Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Bacteriology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
POPULATION GENETICS AND EVOLUTION

Degenerative Minimalism in the Genome of a Psyllid Endosymbiont

Marta A. Clark, Linda Baumann, MyLo Ly Thao, Nancy A. Moran, Paul Baumann
Marta A. Clark
Microbiology Section, University of California, Davis, California 95616-8665, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Linda Baumann
Microbiology Section, University of California, Davis, California 95616-8665, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MyLo Ly Thao
Microbiology Section, University of California, Davis, California 95616-8665, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nancy A. Moran
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul Baumann
Microbiology Section, University of California, Davis, California 95616-8665, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JB.183.6.1853-1861.2001
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Psyllids, like aphids, feed on plant phloem sap and are obligately associated with prokaryotic endosymbionts acquired through vertical transmission from an ancestral infection. We have sequenced 37 kb of DNA of the genome of Carsonella ruddii, the endosymbiont of psyllids, and found that it has a number of unusual properties revealing a more extreme case of degeneration than was previously reported from studies of eubacterial genomes, including that of the aphid endosymbiont Buchnera aphidicola. Among the unusual properties are an exceptionally low guanine-plus-cytosine content (19.9%), almost complete absence of intergenic spaces, operon fusion, and lack of the usual promoter sequences upstream of 16S rDNA. These features suggest the synthesis of long mRNAs and translational coupling. The most extreme instances of base compositional bias occur in the genes encoding proteins that have less highly conserved amino acid sequences; the guanine-plus-cytosine content of some protein-coding sequences is as low as 10%. The shift in base composition has a large effect on proteins: in polypeptides of C. ruddii, half of the residues consist of five amino acids with codons low in guanine plus cytosine. Furthermore, the proteins ofC. ruddii are reduced in size, with an average of about 9% fewer amino acids than in homologous proteins of related bacteria. These observations suggest that the C. ruddii genome is not subject to constraints that limit the evolution of other known eubacteria.

The insect suborder Sternorrhyncha (Hemiptera), which includes psyllids, also contains aphids, mealybugs, and whiteflies, all of which feed primarily or exclusively on plant phloem sap (5). All of these insects contain primary endosymbionts corresponding to different bacterial clades (11, 12, 18; P. Baumann, N. A. Moran, and L. Baumann,http://link.springer.de/link /service/books/10125/ ). The most extensively studied endosymbionts are those from aphids (3, 10; Baumann et al., website). The clade constituting these endosymbionts has been given the designation Buchnera aphidicola, and phylogenies based on several molecules indicate that the closest free-living relatives are members of theEnterobacteriaceae. Previously we have sequenced about 130 kb of DNA from B. aphidicola of the aphid Schizaphis graminum (Baumann et al., website), and recently the complete sequence of the 640-kb genome of the endosymbiont of the aphidAcyrthosiphon pisum has been determined (24). These genetic studies indicate that in B. aphidicola there has been a major reduction in the gene content with a retention of the genes necessary for a variety of housekeeping functions as well as the synthesis of essential amino acids and riboflavin (3, 24; Baumann et al., website). The biosynthetic functions of B. aphidicola are also supported by numerous nutritional studies (10; Baumann et al., website).

Psyllids, or “jumping plant lice” (Hemiptera: Psyllidae), differ from aphids in many aspects of life history and biogeography but are similar in that they feed on phloem sap (5, 14) and possess maternally transmitted endosymbionts (6, 11, 26; Baumann et al., website). Phloem sap of most plants is deficient in essential amino acids (23), suggesting that B. aphidicola and the endosymbionts of psyllids have the same functions related to host nutrition. The primary endosymbionts of psyllids, designated Carsonella ruddii, constitute a unique lineage within the γ3 subdivision of theProteobacteria (11, 26, 28). They are located within host cells called bacteriocytes, where they are enclosed by host-derived membrane vesicles; the multicellular structure containing the bacteriocytes is called a bacteriome (6, 7, 11, 31). In a recent study of 32 psyllid species, the phylogenetic tree derived from the 16S-23S rDNA of C. ruddii agreed with the tree derived from a host gene, a result consistent with a single infection of a psyllid ancestor and subsequent vertical transmission (cospeciation) of endosymbionts and hosts (28). Some psyllid species also contain morphologically diverse secondary (S) endosymbionts (6, 11, 26); molecular phylogenetic analyses indicate that S-endosymbionts result from multiple infections of hosts and possible horizontal transmission among them (29). Since C. ruddii appears to be present in all psyllids and the S-endosymbionts are absent in about one-third of the species (28), C. ruddii alone must be able to fulfill all of the necessary functions of the endosymbiotic association.

