Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Bacteriology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
GENETICS AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY

Identification and Characterization ofgsp65, an Organic Hydroperoxide Resistance (ohr) Gene Encoding a General Stress Protein in Enterococcus faecalis

Alain Rincé, Jean-Christophe Giard, Vianney Pichereau, Sigrid Flahaut, Yanick Auffray
Alain Rincé
Laboratoire de Microbiologie de l'Environnement, IRBA, Université de Caen, 14032 Caen Cedex, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean-Christophe Giard
Laboratoire de Microbiologie de l'Environnement, IRBA, Université de Caen, 14032 Caen Cedex, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vianney Pichereau
Laboratoire de Microbiologie de l'Environnement, IRBA, Université de Caen, 14032 Caen Cedex, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sigrid Flahaut
Laboratoire de Microbiologie de l'Environnement, IRBA, Université de Caen, 14032 Caen Cedex, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yanick Auffray
Laboratoire de Microbiologie de l'Environnement, IRBA, Université de Caen, 14032 Caen Cedex, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JB.183.4.1482-1488.2001
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The Enterococcus faecalis general stress protein Gsp65 has been purified from two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Determination of its N-terminal sequence and characterization of the corresponding gene revealed that the gsp65 product is a 133-amino-acid protein sharing homologies with organic hydroperoxide resistance (Ohr) proteins. Transcriptional analysis ofgsp65 gave evidence for a monocistronic mRNA initiated 52 nucleotides upstream of the ATG start codon and for an induction in response to hydrogen peroxide, heat shock, acid pH, detergents, ethanol, sodium chloride, and tert-butylhydroperoxide (tBOOH). A gsp65 mutant showed increased sensitivity to the organic hydroperoxide tBOOH and to ethanol.

The gram-positive bacteriumEnterococcus faecalis is a natural member of the human and animal flora. This ubiquitous microorganism, which may be responsible for serious diseases (i.e., endocarditis, meningitis, intra-abdominal and urinary tract wounds, and other infections [23, 27]), is able to grow in hostile conditions that are usually detrimental to the development of most mesophilic microorganisms, and it can survive in many harsh environments (i.e., extreme temperatures, pHs, and salt concentrations). The ability of E. faecalis to resist many kinds of stresses is of particular importance (i) for its selective isolation and characterization (selective media with 6.5% NaCl, 40% bile salts, 0.1% methylene blue milk, or pH 9.6 are commonly used [22, 28]), (ii) for the detection of fecal contamination (E. faecalis is considered a good indicator of fecal contamination in water and foods, and its detection can be used to indicate the presence of pathogenic bacteria [3, 24]), and (iii) because it copes with stresses frequently used to prevent the proliferation of foodborne pathogens in food processes (4, 9). Numerous reports reflect the ability of exponentially growing E. faecalis cells to resist stresses such as heating, high osmolarity, and the presence of ethanol, detergents, hydrogen peroxide, sodium hypochlorite, and heavy metals (2, 4-7, 10, 18, 25). Moreover, starvation promoted by exhaustion of the carbon and energy source glucose, and after incubation in an oligotrophic microcosm, strongly enhances the resistance of E. faecalis to environmental stresses and can be correlated with an increased synthesis of many proteins (11, 12, 15). The adaptation phenomenon has also been observed when exponentially growing cultures of E. faecalis are subjected to sublethal conditions, e.g., 30 min at 50 or 37°C in the presence of hydrogen peroxide (2.4 mM), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) (0.01%), bile salts (0.08%), cadmium chloride (50 μg/ml), or pH 4.8 or 10.5 (2, 4-10, 17). Under these conditions, E. faecalis developed phenotypic resistances towards usually lethal stresses (heating at 62°C, pH 3.2 or 11.9, 45 mM H2O2, CdCl2 [50 mg/ml], SDS [0.017%], or bile salts [0.3%]). Analysis of protein synthesis during preincubation of exponentially growing cells of E. faecalis with sublethal stresses led to the detection of overexpression of 167 stress proteins. While most of these stress proteins were shown to be specifically induced by one or two treatments, six proteins, called general stress proteins (Gsp62 to Gsp67), were induced by at least six stress conditions (26). A previous study carried out by Western blot analysis allowed the identification of Gsp66 and Gsp67 as being DnaK and GroEL chaperonins, respectively (8). A recent study revealed that the E. faecalis glucose starvation protein Gls24 was not induced exclusively during carbohydrate and complete starvation but also after exposure to several stresses and consequently could also be qualified as a general stress protein (13).

