Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Bacteriology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
    • JB Special Collection
    • JB Classic Spotlights
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
PHYSIOLOGY AND METABOLISM

Genes Involved in Copper Homeostasis inEscherichia coli

Gregor Grass, Christopher Rensing
Gregor Grass
Department of Soil, Water, and Environmental Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher Rensing
Department of Soil, Water, and Environmental Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JB.183.6.2145-2147.2001
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Recently, genes for two copper-responsive regulatory systems were identified in the Escherichia coli chromosome. In this report, data are presented that support a hypothesis that the putative multicopper oxidase CueO and the transenvelope transporter CusCFBA are involved in copper tolerance in E. coli.

Copper is required for aerobic life and yet, paradoxically, is highly toxic even at low concentrations. Intracellular copper concentrations therefore need to be regulated within very narrow limits (14). Previous attempts to elucidate copper homeostasis in Escherichia coli have been incomplete. Genes such as cutC, cutF, andndh have been suggested to be involved in copper homeostasis (9, 15, 17), but their exact roles have not been determined. Recently, two copper-responsive regulatory systems were identified. One is a two-component signal transduction system designated the Cu-sensing locus (cus locus). ThecusRS genes form a sensor-regulator pair that activates the adjacent but divergently transcribed genescusCFBA (10). The cusCBA genes are homologous to a family of proton-cation antiporter complexes involved in export of metal ions, xenobiotics, and drugs. CusF is a putative periplasmic copper-binding protein (5). The other system is regulated by CueR, a copper-activated homologue of MerR. CueR has been shown to regulate two genes, copA and cueO(formerly yacK) (13). CopA is a Cu(I)-translocating P-type ATPase, while CueO is a putative multicopper oxidase (6, 13, 16).

CueO is involved in copper tolerance.CueO and CopA are both regulated by CueR (13). To determine the role of CueO in copper tolerance, the cueO gene was disrupted. Chromosomal deletions were performed as described by Datsenko and Wanner (4), and the gene of interest was replaced by a chloramphenicol cassette. The ΔcueO::cm cassette was transduced into E. coli W3110 by P1 transduction. The resulting strain,E. coli GR1 (ΔcueO::cm), was slightly more copper sensitive on complex medium than wild-type strain E. coliW3110 (Table 1; Fig.1). At high copper concentrations thecueO-disrupted strain exhibited a distinctive colony morphology: the colonies were small, colorless, and often mucoid. The copper sensitivity of a cueO deletion-containing strain could be complemented by the presence of the cueO gene on plasmid pTYB2::cueO in trans (Table 1). Other metals tested did not have any effect on acueO-disrupted strain (data not shown).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

MICsa of copper for different genetic constructs of E. coli W3110

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Effect of several mutations on copper tolerance. Growth curves with different CuCl2 concentrations are shown. Overnight cultures were diluted 1:500 into fresh Luria-Bertani medium, and after 2 h of growth at 37°C, cells were diluted 1:500 into fresh Luria-Bertani medium with the indicated concentrations of CuCl2. Cell growth was monitored as the optical density at 600 nm after 15 h of incubation at 37°C with shaking. Strains tested include E. coli GR1 ΔcueO::cm (●), E. coli GR6 ΔcusCFBA::cm(▴), E. coli GR10 ΔcueOΔcusCFBA::cm; (♦), and E. coli W3110 (▪).

The cus determinant encodes a copper efflux system.There are at least two chromosomal copper-responsive determinants responsible for copper homeostasis. One is thecus determinant, regulated by a two-component signal transduction system encoded by the cusRS genes (10). However, deletion of the cus determinant failed to result in decreased copper tolerance (Table 1; Fig. 1). Disruption of both cueO andcusCFBA::cm in the mutant E. coli GR10 (ΔcueOΔcusCFBA::cm) resulted in a substantial decrease in copper tolerance. E. coli GR10 was mucoid even at very low copper concentrations, indicating a stress response, and ceased growth at 1.3 mM CuCl2, compared with 2.75 mM for GR1 (ΔcueO::cm) and 3.5 mM for the wild-type E. coli W3110, E. coliGR5(ΔcusA::cm), and E. coli GR6(ΔcusCFBA::cm) (Table 1). This effect was observed in the presence of copper but not with cadmium, zinc, or cobalt (data not shown). The structural genescusCFBA resemble genes of proton-cation antiporter complexes such as CzcCBA or SilCFBA involved in heavy metal resistance (8, 11). CusA is a member of the RND superfamily of proteins (18) and the central component of the multicomponent efflux pump. No difference was observed whethercusA or cusCFBA was deleted (Table 1), indicating that cusA is essential for function. These results strongly suggest that the cus determinant encodes a copper efflux system. The copper sensitivity conferred by a copAdisruption is not additive when transferred into a ΔcueOΔcusCFBA::cm double mutant, since the triple mutant E. coli GR16 (ΔcueOΔcusCFBA::cm copA::km) did not exhibit a further decrease in copper tolerance.