The 16S and 23S rDNAs of C. ruddii have G+C contents lower than those of any other known bacteria (11, 26, 28). In addition, the 3′ end of C. ruddii 16S rDNA lacks a sequence complementary to the ribosomal binding site (RBS) of mRNA (Shine-Dalgarno sequence) (28). These observations suggested that the genome of C. ruddii may also have unusual properties and led to the present study, in which we describe the results of a sequence analysis of 37 kb of C. ruddii DNA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

General methods.Standard molecular biology methods were used in this study (2, 22). Additional methods have been described in our past publications and include the isolation of total psyllid DNA, restriction enzyme and Southern blot analyses, and cloning into λZAP (Strategene, La Jolla, Calif.) (28; Baumann et al., website). The nucleotide sequence of C. ruddii DNA was determined at the University of Arizona (Tucson) LMSE sequencing facility. Besides T3 and T7 primers, custom-made oligonucleotide primers were designed for sequencing. For sequence determination of some DNA fragments, a double-stranded DNA nested deletion kit (Pharmacia, Picataway, N.J.) was used.

Most of the sequence data involved the psyllids Pachypsylla venusta and P. celtidis; additional psyllids used wereAcizzia uncatoides, Bactericera cockerelli,Ctenarytaina eucalypti, C. longicauda, C. spatulata, Calophya schini, Heteropsylla cubana, and Trioza eugenia. P. venusta and P. celtidiscontained only C. ruddii and lacked the S-endosymbiont (28).

General approach.In our previous studies on Buchnera aphidicola (endosymbiont of aphids), we developed oligonucleotide primers based on conserved protein sequences, amplified the DNAs by PCR, cloned the fragments into pBluescript (Stratagene), and subsequently determined their nucleotide sequence. These DNA fragments were used as probes for restriction enzyme and Southern blot analyses of endosymbiont DNA. Based on these results, appropriate restriction enzyme-digested DNA fragments were cloned into λZAP (Stratagene) and sequenced (3). Initially this approach was suitable for the cloning of a 4.9-kb DNA fragment from C. ruddii-P. venusta which contained atp genes (Fig.1B). Subsequent attempts to clone a portion of the 16S rDNA and the region upstream, as well as a portion of the 23S rDNA and the region downstream (Fig. 1C), using these methods failed due to instability of the recombinants or insertion ofEscherichia coli sequences. Consequently, we used two approaches to generate sets of overlapping 1.5- to 3.8-kb fragments. In the first approach, we selected proteins that are highly conserved and tend to be clustered in single regulatory units (Fig. 1) (21). Synthetic oligonucleotide primers were designed based on conserved amino acid sequences of homologous proteins. These primers also contained, at the 5′ ends, sequences for restriction enzymes. Following amplification by PCR, the DNA was digested with the appropriate restriction enzymes and cloned into pBluescript (Stratagene) or pWSK130 (a low-copy vector) (33), and the nucleotide sequence was determined. The sequences of the oligonucleotide primers and their positions on the sequenced DNA fragments will be made available on request. In some cases we were not able to extend the sequence using this approach and recourse was made to unidirectional PCR.

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Genetic maps of DNA fragments from C. ruddii.(A) The 19.2-kb DNA fragment of C. ruddii-P. venusta; (B) the 10.0-kb DNA fragment of C. ruddii-P. venusta; (C) the 7.8-kb DNA fragment of C. ruddii-P. celtidis. Thick lines, structural genes; thick striped lines, positions of probes used for restriction enzyme and Southern blot analyses to obtain fragments for Vectorette II unidirectional PCR; single-headed arrows, direction of transcription; double-headed arrows with V on top, fragments obtained with Vectorette II unidirectional PCR; double-headed arrows, overlapping DNA fragments obtained by PCR; double-headed dashed arrows, DNA fragments also obtained from endosymbionts of other psyllid species.

Unidirectional PCR.We used the Vectorette II system (Sigma-Genosys, St. Louis, Mo.) and the instructions provided by the manufacturer. From the nucleotide sequence of endosymbiont DNA fragments, we obtained a useable restriction enzyme site (close to the end which was to be extended) and the sequence for two oligonucleotide primers from which a probe was amplified by PCR. Restriction enzyme and Southern blot analyses were performed using this probe, the restriction enzyme that digests the site in the known sequence, and additional restriction enzymes. In most cases 1.6- to 3.5-kb DNA fragments were selected. The endosymbiont-psyllid DNA was digested with a combination of two restriction enzymes, and the appropriate-sized fragment was eluted from agarose gels. The ends were filled in with the Klenow fragment (2), and the DNA fragments were blunt-end ligated to phosphorylated BamHI linkers (New England Biolabs, Beverly, Mass.) and subsequently digested with BamHI. Following removal of the linkers, the fragments were ligated toBamHI-compatible Vectorette II DNA. Using an oligonucleotide primer derived from the known sequence, which also contained a restriction enzyme site(s), and a Vectorette II primer, the DNA was amplified by PCR, digested with the appropriate restriction enzymes, and cloned into either pBluescript or pWSK130. The primers used for unidirectional PCR are available upon request.

PCR conditions.PCR amplification was performed in a 50-μl volume containing 50 ng of total psyllid DNA, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM deoxynucleoside triphosphate mix, 1 μM primers, and 2 U of Bio-X-ACT DNA polymerase in Optibuffer (Bioline, London, United Kingdom). PCR products larger than 1 kb were amplified by 30 cycles consisting of a 30-s denaturation at 94°C, a 2-min annealing at 48 to 50°C, and a 5-min elongation at 70°C. For PCR products smaller than 1 kb, the annealing and elongation times were reduced to 30 s and 1 min, respectively.