In order to identify the general stress protein Gsp65, we purified this protein from two-dimensional (2-D) electrophoresis, and after sequencing of its N-terminal extremity, we identified the corresponding gene. Sequence analysis and mutation experiments revealed that this gene encodes a protein involved in organic hydroperoxide resistance.

Identification of gsp65.Among the different stress proteins identified on 2-D electropherograms (26) of proteins extracted from E. faecalis ATCC 19433 (16), Gsp65 was purified after electroblotting from a 2-D electrophoresis of proteins extracted after a 30-min sublethal treatment at 50°C onto a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane as described by Giard et al. (12). The purified protein was then subjected to N-terminal sequencing. This allowed the identification of the N-terminal 39-amino-acid sequence MKKIYETTIINTGGRAGEVHSPDKSFXYAVASPGVKKEN. Homology searches carried out with the BLAST program (1) gave no significant homologies with sequences from databases. The corresponding open reading frame (ORF) was obtained within the genomic sequence of E. faecalis (V583) available at http://www.tigr.org . The analysis of the deduced N-terminal amino acid sequence revealed that the unidentified amino acid (X) in position 27 of our sequence was a serine. Observation of the nucleotide sequence immediately upstream of this ORF gave evidence for the presence of a ribosome binding site sequence (RBS) (AGAGGA) located 7 bp upstream of the initiation codon (ATG). Translation of the entire ORF revealed that it encodes a 133-amino-acid protein with a calculated molecular mass of 14.4 kDa, in concordance with the location of the protein on 2-D electropherograms.

From this entire deduced amino acid sequence, homologies were found with organic hydroperoxide resistance (Ohr) proteins which are similar to the Escherichia coli OsmC protein. The higher homology scores were observed with proteins encoded by the organic hydroperoxide resistance gene (ohr) of Xanthomonas campestris(44% homology and 64% similarity) (21) and by hypothetical ohr genes of Bacillus subtilis(YklA, 51% homology and 66% similarity; YkzA, 48% homology and 62% similarity) (30) and Deinococcus radiodurans(46% homology and 61% similarity) (31). Alignments with these proteins and with the OsmC protein from E. coli (Fig.1) showed that the sequence corresponding to the first 40 amino acids is less conserved than the other parts of the proteins and that the central domain harbors a 15-amino-acid segment that is highly conserved within all sequences. The hydrophobicity profiles of Gsp65 and of proteins belonging to the OsmC family are well conserved and showed that the 15-amino-acid conserved region is part of a hydrophobic domain located between positions 43 and 63 (data not shown). From a previous alignment of Ohr sequences with OsmC proteins of E. coli and Mycoplasma genitalium, Mongkolsuk et al. (21) suggested that two highly conserved redox-sensitive cysteine residues could be important in the structure and function of Ohr. These two cysteines are also present in Gsp65 (amino acids at positions 62 and 129 in Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Amino acid sequence comparison of Gsp65 with Ohr proteins from B. subtilis (YkzA Bs and YklABs) (accession numbers F69870 and D69857 ) (30),X. campestris (Ohr Xc) (accession numberAF036166 ) (21), D. radiodurans (OhrDr) (accession number AE002025 .1) (31), andE. coli OsmC (OsmC Ec) (accession number P23929 ) (14). Complete amino acid sequence identity in three out of the six proteins is indicated in boldface. Asterisks and dots indicate positions where, respectively, identical and functionally related (H, K, and R; F, Y, and W; L, I, M, and V; G and A; S and T; D and E; N and Q; C and P) amino acid are found in the six proteins. The consensus sequence is given with lowercase and capital letters, which represent identity in all and in five out of the six proteins, respectively.