CusCFBA may not transport Cu(I) from the cytoplasm.The CzcCBA transenvelope transporter from “Ralstonia metallidurans” CH34 is thought to function as a proton-cation antiporter expelling cations from the cytoplasm across the inner and outer membranes. Two channels in CzcA are proposed to form a charge-relay system, where proton transport generates an electrical field that drives the transport of cations into the periplasm (7). However, thecus determinant probably does not transport cytoplasmic Cu(I), since E. coli GR13 (copA::kmΔcusA::cm) was no more sensitive than strain DW3110 (ΔcopA) (Table 1). If CusCFBA extrudes copper from the cytosol, deletion of the cusdeterminant would be expected to have an additive effect on the phenotype of a copA::km mutant. Other transporters of the RND superfamily, such as AcrB and MexB, can efflux substrates that do not cross the cytoplasmic membrane (12). It was therefore suggested that binding of the substrate might occur on the periplasmic side of the transporter (19). CusA contains multiple methionine residues in the second large periplasmic domain. These residues, which are not present in CzcA, could be involved in copper binding. Furthermore, CusF is a putative periplasmic protein with potential copper binding sites. Thus, it is possible that the CusCFBA transenvelope transporter binds and transports periplasmic copper. Since thecus determinant is also responsible for a small increase in Ag(I) resistance (5), it is likely that the transported copper species is Cu(I).

CopA from “R. metallidurans” can functionally substitute for CueO.CueO is homologous to the putative multicopper oxidases PcoA (E. coli), CopA (“R. metallidurans”; accession no. CAC07979) and CopA (Pseudomonas syringae), which are encoded by genes present in the plasmid-borne copper resistance operon pco inE. coli and the cop operons of “R. metallidurans” and P. syringae, respectively (3, 1). It should be pointed out that the “R. metallidurans” and P. syringae CopA proteins are not P-type ATPases, although PcoA, P. syringae CopA, and probably “R. metallidurans” CopA are essential components of their plasmid-encoded copper resistance determinants. PcoA, CopA (P. syringae), and CopA (“R. metallidurans”) are largely identical to each other and probably have similar functions. The degree of similarity between CueO and PcoA, CopA (P. syringae), and CopA (“R. metallidurans”) is much smaller, suggesting that they are distantly related. However, all four putative multicopper oxidases have leader sequences including a twin-arginine motif for export into the periplasm by the Tat pathway (13). CueO has a methionine-rich region that is also observed in PcoA and the CopA proteins from “R. metallidurans” and P. syringae. CopA (P. syringae) has been shown to be a periplasmic protein (2). CopA from R. metallidurans is functionally similar to CueO, sincecopA on plasmid pTYB2::copA can complement the single mutant E. coli GR1 (ΔcueO::cm) (Table 1) and the double mutantE. coli GR10 (ΔcueOΔcusCFBA::cm) (Table 1). Likewise, the double mutant E. coli GR10 (ΔcueOΔcusCFBA::cm) can also be complemented bycueO on a plasmid (Table 1). By analogy, we suggest that CueO and CopA (“R. metallidurans”) are periplasmic proteins. Possibly, CueO prevents uptake of Cu(I) into the cytoplasm by oxidizing it to Cu(II). Additionally, by oxidizing Cu(I) to Cu(II), CueO might confer copper tolerance by preventing oxidative damage in the periplasm. The functions of PcoA, CopA (P. syringae), and CopA (“R. metallidurans”) might be similar.

Another possibility is that the putative multicopper oxidases are secreted into the periplasm with their copper atoms already incorporated, consistent with the presence of the twin-arginine motifs. The synthesis and secretion of these proteins could result in a net efflux of copper from the cytoplasm, as was measured for thepco system (1). However, E. colistrain GR8, where both copA and cueO were disrupted, exhibited only a slight decrease in copper tolerance compared to strain DW3110, which has only copA disrupted (Table 1). One molecule of the homologous CopA protein (P. syringae) was shown to bind approximately 11 atoms of copper (2). It seems unlikely that the amounts of copper transported by CopA (P. syringae) and possibly by CueO would be sufficient to confer copper resistance.

Conclusions.In this report we show that CueO and CusCFBA are involved in copper tolerance. CueO is homologous to multicopper oxidases such as ceruloplasmin, ascorbate oxidase, PcoA, and CopA (P. syringae) and is probably a periplasmic protein. CueO might oxidize Cu(I) to Cu(II) and can be functionally replaced by CopA from “R. metallidurans”. Thecus determinant encodes a copper efflux system that might transport periplasmic Cu(I) [and Ag(I)] across the outer membrane. This suggests that the two determinants provide alternate fates for periplasmic Cu(I): either oxidation by CueO or transport into the extracellular medium by CusCFBA. These studies are a starting point to further elucidate the molecular mechanisms of copper homeostasis in prokaryotes. Further biochemical studies are necessary to understand the function of CusCFBA, CueO, and other, yet-unidentified components.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by hatch project 136713 to C.R.