Analysis of the DNA.We used GeneJockey II (Biosoft, Ferguson, Mo.) to identify open reading frames (ORFs) and Blast searches (National Center for Biotechnology Information, Bethesda, Md.) for proteins with amino acid sequence similarity. Alignment of amino acids was performed using Gap (Genetics Computer Group, Madison, Wis.). In comparative studies, sequences of B. aphidicola, Richettsia prowazekii, and Escherichia coli were also included (accession numbers AF000398 ,AJ235269 , and U00096 , respectively).

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.The following are the GenBank accession numbers (in parentheses) for the sequences of the fragments obtained in this study: C. ruddii-P. venusta 19.2 kb (Fig. 1A), AF274444 ; C. ruddii-C. eucalypti3.8 kb (Fig. 1A), AF250389 ; C. ruddii-P. celtidis 3.8 kb (Fig. 1A), AF250390 ; C. ruddii-P. venusta 10.0 kb (Fig. 1B), AF291051 ; and C. ruddii-P. celtidis 7.8 kb (Fig. 1C), AF211141 . In addition, sequences of rRNA operons (complete or partial) for the following endosymbionts were deposited: C. ruddii-P. venusta, AF211143 ; C. ruddii-C. eucalypti, AF211133 ; C. ruddii-A. uncatoides,AF211124 ; C. ruddii-C. longicauda, AF211134 ; C. ruddii-C. spatulata, AF211135 ; C. ruddii-B. cockerelli, AF211126 ; C. ruddii-C. schini, AF211132 ;C. ruddii-H. cubana, AF211138 ; and C. ruddii-T. eugenia, AF211151 .

RESULTS

General properties of the C. ruddii DNA.The three DNA fragments of C. ruddii DNA were 19,209, 10,049, and 7,806 bp in length (total, 37,057 bp) (Fig. 1A, B, and C, respectively). Searches in databases (September 2000) identified 38 ORFs as corresponding to known genes; 37 were represented in theE. coli genome, and 1 (aroQ) was found inHaemophilus influenzae. The total G+C content of the DNA fragments was 19.9 mol%. When the genes coding for rRNA (which have a higher G+C content) were excluded, the G+C content was 18.0 mol%. All genes on the longest fragment (Fig. 1A) are transcribed in one direction. The genes on the other fragments (Fig. 1B and C) are transcribed in both directions.

General properties of the ORFs.A list of the C. ruddii genes together with the product designations, G+C contents, and percent amino acid identities to E. coli homologs is presented in Table 1. The highest G+C contents are in the 16S and 23S rDNA (35.6 and 33.1%, respectively). The range of G+C contents of protein-coding genes is 9.9 (atpF) to 28.3 (tuf) mol%. A plot of the percent amino acid identity between the C. ruddii andE. coli proteins against the mol% G+C content of theC. ruddii genes (Fig.2) indicates a correlation between the conservation of the amino acid sequence of a protein and the G+C content of the C. ruddii gene encoding the protein. Less highly conserved protein sequences are encoded by genes with lower G+C contents.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Genes found C. ruddiia

Fig. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Comparisons of the percent amino acid (AA) sequence identity (ID) of homologous proteins of C. ruddii andE. coli with the percent G+C content of the C. ruddii genes.

Amino acid composition and codon usage.In C. ruddii, the reduction in G+C content has had a major effect on polypeptide sequences, causing an increased frequency of amino acids that utilize high-A+T-containing codons. Although such a shift occurs in the endosymbiont B. aphidicola and the intracellular pathogen R. prowazekii, it is most drastic in C. ruddii, in which biased base composition shows a more extreme effect on polypeptide sequences than in any previously studied bacterium (Fig. 3). Within the 32 polypeptide sequences inferred for C. ruddii that have homologs in B. aphidicola, R. prowazekii, and E. coli, 50% of the residues consist of five amino acids for which the corresponding codons have maximum A and T content (phenylalanine, lysine, isoleucine, asparagine, and tyrosine). In comparison, these amino acids comprise only 29.3% of the amino acids of B. aphidicola, 29.4% of the amino acids of R. prowazekii, and 22.3% of the amino acids of E. coli, for the same genes. This shift also affects the charge of the proteins. The calculated isoelectric points of the combined proteins of C. ruddii, B. aphidicola, R. prowazekii, and E. coli were 10.1, 9.9, 9.6, and 9.2, respectively.

Fig. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Amino acid compositions and the A+T and G+C content of codons of homologous proteins of C. ruddii (Cru),B. aphidicola (Bap), R. prowazekii (Rpr), andE. coli (Eco). The G+C contents are for the total coding regions compared. The genes compared are listed in Fig. 1A and includegidA, atpB, atpE, atpF, atpA, atpG, and atpD(Fig. 1B) and trpS (Fig. 1C).