Genetic organization of gsp65.Analysis of the genomic sequence of B. subtilis revealed two ohrgenes (yklA and ykzA), while Mongkolsuk et al. (21) gave evidence for a single ohr gene inX. campestris. In order to search for the presence of another gene in E. faecalis, a Southern blot analysis was carried out with E. faecalis JH2-2 (32) chromosomal DNA digested by ClaI or EcoRV and hybridized with a 32P-labeled PCR DNA fragment obtained with primers P4 and P5 (Fig. 2). A unique band was observed with each digest (data not shown), suggesting a unique ohr gene in E. faecalis. Moreover, searches for homology between the almost-complete genomic sequence ofE. faecalis V583 (http://www.tigr.org ) and the entire amino acid sequence of Gsp65 or the 15-amino-acid domain that is highly conserved within Ohr proteins suggested that there is no paralog in theE. faecalis chromosome. Analysis of the nucleotide sequence indicated that gsp65 is surrounded by two ORFs located on the other strand of the DNA (Fig. 2A). The amino acid sequences of these ORFs (named orfA and orfB) corresponded to proteins of 57.4 and 28.0 kDa with pIs of 4.81 and 9.22, respectively, which did not share significant homology with known proteins. An inverted repeat (Δ G = −22.4 kcal/mol) (Fig. 2A) which could act as a Rho-independent terminator was observed 2 nucleotides (nt) downstream from the gsp65 termination codon TAA.

Fig. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

(A) Schematic representation of the genetic organization of the gsp65 chromosomal region. Large arrows represent the ORFs, and their orientation shows the transcriptional direction. The nucleotide sequences of the gsp65 promoter region (Pr) and of a putative Rho-independent terminator (T1) located 2 nt downstream of the gsp65 stop codon are shown. The transcriptional initiation nucleotide (+1) and the putative −35 and −10 motifs are boxed. Primer positions are indicated by small arrows. (B) Primer extension experiment. Lane 1, primer extension signal obtained with the primer Pext and RNA extracted from E. faecalis JH2-2 cells incubated for 10 min with 0.08% bile salts. Lanes C, A, T, and G, products of the sequencing reactions performed with the transcribed DNA strand used for standardization. The arrowhead indicates the primer extension signal which corresponds to the transcriptional start site. (C) Electropherogram obtained from 5′ RACE PCR experiment. The sequence in the electropherogram was obtained using the primer Pext and cDNA from 5′ A-tailed RNA, using the 3′/5′ RACE kit (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). The last base (C) upstream from the 16-n A tail corresponded to the first nucleotide transcribed. The corresponding G on the reverse complement strand is indicated (+1).

Transcriptional analysis of gsp65.A Northern blot of 10 μg of RNA extracted with the Rneasy Midi Kit (Qiagen, Santa Clara, Calif.) from an exponentially growing culture of E. faecalis JH2-2 or from cells subjected to a sublethal treatment with 0.08% bile salts was carried out as described by Giard et al. (13). The RNA was then hybridized with a gsp65single-stranded probe synthesized by elongation of the oligonucleotide P4 using Taq DNA polymerase, deoxynucleoside triphosphates (including 2 μCi of [α-32P]dATP), and 10 ng of template DNA corresponding to an amplimer previously obtained from a PCR with primers P4 and P5 (Fig. 2A; Table1). The results confirmed the presence of a monocistronic mRNA of 560 bp. The transcription of gsp65was obviously induced in the presence of bile salts, and the maximum expression was observed after 10 min of stress exposure (Fig.3A). A dot blot obtained with 1 μg of total RNA extracted from E. faecalis JH2-2 cells growing in M17 medium containing 0.5% glucose (29) or from cells pretreated for 10 min with sublethal doses of several agents was hybridized with the same probe. It revealed that the transcription of the gsp65 gene is also induced after incubation at 50°C, at acid pH (pH 4.8), or in the presence of 0.01% SDS, 4% ethanol, 2 mM tert-butylhydroperoxide (tBOOH), or, at a lower level, H2O2 (Fig. 3B). The major induction observed with the dot blot experiments was obtained with tBOOH. Whilegsp65 is homologous to osmotically induced genes of theosmC family, only a weak induction was observed when cells were exposed for 10 min to 6% (1.02 M) sodium chloride. Northern blot experiments were then carried out with RNA extracted from cells treated for 10 min with 0.3, 0.6, 0.9, and 1.2 M NaCl (Fig. 3C). The results clearly demonstrated that gsp65 is induced by salt, with a maximum induction of transcription at a concentration of 0.3 M NaCl. These transcriptional analyses lead to an unambiguous demonstration that Gsp65 belongs to the group of general stress proteins. However, it has to be noted that the amount of stress used for the dot blot analysis corresponded to that allowing the maximum tolerance of cells towards a lethal treatment, and this does not necessarily correlate with the optimum concentration allowing the maximum induction ofgsp65 transcription. Such an absence of a correlation been demonstrated at least for the NaCl concentration: 1.02 M allowed the maximum tolerance, while the concentration allowing the maximum induction of transcription was 0.3 M.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Primers used for PCR, mutagenesis, sequencing, primer extension, and 5′ RACE PCR experiments