We thank Barry Rosen for providing P1 lysate and for helpful suggestions and Dietrich Nies and Barry Wanner for the generous gift of strains.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 4 October 2000.
    • Accepted 19 December 2000.
  • Copyright © 2001 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Brown N. L.,
    2. Barrett S. R.,
    3. Camakaris J.,
    4. Lee B. T.,
    5. Rouch D. A.
    (1995) Molecular genetics and transport analysis of the copper-resistance determinant (pco) from Escherichia coli plasmid pRJ1004. Mol. Microbiol. 17:1153–1166.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Cha J.,
    2. Cooksey D. A.
    (1991) Copper resistance in Pseudomonas syringae mediated by periplasmic and outer membrane proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:8915–8919.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Cooksey D. A.
    (1994) Molecular mechanisms of copper resistance and accumulation in bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 14:381–386.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    1. Datsenko K. A.,
    2. Wanner B. L.
    (2000) One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K12 using PCR products. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:6640–6645.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Franke, S., G. Grass, and D. H. Nies. The product of the ybdE gene of the Escherichia colichromosome is involved in detoxification of silver ions. Microbiology, in press.
  6. ↵
    1. Gatti D.,
    2. Mitra B.,
    3. Rosen B. P.
    (2000) Escherichia coli soft metal ion-translocating ATPases. J. Biol. Chem. 275:34009–34012.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Goldberg M.,
    2. Pribyl T.,
    3. Juhnke S.,
    4. Nies D. H.
    (1999) Energetics and topology of CzcA, a cation/proton antiporter of the resistance-nodulation-cell division protein family. J. Biol. Chem. 274:26065–26070.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Gupta,
    2. Matsui A. K.,
    3. Lo J. F.,
    4. Silver S.
    (1999) Molecular basis for resistance to silver cations in Salmonella. Nat. Med. 5:183–188.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    1. Gupta S. D.,
    2. Lee B. T.,
    3. Camakaris J.,
    4. Wu H. C.
    (1995) Identification of cutC and cutF(nlpE) genes involved in copper tolerance in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 177:4207–4215.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Munson G. P.,
    2. Lam D. L.,
    3. Outten F. W.,
    4. O'Halloran T. V.
    (2000) Identification of a copper-responsive two-component system on the chromosome of Escherichia coli K-12. J. Bacteriol. 182:5864–5871.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Nies D. H.
    (1999) Microbial heavy-metal resistance. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 51:730–750.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. ↵
    1. Nikaido H.,
    2. Basina M.,
    3. Nguyen V.,
    4. Rosenberg E. Y.
    (1998) Multidrug efflux pump AcrAB of Salmonella typhimurium excretes only those β-lactam antibiotics containing lipophilic side chains. J. Bacteriol. 180:4686–4692.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Outten F. W.,
    2. Outten C. E.,
    3. Hale J.,
    4. O'Halloran T. V.
    (2000) Transcriptional activation of an E. coli copper efflux regulon by the chromosomal MerR homologue, CueR. J. Biol. Chem. 275:31024–31029.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Pena M. M. O.,
    2. Lee J.,
    3. Thiele D. J.
    (1999) A delicate balance: homeostatic control of copper uptake and distribution. J. Nutr. 129:1251–1260.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Rapisarda V. A.,
    2. Montelongo L. R.,
    3. Farias R. N.,
    4. Massa E. M.
    (1999) Characterization of an NADH-linked cupric reductase activity from the Escherichia coli respiratory chain. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 370:143–150.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    1. Rensing C.,
    2. Fan B.,
    3. Sharma R.,
    4. Mitra B.,
    5. Rosen B. P.
    (2000) CopA: an Escherichia coli Cu(I)-translocating P-type ATPase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:652–656.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Rouch D.,
    2. Camakaris J.,
    3. Lee B. T. O.
    (1989) Copper transport in E. coli, in Metal ion homeostasis: molecular biology and chemistry. eds Hamer D. H., Winge D. R. (Alan R. Liss, Inc. New York, N.Y), pp 469–477.
  18. ↵
    1. Saier M. H. Jr.,
    2. Tam R.,
    3. Reizer A.,
    4. Reizer J.
    (1994) Two novel families of bacterial membrane proteins concerned with nodulation, cell division and transport. Mol. Microbiol. 11:841–847.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. ↵
    1. Zgurskaya H. I.,
    2. Nikaido H.
    (2000) Multidrug resistance mechanisms: drug efflux across two membranes. Mol. Microbiol. 37:219–225.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Genes Involved in Copper Homeostasis inEscherichia coli
Gregor Grass, Christopher Rensing
Journal of Bacteriology Mar 2001, 183 (6) 2145-2147; DOI: 10.1128/JB.183.6.2145-2147.2001

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Bacteriology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Genes Involved in Copper Homeostasis inEscherichia coli
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Bacteriology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Bacteriology.
Share
Genes Involved in Copper Homeostasis inEscherichia coli
Gregor Grass, Christopher Rensing
Journal of Bacteriology Mar 2001, 183 (6) 2145-2147; DOI: 10.1128/JB.183.6.2145-2147.2001
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JB
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #Jbacteriology

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

Copyright © 2019 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0021-9193; Online ISSN: 1098-5530