Intergenic spaces.An inspection of the putative coding regions of C. ruddii DNA indicates a major reduction or elimination of intergenic spaces. A summary of the nucleotide sequences found between 34 adjacent genes, which are transcribed in the same direction, is presented in Table 2. In 85% of the adjacent genes there are overlapping regions between the stop codons for the upstream genes and the initiating codons for the downstream genes. The most frequent overlap arrangement (44%) is ATGA, in which the last 3 nucleotides (nt) are used as a stop codon for the upstream protein and the first 3 nt are used as the initiating methionine for the downstream protein. In 35% of the cases, the overlapping regions are longer. Even in the 15% of the adjacent gene pairs that contain an intergenic space, it is short (7 nt or less). The elimination of intergenic spaces also results in operon fusion. InE. coli and many other organisms, the genes in Fig. 1A are part of five different transcription units (L11 operon, β operon, Str operon, S10 operon, and spc operon) (13, 16). In C. ruddii, these operons appear to be part of a single transcription unit.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Nucleotide sequences between adjacent genesa

The 3.8-kb tuf-rpS3 DNA fragment designated by dashed double-headed arrows in Fig. 1A was also sequenced fromC. ruddii of two additional psyllid species. Comparisons indicate that there is both conservation and variation in some of the protein initiation and termination arrangements. InC. ruddii-P. venusta, C. ruddii-P. celtidis, and C. ruddii-C. eucalypti, the junctions betweenrpS10-rpL3, rpL3-rpL4, and rpL4-rpL2were the same (ATG̲¯A̲; the initiating codon is overlined, and the stop codon is underlined). There were differences in the remaining junctions. Between tuf-rpS10 of C. ruddii-P. venusta and C. ruddii-P. celtidisthere was A̅T̅G̅ATTAA, while inC. ruddii-C. eucalypti the sequence wasATG̲¯A̲. Between rpL2-rpS19 ofC. ruddii-P. venusta and C. ruddii-P. celtidisthe sequence was ATG̲¯A̲, while in C. ruddii-C. eucalypti the sequence wasA̅T̅G̅TCTAG. BetweenrpS19-rpL22 of C. ruddii-P. venusta andC. ruddii-P. celtidis the sequence wasATG̲¯A̲, while in C. ruddii-C. eucalypti the sequence wasA̅T̅G̅TTA6TAA. BetweenrpL22-rpS3 of C. ruddii-P. venusta and C. ruddii-C. eucalypti the sequence wasA̅T̅G̅GGA8TTAA, while inC. ruddii-P. celtidis the sequence wasA̅T̅G̅GGTAA. Similarly, the sequence of a 2.8-kb 23S-valS C. ruddii DNA fragment (Fig. 1C) was determined for C. ruddii of three additional psyllid species. In C. ruddii-P. celtidis, C. ruddii-C. eucalypti, C. ruddii-A. uncatoides, and C. ruddii-C. longicauda there was an overlapping region between the initiating ATG of aphC and the stop codon of valS, consisting of 23, 14, 8, and 14 nt, respectively. Previously it was found that the rpoB-rpoCjunction (Fig. 1A, 2.7-kb fragment) of 13 strains of C. ruddii involved the sequence ATG̲¯A̲while in the related species C. ruddii-H. cubana and C. ruddii-H. texana, the sequence in the junctions was TAAAAAA̅T̅G̅(30). Similarly, in a previous study of theatpAGD region (Fig. 1B, 1.8-kb fragment) from 31 strains ofC. ruddii, it was found that in all cases the junction region was ATG̲¯A̲ (30).

For 22 pairs of genes transcribed in the same direction, the flanking genes are the same in C. ruddii as inB. aphidicola, R. prowazekii, andE. coli, allowing direct comparison of the homologous intergenic space. For every one of these 22 cases, the space between genes in C. ruddii is absent or smaller than in any of these other three organisms (Fig. 4). This indicates that C. ruddii differs from all of these organisms in the elimination or reduction of intergenic spaces throughout the genome.

Fig. 4.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Comparison of the nucleotide length of the intergenic spaces between the same adjacent gene pairs (transcribed in the same direction) of C. ruddii (Cru), B. aphidicola(Bap), R. prowazekii (Rpr), and E. coli (Eco).ORFA and ORFB of Cru are found in the positions corresponding to atpH and atpC, respectively ofB. aphidicola, R. prowazekii, and E. coli. Numbers on top of three bars indicate the lengths (in nucleotides) of the intergenic spaces.

The same tendency to minimize sequence length is evident in the two cases in which adjacent genes are transcribed in opposite directions, with end points flanking each other. In argI-ORFC (Fig. 1B) there is an overlap of 26 nt involving the sequence TCAN18TAG, in which the last triplet is the stop codon for argI and the complement of the first triplet is the stop codon of the putative ORFC. In the ahpC-tal region (Fig.1C) of C. ruddii-P. celtidis, C. ruddii-P. venusta, C. ruddii-C. eucalypti, C. ruddii-C. longicauda, and C. ruddii-C. spatulata, translation termination involves the sequence TTATAA, in which the last triplet is the stop codon for tal while the complement of the first triplet is the stop codon of ahpC. In C. ruddii-A. uncatoides, termination involves the shorter sequence TTAA, in which the last 3 nt are the stop codon for tal while the complement of the first 3 nt (two of which overlap with the stop codon for tal) are the stop codon for ahpC.