Fig. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

(A) Northern blot hybridization of E. faecalis JH2-2 RNA extracted from exponentially growing cells (lane 1) and from cells incubated for 10, 20, and 30 min (lanes 2 to 4, respectively) with 0.08% bile salts. Hybridization was performed with a single-stranded DNA probe corresponding to the DNA region located between primers P4 and P5. The size of the transcript determined with RNA molecular size markers (Amersham) is indicated on the right. (B) Dot blot hybridization of total RNA (1 μg) from E. faecalis JH2-2 cells harvested in exponential growth phase (control) and from exponentially growing cells incubated for 10 min under the indicated conditions with the single-stranded DNA probe corresponding to the DNA region located between primers P4 and P5. (C) Northern blot hybridization of E. faecalis JH2-2 RNA extracted from exponentially growing cells (lane 1) and from cells incubated for 10 min with 0.3, 0.6, 0.9, and 1.2 M NaCl (lanes 2 to 5, respectively) with the single-stranded DNA probe corresponding to the DNA region located between primers P4 and P5. The size of the transcript determined with RNA molecular size markers (0.56- to 0.94-kb RNA ladder; Amersham) is indicated on the right.

Mapping of the transcriptional start site ofgsp65.In order to locate the region involved in the initiation of the transcription of gsp65, primer extension and 5′ rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) PCR experiments were carried out with RNA extracted from E. faecalis JH2-2 cells treated for 10 min with 2 mM tBOOH. Primer extension performed as described by Giard et al. (13) with the primer Pext (Table1) revealed a unique band corresponding to a cDNA whose size positioned the gsp65 mRNA 5′ end 40 nt upstream of the RBS (Fig. 2B). Electrophoresis on a 6% acrylamide gel of the 5′ RACE PCR product obtained with the 3′/5′ RACE kit (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) using primer P6 for the reverse transcriptase reaction and primer Ppe for poly(A) tailing and PCR amplification revealed a unique 250-bp fragment (data not shown). The nucleotide sequence of this 5′ RACE PCR product was determined after purification with the QIAquick kit (Qiagen) by the dideoxy chain termination method with the ABI prism sequencing system (PE Biosystems) and Pext primer. It confirmed the sole transcriptional start on the G located 40 nt upstream of the gsp65 RBS (Fig.2C). At 6 bp upstream of this transcriptional start site can be found a putative −10 sequence (TACAAT) separated by 17 bp from a putative −35 sequence (TTGCTG), each of which partially resembled the −10 and −35 consensus sequences (TATAAT and TTGACA, respectively). Upstream of this gsp65promoter, two direct repeats, DR1 (TGTACAANTGTACAA) and DR2 [ACAACGT(N)27ACAACGTT] and an inverted repeat (AAAAATAcAACgTTcAAtGTTATTTTT) can be identified. Because our results demonstrate that the gsp65promoter is stress inducible, such a structure may have an important role in the initiation of transcription.

