Journal of Bacteriology Feb 2001, 183 (3) 1110-1112; DOI: 10.1128/JB.183.3.1110-1112.2001

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Bacteriology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Na+/Glutamine (Asparagine) Cotransport by Staphylococcus lugdunensis andCorynebacterium amycolatum
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Bacteriology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Bacteriology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Na+/Glutamine (Asparagine) Cotransport by Staphylococcus lugdunensis andCorynebacterium amycolatum
Rafiquel I. Sarker, Peter C. Maloney
Journal of Bacteriology Feb 2001, 183 (3) 1110-1112; DOI: 10.1128/JB.183.3.1110-1112.2001
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Amino Acid Transport System X-AG
Carrier Proteins
Corynebacterium
Glutamates
Sodium
Staphylococcus
Symporters

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JB
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #Jbacteriology

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0021-9193; Online ISSN: 1098-5530