Protein size.In Fig. 5 the sizes of 32 C. ruddii proteins are compared with those of homologous proteins of B. aphidicola, R. prowazekii, andE. coli. In 29 of the 32 cases, the C. ruddiiproteins were shorter than any of the homologs. The numbers of amino acids in proteins of B. aphidicola, R. prowazekii, andE. coli averaged 9.2, 9.1, and 9.5%, respectively, greater than those in the C. ruddii proteins. The major size difference appears in ribosomal protein L3, which has a substantial deletion at the N terminus. We have also cloned and sequenced the 3.8 kb tuf-rpS3 fragment from C. ruddii-P. celtidisand C. ruddii- C. eucalypti (Fig. 1A). A comparison of the lengths of the proteins in C. ruddii from these three psyllid species indicated that they are identical or nearly identical in size. The number of amino acids is listed in parentheses following the protein designation in the order C. ruddii-P. venusta, C. ruddii-P. celtidis, and C. ruddii-C. eucalypti(where the size is constant only one value is given): Tuf, partial 312, 312, 310; RpS10, 98; RpL3, 136; RpL4, 172; RpL2, 235, 235, 234; RpS19, 88; RpL22, 104, 101, 105; RpS3, partial 148, 148, 150.

Fig. 5.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

Comparison of the percent increase in the amino acid content of homologous proteins that are present in B. aphidicola (Bap), R. prowazekii (Rpr), andE. coli (Eco) over that in C. ruddii (Cru).

rRNA operon.Sequence comparison of the DNA region upstream of rRNA operons of B. aphidicola indicated that a sequence resembling the −35, −10 promoter region is conserved and is followed by downstream conserved sequences resembling boxA andboxC (3; Baumann et al., website). In addition, inverted repeats resembling rho-independent terminators following the rRNA operons were found. We have used a similar comparative approach to look for sequences conserved upstream of 16S rDNA which might correspond to putative promoter regions. The results are presented in Fig. 6A and indicate conservation of a sequence resembling boxA; no sequences resembling the −35, −10 promoter region were found upstream of the putativeboxA, in the last 200 nt of trpS. Similarly, there is no sequence conservation following 5S rDNA (Fig. 6B) and no significant inverted repeats resembling rho-independent terminators (25). These results suggest that the 16S-23S-5S rRNA genes are part of a larger transcription unit that includes upstream and downstream genes (Fig. 1C).

Fig. 6.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 6.

Comparisons of the intergenic sequence upstream of 16S (A) and downstream of 5S (B) in C. ruddii from different psyllids. Ba, B. aphidicola; Ec, E. coli. Nucleotides in bold letters indicate conserved sequences that are putative ends or beginnings of genes.

DISCUSSION

General properties. C. ruddii has a unique combination of properties distinguishing it from other known bacteria. These properties consist of (i) extremely low G+C content (18% for the protein-coding regions); (ii) elimination or reduction of intergenic spaces, sometimes resulting in fusion of operons; (iii) absence of the complement of an RBS at the 3′ end of 16S rDNA (28) and an RBS preceding any structural genes; (iv) a reduction in protein size; (v) absence of conserved sequences corresponding to the −35, −10 promoter region preceding 16S rDNA; and (vi) absence of inverted repeats characteristic of rho-independent terminators following 5S rDNA. The absence of intergenic spaces and the complement of the RBS at the 3′ end of 16S rDNA suggest that long polycistronic mRNAs are made and translational coupling occurs during protein synthesis (25). The organization of the rRNA genes is highly conserved in bacteria, and they are generally arranged as a single transcription unit with recognizable, conserved −35, −10 promoter regions and a rho-independent terminator(s) (19). The absence of these sequences in C. ruddii suggests that these genes are part of a larger transcription unit. Outside of the rRNA genes, the only conserved sequence that was found preceded 16S rDNA (Fig. 6A) and had some resemblance to boxA, which is involved in antitermination (4, 27). The absence of a sequence complementary to the RBS at the 3′ end of 16S-like rRNA has also been noted in animal mitochondria (35).

The elimination or reduction of intergenic spaces and the reduction in the protein sizes indicate a history of mutational pressure and/or selection favoring reduced sequence length. One interpretation of the tendency toward elimination of intergenic spacers and reduction in gene length in C. ruddii is that mutations are biased in favor of deletions relative to insertions and that selection to oppose these deletions is often weak or ineffective (due to genetic drift). An analysis of mutational patterns in pseudogenes of Rickettsiaspecies indicated a mutational bias favoring deletions (1). It is possible that C. ruddii experiences similar mutational bias but relaxed selection for conservation of function (or less efficient selection due to increased genetic drift) results in even greater shrinkage. Alternatively, selection might have favored the reduction of sequence length for some unknown reason. However, the length reduction occurs both in spacers (Fig. 4) and in protein-coding sequences (Fig. 5), which are generally subject to different kinds of selection. The bias toward A+T in DNA sequences is most readily explained as the result of mutational pressure. The pattern in Fig. 2 suggests that this mutational pressure is opposed by selection for conservation of function, with the result that genes encoding proteins which are poorly conserved have a higher A+T content. Conservative selection opposing the mutational bias appears to be weaker or less efficient than in other bacteria, with the result thatC. ruddii has the most extreme bias toward A+T known for bacteria (15). A similarly low G+C content has been found in the genome of the eukaryote Plasmodium (20).