Construction of a gsp65 mutant by double crossing over.A gsp65 mutant was constructed by introducing two translational stop codons within the gsp65 gene via a double-crossover event using a method based on the conditional replication pORI19/ pG+host3 system first described for the single-crossover interruption of chromosomal genes in Lactococcus lactis by Law et al. (19). First, a 705-bp DNA fragment was amplified by PCR using chromosomal DNA of E. faecalis JH2-2 and oligonucleotides P1 and P4 (Fig. 2A; Table 1). This PCR fragment was then cloned into the SmaI site of the vector pORI19-1 using E. coli Ec101 (19). The resulting plasmid (p65) was used as a DNA template to perform a second PCR using oligonucleotides Pdc1 and Pdc2 (Fig. 2A; Table 1). The 2.9-kb PCR product obtained was digested by SmaI, purified, and ligated to obtain a circular plasmid (p65m) which was then used to transform E. coli Ec101. The insert of plasmid p65m isolated from transformant clones and containing a SmaI site was sequenced to confirm the mutation in the gsp65 ORF by insertion of two translational stop codons. This plasmid was then used to transform E. faecalis JH2-2 in which plasmid pG+host3 (pVE6007) (20), encoding a thermosensitive RepA protein, had previously been introduced. After electroporation, cells were plated on GM17 agar medium containing erythromycin and chloramphenicol and incubated at 30°C. Clones resistant to both antibiotics were shown to harbor the two plasmids pG+host3 and p65m. One of these clones was then grown for 1 h at 30°C in GM17 broth without antibiotics and transferred for 3 h at 42°C before being plated on GM17 agar medium containing erythromycin. After a 48-h incubation at 42°C, clones resistant to erythromycin were analyzed by PCR and were shown to be integrants containing both the wild-type and the mutated alleles of thegsp65 gene. Southern blot experiments confirmed that the p65m integration event occurred within the gsp65 gene (data not shown). To obtain the second crossing over, integrant cells were transformed with plasmid pG+host3. After electroporation, transformants were selected at a permissive temperature (30°C) on GM17 plates with chloramphenicol. They were grown for 100 generations at 30°C on GM17 broth containing chloramphenicol and then grown for 1 h at 30°C on GM17 without antibiotics and transferred at 42°C for 3 h before being plated in the same medium and incubated at 42°C. Twelve erythromycin-sensitive clones were isolated out of 600 clones analyzed. Total DNA was extracted from these erythromycin-sensitive clones, digested by ClaI, and hybridized with a gsp65 probe. This revealed that all 12 clones were generated by a second crossing over which resulted in the excision of the pORI19-1 vector plus one copy of gsp65. Results of a SmaI digest of PCR fragments amplified with primers P1 and P4 showed that half of the clones kept the wild-type copy of gsp65 while the six others harbored aSmaI site within the gsp65 gene and were considered mutants. The genotype of one of these mutant (called thegsp65 mutant) was confirmed by nucleotide sequencing and by the disappearance of Gsp65 on 2-D gel electrophoresis. To our knowledge, this is the first report on chromosomal inactivation inE. faecalis via double crossing over. This mutagenesis system, which limits the polar effect of mutation on transcription of downstream genes, was successfully used in our laboratory for the inactivation of other stress genes and should probably be usable with a large number of bacterial species, as it derives from the large-host-range pWV01 replicon.

Characterization of the gsp65 mutant.Growth studies of the gsp65 mutant strain did not reveal any significant difference compared to the wild-type JH2-2 strain when cultured at 37°C in brain heart infusion (BHI) broth, indicating thatgsp65 is dispensable for optimal growth. The generation time for these two strains was 37.5 min (data not shown). To determine the potential role of the general stress protein Gsp65 in the resistance ofE. faecalis to environmental stresses, sensitivity to sublethal stress conditions and survival with different individual challenges were tested. To analyze the sensitivity of thegsp65 mutant, cells were taken at the begining of exponential growth (optical density [OD] of 0.2), harvested, and resuspended in BHI medium containing 5% ethanol, 0.002% SDS, 0.06% bile salts, 5.5% NaCl, 2 mM H2O2, or 0.15 mM tBOOH; resuspend in BHi medium adjusted to pH 9.8 or pH 5.8; or incubated at 48°C. Each of these stresses did reduce the growth rates of both the mutant and wild-type strains without inducing a complete arrest of cell proliferation. A significant difference in sensitivity between the two strains was observed only with the tBOOH treatment (Fig. 4A). Indeed, the gsp65culture reached an OD of 1 with a 70.8-min delay compared to the JH2-2 strain.

Fig. 4.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

(A) Effect of tBOOH on wild-type E. faecalisJH2-2 and gsp65 mutant growth. Cultures grown in BHI medium to an OD at 600 nm of 0.2 were divided and either treated with 0.15 mM tBOOH or not. Squares, JH2-2; circles, gsp65 mutant; closed symbols, treated; open symbol; untreated. The values are the averages of results obtained in three independent experiments. (B and C) Effect of tBOOH (B) and ethanol (C) on wild-type E. faecalis JH2-2 and gsp65 mutant survival. Bacteria grown in BHI medium to an OD at 600 nm of 0.5 were harvested and resuspended in BHI medium (control) or BHI medium containing 20 mM tBOOH or 22% ethanol (challenges). The percent viability represents the ratio between the number of cells surviving after 30 min of challenge and the number surviving prior challenge.