The unique combination of properties found in C. ruddii is also illustrated by a comparison of the G+C contents of homologous rRNA subunits of bacteria, plastids, and mitochondria with the G+C contents of their genomes (or representative C. ruddii genomic fragments). Since the results for small (16S and 16S-like) and large (23S and 23S-like) subunits of rDNA are very similar, only the data for 23S rDNA are presented (Fig. 7). Two different patterns are discerned, one for bacteria and plastids and one for and mitochondria. The distinctness of the two patterns suggests the existence of different sets of constraints on allowable evolutionary change, although the reasons for these constraints are not understood. In Fig. 7, arrow (a) designates B. aphidicola, which is at the low end of the bacterial G+C content (the range for bacteria is 27 to 73 mol%). The remaining arrows designate entities which do not fit within the bacterial or mitochondrial pattern. Arrow b corresponds to the mitochondrion of the protozoan Reclinomonas americana, which is unique in that it retains many bacterial attributes such as the presence of −35, −10 promoter sequences and a mitochondrion-encoded α2ββ′ς RNA polymerase (17). Arrow c designates C. ruddii, which is distinct from the bacterial pattern and tends toward mitochondria. Arrows d and e designate highly unusual, extrachromosomal DNA molecules which are found within membrane-bounded structures in cells of the Apicomplexa (genera Plasmodium and Toxoplasma) (34). These structures appear to be remnants of plastids which have lost their photosynthetic function and are involved in fatty acid biosynthesis (32). Their position is distinct from plastids and tends toward mitochondria.

Fig. 7.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 7.

Comparison of the G+C content of 23S and 23S-like rDNA with the G+C content of the genome. ●, bacteria; ○, mitochondria; +, plastids; arrow a, B. aphidicola; arrow b,Reclinomonas americana; arrow c, Cr-Pve; arrow d,Toxoplasma gondii; arrow e, Plasmodium falciparum. Data compiled in January 2000 from GenBank and data in reference 15.

Gene content, gene order, and physiology.The list of detected genes presented in Table 1 indicates that C. ruddii encodes proteins and RNAs which have housekeeping functions. This includes rRNAs, ribosomal proteins, two subunits of RNA polymerase, elongation factors, and tRNA synthases. In addition, we detected many of the components of the ATP synthase. In E. coli and other organisms, the genes presented in Fig. 1A are part of five different operons (13, 16). In C. ruddii, these operons appear to be fused. The order of the genes is identical to that inE. coli (16), and the sole difference is the absence of three genes. C. ruddii lacks rpL23, rpL29, and rpL24, which in E. coli and many other organisms are found following rpL4, rpL16, andrpL14, respectively (Fig. 1A) (13, 16). InB. aphidicola and many other organisms, the gene order of the ATP synthase is atpBEFHAGDC (9). In C. ruddii, part of this order is maintained (Fig. 1B). However, we have not been able to detect atpH oratpC. ORFA and ORFB are found in the locations where these genes are expected, but they show no significant similarity toatpH or atpC. The presence of genes encoding ATP synthase suggests that C. ruddii may be able to generate ATP from the proton motive force. Genes for transaldolase (Fig. 1B) and transketolase (Fig. 1C) were detected, suggesting a functional nonoxidative pentose phosphate cycle. In addition, genes encoding proteins involved in the synthesis of amino acids of the glutamate and aspartate family were found. These results suggest that C. ruddii may be able to synthesize essential amino acids for the psyllid host as in the case of B. aphidicola, the endosymbiont of aphids (10, 24; Baumann et al., website).

Comparison with B. aphidicola.Both C. ruddii and B. aphidicola are associated with insect hosts that feed on plant phloem sap and thus have similar nutritional needs. These endosymbiotic associations result from infections by two different bacterial ancestors, both from the γ division of the proteobacteria (11, 18, 28; Baumann et al., website). It is likely that C. ruddii retains genes for essential amino acid pathways, as in B. aphidicola. Some of the same genomewide features appear in both species and can be interpreted as convergences; these include increased A+T content (18), accelerated sequence evolution (18, 26, 28), and shortened proteins (8). Although a slight reduction in protein length has been noted previously for B. aphidicola relative to E. coli (8), the reduction is much more severe in C. ruddii, as is evident in Fig. 5. B. aphidicola has intergenic spaces similar to those found in other bacteria (Fig. 4), and the 3′-end of its 16S rDNA has the complement of the RBS (3, 24; Baumann et al., website). The G+C contents of both the B. aphidicola genome and the B. aphidicola rRNA are comparable to those of other bacteria at the lower end of the known scale (Fig. 7). In C. ruddii, the modifications are considerably more drastic, resulting in an even lower G+C content of the DNA and almost complete elimination of intergenic spaces. B. aphidicola and some other bacteria with low G+C contents have very small genomes, having lost most of the genes found in ancestors (1, 24); future studies determining theC. ruddii genome size will be of interest.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This material is based on work supported by National Science Foundation awards MCB-9807145 (to P.B.) and DEB-9978518 (to N.A.M. and P.B.) and the University of California Experiment Station (to P.B.).