The survival of wild-type strain JH2-2 and the gsp65 mutant after different individual lethal treatments was analyzed as follows. Bacteria from the mid-exponential growth phase were harvested, resuspended in 10 ml of fresh BHI medium, and incubated at 37°C (control), at 62°C (thermal challenge), or at 37°C in medium supplied with (i) 22% ethanol, (ii) 0.3% bile salts, (iii) 0.017% SDS, (iv) 28.5% NaCl, (v) 45 mM H2O2, (vi) lactic acid to adjust the pH to 3.2, (vii) NaOH to adjust the pH to 11.9, or (viii) 20 mM tBOOH. Challenges were performed for 30 min except for the detergents bile salts and SDS (30 s). Samples (0.5 ml) were removed, diluted in 0.9% NaCl, and poured in GM17 agar for determination of CFU. Plates were incubated at 37°C for 48 h. These individual lethal treatments induced no significant reduction of the percent survival when heat shock, NaCl, pH, detergent, and H2O2 challenges were applied. However, thegsp65 mutant was shown to be less resistant to the oxidative stress generated by 20 mM tBOOH and to the 22% ethanol challenge; 35- and 30-fold reductions of the percent survival were observed when cells were incubated for 30 min with tBOOH and ethanol, respectively (Fig. 4B and C). When cells were preincubated for 30 minutes with 2 mM tBOOH or 4% ethanol before the homologous challenge, the gsp65mutant was partially adapted, and, in comparison with the wild-type strain, 10- and 6-fold reductions of the percent survival were observed with 20 mM tBOOH and 22% ethanol, respectively. Sublethal heterologous pretreatments with stresses inducing gsp65 were also applied prior the tBOOH challenge in order to search for treatments which can increase resistance against tBOOH. When a sublethal treatment with heat, bile salts, NaCl, or acid pH was applied as described by Flahaut et al. (10) prior to the tBOOH challenge, partial adaptations were observed for both the wild-type and mutant strains (data not shown). However, this led to a reduction of the survival difference between the strains, indicating that these heterologous tolerances are the result of other inducible stress resistance mechanisms. A 30-min pretreatment with 0.01% SDS, which was previously shown to induce tolerance towards SDS and bile salts challenges (5), did not induce tolerance against tBOOH.

A 2-D protein gel electrophoresis approach was used for the identification of modifications in the protein pattern due to thegsp65 mutation. 2-D polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) of proteins extracted as previously described by Giard et al. (12) from exponentially growing JH2-2 cells exposed or not to 2 mM tBOOH for 30 min revealed the induction of numerous proteins by the tBOOH treatment. Gsp65 belongs to these overexpressed proteins, with an induction factor of 9 (data not shown). 2-D PAGE revealed no significant difference between the gsp65 and wild-type strains, except for the expected absence of Gsp65 in the mutant pattern (Fig. 5). The fact that 2D-PAGE of the mutant did not revealed a pleiotropic effect of the mutation on the synthesis of other proteins, while the gsp65strain was shown to be sensitive to the organic hydroperoxide tBOOH, argues for a direct role of Gsp65 in tBOOH resistance. Such a phenotype was also obtained with an ohr mutant of X. campestris by Mongkolsuk et al. (21), who suggested that Ohr might function directly in detoxification of organic hydroperoxide. However, those authors did not exclude the possibility that Ohr might be involved in the transport of organic molecules. The latter hypothesis can be argued by the fact that the most conserved region within Ohr proteins corresponded to unique hydrophobic segment of Ohr that probably crosses the membrane. Interestingly, thegsp65 mutant was also shown to be more sensitive to ethanol challenge. To our knowledge, this is the first report of anohr mutant phenotype towards a stress different from oxidative stress.

Fig. 5.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

Autoradiogram of 2-D-labeled protein gels of E. faecalis JH2-2 (A) and the gsp65 mutant (B). The pictures represent parts of the autoradiograms obtained after electrophoresis of labeled proteins during the 30-min treatment with 2 mM tBOOH. The arrow shows the position of the spot corresponding to Gsp65.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful to C. J. Leenhouts (Department of Genetics, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands) and E. Maguin (INRA, Jouy-en-Josas, France) for providing us with plasmid pORI19-1 and the E. coli Ec101 strain and pG+host3 plasmid, respectively. The expert technical assistance of Annick Blandin and Béatrice Gillot was greatly appreciated.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 28 August 2000.
    • Accepted 1 November 2000.
  • Copyright © 2001 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Altschul S. F.,
    2. Gish W.,
    3. Miller W.,
    4. Myers E. W.,
    5. Lipman D. J.
    Basic local alignment search tool.J. Mol. Biol.2151990403410
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Boutibonnes P.,
    2. Giard J. C.,
    3. Hartke A.,
    4. Thammavongs B.,
    5. Auffray Y.
    Characterization of the heat shock response in Enterococcus faecalis.Antonie Leeuwenhoek6419934755
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Burton M. C.
    Comparison of coliform and Enterococcus organisms as indices of pollution in frozen foods.Food Res.141949434448
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Flahaut S.,
    2. Hartke A.,
    3. Giard J. C.,
    4. Benachour A.,
    5. Boutibonnes P.,
    6. Auffray Y.
    Relationship between stress response toward bile salts, acid and heat treatment in Enterococcus faecalis.FEMS Microbiol. Lett.13819964954
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Flahaut S.,
    2. Frere J.,
    3. Boutibonnes P.,
    4. Auffray Y.
    Comparison of the bile salts and sodium dodecyl sulfate stress responses in Enterococcus faecalis.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.62199624162420
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Flahaut S.,
    2. Benachour A.,
    3. Giard J. C.,
    4. Boutibonnes P.,
    5. Auffray Y.
    Defense against lethal treatments and de novo protein synthesis induced by NaCl in Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 19433.Arch. Microbiol.1651996317324
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Flahaut S.,
    2. Hartke A.,
    3. Giard J. C.,
    4. Auffray Y.
    Alkaline stress response in Enterococcus faecalis: adaptation, cross-protection, and changes in protein synthesis.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.631997812814
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Flahaut S.,
    2. Frere J.,
    3. Boutibonnes P.,
    4. Auffray Y.
    Relationship between the thermotolerance and the increase of DnaK and GroEL synthesis in Enterococcus faecalis ATCC19433.J. Basic Microbiol.371997251258
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Flahaut S.,
    2. Boutibonnes P.,
    3. Auffray Y.
    Les Enterocoques dans l'environnement proche de l'homme.Can. J. Microbiol.431997699708
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Flahaut S.,
    2. Laplace J. M.,
    3. Frere J.,
    4. Auffray Y.
    The oxidative stress response in Enterococcus faecalis: relationship between H2O2 tolerance and H2O2 stress proteins.Lett. Appl. Microbiol.261998259264
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Giard J. C.,
    2. Hartke A.,
    3. Flahaut S.,
    4. Benachour A.,
    5. Boutibonnes P.,
    6. Auffray Y.
    Starvation-induced multiresistance in Enterococcus faecalis JH2–2.Curr. Microbiol.321996264271
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Giard J. C.,
    2. Hartke A.,
    3. Flahaut S.,
    4. Benachour A.,
    5. Boutibonnes P.,
    6. Auffray Y.
    Glucose starvation response in Enterococcus faecalis JH2–2: survival and proteins analysis.Res. Microbiol.14819972735
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    1. Giard J. C.,
    2. Rincé A.,
    3. Capiaux H.,
    4. Auffray Y.,
    5. Hartke A.
    Inactivation of the stress- and starvation-inducible gls24 operon has a pleiotropic effect on cell morphology, stress sensitivity and gene expression in Enterococcus faecalis.J. Bacteriol.182200045124520
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Gutierrez C.,
    2. Devedjian J. C.
    Osmotic induction of gene osmC expression in Escherichia coli K12.J. Mol. Biol.2201991959973
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    1. Hartke A.,
    2. Giard J. C.,
    3. Laplace J. M.,
    4. Auffray Y.
    Survival of Enterococcus faecalis in an oligotrophic microcosm: changes in morphology, development of general stress resistance, and analysis of protein synthesis.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.64199842384245
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Jones D.,
    2. Shattock P. M.
    The location of the group antigen of group D Streptococcus.J. Gen. Microbiol.231960335343
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Laplace J. M.,
    2. Boutibonnes P.,
    3. Auffray Y.
    Unusual resistance and acquired tolerance to cadmium chloride in Enterococcus faecalis.J. Basic Microbiol.361996311317