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 25 September 2000.
    • Accepted 14 December 2000.
  • Copyright © 2001 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Andersson J. O.,
    2. Andersson S. G.
    Genome degradation is an ongoing process in Rickettsia.Mol. Biol. Evol.16199911781191
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Ausubel F. M.,
    2. Brent R.,
    3. Kingston R. E.,
    4. Moore D. D.,
    5. Seidman J. G.,
    6. Smith J. A.,
    7. Struhl K.
    Current protocols in molecular biology. 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, N.Y
  3. 3.↵
    1. Baumann P.,
    2. Baumann L.,
    3. Lai C. Y.,
    4. Rouhbakhsh D.,
    5. Moran N. A.,
    6. Clark M. A.
    Genetics, physiology, and evolutionary relationships of the genus Buchnera: intracellular symbionts of aphids.Annu. Rev. Microbiol.4919955594
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    1. Berg K. L.,
    2. Squires C.,
    3. Squires C. L.
    Ribosomal RNA operon anti-termination. Function of leader and spacer region boxB-boxA sequences and their conservation in diverse micro-organisms.J. Mol. Biol.2091989345358
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. Borror D. J.,
    2. Triplehorn C. A.,
    3. Johnson N. F.
    An introduction to the study of insects 1989 335 345 The W. B. Saunders Co. Fort Worth, Tex
  6. 6.↵
    1. Buchner P.
    Endosymbiosis of animals with plant microorganisms 1965 210 332 Interscience New York, N.Y
  7. 7.↵
    1. Chang K. P.,
    2. Musgrave A. J.
    Histochemistry and ultrastructure of the mycetome and its “symbiotes” in the pear psylla, Psylla pyricola Foerster (Homoptera).Tissue Cell11969597606
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Charles H.,
    2. Mouchiroud D.,
    3. Lobry J.,
    4. Goncalves I.,
    5. Rahbe Y.
    Gene size reduction in the bacterial aphid endosymbiont, Buchnera.Mol. Biol. Evol.16199918201822
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    1. Clark M A.,
    2. Baumann P.
    The (F1F0) ATP synthase of Buchnera aphidicola (endosymbiont of aphids): genetic analysis of the putative ATP operon.Curr. Microbiol.3519978489
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Douglas A. E.
    Nutritional interactions in insect-microbial symbioses: aphids and their symbiotic bacteria Buchnera.Annu. Rev. Entomol.4319981737
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Fukatsu T.,
    2. Nikoh N.
    Two intracellular symbiotic bacteria from the mulberry psyllid Anomoneura mori (Insecta, Homoptera).Appl. Environ. Microbiol.64199835993606
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Fukatsu T.,
    2. Nikoh N.
    Endosymbiotic microbiota of the bamboo pseudococcid Antonina crawii (Insecta, Homoptera).Appl. Environ. Microbiol.662000643650
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Hansmann S.,
    2. Martin W.
    Phylogeny of 33 ribosomal and six other proteins encoded in an ancient gene cluster that is conserved across prokaryotic genomes: influence of excluding poorly alignable sites from analysis.Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.50200016551663
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    1. Hodkinson I. D.
    The biology of the Psylloidea (Homoptera): a review.Bull. Entomol. Res.641974325339
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    1. Holt J. G.
    Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology I to IV 1984–1989 The Williams & Wilkins Co. Baltimore, Md
  16. 16.↵
    1. Keener J.,
    2. Nomura M.
    Regulation of ribosome synthesis Escherichia coli and Salmonella: cellular and molecular biology 2nd ed. Neidhardt F. C., et al. 1996 1417 1431 ASM Press Washington, D.C.
  17. 17.↵
    1. Lang B. F.,
    2. Burger G.,
    3. O'Kelly C. J.,
    4. Cedergren R.,
    5. Golding G. B.,
    6. Lemieux C.,
    7. Sankoff D.,
    8. Turmel M.,
    9. Gray M. W.
    An ancestral mitochondrial DNA resembling a eubacterial genome in miniature.Nature3871997493497
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    1. Moran N. A.,
    2. Telang A.
    Bacteriocyte-associated symbionts of insects: a variety of insect groups harbor ancient prokaryotic endosymbionts.Bioscience481998295304
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    1. Munson M. A.,
    2. Baumann L.,
    3. Baumann P.
    Buchnera aphidicola (a prokaryotic endosymbiont of aphids) contains a putative 16S rRNA operon unlinked to the 23S rRNA-encoding gene: sequence determination, and promoter and terminator analysis.Gene1371993171178
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    1. Musto H.,
    2. Romero H.,
    3. Zavala A.,
    4. Jabbari K.,
    5. Bernardi G.
    Synonymous codon choices in the extremely GC-poor genome of Plasmodium falciparum: compositional constraints and translational selection.J. Mol. Evol.4919992735