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Laplace J. M.,
    2. Thuault M.,
    3. Hartke A.,
    4. Boutibonnes P.,
    5. Auffray Y.
    Sodium hypochlorite stress in Enterococcus faecalis: influence of antecedent growth conditions and induced proteins.Curr. Microbiol.341997284289
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Law J.,
    2. Buist G.,
    3. Haandrikman A.,
    4. Kok J.,
    5. Venema G.,
    6. Leenhouts K.
    A system to generate chromosomal mutations in Lactococcus lactis which allows fast analysis of targeted genes.J. Bacteriol.177199570117018
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Maguin E.,
    2. Duwat T.,
    3. Hege T.,
    4. Ehrlich D.,
    5. Gruss A.
    New thermosensitive plasmid for gram-positive bacteria.J. Bacteriol.174199256335638
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Mongkolsuk S.,
    2. Praituan W.,
    3. Loprasert S.,
    4. Fuangthong M.,
    5. Chamnongpol S.
    Identification and characterization of a new organic hydroperoxide resistance (ohr) gene with a novel pattern of oxidative stress regulation from Xanthomonas campestris pv. phaseoli.J. Bacteriol.180199826362643
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Mundt J. O.
    Enterococci Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology Sneath P. H. A., Mair N. S., Sharpe M. E., Holt J. G. 2 1986 1063 1065 Williams & Wilkins Baltimore, Md
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.↵
    1. Nosking G. A.,
    2. Patterson T. M.,
    3. Clarke J. Y.,
    4. Warren J. R.
    High-level gentamicin resistance in Enterococcus faecalis bacteremia.J. Infect. Dis.164199112121215
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    1. Ostrolenk M.,
    2. Kramer N.,
    3. Clerverdon R. C.
    Comparative studies of enterococci and Escherichia coli as indices of pollution.J. Bacteriol.531947197203
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Pichereau V.,
    2. Bourot S.,
    3. Flahaut S.,
    4. Blanco C.,
    5. Auffray Y.,
    6. Bernard T.
    The osmoprotectant glycine betaine inhibits salt-induced cross-tolerance towards lethal treatment in Enterococcus faecalis.Microbiology1451999427435
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.↵
    1. Rincé A.,
    2. Flahaut S.,
    3. Auffray Y.
    Identification of general stress genes in Enterococcus faecalis.Int. J. Food Microbiol.5520008791
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    1. Schaberg D. R.,
    2. Culver D. H.,
    3. Gaynes R. P.
    Major trends in microbial etiology of nosocomial infection.Am. J. Med. Suppl.3B1991725758
    OpenUrl
  28. 28.↵
    1. Sherman J. M.
    The streptococci.Bacteriol. Rev.11937397
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Terzaghi B. E.,
    2. Sandine W. E.
    Improved medium for lactic streptococci and their bacteriophages.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.291975807813
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Volker U.,
    2. Andersen K. K.,
    3. Antelmann H.,
    4. Devine K. M.,
    5. Hecker M.
    One of two osmC homologs in Bacillus subtilis is part of the sigmaB-dependent general stress regulon.J. Bacteriol.180199842124218
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. White O.,
    2. Eisen J. A.,
    3. Heidelberg J. F.,
    4. Hickey E. K.,
    5. Peterson J. D.,
    6. Dodson R. J.,
    7. Haft D. H.,
    8. Gwinn M. L.,
    9. Nelson W. C.,
    10. Richardson D. L.,
    11. Moffat K. S.,
    12. et al.
    Genome sequence of the radioresistant bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans R1.Science286199915711577
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    1. Yagi Y.,
    2. Clewell D. B.
    Recombination-deficient mutant of Streptococcus faecalis.J. Bacteriol.1431980966970
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Identification and Characterization ofgsp65, an Organic Hydroperoxide Resistance (ohr) Gene Encoding a General Stress Protein in Enterococcus faecalis
Alain Rincé, Jean-Christophe Giard, Vianney Pichereau, Sigrid Flahaut, Yanick Auffray
Journal of Bacteriology Feb 2001, 183 (4) 1482-1488; DOI: 10.1128/JB.183.4.1482-1488.2001

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Bacteriology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Identification and Characterization ofgsp65, an Organic Hydroperoxide Resistance (ohr) Gene Encoding a General Stress Protein in Enterococcus faecalis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Bacteriology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Bacteriology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Identification and Characterization ofgsp65, an Organic Hydroperoxide Resistance (ohr) Gene Encoding a General Stress Protein in Enterococcus faecalis
Alain Rincé, Jean-Christophe Giard, Vianney Pichereau, Sigrid Flahaut, Yanick Auffray
Journal of Bacteriology Feb 2001, 183 (4) 1482-1488; DOI: 10.1128/JB.183.4.1482-1488.2001
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Enterococcus faecalis
Heat-Shock Proteins
Peroxides

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JB
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #Jbacteriology

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0021-9193; Online ISSN: 1098-5530