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    1. Neidhardt F. C.,
    2. et al.
    Escherichia coli and Salmonella: cellular and molecular biology 2nd ed. 1996 ASM Press Washington, D.C.
  22. 22.↵
    1. Sambrook J.,
    2. Fritsch E. F.,
    3. Maniatis T.
    Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual 2nd ed. 1989 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y
  23. 23.↵
    1. Sandström J.,
    2. Moran N.
    How nutritionally imbalanced is phloem sap for aphids? Entomol. Exp. Appl. 91 1999 203 210
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. 24.↵
    1. Shigenobu S.,
    2. Watanabe H.,
    3. Hattori M.,
    4. Sakaki Y.,
    5. Ishikawa H.
    Mutualism as revealed at the genomic level: the whole genome sequence of Buchnera sp. APS, an endocellula bacterial symbiont of aphids.Nature40720008186
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. 25.↵
    1. Snyder L.,
    2. Champness W.
    Molecular genetics of bacteria. 1997 ASM Press Washington, D.C.
  26. 26.↵
    1. Spaulding A. W.,
    2. von Dohlen C. D.
    Phylogenetic characterization and molecular evolution of bacterial endosymbionts in psyllids (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha).Mol. Biol. Evol.15199815061513
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    1. Squires C. L.,
    2. Greenblatt J.,
    3. Li J.,
    4. Condon C.,
    5. Squires C. L.
    Ribosomal RNA antitermination in vitro: requirement for Nus factors and one or more unidentified cellular components.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA901993970974
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Thao M. L.,
    2. Moran N. A.,
    3. Abbot P.,
    4. Brennan E. B.,
    5. Burckhardt D. H.,
    6. Baumann P.
    Cospeciation of psyllids and their prokaryotic endosymbionts.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.66200028982905
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Thao M. L.,
    2. Clark M. A.,
    3. Baumann L.,
    4. Brennan E. B.,
    5. Moran N. A.,
    6. Baumann P.
    Secondary endosymbionts of psyllids have been acquired multiple times.Curr. Microbiol.412000300304
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. 30.↵
    Thao, M. L., M. A. Clark, D. H. Burckhardt, N. A. Moran, and P. Baumann. Phylogenetic analysis of vertically transmitted psyllid endosymbionts (Carsonella ruddii) based on atpAGD andrpoBC; comparisons with 16S–23S rDNA-derived phylogeny. Curr. Microbiol., in press.
  31. 31.↵
    1. Waku Y.,
    2. Endo Y.
    Ultrastructure and life cycle of the symbionts in a Homopteran insect, Anomoneura mori Schwartz (Psyllidae).Appl. Entomol. Zool.221987630637
    OpenUrl
  32. 32.↵
    1. Waller R. F.,
    2. Keeling P. K.,
    3. Donald R. G. K.,
    4. Striepen B.,
    5. Handman E.,
    6. Lang-Unnasch N.,
    7. Cowman A. F.,
    8. Besra G. S.,
    9. Roos D. S.,
    10. McFadden G. I.
    Nuclear-encoded proteins target to the plastid in Toxoplasma gondii and Plasmodium falciparum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95 1998 12352 12357
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Wang R. F.,
    2. Kushner S. R.
    Construction of versatile low-copy-number vectors for cloning, sequencing and gene expression in Escherichia coli. Gene 100 1991 195 199
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. 34.↵
    1. Wilson R. J. M.,
    2. Williamson D. H.
    Extrachromosomal DNA in the Apicomplexa.Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.611997116
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Wolstenholme D. R.
    Animal mitochondrial DNA: structure and evolution.Int. Rev. Cytol.1411992173214
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Degenerative Minimalism in the Genome of a Psyllid Endosymbiont
Marta A. Clark, Linda Baumann, MyLo Ly Thao, Nancy A. Moran, Paul Baumann
Journal of Bacteriology Mar 2001, 183 (6) 1853-1861; DOI: 10.1128/JB.183.6.1853-1861.2001

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Bacteriology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Degenerative Minimalism in the Genome of a Psyllid Endosymbiont
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Bacteriology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Bacteriology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Degenerative Minimalism in the Genome of a Psyllid Endosymbiont
Marta A. Clark, Linda Baumann, MyLo Ly Thao, Nancy A. Moran, Paul Baumann
Journal of Bacteriology Mar 2001, 183 (6) 1853-1861; DOI: 10.1128/JB.183.6.1853-1861.2001
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Gammaproteobacteria
Genome, Bacterial
Hemiptera
symbiosis

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JB
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #Jbacteriology

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0021-9193; Online ISSN: 1098-5530